Savaging

Last updated
Proper care of piglets by a mother gilt or sow depends on sanitary conditions and a comfortable environment. Prosiaczki.jpg
Proper care of piglets by a mother gilt or sow depends on sanitary conditions and a comfortable environment.

Savaging is a term used in the study of ethology that refers to aggressive behaviour displayed by the mother towards the offspring. Aggressive behaviour includes being rough with, injuring, biting, attacking, crushing and killing (maternal infanticide) of the offspring. While savaging behaviour has been seen in multiple species, it is predominantly demonstrated in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus). As the definition of savaging is so broad, research on the prevalence of savaging behaviour varies with reports of little savaging of offspring to savaging of offspring up to the 20th percentile. Prevalence of aggressive, non-fatal savaging is greater in gilts, or females who have not yet previously farrowed, as piglet-focused aggression is more frequent in young animals than sows, adult females who have previously given birth. [1] Occurrence of savaging demonstrated by sows is greater if the sow has previously savaged her offspring either as a gilt or sow. Savaging behaviour usually occurs during the first two days after parturition. [2] Prevalence of savaging is similar among first and second farrowing cycles. [1] Savaging behaviour has a significant impact on both agricultural economy and animal welfare which is why it is currently a subject of interest in the pig industry.

Contents

Environmental factors

There exist multiple environmental factors that increase the rate of savaging demonstrated by pigs. It has been shown that human attitudes and behaviour can affect the behaviour of domestic pigs. For example, annoyance and transmission of emotions can occur in gilts and sows when a new worker enters the farrowing rooms and makes excessive noise, does not feed the animals in a timely manner and/or is frustrated/annoyed. Research suggests that maternal behaviour may improve when workers and pigs are familiar with their environment and on a set schedule. [1] Another environmental factor that has been examined is the amount of time spent by humans in the farrowing room. Decreased disturbance of the sows by human intrusions during farrowing has indicated a decrease in savaging behavior. [3] Increased aggression in sows is not always directed towards piglets as sows were just as likely to attack inanimate objects (bricks) as they were to attack piglets. [4] As indicated by the fact that aggressive behaviour can be predicted before parturition begins as indicated by pre-farrowing restlessness and the fact that aggression was directed towards both piglets and inanimate objects, sow aggression is not a result of a response to the sudden appearance of piglets. [4] A study by Gonyou and Harris found that increasing light exposure in the farrowing rooms to 16–24 hours per day decreased piglet deaths due to savaging. In the same study, it was found that increased piglet vocalizations around the time of farrowing did not help gilts adjust to the sudden presence of piglets, and instead was shown to increase the amount of piglet-directed aggression. [5] The influence of nest-building and nest-building materials has been shown to influence negative piglet-directed communication. [6] Access to materials as well as higher quality materials such as straw decreased the amount of negative communication between sows and piglets. [6] Similarly, limited space and poor pen conditions have been shown to increase the amount of piglet-directed aggression. [6] Pigs are social animals and a female's social support network can play an important role in postpartum piglet-directed aggression. Free ranging pigs form sounders, or small social units, give young gilts the opportunity to observe gestation and parturition and exposing them to normal maternal behavior. [7] Gilts raised in commercial pens are not exposed to piglets nor expecting mothers and thus are not aware of what to expect during gestation and parturition and are not aware of how to raise piglets. [7] In support of this theory, there is strong evidence that parity influences the amount of savaging and piglet-directed aggression displayed among primiparous gilts versus muiltiparous sows. [4] [6] [7] Some studies have found evidence of increased savaging rates in larger litter sizes as well. [1]

Genetic and biochemical factors

It has been proposed that the degree of aggressive behaviour displayed prior to farrowing cycles by sows and gilts predicts whether the offspring will be savaged and to what extent. [8] Evidence has also been found that savaging sows may be genetically less likely to crush piglets, which lends to the existing research supporting that savaging sows can be competent mothers. Levels of steroid hormones such as estrogens and progestogens around farrowing correspond with levels of maternal aggression. [7] Specifically, high levels of estradiol at postpartum and high levels of pre-farrowing estradiol to progesterone ratios in gilts show more savaging behaviour to piglets. An increase in maternal aggressive behaviour as a result of low levels of progesterone would not be implausible as progesterone has been known to modulate serotonergic receptors. [7] High postpartum levels of estradiol and estriol have also been associated with maternal mood and behaviour. [7] The paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and the amygdala play important roles in moderating anxiety and depression with the PVN being responsible for secreting corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and oxytocin. [7] This would explain the increased amount of CRH in stressed gilts. [7] Abnormal levels of prepartum and postpartum oxytocin have also been linked to increased aggression and savaging as both abnormally high and abnormally low levels has been reported in savaging mothers. [7] Low levels of oxytocin result in fear and aggression as a result of the interaction between oxytocin and the opioid system and has also been linked to insufficient nursing. [6] Low levels of prolactin result in decreased milk let-down, leading to insufficient nursing and limited oxytocin being produced as a result of nursing. [6] Since oxytocin reduces functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, high levels of oxytocin corresponding to an increase in unnresponsiveness to piglet vocalizations would be the result of abnormal HPA pathway functioning. [7] Heritability estimates of 0.11 and 0.25 from half-sib analyses have demonstrated that selection against sow savaging of pigs is possible; however, it may be slow to show effectiveness. [9]

Preventive measures

The pig industry is investing in research regarding savaging behaviours in hopes to diminish the losses they face when gilts and sows commit infanticide. Sedation techniques following birth have prevented savaging; however, in many cases, the onset of aggression is merely delayed. [8] Light exposure has the potential to prevent or limit savaging in pigs as pigs exposed to light for 16–24 hours a day in farrowing room experienced a decrease in the prevalence of savaging. [5] The industry has also attempted to avoid savaging behavior by limiting reproduction in gilts and sows that have previously savaged their offspring. Efforts to eliminate the behavior include additional care and attention to the mother pig during her farrowing cycles. Access to nesting materials such as straw and peat as well as sufficient pen space and conditions around the time of farrowing are also important factors in limiting savaging and piglet-directed aggression in pigs. [6] Increased social interactions and support from sounders also reduces the rate of savaging and piglet-directed aggression, indicating that would be beneficial to raise pigs in a free-roaming environment, but further research is needed to indicate if this would be economically feasible. [7] Restlessness and aggressive behaviour prior to farrowing have been shown to predict savaging and piglet-directed aggression following farrowing, allowing for the identification of individuals prone to savaging and subsequent treatment, precautionary measures, or supervision. [4]

Savaging in other species

Savaging of offspring by the biological mother has been reported in multiple species including farmed silver foxes, farmed wild boar and domestic breeds of farmed pigs. [8] Though aggressive savaging behaviour is demonstrated by other species, it is most commonly used to describe pig aggression. Infanticide in rodents has also been observed, with Syrian hamsters engaging in both infanticide and then cannabalizing some of their offspring following parturition. [10] Syrian hamsters are more likely to savage and successfully kill female offspring compared to male offspring and will cannibalize more offspring if metabolic fuels from food or fat stores are insufficient. [10] This is unlike savaging in pigs, who don't cannabalize piglets and are not motivated to savage by hunger. [4] Similar to pigs, litter size was shown to influence savaging with an increase in Syrian hamster litter size correlating to an increase in maternal infanticide. [10] Research has shown that primiparous silver foxes demonstrate savaging shortly after birth with a 37% chance of killing the offspring through bite wounds. [11] Silver foxes have been shown to engage in savaging behaviour followed by infanticide and cannibalism of the offspring. [11] Savaging in wild boars has been found to have genetic significance as different genetic lines have produced varying degrees of savaging. [12] Wild boars have shown aggression after parturition towards their offspring; however, they have lower infanticide rates than other species.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aggression</span> Social interaction aiming at inflicting harm or unpleasantness

Aggression is a behavior aimed at opposing or attacking something or someone. Though often done with the intent to cause harm, it can be channeled into creative and practical outlets for some. It may occur either reactively or without provocation. In humans, aggression can be caused by various triggers. For example, built-up frustration due to blocked goals or perceived disrespect. Human aggression can be classified into direct and indirect aggression; whilst the former is characterized by physical or verbal behavior intended to cause harm to someone, the latter is characterized by behavior intended to harm the social relations of an individual or group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intensive pig farming</span> Method of animal husbandry

Intensive pig farming, also known as pig factory farming, is the primary method of pig production, in which grower pigs are housed indoors in group-housing or straw-lined sheds, whilst pregnant sows are housed in gestation crates or pens and give birth in farrowing crates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Placentophagy</span> Act of mammals eating the placenta of their young after childbirth

Placentophagy, also known as placentophagia, is the act of consuming part or all of the afterbirth following parturition in mammals. Parturition involves the delivery of the neonate, as well as the placenta and fetal membranes. The placenta is a critical organ that develops in the maternal uterus during pregnancy to support the fetus. It connects to the fetus via the umbilical cord in order to allow nutrient transport, waste excretion and gas exchange between mother and fetus. The morphological features of the placenta differ among species, but the function is universal. The behaviour is characteristic to the mother of the majority of placental mammals. Significant documentation has been provided on placentophagy in a range of animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dog aggression</span> Behavior in dogs

Dog aggression expressed by dogs is considered to be normal behaviour and various types of aggression are influenced by a dog's environment and genetic predisposition. Dogs commonly display possessive aggression when defending resources or themselves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social grooming</span> Behavior in social animals

Social grooming is a behavior in which social animals, including humans, clean or maintain one another's bodies or appearances. A related term, allogrooming, indicates social grooming between members of the same species. Grooming is a major social activity and a means by which animals who live in close proximity may bond, reinforce social structures and family links, and build companionship. Social grooming is also used as a means of conflict resolution, maternal behavior, and reconciliation in some species. Mutual grooming typically describes the act of grooming between two individuals, often as a part of social grooming, pair bonding, or a precoital activity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pig</span> Domesticated omnivorous even-toed ungulate

The pig, also called swine or hog, is an omnivorous, domesticated, even-toed, hoofed mammal. It is named the domestic pig when distinguishing it from other members of the genus Sus. It is considered a subspecies of Sus scrofa by some authorities, but as a distinct species by others. Pigs were domesticated in the Neolithic, both in East Asia and in the Near East. When domesticated pigs arrived in Europe, they extensively interbred with wild boar but retained their domesticated features.

Cross-fostering is a technique used in animal husbandry, animal science, genetic and nature versus nurture studies, and conservation, whereby offspring are removed from their biological parents at birth and raised by surrogates, typically of a different species, hence 'cross.' This can also occasionally occur in nature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannibalism</span> Consuming another individual of the same species as food

Cannibalism is the act of consuming another individual of the same species as food. Cannibalism is a common ecological interaction in the animal kingdom and has been recorded in more than 1,500 species. Human cannibalism is well documented, both in ancient and in recent times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gestation crate</span> Metal enclosure used in intensive pig farming

A gestation crate, also known as a sow stall, is a metal enclosure in which a farmed sow used for breeding may be kept during pregnancy. A standard crate measures 6.6 ft x 2.0 ft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infanticide (zoology)</span> Killing of young offspring by an adult animal of the same species

In animals, infanticide involves the intentional killing of young offspring by a mature animal of the same species. Animal infanticide is studied in zoology, specifically in the field of ethology. Ovicide is the analogous destruction of eggs. The practice has been observed in many species throughout the animal kingdom, especially primates but including microscopic rotifers, insects, fish, amphibians, birds and mammals. Infanticide can be practiced by both males and females.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nesting instinct</span> Instinct in pregnant animals related to estradiol

Nesting behavior refers to an instinct in animals during reproduction to prepare a place with optimal conditions for offspring. The nesting place provides protection against predators and competitors that mean to exploit or kill offspring. It also provides protection against the physical environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pig farming</span> Raising and breeding of domestic pigs

Pig farming, pork farming, or hog farming is the raising and breeding of domestic pigs as livestock, and is a branch of animal husbandry. Pigs are farmed principally for food and skins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infanticide in rodents</span> Termination or consumption of newborn rodents by the parent or another rodent

Infanticide is the termination of a neonate after it has been born, and in zoology this is often the termination or consumption of newborn animals by either a parent or an unrelated adult. In rodents, it is not uncommon for the mother to commit infanticide shortly after parturition under conditions of extreme stress, or for an unrelated male to kill neonates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Placental expulsion</span>

Placental expulsion occurs when the placenta comes out of the birth canal after childbirth. The period from just after the baby is expelled until just after the placenta is expelled is called the third stage of labor.

Animals, including siblings, compete for resources such as food, territory, and potential mating partners. In animal sibling rivalry, individuals compete for parental care or limited resources, which can sometimes result in siblicide, the killing of siblings. Sibling rivalry occurs in many different forms. Siblings may compete for resources in a prenatal and/or post-birth environment. The degree of rivalry varies, ranging from a low level of violence in non-aggressive to the killing of kin in siblicide.

Endocrinology of parenting has been the subject of considerable study with focus both on human females and males and on females and males of other mammalian species. Parenting as an adaptive problem in mammals involves specific endocrine signals that were naturally selected to respond to infant cues and environmental inputs. Infants across species produce a number of cues to inform caregivers of their needs. These include visual cues, like facial characteristics, or in some species smiling, auditory cues, such as vocalizations, olfactory cues, and tactile stimulation. A commonly mentioned hormone in parenting is oxytocin, however many other hormones relay key information that results in variations in behavior. These include estrogen, progesterone, prolactin, cortisol, and testosterone. While hormones are not necessary for the expression of maternal behavior, they may influence it.

Infanticide in non-human primates occurs when an individual kills its own or another individual's dependent young. Five hypotheses have been proposed to explain infanticide in non-human primates: exploitation, resource competition, parental manipulation, sexual selection, and social pathology.

Aggression in cattle is usually a result of fear, learning, and hormonal state, however, many other factors can contribute to aggressive behaviors in cattle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Breastfeeding and mental health</span>

Breastfeeding and mental health is the relationship between postpartum breastfeeding and the mother's and child's mental health. Research indicates breastfeeding may have positive effects on the mother's and child's mental health, though there have been conflicting studies that question the correlation and causation of breastfeeding and maternal mental health. Possible benefits include improved mood and stress levels in the mother, lower risk of postpartum depression, enhanced social emotional development in the child, stronger mother-child bonding and more. Given the benefits of breastfeeding, the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Commission for Public Health (ECPH) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) suggest exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life. Despite these suggestions, estimates indicate 70% of mothers breastfeed their child after birth and 13.5% of infants in the United States are exclusively breastfed. Breastfeeding promotion and support for mothers who are experiencing difficulties or early cessation in breastfeeding is considered a health priority.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Harris, M. J.; Gonyou, H. W.; Li, Y. Z (2003). "Savaging behavior in gilts and sows". Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 83 (4): 819–821. doi: 10.4141/A02-111 .
  2. ↑ Chen, Congying; Gilbert, Colin, L.; Yang, Guangcheng; Guo, Yuanmei; Segonds-Pichon, Anne; Ma, Junqu; Evans, Gary; Brenig, Bertram; Sargent, Carole; Affara, Nabeel; Huang, Lusheng (February 2008). "Maternal infanticide in sows: Incidence and behavioural comparisons between savaging and non-savaging sows at parturition". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 109 (2–4): 238–248. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.02.008.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ↑ Harris, M. J.; Gonyou, H. W (March 2003). "Savaging behaviour in domestic gilts: A study of seven commercial farms". Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 83 (3): 435–444. doi: 10.4141/A02-001 .
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Chen, Congying; Gilbert, Colin L.; Yang, Guangcheng; Guo, Yuanmei; Segonds-Pichon, Anne; Ma, Junwu; Evans, Gary; Brenig, Bertram; Sargent, Carole; Affara, Nabeel; Huang, Lusheng (February 2008). "Maternal infanticide in sows: Incidence and behavioural comparisons between savaging and non-savaging sows at parturition". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 109 (2–4): 238–248. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.02.008.
  5. 1 2 Harris, M. J.; Gonyou, H. W. (2003-09-01). "Savaging behaviour in domestic gilts: A study of seven commercial farms". Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 83 (3): 435–444. doi: 10.4141/A02-001 . ISSN   0008-3984.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rosvold, Ellen Marie; Newberry, Ruth C.; Andersen, Inger Lise (2019-10-01). "Early mother-young interactions in domestic sows – Nest-building material increases maternal investment". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 219: 104837. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104837. hdl: 11250/2670800 . ISSN   0168-1591. S2CID   201405193.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Daigle, Courtney (2018-02-06). "Parallels between Postpartum Disorders in Humans and Preweaning Piglet Mortality in Sows". Animals. 8 (2): 22. doi: 10.3390/ani8020022 . ISSN   2076-2615. PMC   5836030 . PMID   29485618.
  8. 1 2 3 Turner, Simon P. (October 2011). "Breeding against harmful social behaviours in pigs and chickens: State of the art and the way forward". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 134 (1–2): 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.001.
  9. ↑ McGlone, John J. (1991). "Techniques for evaluation and quantification of pig reproductive, ingestive, and social behaviours" (PDF). Journal of Animal Science. 69 (10): 4146–4154. doi:10.2527/1991.69104146x. PMID   1778829. S2CID   23767562. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-12-01.
  10. 1 2 3 Beery, Annaliese K.; Zucker, Irving (2012-10-10). "Sex ratio adjustment by sex-specific maternal cannibalism in hamsters". Physiology & Behavior. 107 (3): 271–276. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.09.001. ISSN   0031-9384. PMID   22982672. S2CID   26335169.
  11. 1 2 Braastad, Bjarne O.; Bakken, Morten (May 1993). "Maternal infanticide and periparturient behaviour in farmed silver foxes Vulpes vulpes". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 36 (4): 347–361. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90132-9.
  12. ↑ Harris, Moira J.; Bergeron, Renée; Gonyou, Harold W. (October 2001). "Parturient behaviour and offspring-directed aggression in farmed wild boar of three genetic lines". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 74 (2): 153–163. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00160-5.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.