The Evolution of Atheism

Last updated
The Evolution of Atheism: The Politics of a Modern Movement
The Evolution of Atheism.jpg
AuthorStephen LeDrew
LanguageEnglish
Subject New Atheism and modern atheism
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publication date
2 November 2015
Pages288
ISBN 9780190225179

The Evolution of Atheism: The Politics of a Modern Movement is a 2015 book by Stephen LeDrew, adapted from his PhD dissertation. Though an atheist, LeDrew criticises the movement of New Atheism, which arose in the 2000s with the "Four Horsemen" Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens as prominent figures.

Contents

According to LeDrew, modern atheism can be "scientific", "humanist" or "libertarian". He aims to describe how New Atheism, a right-wing branch of scientific atheism, arose in popularity and how it contrasts with other atheist views, particularly those who oppose religion in order to achieve social justice.

The book was praised for adding to the scholarship of New Atheism and including original interviews with New Atheist laypeople. Some reviewers criticised LeDrew's choice of categories to divide modern atheism into or contradictory descriptions of New Atheism.

Background

The Evolution of Atheism was published on 2 November 2015 by the Oxford University Press. [1] Author Stephen LeDrew, who is Canadian, [2] was a postdoctoral researcher in sociology at the Centre for the Study of Religion and Society of Uppsala University at the time of the book's publication. [3] [2] It was his first book, adapted from his PhD thesis. [3] [4] LeDrew is an atheist and his aim was to describe the major aims and ideas of the atheist movement. [3] Marek Sullivan of Secularism and Nonreligion said The Evolution of Atheism was "the first book-length, systematic analysis of the New Atheism from a sociological perspective". [5] The book interviews 15 New Atheists, [6] but LeDrew said that a limitation was the lack of statistical or survey evidence. [3]

Synopsis

The book focuses on four major New Atheist figures, collectively known as the "Four Horsemen": Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens. LeDrew argues that a right-wing branch of atheism—New Atheism—deviates from its traditional associations with classical liberalism, social justice and multiculturalism. [7] The modern atheist movement has three bodies of thought, according to LeDrew: scientific atheism, the view that religion is opposed to scientific truth; secular humanism; and libertarianism combined with rationalism. New Atheism fits in the first category. [5] [8] LeDrew compares this to historical conflicts since the beginning of secularism, such as George Holyoake's arguments with Charles Bradlaugh or the division between libertarian views inspired by Herbert Spencer and egalitarian views based on Friedrich Nietzsche, Sigmund Freud or Karl Marx. [5]

LeDrew believes that, in parallel to religious movements, New Atheism has a fundamentalist and dogmatic adoption of scientism—the view that science is the only method of determining information or values. [7] This leads it towards defense of Western hegemony, Islamophobia, and opposition to progressive views on class, gender and race. [7] LeDrew also says that its focus on rationalism and utopianism creates a tendency towards authoritarianism and individualism. [9] He argues that the rise of New Atheism in the mid-2000s could be attributed to the war on terror, an increasing American Christian right, child sex abuse revelations in the Catholic Church, and declining religiosity across America. [5] He discusses other New Atheist figures such as Steven Pinker, A. C. Grayling, Victor J. Stenger, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Lawrence Krauss as well as laypeople in the mass movement. [6]

Reception

Publishers Weekly reviewed the book as "a detailed and even-handed examination of the social and political environment surrounding New Atheism". [7] In Choice Reviews , D. R. Boscaljon recommended the book to general readers and undergraduate students to "understand the shape of atheism and how it has changed", praising that it offers "an excellent analysis of tensions and differences within the atheist movement" more broadly than just New Atheism. [4] Library Journal 's Christian Graham praised it as "an intelligent and sensitive treatise of contemporary atheism", recommending its "well-researched investigation" to "curious readers of all kinds". [10]

Sullivan criticised "definitional vagueness" in LeDrew's distinction between New Atheism, secular humanism and libertarian rationalism, as he shows that they majorly overlap. Moreover, Sullivan believed that there was not a clear division between humanism and scientism, that LeDrew's characterisation of New Atheism as "ideology" contradicts his later findings, and that LeDrew's comparison to past atheist conflicts are simplified as "cycles never simply repeat". Nonetheless, he found it "an extremely valuable synthesis of existing scholarly work" and "a founding block for future analysis". [5]

Marcus Schulzke praised The Evolution of Atheism for its "thoughtful sociological analysis and original data about grassroots activists". However, Schulzke reviewed that LeDrew's characterisation of New Atheism as "fundamentalist" is a "familiar" but flawed argument, contradicting LeDrew's later analysis of its increasing diversity; similarly, writing that it focuses on a male or middle-class vantage point clashes with his later description of its diversity. Schulzke wrote that the book insufficiently justified why conservatism is characteristic of the "heterogeneous" New Atheism rather than just some of its figures, and is "unsatisfying" in trying to "map the movement" onto a left–right political spectrum. [6]

Tom Flynn, writing in Free Inquiry , found LeDrew to be "insightful" on the topic of New Atheism and "thought-provoking" in his taxonomy of the modern atheist movement; however, he wrote that the book is "marred by significant historical, analytic, and conceptual errors". These include that LeDrew's definition of atheism—as active rejection of belief in God—would exclude Dawkins, that he is inconsistent on whether New Atheism is truly "new", and that he has poor knowledge of the history of atheism. Flynn summarised that the book has "undeniable strengths, but its many and serious flaws erode its value". [8]

David Hoelscher of CounterPunch praised the book for its interviews, "non-technical" prose style, "excellent introduction" to the main figures of New Atheism and for "interesting and relevant evidence" that the movement is conservative on gender issues. He approved that LeDrew "demolishes" the "myth" among atheists that "the belief that atheism is simply a matter of not believing in any gods". However, Hoelscher identified a number of limitations: LeDrew's "crediting of the social sciences with the predominant role in the development of humanistic atheism"; his lack of coverage of racism or of "the Islamophobic New Atheist comedian Bill Maher"; and insufficient mention of "economic injustice" as it relates to atheism, such as to anti-capitalist atheists. [2]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Dawkins</span> English evolutionary biologist and author (born 1941)

Richard Dawkins is a British evolutionary biologist and author. He is an emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford, and was Professor for Public Understanding of Science in the University of Oxford from 1995 to 2008. His 1976 book The Selfish Gene popularised the gene-centred view of evolution, as well as coining the term meme. Dawkins has won several academic and writing awards.

Secularism is the principle of seeking to conduct human affairs based on naturalistic considerations, uninvolved with religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secular humanism</span> Life stance that embraces human reason, secular ethics, and philosophical naturalism

Secular humanism is a philosophy, belief system or life stance that embraces human reason, logic, secular ethics, and philosophical naturalism, while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision making.

Irreligion is the neglect or active rejection of religion and, depending on the definition, a simple absence of religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antony Flew</span> English analytic and evidentialist philosopher (1923–2010)

Antony Garrard Newton Flew was an English philosopher. Belonging to the analytic and evidentialist schools of thought, Flew worked on the philosophy of religion. During the course of his career he taught philosophy at the universities of Oxford, Aberdeen, Keele, and Reading in the United Kingdom, and at York University in Toronto, Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center for Inquiry</span> American nonprofit organization

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) is a U.S. nonprofit organization that works to mitigate belief in pseudoscience and the paranormal and to fight the influence of religion in government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Council of Australian Humanist Societies</span>

The Council of Australian Humanist Societies (CAHS) is an umbrella organisation for Australian humanist societies. It was founded in 1965. It is affiliated with Humanists International. The official symbol of CAHS is the Happy Human.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of humanism</span> Overview of and topical guide to humanism

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to humanism:

Atheism, in the broadest sense, is an absence of belief in the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist. In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rebecca Watson</span> American blogger (born 1980)

Rebecca Watson is an American atheist blogger and YouTuber. She is the founder of the blog Skepchick and former co-host of The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. She also previously co-hosted the Little Atoms podcast.

Around 0.7 million people in India did not state their religion in the 2001 census and were counted in the "religion not stated" category. They were 0.06% of India's population. Their number has significantly increased four times, from 0.7 million in the 2001 census to 2.9 million in the 2011 census at an average annual rate of 15%. According to the 2012 WIN-Gallup Global Index of Religion and Atheism report, 81% of Indians were religious, 13% were non-religious, 3% were convinced atheists, and 3% were unsure or did not respond, while a demographic study by Cambridge University Press in 2004 found that around 2-6% of Indians identified as atheists or irreligious.

Agnostic atheism or atheistic agnosticism is a philosophical position that encompasses both atheism and agnosticism. Agnostic atheists are atheistic because they do not hold a belief in the existence of any deity and are agnostic because they claim that the existence of a divine entity or entities is either unknowable in principle or currently unknown in fact.

Atheist feminism is a branch of feminism that also advocates atheism. Atheist feminists hold that religion is a prominent source of female oppression and inequality, believing that the majority of the religions are sexist and oppressive towards women.

The term New Atheism was coined by the American journalist Gary Wolf in 2006 to describe the positions of some atheist academics, writers, scientists, and philosophers of the 21st century. New Atheism advocates the view that superstition, religion, and irrationalism should not simply be tolerated. Instead, they should be criticised, countered, examined, and challenged by rational argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics. Major figures of New Atheism include Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens and Daniel Dennett, collectively referred to as the "four horsemen" of the movement, as well as Ayaan Hirsi Ali until her conversion to Christianity in 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrew Copson</span> British humanist leader (born 1980)

Andrew James William Copson, FRSA, FCMI, MCIPR is a humanist leader and writer. He is the Chief Executive of Humanists UK and the President of Humanists International.

Articles related to philosophy of religion include:

Irreligion in the United Kingdom is more prevalent than in some parts of Europe, with about 8% indicating they were atheistic in 2018, and 52% listing their religion as "none". A third of Anglicans polled in a 2013 survey doubted the existence of God, while 15% of those with no religion believed in some higher power, and deemed themselves "spiritual" or even "religious".

China has the world's greatest irreligious population, and the Chinese government and the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are officially atheist. Despite limitations on certain forms of religious expression and assembly, religion is not banned, and religious freedom is nominally protected under the Chinese constitution. Among the general Chinese population, there are a wide variety of religious practices. The Chinese government's attitude to religion is one of skepticism and non-promotion.

The secular movement refers to a social and political trend in the United States, beginning in the early years of the 20th century, with the founding of the American Association for the Advancement of Atheism in 1925 and the American Humanist Association in 1941, in which atheists, agnostics, secular humanists, freethinkers, and other nonreligious and nontheistic Americans have grown in both numbers and visibility. There has been a sharp increase in the number of Americans who identify as religiously unaffiliated, from under 10 percent in the 1990s to 20 percent in 2013. The trend is especially pronounced among young people, with about one in three Americans younger than 30 identifying as religiously unaffiliated, a figure that has nearly tripled since the 1990s.

References

  1. ↑ The Evolution of Atheism. Oxford University Press. 2 November 2015. ISBN   978-0-19-022517-9. Archived from the original on 22 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 Hoelscher, David (29 January 2016). "New Atheism, Worse Than You Think". CounterPunch . Archived from the original on 9 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Rosch, Staks (26 October 2015). "Sociologist Stephen LeDrew on the Rift in the Atheism Movement". Publishers Weekly . Archived from the original on 9 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  4. 1 2 Boscaljon, D. R. (2016). "The Evolution of Atheism (Review)". Choice Reviews . 53 (7). ProQuest   1771604407.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Sullivan, Marek (2016). "Review of The Evolution of Atheism". Secularism and Nonreligion. 5 (1): 5. doi: 10.5334/snr.73 .
  6. 1 2 3 Schulzke, Marcus (2016). "The Evolution of Atheism (Review)". Politics and Religion. 9 (3). doi:10.1017/S1755048316000365. S2CID   148414896. ProQuest   2211191591.
  7. 1 2 3 4 "The Evolution of Atheism (Review)". Publishers Weekly . 19 October 2015. Archived from the original on 9 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  8. 1 2 Flynn, Tom (2016). "The Evolution of Atheism (Review)". Free Inquiry . 36 (3). Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2022-04-09.
  9. ↑ Jones, James W. (10 March 2016). "Growing criticism by atheists of the New Atheism movement". Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  10. ↑ Christian, Graham (2016). "The Evolution of Atheism (Review)". Library Journal . 141 (1). ProQuest   1751573537.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.