Triple talaq in India

Last updated

Triple talaq (instant divorce) [1] and talaq-e-mughallazah (irrevocable divorce) [2] are now banned means of Islamic divorce previously available to Muslims in India, especially adherents of Hanafi Sunni Islamic schools of jurisprudence. [3] [4] A Muslim man could legally divorce his wife by proclaiming three times consecutively the word talaq (the Arabic word for "divorce") (in spoken, written or, more recently, electronic form).


The use and status of triple talaq in India has been a subject of controversy and debate. Those questioning the practice have raised issues of justice, gender equality, human rights and secularism. The debate has involved the Government of India and the Supreme Court of India, and is connected to the debate about a uniform civil code (Article 44) in India. [5] On 22 August 2017, the Indian Supreme Court deemed instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddah) unconstitutional. [6] [7] [8] Three of the five judges in the panel concurred that the practice of triple talaq is unconstitutional. [9] The remaining two declared the practice to be constitutional. [10] Three of India's neighbouring countries — Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka — are among the 23 countries worldwide that have banned triple talaq. [11] The Quran established means to avoid hasty divorces. [12] It prescribes two waiting periods of three months before the divorce is final in order to give the husband time to reconsider his decision. [12] On 30 July 2019, the Parliament of India declared the practice of Triple Talaq illegal and unconstitutional and made it a punishable act from 1 August 2019. [13]

However, Muslim men are still allowed to be polygamous and can also give a divorce easily by paying paltry sums. [14]

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 passed on 26 July 2019 after a very long discussion and opposition finally got the verdict (the Indian Supreme Court judgement of August 2017 described below) to all women. It made triple talaq illegal in India on 1 August 2019, replacing the triple talaq ordinance promulgated in February 2019. It stipulates that instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) in any form – spoken, written, or by electronic means such as email or SMS – is illegal and void, with up to three years in jail for the husband. Under the new law, an aggrieved woman is entitled to demand maintenance for her dependent children. [15]

The Government first introduced the bill to Parliament on 22 August 2017. [16] MPs from Rashtriya Janata Dal, All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen, Biju Janata Dal, All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Indian National Congress and All India Muslim League opposed the bill. Several Opposition lawmakers called for it to be sent to a select committee for scrutiny. It was passed on 28 December 2017 by the Lok Sabha, or lower house of the Indian Parliament, where the ruling BJP held the majority of seats. [17] [18] [19]

In a major political win for the Modi government, the Rajya Sabha, or upper house of Parliament, where the ruling NDA did not have a majority, approved the bill (99–84) on 30 July 2019 after a lengthy debate. [20]

The bill followed a 2017 Supreme Court ruling that the practice of instant triple talaq is unconstitutional and a divorce pronounced by uttering talaq three times in one sitting is void and illegal.

Muslim triple talaq petitioner Ishrat Jahan welcomed the Bill when it was presented. Also Arif Mohammad Khan welcomed and appreciated the decision taken by Government and Parliament of India. [21]

The triple talaq bill proposed by the previous Modi government lapsed when an election was called and the Lok Sabha was dissolved before the bill was sent to the Rajya Sabha for approval.


Triple talaq is a form of divorce that was practised in Islam, whereby a Muslim man could legally divorce his wife by pronouncing talaq (the Arabic word for divorce) three times. The pronouncement could be oral or written, or, in recent times, delivered by electronic means such as telephone, SMS, email or social media. The man did not need to cite any cause for the divorce and the wife need not have been present at the time of pronouncement. After a period of iddat , during which it was ascertained whether the wife is pregnant, the divorce became irrevocable. [22] [23] In the recommended practice, a waiting period was required before each pronouncement of talaq, during which reconciliation was attempted. However, it had become common to make all three pronouncements in one sitting. While the practice was frowned upon, it was not prohibited. [24] A divorced woman could not remarry her divorced husband unless she first married another man, a practice called nikah halala .

The practice of talaq-e-biddat is said to have been around since the period of Caliph Umar, more than 1400 years ago. [25] [26] [ page needed ] The Supreme Court described it as "manifestly arbitrary" and said that it allows a man to "break down [a] marriage whimsically and capriciously". [27]

Instant divorce is termed talaq-e-bid'at. A hadith by An-Nasa'i stated that Muhammad had accused a man of mocking the Quran by uttering divorce thrice in one go. Talaq pronounced thrice simultaneously from Muhammad to the first two years of Umar's reign as caliph was only considered as a single divorce according to Sahih Muslim. The latter however allowed it, upon seeing the people did not observe the iddah, but also had men using such divorce flogged. [28] [29]

Abu Hanifa and Malik ibn Anas considered it irrevocable despite its illegality. Al-Shafi'i considered it permissible but Ahmad ibn Hanbal considered it to be invalid. [28]

Triple talaq is not mentioned in the Quran. It is also largely disapproved by Muslim legal scholars. Many Islamic nations have barred the practice, including Pakistan and Bangladesh, although it is technically legal in Sunni Islamic jurisprudence. Triple talaq, in Islamic law, is based upon the belief that the husband has the right to reject or dismiss his wife with good grounds. [30] [31]

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), a non-governmental organisation, had told the Supreme Court that women could also pronounce triple talaq, and could execute nikahnamas that stipulated conditions so that the husbands could not pronounce triple talaq. [32] According to AIMPLB, "Sharia grants right to divorce to husbands because Islam grants men a greater power of decision-making." [33]


Muslim family affairs in India are governed by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (often called the "Muslim Personal Law"). It was one of the first acts to be passed after the Government of India Act 1935 became operational, introducing provincial autonomy and a form of dyarchy at the federal level. It replaced the so-called "Anglo-Mohammedan Law" previously operating for Muslims, and became binding on all of India's Muslims. [34] [35]

The sharia is open to interpretation by the ulama (class of Muslim legal scholars). The ulama of Hanafi Sunnis considered this form of divorce binding, provided the pronouncement was made in front of Muslim witnesses and later confirmed by a sharia court. However, the ulama of Ahl-i Hadith, Twelver and Musta'li persuasions did not regard it as proper. Scholar Aparna Rao states that, in 2003, there was an active debate among the ulama. [23]

In traditional Islamic jurisprudence, triple talaq is considered to be a particularly disapproved, but legally valid, form of divorce. [36] Changing social conditions around the world have led to increasing dissatisfaction with traditional Islamic law of divorce since the early 20th century and various reforms have been undertaken in different countries. [37] Contrary to practices adopted in most Muslim-majority countries, Muslim couples in India are not required to register their marriage with civil authorities. [38] Muslim marriages in India are considered to be a private matter, unless the couple decided to register their marriage under the Special Marriage Act of 1954. [38] Owing to these historical factors, the checks that have been placed on the husband's unilateral right of divorce by governments of other countries and the prohibition of triple talaq were not implemented in India. [38]



The practice faced opposition from Muslim women, [39] some of whom filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court against the practice, terming it "regressive". [40] The petitioners asked for section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, [upper-alpha 1] to be scrapped, describing it as being against Article 14 of the Constitution (equality before the law). [42]

On 13 May 2017, during the hearings before its final judgment, the Supreme Court described instant triple talaq as the "worst form of marriage dissolution". It noted that the custom is banned in the Muslim-majority countries of Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. [5] [43] On 8 December 2016, the Allahabad High Court observed in a ruling that the practice of instant triple talaq was unconstitutional and violated the rights of Muslim women. [44] [45]

In March 2017, over 1 million Indian Muslims, a majority of whom were women, signed a petition to end instant triple talaq. The petition was started by the Muslim Rashtriya Manch, an Islamic organisation affiliated to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. [46] The petitioners against instant triple talaq have given evidence showing how instant triple talaq is simply an innovation that does not have much to do with Quranic beliefs. This is supported by the interpretation of Quranic text by many Islamic scholars, historical evidence and legal precedent. [47]

On 10 May 2017, senior cleric Maulana Syed Shahabuddin Salafi Firdausi denounced triple talaq and nikah halala , calling them un-Islamic practices and instruments to oppress women. [48] [49] The practice was also opposed by Hindu nationalists and Muslim liberals. [50] Congress leader Kapil Sibal tweeted: "Absence of consensus in Court makes it more difficult to forge consensus within communities. Glad that Court set aside a 'sinful' practice." [51] [52] However, Sibal also made statements supporting triple talaq (see the following section).

Over the year women organisations like Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan and several others opposed this practice in particular and further demanded more reforms in Muslim personal laws. [53] [54] [55] [56]


Triple talaq has been supported by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), a non-governmental body that supervises the application of Muslim personal law. It believes that the State does not have the right to intervene in religious matters. The AIMPLB's lawyer Kapil Sibal had said that though instant talaq can be thought of as a sin by some, but that "setting the validity of customs and practices of a community is a slippery slope". [57] Kapil Sibal cited Article 371A to state that even the Constitution does intend to protect matters of practice, tradition and customs of communities. [58] However, Sibal has also made statements opposing the practice (see previous section).

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) defends the practice. [40] In April 2017, citing a report prepared by Muslim Mahila Research Kendra in co-ordination with Shariah Committee for Women, AIMPLB claimed that Muslims have a lower rate of divorce compared to other religious communities, countering the argument that Muslims have the highest number of divorces in the country due to the practice of triple talaq. It also claimed that it had received forms from 35 million Muslim women across the country, supporting shariat and triple talaq. [59] [60] [61]

AIMPLB issued a code of conduct in April 2017 regarding talaq in response to the controversy over the practice of triple talaq. It warned that those who divorce for reasons not prescribed under shariat will be socially boycotted, in addition to calling for boycott of those who use triple talaq recklessly and without justification. [62] It also stated that it should be delivered in three sittings with a gap of at least one month each. [63]


The case was called Shayara Bano v. Union of India & Others. [64] [65] The bench that heard the controversial triple talaq case in 2017 was made up of multifaith members. The five judges from five different communities are Chief Justice JS Khehar (a Sikh), and Justices Kurian Joseph (a Christian), RF Nariman (a Parsi), UU Lalit (a Hindu) and Abdul Nazeer (a Muslim). [66]

The Supreme Court examined whether Triple talaq has the protection of the constitution—if this practice is safeguarded by Article 25(1) in the constitution that guarantees all the fundamental right to "profess, practice and propagate religion". The Court wanted to establish whether or not triple talaq is an essential feature of Islamic belief and practice. [67]

In a 397-page ruling, though two judges upheld validity of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat), the three other judges held that it was unconstitutional, thus barring the practice by a 3–2 majority. [68] [67] [69] One judge argued that instant triple talaq violated Islamic law. [68] The bench asked the central government to promulgate legislation within six months to govern marriage and divorce in the Muslim community. [70] The court said that until the government formulates a law regarding instant triple talaq, there would be an injunction against husbands pronouncing instant triple talaq on their wives. [71] [72]

According to The Economist , "Constitutional experts said [the judges] legal reasoning fell short of upholding personal rights over religious laws", whilst noting "The judgment did not ban other forms of Muslim divorce that favour men, only the instant kind." [50]


The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017

The Government formulated a bill and introduced it in the Parliament after 100 cases of instant triple talaq in the country since the Supreme Court judgement in August 2017. [73] On 28 December 2017, the Lok Sabha passed The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017. [74] The bill was planned to make instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddah) in any form — spoken, in writing or by electronic means such as email, SMS and WhatsApp illegal and void, with up to three years in jail for the husband. MPs from RJD, AIMIM, BJD, AIADMK, and AIML opposed the bill, calling it arbitrary in nature and a faulty proposal, while Congress supported the Bill tabled in the Lok Sabha by law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad. [18] [75] 19 amendments were moved in the Lok Sabha but all were rejected.

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance, 2018

On the grounds that practice of instant triple talaq was continuing unabated despite the SC striking it, the government issued an ordinance to make the practice illegal and void. [76]

The provisions of the ordinance are as follows: [77]

The ordinance was cleared by the President on 19 September 2018. [78]

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2018

As the triple talaq ordinance of 2018 was to expire on 22 January 2019, the government introduced a fresh bill in the Lok Sabha on 17 December 2018 to replace the ordinance. [79] [80]

The provisions of the bill are as follows: [81] [80]

The bill was passed by Lok Sabha on 27 December 2018. [17] However, the bill remained stuck in the Rajya Sabha due to the opposition's demand to send it to a select committee. [82] [83]

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance, 2019

As the triple talaq ordinance of 2018 was to expire on 22 January 2019 and also because the triple talaq bill of 2018 could not be passed in the parliament session, the government repromulgated the ordinance on 10 January 2019. [84] [85] On 12 January 2019, the president of India Ram Nath Kovind approved the ordinance of 2019. [86] [87]

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 became law on 31 July 2019, replacing the earlier ordinance. [88] [89] [90] [91]

See also


  1. Section 2 in The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 states about Application of Personal law to Muslims, "Notwithstanding any custom or usage to the contrary, in all questions (save questions relating to agricultural land) regarding intestate succession, special property of females, including personal property inherited or obtained under contract or gift or any other provision of Personal Law, marriage, dissolution of marriage, including talaq, ila, zihar, lian, khula and mubaraat, maintenance, dower, guardianship, gifts, trusts and trust properties, and wakfs (other than charities and charitable institutions and charitable and religious endowments) the rule of decision in cases where the parties are Muslims shall be the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat)." [41]

Related Research Articles

Uniform Civil Code is a proposal in India to formulate and implement personal laws of citizens which apply on all citizens equally regardless of their religion, sex, gender and sexual orientation. Currently, personal laws of various communities are governed by their religious scriptures. Implementation of a uniform civil code across the nation is one of the contentious promises pursued by India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. It is an important issue regarding secularism in Indian politics and continues to remain disputed by India's political left wing, Muslim groups and other conservative religious groups and sects in defence of sharia and religious customs. Personal laws are distinguished from public law and cover marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption and maintenance. Meanwhile, article 25-28 of the Indian constitution guarantees religious freedom to Indian citizens and allows religious groups to maintain their own affairs, article 44 of the constitution expects the Indian state to apply directive principles and common law for all Indian citizens while formulating national policies.

<i>Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum</i>

Mohd. Ahmad Khan v. Shah Bano Begum [1985 (1) SCALE 767 = 1985 (3) SCR 844 = 1985 (2) SCC 556 = AIR 1985 SC 945], commonly referred to as the Shah Bano case, was a controversial maintenance lawsuit in India, in which the Supreme Court delivered a judgment favouring maintenance given to an aggrieved divorced Muslim woman. Then the Congress government enacted a law with its most controversial aspect being the right to maintenance for the period of iddat after the divorce, and shifting the onus of maintaining her to her relatives or the Waqf Board. It was seen as discriminatory as it denied right to basic maintenance available to Muslim women under secular law.

Law of India Overview of the law of India

The law of India refers to the system of law across the Indian nation. India maintains a hybrid legal system with a mixture of civil, common law and customary, Islamic ethics, or religious law within the legal framework inherited from the colonial era and various legislation first introduced by the British are still in effect in modified forms today. Since the drafting of the Indian Constitution, Indian laws also adhere to the United Nations guidelines on human rights law and the environmental law.

Nikah halala

Nikah halala, also known as tahleel marriage, is a practice in which a woman, after being divorced by triple talaq, marries another man, consummates the marriage, and gets divorced again in order to be able to remarry her former husband. Nikah means marriage and halala means to make something halal, or permissible. This form of marriage is haram (forbidden) according to the hadith of Islamic prophet Muhammad. Nikah halala is practiced by a small minority of Muslims, mainly in countries that recognise the triple talaq.

Divorce in Islam Divorce in Islamic culture

Divorce in Islam can take a variety of forms, some initiated by the husband and some initiated by the wife. The main traditional legal categories are talaq (repudiation), khulʿ, judicial divorce and oaths. The theory and practice of divorce in the Islamic world have varied according to time and place. Historically, the rules of divorce were governed by sharia, as interpreted by traditional Islamic jurisprudence, though they differed depending on the legal school, and historical practices sometimes diverged from legal theory. In modern times, as personal status (family) laws were codified, they generally remained "within the orbit of Islamic law", but control over the norms of divorce shifted from traditional jurists to the state.

Arif Mohammad Khan 22nd Governor of Kerala

Arif Mohammad Khan is an Indian politician who is currently serving as the Governor of Kerala. He is a former Union Minister. He has held several portfolios ranging from energy to civil aviation.

All India Muslim Personal Law Board Indian non-government legal organization

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) is a non-government organisation constituted in 1973 by that time Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi to adopt suitable strategies for the protection and continued applicability of Muslim Personal Law in India, most importantly, the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937, providing for the application of the Islamic Law Code of Shariat to Muslims in India in personal affairs. The Act applies to all matters of personal law except such successions. Even this section had the right under laws such as the Cutchi Memons Act, 1920 and the Mahomedan Inheritance Act to opt for "Mahomedan Law". Faizur Rahman claims that a majority of Muslim followed Muslim law, not the Hindu civil code.

Ravi Shankar Prasad Indian politician and lawyer

Ravi Shankar Prasad is an Indian politician and lawyer, from the Bharatiya Janata Party. A Member of Parliament since 2000, first in the Rajya Sabha (2000-2019) and then in the Lok Sabha, Prasad has served as Union Minister multiple times: As Minister of State, he served in the ministries of Coal (2001-2003), Law and Justice (2002-2003), and Information and Broadcasting (2003-2004) under Atal Bihari Vajpayee's premiership; as Cabinet Minister, he held the Law and Justice, Communications, and Electronics and Information Technology (2014-2021) portfolios under Narendra Modi's premiership.

India does not recognise same-sex marriage or civil unions. The Delhi High Court is currently hearing multiple petitions which seek to legalize same-sex marriage in India.

Meenakshi Lekhi Indian politician

Meenakshi Lekhi is an Indian politician and the current Minister of State for External Affairs and Culture of India from 7 July 2021. She is a Member of Parliament from New Delhi Parliamentary constituency in the 16th and 17th Lok Sabha from the Bharatiya Janata Party. She is also a lawyer in the Supreme Court of India.

Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan or BMMA is an autonomous, secular, rights-based mass organization led by Zakia Soman which fights for the citizenship rights of the Muslim women in India. The BMMA was formed in January 2011. The organisation is based in Mumbai.

Lily Thomas was an Indian lawyer who initiated improvement and change to existing laws by filing petitions in India's highest court and regional courts. Thomas' petitions resulted in changes to laws to prevent convicted politicians getting elected, the addition of a new marriage law and protections for parliamentarians. Thomas was hailed most notably for petitioning to amend the Representation of the People Act.

The following is a timeline of the Premiership of Narendra Modi from his inauguration as Prime Minister of India on 26 May 2014 till now. The following are the highlights of the major events that took place under his premiership.

Lubna Sarwath is an Indian social activist and economist who fought the 2014 Indian general election from Hyderabad as Aam Aadmi Party candidate.

Mohsin Raza is an Indian politician from the state of Uttar Pradesh. He is the Minister of State for Minority Welfare Muslim Waqf and Hajj of the state in the Yogi Adityanath ministry.

Siddiqullah Chowdhury Indian politician

Siddiqullah Chowdhury is an Indian politician from the state of West Bengal. He is the representative of Manteswar constituency in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly as a member of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) party. He is also the president of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind's West Bengal branch.

All the Muslims in India are governed by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. This law deals with marriage, succession, inheritance and charities among Muslims. The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 deals with the circumstances in which Muslim women can obtain divorce and rights of Muslim women who have been divorced by their husbands and to provide for related matters. These laws are not applicable in the state of Goa, where Goa civil code is applicable for all persons irrespective of religion. These laws are not applicable to Muslims who married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019

The Muslim Women Act, 2019 is an Act of the Parliament of India criminalising triple talaq. In August 2017, the Supreme Court of India declared triple talaq, which enables Muslim men to instantly divorce their wives, to be unconstitutional. The minority opinion suggested the Parliament to consider appropriate legislation governing triple talaq in the Muslim community.

Nida Khan is a prominent women's rights activist in India. After her personal experiences in dealing with triple talaq, she was encouraged to fight for the rights of Muslim women. In addition, she also fights for the rights of women who have become victim to the practice called Nikah Halala. A fatwa was issued by a Shahar Imam Mufti Khurshid Alam calling for social boycott of Khan for speaking out against Islamic practices.

Yasoob Abbas Indian Muslim scholar

Mohammad Maulana Yasoob Abbas is an Islamic cleric and speaker of All India Shia Personal Law Board (AISPLB). He is a member of the India Islamic Culture Centre, Delhi and Shia College, Lucknow.


  1. "Triple Talaq verdict: What exactly is instant divorce practice banned by court". Hindustan Times. 22 August 2017. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
  2. Mohammed Siddique Patel. "The different methods of Islamic separation – Part 2: The different types of Talaq". Retrieved 29 May 2017.
  3. "Hanafi jurisprudence sanctions triple talaq". The Times of India .
  4. "Law, morality, triple talaq". 10 July 2017.
  5. 1 2 "Triple Talaq". The Times of India. 13 May 2017. Retrieved 13 May 2017.
  6. "The Triple Talaq Case - Supreme Court Observer". Supreme Court Observer. Archived from the original on 27 February 2018. Retrieved 27 February 2018.
  7. "Supreme Court scraps instant triple talaq: Here's what you should know about the practice". Hindustan Times. 22 August 2017. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
  8. Pratap Bhanu Mehta (23 August 2017). "Small step, no giant leap". The Indian Express. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
  9. "Triple Talaq: Ban this un-Islamic practice and bring in a uniform civil code". 22 November 2017.
  10. "Triple talaq verdict LIVE updates: Jaitley says SC judgment a great victory and welcome step". The Indian Express. 22 August 2017.
  11. "India's Muslim neighbours among 23 countries that have banned triple talaq". Hindustan Times. 19 September 2020. Retrieved 22 December 2020.
  12. 1 2 Harald Motzki (2006). "Marriage and divorce". In Jane Dammen McAuliffe (ed.). Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. Vol. 3. Brill. p. 279.
  13. "'Historic' day as India outlaws 'triple talaq' Islamic instant divorce". The Guardian .
  14. "If triple talaq can be challenged, why can't polygamy?". Hindustan Times. 24 August 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  15. "President Ram Nath Kovind gives assent to triple talaq Bill". The Hindu. 1 August 2019. Retrieved 25 August 2019.
  16. Phukan, Sandeep (28 December 2017). "Lok Sabha passes triple talaq bill". The Hindu.
  17. 1 2 "Lok Sabha debates bill 'criminalising' instant triple talaq: Who said what". The Times of India. 27 December 2018. Retrieved 27 December 2018.
  18. 1 2 Sharma, Sandipan (28 December 2017). "Congress' backing of triple talaq bill indicates it's gradually withdrawing from Muslim appeasement politics". Firstpost. Retrieved 22 August 2019.
  19. "Congress backs triple talaq bill, Khurshid strikes discordant note". The Economic Times . 28 December 2017.
  20. "Triple Talaq Bill Passed in Rajya Sabha". India Today. Retrieved 30 July 2019.
  21. "Triple Talaq Petitioner Ishrat Jahan Welcomes Bill, Joins BJP". Retrieved 16 August 2019.
  22. Choudhury, (Mis)Appropriated Liberty (2008), pp. 72–73.
  23. 1 2 Rao, Kinship, Descent Systems and State – South Asia (2003), p. 341.
  24. Choudhury, (Mis)Appropriated Liberty (2008), p. 95.
  25. "SC strikes down 1400-year-old Islamic practice of Triple talaq". Outlook. 22 August 2017.
  26. "Shayara Bano v Union of India".
  27. "'Not part of Islam': 5 quotes from verdict banning Triple talaq". NDTV.
  28. 1 2 Baderin, Mashooda (5 July 2017). Issues in Islamic Law, Volume 2. ISBN   9781351561938.
  29. Bulugh al-Mahram. Darussalam. p. 344.
  30. "What is Triple talaq divorce? India rules against instant termination of marriage in win for women's rights". Newsweek.
  31. Stacey, Kiran (22 August 2017). "India supreme court bans Islamic 'instant divorce'". Financial Times.
  32. "Women can say triple talaq, Muslim law board tells Supreme Court". The Times of India. 17 May 2017.
  33. "Women can say Triple talaq, Muslim law board tells Supreme Court". Times of India. 17 May 2017.
  34. Mukhopadhyay, Construction of Gender Identity (1994), p. 61.
  35. Murshid, Inheritance: Contemporary Practice – South Asia (2003), p. 304.
  36. Esposito & Delong-Bas, Women in Muslim Family Law (2001), pp. 30–31.
  37. Schacht, J., and Layish, A. (2000). "Ṭalāḳ". In P. Bearman; Th. Bianquis; C. E. Bosworth; E. van Donzel; W. P. Heinrichs (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. 10 (2nd ed.). Brill. p. 155.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  38. 1 2 3 Esposito & Delong-Bas, Women in Muslim Family Law (2001), pp. 111–112.
  39. Dutt, Barkha (5 May 2017). "What India's liberals get wrong about women and sharia law". The Washington Post .
  40. 1 2 "Lucknow: Muslim Personal Law Board to discuss Ayodhya dispute, triple talaq on Saturday", Hindustan Times , 14 April 2017, retrieved 22 August 2019
  41. "Section 2 in The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937". Indian Kanoon. Retrieved 23 August 2017.PD-icon.svgThis article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  42. Thakur, Pradeep (23 January 2017). "Triple Talaq: Law panel studies practices of Muslim nations". The Times of India .
  43. Soni, Anusha (12 May 2017). "Triple talaq undesirable, worst form of dissolution of marriage among Muslims: Supreme Court". India Today. Retrieved 22 August 2019.
  44. "Allahabad High Court calls triple talaq unconstitutional, says no personal law board is above Constitution". India Today. 8 December 2016. Retrieved 21 April 2017.
  45. Rashid, Omar (8 December 2016). "'Triple talaq' a cruel and most demeaning form of divorce practised by Muslim community: HC". The Hindu. Retrieved 21 April 2017.
  46. Suri, Manveena (17 March 2017). "Triple talaq: 1 million Indian Muslims sign petition against divorce practice". CNN. Retrieved 22 May 2017.
  47. "The case against Triple talaq". Livemint. 16 May 2017.
  48. "Muslim scholars support ban on triple talaq, polygamy". DNA. 10 May 2017. Retrieved 6 June 2017.
  49. "Cleric: Triple talaq is a mockery of Islam". The Times of India. 10 May 2017. Retrieved 6 June 2017.
  50. 1 2 "India bans a Muslim practice of instant divorce". The Economist . 26 August 2017.
  51. Ghosh, Pallavi (23 August 2017). "Kapil Sibal epitomises oppositions dilemma on Triple talaq verdict". News18. Retrieved 22 August 2019.
  52. Sibal, Kapil [@KapilSibal] (23 August 2017). "Absence of consensus in Court makes it more difficult to forge consensus within communities. Glad that Court set aside a 'sinful' practice" (Tweet). Retrieved 22 August 2019 via Twitter.
  53. IANS (10 August 2017). "Triple Talaq: Muslim women trust Supreme Court, says NGO". Business Standard India. Retrieved 21 January 2020.
  54. "Muslim women's body seeks Uniform Civil Code, to write to Modi government". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 21 January 2020.
  55. Nelanshu Shukla (10 July 2018). "Muslim women demand for reforms in personal laws". India Today. Retrieved 21 January 2020.
  56. Arya, Divya (22 August 2017). "The women who fought instant divorce". BBC News. Retrieved 21 January 2020.
  57. Prabhu, Sunil (22 August 2017). Dutta Roy, Divyanshu (ed.). "Kapil Sibal In Court Opposed Ending Triple Talaq. His Reaction To The Ban". NDTV.
  58. Mahapatra, Dhananjay (17 May 2017). "Women can say Triple talaq, Muslim law board tells Supreme Court". Times of India.
  59. Khan, Shoeb (10 April 2017). "Muslims have lower divorce rate than other groups". The Times of India. Retrieved 21 April 2017.
  60. PTI (10 April 2017). "Muslim community has a low rate of divorce". The Hindu. Retrieved 21 April 2017.
  61. "Divorce rate among Muslims low compared to other communities". India Today. 8 April 2017. Retrieved 21 April 2017.
  62. Shaurya, Surabhi (17 April 2017). "Triple Talaq: All India Muslim Personal Law Board issues code of conduct; here's what it says".
  63. Bajpai, Namita (16 April 2017). "All India Muslim Personal Law Board announces code of conduct for triple talaq". The New Indian Express.
  64. "Shayara Bano & Others Vs. Union of India & Others on 22 August, 2017 - Legitquest". Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  65. [ bare URL ]
  66. "Triple talaq validity case: All you need to know". The Times of India. 22 August 2017.
  67. 1 2 "Triple talaq verdict has not gone the entire distance". Livemint. 25 August 2017.
  68. 1 2 "Recent court rulings in India suggest justice is improving". The Economist . 31 August 2017.
  69. "Triple Talaq declared invalid by Supreme Court – Lexspeak". Lexspeak. 23 August 2017. Retrieved 23 August 2017.
  70. Mahapatra, Dhananjay (22 August 2017). "Supreme Court declares triple talaq unconstitutional, strikes it down by 3:2 majority". The Times of India.
  71. "Injunction on husbands pronouncing triple talaq until law is made: SC advocate". Business Standard. 22 August 2017.
  72. "This Is What Supreme Court Said in Triple Talaq Judgment". 22 August 2017.
  73. "100 cases of instant triple talaq in the country since the SC judgement". The Times of India . 28 December 2017.
  74. Phukan, Sandeep (28 December 2017). "Lok Sabha passes triple talaq bill". The Hindu.
  75. "Congress backs triple talaq bill, Khurshid strikes discordant note". The Economic Times. 28 December 2017.
  76. "President Promulgates Triple Talaq Ordinance[Read Ordinance]". 20 September 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
  77. "Triple talaq passed. What are the provisions". Indian Express Website. 19 September 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
  78. "President signs instant triple talaq ordinance". Times of India Website. 19 September 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
  79. Kaushal, Pradeep (18 December 2018). "Fresh triple talaq Bill introduced in Lok Sabha". Indian Express Website. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  80. 1 2 "THE MUSLIM WOMEN (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ON MARRIAGE) BILL, 2018" (PDF). Lok Sabha India Website. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
  81. "2018 Bill Provisions". PRS India Website. Retrieved 2 January 2019.
  82. "Triple talaq bill in Rajya Sabha on Monday; Congress, others set to oppose". The Times of India. 30 December 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
  83. "Triple talaq bill stuck in Rajya Sabha". The Times of India. 9 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  84. "Cabinet approves re-promulgation of triple talaq Ordinance- Economic Times". The Economic Times. 10 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  85. "Cabinet approves re-promulgation of triple talaq Ordinance". News18. 10 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  86. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  87. "President Kovind approves ordinance to criminalise triple talaq". India Today. 12 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  88. "Lok Sabha passes instant triple talaq bill". Economic Times. 26 July 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  89. "Triple talaq bill passed in Rajya Sabha". India Today. 30 July 2019. Retrieved 30 July 2019.
  90. "Fresh triple talaq Bill introduced in Lok Sabha". Indian Express Website. 21 June 2019. Retrieved 31 July 2019.
  91. "THE MUSLIM WOMEN (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ON MARRIAGE)BILL, 2019" (PDF). Lok Sabha India Website. Retrieved 30 July 2019.