Scientific literacy

Last updated

Scientific literacy or science literacy encompasses written, numerical, and digital literacy as they pertain to understanding science, its methodology, observations, and theories. Scientific literacy is chiefly concerned with an understanding of the scientific method, units and methods of measurement, empiricism and understanding of statistics in particular correlations and qualitative versus quantitative observations and aggregate statistics, as well as a basic understanding of core scientific fields, such as physics, chemistry, biology, ecology, geology and computation.

Contents

Definition

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Framework (2015) defines scientific literacy as "the ability to engage with science-related issues, and with the ideas of science, as a reflective citizen." [1] A scientifically literate person, therefore, is willing to engage in reasoned discourse about science and technology which requires the competencies to:

According to the United States National Center for Education Statistics, "scientific literacy is the knowledge and understanding of scientific concepts and processes required for personal decision making, participation in civic and cultural affairs, and economic productivity". [2] A scientifically literate person is defined as one who has the capacity to:

Scientific literacy may also be defined in language similar to the definitions of ocean literacy, [4] Earth science literacy [5] and climate literacy. [6] Thus a scientifically literate person can:

Finally, scientific literacy may involve particular attitudes toward learning and using science. Scientifically-literate citizens are capable of researching matters of fact for themselves. [7]

History

Reforms in science education in the United States have often been driven by strategic challenges such as the launch of the Sputnik satellite in 1957 and the Japanese economic boom in the 1980s. [8] The phrase science literacy was popularized by Paul Hurd in 1958, [9] when he charged that the immediate problem in education was "one of closing the gap between the wealth of scientific achievement and the poverty of scientific literacy in America". [10] For Hurd, rapid innovation in science and technology demanded an education "appropriate for meeting the challenges of an emerging scientific revolution." [10] Underlying Hurd's call was the idea "that some mastery of science is essential preparation for modern life." [9]

Initial definitions of science literacy included elaborations of the content that people should understand, often following somewhat traditional lines (biology, chemistry, physics). Earth science was somewhat narrowly defined as expanded geological processes. In the decade after those initial documents, ocean scientists and educators revised the notion of science literacy to include more contemporary, systems-oriented views of the natural world, leading to scientific literacy programs for the ocean, climate, earth science, and so on.

Since the 1950s, scientific literacy has increasingly emphasized scientific knowledge being as socially situated and heavily influenced by personal experience. [9] Science literacy is seen as a human right [11] and a working knowledge of science and its role in society is seen as a requirement for responsible members of society, one that helps average people to make better decisions and enrich their lives. [12] [13] In the United States, this change in emphasis can be noted in the late 1980s and early 1990s, with the publication of Science for All Americans [14] and Benchmarks for Science Literacy. [15]

The National Science Education Standards (1996) defined scientific literacy as "the knowledge and understanding of scientific concepts and processes required for personal decision making, participation in civic and cultural affairs, and economic productivity". [16] In addition, it emphasized that scientific literacy was not simply a matter of remembering specific scientific content. It involved the development of key abilities or skills. "Scientific literacy means that a person can ask, find, or determine answers to questions derived from curiosity about everyday experiences. It means that a person has the ability to describe, explain, and predict natural phenomena." [17]

Some emphasize the importance of an underlying "ethos" that makes it possible to participate in scientific debates and communities. Key norms are that the observations and hypotheses of scientific discovery are part of a communally shared process; that ideas are important, not the status of the person who voices them; that what matters is disinterested evidence, not desired outcomes; and that statements that go beyond observations should be subject to testing. [18]

More recently, calls for "scientific literacy" have identified misinformation and disinformation as dangers. They suggest that civic science literacy, digital media science literacy, and cognitive science literacy are all important components of education, if individuals are to be scientifically informed and engage in individual and collective decision-making in a democratic society. [19]

Comparisons of the views of citizens and scientists by the Pew Research Center suggest that they hold very different positions on a range of science, engineering and technology-related issues. Both citizens and scientists rate K–12 STEM education in the U.S. poorly. [20]

Science, society, and the environment

The interdependence of humans and our natural environment is at the heart of scientific literacy in the Earth systems. As defined by nationwide consensus among scientists and educators, this literacy has two key parts. First, a literate person is defined, in language that echoes the above definition of scientific literacy. Second, a set of concepts are listed, organized into six to nine big ideas or essential principles. This defining process was undertaken first for ocean literacy, [4] then for the Great Lakes, [21] estuaries, [22] the atmosphere, [23] and climate. [6] Earth science literacy [5] is one of the types of literacy defined for Earth systems; the qualities of an Earth science literate person are representative of the qualities for all the Earth system literacy definitions.

According to the Earth Science Literacy Initiative, an Earth-science-literate person:

All types of literacy in Earth systems have a definition like the above. Ocean literacy is further defined as "understanding our impact on the ocean and the ocean's impact on us". [4] Similarly, the climate literacy website includes a guiding principle for decision making; "humans can take action to reduce climate change and its impacts". [6] Each type of Earth systems literacy then defines the concepts students should understand upon graduation from high school. Current educational efforts in Earth systems literacy tend to focus more on the scientific concepts than on the decision-making aspect of literacy, but environmental action remains as a stated goal.

The theme of science in a socially-relevant context appears in many discussions of scientific literacy. Ideas that turn up in the life sciences include an allusion to ecological literacy, the "well-being of earth". Robin Wright, a writer for Cell Biology Education, laments "will [undergraduates'] misunderstandings or lack of knowledge about science imperil our democratic way of life and national security?" [24] A discussion of physics literacy includes energy conservation, ozone depletion and global warming. [25] The mission statement of the Chemistry Literacy Project includes environmental and social justice. [26] Technological literacy is defined in a three-dimensional coordinate space; on the knowledge axis, it is noted that technology can be risky, and that it "reflects the values and culture of society". [27] Energy literacy boasts several websites, including one associated with climate literacy. [6]

Attitudes about science

Attitudes about science can have a significant effect on scientific literacy. In education theory, understanding of content lies in the cognitive domain, while attitudes lie in the affective domain. [28] Thus, negative attitudes, such as fear of science, can act as an affective filter and an impediment to comprehension and future learning goals. In the United States, student attitudes toward science are known to decline beginning in fourth grade and continue to decline through middle and high school. [29] This beginning of negative feelings about science stems from a greater emphasis put on grades. Students begin to feel that they are achieving less which causes them to lose motivation in the classroom and student participation drops. It has been well documented that students who retain high motivation for learning will have a more positive attitude toward the subject. [30] Studies of college students' attitudes about learning physics suggest that these attitudes may be divided into categories of real world connections, personal connections, conceptual connections, student effort and problem-solving. [31]

The decision-making aspect of science literacy suggests further attitudes about the state of the world, one's responsibility for its well-being and one's sense of empowerment to make a difference. These attitudes may be important measures of science literacy, as described in the case of ocean literacy. [32]

In the K–12 classroom, learning standards do not commonly address the affective domain due to the difficulty in developing teaching strategies and in assessing student attitude. Many modern teaching strategies have been shown to have positive impacts on student attitudes toward science including the use of student-centered instruction, innovative learning strategies and utilizing a variety of teaching techniques. [29] [30] [33] Project-based learning has also been shown to improve student attitudes about a subject and improve their scientific processing skills. [30]

Teachers can use Likert scales or differential scales to determine and monitor changes in student attitudes towards science and science learning.

Promoting and measuring

Proponents of scientific literacy tend to focus on what is learned by the time a student graduates from high school. Science literacy has always been an important element of the standards movement in education. All science literacy documents have been drafted with the explicit intent of influencing educational standards, as a means to drive curriculum, teaching, assessment, and ultimately, learning nationwide. [34] Moreover, scientific literacy provides an important basis for making informed social decisions. Science is a human process carried out in a social context, which makes it relevant as a part of our science education. In order for people to make evidence-informed decision, everyone should seek to improve their scientific literacy. [35]

Relevant research has suggested ways to promote scientific literacy to students more efficiently. [36] [37] [38] Programs to promote scientific literacy among students abound, including several programs sponsored by technology companies, as well as quiz bowls and science fairs. A partial list of such programs includes the Global Challenge Award, the National Ocean Sciences Bowl and Action Bioscience. [39]

Some organizations have attempted to compare the scientific literacy of adults in different countries. The OECD found that scientific literacy in the United States is not measurably different from the OECD average. [40] Science News reports "The new U.S. rate, based on questionnaires administered in 2008, is seven percentage points behind Sweden, the only European nation to exceed the Americans. The U.S. figure is slightly higher than that for Denmark, Finland, Norway and the Netherlands. And it’s double the 2005 rate in the United Kingdom (and the collective rate for the European Union)." [41]

University educators are attempting to develop reliable instruments to measure scientific literacy, and the use of concept inventories is increasing in the fields of physics, astronomy, chemistry, biology [42] and earth science. [43]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ PISA 2015 Science Framework (PDF) (Report). OECD. March 2013. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  2. ↑ NAS 1996
  3. ↑ NAS 1996 , page 22
  4. 1 2 3 OLN 2011
  5. 1 2 3 ESLI 2009
  6. 1 2 3 4 CLN 2011
  7. ↑ Noam Chomsky on what it means to be educated
  8. ↑ Rutherford 1997
  9. 1 2 3 Feinstein, Noah (January 2011). "Salvaging science literacy". Science Education. 95 (1): 168–185. Bibcode:2011SciEd..95..168F. doi: 10.1002/sce.20414 .
  10. 1 2 Hurd, P. D. (1958). "Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools" (PDF). Educational Leadership. 16 (1): 13–16, 52.
  11. ↑ Schuck, Patrick; Feser, Markus Sebastian (6 April 2022). "Science Education as a Human Right: A Systematic Review of the Literature" (PDF). European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 10 (3): 338–351. doi:10.30935/scimath/11967.
  12. ↑ The public understanding of science (PDF). London: The Royal Society. 1985. ISBN   0854032576.
  13. ↑ "Public Understanding of Science: The Royal Society Reports". Science, Technology, & Human Values. 11 (3): 53–60. July 1986. doi:10.1177/016224398601100306. ISSN   0162-2439. S2CID   220874596.
  14. ↑ Rutherford & Ahlgren 1991
  15. ↑ American Association for the Advancement of Science 1993
  16. ↑ National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/4962. ISBN   978-0-309-05326-6.
  17. ↑ Lombrozo, Tania (September 14, 2015). "Scientific Literacy: It's Not (Just) About The Facts". NPR.
  18. ↑ Elhai, Jeff (10 January 2023). "Science Literacy: a More Fundamental Meaning". Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education. 24 (1): e00212–22. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00212-22 . PMC   10117068 . PMID   37089228.
  19. ↑ Howell, Emily L.; Brossard, Dominique (13 April 2021). "(Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (15): e1912436117. Bibcode:2021PNAS..11812436H. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912436117 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   8053972 . PMID   33876739.
  20. ↑ Funk, Cary (29 January 2015). "Public and Scientists' Views on Science and Society". Pew Research Center Science & Society.
  21. ↑ OSGCP 2010
  22. ↑ NOAA 2008
  23. ↑ UCAR 2007
  24. ↑ Wright 2005
  25. ↑ Hobson 2003
  26. ↑ CLP 2009
  27. ↑ Gamire & Pearson 2006
  28. ↑ Bloom et al. 1969
  29. 1 2 "Change in student beliefs about attitudes toward science in grades 6-9". www.eduhk.hk. Retrieved 2021-04-15.
  30. 1 2 3 Şener, Nilay; Türk, Cumhur; Taş, Erol (2015-05-08). "Improving Science Attitude and Creative Thinking through Science Education Project: A Design, Implementation and Assessment". Journal of Education and Training Studies. 3 (4): 57–67. doi: 10.11114/jets.v3i4.771 . ISSN   2324-8068.
  31. ↑ Adams et al. 2006
  32. ↑ Cudaback 2008
  33. ↑ "Changing and Measuring Attitudes in the Science Classroom | NARST". narst.org. Retrieved 2021-04-15.
  34. ↑ National Science Education Standards. NAP.edu. 1996. doi:10.17226/4962. ISBN   978-0-309-05326-6.
  35. ↑ Maienschein, Jane (1998-08-14). "Scientific Literacy". Science. 281 (5379): 917. Bibcode:1998Sci...281..917M. doi:10.1126/science.281.5379.917. ISSN   0036-8075. S2CID   220094894.
  36. ↑ Cetinkaya, Ertan; Saribas, Deniz (2022-03-04). "Facilitating Middle School Students' Reasoning About Vaccines". Science & Education. 32 (2): 361–380. Bibcode:2023Sc&Ed..32..361C. doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00318-8. ISSN   1573-1901. PMC   8894820 . PMID   35261482.
  37. ↑ Ortiz-Revilla, Jairo; Greca, Ileana M.; Arriassecq, Irene (2021-08-03). "A Theoretical Framework for Integrated STEM Education". Science & Education. 31 (2): 383–404. doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x. ISSN   0926-7220. S2CID   238138693.
  38. ↑ Ampatzidis, Georgios; Ergazaki, Marida (2021-11-25). "How Did Darwin Prefer His Tea?". Science & Education. 32 (1): 37–56. Bibcode:2023Sc&Ed..32...37A. doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00305-z. ISSN   1573-1901. S2CID   256269585.
  39. ↑ AIBS 2011
  40. ↑ NCES 2011
  41. ↑ Science News 2010
  42. ↑ Klymkowsky, Underwood & Garvin-Doxas 2010
  43. ↑ Libarkin et al. 2011

Related Research Articles

Science education is the teaching and learning of science to school children, college students, or adults within the general public. The field of science education includes work in science content, science process, some social science, and some teaching pedagogy. The standards for science education provide expectations for the development of understanding for students through the entire course of their K-12 education and beyond. The traditional subjects included in the standards are physical, life, earth, space, and human sciences.

The Association of College and Research Libraries defines information literacy as a "set of integrated abilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of how information is produced and valued and the use of information in creating new knowledge and participating ethically in communities of learning". In the United Kingdom, the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals' definition also makes reference to knowing both "when" and "why" information is needed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Geophysical Union</span> Nonprofit organization of geophysicists

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization of Earth, atmospheric, ocean, hydrologic, space, and planetary scientists and enthusiasts that according to their website includes 130,000 people. AGU's activities are focused on the organization and dissemination of scientific information in the interdisciplinary and international fields within the Earth and space sciences. The geophysical sciences involve four fundamental areas: atmospheric and ocean sciences; solid-Earth sciences; hydrologic sciences; and space sciences. The organization's headquarters is located on Florida Avenue in Washington, D.C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental education</span> Branch of pedagogy

Environmental education (EE) refers to organized efforts to teach how natural environments function, and particularly, how human beings can manage behavior and ecosystems to live sustainably. It is a multi-disciplinary field integrating disciplines such as biology, chemistry, physics, ecology, earth science, atmospheric science, mathematics, and geography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital literacy</span> Competency in using digital technology

Digital literacy is an individual's ability to find, evaluate, and communicate information using typing or digital media platforms. It is a combination of both technical and cognitive abilities in using information and communication technologies to create, evaluate, and share information.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Financial literacy</span> Able to make informed choices about money

Financial literacy is the possession of skills, knowledge, and behaviors that allow an individual to make informed decisions regarding money. Financial literacy, financial education and financial knowledge are used interchangeably. Financially unsophisticated individuals cannot plan financially because of their poor financial knowledge. Financially sophisticated individuals are good at financial calculations; for example they understand compound interest, which helps them to engage in low-credit borrowing. Most of the time, unsophisticated individuals pay high costs for their debt borrowing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scientific misconceptions</span> False beliefs about science

Scientific misconceptions are commonly held beliefs about science that have no basis in actual scientific fact. Scientific misconceptions can also refer to preconceived notions based on religious and/or cultural influences. Many scientific misconceptions occur because of faulty teaching styles and the sometimes distancing nature of true scientific texts. Because students' prior knowledge and misconceptions are important factors for learning science, science teachers should be able to identify and address these conceptions.

Inquiry-based learning is a form of active learning that starts by posing questions, problems or scenarios. It contrasts with traditional education, which generally relies on the teacher presenting facts and their knowledge about the subject. Inquiry-based learning is often assisted by a facilitator rather than a lecturer. Inquirers will identify and research issues and questions to develop knowledge or solutions. Inquiry-based learning includes problem-based learning, and is generally used in small-scale investigations and projects, as well as research. The inquiry-based instruction is principally very closely related to the development and practice of thinking and problem-solving skills.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Information and media literacy</span> Overview of information and media literacy

Information and media literacy (IML) enables people to show and make informed judgments as users of information and media, as well as to become skillful creators and producers of information and media messages. IML is a combination of information literacy and media literacy. The transformative nature of IML includes creative works and creating new knowledge; to publish and collaborate responsibly requires ethical, cultural and social understanding.

The branches of science, also referred to as sciences, scientific fields or scientific disciplines, are commonly divided into three major groups:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Science communication</span> Public communication of science-related topics to non-experts

Science communication encompasses a wide range of activities that connect science and society. Common goals of science communication include informing non-experts about scientific findings, raising the public awareness of and interest in science, influencing people's attitudes and behaviors, informing public policy, and engaging with diverse communities to address societal problems. The term "science communication" generally refers to settings in which audiences are not experts on the scientific topic being discussed (outreach), though some authors categorize expert-to-expert communication as a type of science communication. Examples of outreach include science journalism and health communication. Since science has political, moral, and legal implications, science communication can help bridge gaps between different stakeholders in public policy, industry, and civil society.

Ecological literacy is the ability to understand the natural systems that make life on earth possible. To be ecoliterate means understanding the principles of organization of ecological communities and using those principles for creating sustainable human communities. The term was coined by American educator David W. Orr and physicist Fritjof Capra in the 1990s – thereby a new value entered education; the "well-being of the earth".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earth system science</span> Scientific study of the Earths spheres and their natural integrated systems

Earth system science (ESS) is the application of systems science to the Earth. In particular, it considers interactions and 'feedbacks', through material and energy fluxes, between the Earth's sub-systems' cycles, processes and "spheres"—atmosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, geosphere, pedosphere, lithosphere, biosphere, and even the magnetosphere—as well as the impact of human societies on these components. At its broadest scale, Earth system science brings together researchers across both the natural and social sciences, from fields including ecology, economics, geography, geology, glaciology, meteorology, oceanography, climatology, paleontology, sociology, and space science. Like the broader subject of systems science, Earth system science assumes a holistic view of the dynamic interaction between the Earth's spheres and their many constituent subsystems fluxes and processes, the resulting spatial organization and time evolution of these systems, and their variability, stability and instability. Subsets of Earth System science include systems geology and systems ecology, and many aspects of Earth System science are fundamental to the subjects of physical geography and climate science.

Agricultural literacy is a phrase being used by several universities to describe programs to promote the understanding and knowledge necessary to synthesize, analyze, and communicate basic information about agriculture with students, producers, consumers, and the public. These programs focus on assisting educators and others to effectively incorporate information about agriculture into subjects being taught or examined in public and private forums and to better understand the impact of agriculture on society.

Statistics education is the practice of teaching and learning of statistics, along with the associated scholarly research.

In studies of science communication, the information deficit model, also known as the deficit model or science literacy/knowledge deficit model, theorizes that scientific literacy can be improved with increased public engagement by the scientific community. As a result, the public may then be able to make more decisions that are science-informed. The model implies that communication should focus on improving the transfer of information from experts to non-experts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon literacy</span> Awareness of climate change and its causes

Carbon Literacy is the awareness of climate change and the climate impacts of humankind's everyday actions. The term has been used in a range of contexts in scientific literature and in casual usage, but is most associated with The Carbon Literacy Project (CLP).

Science capital is a conceptual tool developed by Professor Louise Archer and colleagues at King's College London. It uses the theoretical frameworks created by French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu to summarise an individual’s science-related habitus and capital. It can be used to help understanding how social class affects people's aspirations and involvement in science. The concept comes from research in education but is also used more broadly in practice and policy, for instance in the work of the Science and Technology Committee of the House of Commons in the UK.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate communication</span> Environmental and science communication

Climate communication or climate change communication is a field of environmental communication and science communication focused on discussing the causes, nature and effects of anthropogenic climate change.

Epistemic insight is a leap of mind that takes place when a learner makes a connection or realisation about how knowledge works. The construct is chiefly used in educational contexts. It encompasses curiosity, critical thinking and understanding concerning the nature of knowledge. It is associated with research and articles that seek or discuss ways to advance student understanding of knowledge and the interdependencies of disciplines across subjects and in real world contexts.

References

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.