Shock collar

Last updated
A typical shock collar. Shock collar.jpg
A typical shock collar.
Shock collar used on a riot police dog in 2004 in Wurzburg. Two years later, Germany banned the use of shock collars, even by police. Diensthund.jpg
Shock collar used on a riot police dog in 2004 in Würzburg. Two years later, Germany banned the use of shock collars, even by police.

A shock collar, also known as an e-collar, Ecollar, or electronic collar, is a type of collar that delivers electrical current to the neck of its wearer (usually a dog), [3] [4] in an effort to control behaviour as a form of aversive training. These collars incorporate an electronic device that can either trigger automatically as in the case of bark control collars, or electronic fence systems, or may be triggered via a remote control. Many object to the user of shock collars as animal cruelty as they can cause discomfort, pain and fear, [5] [6] [7] [8] and several countries and regions and have banned their use. Some models offer additional features such as a tone or vibrational setting that can be used as an alternative or in combination with the shock, and may incorporate GPS functionality to track the collar's location.

Contents

Shock collars were initially developed for training hunting dogs in the 1960s, and were originally designed with only one high level of power. Many modern versions are capable of delivering varying levels of shock. In areas where shock collars are legal, they are generally accessible, although Petco took the lead as the first major U.S. retailer to cease their sale. [9] [10] Where permitted, shock collars have been used in a range of applications, including behavioral modification, obedience training, and pet containment, as well as military, police and service training.

Types

Invisible fences

Pet containment systems, or invisible fences, are designed to keep an animal within a boundary, [11] such that the wearer is shocked when they try to leave a boundary defined by a hidden wire, [12] or by a set of co-ordinates (in conjunction with a GPS receiver.) [13] [14]

These systems are illegal for use with pets in 14 countries [15] and discouraged under existing animal welfare laws in others, such as Scotland. [16]

Bark control shock collars

Bark control shock collars are used to curb excessive or nuisance barking by delivering a shock at the moment the dog begins barking. Bark collars can be activated by microphone or vibration, and some of the most advanced collars use both sound and vibration to eliminate the possibility of extraneous noises activating a response.[ citation needed ]

Remote shock collars

Remote shock collars can be activated by a handheld device to give the dog an electric shock which causes pain. [17] Remote shock collars can deliver variable shocks in variable duration and intensities, [18] and may additionally have a beep or vibration option for getting the dog's attention without the use of an electric shock.[ citation needed ]

Remote shock collars use operant conditioning either as a form of positive punishment, where the correction is applied at the moment an undesired behavior occurs to reduce the frequency of that behavior—or as a form of negative reinforcement, where a continuous stimulation is applied until the moment a desired behavior occurs, to increase the frequency of that behavior. [19]

Opinions about the amount of pain caused by shock collars

Pain is a difficult outcome to measure because its nature is both multifaceted and subjective, [20] [21] as a result, researchers disagree on how much pain a shock collar causes.

Dr Diane Frank, in the Australian Veterinary Journal, argues that shock collars for dogs inflict pain and distress. "Electric shock hurts and the same shock will be perceived differently by different dogs. Regardless, if the dog perceives pain, [it] experiences a stress response that actively interferes with learning positive, more favourable, substitute behaviour. If the shock and pain are profound, it is possible to induce almost immediate long-term potentiation (LTP), or the molecular changes associated with hippocampal memory, which will lead to a strong aversion or phobia." [22]

In contrast, Steven R. Lindsay, in the 2013 edition of his textbook on training and behavior, stated: "At low levels, the term shock is hardly fitting ... since there is virtually no effect beyond a pulsing tingling or tickling sensation on the surface of the skin ... the word shock is loaded with biased connotations, images of convulsive spasms and burns, and implications associated with extreme physical pain, emotional trauma, physiological collapse, and laboratory abuses ... the stimulus or signal generated by most modern devices is highly controlled and presented to produce a specific set of behavioral and motivational responses to it." [23] Lindsay does note that higher levels of shock from these collars do cause "fear" and "acute pain". [23]

In 2000, prior to Germany's ban on shock collars, Dr. Dieter Klein, in an article published in the German trade magazine "Office for Veterinary Service and Food Control", stated that shock collars for dogs cause minimal pain, comparing the impact of shock collars to other devices utilizing electrical stimulation. "Modern devices ... are in a range in which normally no organic damage is being inflicted. The electric properties and performances ... are comparable to the electric stimulation devices used in human medicine. Organic damage, as a direct impact of the applied current, can be excluded." [24]

Comparing pain levels: evaluating different amperages

The intensity of pain caused by electric current can vary significantly due to small changes in amperage. Furthermore, this pain can be further amplified by adjusting the pulse rate and duration. [25] Other factors such as voltage, current, waveform, and frequency of the waveform are not particularly relevant when it comes to assessing the level of pain. [26] While these factors can be used to calculate the amount of energy applied in Joules, they do not indicate the actual intensity of the stimulus or how it will be perceived by the recipient. [27]

In 2004, Dr. Dieter Klein conducted research and estimated that commercial shock collars, which were later banned in Germany, operated at a minimum setting of 30 milliamps and a maximum setting of 80 milliamps. [24] Another commonly-cited study, conducted by Christiansen et al., utilized shock collars with a higher intensity, reaching up to 400 milliamps. [28]

Depending on design, some shock collars can be set so that at the lowest level, the shock delivered is only mildly uncomfortable, and at the highest level produce acute pain. [23] Variable settings of this kind are essential, so that the shock collar can be adjusted to provide the level of pain that changes the dog's behavior, as situations change.

Shock collars are sometimes referred to as delivering a "static shock"; however, static electricity is simple direct current and carries little energy (order of millijoules). Shock collars do not use simple direct current because the effect is too unpredictable, [29] but rather, use pulsed direct current producing an effect resembling the square wave of alternating current. It is therefore inappropriate to refer to shock collars as delivering a static shock.

Consistent pain delivery requires good contact between the collar electrodes and the dog's shock skin. [30] (The shock collar must be fitted according to the manufacturer's instructions.) Local humidity and individual variation in coat density, skin thickness and surface conductivity, also affect the delivery of the pain. [31]

Individual variations in temperament, pain sensitivity and susceptibility to startle of dogs, means that settings must be carefully adjusted to produce pain [18] that is perceived by the dog as only just aversive enough to stop the dog engaging in the unwanted behavior. Normally salient stimuli, such as noises, commands and even shocks, may have no effect on a dog that is highly aroused and focused on an activity such as hunting. [31]

Note that a shock collar's individual shocks are short duration (6-8 milliseconds) [32] to cause pain but not physical injury, but the pain intensity can be increased by using the same milliamps for each shock but then delivering more shocks per second: "Many e−collars appear to shift intensity levels by altering the pulse duration or repetition rate while keeping the output current and voltage relatively constant, depending on the electrode−skin load." [12] The pain level can also be increased by delivering a continuous series of shocks (up to 30 seconds). [33]

Potential to cause physical harm

Pain experienced from shock collars is not from the electricity passing through the dog's body and reaching the ground (which would cause physical damage), but instead a result of electricity passing through a dog's body via closely-spaced electrodes (which should only cause pain). This pain is most clearly "described as physiological pain because it is not associated with any tissue damage" and even though such pain can "justifiably be described as a painful and emotionally distressing event, any potential harm would be psychological rather than physical", and therefore, burns are not likely to occur. [34]

Burns from shock collars are not unheard of, however. In 1980 (revised 1987), the US Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), a branch of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), concurred in regulatory action against a manufacturer of a bark collar, stating "Complaints received, which were later corroborated by our own testing, included severe burns in the collar area and possible personality adjustment injuries to the dogs. The shocking mechanism was found to be activated not only by barking but by vehicle horns, slamming doors or any other loud noise. CVM concurred in regulatory action against the device since it was deemed to be dangerous to the health of the animal." [35] The standing policy of the US FDA is that "Dog collars which are activated by the noise of barking to produce an electric shock are considered as hazardous to the health of the animal." [35]

Training effectiveness

When it comes to effectiveness, multiple studies have shown that shock collars are less effective than positive-reward-based training. [36] [37] [38] [39] [40]

Deterring predation in the wild

The Wildlife Society article addresses the use of shock collars as a way to prevent sheep from being preyed upon by wild coyotes. According to (Phillips, 1999) [41] they tested these collars on coyotes for a four-month period and found that the collars stopped thirteen attacks on sheep herds. This also is said to deter future attacks by the tested coyotes. Collars have also been used on wolves for similar reasons. This document is the assessment of the shock collar on wolves' long-term behavior. The article talks about trying to alter wolves' behavior over an extended period of time using the collar. The consensus was while it did have an effect while in use and temporally after it was removed, the study concluded that longer exposure would be needed to have any substantial evidence (Hawley, 2008).[ citation not found ] As far as non-lethal alternatives these two sources both concluded that shock collars are the most effective deterrence to predators. Both groups continued their research and the Wildlife Society has developed a new and improved version that eliminates the risk of neck injury when used on animals that previous versions caused. They have increased battery life and the durability of the unit. They devised a unit that is worn like a back pack for the animal. Previous versions caused excessive rubbing and soreness as well as being irritating for the animal to the point where they would try to take the harness off.

Criticism

Even in countries where shock collars are legal, their use is controversial. [42] [43]

The AVSAB (American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior) has strengthened their position statement on all aversive methods, including shock collars, which now states "The application of aversive methods – which, by definition, rely on application of force, pain, or emotional or physical discomfort – should not be used in canine training or for the treatment of behavioral disorders." [44]

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) opposes the use of shock collars, stating "Shock collars can cause dogs physical pain and injury (ranging from burns to cardiac fibrillation) and psychological stress, including severe anxiety and displaced aggression. Individual animals vary in their temperaments and pain thresholds; a shock that seems mild to one dog may be severe to another. The anxiety and confusion caused by repeated shocks can lead to changes in the heart and respiration rate or gastrointestinal disorders. Electronic collars can also malfunction, either administering nonstop shocks or delivering no shocks at all". [45]

On the advice of the RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) and other welfare groups, the ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) banned the use of shock collars for police dog training by all UK police forces. The current ACPO Police Dogs Manual of Guidance states "Equipment that is not approved for use in the training of police dogs includes remote training collars designed to give an electric shock and Pinch Collars". [46]

The RSPCA removed a policy statement discouraging the use of shock collars in 2018 due to a UK Government statement that they would be banned. [47] In June 2023 the Animal Welfare (Electronic Collars) (England) Regulations 2023 were approved by the Lords but a delay in implementation leading to the BVNA [48] alongside other charities such as the RSPCA [49] launching a campaign to support the proposed ban.

The UK Kennel Club welcomed [50] the proposed legislation to achieve a ban on the sale and use of shock collars in England. Their campaign had stated that "The Kennel Club is against the use of any negative training methods or devices. The Kennel Club believes that there are many positive training tools and methods that can produce dogs that are trained just as quickly and reliably, with absolutely no fear, pain, or potential damage to the relationship between dog and handler." "The Kennel Club in calling upon the Government and Scottish Parliament to introduce an outright ban on this barbaric method of training dogs.". [51]

The two British members of the World Union of German Shepherd Clubs (WUSV) helped the Kennel Club win a complete ban on shock collars. They passed a motion to exclude this equipment from any of its training branches during official club training times. [52]

Availability by region

Shock collars are banned in:

They will be banned in Flanders in Belgium after 2027. [79] [80] [81] Automatic anti-barking shock collars are banned in Switzerland. [82] [83] Legislation to ban e-collars in England has been drafted, but as of October 2025 its passage into law is indefinitely delayed. [84]

In 2001, British magistrates found that the aggressive behaviors of three dogs were due to the effects of shock collars. The initial incident occurred when the dogs, startled by a small dog, caused their owner to jump, inadvertently triggering the shock collars. This led to the dogs associating small dogs with receiving shocks, resulting in fear and aggression towards them. Over time, this escalated, leading to the dogs attacking and killing a small dog. [85]

In 2002, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) in Victoria, Australia lost a defamation lawsuit to a shock collar manufacturer and was ordered to pay AUD100,000 in damages. The RSPCA was found to have falsely claimed that shock collars can cause burns, deliver 3,000 volt shocks to dogs, and that the current from a shock collar had caused a 60 kilogram dog to perform backflips and resulted in brain damage. RSPCA's claims that these collars caused epileptic fits, vomiting, seizures, burning and bleeding was also found to be misleading. [86] The RSPCA's senior inspector had falsified evidence in an attempt to demonstrate that shock collars can cause burns. [87]

In 2010, the High Court in Wales upheld a ban on the use of shock collars for cats and dogs. It was unsuccessfully challenged by Petsafe, a manufacturer of these devices, and the Electronic Collar Manufacturers' Association. The court upheld the law and ruled that it did not breach Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights (concerning the right to property). [88]

In 2011, a Welsh man became the first person convicted of illegal use of a shock collar in Wales, [89] receiving a fine for £2,000. [90]

In 2022, a class action suit was filed in California for "a variety of brands" falsely marketing shock collars as "safe" and "harmless" tools, as well as "conceal(ing) the true nature of the Shock Collar Products" by using "neutral euphemisms to describe what being electrocuted by a shock collar feels like for a pet. [91] Among the most popular terms that it uses to falsely describe a painful electric shock are 'static correction,' 'surprise,' 'tickle,' and 'stimulation.' [91] The case was settled on February 5, 2025. [92]

See also

References

  1. ↑ https://sfstandard.com/community/san-francisco-first-city-ban-dog-shock-collars-static-correction/# "San Francisco May Be First City in the Nation to Ban Shock Collars". San Francisco Standard. January 16, 2023.
  2. 1 2 "Germany - Cruelty - German Animal Welfare Act | Animal Legal & Historical Center". www.animallaw.info.
  3. ↑ Wensley, Sean (2 February 2016). "Vets call for ban on electric 'shock collars'". The Veterinary Nurse. 7 (1): 56. doi:10.12968/vetn.2016.7.1.56.
  4. ↑ "Shock collar | Research Starters | EBSCO Research". EBSCO. Retrieved 2025-09-25.
  5. ↑ Seligman, Martin E. (September 1970). "On the generality of the laws of learning". Psychological Review . 77 (5): 406–418. doi:10.1037/h0029790. S2CID   145661354. ProQuest   614281984.
  6. ↑ Mowrer, O. H. (November 1939). "A stimulus-response analysis of anxiety and its role as a reinforcing agent". Psychological Review . 46 (6): 553–565. doi:10.1037/h0054288. ProQuest   614288080.
  7. ↑ Miller, Neal E. (April 1948). "Theory and experiment relating psychoanalytic displacement to stimulus-response generalization". The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology . 43 (2): 155–178. doi:10.1037/h0056728. PMID   18861377. ProQuest   614244452.
  8. ↑ Dunsmoor, Joseph E.; Murty, Vishnu P.; Davachi, Lila; Phelps, Elizabeth A. (April 2015). "Emotional learning selectively and retroactively strengthens memories for related events". Nature . 520 (7547): 345–348. Bibcode:2015Natur.520..345D. doi:10.1038/nature14106. PMC   4432479 . PMID   25607357.
  9. ↑ Wallace, Alicia (6 October 2020). "Petco will stop selling electronic 'shock' collars". CNN . Retrieved 2023-06-02.
  10. ↑ Tyco, Kelly. "Petco ends sale of electronic shock collars, calls on competitors to also 'Stop the Shock' with online petition". USA Today . Retrieved 2023-06-02.
  11. ↑ "Electric shock collars: Ministers reject invisible fences plea". BBC News. 2013-04-10. Retrieved 2025-10-01.
  12. 1 2 Lindsay 2005, p. 573.
  13. ↑ "GPS cow collars create 'virtual fence' at Peasedown St John farm". www.bbc.com. 2025-08-08. Retrieved 2025-10-01.
  14. ↑ Blackwell, Emily J; Bolster, Christine; Richards, Gemma; Loftus, Bethany A; Casey, Rachel A (December 2012). "The use of electronic collars for training domestic dogs: estimated prevalence, reasons and risk factors for use, and owner perceived success as compared to other training methods". BMC Veterinary Research. 8 (1): 93. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-93 . PMC   3474565 . PMID   22748195.
  15. ↑ Ruiz, Marlene (2025-08-18). "🌍 Tracking Legislation Worldwide". International Association of Canine Professionals. Retrieved 2025-09-25.
  16. ↑ Scottish Government (October 2018). "Guidance on Dog Training Aids" (PDF). Scottish Government. Retrieved 24 September 2025. Particular training devices that the Scottish Government does not condone are: electronic shock (static pulse) collars, electronic anti-bark collars, electronic containment systems, or any other method to inflict physical punishment or negative reinforcement
  17. ↑ Polsky, Richard H. (1994). "Electronic shock collars: are they worth the risks?". Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association. 30 (5): 463–468.
  18. 1 2 Schalke, E.; Stichnoth, J.; Ott, S.; Jones-Baade, R. (July 2007). "Clinical signs caused by the use of electric training collars on dogs in everyday life situations". Applied Animal Behaviour Science . 105 (4): 369–380. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.11.002. S2CID   31552322.
  19. ↑ Guilherme Fernandes, Joana; Olsson, I. Anna S.; Vieira de Castro, Ana Catarina (November 2017). "Do aversive-based training methods actually compromise dog welfare?: A literature review". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 196: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2017.07.001. hdl: 10216/112687 .
  20. ↑ Younger, Jarred; McCue, Rebecca; Mackey, Sean (February 2009). "Pain outcomes: A brief review of instruments and techniques". Current Pain and Headache Reports. 13 (1): 39–43. doi:10.1007/s11916-009-0009-x. PMC   2891384 . PMID   19126370.
  21. ↑ Frampton, C.L.; Hughes-Webb, P. (August 2011). "The Measurement of Pain". Clinical Oncology. 23 (6): 381–386. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2011.04.008. PMID   21571514.
  22. ↑ Frank, Dr Diane (June 1999). "Electronic collars 'hurt'". Australian Veterinary Journal. 77 (6): 408–409. doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1999.tb10326.x.
  23. 1 2 3 Lindsay 2000, p. [ page needed ].
  24. 1 2 Klein, Dieter R., 2000, "How Dangerous are Remote Stimulation Devices for the Training of Dogs?" Amtstierärztlicher Dienst und Lebensmittelkontrolle[ full citation needed ]
  25. ↑ https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/2019-04/Basic_Electricity_Materials.pdf Train-the-Trainer: Basic Electricity Safety This material was produced under a Susan Harwood Training Grant #SH-24896-SH3 from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  26. ↑ "Amperage, Not Voltage, Poses the Greatest Danger With Electrical Shock". The Spruce. Retrieved 2025-09-23.
  27. ↑ Fish, Raymond M.; Geddes, Leslie A. (2009-10-12). "Conduction of electrical current to and through the human body: a review". ePlasty. 9: e44. ISSN   1937-5719. PMC   2763825 . PMID   19907637.
  28. ↑ Christiansen, Frank O; Bakken, Morten; Braastad, Bjarne O (April 2001). "Behavioural changes and aversive conditioning in hunting dogs by the second-year confrontation with domestic sheep". Applied Animal Behaviour Science . 72 (2): 131–143. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00203-3. PMID   11278032.
  29. ↑ Masterson, Fred A., and Campbell, Byron BYRON. "Techniques of electric shock motivation." Methods in psychobiology. Academic Press, 1972. 21-58.
  30. ↑ Polsky, Richard H (1994). "Electronic shock collars: are they worth the risks?". Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association. 30 (5): 463–468.
  31. 1 2 "The negative effects of the electronic collar on the welfare of dogs and positive training methods as alternatives". Utrecht University. 14 December 2020. Translated from: Kapteijn, C.M.; van der Borg, J.A.M.; Vinke, C.M.; Arndt, S.S. (2020). "Schokken of brokken? De negatieve effecten van de elektronische halsband op het welzijn van honden en positieve trainingsmethoden als alternatief" [Shocks or lumps? The negative effects of the electronic collar on dog welfare and positive training methods as an alternative]. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde (in Dutch). 145 (8): 16–19.
  32. ↑ US6459378B2,Gerig, Duane A.,"Animal shock collar with low impedance transformer",issued 2002-10-01
  33. ↑ Schilder, Matthijs B.H; van der Borg, Joanne A.M (March 2004). "Training dogs with help of the shock collar: short and long term behavioural effects". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 85 (3–4): 319–334. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2003.10.004. S2CID   26374104.
  34. ↑ Electronic RT in Perspective - David Chamberlain BVetMed., MRCVS.
  35. 1 2 FDA (20 February 2020). "FDA Compliance enforcement". Food and Drug Administration .[ dead link ]
  36. ↑ Masson, Sylvia; de la Vega, Silvia; Gazzano, Angelo; Mariti, Chiara; Pereira, Gonçalo Da Graça; Halsberghe, Christine; Muser Leyvraz, Anneli; McPeake, Kevin; Schoening, Barbara (May 2018). "Electronic training devices: Discussion on the pros and cons of their use in dogs as a basis for the position statement of the European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology". Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 25: 71–75. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2018.02.006. hdl: 20.500.11820/23d9352e-fd84-4910-b301-f45044a22204 . S2CID   148769178.
  37. ↑ Berry, Alistair; Lincoln, University of. "Electronic collars less effective than reward-based training, research finds". phys.org. Retrieved 2023-04-21.
  38. ↑ Overall, Karen L. (January 2007). "Why electric shock is not behavior modification". Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2006.12.006.
  39. ↑ Ziv, Gal (May 2017). "The effects of using aversive training methods in dogs—A review". Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 19: 50–60. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2017.02.004. S2CID   151846599.
  40. ↑ China, Lucy; Mills, Daniel S.; Cooper, Jonathan J. (22 July 2020). "Efficacy of Dog Training With and Without Remote Electronic Collars vs. a Focus on Positive Reinforcement". Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7 508. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00508 . PMC   7387681 . PMID   32793652.
  41. ↑ Andelt, William F.; Phillips, Robert L.; Gruver, Kenneth S.; Guthrie, Jerry W. (1999). "Coyote Predation on Domestic Sheep Deterred with Electronic Dog-Training Collar". Wildlife Society Bulletin. 27 (1): 12–18. JSTOR   3783933.
  42. ↑ "Ban on electric shock collars for pets". BBC News. 2018-08-27. Retrieved 2023-06-02.
  43. ↑ "'No more effective than training': Brussels to ban controversial dog collars". The Brussels Times . Retrieved 2023-06-02.
  44. ↑ https://avsab.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/AVSAB-Humane-Dog-Training-Position-Statement-2021.pdf AVSAB Humane Dog Training Position Statement
  45. ↑ PETA (10 August 2010). "Electric Fences and Shock Collars".
  46. ↑ "ACPO Police Dogs Manual of Guidance" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-02.
  47. ↑ "Cruel electric shock collars for pets to be banned". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2023-10-19.
  48. ↑ Association, British Veterinary. "BVA policy - Electric shock collars and training aids". British Veterinary Association. Retrieved 2023-10-19.
  49. ↑ "Ban the use of shock collars | Campaigns | RSPCA". www.rspca.org.uk. Retrieved 2023-10-19.
  50. ↑ "'Cruel' electric shock collars banned in England | Kennel Club". www.thekennelclub.org.uk. Retrieved 2023-06-02.
  51. ↑ Kennel Club. "Kennel Club Campaign".
  52. ↑ WUSV. "WUSV Ban". Archived from the original on 2012-03-25.
  53. ↑ "Dog Keeping Laws for Germany".
  54. ↑ https://www.connexionfrance.com/article/French-news/France-bans-training-dog-collars-that-cause-pain-to-animals# The Connexion. France bans training dog collars that cause pain to animals. 18 January 2023.
  55. ↑ "Souffrance animale: l'Assemblée vote l'interdiction des "colliers de dressage"". Le Point (in French). 2023-12-13. Retrieved 2023-11-19.
  56. ↑ "Animal Protection Law in Spain gets the green light after months of delays". Spanish News Today. 16 February 2022.
  57. ↑ https://www.publico.es/sociedad/gobierno-aprobara-proximo-viernes-ley-proteccion-animal.html Publico. El Gobierno aprobará este próximo viernes la Ley de Protección Animal. 15 March 2022.
  58. ↑ https://el-lorquino.com/2022/02/16/espana/espana-aprobara-el-viernes-la-ley-de-proteccion-animal/134443/ El Lorquino. Spain will approve the Animal Protection Law on Friday. 16 February 2022.
  59. ↑ "Elektronische halsband voor honden vanaf volgend jaar verboden". 4 April 2019.
  60. 1 2 "Netherlands to ban shock collars for dogs, limit breeding of 'designer cats'". 4 April 2019.
  61. ↑ "Achtung vor verbotenen Halsbändern für Hunde" [Beware of prohibited collars for dogs]. Heute.at (in German). 13 September 2021.
  62. ↑ "Fynsk dyrlæge forarget over salg af stødhalsbånd: Hundene ved ikke, hvad der rammer dem". TV2 Fyn (in Danish). 23 May 2019. Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  63. ↑ Masson, Sylvia; Nigron, Isabelle; Gaultier, Emmanuel (July 2018). "Questionnaire survey on the use of different e-collar types in France in everyday life with a view to providing recommendations for possible future regulations". Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 26: 48–60. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2018.05.004. S2CID   150078403.
  64. ↑ "Animal Welfare Decree" (PDF). Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
  65. ↑ "Eläinsuojelulaki | 247/1996 | Lainsäädäntö | Finlex". www.finlex.fi.
  66. ↑ "Notkun rafmagnsólarinnar tilkynnt sem ill meðferð til MAST". Mannlíf.is (in Icelandic). 2019-01-17. Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  67. ↑ "Rafmagnsólar hunda bannaðar - Vísir". visir.is (in Icelandic). 15 July 2011. Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  68. ↑ Lindin, Ina-Kristin (2017-01-27). "Dømt for bruk av strømhalsbånd". NRK (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  69. ↑ Government of Norway. (2009). Animal Welfare Act. General Treatment of Animals (§ 3), Use of Equipment and Technical Solutions (§ 8), and Prohibitions in Training (§ 26.3). Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/animal-welfare-act/id571188/.
  70. ↑ Gernes, Jonatan (2021-05-20). "Elhalsband gav plågsamma skador på hunden". hallandsposten.se (in Swedish). Archived from the original on 2024-04-29. Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  71. ↑ Todd, Zazie (May 2018). "Barriers to the adoption of humane dog training methods". Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 25: 28–34. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2018.03.004. S2CID   149309452.
  72. ↑ "Electric Shock Collars". Kennel Club UK.
  73. ↑ "Electric shock collars banned in Wales". Wales Online . WalesOnline. 23 March 2010. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  74. ↑ Shields, Billy (July 7, 2014). "Quebec takes steps to protect pets from shock collars, prongs - Montreal". Global News. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
  75. ↑ "Répondre aux besoins d'un animal". Gouvernement du Québec. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
  76. ↑ Stroman, Reta (2023-08-26). "12 Countries Where Shock Collars Are Banned And Illegal - FunniPaw" . Retrieved 2023-10-12.
  77. ↑ Total Slovenia News. (2021). Slovenia Tightens Rules on Pet Care. Retrieved from https://www.total-slovenia-news.com/lifestyle/8923-slovenia-tightens-rules-on-pet-care."
  78. ↑ "Is the use of electronic dog collars legal?". RSPCA Australia.
  79. ↑ "Flanders to ban shock collars for pets". 11 August 2021.
  80. ↑ "Uitdoofscenario voor stroomhalsbanden, verbod vanaf 2027". March 2024.
  81. ↑ "Stroomhalsbanden voor honden verboden vanaf 2027". 10 August 2021.
  82. ↑ "Great News For Dogs As Switzerland Passes Law To Ban Cruel Anti-Barking Devices". Holidog Times EN. 2018-02-13. Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  83. ↑ "Ordonnances du domaine vétérinaire: modifications". www.admin.ch. Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  84. ↑ Carter, E (November 2007). "Welfare of Farmed Animals (England) Regulations 2007". Animal Welfare. 16 (4): 524–524. doi:10.1017/s0962728600027470. ISSN   0962-7286.
  85. ↑ "Dogfight nets RSPCA chief $30,000". The Age. 6 July 2002. Retrieved 27 July 2018.
  86. ↑ "Orion Pet Products Pty Ltd v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Vic)". Federal Court of Australia. Retrieved 27 July 2018.
  87. ↑ Catriona Murdoch (23 November 2010). "Electric shock pet collar ban did not breach human rights". UK Human Rights Blog.
  88. ↑ "Shock collar found on pet dog roaming on Vale beach". BBC News. April 18, 2011.
  89. ↑ "Ogmore illegal shock collar dog owner gets £2,000 fine". BBC News. July 18, 2011.
  90. 1 2 Hernandez v. Radio Systems Corporation( United States District Court for the Central District of California October 21, 2022), Text .
  91. ↑ Hernandez v. Radio Systems Corporation( United States District Court for the Central District of California February 5, 2025), Text .

Sources

External references

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.