From 1974 to 1983,he was President of the Committee for the History of Sociology of the International Sociological Association. He was the co-director of the European Forum on Citizenship at the European University Institute from 1995 to 1996.
In April 2006,Lukes married the political commentator and author Katha Pollitt,this being his third marriage. Lukes was previously a widower.[8] He has three children from his previous marriage to the English barrister Nina Stanger.[citation needed]
Academic interests
Lukes' main interests are political and social theory,the sociology of Durkheim and his followers,individualism,rationality,the category of the person,Marxism and ethics,sociology of morality and new forms of liberalism,varieties of conceptions of power,the notion of the "good society",rationality and relativism,moral conflict and politics.
He is a member of the editorial board of the European Journal of Sociology and directs a research project on what is left of the socialist idea in Western and Eastern Europe.
The three dimensions of power
One of Lukes' academic theories is that of the "three faces of power," presented in his book,Power:A Radical View. This theory claims that power is exercised in three ways:decision-making power,non-decision-making power,and ideological power.[citation needed][9]
Decision-making power is the most public of the three dimensions. Analysis of this "face" focuses on policy preferences revealed through political action.[10]
Non-decision-making power is that which sets the agenda in debates and makes certain issues (e.g.,the merits of socialism in the United States) unacceptable for discussion in "legitimate" public forums. Adding this face gives a two-dimensional view of power allowing the analyst to examine both current and potential issues,expanding the focus on observable conflict to those types that might be observed overtly or covertly.[11]
Ideological power allows one to influence people's wishes and thoughts,even making them want things opposed to their own self-interest (e.g.,causing women to support a patriarchal society). Lukes offers this third dimension as a "thoroughgoing critique" of the behavioural focus of the first two dimensions,[12] supplementing and correcting the shortcomings of previous views,allowing the analyst to include both latent and observable conflicts. Lukes claims that a full critique of power should include both subjective interests and those "real" interests held by those excluded by the political process.[13]
Marxism
In his 1982 article "Can a Marxist Believe in Human Rights?" and the 1985 book Marxism and Morality,Lukes attributed a hostility towards human rights to Marx's thought,arguing that Karl Marx dismissed such individual protections against arbitrary power as expressions of bourgeois egoism,and that therefore Marxism shows an original incompatibility with a defence of human rights. The debate sparked by his contested proposition drew responses from Leszek Kołakowski (in agreement[14]),Drucilla Cornell and William McBride,among others.[15]
Similarly to Joseph Schumpeter,Lukes has criticised Marx and Friedrich Engels for rejecting utopianism,which according to him resulted in Marxism's failure "to clarify its ends" and to propose imaginative solutions.[16]
↑ Pickering, W.S.F.; Martins, H. (2014). "Introduction". Debating Durkheim. London: Routledge. p.3. ISBN978-0415869546. It was not without significance that Evans-Pritchard was the supervisor of the thesis ...
↑ "Curriculum Vitae". Steven Lukes.net. 9 August 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
↑ Heywood, Andrew. (2013). Faces of power. In The Palgrave Macmillan Politics (4th ed., p. 9). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Heywood used the terms power as agenda setting and power as thought control for the second and third faces of power.
↑ Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan Press, 1974. p. 15.
↑ Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan Press, 1974. p. 20.
↑ Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan Press, 1974. p. 24.
↑ Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan Press, 1974. p. 25.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
