San Francisco Estuary Institute

Last updated
San Francisco Estuary Institute
Founded1992
Type 501(c)(3)
FocusEnvironmental research and monitoring
Location
Area served
San Francisco Bay Area
Key people
Ann Hayden, Board Chair
Warner Chabot, Executive Director
Budget
$13.9M (2023)
Revenue
Government and private sector contracts, grants, donations
Website sfei.org

The San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) is a nonprofit research institute focusing on the estuaries and ecosystems of San Francisco Bay and Northern California. SFEI was created in 1992 in order to coordinate integrated research and monitoring of the Bay. [1] SFEI administers the Aquatic Science Center, a joint powers authority (JPA), which is an agency formed when multiple government agencies have a common mission that can be better achieved by pooling resources and knowledge. [2] [3] SFEI's precursor was the Aquatic Habitat Institute, created in 1986. [4]

Contents

Research

Water quality monitoring

SFEI has managed the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) since its beginning in 1993. [5] Scientists monitor pollutants in water, sediment, and in Bay wildlife, including bivalves, fish, bird eggs, and harbor seals. Samples are analyzed for mercury, PCBs, pesticides, metals, and a variety of contaminants of emerging concern.

Thousands of man-made chemicals are found in Bay water, sediment, and organisms. For many of these, there is little or no data on their impacts on the environment or human health, and they are not regulated by state or federal law. These are often referred to as "contaminants of emerging concern" or CECs. SFEI has studied these chemicals in the Bay since 2001. [6] Scientists have identified the following most likely to have a negative impact on Bay wildlife: PFOS, the pesticide fipronil, nonylphenols and nonylphenol ethoxylates. [7]

Information developed by the RMP is used by state regulators to set Total Maximum Daily Loads. RMP data has also been used in the development of fish consumption advisories by California's Department of Public Health. Levels of PCBs and mercury in certain species of sportfish in San Francisco Bay exceed safe levels for human consumption. [8] The RMP collected data on copper in stormwater, which is toxic to aquatic organisms at elevated concentrations. These data contributed to the passage of California Senate Bill 346, also known as the California Motor Vehicle Brake Friction Material Law. This law supports the development of alternative, less toxic materials for use in brake pads. [5]

Ecology

SFEI scientists have made wide use of the techniques of historical ecology, which incorporates information from historical maps and other records to learn how and ecosystems have changed over time. This information is used to help guide restoration and management plans for wetlands and other landscapes. [9]

Information Technology

SFEI staff have collaborated with NASA scientists to develop an early-warning system for harmful algal blooms, based on satellite remote sensing data and artificial intelligence. [10]

History

In 1987, the San Francisco Estuary Project (SFEP, a state and federal cooperative program) began creating a Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) for the San Francisco Estuary, involving over 100 stakeholders. The CCMP led to the establishment of the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) and the Regional Monitoring Program (RMP).

In 1992, the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board mandated the implementation of a regional pollutant monitoring program in the Bay. Under the federal Clean Water Act and the state Porter Cologne Water Quality Act, polluters must have a discharge permit, and must monitor discharges (compliance monitoring) and in the water body near their discharge (receiving water impacts monitoring). This results in a patchwork of data that is not well-suited for science or management. [1] By contrast, coordinated monitoring programs can gather information relevant to managers and with clear scientific objectives. Because cooperative programs can be more efficient and useful, several such programs have been created in the United States, for example for the Chesapeake Bay, [11] in Puget Sound, [12] and the Southern California Bight. [13]

In 1993, the Aquatic Habitat Institute was reorganized as SFEI and the RMP officially began, using previous pilot studies to guide its monitoring efforts. [14] The RMP annual budget has grown from $1.2 million in 1993 to $5.4 million in 2024. [15]

In the early 1990s, California regulatory agencies established numeric criteria for several pollutants, but little was known about whether waterways exceeded these criteria. Early work by the RMP focused on sampling water in the Bay to determine its status, and whether pollutant concentrations met or exceeded standards. In subsequent years, the RMP has expanded its objectives to include estimating inputs ("loads") of pollutants to the Bay, understanding how pollutants enter waterways ("pathways"), and effects of pollutants on wildlife. These goals assist regulators in developing Total Maximum Daily Loads and issuing discharge permits required by the US Clean Water Act and California's Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. [4]

SFEI is located in Richmond, California. SFEI's original location (in 1993) was in Oakland, California, with subsequent offices at the Richmond Field Station before moving to the present location in 2007.

Member Agencies

The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) is funded by permitted dischargers including oil refineries, industrial facilities, dredgers, wastewater treatment facilities, and municipal stormwater management programs. For a full list, see Appendix A in the RMP charter. [16] Members participate in the RMP in exchange for some regulatory relief, or exemption from conducting some monitoring that would normally be required under the Clean Water Act and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Participants elect representatives to serve on various committees, through which they oversee the program's finances, guide its management, and provide input and peer review of the science. In addition, the RMP has over a dozen science advisors, nationally recognized experts in various fields of environmental science.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">San Francisco Bay</span> Shallow estuary on the coast of California, United States

San Francisco Bay is a large tidal estuary in the U.S. state of California, and gives its name to the San Francisco Bay Area. It is dominated by the cities of San Francisco, San Jose, and Oakland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stormwater</span> Water that originates during precipitation events and snow/ice melt

Stormwater, also written storm water, is water that originates from precipitation (storm), including heavy rain and meltwater from hail and snow. Stormwater can soak into the soil (infiltrate) and become groundwater, be stored on depressed land surface in ponds and puddles, evaporate back into the atmosphere, or contribute to surface runoff. Most runoff is conveyed directly as surface water to nearby streams, rivers or other large water bodies without treatment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution</span> Contamination of water bodies

Water pollution is the contamination of water bodies, with a negative impact on their uses. It is usually a result of human activities. Water bodies include lakes, rivers, oceans, aquifers, reservoirs and groundwater. Water pollution results when contaminants mix with these water bodies. Contaminants can come from one of four main sources. These are sewage discharges, industrial activities, agricultural activities, and urban runoff including stormwater. Water pollution may affect either surface water or groundwater. This form of pollution can lead to many problems. One is the degradation of aquatic ecosystems. Another is spreading water-borne diseases when people use polluted water for drinking or irrigation. Water pollution also reduces the ecosystem services such as drinking water provided by the water resource.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rain garden</span> Runoff reducing landscaping method

Rain gardens, also called bioretention facilities, are one of a variety of practices designed to increase rain runoff reabsorption by the soil. They can also be used to treat polluted stormwater runoff. Rain gardens are designed landscape sites that reduce the flow rate, total quantity, and pollutant load of runoff from impervious urban areas like roofs, driveways, walkways, parking lots, and compacted lawn areas. Rain gardens rely on plants and natural or engineered soil medium to retain stormwater and increase the lag time of infiltration, while remediating and filtering pollutants carried by urban runoff. Rain gardens provide a method to reuse and optimize any rain that falls, reducing or avoiding the need for additional irrigation. A benefit of planting rain gardens is the consequential decrease in ambient air and water temperature, a mitigation that is especially effective in urban areas containing an abundance of impervious surfaces that absorb heat in a phenomenon known as the heat-island effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonpoint source pollution</span> Pollution resulting from multiple sources

Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution refers to diffuse contamination of water or air that does not originate from a single discrete source. This type of pollution is often the cumulative effect of small amounts of contaminants gathered from a large area. It is in contrast to point source pollution which results from a single source. Nonpoint source pollution generally results from land runoff, precipitation, atmospheric deposition, drainage, seepage, or hydrological modification where tracing pollution back to a single source is difficult. Nonpoint source water pollution affects a water body from sources such as polluted runoff from agricultural areas draining into a river, or wind-borne debris blowing out to sea. Nonpoint source air pollution affects air quality, from sources such as smokestacks or car tailpipes. Although these pollutants have originated from a point source, the long-range transport ability and multiple sources of the pollutant make it a nonpoint source of pollution; if the discharges were to occur to a body of water or into the atmosphere at a single location, the pollution would be single-point.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface runoff</span> Flow of excess rainwater not infiltrating in the ground over its surface

Surface runoff is the unconfined flow of water over the ground surface, in contrast to channel runoff. It occurs when excess rainwater, stormwater, meltwater, or other sources, can no longer sufficiently rapidly infiltrate in the soil. This can occur when the soil is saturated by water to its full capacity, and the rain arrives more quickly than the soil can absorb it. Surface runoff often occurs because impervious areas do not allow water to soak into the ground. Furthermore, runoff can occur either through natural or human-made processes.

A total maximum daily load (TMDL) is a regulatory term in the U.S. Clean Water Act, describing a plan for restoring impaired waters that identifies the maximum amount of a pollutant that a body of water can receive while still meeting water quality standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wildcat Creek (California)</span> River in California, United States

Wildcat Creek is a 13.4-mile-long (21.6 km) creek which flows through Wildcat Canyon situated between the Berkeley Hills and the San Pablo Ridge, emptying into San Pablo Bay in Contra Costa County, northern California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Castro Cove</span>

Castro Cove is a "portion of the San Pablo Bay" in Richmond, California located between Point San Pablo and the confluence of Wildcat Creek into Castro Creek.

Upper Penitencia Creek is actually one of two creeks by the name Penitencia Creek in the northeastern Santa Clara Valley of Santa Clara County, California. They are both tributaries of Coyote Creek. The upper creek was diverted southwestward, connecting it directly to Coyote Creek ca. 1850 by a farmer to irrigate his fields, permanently splitting Upper Penitencia Creek from Lower Penitencia Creek. Upper Penitencia Creek drains the western slopes of Mount Hamilton of the Diablo Range, and passes through Alum Rock Park, before ending at its confluence with Coyote Creek at Berryessa Road. In December 2018, the San Francisco Estuary Institute published a report commissioned by the Santa Clara Valley Water District to establish a vision for Upper Penitencia Creek's lower four miles focusing on ways "to expand flow conveyance and flood water storage from the Coyote Creek confluence upstream to the Dorel Drive bridge in a manner that works with the existing landscape features and supports habitats for native species".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urban runoff</span> Surface runoff of water caused by urbanization

Urban runoff is surface runoff of rainwater, landscape irrigation, and car washing created by urbanization. Impervious surfaces are constructed during land development. During rain, storms, and other precipitation events, these surfaces, along with rooftops, carry polluted stormwater to storm drains, instead of allowing the water to percolate through soil. This causes lowering of the water table and flooding since the amount of water that remains on the surface is greater. Most municipal storm sewer systems discharge untreated stormwater to streams, rivers, and bays. This excess water can also make its way into people's properties through basement backups and seepage through building wall and floors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution in New Zealand</span> Overview of the water pollution in New Zealand

Water pollution in New Zealand is an increasing concern for those who use and care for waterways and for New Zealand regulatory bodies. An increase in population is linked to an increase in water pollution, due to a range of causes such as rural land use, industrial use and urban development. Fresh water quality is under pressure from agriculture, hydropower, urban development, pest invasions and climate change. While pollution from point sources has been reduced, diffuse pollution such as nutrients, pathogens and sediments development and from stormwater in towns is not under control. There are more than 800 water quality monitoring sites around New Zealand that are regularly sampled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California State Water Resources Control Board</span> Branch of the California Environmental Protection Agency

The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is one of six branches of the California Environmental Protection Agency.

The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) is a research institute focusing on the coastal ecosystems of Southern California from watersheds to the ocean. SCCWRP was created as a joint powers authority (JPA), which is an agency formed when multiple government agencies have a common mission that can be better achieved by pooling resources and knowledge. The purpose of SCCWRP is to gather the necessary scientific information to allow member agencies to effectively and cost-efficiently steward the Southern California coastal environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Bays and Estuaries Policy</span> Guidelines to prevent water quality degradation

The Water Quality Control Policy for the Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California is published by the California State Water Resources Control Board as guidelines to prevent water quality degradation. The policy is revised as needed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tijuana River Estuary</span>

The Tijuana River Estuary is an intertidal coastal wetland at the mouth of the Tijuana River in San Diego County, California, United States, bordering Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico. It is the location of Tijuana River National Estuarine Research Reserve, Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge, Border Field State Park, and Tijuana River Valley Regional Park. The estuary is a shallow water habitat. Often termed an intermittent estuary since its volume is subject to the discharge controlled by the seasons of the year, the volume of the estuary fluctuates and at times there is dry land, or flooded areas. It was designated a National Natural Landmark in 1973.

Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 568 U.S. 78 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Natural Resources Defense Council and Santa Monica Baykeeper challenged the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District) for violating the terms of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit as shown in water quality measurements from monitoring stations within the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers. The Supreme Court, by a unanimous 9-0 vote, reversed and remanded the Ninth Circuit's ruling on the grounds that the flow of water from an improved portion of a navigable waterway into an unimproved portion of the same waterway does not qualify as a "discharge of a pollutant" under the Clean Water Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">San Francisco Estuary Partnership</span> American government program

The San Francisco Estuary Partnership (Partnership) is one of the 28 National Estuary Programs created in the 1987 Amendments to the Clean Water Act. The Partnership is a non-regulatory federal-state-local collaboration working to restore water quality and manage the natural resources of the San Francisco Bay-Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta estuary. The Partnership works with over 100 municipalities, non-profits, governmental agencies, and businesses and helps develop, find funding for, and implement over 40 projects and programs aimed at improving the health of the estuary. The partnership either directly implements these projects, or administers and manages grants, holds educational workshops and highlights project results. The Partnership is also the official representative for the San Francisco Bay region to the Most Beautiful Bays in the World.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act</span> Ok

The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act is clean water act of California that expanded the enforcement authority of the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 Regional Water Quality Control Boards. The act provided for the California Environmental Protection Agency to create the local boards and better protect water rights and water quality.

Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) is a term used by water quality professionals to describe pollutants that have been detected in environmental monitoring samples, that may cause ecological or human health impacts, and typically are not regulated under current environmental laws. Sources of these pollutants include agriculture, urban runoff and ordinary household products and pharmaceuticals that are disposed to sewage treatment plants and subsequently discharged to surface waters.

References

  1. 1 2 Trowbridge, P. R.; Davis, J. A.; Mumley, T.; Taberski, K.; Feger, N.; Valiela, L.; Ervin, J.; Arsem, N.; Olivieri, A.; Carroll, P.; J. Coleman; P. Salopi; R. Sutton; D. Yee; L.J. McKee; M. Sedlak; C. Grosso; J. Kelly (2016). "The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay, California, USA: Science in support of managing water quality". Regional Studies in Marine Science. 4: 21–33. doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2015.10.002 . Retrieved 2017-03-16.
  2. National Research Council (2009). Urban Stormwater Management in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. ISBN   978-0-309-12540-6.
  3. Sharpsteen, Bill (2010). Dirty water: one man's fight to clean up one of the world's most polluted bays. University of California Press. ISBN   978-0-520-94475-6 . Retrieved 2024-08-20.
  4. 1 2 Hoenicke, Rainer; Davis, Jay A.; Gunther, Andrew; Mumley, Thomas E.; Abu-Saba, Khalil; Taberski, Karen (2003-01-01). "Effective Application of Monitoring Information: The Case of San Francisco Bay". Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 81 (1): 15–25. doi:10.1023/A:1021344117229. ISSN   1573-2959 . Retrieved 2024-08-15.
  5. 1 2 SFEI (2017). The Pulse of the Bay: The 25th Anniversary of the RMP. Richmond, CA: San Francisco Estuary Institute. p. 96.
  6. SFEI (2013). 2013 Pulse of the Bay: Contaminants of Emerging Concern. Richmond, California: San Francisco Estuary Institute. p. 98.
  7. Miller, Ezra; Mendez, Miguel; Shimabuku, Ila; Buzby, Nina; Sutton, Rebecca (September 2020). Contaminants of Emerging Concern in San Francisco Bay: A Strategy for Future Investigations 2020 Update (PDF). Richmond, California: San Francisco Estuary Institute. Retrieved 2021-03-16.
  8. Klasing, Susan; Brodberg, Robert (2008). Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels (ATLs) for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, Ddts, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene. CalEPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. p. 122.
  9. Dusterhoff, Scott; Whipple, Alison; Baumgarten, Sean; Robinson, April; Shaw, Samuel; Stark, Kyle; Askevold, Ruth (2023). Restoration Plan for the Laguna de Santa Rosa. Richmond, California: San Francisco Estuary Institute.
  10. Potter, Christopher S.; Croteau, Amanda Nichole. Using Landsat 8 Satellite Imagery to Analyze Biogeochemical Constituents in the Waters of the San Francisco Bay Area and Beyond. American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting 2021. New Orleans, LA/Virtual. Retrieved 2024-08-16.
  11. Linker, Lewis C.; Batiuk, Richard A.; Shenk, Gary W.; Cerco, Carl F. (2013). "Development of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Allocation". JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 49 (5). doi:10.1111/jawr.12105 . Retrieved 2024-08-29.
  12. Koontz, Tomas M.; Thomas, Craig W. (2018-10-01). "Use of science in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from local watershed partnerships in the Puget Sound". Environmental Science & Policy. 88: 17–23. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.007. ISSN   1462-9011 . Retrieved 2024-08-29.
  13. Bernstein, Brock B.; Weisberg, Stephen B. (2003). "Southern California's marine monitoring system ten years after the National Research Council evaluation". Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 81: 3–14. Retrieved 2024-08-29.
  14. Davis, Jay; Flegal, A.; Taberski, K.; Buchan, K.; Tucker, D.; Gunther, A. (2006). The Regional Monitoring Program: Science in Support of Managing Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. Oakland, California. p. 51.
  15. Kleckner, Amy (2024). Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay: 2024 Detailed Workplan and Budget. San Francisco Estuary Institute.
  16. M.M. Foley; J.A. Davis (2022), Charter: Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (PDF), San Francisco Estuary Institute, retrieved 2024-08-16>