Wingnut (politics)

Last updated

"Wingnut", wing nut or wing-nut, is a pejorative American political term referring to a person who holds extreme, and often irrational, political views. It is a reference to the extreme "wings" of a party, and shares a name with the hardware fastener also known as a wingnut.

Contents

Definitions and etymology

According to Merriam-Webster, a "wingnut" is "a mentally deranged person" or "one who advocates extreme measures or changes: radical". [1] Lexico, an online dictionary whose content comes from Oxford University Press, gives the political definition of "wing nut" as "A person with extreme, typically right-wing, views." [2]

A hardware wingnut tightened to a bolt to act as a fastener. 2015-03-07 - Thinktank - Sasha Taylor - 116.JPG
A hardware wingnut tightened to a bolt to act as a fastener.

When William Safire who was widely known as the "language maven" [3] and wrote the "On Language" column for The New York Times Magazine from 1979 until 2009 [4] first wrote about "wing nut" in 2004, he said "In current political parlance ... the word is now beginning its bid to replace the tiring extremist. ... The true believers of each side consider those similarly inclined on the other to be nuts and kooks, a satisfying arrangement of derangement. ... The attack word catching on with political nonwingers and by mainstreaming media is wing nut. It is applied with supposed fine impartiality to both left-wing kooks and right-wing nuts", [5] but by 2006, Safire would say "The prevailing put-down of right-wing bloggers is wingnuts; this has recently been countered by the vilification of left-wing partisans who use the Web as moonbats..." [6] Later that year, Safire provided an example of the usage of "wingnut" in a Time magazine column by Joe Klein, in which Klein referred to "conservative wingnuts" (as opposed to "left-wing blognuts"), called Vice President Dick Cheney "the nation’s wingnut in chief", and said of the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal that it was "quasi-wingnut". [7]

Two years later, in his book Safire's Political Dictionary, Safire was more definitive about the meaning and etymology of the word:

...[T]he political wingnut is an abbreviation of a longer term, in this case right-wing nut where nut, as slang for the head, has long been used to refer to a person who is silly, stupid, crazy, or simply nutty. ... The original right-wing nut is of considerable antiquity, dating at least to the 1960s...Today, the long and the short forms co-exist amicably in print. [8]

David M. Herszenhorn of The New York Times has defined a "wing nut" as "a loud darling of cable television and talk radio whose remarks are outrageous but often serious enough not to be dismissed entirely," but he was careful to point out that the person he was so describing as a "wing nut" "...is the more notable because he hurls his nuts from the left in a winger world long associated with the right." [9]

In his book Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe is Hijacking America, author and columnist John Avlon defined a wingnut as "someone on the far-right wing or far-left wing of the political spectrum the professional partisans, the unhinged activists and the paranoid conspiracy theorists. They're the people who always try to divide rather than unite us". [10] Avlon also writes "I believe that the far left and the far right can be equally insane but there's no question that in the first years of the Obama administration, the far right has been a lot crazier."

The examples Avlon gives of this "craziness" include the actions, beliefs and behaviors of those involved in the Oath Keepers, Posse Comitatus and other groups in the American militia movement, the Tea Party, "Obama derangement syndrome", the birth of "White-minority politics", the rise of right-wing media and the Republican echo chamber, Sarah Palin and the "Limbaugh brigades" of right-wing talk radio hosts, the Birther and Truther movements, and the GOP's "hyperconservative kamikaze caucus" in Congress. The only extended sections about "wingnuts" on the left deal with Keith Olbermann's news broadcasts, and the search by both sides for "heretics" within their respective parties, i.e Republicans in Name Only and Democrats in Name Only (RINOs and DINOs). [11]

"Wingnut welfare"

In 2015, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote in his The New York Times column about "wingnut welfare". Krugman did not claim to have come up with the term, and did not know who did, [notes 1] but he explained it as describing "the lavishly-funded ecosystem of billionaire-financed think tanks, media outlets, and so on [which] provides a comfortable cushion for politicians and pundits who tell such people what they want to hear. Lose an election, make economic forecasts that turn out laughably wrong, whatever — no matter, there’s always a fallback job available." Krugman wrote that "anyone who follows right-wing careers knows whereof I speak." [12] In 2021, Krugman reiterated his use of the phrase in another column, in which he wrote:

[F]or a long time conservative cohesiveness made life relatively easy for Republican politicians and officials. Professional Democrats had to negotiate their way among sometimes competing demands from various constituencies. All Republicans had to do was follow the party line. Loyalty would be rewarded with safe seats, and should a Republican in good standing somehow happen to lose an election, support from billionaires meant that there was a safety net — “wing nut welfare” — in the form of chairs at lavishly funded right-wing think tanks, gigs at Fox News and so on. [13]

The phrase has subsequently been used elsewhere, including in 2017 in the Washington Monthly by Martin Longman [14] and in an opinion column in The Washington Post by political commentator Paul Waldman in 2018. [15]

In 2021, writer Charles P. Pierce, the author of Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free described the career of one Texas political lawyer by saying "His CV reads like a road map through the wingnut-welfare legal terrarium". [16] Pierce had also used the phrase in earlier columns in 2018 [17] and 2020 [18] in describing the actions and backgrounds of those on the political right.

Other usage examples

In 2007, political commentator Jonathan Chait's recapitulation of the origin of Reaganomics, or supply-side economics, was published in The New Republic under the title "Feast of the Wingnuts". After describing some extreme applications of the Laffer curve made by Jude Wanniski, an editorial page writer for The Wall Street Journal in the 1970s, specifically in his book The Way the World Works (1978), Chait writes "Republicans did not find these obvious signs of wingnuttery troubling." [19]

Folk punk musician Pat the Bunny founded a band called Wingnut Dishwashes Union, active from 2007 to 2009.[ citation needed ]

Tessa Stuart, writing in Rolling Stone magazine in 2016 referred to the Republican National Convention that year as having embraced "just about every version of 'Hillary Clinton' dreamed up over the last quarter century by wing-nuts like [Alex] Jones and his rhetorical cousin, Roger Stone. Needless to say, none of these 'Hillary Clintons' bear much resemblance to the Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail, nor would they be recognizable to people who don’t pay much attention to right-wing talk radio." [20]

In 2020, historian and columnist Max Boot referred to an incoming member of Congress as a "QAnon wing nut", providing an example of the combination of "wing nut" with other pejorative descriptive modifiers. Boot also warned against a false equivalence, writing that "the media can give the impression, wittingly or not, that both major parties are in the grip of extremists. Nothing could be further from the truth. Democrats have the far left under control, while Republicans are being controlled by the far right." Such a view distorts the reality that the Republican Party under the leadership of Donald Trump is dominated by far-right ideologues and extremists that is, wingnuts while there is no such equivalent in the Democratic Party. Boot continued, "Trump & Co. can bellow all day long that [ Joe Biden and Kamala Harris ] are lackeys for [Senator Bernie] Sanders and "the Squad," [i.e. six progressive Democratic members of Congress, notably including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), a Democratic socialist ] but it’s simply not credible. The Republican Party, by contrast, isn’t just catering to extremists — it’s led by one." [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

Radical centrism, also called the radical center, the radical centre, and the radical middle, is a concept that arose in Western nations in the late 20th century. The radical in the term refers to a willingness on the part of most radical centrists to call for fundamental reform of institutions. The centrism refers to a belief that genuine solutions require realism and pragmatism, not just idealism and emotion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Safire</span> American journalist and presidential speechwriter (1929–2009)

William Lewis Safire was an American author, columnist, journalist, and presidential speechwriter. He was a long-time syndicated political columnist for The New York Times and wrote the "On Language" column in The New York Times Magazine about popular etymology, new or unusual usages, and other language-related topics.

Compassionate conservatism is an American political philosophy that stresses using conservative techniques and concepts in order to improve the general welfare of society. The philosophy supports the implementation of policies designed to help the disadvantaged and alleviate poverty through the free market, envisaging a triangular relationship between government, charities and faith-based organizations. The term entered mainstream parlance between 2001 and 2009, during the administration of US President George W. Bush. He used the term often to describe his personal views and embody some parts of his administration's agenda and policy approach.

"Vast right-wing conspiracy" is a phrase popularized by a 1995 memo by political opposition researcher Chris Lehane and then referenced in 1998 by the then First Lady of the United States Hillary Rodham Clinton, in defense of her husband, President Bill Clinton, characterizing the continued allegations of scandal against her and her husband, including the Lewinsky scandal, as part of a conspiracy by Clinton's political enemies. The term has been used since, including in a question posed to Bill Clinton in 2009 to describe verbal attacks on Barack Obama during his early presidency. Hillary Clinton mentioned it again during her 2016 presidential campaign.

Democrat Party is an epithet and pejorative for the Democratic Party of the United States, often used in a disparaging fashion by the party's opponents. While use of the term started out as non-hostile, it has grown in its negative use since the 1940s, in particular by members of the Republican Party—in party platforms, partisan speeches, and press releases—as well as by conservative commentators and third party politicians.

"Moonbat" is a pejorative political epithet used in United States politics, referring to liberals, progressives, or leftists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jonathan Chait</span> American political commentator

Jonathan Chait is an American pundit and writer for New York magazine. He was previously a senior editor at The New Republic and an assistant editor of The American Prospect. He writes a periodic column in the Los Angeles Times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Avlon</span> American journalist

John Phillips Avlon is an American journalist, political commentator, and Democratic political candidate. He is a senior political analyst and anchor at CNN and was the editor-in-chief and managing director of The Daily Beast from 2013 to 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alternative media (U.S. political right)</span> American conservative journalism

The term right-wing alternative media in the United States usually refers to internet, talk radio, print, and television journalism. They are defined by their presentation of opinions from a conservative or right wing point of view and politicized reporting as a counter to what they describe as a liberal bias of mainstream media.

American Thinker is a daily online magazine dealing with American politics from a politically conservative viewpoint. It was founded in 2003 by attorney Ed Lasky, health-care consultant Richard Baehr, and sociologist Thomas Lifson, and initially became prominent in the lead-up to the 2008 U.S. presidential election for its attacks on then-candidate Barack Obama. The magazine has been described as a conservative blog. The Southern Poverty Law Center has called the site "a not so thoughtful far-right online publication".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Paranoid Style in American Politics</span> 1964 essay by Richard J. Hofstadter

"The Paranoid Style in American Politics" is an essay by American historian Richard Hofstadter, first published in Harper's Magazine in November 1964. It was the title essay in a book by the author the following year. Published soon after Arizona senator Barry Goldwater won the Republican Party presidential nomination over the more moderate Nelson Rockefeller, Hofstadter's article explores the influence of a particular style of conspiracy theory and "movements of suspicious discontent" throughout American history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amity Shlaes</span> American writer

Amity Ruth Shlaes is an American conservative author, writer, and columnist. Shlaes has written five books, including three New York Times Bestsellers. She currently chairs the board of trustees of the Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation and serves as a Presidential Scholar at The King's College in New York City. She is a recipient of the Bastiat Prize and, more recently, the Bradley Prize.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Margaret Hoover</span> American political commentator (born 1977)

Margaret Claire Hoover is an American conservative political commentator, political strategist, media personality, author, and great-granddaughter of Herbert Hoover, the 31st U.S. president. She is author of the book American Individualism: How A New Generation of Conservatives Can Save the Republican Party, published by Crown Forum in 2011. Hoover hosts PBS's reboot of the conservative interview show Firing Line.

Movement conservatism is a term used by political analysts to describe conservatives in the United States since the mid-20th century and the New Right. According to George H. Nash (2009) the movement comprises a coalition of five distinct impulses. From the mid-1930s to the 1960s, libertarians, traditionalists, and anti-communists made up this coalition, with the goal of fighting the liberals' New Deal. In the 1970s, two more impulses were added with the addition of neoconservatives and the religious right.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horseshoe theory</span> Alleged similarity of the far-left and far-right

In popular discourse, the horseshoe theory asserts that the far-left and the far-right, rather than being at opposite and opposing ends of a linear continuum of the political spectrum, closely resemble each other, analogous to the way that the opposite ends of a horseshoe are close together. The theory is attributed to the French philosopher and writer of fiction and poetry Jean-Pierre Faye in his 2002 book Le Siècle des idéologies.

On Language was a regular column in the weekly New York Times Magazine on the English language discussing popular etymology, new or unusual usages, and other language-related topics. The inaugural column was published on February 18, 1979 and it was a regular popular feature. Many of the columns were collected in books.

In the politics of the United States, the radical right is a political preference that leans towards ultraconservatism, white nationalism, white supremacy, or other far-right ideologies in a hierarchical structure which is paired with conspiratorial rhetoric alongside traditionalist and reactionary aspirations. The term was first used by social scientists in the 1950s regarding small groups such as the John Birch Society in the United States, and since then it has been applied to similar groups worldwide. The term "radical" was applied to the groups because they sought to make fundamental changes within institutions and remove persons and institutions that threatened their values or economic interests from political life.

Centrism is a political outlook or position involving acceptance or support of a balance of social equality and a degree of social hierarchy while opposing political changes that would result in a significant shift of society strongly to the left or the right.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New York Young Republican Club</span> American political youth organization

The New York Young Republican Club (NYYRC) is an organization for members of the Republican Party between the ages of 18 and 40 in Manhattan. The New York Young Republican Club is the oldest and largest chapter in the United States, founded in 1911 with predecessor organizations going back to 1856. The club is affiliated with and officially recognized by the New York State Young Republicans and the Young Republican National Federation, as well as the borough, state, and national Republican committees.

References

Informational notes

  1. An early reference to "wingnut welfare" can be found on "Political Animal", an unsigned feature published by CBS News on August 21, 2008. See "Wingnut Welfare"

Citations

  1. "wing nut" Merriam-Webster Dictionary
  2. "Wing nut" Lexico
  3. McFadden, Robert D. (September 27, 2009). "William Safire, Nixon Speechwriter and Times Columnist, Is Dead at 79". The New York Times . Retrieved September 27, 2009.
  4. Safire, William (April 11, 2004) "Wing Nut" The New York Times Magazine
  5. Safire, William (February 19, 2006) "Blargon" The New York Times Magazine
  6. Safire, William (September 3, 2006) "Moon Bats & Wing Nuts" The New York Times Magazine
  7. Safire, William (2008) Safire's Political Dictionary New York: Oxford University Press. p.435. ISBN   9780195340617
  8. Herszenhorn, David M. (October 31, 2009) "Alan Grayson, the Liberals’ Problem Child" The New York Times
  9. R.M. (May 16, 2010) "Six questions for John Avlon" The Economist
  10. Avlon, John (2014) Wingnuts: Extremism in the Age of Obama New York: Beast Books. pp.3-6; passim. ISBN   978-0-99124-760-8
  11. Krugman, Paul (April 25, 2015) "Wingnut Welfare and Work Incentives" The New York Times
  12. Krugman, Paul (May 24, 2021) "The Banality of Democratic Collapse" The New York Times
  13. Longman, Martin (December 22, 2017) "The Left Has No Answer to Wingnut Welfare" Washington Monthly
  14. Waldman, Paul (November 21, 2018) "How Matthew Whitaker’s ‘wingnut welfare’ stint made him perfect for Trump" The Washington Post
  15. Pierce, Charles P. (September 20, 2021) "This Supreme Court Brief Gives Away the Whole Conservative Game on Abortion" Esquire
  16. Pierce, Charles P. (June 13, 2018) "Scott Pruitt Is a Monument to Wingnut Welfare" Esquire via Yahoo! Life
  17. Pierce, Charles P. (October 13, 2020) "Sheldon Whitehouse Made the Case That Amy Coney Barrett's Nomination Is a Bag Job" Esquire via the website of Sheldon Whitehouse, U.S. Senator for Rhode Island
  18. Chait, Jonathan (September 10, 2007) "Feast of the Wingnuts" The New Republic
  19. Stuart, Tessa (July 21, 2016) "How 'Lock Her Up!' Became a Mainstream GOP Rallying Cry" Rolling Stone
  20. Boot, Max (April 12, 2020) "Republicans are becoming the QAnon Party" The Washington Post