Road Repair and Accountability Act

Last updated

Road Repair and Accountability Act
Seal of California.svg
California State Legislature
Full nameRoad Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Official Name
  • An act to amend Section 14526.5 of, to add Sections 14033, 14110, 14526.7, 14556.41, and 16321 to, to add Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 14460) to Part 5 of Division 3 of Title 2 of, to repeal Sections 63048.66, 63048.67, 63048.7, 63048.75, 63048.8, and 63048.85 of, and to repeal and add Section 63048.65 of, the Government Code, to add Section 43021 to the Health and Safety Code, to amend Section 99312.1 of, and to add Sections 99312.3, 99312.4, and 99314.9 to, the Public Utilities Code, to amend Sections 6051.8, 6201.8, 7360, 8352.4, 8352.5, 8352.6, and 60050 of, to add Sections 7361.2, 7653.2, 60050.2, and 60201.4 to, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 11050) to Part 5 of Division 2 of, the Revenue and Taxation Code, to amend Sections 2104, 2105, 2106, and 2107 of, to add Sections 2103.1 and 2192.4 to, to add Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 800) to Chapter 4 of Division 1 of, and to add Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 2030) and Chapter 8.5 (commencing with Section 2390) to Division 3 of, the Streets and Highways Code, and to amend Section 4156 of, and to add Sections 4000.15 and 9250.6 to, the Vehicle Code, relating to transportation, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.
IntroducedDecember 6, 2016
Assembly voted54-26
Senate voted27-11
Signed into lawYes
Governor Jerry Brown
CodeGovernment,
Health and Safety,
Public Utilities,
Revenue and Taxation,
Streets and Highways,
and Vehicle
Section
Government Code
Health and Safety Code
Public Utilities Code
Revenue and Taxation Code
Streets and Highways Code
Vehicle Code
Website https://rebuildingca.ca.gov
Status: Amended

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Senate Bill 1), also known as the " Gas Tax ", is a California legislative bill that was passed on April 6, 2017 with the aim of repairing roads, improving traffic safety, and expanding public transit systems across the state. The approval of the fuel tax was for a projected $52.4 billion, or $5.24 billion per year, to be raised over the next 10 years to fund the state's infrastructure. The bill passed primarily along party lines, with most Democrats supporting the bill while most Republicans were against it. The bill passed with a vote of 27–11 in the Senate and 54–26 in the Assembly. According to California Department of Transportation, for maintenance projects on state highways, while providing funding to enhance trade corridors, transit, and active transportation facilities, in addition to repairing local streets and roads throughout California. [1] [2]

Contents

2020 model year and newer zero-emission vehicles will each be assessed an additional $100 "road improvement fee" with the passage of SB 1 as fuel tax would not be applicable to them. In addition to the funding provisions, the bill requires diesel trucks and buses over 14,000 pounds which were made before 2010 to be banned from operating in California by January 1, 2023. [3]

Voting

The California State Senate had passed the bill 27–11 and 54–26 in the State Assembly, the minimum amount required to pass the legislation in both houses. Senator Steve Glazer (D–Orinda) stated that he would not back the bill "for good reasons" [4] citing that he did not have enough support at home to vote in favor of the bill. Only one Democratic Assemblyman, Rudy Salas (D–Bakersfield) would not back the bill. [5]

Coverage

Breakdown of funding allocations between state and local. CA SB1 Funding Allocations on Annual Basis.jpg
Breakdown of funding allocations between state and local.

The $52 billion does not go to one agency, but is divided up to go to different projects. The revenues estimated to be available for allocation under the act to local agencies are estimated to be the following amounts, over the 10 years after the bill was passed:

The revenues estimated to be available for allocation under the act to the state are estimated to be the following amounts, over the 10 years after the bill was passed:

The revenues are divided up between the state and local governments, with the vast majority ($30 billion) going towards road maintenance.

Support

The American Road and Transportation Builders Association argued that the Road Repair and Accountability Act would provide California with $18.3 billion of economic benefits per year, including $3.8 billion per year in user benefits as a result of decreased congestion and improved infrastructure, and $11.2 billion in increased economic activity that would be enabled by better transportation infrastructure. Through the improved roads and transportation options, they said SB1 would save the average California household $300 per year. [7]

Criticisms

Some California residents complained about how the tax affects them, [8] and Republicans said that California has one of the highest transportation tax rates in the country. [9] A poll published in June 2017 showed that 58% of California residents oppose the increase in fuel taxes, 39% of all respondents stating they "strongly oppose" the increase. [10]

California SB1 Car Registration Fee annual increase. Gas Registration Tax.jpg
California SB1 Car Registration Fee annual increase.

SB1 also imposed a vehicle registration fee increase. The annual fee increase is based on the value of the vehicle, ranging from $25 to $175. [11]

There are also voter concerns of transportation funds being protected to be used just for transportation, as by previous mandates of Proposition 42 (2003) [12] and Proposition 1a (2006). [13] Even with past protections, $1.8 billion of fuel tax funds in 2010 [14] were moved to the General Fund, known as the gas tax swap. [15] The June 2018 ballot included Proposition 69, an amendment that ensures revenues are used for transportation-related purposes. [16]

California spends 2.5 times as much per mile of state-controlled highway as the national average. [17] As such, one criticism centers not on the amount of revenue, but on the way the revenue is spent.

Proposition 69

The SB1 taxes were exempt from expenditures appropriations limits. Proposition 69 was a state constitution amendment that ensures that revenues from SB1 can only be used for transportation-related purposes. Voters approved this proposition in June 2018, locking the tax revenue to transportation only. The SB1 car registration fee increase and all older existing fuel tax revenues before SB1 are still appropriated to the General Fund. [18]

Proposition 6

A ballot initiative “Repeal the Gas Car Tax” signature drive was led by Carl DeMaio. Volunteers gathered more than 940,000 signatures statewide, which exceeded the minimum requirement of 584,000 signatures for the measure to be on the November 2018 voter ballot. [19] The Proposition 6 ballot initiative, if it had been passed by voters, would have repealed the fuel tax increase and the vehicle registration fee increase, and would have mandated any future fuel tax increase be approved only by popular vote. [20] The measure failed with about 55% of voters opposed. [21]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1978 California Proposition 13</span> Ballot initiative which capped property tax at 1% and yearly increases at 2%

Proposition 13 is an amendment of the Constitution of California enacted during 1978, by means of the initiative process. The initiative was approved by California voters on June 6, 1978. It was upheld as constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992). Proposition 13 is embodied in Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State of California.

The Taxpayer Bill of Rights is a concept advocated by conservative and free market libertarian groups, primarily in the United States, as a way of limiting the growth of government. It is not a charter of rights but a provision requiring that increases in overall tax revenue be tied to inflation and population increases unless larger increases are approved by referendum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 California Proposition 65</span> 2004 California ballot proposition

Proposition 65 was a California ballot proposition on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 3,901,748 (37.6%) votes in favor and 6,471,506 (62.4%) against. It was a state constitutional amendment that would have required voter approval for any state legislation reducing certain local government revenues from January 2003 levels. It was officially known as the Local Taxpayers and Public Safety Protection Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 California Proposition 87</span> 2006 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 87 was a proposition on the ballot for California voters for the November 7, 2006 general election, officially titled Alternative Energy. Research, Production, Incentives. Tax on California Oil Producers. It was rejected by the voters, 54.7% opposed to 45.3% in favor. This was highest-funded campaign on any state ballot and surpassing every campaign in the country in spending except the presidential contest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1996 California Proposition 218</span> Adopted initiative constitutional amendment

Proposition 218 is an adopted initiative constitutional amendment which revolutionized local and regional government finance and taxation in California. Named the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," it was sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as a constitutional follow-up to the landmark property tax reduction initiative constitutional amendment, Proposition 13, approved in 1978. Proposition 218 was approved and adopted by California voters during the November 5, 1996, statewide general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2007 Texas constitutional amendment election</span>

The 2007 Texas Constitutional Amendment Election took place 6 November 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 91</span> Failed ballot proposition on fuel tax use

California Proposition 91 was a failed proposal to amend the California Constitution to prohibit motor vehicle fuel sales taxes that are earmarked for transportation purposes from being retained in the state's general fund. The proposition appeared on the ballot of the February primary election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 10</span> Ballot measure in California

California Proposition 10, also known as the California Alternative Fuels Initiative, was an unsuccessful initiated state statute that appeared on the November 2008 ballot in California. Proposition 10 was funded by Clean Energy Fuels Corp., a corporation owned by T. Boone Pickens. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is the nation's leading operator of natural gas vehicle fueling stations.

A vehicle miles traveled tax, also frequently referred to as a VMT tax, VMT fee, mileage-based fee, or road user charge, is a policy of charging motorists based on how many miles they have traveled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California elections</span>

The California state elections, November 2010 were held on November 2, 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taxation in California</span> Overview of taxation in the U.S. state of California

Taxes in California are among the highest in the United States and are imposed by the state and by local governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Travis Allen</span> American politician

Travis Ethan Allen is an American politician who served as a Republican member of the California State Assembly. Allen was first elected in November 2012 to represent California's 72nd State Assembly district, which includes the cities of Fountain Valley, Los Alamitos, Seal Beach, and Westminster, most of Garden Grove, portions of Huntington Beach and of Santa Ana, and the unincorporated communities of Midway and Rossmoor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2015 Michigan Proposal 1</span> Michigan ballot measure

2015 Michigan Proposal 1, also known as the Michigan Sales Tax Increase for Transportation Amendment, was a referendum held on May 5, 2015, concerning a legislatively-referred ballot measure. The measure's approval would have caused one constitutional amendment and 10 statutes to go into effect. It is estimated that Proposal 1 would raise state revenues from sales and use taxes by $1.427 billion, fuel taxes by $463 million, truck registration fees by $50 million, and vehicle registration fees by $10.1 million in the first year. If approved, the proposal was estimated by the Associated Press to result in an average tax increase of $545 per household in 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1996 California Proposition 218 (Local Initiative Power)</span> Adopted initiative constitutional amendment

Proposition 218 is an adopted initiative constitutional amendment in the state of California that appeared on the November 5, 1996, statewide election ballot. Proposition 218 revolutionized local and regional government finance in California. Called the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” Proposition 218 was sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as a constitutional follow-up to the landmark Proposition 13 property tax revolt initiative constitutional amendment approved by California voters on June 6, 1978. Proposition 218 was drafted by constitutional attorneys Jonathan Coupal and Jack Cohen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California elections</span>

The California state elections in 2020 were held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Unlike previous election cycles, the primary elections were held on Super Tuesday, March 3, 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California elections</span>

California state elections in 2018 were held on Tuesday, November 6, 2018, with the primary elections being held on June 5, 2018. Voters elected one member to the United States Senate, 53 members to the United States House of Representatives, all eight state constitutional offices, all four members to the Board of Equalization, 20 members to the California State Senate, and all 80 members to the California State Assembly, among other elected offices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California Proposition 6</span> Failed amendment to the Constitution of California

California Proposition 6 was a measure that was submitted to California voters as part of the November 2018 election. The ballot measure proposed a repeal of the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which is also known as Senate Bill 1. The measure failed with about 57% of the voters against and 43% in favor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California Proposition 69</span> California ballot measure

California Proposition 69 was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that appeared on ballots in California in the June primary election in 2018. This measure put the revenue from the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which increased fuel taxes, in a "lockbox" so that it can only be used for transportation-related purposes. It also exempts said gas tax revenue from the previously existing appropriations mandate and expenditures limit. This state constitution amendment ensures that revenues from SB1 Gas Taxes established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 can only be used for transportation-related purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 California Proposition 30</span> 2022 California ballot proposition

Proposition 30 is a California ballot proposition that appeared in the general election on November 8, 2022. The measure was defeated. The initiative would have raised taxes on the wealthy to fund wildfire management and electric vehicle incentives and infrastructure.

References

  1. ↑ LAO Transportation Brief - http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2017/3688/2017-transportation-package-060817.pdf
  2. ↑ California Department of Transportation. "Important Events in Caltrans History". California Department of Transportation. Retrieved November 3, 2017.
  3. ↑ "California's ban on around 70,000 vehicles takes effect this week". MSN. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
  4. ↑ "California Legislature passes 12-cent gas tax hike". The Mercury News. April 6, 2017. Retrieved November 3, 2017.
  5. ↑ Mason, Patrick; McGreevy, Melanie. "California Legislature votes to raise gas taxes, vehicle fees by $5.2 billion a year for road repairs and transit". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved November 3, 2017.
  6. ↑ "Senate Bill No. 1; CHAPTER 5; An act to amend Section 14526.5 of, to add Sections 14033, 14110, 14526.7, 14556.41, and 16321 to, to add Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 14460) to Part 5 of Division 3 of Title 2 of, to repeal Sections 63048.66, 63048.67, 63048.7, 63048.75, 63048.8, and 63048.85 of, and to repeal and add Section 63048.65 of, the Government Code, to add Section 43021 to the Health and Safety Code, to amend Section 99312.1 of, and to add Sections 99312.3, 99312.4, and 99314.9 to, the Public Utilities Code, to amend Sections 6051.8, 6201.8, 7360, 8352.4, 8352.5, 8352.6, and 60050 of, to add Sections 7361.2, 7653.2, 60050.2, and 60201.4 to, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 11050) to Part 5 of Division 2 of, the Revenue and Taxation Code, to amend Sections 2104, 2105, 2106, and 2107 of, to add Sections 2103.1 and 2192.4 to, to add Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 800) to Chapter 4 of Division 1 of, and to add Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 2030) and Chapter 8.5 (commencing with Section 2390) to Division 3 of, the Streets and Highways Code, and to amend Section 4156 of, and to add Sections 4000.15 and 9250.6 to, the Vehicle Code, relating to transportation, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately". California Office of Legislative Counsel . Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  7. ↑ "The Economic Impacts of Senate Bill 1 on California" (PDF). American Road and Transportation Builders Association. Retrieved July 6, 2018.
  8. ↑ Glover, Mark (October 27, 2017). "You might want to fill up that gas tank before Nov. 1 tax hike". The Sacramento Bee. Retrieved November 3, 2017.
  9. ↑ "California lawmakers approve fuel tax hike for $52 billion road plan". Reuters. April 7, 2017. Retrieved November 3, 2017.
  10. ↑ Mark, DiCamillo (June 9, 2017). "Release #2017-09: A majority of voters oppose the state's new gas tax law, 39% strongly". eScholarship.
  11. ↑ Potter, Daniel (December 19, 2017). "California Vehicle Registration Fees Increasing In 2018". Capital Public Radio. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  12. ↑ "Proposition 42: Transportation Congestion Improvement Act - California State Government". Smart Voter. League of Women Voters of California. April 19, 2002. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  13. ↑ "California Proposition 1A, Transportation Funding Protection (2006) - Ballotpedia". Ballotpedia. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  14. ↑ U-T San Diego Editorial Board (February 22, 2015). "Undo gas tax swap — then fix roads". San Diego Union Tribune. Retrieved July 30, 2018.
  15. ↑ "Gas Tax Swap". California Transit Association. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  16. ↑ Castaneda, Rebeca; Feigenbaum, Baruch (June 1, 2018). "California's Prop. 69 Puts Focus on How State Spends Transportation Funds". Reason Foundation. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  17. ↑ "22nd Annual Highway Report" (PDF). 2017.
  18. ↑ "California Proposition 69, Transportation Taxes and Fees Lockbox and Appropriations Limit Exemption Amendment (June 2018)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  19. ↑ McAllister, Toni (April 29, 2018). "Carl DeMaio-Backed Gas Tax Repeal Said to Have Enough Signatures for Ballot - Times of San Diego". Times of San Diego. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  20. ↑ McGreevy, Patrick (June 25, 2018). "California ballot will include gas tax repeal in November". LA Times. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  21. ↑ Swan, Rachel (November 7, 2018). "Prop. 6: Californians reject gas tax repeal measure". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.