Safe Sidewalk Vending Act

Last updated

The Safe Sidewalk Vending Act is a 2018 California law decriminalizing street vending and legalizing street vending under certain conditions.

Contents

The purpose of SB 946 is to decriminalize and legalize street vending throughout the state.

The proposal defines “sidewalk vendor” as a person who sells merchandise or food from a pushcart, stand, display, pedal-driven cart, wagon, showcase, rack, or other non-motorized conveyance on a sidewalk or pedestrian path. SB 946 states a vendor can be a “roaming sidewalk vendor”, which is someone who moves around to vend, or a “stationary vendor”, someone who just stays in one place to vend. SB 946 applies to charter cities in terms of local authority. [1]

The purpose of SB 946 is to let local law enforcement not fine or regulate street vendors where sidewalk traffic is light and is not infringing upon activity within the area. If local authorities wish to regulate sidewalk vending, they have to be consistent with SB 946. If a city does not have any sidewalk vending legislations and wishes to implement new ones, they also have to be consistent with SB 946. If local authorities have regulations that are consistent with SB 946, no further action is needed. If they have regulations that are not consistent with SB 946, adjustments to these laws will have to be adjusted.

Any sidewalk vending regulations that are adopted or enforced by local authority must follow specific standards

"SB 946 also imposes time, place, and manner restrictions on sidewalk street vending." [2]

A local authority is not required to enforce all or some of these restrictions. If any additional restrictions other than the ones above are to be enforced, it must be directly related to objective health, safety, or welfare concerns.

"SB 946 allows but does not require a permitting program for local sidewalk vendors." [2] These programs must accept specific ID documents in lieu of a social security number. The collected number is confidential.

SB 946 does not limit or affect any state food safety laws, including the California retail food code.

SB 946 does not allow any criminal charges, but may allow administrative fines. A violation of the local authority's vending programs is only punishable by the following fines: $100 for the first violation, $200 for the second violation, and $500 for any additional violation within one year of the first violation. If the local authority requires a vending program, the authorities can impose higher fines for vending without a permit: $250 for the first violation, $500 for the second violation, and $1000 for any additional violation within one year of the first violation. On the fourth and any subsequent violation, the local authority can rescind a permit.

SB 946 applies to any pending criminal charges or vindicates any prior convictions. [2]

Controversy

Vendor Cooperation

While the intent of SB 946 is to aid in the “important entrepreneurship and economic development opportunities” street vending may bring to low-income and immigrant communities, [2] the inability to prosecute vendors with criminal charges has led to issues surrounding vendor cooperation. Despite the passing of city ordinances that require vendors to receive permits and follow certain regulations, some vendors “have chosen to ignore these regulations and bypass the permitting program”. [3] A lack of vendor cooperation has led some cities to create stricter ordinances in hopes of gaining compliance through larger fines, relocations, or confiscation of “stalls and wares”. [4]

Health Permit

In many California cities, the permitting process required of vendors may also include receiving a food handler health permit, a document certifying the safe preparation of food by vendors. Outdated state retail food code however has caused issues for vendors seeking to comply with these regulations. [5] In an effort to solve this issue, Senate Bill 972 was passed by the California Senate in order to update the food code to simplify the requirements for street vendors. [6] Specifically, the bill introduces street vending into the food code and limits the equipment requirements originally established for food trucks. [7]

Opposition

The League of California Cities, which has a membership of 476 out of 482 of California's cities, opposed the adoption of SB 946. It argued that the bill went too far in restricting a local jurisdiction's ability to regulate sidewalk vending. It noted that jurisdictions regularly designate areas for specific use, such as for medical facilities and office buildings. The bill's limiting of penalties for violations of regulations on sidewalk vending to administrative fines was criticized as being an inadequate deterrent to unlawful activity. [8]

Criticism

A councilmember of Beverly Hill's City Council characterized SB 946 as a "stupid law". The city's Vice Mayor accused Sacramento of engaging in overreach over local affairs. [9]

On San Francisco's Mission Street, the neighborhood has become a prominent spot for people selling stolen goods. Officials blamed this activity on SB 946 because of how it limits penalties for unpermitted sidewalk vending to administrative fines. [10]

The Santa Ana City Council adopted a resolution blaming state laws for a rise in unpermitted sidewalk vendors selling unsafe food, blocking sidewalks, and undermining public health and safety. Officials in Santa Ana voiced concern that vendors from elsewhere came into the city to establish taco stands on sidewalks under large red umbrellas, taking over large sections of sidewalks, using heating equipment with open flames, and leaving behind grease residue. [11]

A councilmember in Santa Monica's City Council stated that SB 946 has made it more difficult to hold people accountable for violating regulations on sidewalk vending. Because SB 946 prevents criminal penalties for violations of laws around sidewalk vending, vendors choose to ignore those laws. Although vendors can be issued administrative fines for violations, they cannot be compelled to show identification documents when they are cited and can get relief based on their ability to pay. [12] An advocate for California's industry concluded, "What we’re seeing with S.B. 946 is there’s really just no incentive on either side for people to get permitted or for law enforcement to go after unpermitted people." [12]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jaywalking</span> Pedestrian crossing of a carriageway outside of a crosswalk

Jaywalking is the act of pedestrians walking in or crossing a roadway if that act contravenes traffic regulations. The term originated in the United States as a derivation of the phrase jay-drivers, people who drove horse-drawn carriages and automobiles on the wrong side of the road, before taking its current meaning. Jaywalking was coined as the automobile arrived in the street in the context of the conflict between pedestrian and automobiles, more specifically the nascent automobile industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bicycle law in California</span>

Bicycle law in California is the parts of the California Vehicle Code that set out the law for persons cycling in California, and a subset of bicycle law in the United States. In general, pretty much all the same rights and responsibilities that apply to car drivers apply to bicycle riders as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food truck</span> Large motorized car or trailer equipped to cook, prepare, serve, and/or sell food

A food truck is a large motorized vehicle or trailer equipped to store, transport, cook, prepare, serve, and/or sell food.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hawker (trade)</span> Street Vendor

A hawker is a vendor of merchandise that can be easily transported; the term is roughly synonymous with costermonger or peddler. In most places where the term is used, a hawker sells inexpensive goods, handicrafts, or food items. Whether stationary or mobile, hawkers often advertise by loud street cries or chants, and conduct banter with customers, to attract attention and enhance sales.

An open-container law is a law which regulates or prohibits drinking alcohol in public by limiting the existence of open alcoholic beverage containers in certain areas, as well as the active consumption of alcohol in those areas. "Public places" in this context refers to openly public places such as sidewalks, parks and vehicles. It does not include nominally private spaces which are open to the public, such as bars, restaurants and stadiums.

Many countries have enacted electric vehicle laws to regulate the use of electric bicycles, also termed e-bikes. Some jurisdictions have regulations governing safety requirements and standards of manufacture. The members of the European Union and other regions have wider-ranging legislation covering use and safety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divisoria</span> Commercial center in National Capital Region, Philippines

Divisoria is a commercial center in the districts of Tondo, Binondo, and San Nicolas in Manila, Philippines known for its shops that sell low-priced goods and its diverse manufacturing activities. Tutuban Center is situated within the commercial hub along with a night market located in the Centers' vicinity. The area is riddled with different bazaars, bargain malls, and a few points of interest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food booth</span> Booth or stand that sells food

A food booth – also called a food kiosk, food stand, or temporary food service facility – is generally a temporary structure used to prepare and sell food to the general public, usually where large groups of people are situated outdoors in a park, at a parade, near a stadium, or otherwise. Sometimes the term also refers to the business operations and vendors that operate from such booths.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in California</span> Californias gun law

Gun laws in California regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of California in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smoking in Japan</span> Aspect of public health in Japan

Smoking in Japan is practiced by around 20,000,000 people, and the nation is one of the world's largest tobacco markets, though tobacco use has been declining in recent years.

Disabled veteran street vendors in New York City are legally exempt from municipal regulations on street vendors, under a 19th-century New York state law. As of 2004, there were 374 permitted disabled veteran street vendors, 60 of whom were permitted to operate inside Midtown Manhattan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannabis in California</span> Legality, use and culture of medical and recreational cannabis in California

Cannabis in California has been legal for medical use since 1996, and for recreational use since late 2016. The state of California has been at the forefront of efforts to liberalize cannabis laws in the United States, beginning in 1972 with the nation's first ballot initiative attempting to legalize cannabis. Although it was unsuccessful, California would later become the first state to legalize medical cannabis through the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, which passed with 56% voter approval. In November 2016, California voters approved the Adult Use of Marijuana Act with 57% of the vote, which legalized the recreational use of cannabis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scott Wiener</span> American politician

Scott Wiener is an American politician and a member of the California State Senate. A Democrat, he represents the 11th Senatorial District, encompassing San Francisco and parts of San Mateo County.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Montana</span>

Gun laws in Montana regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of Montana in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Street Vendors Act, 2014</span>

Street Vendors Act, 2014 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted to regulate street vendors in public areas and protect their rights. It was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 6 September 2012 by then Union Minister of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, Kumari Selja. The Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on 6 September 2013 and by the Rajya Sabha on 19 February 2014. The bill received the assent of the President of India on 4 March 2014. The Act came into force from 1 May 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Street Artists Program of San Francisco</span> Municipal arts program

The Street Artists Program of San Francisco is a municipal arts program in which independent street artists and craftspeople sell their art and craft items in designated public spaces in the city of San Francisco, California. The artists are licensed by the San Francisco Arts Commission and are only allowed to sell work that has been "predominantly created or significantly altered in form" by the street artist. The Arts Commission currently licenses approximately 400 street artists, whose licensing fees cover all program costs. The program generates an estimated $4 million annually for the city's economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Street vendors in Mexico City</span>

The presence of street vendors in Mexico City dates back to pre-Hispanic era and over the centuries the government has struggled to control it, with most recently a clearing of downtown streets of vendors in 2007, but despite this there is a persistent presence of many thousands illegally. Even after oscillating between the realms of legality and illegality, street vending in Mexico and even in other parts of the world, is not the exception but rather has been a norm when it comes to commercial activities. In 2003, it was estimated that there were 199,328 street vendors in Mexico City.

The legality of ridesharing companies by jurisdiction varies; in some areas they are considered to be illegal taxi operations, while in other areas, they are subject to regulations that can include requirements for driver background checks, fares, caps on the number of drivers in an area, insurance, licensing, and minimum wage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in the United States by state</span>

Homelessness in the United States has occurred to varying degrees across the country. The total number of homeless people in the United States fluctuates and constantly changes hence a comprehensive figure encompassing the entire nation is not issued since counts from independent shelter providers and statistics managed by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development vary greatly. Federal HUD counts hover annually at around 500,000 people. Point-in-time counts are also vague measures of homeless populations and are not a precise and definitive indicator for the total number of cases, which may differ in both directions up or down. The most recent figure for the year 2019 that was given was at 567,715 individuals across the country that have experienced homelessness at a point in time during this period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Street vending in Los Angeles</span>

Street vendors have existed in Los Angeles since California became a state. They have mostly been poorer Latin American and Chinese immigrants.

References

  1. Holmes, Mona (2019-11-14). "Street vendors face uncertainty while LA officials work out new rules". Eater LA. Retrieved 2020-09-15.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Bill Text - SB 946 Sidewalk Vendors". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
  3. "A well intentioned state law kick-started chaos on the Pier – Santa Monica Daily Press". www.smdp.com. 22 January 2022. Retrieved 2022-05-28.
  4. "San Diego's Passes $5.1M Street-Vendor Plan, Offset By $38,000 Raised By Issuing Permits". NBC 7 San Diego. Retrieved 2022-05-28.
  5. "L.A.'s sidewalk vendors have been hitting an obstacle: Legalizing their carts". Los Angeles Times. 2021-08-11. Retrieved 2022-05-28.
  6. "California Lawmakers Pass Bill to Streamline Permitting for Street Vendors". SM Mirror. 2022-04-28. Retrieved 2022-05-28.
  7. Munoz, Anabel (2022-05-15). "California bill aims to help street food vendors by changing retail code". ABC7 Los Angeles. Retrieved 2022-05-28.
  8. "Bill Analysis - SB-946 Sidewalk vendors". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2024-01-02.
  9. Harold, Luke (2019-01-03). "Street vendors could be coming to Beverly Hills". Beverly Press & Park Labrea News. Retrieved 2024-01-02.
  10. Mishanec, Nora (2023-11-27). "S.F.'s Mission Street vending ban takes effect. Will it stop 'the living nightmare'?". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2024-01-02.
  11. "After Santa Ana's crackdown on taco stands, council asks California to amend its street vendor laws". Orange County Register. 2023-03-09. Retrieved 2024-01-02.
  12. 1 2 Harter, Clara (2022-01-22). "A well intentioned state law kick-started chaos on the Pier". Santa Monica Daily Press. Retrieved 2024-01-02.

Further reading