Variant of uncertain significance

Last updated

A variant of uncertain (or unknown) significance (VUS) is a genetic variant that has been identified through genetic testing but whose significance to the function or health of an organism is not known. [1] Two related terms are "gene of uncertain significance" (GUS), which refers to a gene that has been identified through genome sequencing but whose connection to a human disease has not been established, and "insignificant mutation", referring to a gene variant that has no impact on the health or function of an organism. The term "variant' is favored in clinical practice over "mutation" because it can be used to describe an allele more precisely (i.e. without inherently connoting pathogenicity). When the variant has no impact on health, it is called a "benign variant". When it is associated with a disease, it is called a "pathogenic variant". A "pharmacogenomic variant" has an effect only when an individual takes a particular drug and therefore is neither benign nor pathogenic. [1]

Contents

A VUS is most commonly encountered by people when they get the results of a lab test looking for a mutation in a particular gene. For example, many people know that mutations in the BRCA1 gene are involved in the development of breast cancer because of the publicity surrounding Angelina Jolie's preventative treatment. [2] Few people are aware of the immense number of other genetic variants in and around BRCA1 and other genes that may predispose to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A recent study of the genes ATM , BRCA1, BRCA2 , CDH1, CHEK2 , PALB2 and TP53 found 15,311 DNA sequence variants in only 102 patients. [3] Many of those 15,311 variants have no significant phenotypic effect. That is, a difference can be seen in the DNA sequence, but the differences have no effect on the growth or health of the person. [3]

Identifying variants that are significant or likely to be significant is a difficult task that may require expert human and in silico analysis, laboratory experiments and even information theory. [3] In spite of those efforts, many people may be worried about their particular VUS, even though it has not been determined to be significant or likely to be significant. Most discovered VUSs will not be investigated in a peer-reviewed research paper, as this effort is usually reserved for likely pathogenic variants.[ citation needed ]

History

In 2001, an initial draft of the human genome was published by the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. [4] With the development of next-generation sequencing, the cost of sequencing has plummeted and the number of human genomes and exomes sequenced each year is increasing dramatically. [5] As of 2017, the cost of a quality whole genome sequence is $1,000 or less. [6] If the ratio of approximately 20 DNA sequence variants per gene [3] holds over the entire genome (with approximately 20,000 genes) that means that every person who elects to have their genome sequenced will be provided with almost half a million Variants of Unknown Significance. To assist people to understand the meaning of all these variants, classification is a first step.[ citation needed ]

Classification

Since the Human Genome Project first sequenced the human genome in 2001 at a cost of US$100 million, costs have fallen precipitously, outpacing even Moore's law, and were [?]US$1,000 in 2015. More widely available genome sequencing has led to more available data on variants of uncertain significance. Cost per Genome.png
Since the Human Genome Project first sequenced the human genome in 2001 at a cost of US$100 million, costs have fallen precipitously, outpacing even Moore's law, and were ≈US$1,000 in 2015. More widely available genome sequencing has led to more available data on variants of uncertain significance.

In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) published a third revision of their guidelines on variant interpretation in Mendelian disorders. [1] The publication recommended the following categories: pathogenic, likely pathogenic, uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign. This guideline is one of many resources published by the ACMG in hopes of improving standardization of variant interpretation and reporting. [1] [7] [8] [9] [10]

As of 2020, there continues to be limited involvement from federal agencies to regulate the clinical validity (accuracy) and utility (risks and benefits) of genetic testing. [11] [12] [13] Variant interpretation and classification is notably subjective, as laboratories developed their own criteria prior to the ACMG-AMP guidelines. [8] [9] [14] This subjectiveness is further problematic when there is evidence that variant significance changes over time. [13] Due to the lack of consistency in official guidelines, the genomics community is left struggling to efficiently categorize genetic variants. [9] [15] [16]

Pathogenic

This category is for variants that are well-documented to cause disease.[ citation needed ]

Likely pathogenic

This category is for variants where the evidence is compelling, but not definitive, to cause disease.[ citation needed ]

Uncertain significance

This category is for variants where there is unknown or conflicting clinical significance. Additional evidence is needed in order to determine whether or not the variant is causative for a particular disease.[ citation needed ]

Likely benign

This category is for variants that are not causative for a disease.[ citation needed ]

Benign

This category is for variants that are not causative for a disease. Benign variants are usually seen previously in higher frequencies and in silico analysis predicts a benign effect on the encoded protein.[ citation needed ]

Limitations of the classifications

Less than 5% of the human genome encodes proteins, and the rest is associated with non-coding RNA molecules, regulatory DNA sequences, LINEs, SINEs, introns, and sequences for which as yet no function has been determined. [4] Thus, only a small fraction of the almost half-million VUS's that are expected to be identified by whole genome sequencing can be categorized into the 5 categories above, leaving the patient nearly as uninformed about their variants as they would have been without this information.[ citation needed ]

Most of the base sequences regulating gene expression are found outside of protein-coding sequences, either within introns or outside of genes in intergenic regions. Changes in those regulatory regions can lead to dysfunction of a gene(s) and produce phenotypic effects that can be relevant to health and function. [17]

An example of a variant in an intergenic enhancer is one that is associated with blond hair color in northern Europeans. The variant in an enhancer of the KITLG gene causes only a 20% change in gene expression, yet causes hair lightening. [17] [18]

An example of an intronic VUS controlling gene expression is the SNP found in an intron of the FTO gene. The FTO gene encodes the fat mass and obesity-associated protein, and the SNP (or VUS) found in its intron was shown by genome-wide association studies to be associated with an increased risk for obesity and diabetes. The initial assumption was that this mutation was misregulating FTO to cause the disease risk. However, it was later shown that the intronic variant was in fact regulating the distant IRX3 gene and not the FTO gene. [19] That is just one example of how difficult it can be to determine the significance of a VUS even when many research labs are focused on it, and it illustrates that clinicians cannot reliably interpret genetic results that have not been fully clarified by prior research.[ citation needed ]

Applications

The number of VUS reports makes it impossible to mention all such reports. To give a flavor for some applications in one field, it is perhaps of most interest to focus on breast cancer. Remember, this is only a fraction of the information available world-wide about VUS reports related to breast cancer, and as always, your results may vary.[ citation needed ]

In a 2009 US study of over 200 women who received BRCA VUS reports and were surveyed for one year thereafter, distress over the result persisted for the year. [20]

A 2012 survey of patient outcomes in the Netherlands found that, after genetic counseling for BRCA VUS, patients perceived themselves to have different cancer risks than what had been explained to them by genetic counselors, and that this misperception influenced decisions about radical medical procedures. [21]

In a 2015 study in the UK, where BRCA VUSs occur in 10-20% of tests, 39% of breast cancer specialists taking part in the study did not know how to explain a VUS report to a patient with no family history, and 71% were unsure about the clinical implications of the test reports. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetic testing</span> Medical test

Genetic testing, also known as DNA testing, is used to identify changes in DNA sequence or chromosome structure. Genetic testing can also include measuring the results of genetic changes, such as RNA analysis as an output of gene expression, or through biochemical analysis to measure specific protein output. In a medical setting, genetic testing can be used to diagnose or rule out suspected genetic disorders, predict risks for specific conditions, or gain information that can be used to customize medical treatments based on an individual's genetic makeup. Genetic testing can also be used to determine biological relatives, such as a child's biological parentage through DNA paternity testing, or be used to broadly predict an individual's ancestry. Genetic testing of plants and animals can be used for similar reasons as in humans, to gain information used for selective breeding, or for efforts to boost genetic diversity in endangered populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BRCA1</span> Gene known for its role in breast cancer

Breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein is a protein that in humans is encoded by the BRCA1 gene. Orthologs are common in other vertebrate species, whereas invertebrate genomes may encode a more distantly related gene. BRCA1 is a human tumor suppressor gene and is responsible for repairing DNA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medical genetics</span> Medicine focused on hereditary disorders

Medical genetics is the branch of medicine that involves the diagnosis and management of hereditary disorders. Medical genetics differs from human genetics in that human genetics is a field of scientific research that may or may not apply to medicine, while medical genetics refers to the application of genetics to medical care. For example, research on the causes and inheritance of genetic disorders would be considered within both human genetics and medical genetics, while the diagnosis, management, and counselling people with genetic disorders would be considered part of medical genetics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Incidental medical findings</span>

Incidental medical findings are previously undiagnosed medical or psychiatric conditions that are discovered unintentionally and during evaluation for a medical or psychiatric condition. Such findings may occur in a variety of settings, including routine medical care, during biomedical research, during post-mortem autopsy, or during genetic testing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary-Claire King</span> American geneticist

Mary-Claire King is an American geneticist. She was the first to show that breast cancer can be inherited due to mutations in the gene she called BRCA1. She studies human genetics and is particularly interested in genetic heterogeneity and complex traits. She studies the interaction of genetics and environmental influences and their effects on human conditions such as breast and ovarian cancer, inherited deafness, schizophrenia, HIV, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. She has been the American Cancer Society Professor of the Department of Genome Sciences and of Medical Genetics in the Department of Medicine at the University of Washington since 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oncogenomics</span> Sub-field of genomics

Oncogenomics is a sub-field of genomics that characterizes cancer-associated genes. It focuses on genomic, epigenomic and transcript alterations in cancer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Myriad Genetics</span> American biotechnology company

Myriad Genetics, Inc. is an American genetic testing and precision medicine company based in Salt Lake City, Utah, United States. Myriad employs a number of proprietary technologies that permit doctors and patients to understand the genetic basis of human disease and the role that genes play in the onset, progression and treatment of disease. This information is used to guide the development of new products that assess an individual's risk for developing disease later in life, identify a patient's likelihood of responding to a particular drug therapy, assess a patient's risk of disease progression and disease recurrence, and measure disease activity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hereditary breast–ovarian cancer syndrome</span> Medical condition

Hereditary breast–ovarian cancer syndromes (HBOC) are cancer syndromes that produce higher than normal levels of breast cancer, ovarian cancer and additional cancers in genetically related families. It accounts for 90% of the hereditary cancers. The hereditary factors may be proven or suspected to cause the pattern of breast and ovarian cancer occurrences in the family. The name HBOC may be misleading because it implies that this genetic susceptibility to cancer is mainly in women. In reality, both sexes have the same rates of gene mutations and HBOC can predispose to other cancers including prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer. For this reason, the term "King syndrome" has recently come into use. The new name references Mary-Claire King who identified the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Personal genomics or consumer genetics is the branch of genomics concerned with the sequencing, analysis and interpretation of the genome of an individual. The genotyping stage employs different techniques, including single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis chips, or partial or full genome sequencing. Once the genotypes are known, the individual's variations can be compared with the published literature to determine likelihood of trait expression, ancestry inference and disease risk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PALB2</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Partner and localizer of BRCA2, also known as PALB2 or FANCN, is a protein which in humans is encoded by the PALB2 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whole genome sequencing</span> Determining nearly the entirety of the DNA sequence of an organisms genome at a single time

Whole genome sequencing (WGS), also known as full genome sequencing, complete genome sequencing, or entire genome sequencing, is the process of determining the entirety, or nearly the entirety, of the DNA sequence of an organism's genome at a single time. This entails sequencing all of an organism's chromosomal DNA as well as DNA contained in the mitochondria and, for plants, in the chloroplast.

Cancer genome sequencing is the whole genome sequencing of a single, homogeneous or heterogeneous group of cancer cells. It is a biochemical laboratory method for the characterization and identification of the DNA or RNA sequences of cancer cell(s).

<i>BRCA</i> mutation Medical condition

A BRCA mutation is a mutation in either of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which are tumour suppressor genes. Hundreds of different types of mutations in these genes have been identified, some of which have been determined to be harmful, while others have no proven impact. Harmful mutations in these genes may produce a hereditary breast–ovarian cancer syndrome in affected persons. Only 5–10% of breast cancer cases in women are attributed to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, but the impact on women with the gene mutation is more profound. Women with harmful mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 have a risk of breast cancer that is about five times the normal risk, and a risk of ovarian cancer that is about ten to thirty times normal. The risk of breast and ovarian cancer is higher for women with a high-risk BRCA1 mutation than with a BRCA2 mutation. Having a high-risk mutation does not guarantee that the woman will develop any type of cancer, or imply that any cancer that appears was actually caused by the mutation, rather than some other factor.

DECIPHER is a web-based resource and database of genomic variation data from analysis of patient DNA. It documents submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities and pathogenic sequence variants, from over 25000 patients and maps them to the human genome using Ensembl or UCSC Genome Browser. In addition it catalogues the clinical characteristics from each patient and maintains a database of microdeletion/duplication syndromes, together with links to relevant scientific reports and support groups.

Sir Bruce Anthony John Ponder FMedSci FAACR FRS FRCP is an English geneticist and cancer researcher. He is Emeritus Professor of Oncology at the University of Cambridge and former director of the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute and of the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Cancer Centre.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hereditary cancer syndrome</span> Inherited genetic condition that predisposes a person to cancer

A hereditary cancer syndrome is a genetic disorder in which inherited genetic mutations in one or more genes predispose the affected individuals to the development of cancer and may also cause early onset of these cancers. Hereditary cancer syndromes often show not only a high lifetime risk of developing cancer, but also the development of multiple independent primary tumors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Molecular diagnostics</span> Collection of techniques used to analyze biological markers in the genome and proteome

Molecular diagnostics is a collection of techniques used to analyze biological markers in the genome and proteome, and how their cells express their genes as proteins, applying molecular biology to medical testing. In medicine the technique is used to diagnose and monitor disease, detect risk, and decide which therapies will work best for individual patients, and in agricultural biosecurity similarly to monitor crop- and livestock disease, estimate risk, and decide what quarantine measures must be taken.

Melissa Suzanne Cline is an American biologist. She is an Associate Research Scientist at the UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute Between June 2001 and December 2004 she was a staff scientist at Affymetrix, Inc. in Emeryville, California where she was involved in developing ANOSVA, a "statistical method to identify alternative spicing from expression data," during which she "analyzed the effects of alternative splicing on protein transmembrane and signal peptide regions". Subsequently, she moved to UC Santa Cruz, where she wrote on genome browsing. According to the Thomson Reuters report, she was one of the most highly cited scientists in the world in 2012/13.

Elective genetic and genomic testing are DNA tests performed for an individual who does not have an indication for testing. An elective genetic test analyzes selected sites in the human genome while an elective genomic test analyzes the entire human genome. Some elective genetic and genomic tests require a physician to order the test to ensure that individuals understand the risks and benefits of testing as well as the results. Other DNA-based tests, such as a genealogical DNA test do not require a physician's order. Elective testing is generally not paid for by health insurance companies. With the advent of personalized medicine, also called precision medicine, an increasing number of individuals are undertaking elective genetic and genomic testing.

Personalized onco-genomics (POG) is the field of oncology and genomics that is focused on using whole genome analysis to make personalized clinical treatment decisions. The program was devised at British Columbia's BC Cancer Agency and is currently being led by Marco Marra and Janessa Laskin. Genome instability has been identified as one of the underlying hallmarks of cancer. The genetic diversity of cancer cells promotes multiple other cancer hallmark functions that help them survive in their microenvironment and eventually metastasise. The pronounced genomic heterogeneity of tumours has led researchers to develop an approach that assesses each individual's cancer to identify targeted therapies that can halt cancer growth. Identification of these "drivers" and corresponding medications used to possibly halt these pathways are important in cancer treatment.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. (May 2015). "Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology". guideline. Genetics in Medicine. 17 (5): 405–24. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30. PMC   4544753 . PMID   25741868.
  2. ↑ Reinberg S. "Angelina Jolie's Mastectomy and Gene Testing Rise". WebMD. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Mucaki EJ, Caminsky NG, Perri AM, Lu R, Laederach A, Halvorsen M, et al. (April 2016). "A unified analytic framework for prioritization of non-coding variants of uncertain significance in heritable breast and ovarian cancer". primary. BMC Medical Genomics. 9: 19. doi: 10.1186/s12920-016-0178-5 . PMC   4828881 . PMID   27067391.
  4. 1 2 Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, et al. (February 2001). "Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome" (PDF). Nature. 409 (6822): 860–921. Bibcode:2001Natur.409..860L. doi: 10.1038/35057062 . PMID   11237011.
  5. ↑ "Next Generation Sequencing Market Size, Share, Analysis Report". Grand View Research, Inc. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
  6. ↑ Kühnemund M, Wei Q, Darai E, Wang Y, Hernández-Neuta I, Yang Z, et al. (January 2017). "Targeted DNA sequencing and in situ mutation analysis using mobile phone microscopy". primary. Nature Communications. 8: 13913. Bibcode:2017NatCo...813913K. doi:10.1038/ncomms13913. PMC   5247573 . PMID   28094784.
  7. ↑ "Medical Genetics Practice Resources". www.acmg.net. Retrieved 23 November 2020.
  8. 1 2 Kim YE, Ki CS, Jang MA (September 2019). "Challenges and Considerations in Sequence Variant Interpretation for Mendelian Disorders". Annals of Laboratory Medicine. 39 (5): 421–429. doi:10.3343/alm.2019.39.5.421. PMC   6502951 . PMID   31037860.
  9. 1 2 3 Amendola LM, Jarvik GP, Leo MC, McLaughlin HM, Akkari Y, Amaral MD, et al. (June 2016). "Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium". American Journal of Human Genetics. 98 (6): 1067–1076. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024. PMC   4908185 . PMID   27181684.
  10. ↑ Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. (February 2020). "Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)". Genetics in Medicine. 22 (2): 245–257. doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8. PMC   7313390 . PMID   31690835.
  11. ↑ "Regulation of Genetic Tests". NIH. National Human Genome Research Institute. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  12. ↑ Burke W (April 2014). "Genetic tests: clinical validity and clinical utility". Current Protocols in Human Genetics. 81: 9.15.1–8. doi:10.1002/0471142905.hg0915s81. PMC   4084965 . PMID   24763995.
  13. 1 2 Evans BJ, Javitt G, Hall R, Robertson M, Ossorio P, Wolf SM, et al. (March 2020). "How Can Law and Policy Advance Quality in Genomic Analysis and Interpretation for Clinical Care?". The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 48 (1): 44–68. doi:10.1177/1073110520916995. PMC   7447152 . PMID   32342785.
  14. ↑ Hoskinson DC, Dubuc AM, Mason-Suares H (February 2017). "The current state of clinical interpretation of sequence variants". Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 42: 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2017.01.001. PMC   5446800 . PMID   28157586.
  15. ↑ Amendola LM, Dorschner MO, Robertson PD, Salama JS, Hart R, Shirts BH, et al. (March 2015). "Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification". Genome Research. 25 (3): 305–15. doi:10.1101/gr.183483.114. PMC   4352885 . PMID   25637381.
  16. ↑ Hoffman-Andrews L (December 2017). "The known unknown: the challenges of genetic variants of uncertain significance in clinical practice". Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 4 (3): 648–657. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsx038 . PMC   5965500 . PMID   29868193.
  17. 1 2 Khurana E, Fu Y, Chakravarty D, Demichelis F, Rubin MA, Gerstein M (February 2016). "Role of non-coding sequence variants in cancer". Nature Reviews. Genetics. 17 (2): 93–108. doi:10.1038/nrg.2015.17. PMID   26781813. S2CID   14433306.
  18. ↑ Guenther CA, Tasic B, Luo L, Bedell MA, Kingsley DM (July 2014). "A molecular basis for classic blond hair color in Europeans". Nature Genetics. 46 (7): 748–52. doi:10.1038/ng.2991. PMC   4704868 . PMID   24880339.
  19. ↑ Smemo S, Tena JJ, Kim KH, Gamazon ER, Sakabe NJ, Gómez-Marín C, et al. (March 2014). "Obesity-associated variants within FTO form long-range functional connections with IRX3". Nature. 507 (7492): 371–5. Bibcode:2014Natur.507..371S. doi:10.1038/nature13138. PMC   4113484 . PMID   24646999.
  20. ↑ O'Neill SC, Rini C, Goldsmith RE, Valdimarsdottir H, Cohen LH, Schwartz MD (October 2009). "Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes". Psycho-Oncology. 18 (10): 1088–96. doi:10.1002/pon.1467. PMC   3503506 . PMID   19214961.
  21. ↑ Vos J, Gómez-García E, Oosterwijk JC, Menko FH, Stoel RD, van Asperen CJ, et al. (January 2012). "Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result". primary. Psycho-Oncology. 21 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1002/pon.1864. PMID   21072753. S2CID   206373791.
  22. ↑ Eccles BK, Copson E, Maishman T, Abraham JE, Eccles DM (November 2015). "Understanding of BRCA VUS genetic results by breast cancer specialists". BMC Cancer. 15: 936. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1934-1 . PMC   4660681 . PMID   26608569.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.