Slum clearance in the United Kingdom

Last updated
Boundary Street in London, part of the Old Nichol slum Boundary Street 1890.jpg
Boundary Street in London, part of the Old Nichol slum

Slum clearance in the United Kingdom has been used as an urban renewal strategy to transform low-income settlements with poor reputation into another type of development or housing. Early mass clearances took place in the country's northern cities. Starting from 1930, councils were expected to prepare plans to clear slum dwellings, although progress stalled upon the onset of World War II.

Contents

Clearance of slum areas resumed and increased after the war, while the 1960s saw the largest number of house renewal schemes pursued by local authorities, particularly in Manchester where it was reported around 27% 'may' have been unfit for human habitation, although the majority were well built solid structures that could have been renovated or repurposed. Housing, churches, schools and pubs that formed close-knit communities were devastated, with families dispersed across other areas. Towards the end of the decade, a housing act in 1969 provided financial encouragement for authorities and landlords to improve existing housing stock and extend the life of many older properties. By 1985, England and Wales had seen over 1.5 million houses declared unfit or demolished over a 30-year period, displacing over 3.6 million people.

The Labour government in 2002 launched the Housing Market Renewal Initiative scheme, with the primary objective to demolish housing considered undesirable and replace with new developments. Also known as the Pathfinder programme, the scheme ended in 2011, due to the Conservative austerity program.

Background

From the late 19th century up to the 1970s, clearance of slum housing was seen as an expensive undertaking with numerous problems, although generally considered a necessity to achieve a higher standard of living. [1] In the years following World War II, areas affected by slum clearance were usually replaced by social housing, while many of the newer houses had priority allocation given to those who had lost their previous home through demolition. [2] Throughout Britain and other developed countries, historical housing literature suggests that slum clearance and housing renewal policies have had the opposite effect on the poorest people, whom they aimed to support, from that intended: new housing built to replace demolished slum dwellings was often too costly to rent for poorer families, who had lost their homes to make way for newer developments; these typically became occupied instead by the upper working class. [3]

In the period following the 1970s, opinions started to change towards the view that clearance was less than effective and too costly, both fiscally and in terms of the break-up of communities. [1] Demolition programmes throughout the 20th century were successful in removing the worst of the country's housing stock and helped improve the quality of homes available for the poor and working class. [4] Generally, no account of the incident[ clarification needed ] or impact of housing clearance was taken before the 2000s. [1]

Early 20th century

John Grantham, Sheriff of Newcastle, surveying slum clearance areas during a visit by the Minister of Health, 16 October 1925 Visiting Newcastle's slums (28580983285).jpg
John Grantham, Sheriff of Newcastle, surveying slum clearance areas during a visit by the Minister of Health, 16 October 1925

Between 1895 and 1918, Liverpool engaged in wide-scale slum clearances, and constructed more homes than any authority outside of London. New housing was intended for tenants displaced by demolition of their old home, although not everyone displaced was re-homed, and only those who could pay the rent were offered a new home. [5] In Leeds, where many slum clearances were of back-to-back houses, the land they occupied was very small and usually incapable of supporting any new profitable developments; this impacted upon site-value compensation. [6]

While new council housing had been built, little had been done to resolve the problem of inner-city slums. Clearance strategies were used predominantly during the early 20th century for redeveloping urban communities, such as in relation to the Housing Act 1930 (also known as the Greenwood Act), which required councils to prepare slum clearance plans, and some progress was made before the start of the World War II. [7] [8] Up to February 1932, 394 clearance areas were declared in England and Wales, affecting 64,000 people. [9] Estimates in 1933 by local authorities in Scotland suggested that nearly 62,000 new homes needed to be built to replace demolished slum housing, of which around 90% were expected to be built within a five-year period. Secretary of State for Scotland Godfrey Collins believed that one could visualise the end of Scottish slums by the end of 1938. [10]

Toward the end of 1936 throughout the United Kingdom, around 25,000 people living in slum housing were being rehoused each month, which had totalled around 450,000 by August 1936. [11] Upon the outbreak of World War II, there were around 1,300 proposed slum clearance orders, of which 103 had been confirmed by January 1940, [12] but virtually no slum housing was cleared during the 15 years following the outbreak of war. [13]

Mid-20th century

The drive to clear slum houses resumed in 1955, particularly in Manchester where 68,000 were deemed to be unfit. [14] By 1957, slum clearances were well under way according to Henry Brooke, the Minister of Housing and Local Government, who stated that houses condemned or demolished had gone up from 20,000 in 1954 to 35,000 by 1956, while rehousing over 200,000 people during the mid-1950s. [15] In 1960, 50 local authority clearance figures suggested long-term problems in addressing slums. Through the period 1955–1960, of the estimated 416,706 dwellings deemed unfit, only 62,372 had been cleared by 1960. The authority with the highest number of unfit homes was Liverpool with around 88,000, closely followed by Manchester. [16] By March 1963, Liverpool had only cleared around 10% of the houses deemed unfit in 1955 and was one of 38 local authorities classed as having clearance problems requiring special attention. [17] From 1964 to 1969, 385,270 houses in England were demolished or condemned during slum-clearance schemes. [18] Slum clearance accelerated during the 1960s: 10,000 more slum houses were demolished during 1968 than in 1963. [19]

Houses unfit in 1955 (blue) and demolished by March 1963 (orange) [17]
Regions with over 10,000 houses deemed unfit in 1955

In a speech in the House of Commons in 1965, Alf Morris noted that 20% of the country's poorest dwellings were in the North West region. In Manchester, many dwellings were considered uninhabitable, with an estimated 54,700 dwellings, representing 27.1% of the total, being unfit for habitation. Around three-quarters of the region's poorest residences were located in a belt of land dominated by Manchester and Liverpool. The decline of the region was noted in comparison to comments made by antiquary John Leland, who in 1538 described the town of Manchester as "the fairest, best builded" town he had seen. Morris considered that Manchester had shown "more vigour courage and compassion" than other cities in tackling the slum housing problem, with 4,000 houses demolished both in 1963 and in 1964, in line with set targets. When comparing slum clearances undertaken by Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham, Liverpool, Sheffield and Bristol, figures suggested that for the five years ending June 1965, Manchester was ahead of the other cities in the number of houses either demolished or compulsory purchased with a view to demolition. [20]

Towards the end of the 1960s, slum clearances and the consequent destruction of communities were causing concerns for the government. [21] The Housing Act 1969 was introduced to help authorities overcome problems with slum clearances by introducing the concept of general improvement areas, where improvement grants were available. It was estimated in 1970 that around 5 million people lived in condemned houses. [18]

The criteria to determine the type of house that could be defined as a slum were amended in the 1969 housing act, typically being applied to houses unfit for habitation and those beyond reasonable repair cost. [22] In some cases, a slum clearance area could be declared without swift action, such as in South Kilburn where 342 unfit houses were identified in 1965 yet only 22 had been demolished by 1970, with local MP Laurence Pavitt commenting that the housing problem was of the most importance to his constituents. [23] In September 1971, the National House Condition Survey estimated that there were around 1.2 million unfit properties in England and Wales, of which 700,000 (58%) fell within existing or proposed areas for clearance. [24] By the early 1970s, new housing estates were mostly occupied by residents who had been displaced by slum clearance or those who were deemed in greatest need. [25] However that was not always the case. The construction of the Byker Wall in Newcastle upon Tyne was intended to provide modern social housing for the residents of Byker, an area of run-down back-to-back housing. Although the new development won many awards, fewer than 20% of the original 1,700 Byker residents were eventually housed there by 1976. [26]

Aftermath

Beaconsfield Street in Liverpool, pictured in 2012, originally to be demolished as part of housing renewal. The houses have since been restored. Beaconsfield Street, Liverpool.JPG
Beaconsfield Street in Liverpool, pictured in 2012, originally to be demolished as part of housing renewal. The houses have since been restored.

Data from the Ministry of Housing and Local Government suggests that clearances between 1955 and 1985 resulted in around 1.5 million properties demolished and affected about 3.7 million people, although this does not account for people who left the area of their own choice. Few comprehensive studies were conducted at the time on the effect on communities being broken up and resettled. [27]

Pathfinder programme

In 2002, the Labour government launched the Housing Market Renewal Initiative scheme, aiming to demolish, refurbish or construct new housing, which ran until 2011. Known as the Pathfinder programme, areas of housing were demolished and replaced with new houses that were aimed towards aspirational tenants, rather than for residents that had formerly lived in the area. [28] Areas in Liverpool, such as the Welsh Streets and the Granby Streets, were threatened with demolition under the scheme but were saved and have since been regenerated and modernised.

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Tunstall & Lowe 2012, p. 2.
  2. Carter 2012, p. 22.
  3. Carter 2012, p. 8.
  4. Carter 2012, p. 11.
  5. Pooley, Colin G. (January 1985). "Housing for the poorest poor: slum-clerance and rehousing in Liverpool, 1890–1918". Journal of Historical Geography. 11 (1): 70–88. doi:10.1016/S0305-7488(85)80036-0.
  6. Yelling 2004, p. 133.
  7. UK Parliament- Acts 2015.
  8. Parkinson-Bailey 2000, p. 155.
  9. "Slum clearance areas as of February 1932". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 10 March 1932. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  10. "Slum clearance progress in Scotland (1935)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 10 December 1935. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  11. "Slum Clearance (1936)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 29 October 1936. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  12. "Slum clearance orders at the outbreak of World War I". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 25 January 1940. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  13. "Slum Clearance Compensation Bill (1956)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 28 March 1956. col. 2162. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  14. "Slum Clearance Manchester (1965)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 22 November 1965. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  15. "Slum Clearance Update (1957)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 9 July 1957. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  16. "Slum Clearance (1960)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . Written-Answers. 22 November 1960. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  17. 1 2 "Local authorities with clearance problems (1963)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . Written-Answers. 31 July 1963. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  18. 1 2 "Slum Clearance (1970)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 5 May 1970. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  19. "Slum Clearance (1969)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 25 March 1969. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  20. "Slum Clearance Manchester (1965)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 22 November 1965. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  21. Towers 2003, p. 52.
  22. "Slum Statutory Definition (1971)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . Written-Answers. 4 May 1971. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  23. "Slum Clearance Willesden (1970)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 19 March 1970. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  24. "Slum Clearance (1973)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 24 January 1973. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  25. Carter 2012, p. 23.
  26. Minton, Anna (21 May 2015). "Byker Wall: Newcastle's noble failure of an estate – a history of cities in 50 buildings, day 41". The Guardian.
  27. "Research: The impact of post-war slum clearance in the UK". University of York. 1 November 2012. Archived from the original on 21 September 2013.
  28. Hatherley, Owen (19 November 2010). "Pathfinder was slum clearances without the socialism". The Guardian.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urban renewal</span> Land redevelopment in cities

Urban renewal is a program of land redevelopment often used to address urban decay in cities. Urban renewal involves the clearing out of blighted areas in inner cities in favour of new housing, businesses, and other developments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Byker Wall</span> Building in England, UK

The Byker Wall is a long, unbroken block of 620 maisonettes in the Byker district of Newcastle upon Tyne, England. They were designed by Ralph Erskine and constructed in the 1970s. The wall is just part of the estate, which in total covers 200 acres.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Back-to-back house</span> Form of terraced houses in the United Kingdom

Back-to-backs are a form of terraced houses in the United Kingdom, built from the late 18th century through to the early 20th century in various forms. Many thousands of these dwellings were built during the Industrial Revolution for the rapidly increasing population of expanding factory towns. Back-to-backs share party walls on two or three of their four sides, with the front wall having the only door and windows.

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative (HMRI) or Housing Market Renewal (HMR) Pathfinders programme was a controversial scheme of demolition, refurbishment and new-building which ran in the UK between 2002 and 2011 and aimed "to renew failing housing markets in nine designated areas of the North and Midlands of England."

The Atlanta Housing Authority (AHA) is an agency that provides affordable housing for low-income families in Atlanta. Today, the AHA is the largest housing agency in Georgia and one of the largest in the United States, serving approximately 50,000 people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Housing Act of 1949</span> Landmark, sweeping expansion of the federal role in mortgage insurance in the U.S.

The American Housing Act of 1949 was a landmark, sweeping expansion of the federal role in mortgage insurance and issuance and the construction of public housing. It was part of President Harry Truman's program of domestic legislation, the Fair Deal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Overspill estate</span> Housing for relocated inner-city residents

An overspill estate is a housing estate planned and built for the housing of excess population in urban areas, both from the natural increase of population and often in order to rehouse people from decaying inner city areas, usually as part of the process of slum clearance. They were created on the outskirts of most large British towns and during most of the 20th century, with new towns being an alternative approach outside London after World War II. The objective of this was to bring more economic activity to these smaller communities, whilst relieving pressure on overpopulated areas of major cities. The Town Development Act 1952 encouraged the expansion of neighbouring urban areas rather than the creation of satellite communities. The authorities wished to divert people living in poor conditions within highly populous cities to better conditions on the outskirts of these cities. Overspill not only involves moving people to a new area, but requires industry and employment to follow. Often the industries and resources took longer to migrate than the people, hence there were a number of issues surrounding early overspill projects. Slum clearance tenants often had problems with the move, since it separated them from extended family and friends, needed services were often lacking, and only the better off workers could afford the extra cost of commuting back to their jobs. Another criticism was that the new estates occupied what had been productive agricultural land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Everton Park, Liverpool</span> Park in Everton, Liverpool, England

Everton Park, located in Everton, Liverpool, England, is a modern park, covering over 40 hectares (0.40 km2), created between 1984 and 1989, as part of a major house clearance programme, on Everton Hill between Great Homer Street and Everton Road/Heyworth Street. The park is Liverpool City Council owned.

The Carlton Association was a community action group that campaigned on behalf of residents of the suburb of Carlton in Melbourne, Australia, between the years 1969 and 1993. The group was involved in protests against some of the most controversial redevelopment plans in the city’s history and was arguably the most politically successful residents’ action group that Melbourne has seen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Housing Commission of Victoria</span> Government body in Australia

The Housing Commission of Victoria was a Government of Victoria body responsible for public housing in Victoria, Australia. It was established in 1938, and was abolished in 1984.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public housing in the United Kingdom</span> British government and local authority housing programmes

Public housing in the United Kingdom, also known as council housing or social housing, provided the majority of rented accommodation until 2011 when the number of households in private rental housing surpassed the number in social housing. Dwellings built for public or social housing use are built by or for local authorities and known as council houses. Since the 1980s non-profit housing associations became more important and subsequently the term "social housing" became widely used, as technically council housing only refers to housing owned by a local authority, though the terms are largely used interchangeably.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terraced houses in the United Kingdom</span> Popular type of housing in the UK

Terraced houses have been popular in the United Kingdom, particularly England and Wales, since the 17th century. They were originally built as desirable properties, such as the townhouses for the nobility around Regent's Park in central London, and the Georgian architecture that defines the World Heritage Site of Bath.

A pre-regulation terraced house is a type of dwelling constructed before Public Health Act 1875. It is a type of British terraced house at the opposite end of the social scale from the aristocratic townhouse, built as cheap accommodation for the urban poor of the Industrial Revolution. The term usually refers to houses built in the century before the 1875 Act, which imposed a duty on local authorities to regulate housing by the use of byelaws. Subsequently, all byelaw terraced housing was required to meet minimum standards of build quality, ventilation, sanitation and population density. Almost all pre-regulation terraced housing has been demolished through successive waves of slum clearance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welsh Streets, Liverpool</span> Streets in England

The Welsh Streets are a group of late 19th century Victorian terraced streets in Toxteth, Liverpool, England. The houses were designed by Welsh architect Richard Owens and built by Welsh workers to house workers mainly involved in the industries on the docks; the streets were named after Welsh villages and landmarks. The Beatles drummer Ringo Starr lived the first few years of his life in Madryn Street. Although some original houses were lost in World War II bombing, many of the terraced properties in the original street configuration remain in the present day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Granby Four Streets</span> Streets in England

The Granby Four Streets is an area in Toxteth, Liverpool, England, comprising four streets at the tip of a triangle near the Grade II* listed Princes Park. The streets, designed by Welsh architect Richard Owens and built by Welsh workers during the late 19th century are Beaconsfield Street, Cairns Street, Jermyn Street and Ducie Street. A fifth street, Granby Street, connects the four streets together and mostly contains commercial units.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Housing Act 1969</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Housing Act 1969 is an act of Parliament in the United Kingdom that provided grants to home owners and landlords to improve the quality of their housing and to help finance local authorities to improve the quality of housing stock under their control.

The city of Liverpool in Merseyside, England includes a diverse variety of historical housing architectures, some dating back several hundred years, from small working class terrace houses to larger mansions, mostly from the Victorian era. While many remain in the present day, large numbers were demolished and redeveloped during the slum clearances of the 1960s and 1970s and of those that survived, many have since been refurbished.

Slum clearance in India is used as an urban renewal approach to redevelop and transform poor and low income settlements into new developments or housing. Millions of people live in slum dwellings across India and many migrate to live in the slums from rural villages, often in search of work opportunities. Houses are typically built by the slum dwellers themselves and violence has been known to occur when developers attempt to clear the land of slum dwellings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slum clearance in the United States</span> Urban renewal strategy used in the US

Slum clearance in the United States has been used as an urban renewal strategy to regenerate derelict or run-down districts, often to be replaced with alternative developments or new housing. Early calls were made during the 19th century, although mass slum clearance did not occur until after World War II with the introduction of the Housing Act of 1949 which offered federal subsidies towards redevelopments. The scheme ended in 1974 having driven over 2,000 projects with costs in excess of $50 billion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slum clearance in South Africa</span> Urban renewal strategy in South Africa

Slum clearance in South Africa has been used as an urban renewal strategy to regenerate derelict or run-down districts, often to be replaced with alternative developments or new housing.

References