Social rank theory

Last updated

Social rank theory provides an evolutionary paradigm that locates affiliative and ranking structures at the core of many psychological disorders. In this context, displays of submission signal to dominant individuals that subordinate group members are not a threat to their rank within the social hierarchy. This helps to achieve social cohesion. According to social rank theory, anxiety and depression are natural experiences that are common to all mammalian species. It is the pathological exaggeration of anxiety and depression that contributes to psychological disorders.

Contents

Social rank in group living

Three hundred million years ago proto-mammals individually competed for resources such as food, territory, and sexual partners. Over time, some species began to live in groups, which brought the evolutionary advantages of increased protection from predators and adversaries, increased access to resources, and better reproductive success. [1] With the adoption of group living emerged two psychological systems which functioned to preserve the new social order: a social rank system and a safety system. [2]

Upon adopting group living practices, competition between individuals shifted from struggles for territory to social rank, as dominant individuals have better access to limited resources than their subordinates. [1] [3] Dominant positions can also equate to high status as well as the authority to administer punishments and rewards within the group. [4] Ranking benefits the group through the implementation of a social framework that lowers the overall energy expenditure of the group where conspecifics are competing for the same resources. [5] For instance, the acknowledgement of differences in rank curbs aggressive behavior. [6] Ranking also functions as a channel through which social control and resources are allocated. Thus, the purpose of the social rank system is to remain attuned the social hierarchy to better compete for rank, and consequently expand resource acquisition. [2] [4]

Conversely, the safety system views the social world not as a competitive space, but instead as a cooperative space where others may extend reassurances and assistance. Thus, the safety system searches for opportunities to cooperate and connect with potential allies. [2] [4] Evaluations of sameness and difference are crucial to making in-group/out-group distinctions. [7] One's level of belonging within the group is often based on the ability to conform to group mores and standards and has been found to be a predictor of group acceptance, popularity, and rank. [1] [8] It has been suggested that the ingroup/outgroup distinctions may have emerged from kin selection, as hunter-gatherer groups were often genetically related. [9] Within humans, the sense of group belonging has evolved to become fundamental to physical and mental health and security, having important implications for self-esteem and self-identity. [1] [10] [11] Because networks and alliances have become so important in humans, our internal evaluative algorithms, for making both judgments of rank and belonging have become linked. [10]

Social ranking behavior

Studies demonstrate that primates adhere two main forms of group living characterized by opposing interactional styles: agonic and hedonic. [12] The agonic mode of interaction is typical of hierarchical societies, in which group members concentrate on defending against threats to status. Agonic behavior is focused around aggression as well as the inhibition of aggression, often through either submission or appeasement. On the other hand, the hedonic mode of interaction is characteristic of egalitarian societies, where cooperative and affiliative behavior is common. Hedonic behavior is more affectional and is distinguished by reassurance and reconciliation. Both modes of interaction can be found in all societies, to varying degrees.

Agonistic interactions

Ritualistic agonistic behavior

Agonistic competition spans back as far as 300 million years, and thus is deeply ingrained into the genome. [1] Extensive observational evidence of reptiles and birds reveal that when they compete for breeding territory, individuals engage in a specific manner of interactional display, known as ritualistic agonistic behavior (RAB). [10] Opponents confront one another and display various power signals which may include standing tall, maintaining eye contact, or puffing themselves up. [13] [14] [15] [16] This type of behavior can also be found in humans, especially in the context of a physical contest.

RAB functions as a means of evaluating the strength, fighting capability, and resource holding potential (RHP) of one's opponent. [17] [18] If one determines that their own RHP is inferior to that of their adversary and will likely lose the altercation, they may take flight and escape unscathed. On the other hand, if one determines that their own RHP is stronger than that of their opponent, they are free to initiate the altercation. Thus, an accurate internal evaluative algorithm is crucial not only for evading or prolonging potentially fatal fights, but also for provoking winning situations which may improve one's social rank. [10]

Involuntary subordinate strategy

After assessing one's opponent, territorial species usually react with either a fight or flight response. However, in a "blocked escape" scenario, where territory is limited or escape is impossible, this pattern diverges. [10] Upon losing dominance, defeated individuals undergo a change in physical demeanor known as the yielding subroutine of RAB or the involuntary subordinate strategy (ISS). [19] [20] For example, an early study of farmyard fowls found that despite an absence of physical injury, defeated birds seemed to be paralyzed. Furthermore, with their wings and head lowered to the ground, the birds seemed to experience depressive mood. Similarly, another study demonstrated that defeated lizards lost their characteristic bright colors, then died shortly after. [15] Given the proximity to and dependency on conspecifics, group-living animals are perpetually faced with blocked escape scenarios, as a flight response to in-group confrontation would result in both diminished breeding chances as well as heightened threat of predation. [10]

ISS impedes the capability of the subordinate individual to attempt a comeback and signals to their opponent that they are not longer a threat. Thus, ISS is adaptive in that it ensures that when the subordinate individual goes down, they stay down. Meanwhile, it also indicates to the dominant individual that their opponent has truly yielded, so altercation need not continue. [1]

Submissive behaviors

Among group-living species, regular fighting is prevented through the inhibition and control of RAB. Within these groups, subordinates are largely responsible for acknowledging dominant individuals through overt acts of submission. Individuals who believe themselves to be in a subordinate role must be able to prevent the provocation of an attack by a dominant conspecific, or, if an attack is elicited, swiftly terminate the attack. Subordinate individuals are able to accomplish this through submissive involuntary body language, which can include screaming, sideways glances, the fear grin, lowering the eyes, crouching to appear smaller, etc. [10]

Another avenue through which subordinates communicate their submission is through the mobilization of internal inhibition. Like the submissive postures and gestures listed above, internal inhibition is involuntary. This inhibitory process is characterized by the suppression of exploratory behavior and an inability to take initiative, both of which may be the consequences of attempts to avoid the aggressive attention of dominant individuals. [10] Internal inhibition stimulates high states of arousal, and thus, increased levels of tension in subordinates. [21] [22] Internal inhibition can also lead to the loss of energy, depressed mood, retarded movements, reduced information processing capacity, sleep disturbance, poor appetite, loss of confidence, all of which are characteristic of depression. In submitting to dominant individuals and constraining their own reproductive and resource seeking behaviors, subordinates regulate levels of aggression within the group. [10] It is in this context that external and internal inhibitive behaviors are adaptive.

Hedonistic interactions

Within the last ten million years, hedonistic forms of social competition have emerged. In hedonistic interactions individuals actively attract conspecifics in order to elevate social status. [1] Status is achieved through the demonstration of constructive qualities such as beauty, intelligence, talents, and special abilities. [10] Social approval of these qualities raises self-esteem, while disapproval can result in lowered self-esteem, loss of status, and reduced attractiveness to potential mates. [1] In other words, with the knowledge that one is valued by conspecifics signals reassurance and orients individuals towards affiliation as opposed to agonistic interactions. Hedonistic interactions are also characterized by the formation of alliances and coalitions, which offer another avenue through which to improve status. In building networks of alliances, individuals dedicate a lot of effort towards ensuring that one's self-presentation properly conforms to group mores and standards. As a result, a great deal of social life entails the seeking group approval which acts to both confirm rank and impart a sense of belonging. [10]

Mate selection

Social dominance by means of attractiveness has been shown to be essential in determining reproductive success. [23] [24] [25] [26] For instance, it is not strength and aggression, but attractiveness that forms the basis of human mate selection. [27] Human females tend to be drawn towards mates who are able to protect and invest in children. Thus, for women, attractiveness is associated with status. On the other hand, human males are often drawn towards biologically healthy mates which is manifested by natural beauty and youth. [10]

Social investment

The dominance hierarchy is also an attention hierarchy in that well integrated individuals evoke and secure higher levels of positive social attention than less integrated individuals. Not only does positive attention lower defensive arousal, but positive attention from higher ranking individuals heightens mood. Social attention also functions as a means through which individuals can elicit investment from others. Conspecifics may be coaxed into investing in socially attractive individuals, who can then access more resources, form more alliances, secure mates, and affirm group membership. [10] The measure of one's ability to secure attention and elicit investment is known as social attention holding potential (SAHP). With elevated social status, leadership roles, and access to more resources, those with high SAHP benefit from increased evolutionary fitness. On the other hand, individuals with low levels of SAHP tend to display the submissive behaviors characteristic of ISS such as inhibition, withdrawal, and lack of confidence. [1] Estimates of rank and social attractiveness can be internalized. These internal estimates have implications for one's biological state. For instance, depressive brain state patterns may reflect either a primitive defeat-like state which involves loss of feeling and social withdrawal; or a more submissive pattern with various efforts to elicit investment from others; or some combination of the two. [10]

Psychological application

Social rank theory predicts that success within agonistic and hedonistic interactions can have the following effects on human psychopathology: [1]

Interaction TypeResult on Psychopathology
Successful AffiliationSocial adjustment and mental health
Failure in Affiliation Schizoid personality disorder, schizotypal or schizophreniform illness and an introverted, inner-directed mode of personality adjustment
SubmissionLow self-esteem, feelings of shame and humiliation, dependent personality disorder, anxiety, depression, masochism, and a liability to be victimized or abused
DominanceHigh self-esteem, Type A personality, hypomania, sadism, and a liability to victimize and abuse others

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popularity</span> Concept in sociology

In sociology, popularity is how much a person, idea, place, item or other concept is either liked or accorded status by other people. Liking can be due to reciprocal liking, interpersonal attraction, and similar factors. Social status can be due to dominance, superiority, and similar factors. For example, a kind person may be considered likable and therefore more popular than another person, and a wealthy person may be considered superior and therefore more popular than another person.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dominance hierarchy</span> Type of social hierarchy

In biology, a dominance hierarchy is a type of social hierarchy that arises when members of animal social groups interact, creating a ranking system. A dominant higher-ranking individual is sometimes called an alpha, and a submissive lower-ranking individual a beta. Different types of interactions can result in dominance depending on the species, including ritualized displays of aggression or direct physical violence. In social living groups, members are likely to compete for access to limited resources and mating opportunities. Rather than fighting each time they meet, individuals of the same sex establish a relative rank, with higher-ranking individuals often gaining more access to resources and mates. Based on repetitive interactions, a social order is created that is subject to change each time a dominant animal is challenged by a subordinate one.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emperor tamarin</span> Species of New World monkey

The emperor tamarin is a species of tamarin monkey allegedly named for its resemblance to the German emperor Wilhelm II. It lives in the north Brazilian states of Acre and Amazonas and the southwest Amazon Basin, in east Peru, north Bolivia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social dominance orientation</span> Personality trait favoring social hierarchies

Social dominance orientation (SDO) is a personality trait measuring an individual's support for social hierarchy and the extent to which they desire their in-group be superior to out-groups. SDO is conceptualized under social dominance theory as a measure of individual differences in levels of group-based discrimination; that is, it is a measure of an individual's preference for hierarchy within any social system and the domination over lower-status groups. It is a predisposition toward anti-egalitarianism within and between groups.

Rank theory is an evolutionary theory of depression, developed by Anthony Stevens and John Price, and proposes that depression promotes the survival of genes. Depression is an adaptive response to losing status (rank) and losing confidence in the ability to regain it. The adaptive function of the depression is to change behaviour to promote survival for someone who has been defeated. According to rank theory, depression was naturally selected to allow us to accept a subordinate role. The function of this depressive adaptation is to prevent the loser from suffering further defeat in a conflict.

<i>Podarcis hispanicus</i> Species of lizard

Podarcis hispanicus, also known as Iberian wall lizard, is a small wall lizard species of the genus Podarcis. It is found in the Iberian peninsula, in northwestern Africa and in coastal districts in Languedoc-Roussillon in France. In Spanish, this lizard is commonly called lagartija Ibérica.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shark agonistic display</span> Animal behavior

Agonism is a broad term which encompasses many behaviours that result from, or are triggered by biological conflict between competing organisms. Approximately 23 shark species are capable of producing such displays when threatened by intraspecific or interspecific competitors, as an evolutionary strategy to avoid unnecessary combat. The behavioural, postural, social and kinetic elements which comprise this complex, ritualized display can be easily distinguished from normal, or non-display behaviour, considered typical of that species' life history. The display itself confers pertinent information to the foe regarding the displayer's physical fitness, body size, inborn biological weaponry, confidence and determination to fight. This behaviour is advantageous because it is much less biologically taxing for an individual to display its intention to fight than the injuries it would sustain during conflict, which is why agonistic displays have been reinforced through evolutionary time, as an adaptation to personal fitness. Agonistic displays are essential to the social dynamics of many biological taxa, extending far beyond sharks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reproductive suppression</span>

Reproductive suppression is the prevention or inhibition of reproduction in otherwise healthy adult individuals. It includes delayed sexual maturation (puberty) or inhibition of sexual receptivity, facultatively increased interbirth interval through delayed or inhibited ovulation or spontaneous or induced abortion, abandonment of immature and dependent offspring, mate guarding, selective destruction and worker policing of eggs in some eusocial insects or cooperatively breeding birds, and infanticide, and infanticide in carnivores of the offspring of subordinate females either by directly killing by dominant females or males in mammals or indirectly through the withholding of assistance with infant care in marmosets and some carnivores. The Reproductive Suppression Model argues that "females can optimize their lifetime reproductive success by suppressing reproduction when future conditions for the survival of offspring are likely to be greatly improved over present ones”. When intragroup competition is high it may be beneficial to suppress the reproduction of others, and for subordinate females to suppress their own reproduction until a later time when social competition is reduced. This leads to reproductive skew within a social group, with some individuals having more offspring than others. The cost of reproductive suppression to the individual is lowest at the earliest stages of a reproductive event and reproductive suppression is often easiest to induce at the pre-ovulatory or earliest stages of pregnancy in mammals, and greatest after a birth. Therefore, neuroendocrine cues for assessing reproductive success should evolve to be reliable at early stages in the ovulatory cycle. Reproductive suppression occurs in its most extreme form in eusocial insects such as termites, hornets and bees and the mammalian naked mole rat which depend on a complex division of labor within the group for survival and in which specific genes, epigenetics and other factors are known to determine whether individuals will permanently be unable to breed or able to reach reproductive maturity under particular social conditions, and cooperatively breeding fish, birds and mammals in which a breeding pair depends on helpers whose reproduction is suppressed for the survival of their own offspring. In eusocial and cooperatively breeding animals most non-reproducing helpers engage in kin selection, enhancing their own inclusive fitness by ensuring the survival of offspring they are closely related to. Wolf packs suppress subordinate breeding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mozambique tilapia</span> Species of fish

The Mozambique tilapia is an oreochromine cichlid fish native to southeastern Africa. Dull colored, the Mozambique tilapia often lives up to a decade in its native habitats. It is a popular fish for aquaculture. Due to human introductions, it is now found in many tropical and subtropical habitats around the globe, where it can become an invasive species because of its robust nature. These same features make it a good species for aquaculture because it readily adapts to new situations. It is known as black tilapia in Colombia and as blue kurper in South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agonistic behaviour</span> Any social behaviour related to fighting

Agonistic behaviour is any social behaviour related to fighting. The term has broader meaning than aggressive behaviour because it includes threats, displays, retreats, placation, and conciliation. The term "agonistic behaviour" was first implemented by J.P Scott and Emil Fredericson in 1951 in their paper "The Causes of Fighting in Mice and Rats" in Physiological Zoology.Agonistic behaviour is seen in many animal species because resources including food, shelter, and mates are often limited.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social defeat</span>

Social defeat is a concept used in the study of the physiological and behavioral effects of hostile interactions among either conspecific animals, or humans, in either a dyadic or in a group-individual context, potentially generating very significant consequences in terms of control over resources, access to mates and social positions.

<i>Neolamprologus pulcher</i> Species of fish

Neolamprologus pulcher is a species of cichlid endemic to Lake Tanganyika where it prefers locations with plenty of sedimentation. The common names for N. pulcher include daffodil cichlid, fairy cichlid, princess of Zambia and lyretail cichlid. This species can reach a length of 10 centimetres (3.9 in) TL. It can also be found in the aquarium trade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dominance signal</span> Type of animal communication

A dominance signal is used in a dominance hierarchy or pecking order to indicate an animal's dominance. Dominance signals are a type of internal environment signal that demonstrate the signalers attributes [2]. Dominance signals are necessary for several species for mating, maintaining social hierarchies and defending territories Dominance signals also provide information about an animals fitness. Animals have developed conflict management strategies to reduce frequency of aggressive incidents in competitive matters. This evolution is the basis of dominance signals[3].

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bite inhibition</span>

Bite inhibition, sometimes referred to as a soft mouth, is a behavior in carnivorans whereby the animal learns to moderate the strength of its bite. It is an important factor in the socialization of pets.

Female intrasexual competition is competition between women over a potential mate. Such competition might include self-promotion, derogation of other women, and direct and indirect aggression toward other women. Factors that influence female intrasexual competition include the genetic quality of available mates, hormone levels, and interpersonal dynamics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Winner and loser effects</span> Aggression phenomenon observed in animals

The winner and loser effect is an aggression phenomenon in which the winner effect is the increased probability that an animal will win future aggressive interactions after experiencing previous wins, while the loser effect is the increased probability that an animal will lose future aggressive interactions after experiencing previous losses. Overall these effects can either increase or decrease an animals aggressive behaviour, depending on what effect affects the species of concern. Animals such as Agkistrodon contortrix, Rivulus marmoratus, and Sula nebouxii show either both or one of these effects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Primate sociality</span>

Primate sociality is an area of primatology that aims to study the interactions between three main elements of a primate social network: the social organisation, the social structure and the mating system. The intersection of these three structures describe the socially complex behaviours and relationships occurring among adult males and females of a particular species. Cohesion and stability of groups are maintained through a confluence of factors, including: kinship, willingness to cooperate, frequency of agonistic behaviour, or varying intensities of dominance structures.

<i>Anolis auratus</i> Species of lizard

Anolis auratus, the grass anole, is a species of lizard in the family Dactyloidae. The species is found in Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela, Colombia, French Guiana, Guyana, and Brazil.

In evolutionary psychology and evolutionary anthropology, dual strategies theory states humans increase their status in social hierarchies using two major strategies known as dominance and prestige.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Stevens, Anthony; Price, John (2016). Evolutionary psychiatry: a new beginning (Classic ed.). New York: Routledge. ISBN   9781138824638. OCLC   935679992.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. 1 2 3 Gilbert, P.; Cheung, M. S-P.; Grandfield, T.; Campey, F.; Irons, C. (2003). "Recall of threat and submissiveness in childhood: development of a new scale and its relationship with depression, social comparison and shame". Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 10 (2): 108–115. doi:10.1002/cpp.359. ISSN   1063-3995.
  3. ↑ Tse, Wai S.; Wu, Jayne; Poon, Kai-Chung (May 2011). "Motivation for achievement as perceived resource value in social rank theory of depression: A structural equation modeling analysis". Personality and Individual Differences. 50 (7): 1034–1038. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.019. ISSN   0191-8869.
  4. 1 2 3 Weisman, Ora; Aderka, Idan M.; Marom, Sofi; Hermesh, Haggai; Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva (June 2011). "Social rank and affiliation in social anxiety disorder". Behaviour Research and Therapy. 49 (6–7): 399–405. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.010. ISSN   0005-7967. PMID   21497793.
  5. ↑ P., Barash, David (1977). Sociobiology and behavior . New York: Elsevier. ISBN   0444990291. OCLC   2614371.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ↑ M., Dunbar, Robin I. (1988). Primate Social Systems. Boston, MA: Springer US. ISBN   9781468466966. OCLC   852790506.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ↑ Brown, Roger (1986). Social Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press. ISBN   9780029083000. OCLC   12237533.
  8. ↑ Wright, Jack C.; Giammarino, Mary; Parad, Harry W. (1986). "Social status in small groups: Individual—group similarity and the social "misfit."". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50 (3): 523–536. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.523. ISSN   1939-1315.
  9. ↑ Wenegrat, B. (1984). Sociobiology and Mental Disorder: A New View. California: Addison-Wesley.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Gilbert, Paul (2016). Depression: the evolution of powerlessness. New York: Routledge. ISBN   978-1317189428. OCLC   956521476.
  11. ↑ Abrams, D.; Wetherell, M.; Cochrane, S.; Hogg, M. A.; Turner, J. C. (June 1990). "Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization". The British Journal of Social Psychology. 29 (Pt 2): 97–119. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x . ISSN   0144-6665. PMID   2372667.
  12. ↑ Chance, Michael R.A. (1988). Social fabrics of the mind. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd. OCLC   911386423.
  13. ↑ Lorenz, Konrad (1981). The Foundations of Ethology. New York: Springer Verlag.
  14. ↑ MacLean, P. D. (1977). "The triune brain in conflict". Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 28 (1–4): 207–220. doi:10.1159/000287065. ISSN   0033-3190. PMID   416456.
  15. 1 2 MacLean, P. D. (April 1985). "Brain evolution relating to family, play, and the separation call". Archives of General Psychiatry. 42 (4): 405–417. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790270095011. ISSN   0003-990X. PMID   3977559.
  16. ↑ Archer, John (1988). The Behavioural Biology of Aggression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. ↑ Parker, G. A. (September 1974). "Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 47 (1): 223–243. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8. ISSN   0022-5193. PMID   4477626.
  18. ↑ Parker, G.A. (1984). "Evolutionary Strategies". In Krebs, John R.; Davies, Nick B. (eds.). Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
  19. ↑ Price, John S.; Sloman, Leon. "Depression as yielding behaviour: an animal model based upon Schjelderup-Ebbe's pecking order". Ethology and Sociobiology. 8: 85s–98s.
  20. ↑ Price, J.; Sloman, L.; Gardner, R.; Gilbert, P.; Rohde, P. (March 1994). "The social competition hypothesis of depression". The British Journal of Psychiatry. 164 (3): 309–315. doi:10.1192/bjp.164.3.309. ISSN   0007-1250. PMID   8199784. S2CID   44702973.
  21. ↑ Henry, J.P.; Stephens, P.M. (1977). Stress, Health, and the Social Environment : a Sociobiologic Approach to Medicine. New York, NY: Springer Verlag. ISBN   9781461263654. OCLC   852792281.
  22. ↑ Sapolsky, R. M. (November 1989). "Hypercortisolism among socially subordinate wild baboons originates at the CNS level". Archives of General Psychiatry. 46 (11): 1047–1051. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110089012. ISSN   0003-990X. PMID   2554841.
  23. ↑ Shively, Carol (1985). "The Evolution of Dominance Hierarchies in Nonhuman Primates". In Ellyson, Steve L.; Dovidio, John F. (eds.). Power, Dominance and Nonverbal Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  24. ↑ Trivers, Robert (1985). Social Evolution. California: Benjamin/Cummings.
  25. ↑ Richards, Graham (1987). Human Evolution: An Introduction for the Behavioural Sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  26. ↑ Dunbar, Robin Ian MacDonald (1988). Primate Social Systems. London: Croom Helm.
  27. ↑ Buss, David M. (1989). "Sex differences in human mate preference: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures". Brain and Behavioral Sciences. 12: 1–49. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00023992 .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.