Information and media literacy

Last updated

Information and media literacy (IML) enables people to show and make informed judgments as users of information and media, as well as to become skillful creators and producers of information and media messages. [1] IML is a combination of information literacy and media literacy. [2] The transformative nature of IML includes creative works and creating new knowledge; to publish and collaborate responsibly requires ethical, cultural and social understanding.

Contents

IML is also known as media and information literacy (MIL). [3] UNESCO first adopted the term MIL in 2008 [4] as a "composite concept" combining the competencies of information literacy and media literacy. [5]

Students in computer lab Students in a computer lab.jpg
Students in computer lab

Prior to the 1990s, the primary focus of information literacy was research skills. [7] Media literacy, a study that emerged around the 1970s, traditionally focuses on the analysis and the delivery of information through various forms of media. [8] These days, the study of information literacy has been extended to include the study of media literacy in many countries like the UK, [9] Australia and New Zealand. [10] It is also referred to as information and communication technologies (ICT) in the United States. [11] [12] Educators such as Gregory Ulmer have also defined the field as electracy.

Integration of Media and Information Literacy

Historically, the fields of information and media literacy have been separate, but over the course of the 21st century there have been calls to integrate both fields. Media education has primarily taken place in educational institutions, while information education has primarily occurred in libraries. [13] Discussions surrounding the overlap of information literacy and media literacy came to fruition in the mid-to-late 2000s and 2010s as noted by Marcus Leaning. [14]

In the digital age

The definition of literacy is "the ability to read and write". [15] In practice many more skills are needed to locate, critically assess and make effective use of information. [16] By extension, literacy now also includes the ability to manage and interact with digital information and media, in personal, shared and public domains. [17] [18] [19] [20]

Historically, "information literacy" has largely been seen from the relatively top-down, organisational viewpoint of library and information sciences. [21] However the same term is also used to describe a generic "information literacy" skill. [21]

The modern digital age has led to the proliferation of information spread across the Internet. Individuals must be able to recognize whether information is true or false and better yet know how to locate, evaluate, use, and communicate information in various formats; [22] this is called information literacy.

Towards the end of the 20th century, literacy was redefined to include "new literacies" relating to the new skills needed in everyday experience. [20] [16] "Multiliteracies" recognised the multiplicity of literacies, which were often used in combination. [23] [20] [16] "21st century skills" frameworks link new literacies to wider life skills such as creativity, critical thinking, accountability. [24] [20]

What these approaches have in common is a focus on the multiple skills needed by individuals to navigate changing personal, professional and public "information landscapes". [20] [21] [25] [16] [26]

As the conventional definition of literacy itself continues to evolve among practitioners, [27] so too has the definition of information literacies. Noteworthy definitions include:

21st-century students

The IML learning capacities prepare students to be 21st century literate. According to Jeff Wilhelm (2000), "technology has everything to do with literacy. And being able to use the latest electronic technologies has everything to do with being literate." [29] He supports his argument with J. David Bolter's statement that "if our students are not reading and composing with various electronic technologies, then they are illiterate. They are not just unprepared for the future; they are illiterate right now, in our current time and context". [30]

Wilhelm's statement is supported by the 2005 Wired World Phase II (YCWW II) survey conducted by the Media Awareness Network of Canada [31] on 5000 Grade 4 – 11 students. [32] The key findings of the survey were:

Marc Prensky (2001) uses the term "digital native" to describe people who have been brought up in a digital world. [34] The Internet has been a pervasive element of young people's home lives. 94% of kids reported that they had Internet access at home, and a significant majority (61%) had a high-speed connection.

By the time kids reach Grade 11, half of them (51 percent) have their own Internet-connected computer, separate and apart from the family computer. [35] The survey also showed that young Canadians are now among the most wired in the world. Contrary to the earlier stereotype of the isolated and awkward computer nerd, today's wired kid is a social kid. [36]

In general, many students are better networked through the use of technology than most teachers and parents, who may not understand the abilities of technology. Students are no longer limited to desktop computer. They may use mobile technologies to graph mathematical problems, research a question for social studies, text message an expert for information, or send homework to a drop box. [37] Students are accessing information by using MSN, personal Web pages, Weblogs and social networking sites.

Information Literacy is taught to college students in programs such as Chiropractic to shift such fields more towards Evidence Based Practice. Courses which accomplish this are preferentially titled "Information Lit Lab", as opposed to "Information Literacy Lab" or "Information Literacy Laboratory".

Teaching and learning in the 21st century

Many teachers continue the tradition of teaching of the past 50 years. Traditionally teachers have been the experts sharing their knowledge with children. Technology, and the learning tools it provides access to, forces us to change to being facilitators of learning. We have to change the stereotype of teacher as the expert who delivers information, and students as consumers of information, in order to meet the needs of digital students. Teachers not only need to learn to speak digital, but also to embrace the language of digital natives.

Language is generally defined as a system used to communicate [38] in which symbols convey information. Digital natives can communicate fluently with digital devices and convey information in a way that was impossible without digital devices. People born prior to 1988 are sometimes referred to as "digital immigrants." They experience difficulty programming simple devices like a VCR. Digital immigrants do not start pushing buttons to make things work.

Learning any language is best done early in a child's development. In acquiring a second language, Hyltenstam (1992) found that around the age of 6 and 7 seemed to be a cut-off point for bilinguals to achieve native-like proficiency. After that age, second language learners could get near-native-like-ness but their language would, while consisting of very few actual errors, have enough errors that would set them apart from the first language group. Although more recent research suggests this impact still exists up to 10 years of age. [39]

Kindergarten and grades 1 and 2 are therefore critical to student success as digital natives because not all students have a "digital"-rich childhood. Students learning technological skills before Grade 3 can become equivalently bilingual. It has been said that "Language-minority students who cannot read and write proficiently in English cannot participate fully in American schools, workplaces, or society. They face limited job opportunities and earning power." [40]

In the curriculum

Information and Media Literacy has been embraced in the curriculum in order to develop the strategies needed for informed, critical, and engaged individuals and citizens. Organizations such as the European Commission and UNESCO have been promoting initiatives and providing instructional documentation about the curricular integration of IML. [41]

Europe and Central Asia

United Kingdom

In the UK, education of Information and Media Literacy is typically introduced through mainstream formal education in secondary, further and higher education curriculum (such as Media Studies classes), broader curriculum or extra-curricular activity (such as literacy education or Citizenship), e-safety policies, or computer and information literacy/education outside of the formal educational system. [42]

IML has been promoted among educators through an information literacy website [43] developed by several organizations that have been involved in the field. Ofcom, or the Office of Communications, is another organization that researches and promotes IML in the UK. [44]

North America

United States

IML is included in the Partnership for the 21st Century program sponsored by the US Department of Education. [45] Special mandates have been provided to Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, New Jersey, Massachusetts, North Carolina, South Dakota, West Virginia and Wisconsin. [46] Individual school districts, such as the Clarkstown Central School District, [47] have also developed their own information literacy curriculum. ISTE has also produced the National Educational Technology Standards for Students, Teachers and Administrators.

Canada

In British Columbia, Canada, the Ministry of Education has de-listed the Information Technology K to 7 IRP [48] as a stand-alone course. It is still expected that all the prescribed learning outcomes continue to be integrated. Unfortunately, there has been no clear direction to implement IML.

The BC Ministry of Education published the Information and Communications Technology Integration Performance Standards, Grades 5 to 10 ICTI in 2005. [49] These standards provide performance standards expectations for Grade 5 to 10; however, they do not provide guidance for other grades, and the expectation for a Grade 5 and Grade 10 student are the same.

Latin America

Mexico

UNESCO founded the Network for Media and Information Literacy in Mexico in August of 2021. This was project aimed to introduce a pathway for academia, government/civil organizations, and other institutions to promote the spread of media and information literacy skills. The MIL Network Mexico focused on making visible the issues surrounding MIL in Mexico, such as disinformation and hate speech. This focus on visibility also promotes to aid in developing appropriate MIL skills across disenfranchised groups, teens and young adults, and key figures that amplify the spread of information like journalists and educators.

There are multiple members of the MIL Network Mexico that actively promote its mission: UNESCO MILID CHAIR UDG, DW Akademie, Instituto Mexicano de la Radio (IMER), Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE), SocialTIC, Universidad Autonóma de Nuevo León, Universidad Veracruzana, and UNESCO México. [50]

Middle East and North Africa

In the Arab region, media and information literacy was largely ignored up until 2011, when the Media Studies Program at the American University of Beirut, the Open Society Foundations and the Arab-US Association for Communication Educators (AUSACE) launched a regional conference themed "New Directions: Digital and Media Literacy". The conference attracted significant attention from Arab universities and scholars, who discussed obstacles and needs to advance media literacy in the Arab region, including developing curricula in Arabic, training faculty and promoting the field.

Following up on that recommendation, the Media Studies Program at AUB and the Open Society Foundations in collaboration with the Salzburg Academy on Media and Global Change launched in 2013 the first regional initiative to develop, vitalize, and advance media literacy education in the Arab region. The Media and Digital Literacy Academy of Beirut (MDLAB) offered an annual two-week summer training program in addition to working year-round to develop media literacy curricula and programs. The academy is conducted in Arabic and English and brings pioneering international instructors and professionals to teach advanced digital and media literacy concepts to young Arab academics and graduate students from various fields. MDLAB hopes that the participating Arab academics will carry what they learned to their countries and institutions and offers free curricular material in Arabic and English, including media literacy syllabi, lectures, exercises, lesson plans, and multi-media material, to assist and encourage the integration of digital and media literacy into Arab university and school curricula.

In recognition of MDLAB's accomplishments in advancing media literacy education in the Arab region, the founder of MDLAB received the 2015 UNESCO-UNAOC International Media and Information Literacy Award.

Prior to 2013, only two Arab universities offered media literacy courses: the American University of Beirut (AUB) and the American University of Sharjah (AUS). Three years after the launch of MDLAB, over two dozen Arab universities incorporated media literacy education into their curricula, both as stand-alone courses or as modules injected into their existing media courses. Among the universities who have full-fledged media literacy courses (as of 2015) are Lebanese American University (Lebanon), Birzeit University (Palestine), University of Balamand (Lebanon), Damascus University (Syria), Rafik Hariri University (Lebanon), Notre Dame University (Lebanon), Ahram Canadian University (Egypt), American University of Beirut (Lebanon), American University of Sharjah (UAE), and Al Azm University (Lebanon). The first Arab school to adopt media literacy as part of its strategic plan is the International College (IC) in Lebanon. Efforts to introduce media literacy to the region's other universities and schools continues with the help of other international organizations, such as UNESCO, UNAOC, AREACORE, DAAD, and OSF.

East Asia and Pacific

In Singapore [51] and Hong Kong, [52] information literacy or information technology was listed as a formal curriculum.

Japan

The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), and the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication (MIC) are two governmental ministries in Japan that are actively promoting Media and Information Literacy education. MEXT has set national curriculum guidelines surrounding use of information and communication technologies by students. MIC produces media literacy materials for formal and informal settings, as well as organized a study group to research "internet governance" for platforms and their services. [53]

Thailand

In 2003, as UNESCO promoted Media and Information Literacy education, media literacy was incorporated into the core curriculum of primary and secondary schools and in some higher education institutions in Thailand. [53]

The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Digital Economy and Society, Prasert Chantarawongthong, announced nine key initiatives for 2025 focused on enhancing digital literacy, bridging the digital divide, improving safety in digital interactions, and building public confidence in the digital ecosystem. [54]

Barriers

One barrier to learning to read is the lack of books, while a barrier to learning IML is the lack of technology access. Highlighting the value of IML helps to identify existing barriers within school infrastructure, staff development, and support systems. While there is a continued need to work on the foundations to provide a sustainable and equitable access, the biggest obstacle is school climate.

Marc Prensky [55] identifies one barrier as teachers viewing digital devices as distractions: "Let's admit the real reason that we ban cell phones is that, given the opportunity to use them, students would vote with their attention, just as adults would 'vote with their feet' by leaving the room when a presentation is not compelling."[ clarification needed ]

The mindset of banning new technology, and fearing the bad things that can happen, can affect educational decisions. The decision to ban digital devices impacts students for the rest of their lives.

Any tool that is used poorly or incorrectly can be unsafe. Safety lessons are mandatory in industrial technology and science. Yet safety or ethical lessons are not mandatory to use technology.

Not all decisions in schools are measured by common ground beliefs. One school district in Ontario banned digital devices from their schools. Local schools have been looking at doing the same. These kinds of reactions are often about immediate actions and not about teaching, learning or creating solutions. Many barriers to IML exist.

Key information literacies

Information literacies are the multiple literacies individuals may need to function effectively in the global information society. [21] The following are key information literacies.

Critical literacy
Critical literacy is the ability to actively analyse texts and media to identify underlying messages, taking into account context, perspective and possible biases. [56]
Computer literacy
Computer literacy is the ability to use computers and other digital devices efficiently enough to carry out basic or more advanced tasks. [57]
Copyright literacy
Copyright literacy is the ability to manage creative output and make appropriate use of the work of others, informed by knowledge of copyright, ownership, usage and other rights. [58]
Data literacy
Data literacy is the ability to gather, interpret and analyse data, and communicate insights and information from this analysis. Increasingly important in everyday life, over 80% of employers cite data literacy as a key skill for employees. [59]
Digital literacy
Digital literacy is the ability to use technology to manage and interact with digitized information, participate in online practice and originate digital work. [60]
Disaster literacy
Disaster literacy is an individual's ability to read, understand, and use information to make informed decisions and follow instructions in the context of mitigating, preparing, responding, and recovering from a disaster. [61]
Financial literacy
Financial literacy is the capacity of an individual to understand available banking products, services, laws and obligations, and make informed decisions on financial assets.
Health literacy
Health literacy is the ability of individuals to locate, understand, manage, and make appropriate use of information to help promote and maintain good health. [62] [63]
Media literacy
Media literacy is the ability to locate, critically evaluate, communicate with and make effective use of different types of media. [64]
Transliteracy
Transliteracy combines capabilities in information literacy, technology, creativity, communication and collaboration, critical thinking, practical skills and craft, to cross cultures, contexts, technologies and media. [65]
Visual literacy
Visual literacy is the ability to interpret and make meaning from visual information such as static or moving images, graphics, symbols, diagrams, maps. [66]
Web literacy
Web literacy is the ability to navigate the world wide web, interact effectively and thrive online, while managing online presence, privacy and risk. [67]

See also

Notes

  1. "Media and Information Literacy". Portal.unesco.org. Archived from the original on 2005-11-10. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  2. Archived February 4, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  3. "Media and Information Literacy (MIL): A Rendezvous with Information – Academic Libraries". ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in. Retrieved 2025-03-27.
  4. "Media and information literacy". unesdoc.unesco.org. Retrieved 2025-03-24.
  5. "Media and information literacy: policy and strategy guidelines". unesdoc.unesco.org. Retrieved 2025-03-27.
  6. Office, University of Salford Press (2009-10-19), What has the Internet ever done for us? , retrieved 2022-06-13
  7. "Information Literacy - WikEd". Archived from the original on April 22, 2009. Retrieved July 16, 2009.
  8. "About CML | Center for Media Literacy". Medialit.org. Archived from the original on 2010-08-25. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  9. Archived July 30, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  10. "Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework" (PDF). Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-05-30. Retrieved 2009-07-16.
  11. "Definitions". InformationLiteracy (InfoLit). Retrieved 2023-03-07.
  12. O'Connor, Barbara, et. al. (May 2002). Digital Transformation: A Framework for ICT Literacy. ICT Literacy Panel. http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/ICTREPORT.pdf
  13. Leaning, Marcus (2014). "Towards the Integration of Media and Information Literacy: A Rationale for a Twenty-first-century Approach". Media Literacy Education in Action (1st ed.). Routledge. pp. 97–102. ISBN   9780203076125.
  14. "Media Literacy + Information Literacy: Converging Spaces / Transcending Silos - The Journal of Media Literacy". International Council for Media Literacy. Retrieved 2025-03-01.
  15. "Cambridge Dictionary | English Dictionary, Translations & Thesaurus". dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved 2020-02-16.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Kinzer, Charles K.; Leu, Donald J. (2016), "New literacies, New Literacies", in Peters, Michael A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, Springer Singapore, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_111-1 , ISBN   978-981-287-532-7
  17. 1 2 UNESCO (2017). "Media and Information Curriculum for Teachers" (PDF).
  18. 1 2 JISC (2018). "Building digital capabilities: The six elements defined" (PDF).
  19. 1 2 Secker, Jane (2018-06-04). "The revised CILIP definition of information literacy". Journal of Information Literacy. 12 (1): 156. doi: 10.11645/12.1.2454 (inactive 26 January 2025). ISSN   1750-5968.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2025 (link)
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 van Laar, Ester; van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M.; van Dijk, Jan A. G. M.; de Haan, Jos (2017-07-01). "The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review". Computers in Human Behavior. 72: 577–588. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010. ISSN   0747-5632.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Lloyd, Annemaree (2017-06-05). "Information literacy and literacies of information: a mid-range theory and model". Journal of Information Literacy. 11 (1): 91–105. doi: 10.11645/11.1.2185 . ISSN   1750-5968.
  22. "Media and Information Literacy in the Digital Age". www.ebsco.com. Retrieved 2023-08-20.
  23. The New London Group (1996). "A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures". Harvard Educational Review. 66 (1): 60–93. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u. ISSN   0017-8055.
  24. Clarke, Jody; Dede, Chris (2008-10-20), "Robust Designs for Scalability", Learning and Instructional Technologies for the 21st Century, Springer US, pp. 1–22, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09667-4_3, ISBN   978-0-387-09666-7
  25. Knobel, Michele; Lankshear, Colin (2014). "Studying New Literacies". Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 58 (2): 97–101. doi:10.1002/jaal.314.
  26. Sang, Yuan (2017). "Expanded Territories of "Literacy": New Literacies and Multiliteracies". ResearchGate.
  27. Cambridge Assessment. (January 2013). What is literacy? An investigation into definitions of English as a subject and the relationship between English, literacy and 'being literate'. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/130433-what-is-literacy-an-investigation-into-definitions-of-english-as-a-subject-and-the-relationship-between-english-literacy-and-being-literate-.pdf
  28. "21st Century Skills - Mozilla Learning". learning.mozilla.org. Retrieved 2020-02-16.
  29. "Literacy by Design: Why is all This Technology so Important?". Archived from the original on September 27, 2007.
  30. Wilhelm, 2000, p. 4
  31. "MediaSmarts". Media-awareness.ca. Archived from the original on 2010-01-06. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  32. "MediaSmarts". Media-awareness.ca. Archived from the original on 2012-04-25. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  33. YCWW II, 2005a, para. 28
  34. Prensky, Marc. (October 2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, Vol. 9 (No.5). Published by MCB University Press. http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
  35. YCWW II, 2005b, p. 6
  36. YCWW II, 2005b, p. 8
  37. [ dead link ]
  38. "Language | Definition of language by Lexico". Oxford Dictionaries section 2 and 2.1. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on December 19, 2016. Retrieved December 10, 2018.
  39. "Science shows what's the best time to learn a foreign language". ZME Science. May 2018. Retrieved December 10, 2018.
  40. Baker, Colin (2011). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Multilingual Matters. p. 314. ISBN   9781847693563.
  41. Rojas-Estrada, Elizabeth-Guadalupe; Aguaded, Ignacio; García-Ruiz, Rosa (2024). "Media and Information Literacy in the Prescribed Curriculum: A Systematic Review on its Integration". Education and Information Technologies. 29 (8): 9445–9472. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12154-0 via SpringerLink.
  42. McDougall, Julian; Livingstone, Sonia; Sefton-Green, Julian; Fraser, Pete (1 May 2014). "Media and Information Literacy Policies in the UK" (PDF). Media@LSE.
  43. "Information Literacy Website – Brought to you by the CILIP Information Literacy Group".
  44. "Ofcom's three-year media literacy strategy". Ofcom. Retrieved 26 March 2025.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  45. "Battelle for Kids". Archived from the original on 2009-03-14. Retrieved 2009-07-16.
  46. "Battelle for Kids". Archived from the original on 2009-05-22. Retrieved 2009-07-16.
  47. "Information Literacy Curriculum" (PDF). Clarkstown Central School District. 2000-01-19. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-13. Retrieved 2009-07-16.
  48. "Information Technology K to 7 IRP (1996)" (PDF).
  49. Care, Ministry of Education and Child. "B.C. Performance Standards - Province of British Columbia". www2.gov.bc.ca.
  50. "Network for Media and Information Literacy in Mexico". Archived from the original on 2024-10-06. Retrieved 2025-03-01.
  51. "Masterplan for IT in Education - Masterplan Overview". Archived from the original on January 8, 2009. Retrieved July 16, 2009.
  52. "HONG KONG 2004 - Education". Yearbook.gov.hk. 2005-09-16. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  53. 1 2 Kajimoto, Masato; Kularb, Phansasiri; Guntarto, Bobi; Mohamed Salleh, Sabariah; Tuazon, Ramon; Torres, Therese Patricia; Palcon, Guillian Mae (2020). Media and information literacy education in Asia: exploration of policies and practices in Japan,Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. ISBN   978-92-9223-658-8.
  54. Dharmaraj, Samaya (December 28, 2024). "Digital Transformation: Thailand's Nine Key Initiatives for 2025". Open Gov Asia. Retrieved March 28, 2025.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  55. Marc Prensky 2006, para. 25
  56. Vasquez, Vivian Maria (2017-03-29). "Critical Literacy". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.20. ISBN   978-0-19-026409-3 . Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  57. "What does computer literacy mean?". www.definitions.net. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  58. "IFLA -- Accelerating Access: IFLA Releases Statement on Copyright Literacy". www.ifla.org. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  59. "A Data and Analytics Leader's Guide to Data Literacy". www.gartner.com. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  60. "Developing digital literacies". Jisc. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  61. Brown, Lisa M.; Haun, Jolie N.; Peterson, Lindsay (June 2014). "A Proposed Disaster Literacy Model". Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 8 (3): 267–275. doi:10.1017/dmp.2014.43. ISSN   1935-7893. PMID   24992944. S2CID   24971741.
  62. "WHO | Track 2: Health literacy and health behaviour". WHO. Archived from the original on May 15, 2010. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  63. Diamond, Lisa; Izquierdo, Karen; Canfield, Dana; Matsoukas, Konstantina; Gany, Francesca (2019). "A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes". Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34 (8): 1591–1606. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5. ISSN   0884-8734. PMC   6667611 . PMID   31147980.
  64. "What is media literacy, and why is it important?". www.commonsensemedia.org. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  65. Sukovic, Suzana (2017). Transliteracy in complex information environments. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing. ISBN   978-0-08-100901-7. OCLC   961456025.
  66. Serafini, Frank (2017-02-27). "Visual Literacy". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.19. ISBN   978-0-19-026409-3 . Retrieved 2020-03-31.
  67. "Web Literacy: Vital to Internet Health". Mozilla. Retrieved 2020-03-27.

References