Gegania gens

Last updated

The gens Gegania was an old patrician family at ancient Rome, which was prominent from the earliest period of the Republic to the middle of the fourth century BC. The first of this gens to obtain the consulship was Titus Geganius Macerinus in 492 BC. The gens fell into obscurity even before the Samnite Wars, and is not mentioned again by Roman historians until the final century of the Republic. [1]

Contents

Origin

The Geganii claimed to be descended from Gyas, who accompanied Aeneas to Italy. [2] They were said to be one of the noblest families of the Alban aristocracy, and were incorporated into the Roman state after that city's destruction by Tullus Hostilius. [3] [4] However, according to Plutarch, even before this a Gegania is supposed to have been one of the first Vestal Virgins, appointed by Numa Pompilius. [5] Elsewhere, Plutarch describes a Gegania who was the wife of Servius Tullius, [6] although Dionysius makes her the wife of Lucius Tarquinius Priscus. [7] A third Gegania is mentioned by Plutarch during the time of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus. [8]

Praenomina

The Geganii mentioned in history bore the common praenomina Lucius , Marcus , and Titus , with one example of the rare praenomen Proculus . Those found in inscriptions mostly bore the names Lucius, Sextus , and Marcus, although other praenomina are occasionally found, including Aulus , Publius , and Quintus . As the inscription naming the priest Clesipus Geganius cannot be securely dated, it is unclear what sort of name "Clesipus" is, although it may be a cognomen being used in place of a praenomen, or an instance of the sort of polyonymous nomenclature that was typical of Imperial times. [9]

Branches and cognomina

The only family of the Geganii during the early Republic bore the cognomen Macerinus, a diminutive of Macer, meaning "lean" or "skinny". [1] [10] Epigraphic sources mention a number of Geganii living under the early Empire, bearing a variety of surnames, but there is no evidence of how they were related to their Republican forebears.

Members

This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation.

Undated Geganii

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tarquinia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Tarquinia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome, usually associated with Lucius Tarquinius Priscus and Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the fifth and seventh Kings of Rome. Most of the Tarquinii who appear in history are connected in some way with this dynasty, but a few appear during the later Republic, and others from inscriptions, some dating as late as the fourth century AD.

The gens Pinaria was one of the most ancient patrician families at Rome. According to tradition, the gens originated long before the founding of the city. The Pinarii are mentioned under the kings, and members of this gens attained the highest offices of the Roman state soon after the establishment of the Republic, beginning with Publius Pinarius Mamercinus Rufus, consul in 489 BC.

Marcus Geganius Macerinus was a Roman statesman who served as Consul in 447, 443, and 437 BC, and as Censor in 435 BC.

The gens Ogulnia was an ancient plebeian family at ancient Rome. The gens first came to prominence at the beginning of the third century BC, when the brothers Quintus and Gnaeus Ogulnius, tribunes of the plebs, carried a law opening most of the Roman priesthoods to the plebeians. The only member of the family to obtain the consulship was Quintus Ogulnius Gallus in 269 BC. However, Ogulnii are still found in imperial times.

The gens Peducaea, occasionally written Paeducaea or Peducea, was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens occur in history from the end of the second century BC, and from then to the time of Antoninus Pius, they steadily increased in prominence. The first of the Peducaii to obtain the consulship was Titus Peducaeus in 35 BC.

The gens Quirinia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens appear in history, but several are known from inscriptions.

The gens Racilia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are mentioned as early as the fifth century BC, but few of them achieved any prominence in the Roman state.

The gens Rullia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Scaptia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but they gave their name to the Scaptian tribe, established in 332 BC.

The gens Sellia or Selia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are mentioned in the time of Cicero, but none of them attained any of the higher offices of the Roman state.

The gens Servia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned in ancient writers, but a number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Staia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned by ancient writers, but a number are known from inscriptions. The most illustrious of the Staii was Lucius Staius Murcus, governor of Syria in 44 BC, and a military commander of some ability who served under several leading figures of the period.

The gens Tampia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned in history during the time of Nero, but few achieved any distinction in the Roman state. The nomen Tampius is easily confused with that of Ampius. The most illustrious of the Tampii was Lucius Tampius Flavianus, who held the consulship twice during the latter half of the first century.

The gens Vistilia or Vestilia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. They occur in history during the early part of the first century, and became connected with the imperial family. Only one member of this gens is known to have held any of the higher offices of the Roman state: Sextus Vistilius, who attained the praetorship, was a contemporary and friend of Drusus the Elder.

The gens Tatia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. This gens is perhaps best known from the legendary figure of Titus Tatius, a Sabine king who fought against Romulus, and who subsequently became joint ruler of Rome. None of the Tatii held any of the higher magistracies of the Roman Republic, but a number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tattia was an obscure plebeian or family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but others are known from inscriptions. The most illustrious was probably Gaius Tattius Maximus, an eques who rose to become praetorian prefect under Antoninus Pius.

The gens Tedia or Teidia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Only a few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but they had reached senatorial rank by the first century BC, and Sextus Tedius Valerius Catullus attained the consulship in AD 31. Other Tedii are known from inscriptions.

The gens Thoria was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Only a few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Thorania, also written Torania, was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Only a few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but others are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tituria was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens appear in history, of whom the most famous is Quintus Titurius Sabinus, one of Caesar's legates during the Gallic Wars. Other Titurii are known from inscriptions.

References

  1. 1 2 Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. II, p. 233 ("Gegania Gens").
  2. Servius, Ad Virgilii Aeneidem, v. 117.
  3. Livy, i. 30.
  4. Dionysius, iii. 29.
  5. Plutarch, "The Life of Numa", 10.
  6. Plutarch, De Fortuna Romanorum, p. 323.
  7. Dionysius, iv. 7.
  8. Plutarch, Comparison of Lycurgus and Numa, 3.
  9. See Salomies, "Addenda".
  10. Chase, pp. 109, 110.
  11. Plutarch, "The Life of Numa", 10.
  12. Plutarch, De Fortuna Romanorum, p. 323.
  13. Dionysius, iv. 7.
  14. Plutarch, "Comparison of Lycurgus and Numa", 3.
  15. Livy, ii. 34.
  16. 1 2 Dionysius, vii. 1.
  17. Orosius, ii. 5.
  18. 1 2 Broughton, vol. I, pp. 16, 17.
  19. Livy, iii. 65, iv. 8–10, 17, 22, 24, ix. 33, 34.
  20. Dionysius, xi. 51, 63.
  21. Diodorus Siculus, xii. 29, 33, 43.
  22. Zonaras, vii. 19.
  23. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 50, 51 (and note 1), 53, 58.
  24. Livy, iv. 12.
  25. Diodorus Siculus, xii. 36.
  26. Broughton, vol. I, p. 55.
  27. Livy, vi. 31.
  28. Diodorus Siculus, xv. 57.
  29. Broughton, vol. I, p. 107.
  30. Livy, vi. 42.
  31. Broughton, vol. I, p. 113.
  32. Orosius, v. 17.
  33. CIL XI, 2979.
  34. CIL VI, 4573.
  35. AE 2004, 211.
  36. AE 1978, 80.
  37. AE 1930, 119.
  38. CIL IV, 8424c.
  39. CIL VI, 18946.
  40. NSA, 1916–303.
  41. CIL IV, 10196f.
  42. CIL IV, 8521.
  43. CIL VI, 5393.
  44. CIL VI, 5767.
  45. CIL XI, 6225.
  46. CIL VI, 18952.
  47. CIL XI, 6420.
  48. 1 2 CIL VI, 18950.
  49. 1 2 CIL VI, 18948.
  50. 1 2 CIL XIV, 3347.
  51. AE 2008, 1742.
  52. CIL XIV, 2953.
  53. CIL X, 6488.
  54. CIL X, 8043,060.
  55. NSA, 1919–280.
  56. 1 2 3 CIL VI, 18951.
  57. CIL VI, 18953.
  58. CIL VI, 18947.
  59. CIL XV, 2291.
  60. CIL VI, 18954.
  61. CIL VI, 20299.
  62. CIL VI, 18949.
  63. CIL XII, 4840.

Bibliography