A settler or colonist is a person who establishes or joins a permanent presence that is separate to existing communities. The entity that settlers establish is a settlement. A settler is called a pioneer if they are among the first settling at a place that is new to the settler community. [1] While settlers can act independently, they may receive support from the government of their nation or its colonial empire, or from a non-governmental organization, as part of a larger campaign.
The process of settling land can be, and has often been, controversial; while human migration is itself a normal phenomenon, it has not been uncommon throughout human history for settlers to have arrived in already-inhabited lands without the intention of living alongside the native population. In these cases, the conflict that arises between the settlers and the natives, or Indigenous peoples, may result in warfare and possibly the dispossession of the latter within the contested territory desired, usually violently. [2]
The lifestyle of a native population is often disturbed or destroyed if they come into contact with a settler population, particularly when the settler population seeks to mostly replace them. [3] Settlers may also engender a change in culture, or alteration of the existing culture, among the natives. [4] New populations have also been created by the mixing of settlers and natives, including Cape Coloureds in South Africa and Anglo-Indians. [5] [6]
Many times throughout history, settlers occupied land that was previously inhabited by long-established peoples, who are designated as "native" or "Indigenous". The process by which Indigenous territories are settled by foreign peoples is usually called settler colonialism. [7] Such a process relies upon dispossession, often violent. [2]
In the figurative usage, a pioneer (a "person who goes first or does something first") also applies to the American English use of "pioneer" to refer to a settler –a person who has migrated to a less-densely occupied area and established permanent residence there, often to colonize the area, as recorded in the English language from at least 1605. [8] [9] In United States history, "settlers" can refer to the Europeans who were part of the process of settling lands which were new to them.
The Russian Empire regularly invited Russian subjects and foreign nationals to settle in sparsely populated lands, mostly in North Asia, but also in Central Asia and the Russian Far East. [10] Such exercises resulted in the inception of Slavo-Serbia, the Volga Germans, Volhynia, Russians in Kazakhstan and Green Ukraine, among other phenomena.
Although settlers in the early modern era frequently made use of sea-routes, significant waves of settlement could also use long overland routes, as in the 19th-century cases of the Great Trek by the Boer-Afrikaners in South Africa, or of the Oregon Trail in the United States.
Anthropologists record the tribal displacement of native settlers who drive another tribe from the lands it held. Examples include:
In Canada, the term "settler" is used by some to characterise "the non-Indigenous peoples living in Canada who form the European-descended sociopolitical majority", thereby suggesting that settler colonialism is an ongoing phenomenon. The usage is controversial. [12] [13] [14]
In the Middle East and North Africa, there are more recent examples of settler communities being established:
The right of freedom of movement may imply that anyone may settle anywhere, laws and limitations notwithstanding, and non-African modern humans, who originated in Africa, all descend from settlers who travelled elsewhere. However, various types of settlers may stand out in initial settlement-patterns:
Societies with rigid structural institutions such as primogeniture may make it desirable for younger sons to settle elsewhere. [a] The American slogan "Go West, young man" directly addresses the young in promoting settlement of the American West. And folk-tales exemplify the role of younger brothers: the archetypal youngest son must go out into the world to seek his fortune; often he rescues and marries a (foreign) princess and inherits half of her father's kingdom. [b]
Social systems featuring habits of polygyny or of concubinage, which occurred commonly in pre-modern society, [26] [27] can generate quantities of unmarriageable young men. They can produce new ethnic groups abroad – including secondary settler-populations (descendants of settlers who themselves can become settlers) such as the Métis in Canada [28] and the Griqua people in southern Africa. [29] [30]
Britain exported indentured convicts to its North American settlements, [31] [32] and later (1788 to 1868) to the Australian colonies which convicts and ex-convicts helped to develop and to populate. [33] Russia and the Soviet Union developed and peopled much of Siberia with convicts and exiles. [34] France sent convicts to Devil's Island in French Guiana [35] [36] and exiled socialist revolutionary communards and other prisoners to New Caledonia. [37] Disgraced remittance-men might skulk on the outskirts of settler society: paid by their relatives to stay a decent distance away from the metropole. [38]
Frontiersmen and colonial entrepreneurs represent the classical romantic type of "sturdy-pioneer" settlers. Portuguese and Spanish conquistadors, British traders in India and pioneer planters in the early colonies of the Southern United States belong traditionally in this group. Some early colonial land-grants made ownership conditional on attracting more people via headrights – using territory to lure settlers who would recruit further settlers. Gold rushes drew many people, some of whom subsequently became settlers in remote lands (Brazil, California, and Australia, for example). [39] [40] Economic incentives have long influenced the movements of migrants [41] [42] – most recently in the form of "golden passports". [43]
Political, religious, or economic oppression or disadvantage can induce whole sub-groups to emigrate. Anti-monarchist Norsemen traditionally settled Iceland; [44] [45] nomad tribes seek more favorable territories for temporary or permanent settlement; [46] Puritans fled from Europe to North America; Jews move to and fro across the globe; disadvantaged people from (for example) the Third World seek opportunities elsewhere.
Families, fiances and fellow-villagers (for example) can follow earlier settlers to new lands. The practice of chain migration requires reverse communication or return migration, but has a long tradition with several variants. Chain migration, with voyaging to and fro, can explain the island-hopping strategies that led to the peopling of the Pacific Ocean by Austronesian peoples from about 3000 BCE onwards. [47] [48] Seventeenth-century France exported les Filles du Roy to French settlements in Canada with the aim of stabilising and boosting the population of the French settler society there. [49] In the 1950s, young women from the Netherlands arrived in New Zealand by the plane-load with a view to marrying their erstwile compatriots. [50]
The reasons for the emigration of settlers vary, but often they include the following factors and incentives: the desire to start a new and better life in a foreign land, personal financial hardship, social, cultural, ethnic, or religious persecution (e.g., the Pilgrims and Mormons), penal deportation (e.g. of convicted criminals from England to Australia), political oppression, and governmental incentive-policies aimed at encouraging foreign settlement. [51] [52] [53]
Accounts of the "barbarian" Völkerwanderung of Late antiquity in Eurasia give the impression that whole tribes sometimes migrated en masse into new areas of settlement: warriors bringing their households ("women and children") with them. [54] Postulated causes of these mass-migrations include:
This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards, as section.(January 2026) |
| | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding missing information. (January 2026) |
Humans have taken various approaches when starting and sustaining the settling process, and may employ such means individually, successively or in parallel:
Initially, settlers come as travelers – in vehicles, on horseback, or on foot. [60] The first hours and days of settlement resemble the journey, with supplies and comestibles brought by and with the incomers. The first human settlers arriving on Mars, for example, must expect to carry with them all things needed in order for them to survive for a lengthy period of time: not just food and water, but oxygen as well; not just clothing and shelter, but protection against radiation and against low atmospheric pressure. Sustaining such an unintegrated settlement over the long haul requires careful and detailed planning.
A completely uninhabited target territory for settling – a true terra nullius – minimises potential land-ownership disputes. Thus the first Polynesian settlers in the Pacific Islands, [61] or the early Norse settlers in medieval Iceland and Greenland, [62] or the pioneering French settlers in the Falkland Islands/Malvinas in 1764, [63] could unload their belongings and start farming, hunting or fishing in short order. Self-sufficient settlements may result – until the economic and other processes of globalisation come to bear. [64]
Incoming settlers seen as invaders may not last long. [c] Wholesale land-grabs with a view to settlement can prove costly and provoke reaction. [d] Limited numbers of immigrants with a reputation for behaving arrogantly in a culturally hostile environment may have to operate under disadvantageous conditions. [e] It often pays to make friends with existing populations [f] and to establish mutually beneficial trading [g] or military [h] relationships: survival may depend on some degree of integration into a local environment and society. It may help incoming arrivals to find or invent a legend of invitation [i] (an invitation implies friendly agreement with at least some element of the locals, such as (for example) an oppressed tribe, or a (formerly) ruling faction fallen on hard times). Trade-oriented settlers may establish a modus vivendi with their local compradors. [73]
Failing a speedy social integration, settlers and locals may form distinct groups, classes or castes. [j] (The "divide and rule" mantra has general application.) One group may harness the labor of another through tribute, wages, servanthood or slavery. New trading patterns may alter existing economies. [k] Social and cultural boundaries may arise. In reaction, earlier populations may move away (forcibly or voluntarily), [l] succumb to genocide, exploitation or disease, [m] or revolt.
If settlement results, by whatever means, in reducing or eliminating earlier populations, this is one possible cause of gaps in the economic system, deficiencies which may result in fewer trading opportunities, under-exploited lands and waters, and a dearth of cheap available labor. Mass new immigration can fill such gaps, but suitable volunteers may come in insufficient numbers. Enter the systems of indentured labor, [n] transported felons, [o] and imported slaves. [p]
Where the environment permits, settlers can express a preference for familiar landscapes and economies mirroring their metropole. Thus fields of crops and clusters of commercial urban centers can emerge in distant lands. [q]
Apart from any demographic, military or strategic use, metropoles can view new settlements as suppliers of goods [r] and as markets for metropolitan products. [s] Theoretically, mercantilist practices emphasise the role of colonies in enriching the motherland. [93] But perceived exploitation of or by settlers can lead to ruptures between new lands and the settlers' ancestral homelands (as with the Thirteen Colonies in the 1770s, or Ireland in the 20th century).
Brazil, peopled by formerly Portuguese settlers, became the headquarters of the Portuguese Empire in 1808, then established independence and its own Brazilian Empire in 1822; Luso-Brazilians now arguably wield more heft than the citizens of their former metropole. Propaganda encouraging British settlement in New Zealand envisaged the antipodes as a "better Britain". [94] And the United States of America has somewhat outgrown its former role as a cluster of British settlements on the fringes of the north-west Atlantic to become a major force in the Anglosphere.
The impacts were consequences of colonial relations that threatened Indigenous identities, resources, languages, traditions, spirituality, and ways of life.
Ingoldsby [...] analyzed Murdoch's Ethnographic Atlas of 1967 and found that polygyny was prevalent in 84.8% of the societies.
[...] concubinage was quite widespread and common throughout the entire medieval period in Europe [...] there was no formal prohibition of lay concubinage until the sixteenth century.
Stipulations under the Dominion Lands Act regarding the procedure for officially registering a parcel of land proved difficult fo Métis settlers. [...] Métis settlers [...] maintained their distinct form of land holding based on the red River system of allotment. [...] Métis settlers at St. Louis [...] refused to submit their lands to the township survey system and requested that the government resurvey their lands into river lots based on their traditional system of land holding.
[...] for several years there were also complaints of attacks on the Griqua settlers and cattle raiding by the Bushmen in the area . The Griquas were, with Dr Philip's active encouragement and the blessing of the Colonial Government, moving into territory traditionally occupied by the Bushmen [...]. [...] Bushman resistance to Griqua settlement was gradually broken during the 1830s [...].
The Transorangian Griqua case indicates clearly that, although genocidal struggles between Indigenous peoples and European colonists have often been cast as the product of racial antagonisms, they were not principally racial in character. They were essentially about incompatible ways of vying for the same scarce resources and the right to occupy particular areas of land. Despite being Indigenous, Griqua settlers became as determined slaughterers of San as were the European colonists.
[...] after the 1718 Transportation Act, shipping and receiving convicts became a far larger business than ever before, with hundreds a year leaving Britain for America, going mainly to the Cheaspeake colonies of Virginia and Maryland. [...] it was the British who in the eighteenth century made transportation a key element of their penal policy, and the consequences for some of their colonies were profound, both economically and culturally.
On involuntary European migration (transported convicts and other prisoners) [...] Ekirch suggests 50,000 convicts transported during the eighteenth century, Fogelmean 2,300 during the seventeenth century and 52,200 during the eighteenth.
Not all who were sentenced to transportation were actually transported. Generally, it was only those under the age of fifty who had been convicted at least twice. [...] Large numbers of Australian convicts were young. Over the period of transportation up until 1851, between 27 per cent and 30 percent of London convicts were under 19 years of age. [...] Most convicts were put to work for the government or for private individuals. They formed an unpaid workforce which helped farm the colony and create the early buildings and streets around Sydney cove. [...] Those who in the mind of the authorities behaved themselves were granted 'tickets of leave' and later conditional or full pardons for their past offences. Some returned home but most remained.
Siberia resembles Australia in a number of ways [...]. Convict settlement was important in the development of it [...] the prison and concentration camp population of the USSR was at its peak during the late 1930s and 40s, and has been estimated at ten million, most of them in Siberia and the Far East. As the free population of Siberia and the Far East in 1939 was 17.3 million, the proportion of prisoners to free citizens must have been over one to two.
[...] the penal colony in Guyane to which 67,000 prisoners were shipped until the establishments were closed after the Second World War. [...] France wanted to show its settlers as honest pioneers, not malefactors.
[...] convicts and ex-convicts [in French Guiana] represented a stable, long-resident population for research – unlike their officers or the troops of the garrison who rotated every two years.
In last December, the total number of convicts and ex-convicts in New Caledonia was 7,362, but of these the whereabouts of 500 were unknown; they had either escaped to Australia or New Guinea or died in the bush. Of the liberated convicts 4,783 were over 40 years of age, and only 459 were younger [...]. [...] The total white population in 1906, when a general census was taken, was 19,570 [...] in the free population, [...] of 11,656 persons 6,138 were male and 5,518 were female [...].
Another class of settler in the British Northwest Territory is composed of what are called 'Remittance' Englishmen, – the scapegraces of families of social position. The 'Remittance' Englishman does not work; his family are content if he will only keep away from England – the further away the better, so that the expense of a return ticket will insure against his returning, and care is taken never to remit at one time money enough to enable the exile to purchase a ticket for London. These Remittance settlers are picturesque features of the Territory; they toil not, neither do they spin, yet no cowboy, in all his glory, is arrayed like unto them. In London they were dandies, and wore the highest collars, and carried the biggest canes; in Alberta they wear the broadest-brimmed hats, the highest boots, and carry the most formidable-looking pistols.
[...] the creation between 1711 and 1718 of mining townships in the captaincy-general of São Paulo e Minas Gerais in Brazil. [...] the towns of Vila Rica, Vila do Carmo Sabará, São João del Rei, and São José del Rei were settlement nuclei [...].
Economic incentives to immigrate may be a function of undesirable conditions in the source country or they may be related to attractive conditions in the destination country.
The factories and colonies, which were planted [by Greeks] on the coasts and islands of the Aegean, and later on the coasts of the Black Sea and the Western Mediterranean, closely correspond in their economic and industrial character to the settlements of the Phoenicians. [...] the sources of their material prosperity were precisely similar to those on which the wealth of the Phoenician colonies was based. They were attracted by similar natural advantages in fixing on points for settlement, and the economic policy they pursued was not dissimilar.
The option of quick onward movement is an important advantage of 'golden passports' over 'golden visas', which habitually require longer residence and bring about less transnational mobility [...]. Long-term residence even requires [...] five years of continuous residence.
Harald I. (850–933), surnamed Haarfager [...] in 872, after a great victory at Hafrsfjord near Stavanger, [Harald] found himself king over the whole country. His realm was, however, threatened by dangers from without, as large numbers of his opponents had taken refuge, not only in Iceland, then recently discovered, but also in the Orkneys, Shetlands, Hebrides and Faeroes, and in Scotland itself [...].
Helgi Þorláksson suggested that Sturla must have had political biases as a participant in the power struggles of the thirteenth century, and that he appears to have been an opponent of increased royal control in Iceland. Moreover, Sturla's redaction of Landnámabók explicitly describes the settlers who fled Harald Fairhair's oppression and subsequently settled in Iceland.
There is a simplified notion that nomads spontaneously migrate to places where there is good pasture. However [...] determining ecological factors are climactic conditions, the distribution of forage plants, the distribution of salty soils and the supply of water.
[...] the Austronesian migration pattern in which the migrant daughter communities would have always maintained relationships with the parent communities in the homeland.
The Austronesians were a maritime people and their population expanded, island hopping around the South China Sea and the edge of the Pacific Ocean.
Between 1634 and 1673, 800 King's Daughters (Filles du roy) were recruited by religious communities and agents of the One Hundred Associates to provide wives for the men and to increase the population and to stabilize the colony. By 1663 there were 6 bachelors for each girl who had reached puberty.
[...] there is at least now a consensus that four major movements of migration involved really large military forces, namely the movements of Goths from 376, the invasion of Italy by Radagausius, the crossing of the Rhine in 406 and Theodoric's invasion of Italy. Also, there is every reason to suppose (as the sources report) that many women and children will have been caught up in these movements [...].
What misery the Huns inflicted on the other barbarians along the empire's edge was of little consequence , other than being the principal cause of the massed barbarian migrations of 407.
The Huns [...] indirectly caused the final crash [of the Roman Empire] [...]. But the Huns began by supplying only a first motive power [...]. [...] The Visigoths, hard pressed by the Ostrogoths and Huns, had already, since about 300, been working their way over the Danube. [...] From here began the great movement, which was to be the pioneer of all movements of the Teuton hordes.
A perfect climatological storm hit [...] in the third century. Firstly, starting in around AD 200 precipitation levels in northern Europe fell, joined by a drop in temperature after AD 250, triggering barbarian migrations southward. Secondly, solar activity downturned notably in the mid third century impacting agriculture in all Eurasia [...]. [...] Agricultural downturn in an ancient agrarian society causes starvation, inevitably closely followed by disease and social friction.
The changing climatological condition leading to drought conditions on the steppes has also been brought up as a possibility. [...] the environment seems to be one of the major factors that underlie the Hunnic migration/incursion in the fourth century.
[...] in the northern nomadic regions of the Huns during the Han dynasty, serious natural disasters occurred several times [...] droughts, snowstorms, locust plagues, epidemics, and other natural disasters are also major enemies of the survival of nomadic peoples. When these serious natural disasters strike, nomadic peoples may consider migrating out of disaster-prone areas as a last resort.
How did the Western settler travel to his new home? No wagon could cross the mountains in those early days, so they were obliged to go on foot or on horseback [...]. Some pushed small hand-carts before them, laden with their goods. [...] Several families with wagons went in a group [...]. Sometimes bands of movers with long pack-trains of horses filed along the valleys [...]. [...] The single traveller in search of a location to which he would later bring his family might go down the river in a canoe or in a pirogue [...].
Samoan navigators were also voyaging westwards and north-westwards [...], discovering and settling in islands as far apart as Nukuoro and Kapingamarangi in Micronesia, and Sikaiana and Luangiua near the Solomons [...] voyagers from Tahiti, Marquesas and the Cook Islands sailed north, east and southwest. Some reached Aotearoa New Zealand at different times between A.D. 500 and 1200, discovering and settling in a land that was truly terra nullius (a land without humans).
Iceland and Greenland were to all intents and purposes terra nullius ('no one's land') for their Scandinavian settlers. What were presumably a small number of Irish hermits are said in Íslendingabók to have vacated Iceland without a struggle upon the arrival of the Norsemen [...] There is no indication before the middle of the twelfth century of the active presence of the natives of Greenland in either of the two Norse ssettlements [...].
The French [...], having lost Canada, were looking abroad for fresh lands to conquer and to colonize, and hoped to find them in the Southern Seas; and Bougainville, their greatest explorer, undertook to plant a colony in the Falkland Islands. The settlers, including some Acadian families, landed early in 1764, and established themselves at Port Louis at the head of Berkeley Sound on the eastern side of East Falkland.
Pitcairn had changed beyond the imaginings of the original settlers who were isolated for years and who were entirely dependent on their own resources. Pitcairn's economy ceased to be self-sufficient from the 1830s onwards.
Hopelessly outnumbered and inadequately armed, too far from home for the secure establishment of supply lines, the Norsemen ultimately abandoned their settlements and fled the marauding skraelings [...].
{{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)[...] plans for settlement and resettlement became increasingly radical – a tendency that culminated between the summer of 1941 and late 1942 with the drafting of the Generalplan Ost (General Plan for the East) and a Generalsiedlungsplan (General Plan for Settlement) for large parts of Poland and portions of the Soviet Union. The Generalsiedlungsplan also encompassed Slovenia, Bohemia and Moravia, Alsace, Lorraine, and Luxembourg. [...] In what was the most extensive of all known Nazi settlement plans, the Arbeitswissenschaftliches Institut (the Institute for Labor Science of the German Labor Front) anticipated that 100 million Germans would be needed to settle the East over the next hundred years.
[...] Dutch traders were confined to the tiny walled settlement of Dejima, an artificial island in Nagasaki Bay. Their activities were strictly controlled and their movements closely watched. All communication was through official Japanese interpreters, who ensured that foreign ideas did not slip in among the Dutch imports [...].
In each foreign country the Hanseatics had always their permanent settlement, known as the Kontor, and for these they had early obtained a species of autonomy that permitted them to exercise jurisdiction according to their native laws over their own country. [...] The shrewd towns knew well how to estimate the value of such foreign settlements [...].
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)[...] several kinds of contact were cultivated by the Hanse kontor and its merchants in Bergen. [...] Firstly, there are the kontor's contacts, mainly of a political nature. Secondly, much of the contact made by individual merchants was maintained within the legal framework established by the kontor's rules and articles, most important being the business contacts of this group. Thirdly, the merchants established contacts privately, which were contrary to the statutes or were morally dubious.
Prior to the invasions of the late fourth century, Germanic tribes had already been living within the [Roman] empire. It was a common Roman policy to resettle defeated enemies from outside the empire within a province. Since the first century BC, the Roman army had also taken in foreign auxiliaries. By the third and fourth centuries, Germanic auxiliaries had assumed a significant role in the imperial defence. [...] In itself, this was nothing new [...]. The assimilation of foreign tribes and peoples into the empire – and the rise of their elites to the very top of the Roman bureaucratic and military structure had been the essence of empire for several centuries. Meanwhile, many Germanic tribes, some allies of the Romans, many not, remained outside its borders.
In AD 449 Vortigern invited German warriors under the command of two brothers: Hengist and Horsa. [...] These two chieftains became very powerful and soon were inviting more of their people to come and settle in the new land. [...] Vortigern again became the ruler and invited tribes of the Germani once more to Britain.
According to this legend, even before Rurik, the Varangians somehow settled among the Novgorodians and their neighboring Slavic and Finnish tribes [...] and took tribute from them. Then the tributaries refused to pay it and drove the Varangians back overseas. Left without the alien rulers, the natives quarreled among themselves [...] [then] sent ambassadors overseas to their acquaintances with the Varangians, to Rus', inviting those who wished to come to own the vast and abundant [...] land.
[...] the networks of local groups that had everywhere formed the political backbone of European rule overseas – the native aristocracies, the ethnic minorities, the settler interests, the comprador merchants, the local évolués [...].
Caste is not an indigenous problem but it came to India along with foreign invaders [...] the caste sytem, which entered the Indian subsontinent through the foreign invaders, resulted in the division of the entire society into thousands of castes and formation of graded inequality.
The foreign invaders who came to India like Shakas, Greeks, Chinese and Huns did not try to dismantle the Hindu caste system. These foreign invaders were inducted into either Kshatriya or Shudra caste as its members. They wholeheartedly accepted the Brahminical religious order and got assimilated into Indian society. [...] Even the foreigners who settled in India acknowledged and assimilated some kind of caste system into their fold.
In the 1790s the ruling elite, who were mainly descendants of Protestant English and German colonists, called themselves 'New Aryans.' Later, they adopted the 'WASP' self-identification. 'WASP' subsequently gave way to 'American,' [...]. [...] Consequently, those white descendants of immigrants who chose to assimilate into WASP culture likewise adopted the self-identification 'American.' This process of massive cultural assimilation of non-WASP whites has left African Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans, and Latino Americans as unassimilatable.
Hut tax did compel Africans to participate in a cash economy, even if only at a low level, because the tax could be paid only in cash.
At first Yakuts could not understand the Russians' hunger for pelts. When the first promyshlenniki offered copper kettles, the Yakuts filled each one to the brim with sable furs as payment; they seem to have thought the Russians dupes. Yet communities that accepted the czar's protection soon felt the yasak's sting. Official fur quotas demanded usually one sable pelt a year from every able-bodied male over fifteen. Then the more ruthless promyshlenniki and corrupt governors, that is to say all of the governors who have endured in the historical record, augmented official tribute with personal levies. Refusal to pay yasak brought awful retribution.
'The day Columbus set foot in the Caribbean was a sad day for indigenous people. Millions were wiped out ... their civilisation was destroyed.'
From 1804 to 1830, the Tasmanian aborigines were harassed and killed with a haphazard but predictable ruthlessness that makes their extinction both unmysterious and unspecial in the history of genocides.
Indentured servitude appeared in Virginia by 1620. Initially a device used to transport European workers to the New World, over time servitude dwindled as black slavery grew in importance in the British colonies.
In 1878, negotiations were made with the Indian government for people to come to work in Fiji. The contracts were for five years, after which the labourers, or girmitiyas , were free to return to India at their own expense. If they stayed for anothed five years the return passage would be paid.
Each [settlement] had a so-called 'overseer' and a detachment of Cossacks and operated according to martial rules. The exile-settlers were predominantly male, but the regime rounded up as many female convicts as it could and distributed them as a reward for good behavior. [...] Between 1829 and 1840, St. Petersburg exiled a total of 31,264 men and women to Eniseisk Province.
[...] the period of the Dutch East India Company (VOC) rule in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries [...] was the heyday of the slave system, associated with the evolution of a distinct settler society and economy.
With the 'technology' of gang labor, sugar could be produced at a very low cost on large slave plantations. Brazilian planters tapped the readily available supply made possible by a world market in slaves. In the country's first 250 years, roughly 70 percent of the immigrants to this Portuguese colony arrived in chains.
Marcelo Caliu runs one of the modern multi-use ranches opened up in the rain forest [...].
During the 16th century Spain and Portugal used the new sea routes to import precious metals, which were acquired from the colonies through the exploitation of the newly discovered deposits by slave labor, and the main commodities of the medieval long-haul trade, such as pepper and other spices.
Earlier prestige gifts present at native inland sites consist of Rhodian bronzes, perhaps carried by an overland route through the Alps from Italy; Athenian pottery is not present. Suddenly in the second half of the 6th century wares from Attica appear in the interior. It seems that Athenian ceramics were passing through Massilia, then being transported upriver to sites in the hinterland.
As applied in the Atlantic economy, mercantilism envisioned colonial dependence on the manufactures of the metropole and the channelling of the produce of American forests, farms, plantations, and fisheries back to the metropole. If this could be achieved, wrote the Englishman John Cary in 1695, the 'chief profit' of colonies ought to 'redound to the centre.' But the expectation of the state that trade could be confined to narrow channels in this highly competitive environment bordered on fantasy.
Between 1840 and 1852, the New Zealand Company was responsible for bringing 14,000 of the 18,000 settlers who came to New Zealand. [...] The company's objective was to build a 'better Britain' [...].