Use of lyrics as evidence

Last updated

As of 2020, more than 500 criminal cases in the United States have used lyrics as evidence. [1] They are typically used to establish character, intent, or motive. Hip-hop lyrics have primarily been used, with first know instance of lyrics being used as evidence, were of hip-hop. Lyrics have since been used as evidence in the trials of rappers such as Tay-K, Young Thug, and YNW Melly, among others. Its use has been criticized.

Contents

History

The first known instance of hip-hop lyrics being used was in United States v. Foster (1991). Illinois resident Derek Foster, the defendant, was charged with Possession with the Intent to Distribute, after police found cocaine in his luggage as he exited a train. When searched, police found the lyrics "[k]ey for key, pound for pound. I'm the biggest dope dealer and I serve all over town" written in a notebook, for a song he planned to record later. Foster argued the lyrics described fictional events, though the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit saw the lyrics as motive and upheld his conviction. [2]

In State v. Cheeseboro (2001), Felix Cheeseboro of South Carolina was charged with armed robbery and murder. He wrote the song "The Ruckus" while awaiting trial, which described shooting and murder in several lyrics. The lyrics were seen as too ambigious and the evidence was dismissed. [2] Cook v. State (2001) reached the Arkansas Supreme Court, an aggrivated robbery case which also used lyrics as evidence. Despite having similarly ambiguous lyrics, he was found guilty. [2] The Kentucky Supreme Court also upheld the use of lyrics in Greene V. Commonwealth (2006), though the defendant's lyrics were more descript than those of his precedents. [2]

New Jersey v. Skinner (2014) is the primary precedent used when presenting lyrics as evidence. In 2008, Vonte Skinner was charged with murdering a rival drug dealer. He claimed to have been a witness, though not the murderer. Prosecutors used lyrics he wrote prior to the shooting as evidence, which were found in a notebook in the backseat of his car. The Supreme Court of New Jersey held that the lyrics were fictional, and that lyrics as evidence "[bear] little or no probative value as to any motive or intent behind the attempted murder offense with which [one is] charged". [2] [3]

In 2017, Tay-K had his lyrics presented as evidence, namely "The Race", which he had released while on the run form police. [4]

In 2023, the prosecution in the YSL Records racketeering trial were granted access to play the music of Young Thug, [5] which led to the song "Lifestyle" being played in the courtroom on January 11. [6] It has been criticized as a double standard. [7] Also in 2023, the prosecution in the trial of YNW Melly planned to introduce 55 of YNW Melly's songs – including "Murder on My Mind" – four album covers, and eightteen other recordings as evidence. [8]

Other rappers who have had their lyrics used as evidence include Mac Dre (1992), Snoop Dogg (1996), Boosie Badazz (2012), Bobby Shmurda (2014), Drakeo the Ruler (2018), and 6ix9ine (2019). [9] [10]

Legislation

On July 27, 2022, the Restoring Artistic Protection Act (RAP Act) was introduced to the United States House of Representatives by congressmen Jamaal Bowman and Hank Johnson. The bill would have expanded the First Amendment protections of musicians and prohibited the use of song lyrics as evidence. [1] The bill died, though was reintroduced to the house by sponsors from Johnson and Sydney Kamlager-Dove, with support from the nonprofit Free Our Art. The law has passed in the state legislatures of California and the Louisiana, and has been introduced in the state legislatures of Maryland, Missouri, New Hampshire, and New York. [11]

Analysis

The use of lyrics as court evidence is controversial. [4]

It has been argued that the commercialization of hip-hop and the push for more violent lyrics in the industry has led to rappers lying and exaggerating their lyrics. A distinction between the artist as an individual and the artist in their art is needed, as the actions described in their lyrics are often hyperbolic and metaphorical. Literal interpretation – typical practice when lyrics are presented as evidence – should not be done because of this. [12] [13] Its use as character evidence is also discouraged for this reason. [14]

The use of lyrics as evidence has been argued to be done as a result of racism in United States courts, as it has primarily been used in cases against rappers. [10] Hip-hop lyrics, whic are stereotypically violent and dangerous, are used in order to depict defendants as such. [13] The protection of lyrics under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution have been cited as reason against its use as evidence. [14] In 2024, the documentary As We Speak was released, which too argued that its use is racist. [15] [16]

References

  1. 1 2 "The RAP (Restoring Artistic Protection) Act Has Been Introduced In The House. Here's What It Means For Artists' First Amendment Rights. | RECORDINGACADEMY.com". www.recordingacademy.com. Retrieved 2025-10-13.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Herbert, Bennet (Spring 2023). "Rap on Trial: Rap Lyrics as Evidence in Criminal Cases". Arizona State University Sports and Entertainment Law Journal. 12 (2): 108–111 via HeinOnline.
  3. Brangham, William (2014-08-09). "New Jersey court strikes down murder conviction based on violent rap lyrics". PBS News Hour . Retrieved 2025-10-13.
  4. 1 2 Younger, Briana (2019-09-20). "The Controversial Use of Rap Lyrics as Evidence". The New Yorker. ISSN   0028-792X . Retrieved 2025-10-13.
  5. "Young Thug Lyrics Will Be Allowed as Evidence in YSL RICO Trial (Published 2023)". 2023-11-09. Retrieved 2025-10-13.
  6. "Young Thug's 'Lifestyle' played in court as Atlanta rapper faces RICO charges". USA Today . Retrieved 2025-10-13.
  7. Valencia, maxime tamsett, Nick (2023-11-10). "Some rap lyrics will be allowed in YSL RICO case, judge rules. Why critics have called that a double standard". CNN. Retrieved 2025-10-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. Helmore, Edward (2023-12-17). "Rapper YNW Melly's lyrics could be used against him in double murder retrial". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2025-10-13.
  9. "Lyrics On Trial: A History Of Rap Bars Used In Court and How Precedent May Effect Young Thug's Fate". BET. Retrieved 2025-10-14.
  10. 1 2 Marie, Erika (2024-02-28). "Exhibit A: Criminal Court Cases That Put Rap Lyrics On Trial". HotNewHipHop. Retrieved 2025-10-14.
  11. Gee, Andre (2025-07-24). "These New Bills Aim to Prevent Rap Lyrics From Being Used in Court Nationwide". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 2025-10-13.
  12. Huff, Dre'Kevius O. (2018). "Rap on Trial: the Case for Nonliteral Interpretation of Rap Lyrics". Savannah Law Review . 5 (1): 336, 338 via HeinOnline.
  13. 1 2 Stoia, Nicholas; Adams, Kyle; Drakulich, Kevin (October 2018). "Rap Lyrics as Evidence: What Can Music Theory Tell Us". Race and Justice. 8 (4): 330, 333 via HeinOnline.
  14. 1 2 Ebisike, Norbert (2018). "Control, Crime and Culture: Rap Lyrics and Videos as Criminal Evidence". Journal of Law and Social Deviance. 16: 53, 54, 56 via HeinOnline.
  15. Kenigsberg, Ben (2024-02-28). "'As We Speak': Rap Music on Trial' Review: Weaponizing Lyrics in Court (Published 2024)". The New York Times . Retrieved 2025-10-13.
  16. Horton, Adrian (2024-02-27). "'It has become a sort of silver bullet': why are rap lyrics being put on trial?". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2025-10-13.

Further reading