Uday Umesh Lalit | |
---|---|
49th Chief Justice of India | |
In office 27 August 2022 –8 November 2022 | |
President | Droupadi Murmu |
Preceded by | N. V. Ramana |
Succeeded by | Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud |
Judge of the Supreme Court of India | |
In office 13 August 2014 –26 August 2022 | |
Nominated by | Rajendra Mal Lodha |
Appointed by | Pranab Mukherjee |
Personal details | |
Born | Solapur,Bombay State (present-day Maharashtra),India | 9 November 1957
Spouse | Amita Lalit |
Parent | U.R. Lalit (father) |
Residence(s) | 5,Krishna Menon Marg,Sunehri Bagh,New Delhi,India [1] |
Uday Umesh Lalit (born 9 November 1957) is an Indian lawyer and former Supreme Court Judge,who served as the 49th Chief Justice of India. [2] Previously,he has served as a judge of Supreme Court of India. [3] Prior to his elevation as a judge of the supreme court,he practised as a senior advocate at the Supreme Court. [4] Justice Lalit is one of the eleven senior counsels who have been directly elevated to the Supreme Court. [5] [6] [7] He is currently ‘Distinguished Visiting Professor’at Ashank Desai Centre for Policy Studies,Indian Institute of Technology,Bombay and Distinguished Visiting Professor at West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences. [8] [9]
Lalit was born in Solapur to the family of U. R. Lalit,a former additional judge of the Bombay High Court Nagpur bench and a senior advocate practising at the Supreme Court of India. [10] His family hails from Konkan but moved to Solapur when his grandfather,Ranganath Lalit,began practicing law. [11] Ranganath Lalit chaired two separate civic receptions when Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru visited Solapur. [12] He is married to Amita Lalit. [13]
Lalit attended Haribhai Deokaran High School in Solapur and is a law graduate from the Government Law College,Mumbai. [11]
Lalit enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa as an advocate in June 1983. He started his practice with advocate M.A. Rane,who was considered a proponent of the radical humanist school of thought who believed that social work was as important as building a solid legal practice. [12] He shifted his practice to Delhi in 1985 and joined the chamber of senior advocate Pravin H. Parekh. From 1986 to 1992,Lalit worked with former Attorney General for India,Soli Sorabjee. [14] On 3 May 1992,Lalit qualified and was registered as an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court. [15] On 29 April 2004,Lalit was designated as a senior advocate of the Supreme Court. [16]
In 2011,a Supreme Court bench of Justices G. S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly appointed Lalit as the special public prosecutor for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the 2G spectrum cases,stating that "in the interest of a fair prosecution of the case,appointment of UU Lalit is eminently suitable". [17] His professional strengths are described as 'thoroughness with the case,patience in explaining legal questions and the sober demeanour in presenting the case before the bench. [18]
In July 2014,the Supreme court collegium headed by then Chief Justice of India Rajendra Mal Lodha recommended his elevation to the Supreme Court as a judge. [19] He was appointed as a judge on 13 August 2014 and became only the sixth lawyer to be directly elevated to the Supreme Court. [12]
In 2017,he was part of the five-judge bench in the case against the unconstitutional nature of triple talaq,then being practiced by Indian Muslim men to divorce their wives by uttering the word "talaq" (divorce) three times. Along with Lalit,J S Khehar,Kurian Joseph,R F Nariman,and Abdul Nazeer delivered the verdict banning the practice. [20]
On 10 January 2019,Justice Lalit recused himself from a five-judge bench constituted to hear the Ayodhya dispute case. His appearance for the erstwhile Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh Kalyan Singh in a 'connected case' was brought to the notice of the court by Rajeev Dhavan,and the court in its order noted the 'disinclination' of Justice Lalit to participate in the matter. [21] He has also recused himself from multiple other high-profile cases. [22]
In May 2021,he was part of a bench which denied bail to 2018 Bhima Koregaon violence accused activist Gautam Navlakha. [23]
He was part of the two-judge bench,along with Indu Malhotra,that upheld the Travancore royal family's right to administer the Padmanabhaswamy Temple on 13 July 2020. [24] [6] [12]
On 10 August 2022,the President of India Droupadi Murmu appointed him the 49th Chief Justice of India. He took oath as the chief justice on 27 August 2022 in the Rashtrapati Bhavan. He is the second direct appointee from the Bar to be appointed as the Chief Justice of India.
Chief Justice Lalit's tenure despite being short had brought major administrative changes to the court,a frantic pace of work with each bench of judges having to deal with 60-70 cases per day. Over the years Supreme Court's number of constitution bench judgements fell dramatically from an average of 134 in the 1960s to just 2 in 2021,this has led to 53 such critical constitutional cases being left unheard and pending. To reverse this trend Chief Justice U. U Lalit announced that a constitution bench would hear 25 constitutional cases on his first day of office, [25] and under his tenure at least one constitutional bench functioned everyday. The cases heard include the legality of the Citizenship Amendment Act,validity of demonetisation,setting up of regional benches of the supreme court,the declaring of Muslims as a socially and educationally backward community in Andhra Pradesh,right to a dignified death,protection of jallikattu,etc. [26] There had also been a decline in the pendency of cases from 70,301 on September 1 to 69,461 on October 1. [27] The supreme court began live streaming constitutional bench proceedings under his tenure. [28] By the end of his tenure,the supreme court disposed of 10,000 cases while 8,700 cases were freshly filed which had resulted in a slight decrease in the pendency of cases and the court had set up 6 constitution benches. [29]
Chief Justice Lalit could only recommend one new judge to the Supreme Court,thus his proposal to recommend four more judges to the court,to fill the vacancies in the court,failed to get approval of the collegium over procedural differences arising out of the proposal being sent by circulation instead of being presented in a face to face meeting,as the meeting scheduled on September 30 couldn't take place as one of its members Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud was busy hearing cases until 9:10 PM. [30] As per procedure the Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju wrote to the Chief Justice on October 7 almost a month before his retirement,asking for his recommendations for the appointment of his successor,by convention once this letter is sent the collegium freezes and no new decisions like induction of new judges will be taken until the appointment of next Chief Justice. [31] [32]
He was part of the dissenting opinion in the plea against the 103rd constitutional amendment which created 10% reservation for those designated to be part of the economically weaker section (EWS),the dissenting judges were of the view that the exclusion of SCs/STs,and OBCs from the quota was violation of equality and discriminatory,and that the judgement would act as a gateway to further infractions of the 50% ceiling set by the supreme court on reservation. [33]
The supreme court under his tenure gave pro-civil liberties judgements like giving bail to activist Teesta Setalvad and the journalist Sidheeq Kappan. However his role in the unprecedented urgent Saturday morning hearing of the appeal against the acquittal of UAPA accused G. N. Saibaba by the Bombay High Court came into question,as the chief justice being the "master of the roster" has the power to decide when cases are listed and which bench of judges hears them. [34]
The Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial authority and the highest court of the Republic of India. It is the final court of appeal for all civil and criminal cases in India. It also has the power of judicial review. The Supreme Court,which consists of the Chief Justice of India and a maximum of fellow 33 judges,has extensive powers in the form of original,appellate and advisory jurisdictions.
The Chief Justice of India (CJI) (ISO:Bhārat kēMukhya Nyāyādhīśa) is the chief judge of the Supreme Court of India and the highest-ranking officer of the Indian judiciary. The Constitution of India grants power to the President of India to appoint,as recommended by the outgoing chief justice in consultation with other judges,(as envisaged in Article 124 (2) of the Constitution) the next Chief Justice,who will serve until they reach the age of 65 or are removed by the constitutional process of impeachment.
Sarv Mittra Sikri was an Indian lawyer and judge who served as the 13th Chief Justice of India.
Sarosh Homi Kapadia was the 38th Chief Justice of India. He was the first chief justice born after the partition of India.
Altamas Kabir was an Indian lawyer and judge who served as the 39th Chief Justice of India.
Ranjan Gogoi is an Indian former advocate and judge who served as the 46th Chief Justice of India from 2018 to 2019,having previously served as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India from 2012 to 2018. He is currently a Member of the Rajya Sabha,having been nominated by President Ram Nath Kovind on 16 March 2020. Gogoi served as a judge in the Gauhati High Court from 2001 to 2010,and then was transferred as a judge to the Punjab and Haryana High Court from 2010 to 2011 where he later was the Chief Justice from 2011 to 2012. He is also a member of the Committee on External Affairs in the Rajya Sabha.
Dipak Misra is an Indian jurist who served as the 45th Chief Justice of India from 28 August 2017 till 2 October 2018. He is also former Chief Justice of the Patna High Court and Delhi High Court. He is the nephew of Justice Ranganath Misra,who was the 21st Chief Justice from 1990 to 1991.
Kuttiyil Mathew Joseph is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India;he retired on 16 June 2023. He is former chief justice of the Uttarakhand High Court. Before his appointment as chief justice of the High Court of Uttarakhand on 31 July 2014,he had served as a judge of the Kerala High Court for more than nine years.
The Indian Judicial Collegium system,where existing judges appoint judges to the nation's constitutional courts,has its genesis in,and continued basis resting on,three of its own judgments made by Supreme Court judges,which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases. The collegium system has often been alleged to have caste bias due to the lack of representation of marginalised communities,i.e.,OBCs,SCs and STs,in the Supreme Court and high courts.
Sharad Arvind Bobde is an Indian judge who served as the 47th Chief Justice of India from 18 November 2019 to 23 April 2021.
Nuthalapati Venkata Ramana is a former Indian judge and journalist who served as the 48th Chief Justice of India.
The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was a proposed body which would have been responsible for the recruitment,appointment and transfer of judicial officers,legal officers and legal employees under the government of India and in all state governments of India. The commission was established by amending the Constitution of India through the 99th constitution amendment with the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act,2014 or 99th Constitutional Amendment Act-2014 passed by the Lok Sabha on 13 August 2014 and by the Rajya Sabha on 14 August 2014. The NJAC would have replaced the collegium system for the appointment of judges as invoked by the Supreme Court via judicial fiat by a new system. Along with the Constitution Amendment Act,the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act,2014,was also passed by the Parliament of India to regulate the functions of the National Judicial Appointments Commission. The NJAC Bill and the Constitutional Amendment Bill,was ratified by 16 of the state legislatures in India,and subsequently assented by the President of India Pranab Mukherjee on 31 December 2014. The NJAC Act and the Constitutional Amendment Act came into force from 13 April 2015.
Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani is a former Indian judge and prosecutor,who last served as the chief justice of the Madras High Court. Previously,as a judge of the Bombay High Court,she notably upheld the conviction of several persons for the rape of a pregnant Muslim woman during the 2002 Gujarat riots,chastising investigative authorities for their inaction in the matter,and also refused parole for those convicted in the 1993 Bombay bombings. She retired in 2019,after refusing to accept a controversial transfer from the Madras High Court to the Meghalaya High Court.
Suryakant Sharma is an Indian judge of the Supreme Court of India,set to become the 53rd Chief Justice of India,if the convention of seniority is followed. Prior to his elevation as judge,Kant was a Senior Advocate and also served as the Advocate General for Haryana.
Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai is a judge of Supreme Court of India. He is a former judge of the Bombay High Court and currently serves as the chancellor of the Maharashtra National Law University,Nagpur.. Also,he is the ex officio executive chairman of National Legal Services Authority. He is set to become the 52nd Chief Justice of India if the seniority convention is followed.
Bengaluru Venkataramiah Nagarathna is a judge of the Supreme Court of India. She served as a judge of the Karnataka High Court from 2008 to 2021. Her father,E. S. Venkataramiah,was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India in 1989.
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha is a judge of the Supreme Court of India. He is former Additional Solicitor General of India. He is well known for his work on the Ayodhya Title Dispute and the BCCI cases.
Kalpathy Venkataraman Viswanathan is a judge of the Supreme Court of India.
{{cite news}}
: |last=
has generic name (help)