Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation

Last updated
Chairmen of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation
1. Georges Vianès (19 October 1977 - 18 October 1981), French. [1] [2]
2. Ivor J. G. Davis (19 October 1981 - 18 October 1984), British. [2] [3]
3. Otto Leberl (19 October 1984 - October 1987), Austrian. [3] [4]
4. Albrecht Krieger (October 1987 - 18 October 1990), German. [4] [5]
5. Jean-Claude Combaldieu (19 October 1990 - 18 October 1993), French. [5] [6]
6. Per Lund Thoft (19 October 1993 - 30 November 1995), Danish. [6] [7]
7. Julián Álvarez-Álvarez (1 December 1995 - 4 March 1997), Spanish. [7] [8]
8. Sean Fitzpatrick (5 March 1997 - March 4, 2000), Irish. [8] [9] [10]
9. Roland Grossenbacher (March 5, 2000 - March 4, 2009), Swiss. [9] [10] a
10. Benoît Battistelli (March 5, 2009 - June 30, 2009), French. [11]
10a. Alberto Casado Cerviño (July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010) (Chairman ad interim), Spanish. [12]
11. Jesper Kongstad (July 1, 2010 - September 30, 2017), Danish. [13] [14]
12. Christoph Ernst (October 1, 2017 - October 2018), German. [15] [16] [17]
13. Josef Kratochvíl (January 1, 2019 - ), Czech. [18] [19] [20]
aAfter he stepped down, Roland Grossenbacher was made "Honorary Chairman" of the Administrative Council. [21]

The Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation is one of the two organs of the European Patent Organisation (EPOrg), the other being the European Patent Office (EPO). [22] The Administrative Council acts as the Organisation's supervisory body [23] as well as, to a limited extent, its legislative body. [24] [25] The actual legislative power to revise the European Patent Convention (EPC) lies with the Contracting States themselves when meeting at a Conference of the Contracting States. [26] In contrast, the EPO acts as executive body of the Organisation. [23] [25]

Contents

Composition and competences

The Administrative Council is composed of Representatives of the Contracting States [27] and is responsible for overseeing the work of the European Patent Office, [23] ratifying the budget and approving the actions of the President of the Office. [25] The council is also competent for amending the Implementing Regulations of the EPC and some provisions of the Articles of the EPC. [24] Each Contracting State on the Administrative Council has one vote, [28] except under certain circumstances provided for by Article 36 EPC.

The Chairperson of the Administrative Council is responsible for the work of the council and its function. [29] The Chairperson also presides over the meetings of the council. [30]

Under Article 28 EPC, the Administrative Council has set up a Board composed of five of its members, [31] [32] including the Chairman, the Deputy Chairman and three other members elected by the Administrative Council, [33] to perform duties assigned by the Administrative Council. [34] The Board is informally called "Board 28", named after Article 28 EPC, and as of 2008 was carrying out a "workload study", i.e., a study on how to manage the workload facing the EPO. [32]

The Administrative Council is in charge of appointing the President of the EPO. [35] A majority of three-quarters of the votes of the Contracting States represented and voting is required for appointing the President of the EPO. [36] Reaching a decision on the appointment of a President was difficult in 2003, [37] leading to a split tenure (as a result of a compromise, Alain Pompidou (France) was elected for three years and Alison Brimelow (United Kingdom) succeeded him for an equal term), [38] [39] [40] [41] and was difficult again in 2009, requiring twenty votes and four meetings. [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] When voting, a lot of the members of the Administrative Council are reportedly working under instructions from their respective government, whereas the governments "can have many motivations for supporting one person rather than another." [46]

Criticism

The Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) has criticized the Administrative Council as being in a conflict of interest situation:

The heads of the national delegations in the Administrative Council are almost without exception heads of their respective national patent offices. For many of the national offices their 50% share of the renewal fees constitutes a very substantial proportion of their annual budget (in several cases well over 50%). In their function as heads of national offices these heads of delegation thus have an interest in having many patents granted, and having them granted quickly. [47]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Patent Office</span> One of the two organs of the European Patent Organisation

The European Patent Office (EPO) is one of the two organs of the European Patent Organisation (EPOrg), the other being the Administrative Council. The EPO acts as executive body for the organisation while the Administrative Council acts as its supervisory body as well as, to a limited extent, its legislative body. The actual legislative power to revise the European Patent Convention lies with the Contracting States themselves when meeting at a Conference of the Contracting States.

The European Patent Organisation is a public international organisation created in 1977 by its contracting states to grant patents in Europe under the European Patent Convention (EPC) of 1973. The European Patent Organisation has its seat at Munich, Germany, and has administrative and financial autonomy. The organisation is independent from the European Union, and has as member states all 27 EU member states along with 12 other European states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Patent Convention</span> International patent treaty

The European Patent Convention (EPC), also known as the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973, is a multilateral treaty instituting the European Patent Organisation and providing an autonomous legal system according to which European patents are granted. The term European patent is used to refer to patents granted under the European Patent Convention. However, a European patent is not a unitary right, but a group of essentially independent nationally enforceable, nationally revocable patents, subject to central revocation or narrowing as a group pursuant to two types of unified, post-grant procedures: a time-limited opposition procedure, which can be initiated by any person except the patent proprietor, and limitation and revocation procedures, which can be initiated by the patent proprietor only.

The EPC 2000 or European Patent Convention 2000 is the version of the European Patent Convention (EPC) as revised by the Act Revising the Convention on the Grant of European Patents signed in Munich on November 29, 2000. On June 28, 2001, the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation adopted the final new text of the EPC 2000. The EPC 2000 entered into force on December 13, 2007.

The European Patent Convention (EPC), the multilateral treaty instituting the legal system according to which European patents are granted, contains provisions allowing a party to appeal a decision issued by a first instance department of the European Patent Office (EPO). For instance, a decision of an Examining Division refusing to grant a European patent application may be appealed by the applicant. The appeal procedure before the European Patent Office is under the responsibility of its Boards of Appeal, which are institutionally independent within the EPO.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kurt Haertel</span>

Kurt Haertel was a German patent lawyer. He played a leading role in the establishment of the European patent system. He is sometimes referred to as one of the "fathers of the European patent law", or the "father of European patent law". He was President of the Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt from 1963 to 1975. In October 1977, he was elected Honorary Chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">London Agreement (2000)</span>

The London Agreement, formally the Agreement on the application of Article 65 of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents and sometimes referred to as the London Protocol, is a patent law agreement concluded in London on 17 October 2000 and aimed at reducing the translation costs of European patents granted under the European Patent Convention (EPC). The London Agreement is an agreement between some member states of the European Patent Organisation, and has not altered other language requirements applying to European patent applications prior to grant.

Alison Jane Brimelow CBE is a British civil servant and former chief executive and Comptroller General of the UK Patent Office, now known as the Intellectual Property Office. She was the fifth President of the European Patent Office, a position she held from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2010.

Dr. Roland Edouard Grossenbacher is a Swiss attorney at law, who served as chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation from 5 March 2000 to 4 March 2009. He was appointed at this post for a first three-year term on 5 March 2000. He was then reelected in 2002 for a second term, beginning on 5 March 2003. In December 2005, he was again re-elected as Chairman of the Council from a third term from 5 March 2006 to 4 March 2009. After he stepped down in March 2009, he was made "Honorary Chairman" of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation.

Maintenance fees or renewal fees are fees paid to maintain a granted patent in force. Some patent laws require the payment of maintenance fees for pending patent applications. Not all patent laws require the payment of maintenance fees and different laws provide different regulations concerning not only the amount payable but also the regularity of the payments. In countries where maintenance fees are to be paid annually, they are sometimes called patent annuities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grant procedure before the European Patent Office</span>

The grant procedure before the European Patent Office (EPO) is an ex parte, administrative procedure, which includes the filing of a European patent application, the examination of formalities, the establishment of a search report, the publication of the application, its substantive examination, and the grant of a patent, or the refusal of the application, in accordance with the legal provisions of the European Patent Convention (EPC). The grant procedure is carried out by the EPO under the supervision of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation. The patents granted in accordance with the EPC are called European patents.

In European patent law, the limitation and revocation procedures before the European Patent Office (EPO) are post-grant, ex parte, administrative procedures allowing any European patent to be centrally limited by an amendment of the claims or revoked, respectively. These two procedures were introduced in the recently revised text of the European Patent Convention (EPC), i.e. the so-called EPC 2000, which entered into force on 13 December 2007.

The European Round Table on Patent Practice (EUROTAB) is described as "a pan-European group consisting of lawyers in the patent field", or a body where the national patent offices of the Contracting States of the European Patent Convention (EPC) and the European Patent Office come together to discuss differences in practice and see whether a harmonized approach is possible.

Benoît Battistelli is a French civil servant, former president of the European Patent Office (EPO) (2010-2018), and former head of the French National Industrial Property Institute (INPI).

Georges Jean Gabriel Vianès is a former French civil servant, corporate officer and politician. He was head of the French National Industrial Property Institute, the French national intellectual property office from 1975 to 1982. He was also the first Chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation, from 19 October 1977 to 18 October 1981.

Under case number G 3/08, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO issued on May 12, 2010 an opinion in response to questions referred to it by the President of the European Patent Office (EPO), Alison Brimelow, on October 22, 2008. The questions subject of the referral related to the patentability of programs for computers under the European Patent Convention (EPC) and were, according to the President of the EPO, of fundamental importance as they related to the definition of "the limits of patentability in the field of computing." In a 55-page long opinion, the Enlarged Board of Appeal considered the referral to be inadmissible because no divergent decisions had been identified in the referral.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jesper Kongstad</span>

Jesper Kongstad was Chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation from 2010 to September 2017. Until September 2017, he was also Director General of the Danish Patent and Trademark Office. In 2009, he was candidate for the position of President of the European Patent Office, which was to be filled on 1 July 2010, but, in December 2009, he withdrew his candidacy. Jesper Kongstad had been elected as Chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation on 29 June 2010. He took up office on 1 July 2010 for a period of three years, later extended to six years.

During the grant procedure before the European Patent Office (EPO), divisional applications can be filed under Article 76 EPC out of pending earlier European patent applications. A divisional application, sometimes called European divisional application, is a new patent application which is separate and independent from the earlier application, unless specific provisions in the European Patent Convention (EPC) require something different. A divisional application, which is divided from an earlier application, cannot be broader than the earlier application, neither in terms of subject-matter nor in terms of geographical cover.

Art. 23 1/15, Art. 23 2/15 and Art. 23 1/16 are three related cases decided by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office concerning the removal from office of Patrick Corcoran, a member of the Boards of Appeal, who had been previously suspended by the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation. According to Article 23(1) EPC, members of the Boards of Appeal may only be removed from office by the Administrative Council on a proposal from the Enlarged Board of Appeal. Two cases were successively initiated by the Administrative Council, but the Enlarged Board eventually dismissed both of them. In the third case initiated by the Administrative Council, the Enlarged Board decided not to propose the removal from office of Corcoran.

References

  1. ↑ Official Journal of the European Patent Office (OJ EPO) 1/1978, Report on the inaugural meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (19-21 October 1977), p. 5.
  2. 1 2 OJ EPO 7/1981, Report on the 11th meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (2 to 4 June 1981), p. 199.
  3. 1 2 OJ EPO 7/1984, Report on the 18th meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (5 to 8 June 1984), p. 293.
  4. 1 2 OJ EPO 11/1987, Report on the 27th (extraordinary) meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (8 October 1987), p. 473.
  5. 1 2 OJ EPO 8/1990, Report on the 37th meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (26 to 29 June 1990), p. 333.
  6. 1 2 OJ EPO 1-2/1994, Report on the 50th meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (7 to 10 December 1993), p. 1.
  7. 1 2 OJ EPO 1-2/1996, Report on the 60th meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (4 to 8 December 1995), p. 3.
  8. 1 2 OJ EPO 4/1997, Report on the 66th meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (Munich, 5 March 1997) Archived 21 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine , p. 129.
  9. 1 2 OJ EPO 7/2000, Report on the 80th meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (6 to 8 June 2000) Archived 22 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine , p. 307.
  10. 1 2 Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property web site, EPO: victory for Switzerland Archived February 17, 2007, at the Wayback Machine , Bern, October 15, 1999. Consulted on March 24, 2008.
  11. ↑ EPO web site, Benoît Battistelli to head the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation Archived 2008-12-17 at the Wayback Machine , News, December 11, 2008. Consulted on December 11, 2008.
  12. ↑ EPO web site, European Patent Organisation → Administrative Council → Composition Archived 2008-05-17 at the Wayback Machine . Consulted on November 21, 2009.
  13. ↑ European Patent Office website, Jesper Kongstad elected Chairman of Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation Archived 2010-07-03 at the Wayback Machine , News, June 29, 2010. Consulted on June 30, 2010.
  14. ↑ "Re-election of the Chair of the Administrative Council". European Patent Office. 26 March 2013. Archived from the original on 28 March 2013. Retrieved April 6, 2013.
  15. ↑ Klos, Mathieu; Schulze, Christina (29 June 2017). "Europäisches Patentamt: Deutscher wird neuer Chef des Verwaltungsrats" [European Patent Office: German becomes new head of the Administrative Council]. JUVE (in German). JUVE Verlag für juristische Information GmbH. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 9 July 2017.
  16. ↑ Krempl, Stefan (30 June 2017). "Europäisches Patentamt: Deutscher löst Dänen an Verwaltungsratsspitze ab" [European Patent Office: German replaces Dane at the head of the Administrative Council]. heise online (in German). Heise Media. Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 9 July 2017.
  17. ↑ "157th meeting of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (Munich, 10 and 11 October 2018)". Munich: Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation. 12 October 2018. Archived from the original on 18 October 2018. Retrieved 17 October 2018. Finally, the Council took note of Christoph ERNST's resignation, with immediate effect, from his position as Chairman of the Administrative Council.
  18. ↑ "Josef Kratochvíl elected Chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation". epo.org. European Patent Office. 12 December 2018. Archived from the original on 1 May 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  19. ↑ Klos, Mathieu (13 December 2018). "Administrative Council announces new chairman". Juve Patent. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  20. ↑ "Report on the 157th and 158th meetings of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (10 and 11 October 2018 and 12 and 13 December 2018 respectively)". Official Journal of the European Patent Office. European Patent Office (January 2019): A1. 31 January 2019. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020. ...the Council unanimously elected Josef KRATOCHVÍL (CZ) as its Chairman for a term of 3 years, starting on 1 January 2019.
  21. ↑ EPO web site, "A special tribute to a special chairman" Archived 2009-04-10 at the Wayback Machine , News, 1 April 2009. Consulted on April 3, 2009.
  22. ↑ Article 4(2) EPC
  23. 1 2 3 Article 4(3) EPC
  24. 1 2 Article 33 EPC
  25. 1 2 3 Gower's Report on Intellectual Property Archived 2008-03-19 at the Wayback Machine , para 1.34
  26. ↑ Article 172 EPC
  27. ↑ Article 26(1) EPC
  28. ↑ Article 34 EPC
  29. ↑ Article 4(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Council, as amended by the Decision of the Administrative Council of 7 December 2006 revising the Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation Archived 19 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine .
  30. ↑ Article 4(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Council.
  31. ↑ Article 28(1) EPC
  32. 1 2 Managing Intellectual Property, Fees may rise as EPO stresses quality (Interview: Roland Grossenbacher), February 1, 2008
  33. ↑ Article 28(2) EPC
  34. ↑ Article 28(4) EPC
  35. ↑ Article 11(1) EPC
  36. ↑ Article 35(2) EPC
  37. ↑ EPO web site, President Kober's mandate extended at the EPO, Press releases, June 6, 2003 (archived version on archive.org).
  38. ↑ Anjana Ahuja, An obstacle to the patently obvious Archived 2020-10-06 at the Wayback Machine , The Times, October 27, 2003. Consulted on December 13, 2009.
  39. ↑ EPO web site, Election of the President of the European Patent Office, Press releases, 30 October 2003 (archived version on archive.org).
  40. ↑ Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) web site, EPO deadlock broken at last Archived July 16, 2011, at the Wayback Machine , CIPA News, 30 October 2003. Consulted on December 13, 2009.
  41. ↑ Marc Broyde, Paul M. Clarkson, Who Runs the European Patent Office? Archived 2011-07-13 at the Wayback Machine , Intellectual Property Newsletter, December 8, 2003. Consulted on December 13, 2009.
  42. ↑ EPO web site, Decision on next EPO President deferred Archived December 27, 2010, at the Wayback Machine , News, 30 October 2009. Consulted on December 12, 2009.
  43. ↑ EPO web site, Communiqué from the Administrative Council Archived 2009-12-15 at the Wayback Machine , Updates, December 11, 2009. Consulted on December 12, 2009.
  44. ↑ (in German) Stefan Krempl, Führungskrise beim Europäischen Patentamt Archived 2009-12-13 at the Wayback Machine , heise online, 11.12.2009 18:23. Consulted on December 12, 2009.
  45. ↑ EPO web site, EPO President - election procedure suspended Archived February 5, 2010, at the Wayback Machine , News, 3 February 2010. Consulted on December 6, 2010.
  46. 1 2 James Nurton, How the EPO race was won Archived 2010-03-08 at the Wayback Machine , Managing Intellectual Property, Weekly News, 1 March 2010. Consulted on March 6, 2010.
  47. ↑ SUEPO, Central Executive Committee, Re.: IAM blog - Comments on SUEPO Archived 2011-07-13 at the Wayback Machine , su08163cl - 2.04.6b/6, December 15, 2008, p 4. (on the Intellectual Asset Management website)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.