Dutch disease

Last updated

In economics, Dutch disease is the apparent causal relationship between the increase in the economic development of a specific sector (for example natural resources) and a decline in other sectors (like the manufacturing sector or agriculture).

Contents

The term was coined in 1977 by The Economist to describe the decline of the manufacturing sector in the Netherlands after the discovery of the large Groningen natural gas field in 1959. [1]

The presumed mechanism is that while revenues increase in a growing sector (or inflows of foreign aid), the given economy's currency becomes stronger (appreciates) compared to foreign currencies (manifested in the exchange rate). This results in the country's other exports becoming more expensive for other countries to buy, while imports become cheaper, altogether rendering those sectors less competitive.

While it most often refers to natural resource discovery, it can also refer to "any development that results in a large inflow of foreign currency, including a sharp surge in natural resource prices, foreign assistance, and foreign direct investment". [2]

Model

Natural gas concessions in the Netherlands (June 2008), the Netherlands accounts for more than 25% of all natural gas reserves in the EU. Natural gas NL.png
Natural gas concessions in the Netherlands (June 2008), the Netherlands accounts for more than 25% of all natural gas reserves in the EU.

The classic economic model describing Dutch disease was developed by the economists W. Max Corden and J. Peter Neary in 1982. In the model, there is a non-tradable sector (which includes services) and two tradable sectors: the booming sector, and the lagging (or non-booming) tradable sector. The booming sector is usually the extraction of natural resources such as oil, natural gas, gold, copper, diamonds or bauxite, or the production of crops, such as coffee or cocoa. The lagging sector is usually manufacturing or agriculture.

A resource boom affects this economy in two ways:

  1. In the "resource movement effect", the resource boom increases demand for labor, which causes production to shift toward the booming sector, away from the lagging sector. This shift in labor from the lagging sector to the booming sector is called direct deindustrialization. However, this effect can be negligible, since the hydrocarbon and mineral sectors tend to employ few people. [3]
  2. The "spending effect" occurs as a result of the extra revenue brought in by the resource boom. It increases demand for labor in the non-tradable sector (services), at the expense of the lagging sector. This shift from the lagging sector to the non-tradable sector is called indirect deindustrialization. [3] The increased demand for non-traded goods increases their price. However, prices in the traded good sector are set internationally, so they cannot change. This amounts to an increase in the real exchange rate. [4]

Resource-based international trade

In a model of international trade based on resource endowments as the Heckscher–Ohlin/Heckscher–Ohlin-Vanek, the Dutch disease can be explained by the Rybczynski theorem.

Effects

Simple trade models suggest that a country should specialize in industries in which it has a comparative advantage; thus a country rich in some natural resources would be better off specializing in the extraction of those natural resources.

However, other theories suggest that this is detrimental, for example when the natural resources deplete. Also, prices may decrease and competitive manufacturing cannot return as quickly as it left. This may happen because technological growth is smaller in the booming sector and the non-tradable sector than the non-booming tradable sector. [5] Because that economy had smaller technological growth than did other countries, its comparative advantage in non-booming tradable goods will have shrunk, thus leading firms not to invest in the tradables sector. [6]

Also, volatility in the price of natural resources, and thus the real exchange rate, limits investment by private firms, because firms will not invest if they are not sure what the future economic conditions will be. [7] Commodity exports such as raw materials drive up the value of the currency. This is what leads to the lack of competition in the other sectors of the economy. The extraction of natural resources is also extremely capital intensive, resulting in few new jobs being created. [8]

Minimization

There are three basic ways to reduce the threat of Dutch disease: (1) slowing the appreciation of the real exchange rate, (2) boosting the competitiveness of the adversely affected sectors, and (3) demographic adaptation. One approach is to withhold the boom revenues, that is, not to bring all the revenues into the country all at once, and to save some of the revenues abroad in special funds and bring them in slowly. In developing countries, this can be politically difficult as there is often pressure to spend the boom revenues immediately to alleviate poverty, but this ignores broader macroeconomic implications.

Withholding shall reduce the spending effect, alleviating some of the effects of inflation. Another benefit of letting the revenues into the country slowly is that it can give a country a stable revenue stream, giving more certainty to revenues from year to year. Also, by saving the boom revenues, a country is saving some of the revenues for future generations. Examples of these sovereign wealth funds include the Australian Government Future Fund, Iranian national development fund, the Government Pension Fund in Norway, the Stabilization Fund of the Russian Federation, the State Oil Fund of Azerbaijan, Alberta Heritage Savings Trust Fund of Alberta, Canada, the Permanent School Fund and Permanent University Fund of Texas, the Alaska Permanent Fund and the Future Generations Fund of the State of Kuwait established in 1976. Recent[ when? ] talks led by the United Nations Development Programme in Cambodia – International Oil and Gas Conference on fueling poverty reduction – point out the need for better education of state officials and energy CaDREs (Capacity Needs Diagnostics for Renewable Energies) linked to a sovereign wealth fund to avoid the resource curse (Paradox of plenty). [9]

Another strategy for avoiding real exchange rate appreciation is to increase saving in the economy in order to reduce large capital inflows which may appreciate the real exchange rate. This can be done if the country runs a budget surplus. A country can encourage individuals and firms to save more by reducing income and profit taxes. By increasing saving, a country can reduce the need for loans to finance government deficits and foreign direct investment.

Investments in education and infrastructure can increase the competitiveness of the lagging manufacturing or agriculture sector. Another approach is government protectionism of the lagging sector, that is, increase in subsidies or tariffs. However, this could worsen the effects of Dutch disease, as large inflows of foreign capital are usually provided by the export sector and bought up by the import sector. Imposing tariffs on imported goods will artificially reduce that sector's demand for foreign currency, leading to further appreciation of the real exchange rate. [10]

Diagnosis

It is usually difficult to be certain that a country has Dutch disease because it is difficult to prove the relationship between an increase in natural resource revenues, the real-exchange rate, and a decline in the lagging sector. An appreciation in the real exchange rate could be caused by other things such as productivity increases in the Balassa-Samuelson effect, changes in the terms of trade and large capital inflows. [11] Often these capital inflows are caused by foreign direct investment or to finance a country's debt. However, evidence does exist suggesting that unexpected and very large oil and gas discoveries do cause the appreciation of the real exchange rate and the decline of the lagging sector across affected countries on average. [12]

Examples

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Grenada</span>

The economy of Grenada is largely tourism-based, small, and open economy. Over the past two decades, the main thrust of Grenada's economy has shifted from agriculture to services, with tourism serving as the leading foreign currency earning sector. The country's principal export crops are the spices nutmeg and mace. Other crops for export include cocoa, citrus fruits, bananas, cloves, and cinnamon. Manufacturing industries in Grenada operate mostly on a small scale, including production of beverages and other foodstuffs, textiles, and the assembly of electronic components for export.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Indonesia</span>

The economy of Indonesia is a mixed economy with dirigiste characteristics, and it is one of the emerging market economies in the world and the largest in Southeast Asia. As an upper-middle income country and member of the G20, Indonesia is classified as a newly industrialized country. Estimated at over 21 quadrillion rupiah in 2023, it is the 16th largest economy in the world by nominal GDP and the 7th largest in terms of GDP (PPP). Indonesia's internet economy reached US$77 billion in 2022, and is expected to cross the US$130 billion mark by 2025. Indonesia depends on the domestic market and government budget spending and its ownership of state-owned enterprises. The administration of prices of a range of basic goods also plays a significant role in Indonesia's market economy. However, since the 1990s, the majority of the economy has been controlled by individual Indonesians and foreign companies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Pakistan</span>

The economy of Pakistan is categorized as a developing economy. It ranks as the 24th-largest based on GDP using purchasing power parity (PPP) and the 46th largest in terms of nominal GDP. With a population of 232 million people as of 2023, Pakistan’s position at per capita income ranks 161st by GDP (nominal) and 138th by GDP (PPP) according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Seychelles</span>

The economy of Seychelles is based on fishing, tourism, processing of coconuts and vanilla, coir rope, boat building, printing, furniture and beverages. Agricultural products include cinnamon, sweet potatoes, cassava (tapioca), bananas, poultry and tuna.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exchange rate</span> Rate at which one currency will be exchanged for another

In finance, an exchange rate is the rate at which one currency will be exchanged for another currency. Currencies are most commonly national currencies, but may be sub-national as in the case of Hong Kong or supra-national as in the case of the euro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Balance of payments</span> Difference between the inflow and outflow of money to a country at a given time

In international economics, the balance of payments of a country is the difference between all money flowing into the country in a particular period of time and the outflow of money to the rest of the world. In other words, it is economic transactions between countries during a period of time. These financial transactions are made by individuals, firms and government bodies to compare receipts and payments arising out of trade of goods and services.

In economics, hot money is the flow of funds from one country to another in order to earn a short-term profit on interest rate differences and/or anticipated exchange rate shifts. These speculative capital flows are called "hot money" because they can move very quickly in and out of markets, potentially leading to market instability.

Petrocurrency is a word used with three distinct meanings, often confused:

  1. Dollars paid to oil-producing nations —a term invented in the 1970s meaning trading surpluses of oil-producing nations.
  2. Currencies of oil-producing nations which tend to rise in value against other currencies when the price of oil rises.
  3. Pricing of oil in US dollars: currencies used as a unit of account to price oil in the international market.

Foreign exchange reserves are cash and other reserve assets such as gold held by a central bank or other monetary authority that are primarily available to balance payments of the country, influence the foreign exchange rate of its currency, and to maintain confidence in financial markets. Reserves are held in one or more reserve currencies, nowadays mostly the United States dollar and to a lesser extent the euro.

The Balassa–Samuelson effect, also known as Harrod–Balassa–Samuelson effect, the Ricardo–Viner–Harrod–Balassa–Samuelson–Penn–Bhagwati effect, or productivity biased purchasing power parity (PPP) is the tendency for consumer prices to be systematically higher in more developed countries than in less developed countries. This observation about the systematic differences in consumer prices is called the "Penn effect". The Balassa–Samuelson hypothesis is the proposition that this can be explained by the greater variation in productivity between developed and less developed countries in the traded goods' sectors which in turn affects wages and prices in the non-tradable goods sectors.

The resource curse, also known as the paradox of plenty or the poverty paradox, is the phenomenon of countries with an abundance of natural resources having less economic growth, less democracy, or worse development outcomes than countries with fewer natural resources. There are many theories and much academic debate about the reasons for and exceptions to the adverse outcomes. Most experts believe the resource curse is not universal or inevitable but affects certain types of countries or regions under certain conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic history of Brazil</span>

The economic history of Brazil covers various economic events and traces the changes in the Brazilian economy over the course of the history of Brazil. Portugal, which first colonized the area in the 16th century, enforced a colonial pact with Brazil, an imperial mercantile policy, which drove development for the subsequent three centuries. Independence was achieved in 1822. Slavery was fully abolished in 1888. Important structural transformations began in the 1930s, when important steps were taken to change Brazil into a modern, industrialized economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the Middle East</span>

The economy of the Middle East is very diverse, with national economies ranging from hydrocarbon-exporting rentiers to centralized socialist economies and free-market economies. The region is best known for oil production and export, which significantly impacts the entire region through the wealth it generates and through labor utilization. In recent years, many of the countries in the region have undertaken efforts to diversify their economies.

A sudden stop in capital flows is defined as a sudden slowdown in private capital inflows into emerging market economies, and a corresponding sharp reversal from large current account deficits into smaller deficits or small surpluses. Sudden stops are usually followed by a sharp decrease in output, private spending and credit to the private sector, and real exchange rate depreciation. The term “sudden stop” was inspired by a banker’s comment on a paper by Rüdiger Dornbusch and Alejandro Werner about Mexico, that “it is not speed that kills, it is the sudden stop”.

The economic history of Ecuador covers the development of Ecuador's economy throughout its history, beginning with colonization by the Spanish Empire, through independence and up to the 21st century.

An oil boom is a period of largeinflow of income as a result of high global oil prices or large oil production in an economy. Generally, this short period initially brings economic benefits, in terms of increased GDP growth, but might later lead to a resource curse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baltic states housing bubble</span> Economic bubble involving major cities of Baltic states in 2000s

The Baltic states' housing bubble was an economic bubble involving major cities in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The three Baltic countries had enjoyed a relatively strong economic growth between 2000 and 2006, and the real estate sectors had performed well since 2000. In fact, in between 2005Q1 and 2007Q1, the official house price index for Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania recorded a sharp jump of 104.6%, 134.3% and 106.7%. By comparison, the official house price index for Euro Area increased by 11.8% for a similar time period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian financial crisis (2014–2016)</span> Period of devaluation of the Russian rouble, linked to the Crimean conflict

The financial crisis in Russia in 2014–2016 was the result of the sharp devaluation of the Russian rouble beginning in the second half of 2014. A decline in confidence in the Russian economy caused investors to sell off their Russian assets, which led to a decline in the value of the Russian rouble and sparked fears of a financial crisis. The lack of confidence in the Russian economy stemmed from at least two major sources. The first is the fall in the price of oil in 2014. Crude oil, a major export of Russia, declined in price by nearly 50% between its yearly high in June 2014 and 16 December 2014. The second is the result of international economic sanctions imposed on Russia following Russia's annexation of Crimea, the war in Donbas and the broader Russo-Ukrainian War.

Since becoming an independent country, Ivory Coast has transitioned from an economy dominated by agriculture—coffee and cocoa in particular—to a diversified economy with a large service sector. From 1960 to 1976, government policy focused on investing revenues from agricultural export into infrastructure. From 1976 to 1980, factors such as a boom-bust in coffee and cocoa prices, over-investment funded by foreign debt, and a devaluation of the US Dollar led Ivory Coast to the brink of financial crisis. Decreased revenues from coffee and cocoa exports continued into the 80's and early 90's, increasing the burden of foreign debt and eventually requiring lender negotiation. This resulted in the privatization of many state-owned enterprises with mixed levels of success. In 1994, the economy began a comeback due to devaluation of the CFA franc, increased export revenues, financial reforms, and debt rescheduling. Since then the economy has been impacted by and rebounded from political crises such as the 1999 coup d'état and the 2011 election crisis.

The economy of Iran has been stagnated for several years since the Islamic Revolution. The economic recession was intensified in early 1990s. Thus, it is necessary to make serious decisions in processing macroeconomic variables. In early 2010s, the real GDP trend experienced serious changes, and the economic recession was intensified with a drop in oil prices and the subsequent reduction in domestic and foreign exchange earnings. In economic literature, the overall macroeconomic performance deviation from the long-term growth is called the business cycle. Clearly, a better understanding of recession in the economy of Iran is crucial in economic policies.

References

  1. "The Dutch Disease" (PDF). The Economist. 26 November 1977. pp. 82–83.
  2. Ebrahim-zadeh, Christine (March 2003). "Back to Basics – Dutch Disease: Too much wealth managed unwisely". Finance and Development, A quarterly magazine of the IMF. IMF. Archived from the original on 4 July 2008. Retrieved 17 June 2008. This syndrome has come to be known as "Dutch disease". Although the disease is generally associated with a natural resource discovery, it can occur from any development that results in a large inflow of foreign currency, including a sharp surge in natural resource prices, foreign assistance, and foreign direct investment. Economists have used the Dutch disease model to examine such episodes, including the impact of the flow of American treasures into sixteenth-century Spain and gold discoveries in Australia in the 1850s.
  3. 1 2 Corden WM (1984). "Boom Sector and Dutch Disease Economics: Survey and Consolidation". Oxford Economic Papers. 36 (3): 362. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041643.
  4. Corden WM, Neary JP (1982). "Booming Sector and De-industrialisation in a Small Open Economy" (PDF). The Economic Journal. 92 (December): 825–48. doi:10.2307/2232670. JSTOR   2232670. S2CID   154188130.
  5. Van Wijnbergen, Sweder (1984). "The 'Dutch Disease': A Disease After All?". The Economic Journal. 94 (373): 41–55. doi:10.2307/2232214. JSTOR   2232214. S2CID   154545481.
  6. Krugman, Paul (1987). "The Narrow Moving Band, the Dutch Disease, and the Competitive Consequences of Mrs. Thatcher". Journal of Development Economics. 27 (1–2): 50. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(87)90005-8.
  7. Gylfason, Thorvaldur; Herbertsson, Tryggvi Thor; Zoega, Gylfi (1999). "A Mixed Blessing". Macroeconomic Dynamics. 3 (2): 204–225. doi:10.1017/S1365100599011049. S2CID   152313708.
  8. "It's only natural". The Economist. 9 September 2010.
  9. Karl, Terry Lynn (1997). The paradox of plenty : oil booms and petro-states. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN   9780520918696. OCLC   42855014.
  10. Collier, Paul (2007). "The Bottom Billion". Oxford University Press, p. 162
  11. De Gregorio, José; Wolf, Wolger C. (1994). "Terms of Trade, Productivity, and the Real Exchange Rate". NBER Working Paper No. 4807. SSRN   6891.
  12. Harding, Torfinn; Stefanski, Radek; Toews, Gerhard (August 2020). "Boom Goes the Price: Giant Resource Discoveries and Real Exchange Rate Appreciation". The Economic Journal. 130 (630): 1715–1728. doi: 10.1093/ej/ueaa016 . hdl: 10023/20503 .
  13. 1 2 Corden (1984), 359
  14. Drelichman, Mauricio (1 July 2005). "The curse of Moctezuma: American silver and the Dutch disease". Explorations in Economic History. 42 (3): 349–80. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.195.9994 . doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2004.10.005.
  15. Shehabi, Manal (July 2020). "Quantifying Dutch disease effects and asymmetry in economic responses to oil price volatility in Kuwait". The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
  16. McCawley, Peter (March 1980). "Indonesia's New Balance of Payments Problem: a Surplus to get rid of". Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Indonesia. 28 (1): 39–58.
  17. Bjørnland, Hilde (1998). "The Economic Effects of North Sea Oil on the Manufacturing Sector". Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 45 (5): 553–585. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.580.6055 . doi:10.1111/1467-9485.00112.
  18. Evans-Pritchard, Ambrose (10 October 2016). "Britain should embrace weaker pound and it needs to fall further, says former BoE governor and currency guru". Telegraph. Retrieved 26 March 2017.
  19. Christensen, John; Shaxson, Nick; and Wigan Duncan (5 January 2016). "The Finance Curse: Britain and the World Economy". The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
  20. Kaminska, Isabella (12 October 2016). "Brexit and Britain's dutch disease". The Financial Times.
  21. Mody, Ashoka (18 November 2016). "Unwinding of the pound carry trade". voxeu.org
  22. Krugman, Paul (11 October 2016). "Notes on Brexit and the Pound". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 October 2016.
  23. MacAskill, Andrew (24 March 2017). "How banks lost the ear of Britain's government over Brexit". Reuters. Retrieved 26 March 2017.
  24. Armstrong, Angus (14 October 2016). "Pound in your pocket". National Institute of Economic and Social Research. Archived from the original on 1 July 2020. Retrieved 26 March 2017.
  25. "Our Continent, Our Future" Archived 16 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine , Mkandawire, T. and C. Soludo. "In most recent attempts to explain Africa's performance with growth and investment regressions, studies find that inaccessible location, poor port facilities, and the 'Dutch Disease' syndrome, caused by large natural-resource endowments, constitute serious impediments to investment and growth".
  26. McCoy, Jennifer L; Smith, William C. (Summer 1995). "Democratic disequilibrium in Venezuela". Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs . 37 (2): 113.
  27. Sisira Jayasuriya and Peter McCawley (2008), "Reconstruction after a Major Disaster: Lessons from the Post-tsunami Experience in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand", ADBI Working Paper No 125.
  28. Lee Greenberg (20 July 2011). "Growing Equalization Payments to Ontario Threaten Country". National Post.
  29. Michel Beine; Charles S. Bos; Serge Coulombe (January 2009). "Does the Canadian economy suffer from Dutch Disease?" (PDF).
  30. "Strong forex inflows now hurting economy", GMANews.TV.
  31. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 March 2012. Retrieved 2 December 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  32. Peter Martin (30 August 2012). "Warning: After the boom it'll be Dutch and go". Sydney Morning Herald.
  33. Paul Cleary (11 November 2007). "Mining boom could bust us". Melbourne: The Age.
  34. Peter Ker; Ben Schniders (6 September 2011). "Labor woeful on economic reform, Says Argus". The Sydney Morning Herald.
  35. "Dutch Disease Hits Russia" Archived 28 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine , Latsis, O. (2005). Moscow News, 8–14 June.
  36. Mining accounts for most of the economic growth
  37. "Boom and gloom". The Economist. 8 March 2007.
  38. Kwon, Doris; Sorenson, Olav (13 September 2021). "The Silicon Valley Syndrome" (PDF).{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  39. Oliver, Steven; Jablonski, Ryan; Hastings, Justin V. (2017). "The Tortuga Disease: The Perverse Effects of Illicit Foreign Capital" (PDF). International Studies Quarterly. 61 (2): 312. doi:10.1093/isq/sqw051.
  40. https://www.nytimes.com/1982/03/07/magazine/world-s-richest-little-isle.html
  41. https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2014/11/05/what-dutch-disease-is-and-why-its-bad
  42. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true&year_high_desc=true
  43. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/nauru/

Further reading