Scanning quantum dot microscopy

Last updated November 02, 2023

Scanning quantum dot microscopy (SQDM) is a scanning probe microscopy (SPM) that is used to image nanoscale electric potential distributions on surfaces.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4] The method quantifies surface potential variations via their influence on the potential of a quantum dot (QD) attached to the apex of the scanned probe. SQDM allows, for example, the quantification of surface dipoles originating from individual adatoms, molecules, or nanostructures. This gives insights into surface and interface mechanisms such as reconstruction or relaxation, mechanical distortion, charge transfer and chemical interaction. Measuring electric potential distributions is also relevant for characterizing organic and inorganic semiconductor devices which feature electric dipole layers at the relevant interfaces. The probe to surface distance in SQDM ranges from 2 nm^[1]^[3] to 10 nm^[2] and therefore allows imaging on non-planar surfaces or, e.g., of biomolecules with a distinct 3D structure. Related imaging techniques are Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM) and Electrostatic Force Microscopy (EFM).

Working principle

In SQDM, the relation between the potential at the QD and the surface potential (the quantity of interest) is described by a boundary value problem of electrostatics. The boundary ${\mathcal {S}}$ is given by the surfaces of sample and probe assumed to be connected at infinity. Then, the potential $\Phi _{\text{QD}}=\Phi (\mathbf {r} )$ of a point-like QD at $\mathbf {r}$ can be expressed using the Green's function formalism as a sum over volume and surface integrals,^[5] where ${\mathcal {V}}$ denotes the volume enclosed by ${\mathcal {S}}$ and $\mathbf {n} '$ is the surface normal.

\Phi _{\text{QD}}=\Phi (\mathbf {r} )=\iiint \limits _{\mathcal {V}}G(\mathbf {r} ,\mathbf {r} '){\frac {\rho (\mathbf {r} ')}{e}}d^{3}\mathbf {r} '+{\frac {\epsilon _{0}}{e}}\oint \limits _{\mathcal {S}}{\bigg [}G(\mathbf {r} ,\mathbf {r} '){\frac {\partial \Phi (\mathbf {r} ')}{\partial \mathbf {n} '}}-\Phi (\mathbf {r} '){\frac {\partial G(\mathbf {r} ,\mathbf {r} ')}{\partial \mathbf {n} '}}{\bigg ]}d^{2}\mathbf {r} '.

In this expression, $\Phi _{\text{QD}}$ depends on the charge density $\rho$ inside ${\mathcal {V}}$ and on the potential $\Phi$ on ${\mathcal {S}}$ weighted by the Green's function

G(\mathbf {r} ,\mathbf {r} ')={\frac {e}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '|}}+F(\mathbf {r} ,\mathbf {r} '),

where $F$ satisfies the Laplace equation.

By specifying $F$ and thus defining the boundary conditions, these equations can be used to obtain the relation between $\Phi _{\text{QD}}$ and the surface potential $\Phi _{\text{s}}(\mathbf {r} '),\quad \mathbf {r} '\in {\mathcal {S}}$ for more specific measurement situations. The combination of a conductive probe and a conductive surface, a situation characterized by Dirichlet boundary conditions, has been described in detail.^[4]

Conceptually, the relation between $\Phi _{\text{QD}}(\mathbf {r} )$ and $\Phi _{\text{s}}(\mathbf {r} ')$ links data in the imaging plane, obtained by reading out the QD potential, to data in the object surface - the surface potential. If the sample surface is approximated as locally flat and the relation between $\Phi _{\text{QD}}(\mathbf {r} )$ and $\Phi _{\text{s}}(\mathbf {r} ')$ therefore translationally invariant, the recovery of the object surface information from the imaging plane information is a deconvolution with a point spread function defined by the boundary value problem. In the specific case of a conductive boundary, the mutual screening of surface potentials by tip and surface lead to an exponential drop-off of the point spread function.^[4]^[6] This causes the exceptionally high lateral resolution of SQDM at large tip-surface separations compared to, for example, KPFM.^[3]

Practical implementation

Two methods have been reported to obtain the imaging plane information, i.e., the variations in the QD potential $\Phi _{\text{QD}}(\mathbf {r} )$ as the probe is scanned over the surface. In the compensation technique, $\Phi _{\text{QD}}$ is held at a constant value $\Phi _{\text{QD}}^{0}$ . The influence of the laterally varying surface potentials on $\Phi _{\text{QD}}$ is actively compensated by continuously adjusting the global sample potential via an external bias voltage $V_{\text{b}}$ .^[1]^[7] $\Phi _{\text{QD}}^{0}$ is chosen such that it matches a discrete transition of the QD charge state and the corresponding change in probe-sample force is used in non-contact atomic force microscopy ^[8]^[9] to verify a correct compensation.

In an alternative method, the vertical component of the electric field at the QD position is mapped by measuring the energy shift of a specific optical transition of the QD^[2]^[10] which occurs due to the Stark effect. This method requires an additional optical setup in addition to the SPM setup.

The object plane image $\Phi _{\text{s}}(\mathbf {r} ')$ can be interpreted as a variation of the work function, the surface potential, or the surface dipole density. The equivalence of these quantities is given by the Helmholtz equation. Within the surface dipole density interpretation, surface dipoles of individual nanostructures can be obtained by integration over a sufficiently large surface area.

Topographic information from SQDM

In the compensation technique, the influence of the global sample potential $V_{\text{b}}$ on $\Phi _{\text{QD}}$ depends on the shape of the sample surface in a way that is defined by the corresponding boundary value problem. On a non-planar surface, changes in $\Phi _{\text{QD}}$ can therefore not uniquely be assigned to either a change in surface potential or in surface topography $t_{\text{d}}$ if only a single charge state transition is tracked. For example, a protrusion in the surface affects the QD potential since the gating by $V_{\text{b}}$ works more efficiently if the QD is placed above the protrusion. If two transitions are used in the compensation technique the contributions of surface topography $t_{\text{d}}$ and potential $\Phi _{\text{s}}$ can be disentangled and both quantities can be obtained unambiguously. The topographic information obtained via the compensation technique is an effective dielectric topography of metallic nature which is defined by the geometric topography and the dielectric properties of the sample surface or of a nanostructure.

Related Research Articles

Noether's theorem or Noether's first theorem states that every differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system with conservative forces has a corresponding conservation law. The theorem was proven by mathematician Emmy Noether in 1915 and published in 1918. The action of a physical system is the integral over time of a Lagrangian function, from which the system's behavior can be determined by the principle of least action. This theorem only applies to continuous and smooth symmetries over physical space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hamiltonian mechanics</span> Formulation of classical mechanics using momenta

Hamiltonian mechanics emerged in 1833 as a reformulation of Lagrangian mechanics. Introduced by Sir William Rowan Hamilton, Hamiltonian mechanics replaces (generalized) velocities $used in Lagrangian mechanics with (generalized) momenta . Both theories provide interpretations of classical mechanics and describe the same physical phenomena.$

Electron density or electronic density is the measure of the probability of an electron being present at an infinitesimal element of space surrounding any given point. It is a scalar quantity depending upon three spatial variables and is typically denoted as either $or . The density is determined, through definition, by the normalised -electron wavefunction which itself depends upon variables. Conversely, the density determines the wave function modulo up to a phase factor, providing the formal foundation of density functional theory.$

In theoretical physics and mathematical physics, analytical mechanics, or theoretical mechanics is a collection of closely related alternative formulations of classical mechanics. It was developed by many scientists and mathematicians during the 18th century and onward, after Newtonian mechanics. Since Newtonian mechanics considers vector quantities of motion, particularly accelerations, momenta, forces, of the constituents of the system, an alternative name for the mechanics governed by Newton's laws and Euler's laws is vectorial mechanics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stark effect</span> Spectral line splitting in electrical field

The Stark effect is the shifting and splitting of spectral lines of atoms and molecules due to the presence of an external electric field. It is the electric-field analogue of the Zeeman effect, where a spectral line is split into several components due to the presence of the magnetic field. Although initially coined for the static case, it is also used in the wider context to describe the effect of time-dependent electric fields. In particular, the Stark effect is responsible for the pressure broadening of spectral lines by charged particles in plasmas. For most spectral lines, the Stark effect is either linear or quadratic with a high accuracy.

In physics, canonical quantization is a procedure for quantizing a classical theory, while attempting to preserve the formal structure, such as symmetries, of the classical theory to the greatest extent possible.

A classical field theory is a physical theory that predicts how one or more physical fields interact with matter through field equations, without considering effects of quantization; theories that incorporate quantum mechanics are called quantum field theories. In most contexts, 'classical field theory' is specifically intended to describe electromagnetism and gravitation, two of the fundamental forces of nature.

In atomic physics, the electron magnetic moment, or more specifically the electron magnetic dipole moment, is the magnetic moment of an electron resulting from its intrinsic properties of spin and electric charge. The value of the electron magnetic moment is −9.2847647043(28)×10⁻²⁴ J⋅T⁻¹. In units of the Bohr magneton (μ_B), it is −1.00115965218059(13) μ_B, a value that was measured with a relative accuracy of 1.3×10⁻¹³.

Magnetic force microscopy (MFM) is a variety of atomic force microscopy, in which a sharp magnetized tip scans a magnetic sample; the tip-sample magnetic interactions are detected and used to reconstruct the magnetic structure of the sample surface. Many kinds of magnetic interactions are measured by MFM, including magnetic dipole–dipole interaction. MFM scanning often uses non-contact AFM (NC-AFM) mode.

Phase-contrast imaging is a method of imaging that has a range of different applications. It measures differences in the refractive index of different materials to differentiate between structures under analysis. In conventional light microscopy, phase contrast can be employed to distinguish between structures of similar transparency, and to examine crystals on the basis of their double refraction. This has uses in biological, medical and geological science. In X-ray tomography, the same physical principles can be used to increase image contrast by highlighting small details of differing refractive index within structures that are otherwise uniform. In transmission electron microscopy (TEM), phase contrast enables very high resolution (HR) imaging, making it possible to distinguish features a few Angstrom apart.

The method of image charges is a basic problem-solving tool in electrostatics. The name originates from the replacement of certain elements in the original layout with imaginary charges, which replicates the boundary conditions of the problem.

Ewald summation, named after Paul Peter Ewald, is a method for computing long-range interactions in periodic systems. It was first developed as the method for calculating the electrostatic energies of ionic crystals, and is now commonly used for calculating long-range interactions in computational chemistry. Ewald summation is a special case of the Poisson summation formula, replacing the summation of interaction energies in real space with an equivalent summation in Fourier space. In this method, the long-range interaction is divided into two parts: a short-range contribution, and a long-range contribution which does not have a singularity. The short-range contribution is calculated in real space, whereas the long-range contribution is calculated using a Fourier transform. The advantage of this method is the rapid convergence of the energy compared with that of a direct summation. This means that the method has high accuracy and reasonable speed when computing long-range interactions, and it is thus the de facto standard method for calculating long-range interactions in periodic systems. The method requires charge neutrality of the molecular system to accurately calculate the total Coulombic interaction. A study of the truncation errors introduced in the energy and force calculations of disordered point-charge systems is provided by Kolafa and Perram.

In spectroscopy, the Autler–Townes effect, is a dynamical Stark effect corresponding to the case when an oscillating electric field is tuned in resonance to the transition frequency of a given spectral line, and resulting in a change of the shape of the absorption/emission spectra of that spectral line. The AC Stark effect was discovered in 1955 by American physicists Stanley Autler and Charles Townes.

Entanglement distillation is the transformation of N copies of an arbitrary entangled state $into some number of approximately pure Bell pairs, using only local operations and classical communication.$

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Förster coupling</span> Resonant energy transfer between excitons within adjacent QDs (quantum dots)

Förster coupling is the resonant energy transfer between excitons within adjacent QD's. The first studies of Forster were performed in the context of the sensitized luminescence of solids. Here, an excited sensitizer atom can transfer its excitation to a neighbouring acceptor atom, via an intermediate virtual photon. This same mechanism has also been shown to be responsible for exciton transfer between QD’s and within molecular systems and biosystems, all of which may be treated in a similar formulation.

In physics, a gauge theory is a type of field theory in which the Lagrangian, and hence the dynamics of the system itself, do not change under local transformations according to certain smooth families of operations. Formally, the Lagrangian is invariant.

In physics, Berry connection and Berry curvature are related concepts which can be viewed, respectively, as a local gauge potential and gauge field associated with the Berry phase or geometric phase. The concept was first introduced by S. Pancharatnam as geometric phase and later elaborately explained and popularized by Michael Berry in a paper published in 1984 emphasizing how geometric phases provide a powerful unifying concept in several branches of classical and quantum physics.

The electric dipole moment is a measure of the separation of positive and negative electrical charges within a system, that is, a measure of the system's overall polarity. The SI unit for electric dipole moment is the coulomb-meter (C⋅m). The debye (D) is another unit of measurement used in atomic physics and chemistry.

Lagrangian field theory is a formalism in classical field theory. It is the field-theoretic analogue of Lagrangian mechanics. Lagrangian mechanics is used to analyze the motion of a system of discrete particles each with a finite number of degrees of freedom. Lagrangian field theory applies to continua and fields, which have an infinite number of degrees of freedom.

In theoretical physics, Hamiltonian field theory is the field-theoretic analogue to classical Hamiltonian mechanics. It is a formalism in classical field theory alongside Lagrangian field theory. It also has applications in quantum field theory.

References

1 2 3 Wagner, Christian; Green, Matthew F. B.; Leinen, Philipp; Deilmann, Thorsten; Krüger, Peter; Rohlfing, Michael; Temirov, Ruslan; Tautz, F. Stefan (2015-07-06). "Scanning Quantum Dot Microscopy". Physical Review Letters. 115 (2): 026101. arXiv: 1503.07738 . Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115b6101W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.026101. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 26207484. S2CID 1720328.
1 2 3 Cadeddu, D.; Munsch, M.; Rossi, N.; Gérard, J.-M.; Claudon, J.; Warburton, R. J.; Poggio, M. (2017-09-29). "Electric-Field Sensing with a Scanning Fiber-Coupled Quantum Dot". Physical Review Applied. 8 (3): 031002. arXiv: 1705.03358 . Bibcode:2017PhRvP...8c1002C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.031002. ISSN 2331-7019. S2CID 55186378.
1 2 3 Wagner, Christian; Green, Matthew. F. B.; Maiworm, Michael; Leinen, Philipp; Esat, Taner; Ferri, Nicola; Friedrich, Niklas; Findeisen, Rolf; Tkatchenko, Alexandre; Temirov, Ruslan; Tautz, F. Stefan (August 2019). "Quantitative imaging of electric surface potentials with single-atom sensitivity". Nature Materials. 18 (8): 853–859. Bibcode:2019NatMa..18..853W. doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0382-8. ISSN 1476-1122. PMC 6656579 . PMID 31182779.
1 2 3 Wagner, Christian; Tautz, F Stefan (2019-11-27). "The theory of scanning quantum dot microscopy". Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 31 (47): 475901. arXiv: 1905.06153 . Bibcode:2019JPCM...31U5901W. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ab2d09. ISSN 0953-8984. PMID 31242473. S2CID 155093213.
↑ Jackson, John David (1999). Classical electrodynamics . New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0471309321.
↑ Pumplin, Jon (July 1969). "Application of Sommerfeld-Watson Transformation to an Electrostatics Problem". American Journal of Physics. 37 (7): 737–739. Bibcode:1969AmJPh..37..737P. doi:10.1119/1.1975793. ISSN 0002-9505. OSTI 1444624. S2CID 16826555.
↑ Maiworm, Michael; Wagner, Christian; Temirov, Ruslan; Tautz, F. Stefan; Findeisen, Rolf (June 2018). "Two-degree-of-freedom control combining machine learning and extremum seeking for fast scanning quantum dot microscopy". 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC). Milwaukee, WI, USA: IEEE. pp. 4360–4366. doi:10.23919/ACC.2018.8431022. ISBN 978-1-5386-5428-6. S2CID 52022668.
↑ Woodside, M. T. (2002-05-10). "Scanned Probe Imaging of Single-Electron Charge States in Nanotube Quantum Dots". Science. 296 (5570): 1098–1101. Bibcode:2002Sci...296.1098W. doi:10.1126/science.1069923. PMID 12004123. S2CID 15349675.
↑ Stomp, Romain; Miyahara, Yoichi; Schaer, Sacha; Sun, Qingfeng; Guo, Hong; Grutter, Peter; Studenikin, Sergei; Poole, Philip; Sachrajda, Andy (2005-02-08). "Detection of Single-Electron Charging in an Individual InAs Quantum Dot by Noncontact Atomic-Force Microscopy". Physical Review Letters. 94 (5): 056802. arXiv: cond-mat/0501272 . Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94e6802S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.056802. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 15783674. S2CID 207182.
↑ Lee, Joonhee; Tallarida, Nicholas; Chen, Xing; Jensen, Lasse; Apkarian, V. Ara (June 2018). "Microscopy with a single-molecule scanning electrometer". Science Advances. 4 (6): eaat5472. Bibcode:2018SciA....4.5472L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat5472. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 6025905 . PMID 29963637.

External links

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[:1-1] 1 2 3 Wagner, Christian; Green, Matthew F. B.; Leinen, Philipp; Deilmann, Thorsten; Krüger, Peter; Rohlfing, Michael; Temirov, Ruslan; Tautz, F. Stefan (2015-07-06). "Scanning Quantum Dot Microscopy". Physical Review Letters. 115 (2): 026101. arXiv: 1503.07738 . Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115b6101W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.026101. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 26207484. S2CID 1720328.

[:0-2] 1 2 3 Cadeddu, D.; Munsch, M.; Rossi, N.; Gérard, J.-M.; Claudon, J.; Warburton, R. J.; Poggio, M. (2017-09-29). "Electric-Field Sensing with a Scanning Fiber-Coupled Quantum Dot". Physical Review Applied. 8 (3): 031002. arXiv: 1705.03358 . Bibcode:2017PhRvP...8c1002C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.031002. ISSN 2331-7019. S2CID 55186378.

[:2-3] 1 2 3 Wagner, Christian; Green, Matthew. F. B.; Maiworm, Michael; Leinen, Philipp; Esat, Taner; Ferri, Nicola; Friedrich, Niklas; Findeisen, Rolf; Tkatchenko, Alexandre; Temirov, Ruslan; Tautz, F. Stefan (August 2019). "Quantitative imaging of electric surface potentials with single-atom sensitivity". Nature Materials. 18 (8): 853–859. Bibcode:2019NatMa..18..853W. doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0382-8. ISSN 1476-1122. PMC 6656579 . PMID 31182779.

[:3-4] 1 2 3 Wagner, Christian; Tautz, F Stefan (2019-11-27). "The theory of scanning quantum dot microscopy". Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 31 (47): 475901. arXiv: 1905.06153 . Bibcode:2019JPCM...31U5901W. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ab2d09. ISSN 0953-8984. PMID 31242473. S2CID 155093213.

[5] Jackson, John David (1999). Classical electrodynamics . New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0471309321.

[6] Pumplin, Jon (July 1969). "Application of Sommerfeld-Watson Transformation to an Electrostatics Problem". American Journal of Physics. 37 (7): 737–739. Bibcode:1969AmJPh..37..737P. doi:10.1119/1.1975793. ISSN 0002-9505. OSTI 1444624. S2CID 16826555.

[7] Maiworm, Michael; Wagner, Christian; Temirov, Ruslan; Tautz, F. Stefan; Findeisen, Rolf (June 2018). "Two-degree-of-freedom control combining machine learning and extremum seeking for fast scanning quantum dot microscopy". 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC). Milwaukee, WI, USA: IEEE. pp. 4360–4366. doi:10.23919/ACC.2018.8431022. ISBN 978-1-5386-5428-6. S2CID 52022668.

[8] Woodside, M. T. (2002-05-10). "Scanned Probe Imaging of Single-Electron Charge States in Nanotube Quantum Dots". Science. 296 (5570): 1098–1101. Bibcode:2002Sci...296.1098W. doi:10.1126/science.1069923. PMID 12004123. S2CID 15349675.

[9] Stomp, Romain; Miyahara, Yoichi; Schaer, Sacha; Sun, Qingfeng; Guo, Hong; Grutter, Peter; Studenikin, Sergei; Poole, Philip; Sachrajda, Andy (2005-02-08). "Detection of Single-Electron Charging in an Individual InAs Quantum Dot by Noncontact Atomic-Force Microscopy". Physical Review Letters. 94 (5): 056802. arXiv: cond-mat/0501272 . Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94e6802S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.056802. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 15783674. S2CID 207182.

[10] Lee, Joonhee; Tallarida, Nicholas; Chen, Xing; Jensen, Lasse; Apkarian, V. Ara (June 2018). "Microscopy with a single-molecule scanning electrometer". Science Advances. 4 (6): eaat5472. Bibcode:2018SciA....4.5472L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat5472. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 6025905 . PMID 29963637.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]