Unscientific America

Last updated
Unscientific America
Unscientific America - How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future.jpg
Author Chris Mooney
Sheril Kirshenbaum
Language English
Genre Popular science
PublisherBasic Books
Publication date
2009
Pages224
ISBN 978-0-465-01305-0
OCLC 436089164

Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future is a nonfiction book by Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum. It was a New York Times best seller. [1] In the book, the authors tackle the problem of scientific illiteracy in America. [2] The authors criticize scientists for talking down to the misinformed and insulting the religious while calling for more friendly and magnanimous science advocates. [3] They also blame the New Atheist movement, the creation–evolution controversy, the entertainment industry, the media, and science skeptics.

Contents

Reception

Science press

The journal Science Communication gave the book a favourable review, noting that the arguments presented "may make the Ph.D. crowd even more cranky than usual." [4] Indeed, the book did spark significant debate [5] particularly on-line. [6] Seed magazine selected Unscientific America as one to "read now" [3] although it was subsequently more critical of certain aspects of the book. [6] The BMJ , while supporting the authors' assessment of the problem, was critical of the proposed solution. It said that the book sometimes "reads like an overlong and somewhat condescending whine about why science and scientists are not sufficiently appreciated." [7] The New Scientist was similarly supportive of the description of the problem while being critical of the solution arguing that "by looking only at science, Unscientific America misses the big picture." [5] American Scientist called it "at best, a thin and unsatisfying broth." [2] Science was also critical calling the book "slight in both length and substance" and the analysis it contains "shallow and unreflective". [8] This review was itself criticized by Donald Marcus of Baylor College of Medicine, who called it "a dismissive rant that misrepresents the text." [9] PZ Myers, who was criticised in the book, stated in his review that "It's not a badly written book, but it's something worse: it's utterly useless." [10]

Other media

California Bookwatch gave it a positive review. [11] Kenneth Krause gave it a mixed to negative review in The Humanist criticizing the lack of an explanation of "how we can interest and invest the popular media in the serious science their viewers and subscribers have so evidently rejected" while characterizing the book with Chicken Little analogies. [12] In the popular press Gerry Rising of The Buffalo News wrote, "This important book makes clear that the turn back toward science after the strong opposition of the Bush administration, [...], falls far short of solving our nation's problems." [13] National Defense magazine said the authors had "captured the current zietgeist" in an analysis of the challenges of recruiting and retaining qualified young professionals in the defense industry. [14] Kirshenbaum was interviewed about the book on Science Friday . [15]

Publication information

Mooney, Chris; Kirshenbaum, Sheril (2009). Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future . Basic Books. ISBN   9780465013050.

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>The Two Cultures</i> Lecture and book by C. P. Snow

"The Two Cultures" is the first part of an influential 1959 Rede Lecture by British scientist and novelist C. P. Snow which were published in book form as The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution the same year. Its thesis was that science and the humanities which represented "the intellectual life of the whole of western society" had become split into "two cultures" and that this division was a major handicap to both in solving the world's problems.

<i>Icons of Evolution</i> Book by Jonathan Wells

Icons of Evolution is a book by Jonathan Wells, an advocate of the scientific intelligent design argument for the existence of God and fellow of the Discovery Institute, in which Wells criticizes the paradigm of evolution by attacking how it is taught. The book includes a 2002 video companion. In 2000, Wells summarized the book's contents in an article in the American Spectator. Several of the scientists whose work is sourced in the book have written rebuttals to Wells, stating that they were quoted out of context, that their work has been misrepresented, or that it does not imply Wells's conclusions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kendrick Frazier</span> American science writer (1942–2022)

Kendrick Crosby Frazier was an American science writer and longtime editor of Skeptical Inquirer magazine. He was also a former editor of Science News, author or editor of ten books, and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). He was a fellow and a member of the executive council of Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), an international organization which promotes scientific inquiry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chris Mooney (journalist)</span> American journalist and author

Christopher Cole Mooney is an American journalist and author of four books including The Republican War on Science (2005). Mooney's writing focuses on subjects such as climate change denialism and creationism in public schools, and he has been described as "one of the few journalists in the country who specialize in the now dangerous intersection of science and politics." In 2020 he was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for a series of articles on global warming published in The Washington Post.

<i>Seed</i> (magazine) Online science magazine

Seed is a defunct online science magazine published by Seed Media Group. The magazine looked at big ideas in science, important issues at the intersection of science and society, and the people driving global science culture. Seed was founded in Montreal by Adam Bly and the magazine was then headquartered in New York with bureaus around the world. May/June 2009 was the last print issue. Content continued to be published on the website until its demise in 2012.

<i>The Republican War on Science</i> 2005 book by Chris Mooney

The Republican War on Science is a 2005 book by Chris Mooney, an American journalist who focuses on the politics of science policy. In the book, Mooney discusses the Republican Party leadership's stance on science, and in particular that of the George W. Bush administration, with regard to issues such as climate change denialism, intelligent design, bioethics, alternative medicine, pollution, separation of church and state, and the government funding of education, research, and environmental protection. The book argues that the administration regularly distorted and/or suppressed scientific research to further its own political aims.

Pharyngula, a blog founded and written by PZ Myers, is hosted on ScienceBlogs and on FreeThoughtBlogs (2011–present). In 2006 the science journal Nature listed it as the top-ranked blog written by a scientist based on popularity. The blog addresses a range of topics, including Myers's academic specialty, biology. It has become particularly well known for Myers's writing style and for his criticism of intelligent design and creationism. In 2009, Hemant Mehta ranked Pharyngula the most popular atheist blog, based on subscriber levels and other factors.

Climate change conspiracy theories assert that the scientific consensus on global warming is based on conspiracies to produce manipulated data or suppress dissent. It is one of a number of tactics used in climate change denial to attempt to manufacture political and public controversy disputing this consensus. Conspiracy theorists typically allege that, through worldwide acts of professional and criminal misconduct, the science behind global warming and climate change has been invented or distorted for ideological or financial reasons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthony Watts (blogger)</span> American blogger (born 1958)

Willard Anthony Watts is an American blogger who runs Watts Up With That?, a climate change denial blog that opposes the scientific consensus on climate change. A former television meteorologist and current radio meteorologist, he is also founder of the Surface Stations project, a volunteer initiative to document the condition of U.S. weather stations. The Heartland Institute helped fund some of Watts' projects, including publishing a report on the Surface Stations project, and invited him to be a paid speaker at its International Conference on Climate Change from 2008 to 2014.

Science Debate 2008, currently ScienceDebate.org, was the beginning of a grassroots campaign to call for a public debate in which the candidates for the U.S. presidential election discuss issues relating to the environment, health and medicine, and science and technology policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PZ Myers</span> American biologist (born 1957)

Paul Zachary Myers is an American biologist who founded and writes the Pharyngula science blog. He is associate professor of biology at the University of Minnesota Morris (UMM) where he works in the field of developmental biology. He is a critic of intelligent design and the creationist movement and other pseudoscientific concepts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Michaels (epidemiologist)</span> American epidemiologist

David Michaels is an American epidemiologist and professor in the Departments of Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology at the Milken Institute School of Public Health of the George Washington University. He held high-level, senate-confirmed public health positions in the administrations of Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, including a stint from 2009 to 2017 as the administrator of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The Climatic Research Unit email controversy began in November 2009 with the hacking of a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) by an external attacker, copying thousands of emails and computer files to various internet locations several weeks before the Copenhagen Summit on climate change.

Scientocracy is the practice of basing public policies on science.

Watts Up With That? (WUWT) is a blog promoting climate change denial that was created by Anthony Watts in 2006.

<i>Merchants of Doubt</i> 2010 book by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway

Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming is a 2010 non-fiction book by American historians of science Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. It identifies parallels between the global warming controversy and earlier controversies over tobacco smoking, acid rain, DDT, and the hole in the ozone layer. Oreskes and Conway write that in each case "keeping the controversy alive" by spreading doubt and confusion after a scientific consensus had been reached was the basic strategy of those opposing action. In particular, they show that Fred Seitz, Fred Singer, and a few other contrarian scientists joined forces with conservative think tanks and private corporations to challenge the scientific consensus on many contemporary issues.

<i>The Meaning of It All</i> 1998 book by Richard Feynman

The Meaning of It All: Thoughts of a Citizen Scientist is a non-fiction book by the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman. It is a collection of three previously unpublished public lectures given by Feynman in 1963. The book was first published in hardcover in 1998, ten years after Feynman's death, by Addison–Wesley. Several paperback and audiobook editions of the book have subsequently been published.

Sheril Kirshenbaum is an American science writer and scientist. She co-authored Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future with Chris Mooney, and wrote The Science of Kissing. She also co-founded and led Science Debate, a nonprofit organization with a stated goal of restoring science to its rightful place in politics.

Science Debate is a nonpartisan American nonprofit organization working to elevate the importance of science and technology in the national public dialogue. They ask candidates running of office to share their science policy perspectives before Election Day so that every politician arrives in office prepared to meet the 21st centuries greatest challenges on day one. Driven by the vital role that science and technology play in the health, environmental, and economic well-being of society, Science Debate strives to provide voters with sufficient and meaningful information on these key issues when electing people to serve in public office.

<i>The Triumph of Doubt</i> 2020 non-fiction book by David Michaels

The Triumph of Doubt: Dark Money and the Science of Deception is a book by David Michaels that was published in 2020.

References

  1. State University of New York at Purchase (7 January 2011). "Speakers for Science in Modern World lecture series announced". US Fed News Service, Including US State News.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  2. 1 2 Miller, Jon D. "A thin broth". American Scientist . Retrieved 2011-01-01.
  3. 1 2 "July releases on how to join the commercial space race, a brief history of futurism, the inner world of mathematicians, and more". Books to Read Now: Seed Picks. Seed . 30 June 2009. Archived from the original on 3 July 2009. Retrieved 2010-12-30.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  4. Tenenbaum, D. J. (2010). "Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future, by Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum. New York: Basic Books, 2009. 209 pp". Science Communication (book review). 32: 132. doi:10.1177/1075547009359802. S2CID   144619603.
  5. 1 2 Giles, Jim (8 August 2009). "Review: Unscientific America by Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum". New Scientist . Retrieved 2011-01-01.
  6. 1 2 Lerner, Evan (17 July 2009). "The new ambassadors of science". Seed . Archived from the original on 21 July 2009. Retrieved 2010-12-30.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  7. Colquhoun, D. (2009). "Trust me, I'm a scientist". BMJ . 339: b3658. doi:10.1136/bmj.b3658. S2CID   72546131. Closed Access logo transparent.svg
  8. Coyne, J. (2009). "Selling science". Science . 325 (5941): 678. doi:10.1126/science.1179131. S2CID   220084888.
  9. Marcus, Donald M. (7 August 2009). "Replies to 'Selling science': A path to selling science". E—Letters. Science . 325 (5941): 678–679. doi:10.1126/science.1179131. S2CID   220084888.
  10. Myers, PZ (8 July 2009). "Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future". Pharyngula . ScienceBlogs . Retrieved 2011-01-01.
  11. "Unscientific America". California Bookwatch (book review). 1 September 2009. Archived from the original on 11 June 2014. Retrieved 2014-04-24.
  12. Krause, Kenneth W. (1 January 2010). "American science in crisis! Really?". The Humanist (book review). American Humanist Association. Archived from the original on 11 June 2014. Retrieved 2014-04-24.
  13. Rising, Gerry (6 December 2009). "Holiday season has nature and science books aplenty". The Buffalo News . Archived from the original on 11 June 2014. Retrieved 2014-04-23.
  14. Erwin, Sandra I. (1 September 2009). "Attracting new blood tougher than building jets and ICBMs". National Defense.[ dead link ]
  15. Flatow, Ira (21 August 2009). "Can 'Unscientific America' Be Science Literate?". Talk of the Nation: Science Friday . NPR. Archived from the original on 11 June 2014. Retrieved 2014-04-24.