Manlia gens

Last updated
Denarius of Lucius Manlius Torquatus, 113-112 BC. The obverse depicts the head of Roma within a torque, the emblem of the Manlii Torquati. The reverse depicts a warrior charging into battle on horseback, beneath the letter 'Q', signifying Torquatus' quaestorship. L. Manlius Torquatus, denarius, 113-112 BC, RRC 295-1.jpg
Denarius of Lucius Manlius Torquatus, 113–112 BC. The obverse depicts the head of Roma within a torque, the emblem of the Manlii Torquati. The reverse depicts a warrior charging into battle on horseback, beneath the letter 'Q', signifying Torquatus' quaestorship.

The gens Manlia was one of the oldest and noblest patrician houses at Rome, from the earliest days of the Republic until imperial times. The first of the gens to obtain the consulship was Gnaeus Manlius Cincinnatus, consul in 480 BC, and for nearly five centuries its members frequently held the most important magistracies. Many of them were distinguished statesmen and generals, and a number of prominent individuals under the Empire claimed the illustrious Manlii among their ancestors. [1]

Contents

Origin

The Manlii were said to hail from the ancient Latin city of Tusculum. The nomen Manlia may be a patronymic surname, based on the praenomen Manius , presumably the name of an ancestor of the gens. [2] The gens Manilia was derived from the same name, and its members are frequently confused with the Manlii, as are the Mallii. [1] However, Manius was not used by any of the Manlii in historical times. The Manlii were probably numbered amongst the gentes maiores, the greatest of the patrician families. As with many patrician gentes, the Manlii seem to have acquired plebeian branches as well, and one of the family was tribune of the plebs in the time of Cicero. The plebeian Manlii were probably descended from freedmen of the patricians, from members who had gone over to the plebeians, or from unrelated persons who acquired the nomen after obtaining the franchise from one of the Manlii.

Praenomina

The Manlii used the praenomina Publius, Gnaeus, Aulus, Lucius , and Marcus . The Manlii Torquati also favored the name Titus , using primarily that, Aulus, and Lucius.

A well-known story relates that after Marcus Manlius Capitolinus was condemned for treason, the Roman Senate decreed that henceforth none of the gens should bear the praenomen Marcus. However, this legend may have originated as a way to explain the scarcity of the name amongst the Manlii, as the name was rarely used in later generations.

Branches and cognomina

Denarius of Lucius Manlius Torquatus, 65 BC. The obverse depicts the head of the Sibyl, while a tripod and amphora, instruments of the quindecimviri sacris faciundis, appear within a torque on the reverse. L. Manlius Torquatus, denarius, 82 BC, RRC 411-1b.jpg
Denarius of Lucius Manlius Torquatus, 65 BC. The obverse depicts the head of the Sibyl, while a tripod and amphora, instruments of the quindecimviri sacris faciundis , appear within a torque on the reverse.

The earliest cognomen found amongst the Manlii is Cincinnatus, better known from the Quinctia gens. This name originally referred to a person with fine, curly hair. The descendants of Gnaeus Manlius Cincinnatus bore the surname Vulso, meaning "plucked", perhaps chosen for its contrast to Cincinnatus. [3] Münzer, noting that the cognomen Cincinnatus is missing from the older historians, supposed that it might be a mistake, and that Vulso was the original surname of the Manlian gens. [4] [5] The Manlii Vulsones flourished for over three hundred years. [6]

The Manlii Capitolini were descended from the Vulsones, and first appear in the second half of the fifth century BC. The surname Capitolinus probably indicates that the family lived on the Capitoline Hill, although the role of Marcus Manlius in saving the Capitol from the Gauls during the sack of Rome in 390 BC is also credited with establishing the name in his family. [7] The surname was relatively short-lived amongst the Manlii, being replaced by that of Torquatus. This surname was first acquired by Titus Manlius Imperiosus, who defeated a giant Gaul during a battle in 361 BC, and took his torque as a trophy, placing it around his own neck. [8] The descendants of Torquatus remained prominent until the final decades of the Republic, and adopted the torque as an emblem upon their coins. Imperiosus, a cognomen borne by Torquatus and his father, was bestowed on account of their imperious manner. [9] [10] The Manlii Torquati were firmly aligned with the aristocratic party toward the end of the Republic, siding first with Sulla, then with Pompeius and the Liberatores . In later times, Torquatus was borne by the Junii Silani, who were descended from the Manlii.

The Manlii Acidini rose to prominence during the Second Punic War, but achieved only one consulship, in 179, before fading into relative obscurity. They still flourished in the time of Cicero, who praises their nobility. [11] [12]

From coins of the Manlii featuring the inscriptions SER and SERGIA, Münzer concluded that one stirps of this gens bore the cognomen Sergianus, indicating descent from the Sergia gens. However, this probably referred to the tribus Sergia; a plebeian branch of the Manlii used the name of their tribe to distinguish themselves from the patrician Manlii, a practice also found among the Memmii. [13] [14] [15] [16]

Towards the end of the Republic, several early Manlii appear without cognomina, such as Quintus and Gnaeus Manlius, tribunes of the plebs in 69 and 58 BC. [1]

Members

This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation.

Manlii Cincinnati et Vulsones

Manlii Capitolini

Manlii Torquati

Aureus of Lucius Manlius Torquatus with Sulla, 82 BC. The obverse depicts a head of Roma, while on the reverse a victorious general triumphs in a quadriga, crowned by Victoria, alluding to Sulla's campaign against the younger Marius and Papirius Carbo. L. Sulla & L. Manlius Torquatus, aureus, 82 BC, RRC 367-4.jpg
Aureus of Lucius Manlius Torquatus with Sulla, 82 BC. The obverse depicts a head of Roma, while on the reverse a victorious general triumphs in a quadriga, crowned by Victoria, alluding to Sulla's campaign against the younger Marius and Papirius Carbo.

Stemma of the Manlii Torquati

Stemma taken from Münzer until "A. Manlius Torquatus, d. 208", and then Mitchell, with corrections. All dates are BC. [112] [113]

Legend
Green
Consul
T. Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus
dict. 353, 349, 320
cos. 347, 344, 340
T. Manlius Torquatus
d. 340
T. Manlius Torquatus
cos. 299
L. Manlius Torquatus
legate 295
T. Manlius Torquatus
T. Manlius TorquatusA. Manlius Torquatus
cens. 247; cos. 244, 241
T. Manlius Torquatus
cos. 235, 224
cens. 231; dict. 208
A. Manlius Torquatus
d. 208
T. Manlius Torquatus
cos. 165
A. Manlius Torquatus
cos. 164
T. Manlius Torquatus
pr. 137
D. Junius
Silanus Manlianus
pr. 142, d. 140
T. Manlius TorquatusL. Manlius Torquatus
qu. circa 113
A. Manlius Torquatus
T. Manlius Torquatus
pr. 69
P. Cornelius
Lentulus Spinther
(adopted) augur 57
Manlia L. Manlius Torquatus
cos. 65
A. Manlius Torquatus
pr. 70
L. Manlius Torquatus
pr. 49
A. Manlius Torquatus
qu. 43, pontifex
A. Manlius TorquatusT. Manlius Torquatus

Manlii Acidini

Denarius of Aulus Manlius, 118-107 BC. The obverse depicts a head of Roma, while Sol drives a quadriga on the reverse. A. Manlius Q.f. Sergianus, denarius, 118-107 BC, RRC 309-1.jpg
Denarius of Aulus Manlius, 118–107 BC. The obverse depicts a head of Roma, while Sol drives a quadriga on the reverse.

Others

Aureus of Aulus Manlius, 80 BC. Roma is portrayed on the obverse. The reverse depicts an equestrian statue of Sulla, which was placed in front of the Rostra. The head of Roma looks like the one on the denarii of his father. A. Manlius A.f., aureus, 80 BC, RRC 381-1a.jpg
Aureus of Aulus Manlius, 80 BC. Roma is portrayed on the obverse. The reverse depicts an equestrian statue of Sulla, which was placed in front of the Rostra. The head of Roma looks like the one on the denarii of his father.

See also

Footnotes

  1. Livy calls him Gaius, a name not otherwise used by the Manlii, but evidently a mistake for Gnaeus, given in the filiation of his grandson, Aulus Manlius Vulso Capitolinus, consular tribune in 405, 402, and 397. The two names were nearly always abbreviated, and frequently confounded. Diodorus calls him Marcus, and Dionysius Aulus. None of these explicitly identify the decemvir with the consul of 474, nor do Livy or Diodorus state that he had previously been consul, although Dionysius erroneously indicates that he had been consul the previous year. The chronological difficulty in identifying the decemvir with the consul of 474 arises from the decemvir's son serving as consular tribune three times from 405 to 397; unless he were the child of the decemvir's old age, he would have been rather elderly by the time he first achieved high office, if his father were consul nearly seventy years earlier.
  2. Called "Gaius" by Livy. His cognomen is uncertain; it could also be Capitolinus, or he may have borne both.
  3. Broughton and Mitchell place his quaestorship much later, circa 94 and 96, respectively. However, Crawford's dating of circa 112 fits better with the chronology, as Lucius' son also minted coins with Sulla in 82.
  4. It was forbidden to have two members of the same gens in the college of pontiffs.
  5. Broughton and Mitchell suppose that he was quaestor in 81, but Crawford attributes the coins inscribed "A. Manli A. f. Q[uaestor]" to another Manlius, who was not one of the Torquati.
  6. Mitchell guesses that his name was Aulus, because typical Roman practice was for an eldest son to be named after his father.
  7. According to Münzer, he was the son of Lucius Manlius Vulso, praetor peregrinus in 218 BC.
  8. Münzer and Brougton express doubt as to his filiation, based on the tradition respecting the intentional disuse of the praenomen Marcus following the death of Marcus Manlius Capitolinus in the fourth century BC. Münzer also doubts the existence of a collateral branch of the family, since the adoption of Fulvianus a generation earlier implies that the Acidini were on the verge of extinction.
  9. Münzer suggested that he was a Vulso, but Broughton disagrees, saying that he was succeeded as epulo by a plebeian, so he must have been a plebeian as well.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Furia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Furia, originally written Fusia, and sometimes found as Fouria on coins, was one of the most ancient and noble patrician houses at Rome. Its members held the highest offices of the state throughout the period of the Roman Republic. The first of the Furii to attain the consulship was Sextus Furius in 488 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aurelia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Aurelia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome, which flourished from the third century BC to the latest period of the Empire. The first of the Aurelian gens to obtain the consulship was Gaius Aurelius Cotta in 252 BC. From then to the end of the Republic, the Aurelii supplied many distinguished statesmen, before entering a period of relative obscurity under the early emperors. In the latter part of the first century, a family of the Aurelii rose to prominence, obtaining patrician status, and eventually the throne itself. A series of emperors belonged to this family, through birth or adoption, including Marcus Aurelius and the members of the Severan dynasty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Junia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Junia or Iunia was one of the most celebrated families of ancient Rome. The gens may originally have been patrician, and was already prominent in the last days of the Roman monarchy. Lucius Junius Brutus was the nephew of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the seventh and last king of Rome, and on the expulsion of Tarquin in 509 BC, he became one of the first consuls of the Roman Republic.

The gens Papiria was a patrician family at ancient Rome. According to tradition, the Papirii had already achieved prominence in the time of the kings, and the first Rex Sacrorum and Pontifex Maximus of the Republic were members of this gens. Lucius Papirius Mugillanus was the first of the Papirii to obtain the consulship in 444 BC. The patrician members of the family regularly occupied the highest offices of the Roman state down to the time of the Punic Wars. Their most famous member was Lucius Papirius Cursor, five times consul between 326 and 313 BC, who earned three triumphs during the Samnite Wars. Most of the Papirii who held office under the later Republic belonged to various plebeian branches of the family. Although the most illustrious Papirii flourished in the time of the Republic, a number of the family continued to hold high office during the first two centuries of the Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quinctia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Quinctia, sometimes written Quintia, was a patrician family at ancient Rome. Throughout the history of the Republic, its members often held the highest offices of the state, and it produced some men of importance even during the imperial period. For the first forty years after the expulsion of the kings the Quinctii are not mentioned, and the first of the gens who obtained the consulship was Titus Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus in 471 BC; but from that year their name constantly appears in the Fasti consulares.

Titus Manlius Torquatus was a politician of the Roman Republic. He had a long and distinguished career, being consul in 235 BC and 224 BC, censor in 231 BC, and dictator in 208 BC. He was an ally of Fabius Maximus "Cunctator".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cornelia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Cornelia was one of the greatest patrician houses at ancient Rome. For more than seven hundred years, from the early decades of the Republic to the third century AD, the Cornelii produced more eminent statesmen and generals than any other gens. At least seventy-five consuls under the Republic were members of this family, beginning with Servius Cornelius Maluginensis in 485 BC. Together with the Aemilii, Claudii, Fabii, Manlii, and Valerii, the Cornelii were almost certainly numbered among the gentes maiores, the most important and powerful families of Rome, who for centuries dominated the Republican magistracies. All of the major branches of the Cornelian gens were patrician, but there were also plebeian Cornelii, at least some of whom were descended from freedmen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus</span> 4th-century BC Roman general and statesman

Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus was a famous politician and general of the Roman Republic, of the old gens Manlia. He had an outstanding career, being consul three times, in 347, 344, and 340 BC, and dictator three times, in 353, 349, and 320 BC. He was one of the early heroes of the Republic, alongside Cincinnatus, Cornelius Cossus, Furius Camillus, and Valerius Corvus. As a young military tribune, he defeated a huge Gaul in one of the most famous duels of the Republic, which earned him the epithet Torquatus after the torc he took from the Gaul's body. He was also known for his moral virtues, and his severity became famous after he had his own son executed for disobeying orders in a battle. His life was seen as a model for his descendants, who tried to emulate his heroic deeds, even centuries after his death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sempronia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Sempronia was one of the most ancient and noble houses of ancient Rome. Although the oldest branch of this gens was patrician, with Aulus Sempronius Atratinus obtaining the consulship in 497 BC, the thirteenth year of the Republic, but from the time of the Samnite Wars onward, most if not all of the Sempronii appearing in history were plebeians. Although the Sempronii were illustrious under the Republic, few of them attained any importance or notice in imperial times.

Gnaeus Manlius Vulso was Roman consul in 474 BC with Lucius Furius Medullinus Fusus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pomponia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Pomponia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. Its members appear throughout the history of the Roman Republic, and into imperial times. The first of the gens to achieve prominence was Marcus Pomponius, tribune of the plebs in 449 BC; the first who obtained the consulship was Manius Pomponius Matho in 233 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plaetoria gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Plaetoria was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. A number of Plaetorii appear in history during the first and second centuries BC, but none of this gens ever obtained the consulship. Several Plaetorii issued denarii from the late 70s into the 40s, of which one of the best known alludes to the assassination of Caesar on the Ides of March, since one of the Plaetorii was a partisan of Pompeius during the Civil War.

Vopiscus Julius Iullus was a Roman statesman, who held the consulship in 473 BC, a year in which the authority of the Roman magistrates was threatened after the murder of a tribune of the plebs.

The gens Manilia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are frequently confused with the Manlii, Mallii, and Mamilii. Several of the Manilii were distinguished in the service of the Republic, with Manius Manilius obtaining the consulship in 149 BC; but the family itself remained small and relatively unimportant.

Aulus Manlius Vulso was a Roman politician in the 5th century BC, and was a member of the first college of the decemviri in 451 BC. In 474 BC, he may have been elected consul with Lucius Furius Medullinus. Whether or not the decemvir is the same man as the consul of 474 BC remains unknown.

Titus Manlius Torquatus was a politician of the Roman Republic, who became consul in 165 BC. Born into a prominent family, he sought to emulate the legendary severity of his ancestors, notably by forcing his son to commit suicide after he had been accused of corruption. Titus had a long career and was a respected jurist. He was also active in diplomatic affairs; he notably served as ambassador to Egypt in 162 BC in a mission to support the claims of Ptolemy VIII Physcon over Cyprus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aulus Manlius Torquatus Atticus</span> Roman politician and general

Aulus Manlius Torquatus Atticus was a politician during the Roman Republic. Born into the prominent patrician family of the Manlii Torquati, he had a distinguished career, becoming censor in 247 BC, then twice consul in 244 and 241 BC, and possibly princeps senatus in 220 BC. Despite these prestigious magistracies, little is known about his life. He was a commander who served during the First Punic War, and might have pushed for the continuation of the war even after Carthage had sued for peace following the Roman victory at the Aegate Islands in 241 BC. The same year, he suppressed the revolt of the Faliscans in central Italy, for which he was awarded a triumph. At this occasion, he may have introduced the cult of Juno Curitis at Rome.

Titus Quinctius PoenusCincinnatus was a consul of the Roman Republic in 431 and 428 BC and a consular tribune in 426 BC. He might have been consular tribune again in 420 BC.

Aulus Manlius Vulso Capitolinus was a consular tribune of the Roman Republic in 405, 402 and 397 BC.

Aulus Cornelius Cossus Arvina was a Roman statesman and general who served as both consul and Magister Equitum twice, and Dictator in 322 BC.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. II, p. 920 ("Manlia Gens").
  2. Chase, pp. 122, 123.
  3. Chase, pp. 109, 110.
  4. PW, vol. 27, p. 1157.
  5. Broughton, vol. I, p. 25 (note 1).
  6. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. III, pp. 1285, 1286 ("Vulso").
  7. Chase, pp. 113, 114.
  8. Livy, vii. 10.
  9. Chase, pp. 110, 111.
  10. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. I, pp. 604, 605 ("Manlius Capitolinus"), vol. II, p. 571 ("Imperiosus"), vol. III, pp. 1163–1165 ("Manlius Torquatus").
  11. Cicero, De Lege Agraria, ii. 24.
  12. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. I, pp. 12, 13 ("Acidinus").
  13. Eckhel, vol. v, p. 244.
  14. PW, vol. 27, p. 1159.
  15. Taylor, Voting Districts, pp. 229, 230.
  16. Mattingly, "Numismatic Evidence", pp. 12–14.
  17. Livy, ii. 43, 45, 47.
  18. Dionysius, ix. 5, 6, 11, 12.
  19. Orosius, ii. 5.
  20. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 24, 25 (note 1).
  21. Livy, ii. 54.
  22. Dionysius, ix. 36–38.
  23. Diodorus Siculus, xi. 63.
  24. Fasti Triumphales .
  25. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 28, 43–46.
  26. Livy, iii. 33.
  27. Dionysius, x. 52, 56, 57.
  28. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 43–46.
  29. Livy, iv. 44.
  30. Broughton, vol. I, p. 70.
  31. Livy, v. 12
  32. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 84, 85 (note 1).
  33. Livy, vi. 30
  34. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 208, 209, 213.
  35. Livy, xxii. 35.
  36. PW, vol. 27, pp. 1178, 1222, 1223.
  37. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 238, 240 (note 4).
  38. Livy, xxvi. 23, xxvii. 6, 7.
  39. Broughton, vol. I, p. 279.
  40. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 165.
  41. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 333, 340, 360, 366, 369.
  42. Livy, xxxii. 27, 28, xxxviii. 20, 39.
  43. Polybius, xxii, 25, 26.
  44. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 333, 364, 367.
  45. Livy, xxxiii. 42, xxxix. 51.
  46. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 340, 382.
  47. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 345, 349, 361, 395, 397 (note 1), 399.
  48. PW, vol. 27, pp. 1178, 1228.
  49. Broughton, vol. I, p. 460 (note 6).
  50. Livy, iv. 23.
  51. Broughton, vol. I, p. 61.
  52. Livy, iv. 42.
  53. Broughton, vol. I, p. 69.
  54. Livy, iv. 61, v. 8, 16.
  55. 1 2 Fasti Capitolini , AE 1927, 101; 1940, 59, 60.
  56. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 80, 83, 87.
  57. Broughton, vol. I, p. 87.
  58. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 92, 99.
  59. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 96, 97, 99, 100 (note 2), 101, 103, 110, 111 (note 1).
  60. Livy, vii. 12.
  61. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 106, 112, 113.
  62. Livy, vii. 3, 4.
  63. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 117, 118.
  64. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 121, 122, 123 (note 1), 124.
  65. Broughton, vol.I, pp. 119, 120, 125, 129, 130, 132, 135, 136, 153.
  66. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 136, 137.
  67. Broughton, vol.I, pp. 173, 174 (note 2).
  68. Livy, x. 26.
  69. Broughton, vol. I, p. 178.
  70. Broughton, vol.I, pp. 216, 217, 219.
  71. Livy, xxiii. 34.
  72. Broughton, vol.I, pp. 223, 226, 231, 256-258 (note 4), 282, 290.
  73. Broughton, vol.I, p. 292.
  74. Broughton, vol.I, pp. 420, 422, 423 (note 4), 438, 442.
  75. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 433, 439.
  76. Florus, Epitome, ii. 7 § 7.
  77. Broughton, vol. I, p. 486.
  78. Florus, Epitome, 54.
  79. Valerius Maximus, v. 8. § 3.
  80. Cicero, De Finibus, i, 24. Decius in the manuscript.
  81. Broughton, vol. I, p. 477.
  82. Morgan, "Cornelius and the Pannonians", pp. 195–198.
  83. Mitchell, "The Torquati", p. 31.
  84. Broughton, vol. II, p. 13.
  85. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 308.
  86. Cicero, Pro Plancio, 27.
  87. 1 2 Mitchell, "The Torquati", p. 25.
  88. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 61, 64, 70, 138, 146, 150 (note 11), 151 (note 16), 157, 163, 169.
  89. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 386, 387.
  90. Cicero, Brutus, 245.
  91. Homolle, BCH, 3, p. 156.
  92. Broughton, vol. II, p. 493.
  93. Cicero, Pro Sestio, 144.
  94. Cassius Dio, xxxix. 17.
  95. Broughton, vol. II, p. 207.
  96. Cicero, Pro Plancio 11.
  97. Appian, Bella Mithridatica, 95.
  98. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 77, 127, 133, 149, 237.
  99. Syme, Ronald (1989). The Augustan Aristocracy (illustrated and revised ed.). Clarendon Press. p. 158. ISBN   9780198147312.
  100. Caesar, De Bello Africo, 96.
  101. Orosius, vi. 16 § 5. Incorrectly named Titus.
  102. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 135, 256, 277, 289, 297, 298; vol. III, p. 136.
  103. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 439.
  104. Sumner, The Orators in Cicero's Brutus, pp. 139–140.
  105. Appian, Bellum Civile, iii. 69, 76.
  106. Taylor, "Augustan Editing", pp. 76, 79 (note 13).
  107. Broughton, vol. II, p. 341.
  108. Mitchell, "The Torquati", p. 27.
  109. Mitchell, "The Torquati", pp. 26, 31.
  110. Cicero, pro Rege Deiotaro, 32.
  111. Mitchell, "The Torquati", p. 26.
  112. Mitchell, "The Torquati".
  113. Münzer, PW, vol. 27, pp. 1181-1182.
  114. Livy, xxvii. 4.
  115. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 279, 300, 303, 308, 313, 317, 321, 324.
  116. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 365, 369, 371, 373, 379, 380,
  117. 1 2 Livy, xlii. 49.
  118. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 417, 419 (note 1), 428.
  119. PW, vol. 27, p. 1178; No. 26.
  120. PW, vol. 27, p. 1163.
  121. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 417, 419 (note 1).
  122. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, xii. 32
  123. Appian, Bellum Civile, i. 97.
  124. 1 2 Mattingly, "Numismatic Evidence", p. 13.
  125. Livy, ii. 19.
  126. Broughton, vol I, p. 10.
  127. Livy, xxxiii. 42, xl. 1, 16, 41, 42.
  128. Plutarch, Cato the Elder, 17 § 7. Manilius in the text.
  129. PW, vol. 27, pp. 1159-1161, 1178.
  130. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 338, 339 (note 9), 382, 383 (note 1), 385, 389.
  131. Sallust, Bellum Jugurthinum, 86, 90, 102.
  132. Broughton, vol. I, p. 552.
  133. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 318.
  134. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, pp. 312, 313.
  135. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 397.
  136. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 83, 87.
  137. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 92 (note 7), 132.
  138. Broughton, vol. II, p. 116.
  139. Broughton, vol. II, p. 160.
  140. Cassius Dio, xxxvii. 47.
  141. Asconius Pedianus, In Ciceronis Pro Milone, p. 46.
  142. Grant, From Imperium To Auctoritas, p. 381.
  143. Broughton, vol. II, p. 365.
  144. Der Neue Pauly, Stuttgardiae 1999, T. 7, c. 828.
  145. Tacitus, Annales, xii. 40, Historiae, i. 64.
  146. Cassius Dio, lxvii. 14.

Bibliography