Transnational cinema

Last updated

Transnational cinema is a developing concept within film studies that encompasses a range of theories relating to the effects of globalization upon the cultural and economic aspects of film. [1] It incorporates the debates and influences of postnationalism, postcolonialism, consumerism and Third cinema, [2] amongst many other topics.

Contents

Criteria

Transnational cinema debates consider the development and subsequent effect of films, cinemas and directors which span national boundaries.

The concept of transnational flows and connection in cinema is not a new term – judging by film history and the increasing number of book titles that now bear its name – but the recent theoretical and paradigmatic shift raises new attention and questions.

Transnational cinema urges a certain shift away from films with a national focus. Ezra and Rowden argue that Transnational cinema “comprises both globalization […] and the counter hegemonic responses of filmmakers from former colonial and third world countries”, and further that the transnational can link people or institutions across the nations. [3] The transnational works like a partnership which is joined together through several mediums, such as cinema. [4] In connection to this, Sheldon Lu has identified what she calls ‘an era of transnational postmodern cultural production’ in which borders between nations have been blurred by new telecommunications technologies as a means of explaining the shift from national to transnational cinema. [5]

As to this, the telecommunications technologies threatens the concept of a national cinema, as especially the connection powers of the internet links people and institutions and thereby converts national cinema to a transnational cinema. Ezra and Rowden states: "the vast increase in the circulation of films enabled by technologies such as video, DVD and new digital media heightens the accessibility of such technology for both film-makers and spectators". [3]

Transnational cinema’ appears to be used and applied with increasing frequency and as Higbee and Song Hwee argues, as a shorthand for an international mode of film production whose impact and reach lies beyond the bounds of the national. The term is occasionally used in a simplified way to indicate international coproduction or partnership between e.g. the cast, crew and location without any real consideration of what the aesthetic, political or economic implications of such transnational collaboration might mean. [5] Based on this proliferation of the term, Higbee and Song Hwee mention that it has led some scholars to questions whether the term is profitable to use or not. In fact, a panel on transnational cinema took place at the 2009 Screen Studies Conference in Glasgow where members questioned the term ‘transnational’ and its critical purpose in film theory. [5]

Key debates

A key argument of transnational cinema is the necessity for a redefinition, or even refutation, of the concept of a national cinema. National identity has been posited as an 'imaginary community' that in reality is formed of many separate and fragmented communities defined more by social class, economic class, sexuality, gender, generation, religion, ethnicity, political belief and fashion, than nationality. [6]

The increasingly transnational practices in film funding, production, and distribution combined with the 'imagined community' thus provide the basis for an argued shift towards a greater use of transnational, rather than national, perspectives within film studies. [6] Global communication through the internet has also resulted in changes within culture and has further resulted in film transcending perceived national boundaries. [7]

Ongoing definition

The broad scope of topics relating to Transnational cinema has raised some criticisms over its exact definition, as Mette Hjort notes:

(...) to date the discourse of cinematic transnationalism has been characterized less by competing theories and approaches than by a tendency to use the term ‘transnational’ as a largely self-evident qualifier requiring only minimal conceptual clarification. [8]

Subsequently, Hjort, John Hess, and Patricia R. Zimmermann, [9] amongst others, have attempted to clearly define the utilization and implementation of Transnational cinema theories.

The concept of ‘transnational cinema’ has been highly debated for decades and scholars have yet to agree on a single definition. In fact, in many cases, the various definitions of ‘transnational cinema’ presented by different scholars have been very much in contradiction to one another. Scholars have taken to breaking down the term into distinct categories, in an attempt to allow a generally broad idea to become more clearly defined.

For example, Deborah Shaw of the University of Portsmouth alongside Armida De La Garza of University College Cork, created a carefully crafted list of fifteen types of reading film through a transnational lens. [10] The categories included: modes of narration; national films; transregional/transcommunity films; transnational critical approaches; cinema of globalization; films with multiple locations; modes of production, distribution, and exhibition; transnational collaborative networks; transnational viewing practices; transregional/transcommunity films; cultural exchange; transnational influences; transnational stars; transnational directors; the ethics of transnationalism; exilic and diasporic filmmaking; and transnational collaborative networks. [11] In addition, Mette Hijort of Lingnan University in Hong Kong, coined seven modes of transnational cinematic production: cosmopolitan; affinitive; epiphanic; globalizing; milieu-building; opportunistic; and experimental. [10] More broadly, Steven Vertovec of the Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, presented six facets of transnationalism in general which he believed to be worthy of further research. Specifically, transnationalism as: a type of consciousness; a site of political engagement; an avenue of capital; a (re)construction of ‘place’ or locality; social morphology; and a mode of cultural reproduction. [12]

Despite these attempts to repeatedly divide transnational cinema into more digestible and comprehensible pieces, the concept still remains largely ambiguous. The term is often used when referring to foreign films consumed by those of different nationalities with the help of subtitles, as well as in reference to films that “challenge national identity." [13] To certain scholars it marks the moment in time when globalization began to impact the art of cinema, while to others it stretches back to the earliest days of filmmaking. Some consider it to be “big-budget blockbuster cinema associated with the operations of global corporate capital, [and still others define it as] small-budget diasporic and exilic cinema.” [13]

Dr. Zhang Yingjin, a professor of Chinese Studies and Comparative Literature at the University of California, San Diego, goes as far as to argue that the term is obsolete due to the volume and inconsistency of its uses and definitions. He explains that if the concept merely points to film as a medium that has the ability to transcend languages, cultures, and nations, then it has been “already subsumed by comparative film studies” and therefore lacks any value within academia. [13]

Problems within Transnational Cinema

While the dynamic and often contradictory term itself sparks confusion, there remain many films that effectively represent the nature of transnational cinema in a multitude of ways, working to unthink Eurocentric film norms. It is important to note that while traditional cinema has the tendency to perpetuate binary division, World Cinema makes efforts to overcome those binaries to be all-encompassing and inclusive. Despite these efforts, however, the “films most likely to circulate transnationally are those that are more ‘Western-friendly’” and have adopted “familiar genres, narratives, or themes.” [14] This is often done to fulfill the “desire for tasty, easily swallowed, apolitical global-cultural morsels,” craved by audiences accustomed to American Orientalism. [15]

The 2012 Oscar-nominated documentary film The Act of Killing , directed by Joshua Oppenheimer uses reenactment as a process of memory and critical thinking in the re-telling of the Indonesian genocide of 1965. It focuses on one perpetrator, in particular, revisiting and re-enacting his experiences as an executioner, forcing himself and audiences to physically and psychologically re-live the historical event. The re-enactment provides a physical discourse that allows audiences and actors alike to re-live the events that took place, recreating memories on screen. While the film takes place from the perspective of the perpetrator, focusing on the experiences of those murdered, it was not directed by anyone involved or affected, but rather by a white, Western filmmaker. With his whiteness and Western perspective comes a sense of trust and authority felt by Indonesian elites as well as world-wide audiences of which Oppenheimer was aware, using it to his advantage as a storyteller. This problematic Westernized view often shines through in Oppenheimer’s questions and commentary throughout what he calls a "documentary of the imagination". Though well-intentioned, his “love letter” of a film becomes a “shock therapy session prescribed and carried out by a concerned Westerner” rather than an authentic retelling from the Indonesian perspective. [16]

This film is a prime example of the problems that arise within the world of Transnational cinema; Films are often tailored to the Western audience or at the very least, told by a member of the Western world. Since most authentic transnational films void of Eurocentric influence are distributed via film festivals rather than blockbuster screenings, they often do not easily reach Western audiences. Should films such as The Act of Killing cross borders and nations, they require funding that only Western-based films are provided- many of which end up speaking for minority groups from a majority perspective. As Linda Alcoff frames it, certain anthropological conversations become "conversations of 'us' with 'us' about 'them' of the white man with the white man about the primitive-nature man," constantly othering those who are oppressed or do not fall within Eurocentric standards. [17] She believes it to be necessary that the "study of and advocacy for the oppressed" must be conducted by the oppressed themselves, rather than those more privileged. [18] In fact, the act of speaking from a place of privilege on the behalf of those less privileged often results in reinforced oppression of those minority groups. [18] Transnational films must strive to follow these same guidelines, allowing for stories to be told by those who have lived them or by those still affected by the events of those stories. Creating a global community through transnational cinema can be possible, but only when the tools and perspectives involved branch beyond the binary of Western versus "Other."

List of transnationalist films

List of filmmakers associated with transnational cinema

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cultural imperialism</span> Cultural aspects of imperialism

Cultural imperialism comprises the cultural dimensions of imperialism. The word "imperialism" describes practices in which a country engages culture to create and maintain unequal social and economic relationships among social groups. Cultural imperialism often uses wealth, media power and violence to implement the system of cultural hegemony that legitimizes imperialism.

Diaspora studies is an academic field established in the late 20th century to study dispersed ethnic populations, which are often termed diaspora peoples. The usage of the term diaspora carries the connotation of forced resettlement, due to expulsion, coercion, slavery, racism, or war, especially nationalist conflicts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Gilroy</span> British historian (born 1956)

Paul Gilroy is an English sociologist and cultural studies scholar who is the founding Director of the Sarah Parker Remond Centre for the Study of Race and Racism at University College, London (UCL). Gilroy is the 2019 winner of the €660,000 Holberg Prize, for "his outstanding contributions to a number of academic fields, including cultural studies, critical race studies, sociology, history, anthropology and African-American studies".

Transnationalism is a research field and social phenomenon grown out of the heightened interconnectivity between people and the receding economic and social significance of boundaries among nation states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subaltern (postcolonialism)</span> Concept from critical theory and post-colonial studies

In postcolonial studies and in critical theory, the term subaltern designates and identifies the colonial populations who are socially, politically, and geographically excluded from the hierarchy of power of an imperial colony and from the metropolitan homeland of an empire. Antonio Gramsci coined the term subaltern to identify the cultural hegemony that excludes and displaces specific people and social groups from the socio-economic institutions of society, in order to deny their agency and voices in colonial politics. The terms subaltern and subaltern studies entered the vocabulary of post-colonial studies through the works of the Subaltern Studies Group of historians who explored the political-actor role of the common people who constitute the mass population, rather than re-explore the political-actor roles of the social and economic elites in the history of India.

Hybridity, in its most basic sense, refers to mixture. The term originates from biology and was subsequently employed in linguistics and in racial theory in the nineteenth century. Its contemporary uses are scattered across numerous academic disciplines and is salient in popular culture. Hybridity is used in discourses about race, postcolonialism, identity, anti-racism and multiculturalism, and globalization, developed from its roots as a biological term.

Robert Stam is an American film theorist working on film semiotics. He is a professor at New York University, where he teaches about the French New Wave filmmakers. Stam has published widely on French literature, comparative literature, and on film topics such as film history and film theory. Together with Ella Shohat, he co-authored Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National cinema</span> Term used in film theory and criticism to describe films associated with a nation-state

National cinema is a term sometimes used in film theory and film criticism to describe the films associated with a specific nation-state. Although there is little relatively written on theories of national cinema it has an irrefutably important role in globalization. Film provides a unique window to other cultures, particularly where the output of a nation or region is high.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arif Dirlik</span> Turkish historian

Arif Dirlik was a Turkish-American historian who published on historiography and political ideology in modern China, as well as issues in modernity, globalization, and post-colonial criticism. Dirlik received a BSc in Electrical Engineering at Robert College, Istanbul in 1964 and a PhD in History at the University of Rochester in 1973.

Ella Shohat, is a professor of cultural studies at New York University, where she teaches in the departments of Art & Public Policy and Middle Eastern & Islamic Studies. She has written and lectured on the topics of Eurocentrism, Orientalism, Postcolonialism, Transnationalism, and Diasporic cultures.

Postcolonialism is the critical academic study of the cultural, political and economic legacy of colonialism and imperialism, focusing on the impact of human control and exploitation of colonized people and their lands. The field started to emerge in the 1960s, as scholars from previously colonized countries began publishing on the lingering effects of colonialism, developing a critical theory analysis of the history, culture, literature, and discourse of imperial power.

The study of global communication is an interdisciplinary field focusing on global communication, or the ways that people connect, share, relate and mobilize across geographic, political, economic, social and cultural divides. Global communication implies a transfer of knowledge and ideas from centers of power to peripheries and the imposition of a new intercultural hegemony by means of the "soft power" of global news and entertainment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ara Wilson</span>

Ara Wilson is a university professor and author.

Mediated cross-border communication is a scholarly field in communication studies and refers to any mediated form of communication in the course of which nation state or cultural borders are crossed or even get transgressed and undermined.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hamid Naficy</span>

Hamid Naficy is an Iranian-born American filmmaker, writer, scholar, and educator. He is the Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani Professor in Communication at Northwestern University in the department of Radio/Film/Television, an affiliate faculty member in the Department of Art History, and a core member of the Middle East and North African Studies Program.

Jigna Desai is a Professor in the Department of Gender, Women and Sexuality Studies and Asian American Studies, currently at the University of Minnesota. She is a writer, teacher, mentor, artist, and engaged researcher whose scholarship crosses many fields of study including transnational feminism, Asian American Studies, queer studies, postcolonial feminism, critical disability studies, critical youth studies, feminist media studies, critical ethnic studies, and critical university studies. She has also written extensively on issues of racial and gender disparities and social justice.

Dal Yong Jin is a media studies scholar. He is Distinguished SFU Professor in the School of Communication at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada where his research explores digital platforms, digital games, media history, political economy of communication, globalization and trans-nationalization, the Korean Wave, and science journalism. He has published more than 30 books and penned more than 200 journal articles, book chapters, and book reviews. Jin has delivered numerous keynote speeches, conference presentations, invited lectures, and media interviews on subjects such as digital platforms, video games, globalization, transnational culture, and the Korean Wave. Based on his academic performance, he was awarded the Outstanding Scholar Award from the Korean American Communication Association at the KACA 40th Anniversary Conference in 2018, while receiving the Outstanding Research Award from the Deputy Prime Ministry and Minister of the Education of South Korea. He was also awarded ICA Fellow, which is primarily a recognition of distinguished scholarly contributions at the International Communication Association Conference held in Paris in 2022. Jin has been interviewed by international media outlets, including Elle, New York Times, The Washington Post, NBC, The Guardian, The Vancouver Sun, Chicago Tribune, The Telegraph, Wired, LA Times, and China Daily as one of the world’s leading scholars on Korean pop culture and these subject matters.

Pan-Oceanian is the proposed unity of Oceania-inhabiting people or a concept that collectively classifies several aspects of Oceanian society. The earlier usages of the term were largely concerned with issues surrounding entomology and other branches of zoology and its derivatives based in Oceania. For example, it categorized the taxonomy or botany of both the onshore and offshore of the Australasia and the nearby Asia-Pacific regions. In subsequent usages, the term is idealized in a manner that connotes a separate continent and the cultural and societal consequences that entails. For example, some Pacific Islanders have indicated that there is a prevalence of depictions of their community that seems to fall in line with stereotypes that were prevalent during the colonial and imperial era. Subsequently some of these individuals have pushed towards a more inclusive representation of filmmakers and film scholars. In culture, the term is used as an umbrella term in instances where there is a significant overlap in the issues facing Oceanians and in similarities they share, such as with the staples taro and yam.

Pnina Werbner was a British social anthropologist. Her work focused on Sufi mysticism, diasporas, Muslim women and public sector unions in Botswana. She has written extensively about the Arab Spring. Werbner is married to anthropologist Richard Werbner, and is the niece of Max Gluckman.

Katharyne Mitchell is an American geographer who is currently a Distinguished Professor of Sociology and the Dean of the Social Sciences at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

References

  1. ↑ Rethinking Transnational Cinema: The Case of Tamil Cinema — Senses of Cinema
  2. ↑ Dennison, S. & Lim, S.H. (2006). Situating World Cinema as a Theoretical Problem. In Dennison, S & Lim, S. H. (eds). 'Remapping World Cinema: Identity, Culture and Politics in Film'. (pp.1-15) London & New York: Wallflower Press.
  3. 1 2 Ezra, E., & Rowden, T. (2006). Transnational Cinema: The Film Reader. London: Routledge
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 What Is Transnational Cinema? - Transnational Cinema & Online Culture
  5. 1 2 3 Higbee, Will & Lim Song Hwee. “Concepts of Transnational Cinema: Towards a Critical Transnationalism in Film Studies,” Transnational Cinema, vol. 1, no.1, 2010: 7-21
  6. 1 2 Higson, A. (2006). The Limiting Imagination of National Cinema. In Ezra, E. & Rowden, T. (eds.) 'Transnational Cinema, the Reader' (pp.15-26). Abingdon: Routledge.
  7. ↑ Shefrin, E. (2006). Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, and Participatory Fandom: Mapping New Congruencies Between the Internet and Media Entertainment Culture. In Ezra, E. & Rowden, T. (eds.) 'Transnational Cinema, the Reader' (pp.73-80). Abingdon: Routledge.
  8. ↑ Hjort, M. (Forthcoming, 2009). On the Plurality of Cinematic Transnationalism. In Newman, K & Durovicova, N . (eds.) 'World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives'. London: Routledge/American Film Institute Reader.
  9. ↑ Hess, J. & Zimmermann, P. (2006). Transnational Documentaries: An Introduction. In Ezra, E. & Rowden, T. (eds.) 'Transnational Cinema, the Reader' (pp.97-108). Abingdon: Routledge.
  10. 1 2 Radovic, Milja. Transnational Cinema and Ideology : Representing Religion, Identity and Cultural Myths (Taylor & Francis Group, 2014) 17.
  11. ↑ Radovic, Milja. Transnational Cinema and Ideology: Representing Religion, Identity and Cultural Myths (Taylor & Francis Group, 2014) 18.
  12. ↑ Radovic, Milja. Transnational Cinema and Ideology: Representing Religion, Identity and Cultural Myths (Taylor & Francis Group, 2014) 17.
  13. 1 2 3 Berry, Chris. “What Is Transnational Cinema? Thinking From The Chinese Situation,” Transnational Cinema, vol 1, no. 2, 2010: 114.
  14. ↑ Desai, Jigna. “Beyond Bollywood: The Cultural Politics of South Asian Diasporic Film.” Academia, 2004: 43
  15. ↑ Desai, Jigna. “Beyond Bollywood: The Cultural Politics of South Asian Diasporic Film.” Academia, 2004: 86
  16. 1 2 3 Yngvesson, Dag. “The Act of Humanism: Jagal, Preman Love and Economies of Truth.” Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia 15, no. 1 (2014): 212.
  17. ↑ Alcoff, Linda. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” Cultural Critique, no. 20, 1991–1992: 6
  18. 1 2 Alcoff, Linda. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” Cultural Critique, no. 20, 1991–1992: 7
  19. 1 2 The Attractive Empire: Transnational Film Culture in Imperial Japan - University Press Scholarship
  20. 1 2 Building Blocs - Nagata Masaicho and the Creation of Transnational Film Consensus in Cold War Asia|The Council on East Asian Studies at Yale University
  21. 1 2 Manifest Density: Decentering the Global Western Film
  22. ↑ Transnational Chinese Cinemas: Identity, Nationhood, Gender - available on JSTOR
  23. 1 2 The Uncanny Child in Transnational Cinema: Ghosts of Futurity at the Turn of the Twenty-first Century on JSTOR
  24. 1 2 How history and politics blazed a trail through East Asian cinema: Chinese transnational dreams|HERO magazine: A fresh perspective
  25. 1 2 3 4 Ethical Encounters: Teaching Transnational Cinema: Politics and Pedagogy, by Katarzyna Marciniak and Bruce Bennett (eds.) — Senses of Cinema
  26. ↑ The 25 Best Foreign Films of the Decade - The Ringer

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.