Unitary patent (Switzerland and Liechtenstein)

Last updated
Patent Treaty of December 22, 1978
Treaty between the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on Patent Protection
Signed22 December 1978 (1978-12-22)
Location Vaduz
Effective1 April 1980
ExpirationConcluded for an unlimited period of time. [1]
Signatories2
Parties2
LanguageGerman [2]

The unitary patent for Switzerland and Liechtenstein is a patent having a unitary character over the territories of Switzerland and Liechtenstein. It can either be a national patent, or a European patent granted under the European Patent Convention (EPC) and having a unitary character pursuant to Article 142(1) EPC. [3] The unitary patent "may only be granted, transferred, annulled or lapse in respect of the whole territory of protection," i.e. for both Switzerland and Liechtenstein. [4]

Contents

The special agreement establishing this unitary patent is the Treaty between the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on Patent Protection of 22 December 1978, which entered into force on 1 April 1980. This special agreement is also a regional patent agreement within the meaning of Article 45 PCT. [5] Amongst the bilateral treaties concluded between Switzerland and Liechtenstein in the field of patents, the Patent Treaty of 22 December 1978 is considered to be the most important one. [6]

A European patent may only be granted jointly in respect of Switzerland and Liechtenstein, following a joint designation under Article 149 EPC. [5] [7] The unitary patent for Switzerland and Liechtenstein was the only unitary patent under Article 142(1) EPC in force until 2023, [8] when the unitary patent (applicable in 17 EU member states) regulation entered into force.

Background

Patents granted under the European Patent Convention (EPC) are called European patents. [9] Those are granted following a unified grant procedure based on a single patent application, in one language. After grant however, a European patent is not a unitary right, but becomes a bundle of essentially independent nationally-enforceable, nationally-revocable patents –subject to central revocation or narrowing as a group pursuant to two types of unified, post-grant procedures: a time-limited opposition procedure, which can be initiated by any person except the patent proprietor, and limitation and revocation procedures, which can be initiated by the patent proprietor only.

Switzerland introduced a federal patent system a year after a referendum held in 1887 (before the subject was devoted to cantons, and in practice there was little protection).[ citation needed ] Until the entry into force of the Patent Treaty between Switzerland and Liechtenstein on 1 April 1980, Swiss patents could be also enforced in Liechtenstein, which at that time did not grant its own patents. This had been made possible by a regulation unilaterally enacted in 1924 by Liechtenstein, but considered only as a temporary measure. The legal situation was unsatisfactory. In the 1970s, when both the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and the European Patent Convention (EPC) were signed and came into effect, to which Liechtenstein wished to participate, Liechtenstein had to either enact its own patent law or sign a regional patent treaty with Switzerland. Liechtenstein chose the latter possibility. [3]

Joint designation and unitary character

A European patent may only be granted jointly in respect of Switzerland and Liechtenstein, following a joint designation under Article 149 EPC. Upon filing a European patent application, an applicant cannot choose to designate Switzerland without designating Liechtenstein, or Liechtenstein without designating Switzerland. The designation of one of the two countries is deemed to be a designation of both. [10] This also meant, for European patent applications filed before 1 April 2009 (before the introduction of an all-inclusive designation fee payable for all EPC contracting states), that a single joint designation fee was payable for Switzerland and Liechtenstein. [10] [11] [12]

After grant, the European patent in force in Switzerland and Liechtenstein—in the same manner as a "national" patent in Switzerland and Liechtenstein— has a truly unitary character. It can only be transferred, revoked or lapse for both states at the same time. It has also the same effect in both countries. [4] The Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property is the only competent national authority regarding the unitary patent for Switzerland and Liechtenstein. [13]

An international application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) can also only jointly designate Switzerland and Liechtenstein under Article 4 PCT. Based on an international application, it is possible to obtain a unitary patent in Switzerland and Liechtenstein by entering either into the European regional phase (therefore leading to a Euro-PCT application, which is essentially the same as a direct European patent application) or into the national phase. [10]

Grant procedures

The unitary patent in Switzerland and Liechtenstein can either be a European patent granted under the European Patent Convention (EPC), or a national patent. The procedure leading to the grant of a European patent and the procedure leading to the grant of a "national" patent in Switzerland and Liechtenstein are, however, different.

The European Patent Office (EPO) is in charge of granting European patents. The grant procedure before the EPO is administrative procedure, which notably involves a substantive examination of the European patent application, [14] in accordance with the legal provisions of the European Patent Convention (EPC).

In contrast, the grant procedure for "national" patents in Switzerland and Liechtenstein takes place before the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property and does not involve a substantial examination. No examination takes place as to whether the claimed invention is new and inventive. The patent is granted provided that certain formal requirements are fulfilled. It is possible to obtain a search report during the procedure, but this is optional and has no effect on the decision to grant. [15]

Languages

While the language of the proceedings at the European Patent Office may only be English, French or German, [16] the proceedings before the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, for the grant of a "national" patent, are conducted in German, French or Italian. [17] As Switzerland and Liechtenstein are parties to the London Agreement, no translation is required for a European patent to remain effective after grant in these two countries.

Jurisdiction

In Switzerland, the Federal Patent Court has exclusive jurisdiction over validity and infringement disputes, preliminary measures and enforcement of decisions made under its exclusive jurisdiction. [18] The patent court started its work in 2012, taking over jurisdiction from 26 individual cantonal courts and consists of panels of both legally and technically qualified judges. [19] In Liechtenstein, the Princely High Court (German: fürstliche Obergericht ) was designated as court of single instance in civil cases regarding patents. [20] Appeal is possible (with regard to legal issues) to the Federal Supreme Court, both for Swiss and Liechtenstein court actions. [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unitary patent</span> Potential EU patent law

The European patent with unitary effect, also known as the unitary patent, is a European patent which benefits from unitary effect in the 17 participating member states of the European Union. Unitary effect may be requested by the proprietor within one month of grant of a European patent, replacing validation of the European patent in the individual countries concerned. Infringement and revocation proceedings are conducted before the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which decisions have a uniform effect for the unitary patent in the participating member states as a whole rather than in each country individually. The unitary patent may be only limited, transferred or revoked, or lapse, in respect of all the participating Member States. Licensing is however possible for part of the unitary territory. The unitary patent may coexist with nationally enforceable patents in the non-participating states. The unitary patent's stated aims are to make access to the patent system "easier, less costly and legally secure within the European Union" and "the creation of uniform patent protection throughout the Union".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Patent Office</span> One of the two organs of the European Patent Organisation

The European Patent Office (EPO) is one of the two organs of the European Patent Organisation (EPOrg), the other being the Administrative Council. The EPO acts as executive body for the organisation while the Administrative Council acts as its supervisory body as well as, to a limited extent, its legislative body. The actual legislative power to revise the European Patent Convention lies with the Contracting States themselves when meeting at a Conference of the Contracting States.

The European Patent Organisation is a public international organisation created in 1977 by its contracting states to grant patents in Europe under the European Patent Convention (EPC) of 1973. The European Patent Organisation has its seat at Munich, Germany, and has administrative and financial autonomy. The organisation is independent from the European Union, and has as member states all 27 EU member states along with 12 other European states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Patent Convention</span> International patent treaty

The European Patent Convention (EPC), also known as the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973, is a multilateral treaty instituting the European Patent Organisation and providing an autonomous legal system according to which European patents are granted. The term European patent is used to refer to patents granted under the European Patent Convention. However, a European patent is not a unitary right, but a group of essentially independent nationally enforceable, nationally revocable patents, subject to central revocation or narrowing as a group pursuant to two types of unified, post-grant procedures: a time-limited opposition procedure, which can be initiated by any person except the patent proprietor, and limitation and revocation procedures, which can be initiated by the patent proprietor only.

The EPC 2000 or European Patent Convention 2000 is the version of the European Patent Convention (EPC) as revised by the Act Revising the Convention on the Grant of European Patents signed in Munich on November 29, 2000. On June 28, 2001, the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation adopted the final new text of the EPC 2000. The EPC 2000 entered into force on December 13, 2007.

There are two provisions in the regulations annexed to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) that relate to the search and examination of patent applications concerning computer programs. These two provisions are present in the PCT, which does not provide for the grant of patents but provides a unified procedure for filing, searching and examining patent applications, called international applications. The question of patentability is touched when conducting the search and the examination, which is an examination of whether the invention appears to be patentable.

The draft European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA), or formally the Draft Agreement on the establishment of a European patent litigation system, was a proposed patent law agreement aimed at creating an "optional protocol to the European Patent Convention (EPC) which would commit its signatory states to an integrated judicial system, including uniform rules of procedure and a common appeal court". It differed from the Unified Patent Court Agreement in that the EPLA negotiations were coordinated from the side of the European Patent Office, rather than from the European Council and Commission and therefore also offered the possibility for non-EU states to participate.

In certain jurisdictions' patent law, industrial applicability or industrial application is a patentability requirement according to which a patent can only be granted for an invention which is susceptible of industrial application, i.e. for an invention which can be made or used in some kind of industry. In this context, the concept of "industry" is far-reaching: it includes agriculture, for instance. An example of invention which would not be susceptible of industrial application is "a method of contraception [...] to be applied in the private and personal sphere of a human being".

European patent law covers a range of legislations including national patent laws, the Strasbourg Convention of 1963, the European Patent Convention of 1973, and a number of European Union directives and regulations. For some states in Eastern Europe, the Eurasian Patent Convention applies.

The European Patent Bulletin is a weekly trilingual publication of the European Patent Office (EPO), generally issued every Wednesday. It contains "entries made in the Register of European Patents, as well as other particulars, the publication of which is prescribed by [the European Patent Convention (EPC)] or its implementation".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Representation before the European Patent Office</span>

The European Patent Convention (EPC), the multilateral treaty providing the legal system according to which European patents are granted, contains provisions regarding whether a natural or juristic person needs to be represented in proceedings before the European Patent Office (EPO).

This is a list of legal terms relating to patents and patent law. A patent is not a right to practice or use the invention claimed therein, but a territorial right to exclude others from commercially exploiting the invention, granted to an inventor or his successor in rights in exchange to a public disclosure of the invention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grant procedure before the European Patent Office</span>

The grant procedure before the European Patent Office (EPO) is an ex parte, administrative procedure, which includes the filing of a European patent application, the examination of formalities, the establishment of a search report, the publication of the application, its substantive examination, and the grant of a patent, or the refusal of the application, in accordance with the legal provisions of the European Patent Convention (EPC). The grant procedure is carried out by the EPO under the supervision of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation. The patents granted in accordance with the EPC are called European patents.

Article 123 of the European Patent Convention (EPC) relates to the amendments under the EPC, i.e. the amendments to a European patent application or patent, and notably the conditions under which they are allowable. In particular, Article 123(2) EPC prohibits adding subject-matter going beyond the content of the application as filed, while Article 123(3) EPC prohibits an extension of the scope of protection by amendment after grant. In addition, Rule 80 EPC limits the types of amendments that can be done during opposition proceedings before the European Patent Office (EPO), and Rule 139 EPC relates to the correction of errors in documents filed with the EPO.

During the grant procedure before the European Patent Office (EPO), divisional applications can be filed under Article 76 EPC out of pending earlier European patent applications. A divisional application, sometimes called European divisional application, is a new patent application which is separate and independent from the earlier application, unless specific provisions in the European Patent Convention (EPC) require something different. A divisional application, which is divided from an earlier application, cannot be broader than the earlier application, neither in terms of subject-matter nor in terms of geographical cover.

German patent law is mainly governed by the Patents Act and the European Patent Convention (EPC).

G 2/98 is an opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) issued on May 31, 2001, after a point of law was referred to it by the President of the EPO. The case pertains to the interpretation of the legal concept of "the same invention" in Article 87(1) EPC. The Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 2/98 provided clarity to that concept. Namely, the Board held that

The requirement for claiming priority of "the same invention", referred to in Article 87(1) EPC, means that priority of a previous application in respect of a claim in a European patent application in accordance with Article 88 EPC is to be acknowledged only if the skilled person can derive the subject-matter of the claim directly and unambiguously, using common general knowledge, from the previous application as a whole.

G 2/19 is a decision issued by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) on 16 July 2019, which deals with three legal questions, the third relating to whether oral proceedings before the EPO Boards of Appeal may be held in Haar in the Munich district rather than in Munich per se, when a party objects to the oral proceedings being held in Haar. In July 2019, the Enlarged Board of Appeal decided that oral proceedings before the Boards of Appeal may be held in Haar without infringing Article 113(1) EPC and Article 116(1) EPC.

G 1/09 is a decision issued on 27 September 2010 by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), holding that, following refusal of a European patent application, the application remains pending until the expiry of the time limit for filing a notice of appeal, so that a divisional application under Article 76 EPC may be filed even after the refusal of an application. More specifically, the divisional application may be filed until expiry of the time limit of two months for filing a notice of appeal under Article 108 EPC.

References

  1. ↑ Article 20(1) of the Treaty of 22 December 1978
  2. ↑ OJ EPO 1980, 407, footnote.
  3. 1 2 Benkard, Joos (2012). "Vorbemerkung zu den Artikeln 142–149a Rn 27-29" [Preliminary remarks on Articles 142-149a Rn 27-29]. Europäisches Patentübereinkommen: EPÜ, 2. Auflage 2012[The European Patent Convention: EPC, 2nd edition 2012] (in German). München (Munich): C.H.BECK. ISBN   978-3-406-60579-6.
  4. 1 2 Article 4(1) of the Treaty of 22 December 1978
  5. 1 2 Visser, Derk (2012). The Annotated European Patent Convention, Twentieth Revised Edition. Veldhoven, The Netherlands: H. Tel Publisher bv. pp. 353–356. ISBN   978-90-78310-08-2.
  6. ↑ Pestalozzi Gmuer & Heiz (1991). Business law guide to Switzerland (reprint ed.). CCH Europe. p. 406. ISBN   978-3-928947-00-8.
  7. ↑ Article 2 of the Treaty of 22 December 1978
  8. ↑ Benkard, Joos (2012). "Vorbemerkung zu den Artikeln 142–149a Rn 1-3" [Preliminary remarks on Articles 142-149a Rn 1-3]. Europäisches Patentübereinkommen: EPÜ, 2. Auflage 2012[The European Patent Convention: EPC, 2nd edition 2012] (in German). München (Munich): C.H.BECK. ISBN   978-3-406-60579-6. Dieser Ansatz würde den Art. 142–149 zu einer überraschenden Renaissance führen, deren Anwendungsfeld sich bisher allein im Patentschutzvertrag zwischen der Schweiz und dem Fürstentum Liechtenstein, (...), erschöpfte. [Translation: This approach [i.e., the future EU unitary patent] would lead Art. 142–149 to a surprising renaissance, as indeed the scope of application of these articles was until now limited only to the Patent Treaty between Switzerland and Liechtenstein (...)]
  9. ↑ Article 2(1) EPC
  10. 1 2 3 Benkard, Joos (2012). "EPÜ Artikel 149 Gemeinsame Benennung Rn 9-10" [Article 149 EPC Joint designation Rn 9-10]. Europäisches Patentübereinkommen: EPÜ, 2. Auflage 2012[The European Patent Convention: EPC, 2nd edition 2012] (in German). München (Munich): C.H.BECK. ISBN   978-3-406-60579-6.
  11. ↑ Guidelines for Examination in the EPO , section a-iii, 11.3.1 : "Designation fee; time limits"
  12. ↑ Visser, Derk (2012). The Annotated European Patent Convention, Twentieth Revised Edition. Veldhoven, The Netherlands: H. Tel Publisher bv. p. 164. ISBN   978-90-78310-08-2.
  13. ↑ Kolle (1980). "Aus dem EPA: Erste europäische Patente erteilt - Jahresbilanz 1979 - neue Dienstleistungen des EPA - Liechtenstein neuer Mitgliedstaat" [Regarding the EPO: First European patents granted - Annual report 1979 - new services by the EPO - Liechtenstein new member State]. GRUR Int (in German): 124.
  14. ↑ Article 94 EPC
  15. ↑ "Protection in Switzerland". Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  16. ↑ Guidelines for Examination in the EPO , section a-vii, 2 : "Language of the proceedings"
  17. ↑ "Richtlinien für die Sachprüfung der nationalen Patentanmeldungen" [Guidelines for substantive examination of national patent applications](PDF). Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (in German). Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  18. ↑ "Federal Act on the Federal Patent Court". Federal Authorities of the Swiss Confederation. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
  19. 1 2 C.P. Rigamonti (2011). "The New Swiss Patent Litigation System". Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and e-Commerce Law. 2: 3. SSRN   1799343.
  20. ↑ "Gesetz zum Vertrag zwischen dem Fürstentum Liechtenstein und der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft über den Schutz der Erfindungspatente". WIPO (in German). Retrieved 13 April 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.