Syston and Peterborough Railway

Last updated

The Syston and Peterborough Railway was an early railway in England opened between 1846 and 1848 to form a connection from the Midland Counties Railway near Leicester to Peterborough, giving access to East Anglia over the Eastern Counties Railway. The project was part of the ambition of George Hudson to establish and maintain a monopoly of railway service over a large area of England. The surveying of the line achieved notoriety when Robert Sherard, 6th Earl of Harborough, who was hostile to railways, arranged a battle to obstruct surveys of the proposed line, and later of its construction.

Contents

The line later formed part of a new direct route from Nottingham to Kettering and London, and later still was the base of the Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway, giving access to Norfolk and parts of Suffolk.

The core of the line between Syston and Peterborough remains in use today, carrying a useful service of cross-country traffic.

Origins

First railways; and the rise of George Hudson

The beginnings of the Syston to Peterborough line in 1846 Syston - Peterborough 1846.png
The beginnings of the Syston to Peterborough line in 1846

On 10 May 1844, the Midland Railway Act was passed, creating a new company by the amalgamation of three smaller concerns. From the outset, its Chairman was George Hudson, the so-called 'Railway King'. Hudson was a skilful manipulator, and his methods were often dubious. He dominated several railway companies, and his ambition was to get them working together to form a near-monopoly, at a time when control of a large district of the country by a railway concern was feasible. His lines formed a through route from York to Rugby, where it joined the London and Birmingham Railway (later the London and North Western Railway—LNWR), giving access to London. Although long-distance passenger business was important, the transport of coal from colliery districts to industrial areas was dominant; and transport of manufactured goods to areas of consumption was also key. [1] [2] [3] [4]

Great Northern Railway proposed, and opposed by Hudson

In 1844 promoters put together a scheme to link London and York; it became considerably modified and was later called the Great Northern Railway (GNR), to connect London and Doncaster. Hudson saw this as a competitive threat to his lines: as well as providing a more direct route between London and York than his own affiliated companies, the GNR would block the route by which Hudson's lines might connect to East Anglia. Hudson also controlled the Eastern Counties Railway, and the area it served was a large consumer of coal and agricultural supplies, hitherto not well connected to the railway network north of London. Hudson’s plan was that his Midland Railway and his Eastern Counties Railway would link and monopolise that traffic.

Accordingly Hudson went to great lengths in an attempt to frustrate the Great Northern Railway's authorisation in Parliament, but ultimately he failed and the Great Northern Railway Act 1846 (9 & 10 Vict. c. lxxi) was passed, on 26 June 1846. The GNR promoters had spent £590,355 on Parliamentary expenses. [note 1] [5]

Planning and construction

Authorisation

Rearsby station Rearsby station.jpg
Rearsby station

Having failed to kill off the Great Northern Railway promoters' scheme, Hudson now took steps to enhance his access to East Anglia. The Eastern Counties Railway was established there and was planned to reach Peterborough. Hudson now proposed a new railway from the Midland Railway main line at Syston, north of Leicester, to Peterborough, where it could link with the Eastern Counties Railway. [6] The new line was expected to cost £700,000. [7]

The Syston and Peterborough line was authorised by Parliament on 30 June 1845. [8] [6]

The Act authorised construction of a branch line to Peterborough from a triangular junction at Syston; the line would run through Melton Mowbray, Oakham, Luffenham and Stamford, forming a junction at Peterborough, not with the north-south Great Northern Railway, but the intended west to east Eastern Counties Railway. The Midland trains were to have running powers into the ECR's passenger station and goods yard there. [8] [9]

The Battle of Saxby

Frisby signal box and station site Frisby station site geograph-3538801-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg
Frisby signal box and station site

Lord Harborough had his estate at Stapleford Park, near Saxby. The Midland Railway’s intention was to make the line of railway pass the margin of his estate, but Lord Harborough was exceptionally hostile to the railway’s incursion. As well as his personal aversion to it, he was a major shareholder in the Oakham Canal; [10] this had opened in 1802, bringing coal to Oakham and taking agricultural produce away; the canal was threatened commercially by the railway.

In an encounter that marked the first phase of what came to be called the Battle of Saxby, seven of Hudson's surveyors arrived in the Stapleford area in November 1844 to survey the route of the line. Lord Harborough had fixed notices at the boundaries of his lands, notices prohibiting entry to his park for surveying purposes, and he had stationed estate workers at strategic points along his boundaries. As they approached the Park, the Midland surveyors were confronted by several of Lord Harborough's men, armed with pitchforks and sticks, and ordered away, even though they were still on public land. When they refused to turn back, they were "arrested", and taken by cart to the local magistrate. Since the Midland men had committed no crime, there was no legal action that could be taken against them; a policeman pointed this out to Harborough's man, and he had to be content with tipping them out of the cart into the road.

The following day the surveyors returned, supported by a large group of navvies, as well as some prize-fighters from Nottingham. Lord Harborough's men had also reinforced their numbers, and a general fight followed. The Midland surveyors were eventually put to flight. Violence escalated again a couple of days later in another battle, during which surveying equipment was badly damaged. Several prison sentences and fines were awarded to the fighting men on both sides, and surveying activities were suspended for the time being. [11]

Further obstruction from Lord Harborough

Melton Mowbray station up platform 2018 at Melton Mowbray station - platform 1.JPG
Melton Mowbray station up platform

Even after the MR had gained Parliamentary approval for its route in June 1845, Lord Harborough stubbornly refused to allow any construction work to be started anywhere near his estate. Faced with this unreasonable opposition, the Midland Railway decided to re-route the line a little further away from Stapleford Park, but when the surveyors arrived, with a bodyguard, to take new measurements and levels they were once again confronted by a group of Lord Harborough's men, and the second Battle of Saxby was soon in full swing. [note 2] This time Lord Harborough himself participated by driving his carriage into the ranks of the surveyors. The surveying did eventually get done, and the deviation was authorised by Act of 16 June 1846, with the provision for a tunnel to be driven underneath a spinney of fine trees known as Cuckoo Plantation, on Lord Harborough's estate so that the offending trains would be hidden from his Lordship’s view. Unfortunately during construction the tunnel collapsed, causing subsidence to the trees and increased hostility from Harborough. [11] [12]

A legal battle followed, and yet another deviation was authorised on 22 July 1847. By this time, the two sections of line on either side of the Saxby area had already been built and were in operation, that from Syston to Melton from 1 September 1846, and from Peterborough to Stamford from 2 October 1846. Because of Lord Harborough's intransigence, it was not until 1 May 1848 that these two sections were linked, and the whole through route in operation.

The Midland Railway had agreed to purchase the Oakham Canal in April 1845, for the sum of £26,000 and 200 new Midland £40 shares. Traffic on the canal was clearly declining, and in the very dry summer of 1844 the waterway had been unnavigable for five months and goods had to be transported by road. [11]

Opening

Stamford railway station Stamford railway station.jpg
Stamford railway station

Notwithstanding Lord Harborough's obstructive tactics, the Midland Railway had got the authorising Act for its line, and at length was able to construct the line, if not to its preferred alignment near Saxby.

The line opened in stages: from Syston South Junction (as it became) to Melton Mowbray on 1 September 1846; and from a temporary station at Stamford to the ECR station at Peterborough on 2 October 1846. There was to be a tunnel at Stamford, its construction accounting for the delay. [13]

At first the only station at Peterborough was the Eastern Counties Railway station, on a west to east alignment (much later known as Peterborough East). In fact the ECR itself did not reach there (from Ely and March) until 1847, so that for a time from 2 June 1845, it was only served by London and Birmingham Railway trains from Northampton. [14]

The London and Birmingham Railway had suggested to the Eastern Counties Railway that a joint station would be mutually beneficial, but this was opposed by the ECR. The ECR's Ely line was not opened for goods traffic until 10 December 1846 and for passengers until 14 January 1847.

Meanwhile, traffic on the L&BR branch had so expanded that the track into Peterborough was doubled in September 1846. On 2 October 1846 of that year, still in advance of the ECR, the Midland Railway line from Stamford was opened, crossing the River Nene by a timber bridge, and using the ECR station and goods facilities. In 1923 this station was renamed Peterborough East, but for the time being it was the only Peterborough station, owned by the ECR and only used by two guest railways, the L&BR and the Midland Railway. [15]

The Stamford to Peterborough line of the Midland Railway was of course cut off from the rest of the Company’s network, and the MR arranged for it to be worked at first by the London and North Western Railway, of which the London and Birmingham Railway had become a part, and then, with a Stamford-Ely service, by the Eastern Counties Railway. [15] [16] The Midland line was single track at first but soon converted to double track. [17]

The Syston to Peterborough line in 1848 Syston to Peterborough 1848.png
The Syston to Peterborough line in 1848

The central section of the line opened on 20 March 1848 to goods trains, and fully on 1 May 1848. [13]

The authorisation for the line had included an east-to-north curve at Syston. This was opened in early 1854. [13]

Great Northern Railway at Peterborough

The Great Northern Railway was building its line from Lincoln to Peterborough, but it was temporarily unable to complete its line at the Peterborough end, requiring additional powers for some shared bridge structures. Accordingly on 17 October 1848 it opened from Lincoln to Peterborough, but at Werrington Junction a temporary connection was made to the Midland Railway line, and for a time GNR trains ran over the Midland line, and used the Eastern Counties Railway station as a temporary Peterborough terminus. On 7 August 1850 the GNR completed its line from London (Maiden Lane) to Werrington Junction, and its trains transferred to its own route; the Werrington connection was removed. The GNR opened its own station, which much later became known as Peterborough North, and is the present-day Peterborough station. The GNR main line to Retford was opened on 15 July 1852 for goods trains, and 1 August 1852 for passengers. [18]

This meant that there were two major railway stations in Peterborough, some distance apart. The two routes had run alongside one another from Helpston, a distance of about seven miles. Moreover the Midland Railway trains passed the GNR station on the journey to the ECR station in Peterborough.

This caused complaint from passengers intending to travel to London by changing to a GNR train, and between 1 February 1858 and 1 August 1866, the Midland Railway provided a station called Crescent. It was alongside the Great Northern Railway station; Midland trains called on the way to and from the GER (former Eastern Counties Railway) terminal. The Crescent station was closed when the Peterborough, Wisbech and Sutton Bridge Railway opened to passengers; Midland Railway passenger trains were permitted to call at the GNR station, where an additional platform had been provided. PW&SBR services continued to the GER station, enlarged by an island but still having only two main platform lines, until 30 September 1904. [18]

Later developments

Manton – Melton – Nottingham

The Syston to Peterbrough in 1879 Syston to Peterbrough 1879.png
The Syston to Peterbrough in 1879

As traffic developed, the Midland Railway found that the Leicester are became congested, and that a heavy and slow coal traffic and a frequent express passenger service were difficult to manage. The company decided on a new railway from Nottingham to Rushton, near Kettering, which was more direct. The new route joined the Syston line at Melton Mowbray, and it diverged again at Manton. The line opened to goods traffic on 1 November 1879, to local passenger trains on 2 February 1880, and to through express trains on 1 June 1880. In 1903 it was carrying over a dozen express and stopping trains each way daily. [19]

The Midland and Great Northern Joint Line

The Eastern and Midland Railway had been formed by takeover of several smaller Companies controlling the lines between Bourne and Lynn. In 1888, in collaboration with the Midland Railway, the E&MR proposed a line westwards from Bourne crossing the GNR main line south of Little Bytham station, where there would be a connecting junction and making an end-on junction with the existing MR mineral branch line at Cottesmore. This involved a commitment from the E&MR to favour the Midland over the GNR, and when Parliamentary authorisation was sought, this favouritism caused the Bill to be rejected.

A better approach was now adopted, in which the Midland Railway and the GNR collaborated in designing an alternative scheme. The E&MR was now in deep financial trouble and had to take a back seat. The new scheme would cross the GNR main line north of Little Bytham station and as before, have a connecting spur to it. As far as this point the line would be joint; the spur to the GNR would be GNR only, and the continuing line would be exclusively Midland Railway.

Up coal train approaching Manton Manton up coal train geograph-2769680-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg
Up coal train approaching Manton

The alignment at Saxby, forced on the Midland Railway by Lord Harborough, was proving a significant hindrance to express trains on the route, and the scheme included the construction of an easier alignment as part of the new junction there. Plans for the new line were submitted for the 1889 Parliamentary session. The Bill passed, being given the Royal Assent on 24 June 1889. By this time it was obvious that the E&MR's financial problems were insuperable, and in 1891 the MR and GNR made an offer to take over the E&MR route jointly, and, after some negotiation, this offer was accepted. The new line was referred to tas the Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway (M&GNJR). The Committee of the M&GNJR took control on 1 July 1893. The Bourne to Saxby line had been opened to goods traffic on 4 June 1893. The dominant traffic was coal eastbound; passenger operation was delayed until 1 May 1894. [20]

The Little Bytham Loop on to the GNR main line was not proceeded with, because the GNR considered their access to the Joint Line at Spalding sufficient, bearing in mind their other access point from Essendine. [21]

Quadruple track

The Syston to Peterborough line in 1893 Syston to Peterborough1893.png
The Syston to Peterborough line in 1893

As traffic grew, congestion on the double track railway became an increasing issue. This was particularly the case after the 1880 transfer of the Nottingham express trains to the line, as the disparity in speed between an express passenger train and a slow mineral train almost always reduced line capacity considerably. The opening of the M&GN Joint Railway added to congestion. Although some widening projects were described as "quadrupling", the Midland actually installed a series on long goods loops (or in some cases passenger loops). The MR always called the end of a four track section a junction whether or not another route was joining the main line there.

As part of the work to improve the junction and alignment at Saxby in connection with the construction of the line to Bourne, a four track section was established, running from Saxby to Wymondham Junction. The work was probably completed in 1892 and may have been removed in 1961. [22]

Manton station was provided with up platform loop lines, shown in 1885 and 1930 diagrams. [23]

Loops were provided between Oakham and Langham Junction, from 15 March 1891. [24]

In the first years of the twentieth century it was decided to install goods loops between Melton Mowbray and Brentingby Junction. These were commissioned on 4 December 1904. The line was straight and level at Brentingby so it was an ideal place to install water troughs, which was done on all four tracks, coming into use on 3 May 1905. The troughs on the goods lines were of limited use due to the slower speed of trains there and they were removed in 1926. [note 3] On the main line the troughs remained in use until steam traction finished, and they were removed around 1966. The Brentingby Junction signal box remained open until 25 June 1978, when the loops were shortened and worked from Melton signal box. [25]

Cottesmore iron ore

An iron ore train at Brooksby Brooksby railway station 1923003 d0e1c10e.jpg
An iron ore train at Brooksby

Iron ore was found in the area crossed by the Syston and Peterbrough line when the line to Nottingham was being excavated in 1878. Holwell ironworks was established to extract the mineral, at first brought to Ashwell station by horse and cart. A branch line to Cottesmore sidings opened on 27 November 1882, running from Ashwell Junction. Within the quarry area there was a network of narrow gauge lines to the quarry faces. The branch was always for mineral traffic only. The line closed on 13 March 1972; the quarry was unable to compete with cheap imported ore. A signal box was erected at Ashwell Junction in 1919, but it was never commissioned, the points being worked from a ground frame. [26]

ROF Queniborough

Stamford railway station in modern times Stamford railway station - geograph.org.uk - 2510389.jpg
Stamford railway station in modern times

During World War II a Royal Ordnance Factory filling station, ROF No 10, was established at Queniborough. It was rail connected on the south-east side of the line about two miles from Syston. Construction started in 1940 and it was producing output in 1942; the railway connections were commissioned on 9 November 1941. Workers’ trains were run into the site, and passenger platforms were provided. It was decommissioned in 1959, and the railway facilities were removed on 8 February 1970. The area has now been developed as a domestic housing and light industrial estate, known as East Goscote. [27] [28] [29]

Passenger train services

Before the 1872 opening of the Nottingham direct line, the train service was limited to five trains each way daily, two on Sundays, with some short workings.

After the opening of the Nottingham line, it is not obvious (from Bradshaw) that the route was excessively congested, and that may point to a heavy mineral and goods service. A summer timetable after opening of the M&GNJR shows a number of through services along the Norfolk Coast. [30] [31] [32]

Present day passenger service

Although many local passenger stations have been closed, the line continues to support a good passenger train service. In 2022, typical weekday services run hourly from Stansted Airport or Cambridge to Birmingham and back. Syston north curve has two regular workings, the 04:56 and 06:07 Nottingham to Norwich trains run by that route Mondays to Fridays, a few minutes later on Saturdays. Liverpool to Norwich trains generally run via Nottingham and Grantham, but in the event of engineering works blocking that route, the trains are often diverted by Syston north curve. [33] [34] [35]

Locations

Notes

  1. Something over £73 million in 2022.
  2. Clark refers to this as the Battle of Saxby Bridge (over the Oakham Canal). He says that fifty surveyors were involved in this encounter.
  3. It is remarkable that slow line troughs were installed at all. The quadrupling consisted of slow line loops, and trains using them must have stood at the exit signal, for other trains to pass; they could have taken water there, from a column. The only exception would have been slow passenger trains being overtaken by an express, that might not have been properly delayed in the loop, but could have taken water at the Melton station call afterwards (for down trains) or before (for up trains).

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Midland Main Line</span> Railway in the UK

The Midland Main Line (MML) is a major railway line from London to Sheffield in Yorkshire via the East Midlands. It comprises the lines from London's St Pancras station via Leicester, Derby/Nottingham and Chesterfield.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Northern Railway (Great Britain)</span> British railway company, 1846 to 1922

The Great Northern Railway (GNR) was a British railway company incorporated in 1846 with the object of building a line from London to York. It quickly saw that seizing control of territory was key to development, and it acquired, or took leases of, many local railways, whether actually built or not. In so doing, it overextended itself financially.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway</span> Former railway network in England

The Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway (M&GNJR) was a railway network in England, in the area connecting southern Lincolnshire, the Isle of Ely and north Norfolk. It developed from several local independent concerns and was incorporated in 1893. It was jointly owned by the Midland Railway and the Great Northern Railway, and those companies had long sponsored and operated the predecessor companies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Syston railway station</span> Railway station in Leicestershire, England

Syston railway station is a railway station serving the town of Syston in Leicestershire, England. The station is on the Midland Main Line from Leicester to Loughborough, 103 miles 63 chains (167.0 km) down the line from London St Pancras.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peterborough railway station</span> Railway station in Cambridgeshire, England

Peterborough railway station serves the cathedral city of Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, England. It is sited 76 miles 29 chains (122.9 km) north of London King's Cross. The station is a major interchange serving both the north–south East Coast Main Line, as well as long-distance and local east–west services. The station is managed by London North Eastern Railway. Ticket gates came into use at the station in 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stamford railway station</span> Grade II* listed railway station in Lincolnshire, England

Stamford railway station serves the town of Stamford in Lincolnshire, England, and is located in St Martin's. The station is 12.5 miles (20 km) west of Peterborough. It was opened by the Syston and Peterborough Railway, part of the present day Birmingham to Peterborough Line. CrossCountry operate the majority of services as part of their Birmingham to Stansted Airport route. It is owned by Network Rail and managed by East Midlands Railway

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oakham railway station</span> Railway station in Rutland, England

Oakham railway station serves the county town of Oakham in Rutland, England. The station is situated almost halfway between Leicester – 27 miles (43 km) to the west – and Peterborough – 25 miles (40 km) eastward on the Syston and Peterborough Railway, the line is the Birmingham to Peterborough Line.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Melton Mowbray railway station</span> Railway station in Leicestershire, England

Melton Mowbray railway station serves the market town of Melton Mowbray in Leicestershire, England. It is owned by Network Rail and operated by East Midlands Railway, though CrossCountry operates most of the services as part of its Birmingham New Street to Stansted Airport route. The station is on the route of the Syston and Peterborough Railway, which is now part of the Birmingham to Peterborough Line. It has a ticket office, which is staffed part-time, a car park, and help points for times when no staff are present.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oakham Canal</span>

The Oakham Canal ran from Oakham, Rutland to Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire in the East Midlands of England. It opened in 1802, but it was never a financial success, and it suffered from the lack of an adequate water supply. It closed after 45 years, when it was bought by the Midland Railway to allow the Syston and Peterborough Railway to be built, partly along its course. Most of it is infilled, although much of its route can still be seen in the landscape, and there are short sections which still hold water.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peterborough East railway station</span> Former railway station in Cambridgeshire, England

Peterborough East was a railway station in Peterborough, England. It was opened on 2 June 1845 and closed to passenger traffic on 6 June 1966. Located on East Station Road just off Town Bridge, only the engine sheds and one platform remain. The station had services running west to Northampton and Rugby, as well as to the east to March, Wisbech, and Norwich.

The Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Railway, colloquially referred to as "the Joint Line" was a railway line connecting Doncaster and Lincoln with March and Huntingdon in the eastern counties of England. It was owned jointly by the Great Northern Railway (GNR) and the Great Eastern Railway (GER). It was formed by transferring certain route sections from the parent companies, and by the construction of a new route between Spalding and Lincoln, and a number of short spurs and connections. It was controlled by a Joint Committee, and the owning companies operated their own trains with their own rolling stock. The Joint Line amounted to nearly 123 miles (198 km) of route.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saxby railway station</span> Former railway station in Leicestershire, England

Saxby railway station was a station serving the villages of Saxby and Freeby, Leicestershire. It was located between the two villages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ashwell railway station</span> Former railway station in Rutland, England

Ashwell railway station was a station in Ashwell, Rutland on the line between Melton Mowbray and Oakham. It lies west of the village, on the road to Whissendine. Just north of Ashwell was Ashwell Junction where the Cottesmore Ironstone Branch joined. This was in use between 1883 and 1974 and served quarries in the vicinity of Cottesmore and Exton. Part of the former mineral branch line is now Rutland Railway Museum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manton railway station</span> Former railway station in Rutland, England

Manton railway station or Manton Junction is a former railway station which served the villages of Manton and Wing in the county of Rutland.

The Great Northern and London and North Western Joint Railway was a British railway line, almost entirely within Leicestershire. Authorised by the same Act of Parliament, the Great Northern Railway Leicester Branch was built, branching from the Joint Line; on the same basis the Newark to Bottesford Line was built. The lines opened progressively between 1879 and 1883. The dominant traffic was iron ore, and the agricultural produce of the area served also generated considerable business. The passenger usage was never heavy, although some unusual through services were attempted at first.

The Northampton and Peterborough Railway was an early railway promoted by the London and Birmingham Railway (L&BR) to run from a junction at Blisworth on the L&BR main line to Northampton and Peterborough, in England. The construction of the line was authorised by Parliament in 1843 and the 47 mile line opened in 1845. The line largely followed the river Nene, and for the economy of construction, it had many level crossings with intersecting roads, rather than bridges. In 1846 the L&BR joined with other companies, together forming the London and North Western Railway (LNWR).

The Stamford and Essendine Railway was built to connect Stamford, Lincolnshire, in England, to the nearby Great Northern Railway. It was a short line, and it opened in 1856. It was not commercially successful, and the directors sought a means of connecting Stamford directly to Peterborough. This was the Sibson Extension, opened from Stamford to Wansford in 1867, but the junction there did not facilitate through running to Peterborough, and the Sibson Extension was even less successful than the first line. It was closed in 1929.

The Leen Valley lines of the Great Northern Railway were railway branch lines built to access the collieries in the Nottinghamshire coalfield in England. The Midland Railway had long been dominant in the area, but there was resentment against its monopolistic policies from coalowners, who encouraged the Great Northern Railway to build a line. The Leen Valley Line was opened in 1881; it ran as far as Annesley colliery. A passenger service was run the following year, and very considerable volumes of coal were hauled.

Robert Sherard, 6th Earl of Harborough, styled Lord Sherard from 1797 to 1799, was a British peer.

The Nottingham direct line of the Midland Railway was a new route created in 1879 to relieve congestion on the established routes of the Midland Railway, in England. It consisted of two connecting lines that, together with part of an existing route, formed a new route from Nottingham to near Kettering. The line was used for Nottingham to London express passenger trains, and for heavy mineral and goods trains heading south. As well as shortening the transit a little, the new line had the effect of relieving congestion on the original main line through Leicester, that had become excessively congested.

References

  1. Donald J Grant, Directory of the Railway Companies of Great Britain, Matador, Kibworth Beauchamp, 2017, ISBN   978-1-78589-353-7, pages 378 and 379
  2. P S Stevenson, The Midland Counties Railway, Railway and Canal Historical Society, 1989, ISBN   978-0-901461-11-7, pages 29 to 31, 33 and 35
  3. Roy Williams, The Midland Railway: A New History, David & Charles, Newton Abbot, 1988, ISBN   978-0-7153-8750-4, page 39
  4. Ian Bailey, The Rise and Fall of the Railway King, Alan Sutton Publishing Limited, Stroud, 1995, ISBN   978-0-7509-0493-3, pages 47 to 50
  5. John Wrottesley, The Great Northern Railway, Volume I: Origins and Development, B T Batsford Limited, London, 1979, ISBN   0-7134-1590-8, pages 11 to 17
  6. 1 2 Robin Leleux, A Regional History Of Railways Of Great Britain: Volume IX: The East Midlands, David & Charles, Newton Abbot, 1976, ISBN   978-0-7153-7165-7, pages 109 to 111
  7. F S Williams, The Midland Railway: Its Rise and Progress, Bemrose and Son, Derby, 1874, page 94
  8. 1 2 Clement E Stretton, The History of the Midland Railway, Methuen & Co, London, 1901, pages 80 and 81
  9. Grant, pages 551 and 552
  10. "Lord Harborough and the Midland Railway Company". Leicester Chronicle or Commercial and Leicestershire Mercury. 23 November 1844. p. 2. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  11. 1 2 3 John Rhodes, Bourne to Saxby, KMS Books, Boston, 1989, reproduced in Stewart Squires and Ken Hollamby, Building a Railway, Bourne to Saxby, Lincoln Record Society, 2009, ISBN   978-0-9015038-62, pages 109, 111 and 112
  12. Ronald H Clark, A Short History of the Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway, Goose and Son, Norwich, 1967, page 51
  13. 1 2 3 John Gough, The Midland Railway: A Chronology, self published, 1986, ISBN   978-0-9511310-0-8, pages 29 to 31
  14. Leleux, page 52
  15. 1 2 Gordon, page 225
  16. Stretton, page 86
  17. P Waszak, Rail Centres: Peterborough, Booklaw Publications, Nottingham, 2005 (reprint of Ian Allan 1984), ISBN   978-1-901945-14-0, page 10
  18. 1 2 Gordon, page 227
  19. Leleux, page 79
  20. Rhodes, pages 112 to 114
  21. Clark, page 24
  22. Peter Smith, The Syston and Peterborough Railway, self published, 2013, ISBN   978-1-4937-6975-9, pages 41, 48 and 49
  23. Smith, page 70
  24. Smith, page 60
  25. Smith, pages 38 and 39
  26. Smith, page 55
  27. Smith, page 14
  28. M E Quick, Railway Passenger Stations in England, Wales and Scotland: A Chronology, version 5.03, September 2021, Railway and Canal Historical Society, electronic download, page 371
  29. Brief description and photographs at https://www.flickr.com/photos/goldie87/albums/72157629705563996/
  30. Bradshaw's General Steam Navigation and Railway Guide, 12th mo, (December) 1895, reprinted by Middleton Press, Midhurst, 2011, ISBN   978-1-908174-11-6
  31. Bradshaw's General Railway and Steam Navigation Guide, 7th mo, (July) 1922, reprinted by Guild Publishing, London, 1985
  32. Bradshaws July 1938 Railway Guide, David & Charles Publishers, Newton Abbot, 1969, ISBN   978-0-7153-4686-0
  33. Timetable information, Cross Country
  34. Timetable information, East Midlands Railway
  35. Branch Line Society, Passenger Train Services over Unusual Lines, 2022
  36. Quick, entries alphabetically arranged