"},"replaced":{"wt":""},"capacity":{"wt":"36 passenger seats;
34 standing places"},"operator":{"wt":"[[Helsinki City Transport|HKL]]"},"length":{"wt":"11 730 mm"},"width":{"wt":"2 500 mm"},"height":{"wt":"3 150 mm"},"floortype":{"wt":""},"doors":{"wt":""},"weight":{"wt":"12 000 kg"},"chassis":{"wt":"[[body-on-frame]]"},"engine":{"wt":"[[Deutz AG|Deutz]] [[Diesel engine|diesel]] 50 kW"},"powerout":{"wt":"''max.'': 200 kW;
''nominal'': 110 kW"},"transmission":{"wt":"electric / [[Diesel-electric transmission|diesel-electric]]{{cite web |url= http://www.raitio.org/trolley/helsinki/hklsws/elvyty.pdf |title= Johdinautoliikenteen elvytyspyrkimykset ja Koejohdinautoprojekti |last1= Alameri |first1= Mikko |year= 1987 |publisher= Suomen Raitiotieseura ry (orig. Raitio 4/1987) |access-date= 2013-03-29}}"},"options":{"wt":""}},"i":0}}]}" id="mwAg">Motor vehicle
SWS | |
---|---|
Overview | |
Manufacturer | Oy Suomen Autoteollisuus Ab Oy Wiima Ab Oy Strömberg Ab [1] [2] |
Body and chassis | |
Chassis | body-on-frame |
Powertrain | |
Engine | Deutz diesel 50 kW |
Capacity | 36 passenger seats; 34 standing places [2] |
Power output | max.: 200 kW; nominal: 110 kW [3] |
Transmission | electric / diesel-electric [3] |
Dimensions | |
Length | 11 730 mm |
Width | 2 500 mm |
Height | 3 150 mm [2] |
Curb weight | 12 000 kg |
SWS is a hybrid trolleybus prototype that was developed and produced by three Finnish companies Suomen Autoteollisuus (SAT), Wiima and Strömberg in 1979. [1] [2]
The Helsinki City Transport (HKL) ordered the prototype to gain experience for the future public transportation strategy for city of Helsinki. The trolleybus got its power from the overhead wires, but for wireless parts it had a diesel generator as a power source. The prototype contained advanced technology. [3]
The SWS prototype participated in COST 303 project in 1985 among other corresponding prototypes. As a part of the project, SWS was shipped to Belgium, where it served for half year in city of Ghent. [3]
Eventually, trolleybus transport was seen too expensive compared to the conventional diesel option, and therefore the City of Helsinki decided to discontinue the trolleybus service and replace it by diesel buses. The SWS trolleybus was kept for possible further investigation. [3]
In 1970 the Helsinki City Transport (HKL) suggested the city council to give up with trolleybus transportation. Instead, the council suggested the city board to extend the trolleybus network. The city transport committee calculated that the planned extensions would demand 70 vehicles. Based on the quotations HKL got, they decided to lease for trials Soviet made ZiU trolleybuses, for which they had got the cheapest offer. The vehicles arrived in February 1973 and they were taken to Wiima factory for converting them to meet the Finnish requirements. The test transportation began in May and continued until November, when the trolleybuses were returned to Soviet Union by rail. [3]
The city had received offers for new equipment from different producers, but as the city board did not budget any funds for the project, it remained frozen. The transport committee decided to end the operation by the old vehicles; the trolleybus service, that had begun in the 1940s, was ended in June 1974. In the same month the committee authorised HKL to order 17 trolleybuses and three domestically produced prototypes, if the city board grants the needed funds, which, however, did not happen. HKL sent again inquiries to 14 trolleybus producers in December 1976. In 1977 February the committee made the decision to restart the trolleybus traffic at latest beginning of 1979 and extend it during the following year. A contract of one domestically produced SWS-trolleybus prototype was signed off in December 1977. [3]
The project was carried out in co-operation between three companies: heavy vehicle and bus chassis producer Suomen Autoteollisuus, bus coach builder Wiima and Strömberg, which was specialised on electromechanical products. The prototype name SWS comes from the initials of the three companies. [1] The project target was to develop a trolleybus which would suit to the circumstances of Helsinki and to gain knowledge for the future public transport strategy. [3]
SAT supplied the Sisu BT-69-based chassis. It was equipped with axles and steering system but without engine and gearbox. [1] The driven axle is double reduction type because of the high revolution speed of the electrical motor. [3]
The propulsion system was supplied by Strömberg. [4] A main inverter transforms the direct current supplied from the wires to alternating current for the drive motor. The motor speed is adjusted by changing the alternating current frequency and voltage. The main inverter is also equipped with a possibility for transferring the braking energy back to the grid. The drive motor is asynchronous type and the maximum revolution speed is 4300 1/min. The alternative power source is located in the rear end of the vehicle and it consists of a 50-kW [3] Deutz diesel engine [1] and a 40-kW three-phase generator. The trolley poles are lowered and lifted automatically. The vehicle is also equipped with a 380-volt auxiliary inverter that supplies power for the air compressor, steering servo, ventilating fans and other systems. [3]
The coachwork and final assembly was done by Wiima. [1] The bodywork is mainly a standard citybus coach, apart from the structural requirements of the electrical devices, interior heating system and drive motor cooling system. [3]
The prototype required a special permit for service as the rear axle weight exceeded the allowed 10 tonnes. The reason for the heavy weight was the diesel generator unit. [3]
The prototype was handed over to HKL in April 1979 after which the tests started. In the following June it was demonstrated in an UITP congress at Finlandia Hall, where it got a lot of attention. The trolleybus was taken to service to line 14. Although HKL asked again inquiries for new trolleybuses in 1980, no decisions of new vehicles were made, and in 1983 it was decided to extend the prototype testing period until the spring of 1985, when the future of trolleybus traffic shall be decided. The prototype was used last time in February 1985 when it was decommissioned from service. [3]
In March 1985 the SWS prototype participated in COST 303 project together with nine other trolleybuses: Van Hool/ACEC AG 280T, Daimler-Benz/Bosch/Dornier/Varta 0 305 8, Daimler-Benz/AEG 0 305 GTD, MAN/Siemens 240 H, Renault/Traction CEM Oerlikon/Alstom Atlantique ER 100H/ER 100R, Renault/TREGIE/Traction CEM Oerlikon/SAFT ER180H, Renault/Traction CEM Oerlikon/Alstom Atlantique PER 1 80H, Mauri/Marelli Mauri and FIAT/IVEVO/Marel FIAT CNR-Iveco 471 BM. Every vehicle was tested by the same equipment and personnel from ATM, Italy, in order to ensure comparable results. The vehicle performance, energy consumption, noise level and other characteristics were measured. The AC motor technology used in SWS was unique at its time and Strömberg got substantially publicity for its solution. The prototype was shipped in the following autumn to Antwerp, Belgium. It was driven from the harbour by its own power unit to Ghent where it served the local city transport company MIVG. The end summit of the COST project was held in Brussels and SWS was shown on display in Gent together with the other participating vehicles. SWS returned to Finland after the event. [3]
The SWS characteristics were deeply analysed during and at the end of the testing period, when it had done 80 000 km. In the point of view of the driver, the performance is good and partly better than with a diesel bus. The only additional effort compared to a diesel bus comes from minding of the poles. The electrical braking system is efficient, and therefore the lifetime of the service brakes is longer. The drive motor at the rear axle is excessively noisy due to vibrations; the same issue concerns on the diesel engine. The heating system and main inverter cooling would need a further development. While the diesel generator ensured the power supply, the extra weight was seen as a drawback. The old and worn cables above the streets caused problems during service. [3]
Characteristics | SWS trolleybus | Diesel bus |
---|---|---|
Kerb weight | 12 000 kg | 10 500 kg |
Front axle weight | 6 300 kg | 5 600 kg |
Rear axle weight | 11 400 kg | 10 400 kg |
Total weight | 17 700 kg | 16 000 kg |
Output
| 200 kW 132 kW 110 kW | 150 kW |
Top speed | 60 km/h | 80 km/h |
Max. acceleration
| 2.2 m/s² 1.5 m/s² | 1.9 m/s² 1.2 m/s² |
Noise level, external | 75 dB (w/o diesel use) | 85 dB |
Noise level, internal
| (w/o diesel use) 68 dB 74 dB | 72 dB 82 dB |
Energy consumption
| 1.7 kWh/km 2.3 kWh/km | 0.5 L/km |
An analysis made in 1979 estimated that trolleybuses will become more common worldwide and cheaper by the end of the 1980s due to larger production series. Another assumption was that diesel oil price will increase faster compared to electricity price. [3]
The situation was reviewed again in 1985. The first forecast had not come true; the price ratio was the same as few years before. The second one proved correct, but the price development had not been sufficient to make trolleybus option competitive. The annual costs of trolleybus were still about 10% higher compared to a corresponding diesel bus, although the difference was narrower than before. It was calculated that if the same trend continues, the diesel and trolley buses will be at the same operating cost level by year 2000. [3]
Moreover, the trolleybus cable network in Helsinki was badly worn and its renewal would have demanded over 70 million marks more than replacing the old diesel buses by newer ones. It was also pointed out that the contemporary technology, originated from the 1940s and 1950s without significant differences, had not solved the problems related to cable crossings and curves. Other counter arguments for trolley bus traffic were bad condition of streets, as a trolleybus requires a smoother surface, and the existing tram cable network, which made it difficult to build new trolley cables. [3]
The outcome was that there was no economic basis to continue the trolleybus traffic in Helsinki. At the same time it was decided to keep the SWS prototype for possible future investigation. [3]
A trolleybus is an electric bus that draws power from dual overhead wires using spring-loaded trolley poles. Two wires, and two trolley poles, are required to complete the electrical circuit. This differs from a tram or streetcar, which normally uses the track as the return path, needing only one wire and one pole. They are also distinct from other kinds of electric buses, which usually rely on batteries. Power is most commonly supplied as 600-volt direct current, but there are exceptions.
ZiU-9, or ZIU-9 is a Soviet trolleybus. Other names for the ZiU-9 are ZiU-682 and HTI-682. The ZiU acronym stands for Zavod imeni Uritskogo, which is a factory named after Moisei Uritsky, the Russian revolutionary. Before 1996 this acronym was also a trademark of the vehicle manufacturer Trolza. The ZiU-9 was first built in 1966, although it was only put into mass production in 1972 and it was still assembled along with other more advanced trolleybus vehicles in the Trolza factory until 2015. The total number of produced ZiU-9s exceeds 42,000 vehicles making it the most produced trolleybus in the world. In addition, many copies of ZiU-9 were made in other factories of the former Soviet bloc.
Oy Sisu Auto Ab is a truck manufacturer based in Raseborg, Finland. Its name comes from the Finnish word sisu meaning guts, grit and determination.
Trolleybuses in Wellington were part of the Wellington public transport system from 1924 until 1932 and again from 1949 until 2017. It was the last trolleybus system operating commercially in Oceania and the last major system operating in a country where driving is on the left side of the road.
Electric Transit, Inc. (ETI) was a joint venture between the Škoda group in the Czech Republic and AAI Corporation in the United States which made trolleybuses for the Dayton and San Francisco trolleybus systems, constructing a total of 330 trolleybuses. ETI was formed in 1994, and ownership was divided as 65% by Škoda and 35% by AAI. The latter was a wholly owned subsidiary of United Industrial Corporation. Up to that time, Škoda had built more than 12,000 trolleybuses since 1935, but none for cities outside Europe and Asia. The ETI joint venture was dissolved in 2004, shortly after an unsuccessful bid to supply trolleybuses to Vancouver.
Nr II is a class of articulated six-axle, chopper-driven tram operated by Helsinki City Transport (HKL) on the Helsinki tram network. All trams of this type were built by the Finnish metal industry corporation Valmet between the years 1983 and 1987.
HM V is a class of two-bogie four-axle tram operated by Helsinki City Transport on the Helsinki tram network. All trams of this type were built by the Finnish tram manufacturer Karia in 1959.
Rocar was a van, light truck, bus and trolleybus manufacturer based in Bucharest, Romania. The firm also produced light offroad vehicles and later heavy road vehicles. During its existence, the company produced over 350,000 vehicles.
Mexicana de Autobuses, S.A., or MASA, was a major bus and coach manufacturer located in Mexico. Formed in 1959, it was owned by the Mexican government until being privatized in 1988. It was the country's second-largest bus manufacturer when it was acquired by Volvo, in 1998, and renamed Volvo Buses de México, S.A.
Trolleybuses served the London Passenger Transport Area from 1931 until 1962. For much of its existence, the London system was the largest in the world. It peaked at 68 routes, with a maximum fleet of 1,811 trolleybuses.
The Seattle trolleybus system forms part of the public transportation network in the city of Seattle, Washington, operated by King County Metro. Originally opened on April 28, 1940, the network consists of 15 routes, with 174 trolleybuses operating on 68 miles (109 km) of two-way parallel overhead lines. As of the first quarter of 2024, the system carries riders on an average of 42,600 trips per weekday, comprising about 18 percent of King County Metro's total daily ridership.
The Dayton trolleybus system forms part of the public transportation network serving Dayton, in the state of Ohio, United States. Opened on April 23, 1933, it presently comprises five lines, and is operated by the Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority, with a fleet of 45 trolleybuses. In 2023, the system had a ridership of 2,163,400, or about 6,000 per weekday as of the first quarter of 2024.
Veikko Muronen was a Finnish MSc (diplomi-insinööri) and heavy vehicle designer. He worked as a manager of the Engineering Department of Vanajan Autotehdas (VAT) and later Suomen Autoteollisuus (SAT). Muronen is best known as the inventor of Vanaja lifting tandem system and designer of the last Vanaja series, "Muros-Vanaja".
Vanajan Autotehdas Oy (VAT) was a producer of heavy vehicles based in Hämeenlinna, Finland. The company was founded as Yhteissisu Oy in 1943 by the Finnish government and a number of major Finnish companies with the aim of producing lorries and buses for the Finnish Defence Forces. World War II was over before the company could start series production; it was renamed Vanajan Autotehdas and the marque became Vanaja. Subsequently, the production consisted of outdated lorry models, partly built from military surplus materials. After overcoming initial difficulties, the company modernised its products, became profitable and grew until the mid-1950s. Many major components, including engines, were imported. Diesel engines became widely available in 1955, and in 1959 VAT introduced its most significant innovation, the full load lifting tandem axle mechanism, which improved off-road capability significantly; the system is now used in Sisu vehicles.
As of 2012 there were around 300 cities or metropolitan areas where trolleybuses were operated, and more than 500 additional trolleybus systems have existed in the past. For complete lists of trolleybus systems by location, with dates of opening and closure, see List of trolleybus systems and the related lists indexed there.
Sisu M-series is a 2–4-axle forward control lorry model series made by the Finnish heavy vehicle producer Suomen Autoteollisuus (SAT) in 1969–1984. The series consists of 4×2-driven M-161, 6×2-driven M-162, 6×4-driven M-163 and 8×2-driven M-168. Typical applications were logging trucks, tankers and long-distance transportation haulers which pulled conventional and semi-trailers. The permissible payloads varied from ca. 9 tonnes up over 18 tonnes.
Sisu KB-24 is a two-axle lorry and special vehicle chassis made by the Finnish heavy vehicle manufacturer Suomen Autoteollisuus (SAT) from 1955 to 1960. It is a six-tonne delivery lorry planned to operate on narrow streets in Finnish cities.
Sisu KB-124 was a two-axle lorry and special vehicle chassis made by the Finnish heavy vehicle manufacturer Suomen Autoteollisuus (SAT). It was a six-tonne delivery lorry which was developed to follow the KB-24. The KB-124 was produced from 1961 until 1968, when it was replaced by the similar KB-121 with increased permitted load. Production ceased in about 1972.
Sunbeam Commercial Vehicles was a commercial vehicle manufacturing offshoot of the Wolverhampton based Sunbeam Motor Car Company when it was a subsidiary of S T D Motors Limited. Sunbeam had always made ambulances on modified Sunbeam car chassis. S T D Motors chose to enter the large commercial vehicle market in the late 1920s, and once established they made petrol and diesel buses and electrically powered trolleybuses and milk floats. Commercial Vehicles became a separate department of Sunbeam in 1931.
The HKL Class M100 is the first and oldest class of metro trains in use on the Helsinki Metro. One train consists of two individually numbered cars. A total of 42 units were manufactured between 1977 and 1984.