Rural development in Nigeria

Last updated

Since independence, several rural development and extension education programs have been implemented in Nigeria. [1]

In Nigeria, several subsequent governments have implemented different policies in an attempt to develop the rural areas and alleviate the poverty rate that has become a prominent decadence in such areas. However, very little success has been recorded so far.

The first National Development plan spanned between the years 1962–1968, with agriculture being the major priority. The major objective was developing and expanding the production and export of cash crops. But this plan only provided 42% of the capital budget to Agriculture.

It looked to maintain, and if possible, surpass the average rate of growth of 4% per year of its gross domestic product at constant prices [2] . The plan was launched in 1962, two years after independence, and looked to bring about equal distributions of national income; to speed up the rate of economic growth; to generate savings for investments so as to reduce its dependence on external capital for the development of the nation; to get enough capital for the development of manpower; to increase the standard of living of the masses particularly in respect of food, housing, health and clothing and to develop the infrastructure of the nation. [3] Examples such as the Niger Dam show the scope of this ambition. [4] Additionally, the plan aimed to have greater cooperation between public and private sectors, as well as federal and regional governments. [5]

The Plan looked to address Nigeria's newfound postcolonial independence from the British Empire. Under Britain, Nigeria served British interests through the supply of raw material, including agricultural products such as groundnuts, palm oil, and cocoa, which were required by British factories. [6] Furthermore, the plan had to focus on agriculture, as it was still a significant sector of Nigeria's economic, employing a large proportion of the country's population, and a significant contribution to GDP. This was manifest with a yearly investment of 15% of Nigeria's gross national product. [7] This would contribute to a minimum growth rate of 4% annually. [8]

Ultimately, the First National Development Plan failed, the Nigerian government did not provide the amenities which were promised to farmers. Limited resources could not match the ambitions of the plan, with all four allocated settlements under the plan having no storage facilities, electricity, pipe borne water, health centres nor recreational facilities. [9]

In 1970, the second National Development plan was launched by General Yakubu Gowon and it lasted until 1974. Its focus was on balancing the difference between rural and urban development while making an attempt to rectify some of the shortcomings that trailed the first development plan.

Following the Civil War (1967–1970), Nigeria faced the critical need for national reconstruction and the establishment of a united and egalitarian society. The Second National Development Plan was launched to address growing challenges of regional imbalances and promote national reconstruction. This plan differed from previous ones by incorporating a democratic approach, involving stakeholders at various governance levels. [10] This stands out from typical development plans that might be crafted by a central government without considering the input of various groups within the country. The plan received a total funding of ₦71,447,000 naira. [11] Its goals encompassed building a strong nation, fostering social equity, and creating a dynamic economy with ample opportunities. Notably, the plan prioritised reducing the disparity between urban and rural areas. [12]

The initial budget of the plan was ₦3.2 billion naira, but due to the oil boom, it was increased to ₦5.3 billion naira. [13] This oil revenue surge, however, had mixed consequences. While the plan offered increased government revenue and potential for modernisation, it also led to a decline in focus on agriculture, the mainstay of the rural economy. This phenomenon is similar to the concept of Dutch Disease, which describes how the exploitation of a sudden and large natural resource wealth can negatively affect other sectors of the economy. Additionally, mismanagement of revenue made from oil further hampered progress of the plan. The political climate during this period was unstable with several military coups in the 1960s and early 1970s that made rural development efforts challenging. [14] These coups disrupted long-term planning, diverted resources away from agriculture towards military spending, and created uncertainty for investors, hindering investment in the agricultural sector.

Akpabio (2010) argued that the failure of many public policies and programs in Nigeria can be attributed to a disregard for the specific socio-ecological factors within local communities during their execution. [15]  This instability, coupled with a lack of continuity between administrations, meant that projects initiated by one government were often not continued by the next. [16] These factors all contributed to the challenges of implementing the Second National Development Plan.

The Third National Development plan spanned between 1975 and 1980. It made bigger and more ambitious investment programs in various projects than the previous two, with an original investment of ₦30 billion, increasing to ₦43.3 billion, [17] coupled with several macroeconomic projections. [18] The main aim of this development plan was to decrease the gap between food demand, and the government wanted to develop agriculture and use more modern methods across Nigeria which would create a better food supply. [19] Specific programmes were chosen by the government to invest in for development, including the establishment of agricultural development projects (ADPs), the establishment of nine river basin development authority's (RBDAs), the supply of electricity to rural areas from large irrigation dams, commitment of resources to large scale mechanized state farming enterprises, and public efforts at land reforms through the Land Use Act of 1978. [20]

There were several smaller objectives of this plan that would improve the living conditions of Nigeria; increase in per capita income; more even distribution of income; reduction in the level of unemployment; increase in the supply of higher-level manpower; diversification of the economy; balanced development and indigenization of economic activities. [21] The combination of Nigeria's poor agriculture and poor standard of living meant mass funds were necessary to boost the economy.

Humphrey N. Nwosu brought forward some of the key problems surrounding the third national development plan. The development plan was a very complex process that required co-operation from the whole society, which required many resources which the country did not have. [22] For Nigeria to succeed economically, the Nigerian government were aware that an effective transport system was needed, however they did not have enough resources within the country to accomplish this. [23] For example, ₦5.34 billion was to generate approximately 50,000 kilometres of roads during 1975–1980, but this still went on into the fourth development plan. [24] The issues with Nigeria's lack of resources and transportation availability meant the third development plan did not achieve its aim.

The Fourth National development Plan (1981–1985) brought forth new goals for the country to achieve. These goals included: Increasing the income of Nigeria's citizens. Ensuring that income is more evenly distributed amongst the citizens and various socio- economic groups. Reducing the nation's unemployment levels along with under employment. Increasing the workforce's supply of skilled manpower. Broadening out the nation's economy by making it less dependent on a narrow set of industries. Increase the participation of Nigeria's citizens in the management and ownership of its productive industries and enterprises. Ensure that the country becomes more self-sufficient by dependence upon local resources in order to achieve common, social objectives such as: further technological development and advancements, increasing productivity within the workforce and constructing a new national idea revolving around increased discipline, a strong emphasis on a proper work ethic and a cleaner environment. [25]

One of the plan's key features was the usage of resources generated from oil production to increase the economy's production capacity and to ensure self-sustaining economic growth.

Despite Nigeria's economy being heavily centred around the export of oil, with it composing roughly 80% of government revenue, the plans to finance the fourth national development plan via oil revenue ultimately failed. The plan had expected an annual growth rate of 7.4% between 1981 and 1985, with one of its key focuses being agriculture, domestic food production was expected to rise from 16.7 million to 20.2 million tonnes annually. [26]

Despite this the implementation of the fourth national development plan faced many obstacles, its inauguration was delayed for approximately nine months by the Second Republic government of President Shehu Shagari. Following that, financing for the plan was impaired by falling oil revenues along with the government's general reckless spending. Exports too which were predicted to rise by 12.1% fell by 5.9%, mostly due to recession in nations belonging to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation, which reduced demand for African imports. [27]

The Fifth Development Plan and Rolling Plan within Nigeria was established in 1988 to further tackle inequality and boost the economic, social and political structure for the country. This plan sought to devalue the naira, remove import licenses, reduce tariffs, open the economy to foreign trade, promote non-oil exports through incentives and achieve national self-sufficiency in food production. [28] This plan was said to have the vision of improving labour productivity through incentives, privatisation of many public enterprises, and different government measures to create further employment opportunities following the Fourth National Development Plan.

The primary focus of the plan was to correct the structural defects in the economy and create a more self-reliant economy that would largely be regulated by market forces. This led to the linkage between the agricultural and manufacturing sectors of the economy which were to be emphasised during the plan. [29] The fixed five-year plan was abandoned due to the potential of a simplified and more effective plan. General Ibrahim Babangida abandoned the five-year plan in late 1989 for a 3-year rolling plan in its place. [30]

The Fifth Development plan was scrapped in 1990 which began the era of the three-year Rolling plan which spanned from 1990 up until 1993. It was believed that the reason for the abandonment was unlike the National Development Plan, the Rolling Plan could prove more adaptive and resistant to external economic changes and uncertainties. The benefit of the Rolling Plan meant that the design of it allowed for potential annual changes. The benefits included the ability to accommodate estimates, targets and projections for another year. [31]   The objectives of the rolling plan were to reduce inflation and exchange rate instability, maintain infrastructure, achieve agricultural self-sufficiency, and reduce the burden of structural adjustment on the most vulnerable social groups. The accommodation of the rolling plan allowed for economic fundamentals to move in the right direction as it was recorded that during the years 1996-97 the inflation rate declined from 29% to 8.5%. This was also paired with the GDP showing growth as well as stability in the exchange rate. [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Angola</span>

The economy of Angola remains heavily influenced by the effects of four decades of conflict in the last part of the 20th century, the war for independence from Portugal (1961–75) and the subsequent civil war (1975–2002). Poverty since 2002 is reduced over 50% and a third of the population relies on subsistence agriculture. Since 2002, when the 27-year civil war ended, government policy prioritized the repair and improvement of infrastructure and strengthening of political and social institutions. During the first decade of the 21st century, Angola's economy was one of the fastest-growing in the world, with reported annual average GDP growth of 11.1 percent from 2001 to 2010. High international oil prices and rising oil production contributed to strong economic growth, although with high inequality, at that time. 2022 Trade surplus was &30B/2012 $48B

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Cameroon</span>

The economy of Cameroon was one of the most prosperous in Africa for a quarter of a century after independence. The drop in commodity prices for its principal exports – petroleum, cocoa, coffee, and cotton – in the mid-1980s, combined with an overvalued currency and economic mismanagement, led to a decade-long recession. Real per capita GDP fell by more than 60% from 1986 to 1994. The current account and fiscal deficits widened, and foreign debt grew. Yet because of its oil reserves and favorable agricultural conditions, Cameroon still has one of the best-endowed primary commodity economies in sub-Saharan Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Equatorial Guinea</span>

The economy of Equatorial Guinea has traditionally been dependent on commodities such as cocoa and coffee, but is now heavily dependent on petroleum due to the discovery and exploitation of significant oil reserves in the 1980s. In 2017, it graduated from "Least Developed Country" status, one of six Sub-Saharan African nations that managed to do so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Niger</span>

The gross domestic product (GDP) of Niger was $16.617 billion US dollars in 2023, according to official data from the World Bank. This data is based largely on internal markets, subsistence agriculture, and the export of raw commodities: foodstuffs to neighbors and raw minerals to world markets. Niger, a landlocked West African nation that straddles the Sahel, has consistently been ranked on the bottom of the Human Development Index, at 0.394 as of 2019. It has a very low per capita income, and ranks among the least developed and most heavily indebted countries in the world, despite having large raw commodities and a relatively stable government and society not currently affected by civil war or terrorism. Economic activity centers on subsistence agriculture, animal husbandry, re-export trade, and export of uranium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural sociology</span> Branch of sociology

Rural sociology is a field of sociology traditionally associated with the study of social structure and conflict in rural areas. It is an active academic field in much of the world, originating in the United States in the 1910s with close ties to the national Department of Agriculture and land-grant university colleges of agriculture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural area</span> Geographic area outside towns and cities

In general, a rural area or a countryside is a geographic area that is located outside towns and cities. Typical rural areas have a low population density and small settlements. Agricultural areas and areas with forestry are typically described as rural, as well as other areas lacking substantial development. Different countries have varying definitions of rural for statistical and administrative purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Africa</span>

The economy of Africa consists of the trade, industry, agriculture, and human resources of the continent. As of 2019, approximately 1.3 billion people were living in 53 countries in Africa. Africa is a resource-rich continent. Recent growth has been due to growth in sales, commodities, services, and manufacturing. West Africa, East Africa, Central Africa and Southern Africa in particular, are expected to reach a combined GDP of $29 trillion by 2050.

The Licence Raj or Permit Raj is a pejorative for the system of strict government control and regulation of the Indian economy that was in place from the 1950s to the early 1990s. Under this system, businesses in India were required to obtain licences from the government in order to operate, and these licences were often difficult to obtain.

The economic history of Nigeria falls into three periods. They are the: pre-colonial, the colonial and the post-colonial or independence periods. The pre-colonial period covers the longest the part of Nigerian history. The colonial period covers a period of 60 years, 1900-1960 while the independence period dates from October 1, 1960.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in Nigeria</span> Overview of agriculture in Nigeria

Agriculture is a sector of the Nigerian economy, accounting for up to 35% of total employment in 2020. According to the FAO, agriculture remains the foundation of the Nigerian economy, providing livelihoods for most Nigerians and generating millions of jobs. Along with crude oil, Nigeria relies on the agricultural products it exports to generate most of its national revenue. The agricultural sector in Nigeria comprises four sub-sectors: crop production, livestock, forestry, and fishing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural development</span> Improving quality of life in rural areas

Rural development is the process of improving the quality of life and economic well-being of people living in rural areas, often relatively isolated and sparsely populated areas. Often, rural regions have experienced rural poverty, poverty greater than urban or suburban economic regions due to lack of access to economic activities, and lack of investments in key infrastructure such as education.

The economic development in India followed socialist-inspired politicians for most of its independent history, including state-ownership of many sectors; India's per capita income increased at only around 1% annualised rate in the three decades after its independence. Since the mid-1980s, India has slowly opened up its markets through economic liberalisation. After more fundamental reforms since 1991 and their renewal in the 2000s, India has progressed towards a free market economy. The Indian economy is still performing well, with foreign investment and looser regulations driving significant growth in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in Ghana</span> Agricultural activity in Ghana

Agriculture in Ghana consists of a variety of agricultural products and is an established economic sector, providing employment on a formal and informal basis. It is represented by the Ministry of Food and Agriculture. Ghana produces a variety of crops in various climatic zones which range from dry savanna to wet forest which run in east–west bands across Ghana. Agricultural crops, including yams, grains, cocoa, oil palms, kola nuts, and timber, form the base of agriculture in Ghana's economy. In 2013 agriculture employed 53.6% of the total labor force in Ghana.

Rural economics is the study of rural economies. Rural economies include both agricultural and non-agricultural industries, so rural economics has broader concerns than agricultural economics which focus more on food systems. Rural development and finance attempt to solve larger challenges within rural economics. These economic issues are often connected to the migration from rural areas due to lack of economic activities and rural poverty. Some interventions have been very successful in some parts of the world, with rural electrification and rural tourism providing anchors for transforming economies in some rural areas. These challenges often create rural-urban income disparities.

The economic liberalisation in India refers to the series of policy changes aimed at opening up the country's economy to the world, with the objective of making it more market-oriented and consumption-driven. The goal was to expand the role of private and foreign investment, which was seen as a means of achieving economic growth and development. Although some attempts at liberalisation were made in 1966 and the early 1980s, a more thorough liberalisation was initiated in 1991.

The Five-Year Plans are a series of social and economic development initiatives issued by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) since 1953 in the People's Republic of China. Since 1949, the CCP has shaped the Chinese economy through the plenums of its Central Committee and national party congresses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic history of Iran</span>

Prior to 1979, Iran's economic development was rapid. Traditionally an agrarian society, by the 1970s the country had undergone significant industrialization and economic modernization. This pace of growth had slowed dramatically by 1978 as capital flight reached $30 to $40 billion 1980 US dollars just before the revolution.

Nigeria had one of the world's highest economic growth rates, averaging 7.4% according to the Nigeria economic report that was released in July 2019 by the World Bank. Following the oil price collapse in 2014–2016, combined with negative production shocks, the gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate dropped to 2.7% in 2015. In 2016 during its first recession in 25 years, the economy contracted by 1.6%. Nationally, 43 percent of Nigerians live below the poverty line, while another 25 percent are vulnerable. For a country with massive wealth and a huge population to support commerce, a well-developed economy, and plenty of natural resources such as oil, the level of poverty remains unacceptable. However, poverty may have been overestimated due to the lack of information on the extremely huge informal sector of the economy, estimated at around 60% more, of the current GDP figures. As of 2018, the population growth rate is higher than the economic growth rate, leading to a slow rise in poverty. According to a 2018 report by the World Bank, almost half the population is living below the international poverty line, and unemployment peaked at 23.1%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in Nigeria</span> Emissions, impacts and response of Nigeria related to climate change

Climate change in Nigeria is evident from temperature increase, rainfall variability. It is also reflected in drought, desertification, rising sea levels, erosion, floods, thunderstorms, bush fires, landslides, land degradation, more frequent, extreme weather conditions and loss of biodiversity. All of which continues to negatively affect human and animal life and also the ecosystems in Nigeria. Although, depending on the location, regions experience climate change with significant higher temperatures during the dry seasons while rainfalls during rainy seasons help keep the temperature at milder levels. The effects of climate change prompted the World Meteorological Organization, in its 40th Executive Council 1988, to establish a new international scientific assessment panel to be called the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The 2007 IPCC's fourth and final Assessment Report (AR4) revealed that there is a considerable threat of climate change that requires urgent global attention. The report further attributed the present global warming to largely anthropogenic practices. The Earth is almost at a point of no return as it faces environmental threats which include atmospheric and marine pollution, global warming, ozone depletion, the dangers of pollution by nuclear and other hazardous substances, and the extinction of various wildlife species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tourism in Estonia</span> Overview of the tourism industry in Estonia

Tourism in Estonia refers to the overall state of the tourism industry in the Baltic nation of Estonia. It is a key part of the country's economy, contributing 7.8% to its GDP, and employing 4.3% of its population. In 2018, tourism and other related services counted for over 10.8 percent of Estonia's exports. Tourism is increasing rapidly in Estonia: the number of tourist arrivals—both domestic and international—has increased from 2.26 million in 2006 to 3.79 million in 2019. Estonia was also ranked the 15th-most safest country to visit in 2017, according to safedestinations.com, scoring 8.94 out of 10 on their list. In a 2018 report published by the OECD, they concluded that most international tourists come from places like Finland, Russia, Latvia, Germany, and Sweden.

References

  1. Ibenegbu, George. "Rural development in Nigeria: Top facts every Nigerian should know" . Retrieved 31 March 2018.
  2. Akpan, Nseabasi S. (2012). "Rural Development in Nigeria: A Review of Pre- and Post-Independence Practice'". Journal of Sociological Research. 3 (2): 150. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302.
  3. Iheanacho, Emmanuel N. (2014). "National Development Planning in Nigeria: An Endless Search for Appropriate Development Strategy". International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment. 5 (2): 51/52.
  4. Iheanacho, Emmanuel N. (2014). "National Development Planning in Nigeria: An Endless Search for Appropriate Development Strategy". International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment. 5 (2): 52. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302.
  5. Akpe Churchill Ikechukwu, Godbless; Juliana, Ozimonu (2019). "Nigeria development plans and its challenges: the way forward". International Journal of Advanced Academic Research. 5 (12): 4.{{cite journal}}: Text "Social and Management Sciences" ignored (help)
  6. Iheanacho, Emmanuel N. (2014). "National Development Planning in Nigeria: An Endless Search for Appropriate Development Strategy". International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment. 5 (2): 51.
  7. Akpan, Nseabasi S. (2012). "Rural Development in Nigeria: A Review of Pre- and Post-Independence Practice'". Journal of Sociological Research. 3 (2): 149. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302.
  8. Akpe Churchill Ikechukwu, Godbless; Ozimonu Emeto, Juliana (2019). "Nigeria development plans and its challenges: the way forward". International Journal of Advanced Academic Research. 5 (12): 4. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302.{{cite journal}}: Text "Social and Management Sciences" ignored (help)
  9. Dibua, J.I (1989). "Government's Agricultural Policy and Rural Development in Nigeria: The Case of Bendel State 1964-1988". The African Review: A Journal of African Politics, Development and International Affairs. 16 (1/2): 42. JSTOR   45341563.
  10. Akpan, Nseabasi S. (2012-08-27). "Rural Development in Nigeria: A Review of Pre- and Post-independence Practice". Journal of Sociological Research. 3 (2). doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302. ISSN   1948-5468.
  11. Akpan, Nseabasi S. (2012-08-27). "Rural Development in Nigeria: A Review of Pre- and Post-independence Practice". Journal of Sociological Research. 3 (2). doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302. ISSN   1948-5468.
  12. Akpan, Nseabasi S. (2012-08-27). "Rural Development in Nigeria: A Review of Pre- and Post-independence Practice". Journal of Sociological Research. 3 (2). doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302. ISSN   1948-5468.
  13. Odo, John Onyemaechi (2018-09-09). "Adoption of IFRS in Nigeria: Challenges and the Way Forward". International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 8 (8). doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i8/4493. ISSN   2222-6990.
  14. Odo, John Onyemaechi (2018-09-09). "Adoption of IFRS in Nigeria: Challenges and the Way Forward". International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 8 (8). doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i8/4493. ISSN   2222-6990.
  15. Akpabio, Emmanuel M.; Akpan, Nseabasi S. (May 2010). "Governance and Oil Politics in Nigeria's Niger Delta: The Question of Distributive Equity". Journal of Human Ecology. 30 (2): 111–121. doi:10.1080/09709274.2010.11906280. ISSN   0970-9274.
  16. Odo, John Onyemaechi (2018-09-09). "Adoption of IFRS in Nigeria: Challenges and the Way Forward". International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 8 (8). doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i8/4493. ISSN   2222-6990.
  17. Akpan, Nseabasi S. (2012). "Rural Development in Nigeria: A review of Pre- and Post-Independence Practice". Journal of Sociological Research. 3 (2): 150. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302.
  18. P. Adegbe. "THE THIRD NATIONAL DEAVELOPMENT PLAN IN NIGERIA: ANALTICAL PERSPECTIVE" . Retrieved 31 March 2018.
  19. Akpan, Nseabasi S. (2012). "Rural Development in Nigeria: A review of Pre- and Post-Independence Practice". Journal of Sociological Research. 3 (2): 150. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302.
  20. Akpan, Nseabasi S. (2012). "Rural Development in Nigeria: A review of Pre- and Post-Independence Practice". Journal of Sociological Research. 3 (2): 150–151. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2302.
  21. Iheanacho, Emmanuel N. (2014). "National Development Planning in Nigeria: An Endless Search for Appropriate Development Strategy" (PDF). International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment. 5 (2): 53. Retrieved 2024-03-18.
  22. Nwosu, Humphrey N. (1977). "Nigerias Third National Development Plan, 1975-80: Major Problems to Implementation". Africa Today. 24 (4): 23. JSTOR   4185728.{{cite journal}}: More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help)
  23. Nwosu, Humphrey N. (1977). "Nigerias Third National Development Plan, 1975-80: Major Problems to Implementation". Africa Today. 24 (4): 24. JSTOR   4185728.
  24. Nwosu, Humphrey N. (1977). "Nigerias Third National Development Plan, 1975-80: Major Problems to Implementation". Africa Today. 24 (4): 26. JSTOR   4185728.
  25. . S2CID   456425.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)
  26. Ogbonna, Michael (1982). "The Prospects of Financing Nigeria's Fourth Development Plan 1981-1985 from Oil Revenues". Africa Spectrum. 17 (2): 195–204. ISSN   0002-0397. JSTOR   40174066.
  27. Amuwo, Adekunle (2008). Nigeria's national development plans (Report). Institute for Global Dialogue. pp. 27–33.
  28. Ugwuanyi, Okpara, Umuahia, Georgine Obinne, Michael, Umudike (2014). "The Economic Implications of the National Development Plans: The Nigerian Experiance" (PDF). Developing Country Studies. 4: 170–172.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. Iheanacho, Emannuel N. (2014). "National Development Planning in Nigeria: An Endless Search for Appropriate Development Strategy" (PDF). International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment. 5: 55.
  30. Ugwuanyi, Okra, Umuahia, Georgina Obinne, Micheal, Umudike (2014). "The Economic Implications of National Development Plans: The Nigerian Experience (1946-2013)" (PDF). Developing Country Studies. 4: 174.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. Amuwo, Adekunle (2008). "Nigerias National development plans". CONSTRUCTING THE DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENTAL STATE IN AFRICA: A Case Study of Nigeria: 1960-2007: 30.
  32. Ukah, O.C. (2008). "An Appraisal of the Performance of the Nigerias National Rolling Plans in the 90s". African Research Review. 1: 22. doi:10.4314/afrrev.v1i1.40987.