Sociology of quantification

Last updated

The sociologyof quantification is the investigation of quantification as a sociological phenomenon in its own right. [1]

Contents

Content

According to a review published in 2018, the sociology of quantification is an expanding field which includes the literature on the quantified self, on algorithms, and on various forms of metrics and indicators. [2] A prior review in 2016 names a similar range of topics: "quantification processes in the sciences, quantification in society driven by the sciences, quantification processes driven by other social processes, including for example implementations of numeric technologies, standardization procedures, bureaucratic management, political decision-taking and newer trends as self-quantification." [3] Older works which can be classified under the heading of the sociology of quantification are Theodore Porter’s Trust in Numbers, [4] the works of French sociologists Pierre Bourdieu [5] [6] and Alain Desrosières, [7] and the classic works on probability by Ian Hacking [8] and Lorraine Daston. [9] The discipline gained traction due to the increasing importance and scope of quantification, [2] its relation to the economics of conventions, [10] and the perception of its dangers as a weapon of oppression [11] [12] [13] or as means to undesirable ends. [12] [14]

For Sally Engle Merry quantification is a technology of control, but whether it is reformist or authoritarian depends on who harnessed it and for what purpose. [15] The ‘governance by numbers’ is seen by jurist Alain Supiot as repudiating the goal of governing by just laws, advocating in its stead the attainment of measurable objectives. For Supiot the normative use of economic quantification leaves no option for countries and economic actors than to ride roughshod over social legislation, and pledge allegiance to stronger powers. [16]

The French movement of ‘statactivisme’ suggests fighting numbers with numbers under the slogan “a new number is possible". [5] On the other extreme, algorithmic automation is seen as an instrument of liberation by Aaron Bastani, [17] spurring a debate on digital socialism. [18] [19] According to Espeland and Stevens [1] an ethics of quantification would naturally descend from a sociology of quantification, especially at an age where democracy, merit, participation, accountability and even "fairness" are assumed to be best discovered and appreciated via numbers. Andrea Mennicken and Wendy Espeland provide a review (2019) of the main concerns about the "increasing expansion of quantification into all realms, including into people’s personal lives". [20] These authors discuss the new patterns of visibility and obscurity created by quantitative technologies, how these influence relations of power, and how neoliberal regimes of quantification favour 'economization', where "individuals, activities, and organizations are constituted or framed as economic actors and entities." Mennicken and Robert Salais have curated in 2022 a multi-author volume titled The New Politics of Numbers: Utopia, Evidence and Democracy, [21] with contributions encompassing Foucauldian studies of governmentality, which first flourished in the English-speaking world, and studies of state statistics known as ‘economics of convention’, developed mostly at INSEE in France. A theme treated by several authors is the relationship between quantification and democracy, with regimes of algorithmic governmentality [22] and artificial intelligence posing a threat to democracy and to democratic agency. [23] [24]

Mathematical modelling is a field of interest for sociology of quantification, [25] and the intensified use of mathematical models in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic has spurred a debate on how society uses models. Rhodes and Lancaster speak of 'model as public troubles' [26] and starting from models as boundary objects call for a better relation between models and society. Other authors propose five principles for making models serve society, on the premise that modelling is a social activity. [27] Models as mediators between 'theories' and 'the world' are discussed in a multi-author book edited by Mary S. Morgan and Margaret Morrison [25] that offers several examples from physics and economics. The volume provides a historical and philosophical discussion of what models are and of what models do, with contributions from the authors as well as from scholars such as Ursula Klein, Marcel Boumans, R.I.G. Hughes, Mauricio Suárez, Geert Reuten, Nancy Cartwright, Adrienne van den Boogard, and Stephan Hartmann. [28] A later work by Morgan offers elements of history, sociology and epistemology of modelling in economics and econometrics. [29] Relevant material for a sociology of mathematical models can be found in the works of Ian Scoones and Andy Stirling, [30] [31] in Mirowski’s Machine Dreams, in Evelyn Fox Keller Making Sense of Life, Jean Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation , in Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar's Laboratory Life .

The role of quantification in historiography and macrohistory is the subject of The Measure of Reality: Quantification in Western Europe, 1250-1600 , a 1997 nonfiction book by Alfred W. Crosby. The book examines the origins and effects of quantitative thinking in post-medieval European history, suggesting it as a major factor in the ensuing development of European arts and techniques. [32]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social science</span> Branch of science that studies society and its relationships

Social science is one of the branches of science, devoted to the study of societies and the relationships among members within those societies. The term was formerly used to refer to the field of sociology, the original "science of society", established in the 18th century. In addition to sociology, it now encompasses a wide array of academic disciplines, including anthropology, archaeology, economics, geography, linguistics, management, communication studies, psychology, culturology and political science.

Neo institutionalism is an approach to the study of institutions that focuses on the constraining and enabling effects of formal and informal rules on the behavior of individuals and groups. New institutionalism traditionally encompasses three major strands: sociological institutionalism, rational choice institutionalism, and historical institutionalism. New institutionalism originated in work by sociologist John Meyer published in 1977.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic sociology</span> Branch of sociology

Economic sociology is the study of the social cause and effect of various economic phenomena. The field can be broadly divided into a classical period and a contemporary one, known as "new economic sociology".

Modernization theory or modernisation theory holds that as societies become more economically modernized, wealthier and more educated, their political institutions become increasingly liberal democratic. The "classical" theories of modernization of the 1950s and 1960s, most influentially articulated by Seymour Lipset, drew on sociological analyses of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Talcott Parsons. Modernization theory was a dominant paradigm in the social sciences in the 1950s and 1960s, and saw a resurgence after 1991, when Francis Fukuyama wrote about the end of the Cold War as confirmation on modernization theory.

In political economy, decommodification is the strength of social entitlements and citizens' degree of immunization from market dependency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theodore Porter</span> American historian of science (born 1953)

Theodore M. Porter is a historian of science emeritus in the Department of History at UCLA. He is known for his histories of statistical thinking and quantification, particularly the sociology of quantification.

Alain Desrosières was a statistician, sociologist and historian of science in France, known for his work in the history of statistics. He is the author of The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning , published in 1993, translated into several languages, including English in 1998, and subsequently reviewed in the LRB in 2000. This described the origins of statistics as technical machinery for administration in the 19th and 20th centuries, including the attempts to measure human and economic development. The text is an account of the statistics and their use in abstracting features of society to better measure and understand them, with particular aims.

In computer science and mathematical logic, satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) is the problem of determining whether a mathematical formula is satisfiable. It generalizes the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) to more complex formulas involving real numbers, integers, and/or various data structures such as lists, arrays, bit vectors, and strings. The name is derived from the fact that these expressions are interpreted within ("modulo") a certain formal theory in first-order logic with equality. SMT solvers are tools that aim to solve the SMT problem for a practical subset of inputs. SMT solvers such as Z3 and cvc5 have been used as a building block for a wide range of applications across computer science, including in automated theorem proving, program analysis, program verification, and software testing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wendy Brown</span> American political theorist (born 1955)

Wendy L. Brown is an American political theorist. She is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, NJ. Previously, she was Class of 1936 First Professor of Political Science and a core faculty member in The Program for Critical Theory at the University of California, Berkeley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Complexity economics</span> Application of complexity science to economics

Complexity economics is the application of complexity science to the problems of economics. It relaxes several common assumptions in economics, including general equilibrium theory. While it does not reject the existence of an equilibrium, it sees such equilibria as "a special case of nonequilibrium", and as an emergent property resulting from complex interactions between economic agents. The complexity science approach has also been applied to computational economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laurent Thévenot</span>

Laurent Thévenot is a French sociologist Professor at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (Paris).

Alain Supiot FBA is a French legal scholar.

Primitive communism is a theory to describe the gift economies of hunter-gatherers throughout history, where resources and property hunted or gathered are shared within the group. In political sociology and anthropology, it is also a concept, that describes hunter-gatherer societies as traditionally being based on egalitarian social relations and common ownership. A primary inspiration for both Marx and Engels were Lewis H. Morgan's descriptions of "communism in living" as practised by the Haudenosaunee of North America. In Marx's model of socioeconomic structures, societies with primitive communism had no social class structures or capital accumulation.

Neo-Marxism is a collection of Marxist schools of thought originating from 20th-century approaches to amend or extend Marxism and Marxist theory, typically by incorporating elements from other intellectual traditions such as critical theory, psychoanalysis, or existentialism. Neo-Marxism comes under the broader framework of the New Left. In a sociological sense, neo-Marxism adds Max Weber's broader understanding of social inequality, such as status and power, to Marxist philosophy.

Marc Edelman is an academic author and professor of anthropology at Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. He was president of the American Ethnological Society from 2017 to 2019.

Ethics of quantification is the study of the ethical issues associated to different forms of visible or invisible forms of quantification. These could include algorithms, metrics/indicators, statistical and mathematical modelling, as noted in a review of various aspects of sociology of quantification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrea Saltelli</span> Italian researcher (born 1953)

Andrea Saltelli is an Italian scholar specializing in quantification using statistical and sociological tools. He has extended the theory of sensitivity analysis to sensitivity auditing, focusing on physical chemistry, environmental statistics, impact assessment and science for policy. He is currently Counsellor at the UPF Barcelona School of Management.

The Politics of Modelling, Numbers Between Science and Policy is a multi-authors book edited by Andrea Saltelli and Monica Di Fiore and published in August 2023 by Oxford University Press.

<i>The New Politics of Numbers</i> 2022 book by multiple authors

The New Politics of Numbers: Utopia, evidence and democracy is a multi-author book edited by sociologists Andrea Mennicken and Robert Salais and published in 2022 by Palgrave Macmillan.

Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life is a book by Theodore Porter, published in 1995 by Princeton University Press, that proposes that quantification in public life is driven by bureaucratic necessities to obtain legitimacy through objectivity.

References

  1. 1 2 Espeland, Wendy N.; Stevens, Mitchell L. (2008). "A Sociology of Quantification". European Journal of Sociology. 49 (3): 401–436. JSTOR   23998802.
  2. 1 2 Berman, Elizabeth Popp; Hirschman, Daniel (2018). "The Sociology of Quantification: Where Are We Now?". Contemporary Sociology. 47 (3): 257–266. doi:10.1177/0094306118767649.
  3. ↑ Diaz-Bone, Rainer; Didier, Emmanuel (2016). "The Sociology of Quantification - Perspectives on an Emerging Field in the Social Sciences". Historical Social Research. 41 (2): 7–26. JSTOR   43798480.
  4. ↑ Porter, Theodore (2020) [1995]. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (paperback ed.). Princeton University Press. ISBN   9780691208411.
  5. 1 2 Bruno, Isabelle; Didier, Emmanuel; Prévieux, Julien (2014). Statactivisme: Comment Lutter avec des Nombres. Zones (in French). La Découverte. ISBN   9782355220548.
  6. ↑ Robson, Karen; Sanders, Chris, eds. (2009). Quantifying Theory: Pierre Bourdieu. Springer. ISBN   978-1-4020-9449-1.
  7. ↑ Desrosières, Alain (2002). The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Translated by Naish, Camille. Harvard University Press. ISBN   9780674009691.
  8. ↑ Hacking, Ian (1990). The Taming of Chance. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9780521388849.
  9. ↑ Daston, Lorraine (1995) [1988]. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (paperback ed.). Princeton University Press. ISBN   9780691006444.
  10. ↑ Salais, Robert (2012). "Quantification and the Economics of Convention". Historical Social Research. 37 (4): 55–63. JSTOR   41756473.
  11. ↑ Espeland, Wendy Nelson; Sauder, Michael (2016). Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. Russell Sage Foundation. JSTOR   10.7758/9781610448567.
  12. 1 2 Muller, Jerry Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press. ISBN   9780691174952.
  13. ↑ O'Neil, Cathy (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN   978-0-553-41881-1.
  14. ↑ Porter, Theodore M. (2013). "Funny Numbers". Culture Unbound. 4 (4): 585–598. doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124585.
  15. ↑ Merry, Sally Engle (2016). The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago University Press. ISBN   9780226261287.
  16. ↑ Supiot, Alain (2017). Governance by Numbers: The Making of a Legal Model of Allegiance. Translated by Brown, Saskia. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN   9781509907748.
  17. ↑ Bastani, Aaron (2019). Fully Automated Luxury Capitalism: A Manifesto. Verso. ISBN   9781786632623.
  18. ↑ Mostafa, Joshua (July 23, 2019). "The Revolution Will Not Be Automated: Joshua Mostafa on Shoshana Zuboff". Sydney Review of Books. Retrieved December 9, 2024.
  19. ↑ Morozov, Evgeny (March–June 2019). "Digital Socialism? The Calculation Debate in the Age of Big Data". New Left Review (116/117): 33–67.
  20. ↑ Mennicken, Andrea; Espeland, Wendy Nelson (2019). "What's New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification". Annual Review of Sociology. 45 (1): 223–245. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343.
  21. ↑ Mennicken, Andrea; Salais, Robert, eds. (2022). The New Politics of Numbers: Utopia, Evidence and Democracy. Executive Politics and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78201-6. ISBN   978-3-030-78201-6.
  22. ↑ Supiot, Alain (March 18, 2015). La Gouvernance par les nombres: Cours au Collège de France 2012-2013 (in French). Fayard. ISBN   9782213681092.
  23. ↑ Salais, Robert (2022). "La Donnée n'est Pas Un Donné: Statistics, Quantification and Democratic Choice". In Mennicken, Andrea; Salais, Robert (eds.). The New Politics of Numbers: Utopia, Evidence and Democracy. Executive Politics and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 379–415. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78201-6. ISBN   978-3-030-78201-6.
  24. ↑ McQuillan, Dan (2022). Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence. Bristol University Press. ISBN   978-1529213508.
  25. 1 2 Morgan, Mary S.; Morrison, Margaret, eds. (2010) [1999]. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science (ebook ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511660108. ISBN   9780511660108.
  26. ↑ Rhodes, Tim; Lancaster, Kari (May 13, 2020). "Mathematical models as public troubles in COVID-19 infection control: following the numbers". Health Sociology Review. 29 (2): 177–194. doi:10.1080/14461242.2020.1764376.
  27. ↑ Saltelli, Andrea; Bammer, Gabriele; Bruno, Isabelle; Charters, Erica; Di Fiore, Monica; Didier, Emmanuel; Espeland, Wendy Nelson; Kay, John; Piano, Samuele Lo; Mayo, Deborah; Pielke Jr., Roger; Portaluri, Tommaso; Porter, Theodore M.; Puy, Arnald; Rafols, Ismael; Ravetz, Jerome R.; Reinert, Erik; Sarewitz, Daniel; Stark, Philip B.; Stirling, Andrew; van der Sluijs, Jeroen; Vineis, Paolo (June 24, 2020). "Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto". Nature. 582: 482–484. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-01812-9.
  28. ↑ Guala, Francesco; Psillos, Stathis (2001). "Models as Mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Mary S. Morgan and Margaret Morrison (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 1999, xi + 401 pages". Economics and Philosophy. 17 (2): 275–294. doi:10.1017/S0266267101230272.
  29. ↑ Morgan, Mary S. (September 17, 2012). The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139026185. ISBN   978-1-107-00297-5.
  30. ↑ Scoones, Ian (2024). Navigating Uncertainty: Radical Rethinking for a Turbulent World. Polity Press. ISBN   978-1-5095-6008-0.
  31. ↑ Scoones, Ian; Stirling, Andy, eds. (2020). The Politics of Uncertainty: The Challenges of Transformation. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003023845. ISBN   978-1-00-302384-5.
  32. ↑ Crosby, Alfred W. (1996). The Measure of Reality: Quantification in Western Europe, 1250–1600. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050518. ISBN   978-0-521-55427-5.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.