UDM v Speaker of the National Assembly

Last updated

UDM v Speaker of the National Assembly
Constitutional court of South Africa.jpeg
Court Constitutional Court of South Africa
Full case nameUnited Democratic Movement v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others
Decided22 June 2017 (2017-06-22)
Docket nos.CCT 89/17
Citation(s) [2017] ZACC 21; 2017 (8) BCLR 1061 (CC); 2017 (5) SA 300 (CC)
Court membership
Judges sitting Mogoeng CJ, Nkabinde ADJC, Cameron J, Froneman J, Jafta J, Khampepe J, Madlanga J, Mhlantla J, Zondo J, Mojapelo AJ and Pretorius AJ
Case opinions
The Speaker of the National Assembly has the constitutional power to prescribe a secret ballot in a parliamentary motion of no confidence in the President of the Republic.
Decision byMogoeng CJ (unanimous)
Keywords

United Democratic Movement v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others is a 2017 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on the purpose and procedure of parliamentary motions of no confidence in the President of the Republic of South Africa. In a unanimous judgment written by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, the court held that the Speaker of the National Assembly was empowered to prescribe a secret ballot in votes of no confidence.

Contents

Background and application

In the early hours of 31 March 2017, President Jacob Zuma announced a major reshuffle of his cabinet. Among those fired were respected Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan and his deputy, Mcebisi Jonas. Coming amid broader allegations of state capture in Zuma's administration, the cabinet reshuffle was met with an adverse reaction from the markets and from much of the public, including in the so-called Zuma Must Fall protests.

In this context, three opposition parties – the United Democratic Movement (UDM), the Democratic Alliance, and the Economic Freedom Fighters – approached the Speaker of the National Assembly, Baleka Mbete, with a request to schedule a motion of no confidence in the President, as provided for in section 102 of the Constitution. The motion was scheduled for debate in the National Assembly on 18 April 2017. [1] In the interim, the UDM wrote to the Speaker with the further request that the vote on the motion should be conducted by secret ballot. On 5 April, the Speaker refused, arguing that neither the Constitution nor the Rules of the National Assembly empowered her to order such a voting procedure in a motion of no confidence. [2]

In response, the UDM applied for direct access to the Constitutional Court of South Africa, where it sought judicial review of the Speaker's decision. [3] [4] Four lobby groups were admitted as amici curiae, and all political parties represented in the National Assembly were joined to the proceedings. Counsel for the litigants included Dali Mpofu for the UDM, [5] Tembeka Ngcukaitobi for the Economic Freedom Fighters, [6] and Anton Katz for Inkatha Freedom Party. [7] The matter was heard on 15 May 2017 and judgment was handed down on 22 June 2017. [8]

Judgment

In a unanimous judgment written by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, the Constitutional Court held that the Constitution does not provide for or require any express procedure for a vote of no confidence; either a secret ballot or an open ballot is permissible, at the discretion of the Speaker and in the public interest. The reason for this is section 57(1) of the Constitution, which grants the National Assembly the latitude to determine its own internal arrangements and rules "with due regard to representative and participatory democracy, accountability, transparency and public involvement". The court therefore set aside the Speaker's decision of 6 April, but it declined to prescribe a secret ballot; instead, it remitted the UDM's request for a secret ballot to the Speaker, who was to make a fresh determination in light of the ruling.

In the rest of its judgment, the court reflected on the purpose of motions of no confidence, which it construed as the "ultimate" means available to Parliament for exerting accountability over the executive. Given this purpose of accountability, the Speaker's choice among voting methods would be situation-dependent but should rationally include consideration inter alia of the competing imperatives of facilitating openness and transparency, on the one hand, and allowing Members of Parliament to exercise their vote "in accordance with [their] conscience, without undue influence, intimidation, or fear of disapproval", on the other hand.

Related Research Articles

The Republic of South Africa is a unitary parliamentary democratic republic. The President of South Africa serves both as head of state and as head of government. The President is elected by the National Assembly and must retain the confidence of the Assembly in order to remain in office. South Africans also elect provincial legislatures which govern each of the country's nine provinces.

A motion or vote of no confidence is a formal expression by a deliberative body as to whether an officeholder is deemed fit to continue to occupy their office. The no-confidence vote is a defining feature of parliamentary democracy which allows the elected parliament to either affirm their support or force the ousting of the cabinet. Systems differ in whether such a motion may be directed against the prime minister only or against individual cabinet ministers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional Court of South Africa</span> Supreme court of South Africa

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is a supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa, and is the apex court in the South African judicial system, with general jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baleka Mbete</span> South African politician

Baleka Mbete is a South African politician who was the Deputy President of South Africa from September 2008 to May 2009. She was also the Speaker of the National Assembly for two non-consecutive terms from 2004 to 2008 and from 2014 to 2019. A member of the African National Congress (ANC), she was first elected to the National Assembly in 1994 and stepped down from her seat in 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 South African general election</span>

General elections were held in South Africa on 22 April 2009 to elect members of the National Assembly and provincial legislatures. These were the fourth general elections held since the end of the apartheid era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dikgang Moseneke</span> South African judge

Dikgang Ernest Moseneke OLG is a South African judge and former Deputy Chief Justice of South Africa.

The Judicial Service Commission is a body specially constituted by the South African Constitution to recommend persons for appointment to the judiciary of South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mogoeng Mogoeng</span> Chief Justice of South Africa

Mogoeng Thomas Reetsang Mogoeng is a South African jurist who served as the Chief Justice of South Africa from 8 September 2011 until his retirement on 11 October 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">26th South African Parliament</span>

The 26th South African Parliament was the fifth Parliament of South Africa to convene since the introduction of non-racial government in South Africa in 1994. It was elected in the general election of 7 May 2014 and consists of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces. The National Assembly contains 400 members, while the National Council of Provinces contains 90 members. Members of Parliament were sworn in on 21 May 2014. The 26th parliament first convened on 21 May 2014 to elect Jacob Zuma as the fifth democratically elected President of South Africa. It was formally opened by president Zuma's State of the Nation Address in a joint sitting on 17 June 2014.

<i>Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly</i> South African legal case

Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others; Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others [2016] ZACC 11 is a major judgment of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which finds that President Jacob Zuma breached the South African Constitution by failing to implement the recommendations in the Public Protector's Nkandla report.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidency of Jacob Zuma</span> South African presidential administration from 2009 to 2018

Jacob Zuma's tenure as South Africa's fourth post-apartheid president began on 9 May 2009 and ended on 14 February 2018. He held office under a mandate from the parliamentary caucus of the African National Congress (ANC), which had governed South Africa since 1994 and which won comfortable majorities in the 2009 and 2014 national elections. His presidency was beset by controversy, and he faced, and defeated, an impeachment attempt and a record eight motions of no confidence in the South African Parliament, four of which went to a vote. His party asked him to resign in February 2018, ahead of the constitutional end of his second term.

The following lists events that happened during 2017 in South Africa.

The 54th National Conference of the African National Congress (ANC) took place from 16 to 20 December 2017 at the Johannesburg Expo Centre in Nasrec, Gauteng. At the conference, the ANC elected its National Executive Committee (NEC) and other top internal leaders. Often referred to as the Nasrec Conference, it was held during the centenary of the birth of former ANC President Oliver Tambo and was convened under the theme, "Remember Tambo: Towards Unity, Renewal and Radical Socioeconomic Transformation."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bongani Bongo</span> South African politician

Bongani Thomas Bongo is a South African politician, whose ANC membership is currently suspended pending the finalisation of a corruption case at the Nelspruit Magistrates Court. Bongo is the former Minister of State Security, a position to which he was appointed on 17 October 2017 by President Jacob Zuma until he was relieved from the post on 28 February 2018. He was the only appointment that had not been a cabinet minister before. He was also elected the President of the University of Limpopo's Alumni and Convocation Association. As the Minister of State Security, Bongo headed the State Security Agency of South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 South African presidential election</span>

A presidential election was held in the National Assembly in South Africa on 15 February 2018 following the resignation of Jacob Zuma on 14 February. Acting president Cyril Ramaphosa of the ruling African National Congress won the election unopposed due to no other party nominating a candidate. Ramaphosa was sworn in by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng at 5pm, 15 February 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tembeka Ngcukaitobi</span> South African lawyer (born 1976)

Tembeka Nicholas Ngcukaitobi is a South African lawyer and legal scholar. An advocate of the Johannesburg Bar since August 2010, he gained silk status in February 2020. He is currently a member of the Judicial Service Commission and a part-time member of the Competition Commission's Competition Tribunal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Cabinet of Cyril Ramaphosa</span> Second cabinet of Cyril Ramaphosa

The Second Cabinet of Cyril Ramaphosa was formed on 29 May 2019 after President Ramaphosa was inaugurated for his first full-term as President of South Africa following the African National Congress's victory in the 2019 South African general election. The newly appointed ministers were inaugurated the next day by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng at the Sefako Makgatho Presidential Guest House in Pretoria. The cabinet is the third cabinet in Africa to be made completely gender-equal in its composition and the first gender-equal cabinet in South African history.

Petrus Arnolus Koen is South African judge who is currently serving in the KwaZulu-Natal Division of the High Court of South Africa. Before joining the bench in November 2006, he was Senior Counsel in Pietermaritzburg. He is best known for presiding in the corruption trial of former President Jacob Zuma from May 2021 until he recused himself in January 2023.

<i>My Vote Counts v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services</i> South African legal case

My Vote Counts NPC v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Another is a decision in the Constitutional Court of South Africa which established a constitutional right of access to information about the sources of political party funding. The court held unanimously that the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 was inconsistent with the Constitution insofar as it failed to give effect to that right. The matter was heard on 13 March 2018 and decided on 21 June 2018, with a majority judgment written by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng.

References

  1. ↑ "ANC rejects 'mischievous' calls lobbying MPs to support Zuma no confidence motion". Sowetan. 6 April 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2024.
  2. ↑ Vos, Pierre de (11 April 2017). "Speaker Baleka Mbete vs the Secret Ballot – what the law says". Daily Maverick. Retrieved 19 January 2024.
  3. ↑ Banda, Tinenenji (1 May 2018). "United Democratic Movement v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others (CCT89/17) [2017] ZACC 21". SAIPAR Case Review. 1 (2). ISSN   2522-686X.
  4. ↑ Slade, Bradley BV (29 March 2021). "Reviewing the Speaker's Decision: A Brief Synopsis of UDM v Speaker of the National Assembly 2017 5 SA 300 (CC)". Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. 24: 1–20. doi:10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a8111. ISSN   1727-3781.
  5. ↑ "Justices ask Dali Mpofu why Constitutional Court should order a secret ballot". Business Day. 15 May 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2024.
  6. ↑ "Members of Parliament are entitled to vote according to their conscience: EFF". Sunday Times. 15 May 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2024.
  7. ↑ "Constitutional Court judges ask tough questions of parties in secret ballot case". Business Day. 15 May 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2024.
  8. ↑ "Concourt: Speaker has the powers to prescribe secret ballot". The Mail & Guardian. 22 June 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.