2022 Alabama Recompiled Constitution Ratification Question

Last updated
Recompiled Constitution Ratification Question
Flag of Alabama.svg
November 8, 2022

Ratify the Recompiled State Constitution
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes888,45676.49%
Light brown x.svgNo273,04023.51%
Total votes1,161,496100.00%

2022 Alabama Constitution Ratification results map by county.svg
AL Question 2022.svg

Alabama Recompiled Constitution Ratification Question [1] was held to amend the Constitution of Alabama, replacing it with a more modern version drafted to achieve the following:

Contents

The new Constitution became the seventh in Alabama's history, succeeding the documents adopted in 1819, 1861, 1865, 1868, 1875 and 1901. [6] [7]

Background

Alabama's previous Constitution was established with the explicit purpose of establishing white supremacy in the state. [8] There had been three citizen efforts to strike down the racist and outdated language from the Constitution:

Amendment 4

Amendment 4
Flag of Alabama.svg
November 3, 2020

Authorize Legislature to Recompile the State Constitution Measure
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes1,222,68266.82%
Light brown x.svgNo607,09033.18%

2020 Alabama Amendment 4 results map by county.svg

The referendum was preceded by a 2020 amendment that authorized the Alabama Legislature to draft a new version of the Constitution. Four sections were struck down from the document, including one that established school discrimination. [12]

The measure passed with a wide majority of more than two thirds of the votes. It got its strongest results in Macon and Greene counties, while performing the worst in Covington county.

Results by county

County
YesNo
VotesPer.VotesPer.
  Autauga 13,71563.28%7,95836.72%
  Baldwin 59,39467.75%28,27632.25%
  Barbour 4,97566.76%2,47733.24%
  Bibb 4,15954.95%3,41045.05%
  Blount 11,08951.76%10,33648.24%
  Bullock 2,25674.46%77425.54%
  Butler 4,14960.67%2,69039.33%
  Calhoun 26,41267.58%12,67332.42%
  Chambers 8,32470.49%3,48429.51%
  Cherokee 5,78162.52%3,46537.48%
  Chilton 7,89051.8%7,34148.2%
  Choctaw 2,84154.35%2,38645.65%
  Clarke 6,24665.36%3,31134.64%
  Clay 2,67251.62%2,50448.38%
  Cleburne 2,82756.07%2,21543.93%
  Coffee 11,21063.08%6,56236.92%
  Colbert 13,47462.4%8,12037.6%
  Conecuh 2,70563.95%1,52536.05%
  Coosa 2,39057.9%1,73842.1%
  Covington 6,08146.26%7,06353.74%
  Crenshaw 2,59354.53%2,16245.47%
  Cullman 17,36152.58%15,65547.42%
  Dale 10,00164.2%5,57835.8%
  Dallas 9,56672.48%3,63327.52%
  DeKalb 12,56457.81%9,16842.19%
  Elmore 19,51760.35%12,82439.65%
  Escambia 7,15565.32%3,79834.68%
  Etowah 22,49358.8%15,75941.2%
  Fayette 3,25351.11%3,11248.89%
  Franklin 5,41757.74%3,96442.26%
  Geneva 5,35054.47%4,47245.53%
  Greene 2,57975.81%82324.19%
  Hale 3,69464.24%2,05635.76%
  Henry 4,30263.55%2,46836.45%
  Houston 23,77766.07%12,21133.93%
  Jackson 10,48861.39%6,59638.61%
  Jefferson 196,44672.0%76,37828.0%
  Lamar 2,67650.46%2,62749.54%
  Lauderdale 21,26763.0%12,48937.0%
  Lawrence 7,02057.55%5,17942.45%
  Lee 43,31973.52%15,60226.48%
  Limestone 26,83668.84%12,14631.16%
  Lowndes 3,43173.5%1,23726.5%
  Macon 5,21076.87%1,56823.13%
  Madison 120,39075.73%38,58224.27%
  Marengo 4,77659.98%3,18740.02%
  Marion 5,45451.85%5,06548.15%
  Marshall 18,92461.68%11,75738.32%
  Mobile 97,86770.26%41,41929.74%
  Monroe 5,42865.12%2,90834.88%
  Montgomery 55,20571.77%21,71128.23%
  Morgan 26,68363.77%15,16236.23%
  Perry 2,40065.79%1,24834.21%
  Pickens 4,90366.06%2,51933.94%
  Pike 7,01167.0%3,45333.0%
  Randolph 4,91062.43%2,95537.57%
  Russell 11,92873.81%4,23226.19%
  Shelby 20,39957.12%15,31642.88%
  St. Clair 64,94468.63%29,68531.37%
  Sumter 2,49462.55%1,49337.45%
  Talladega 18,31465.65%9,58134.35%
  Tallapoosa 10,07164.32%5,58735.68%
  Tuscaloosa 50,34768.83%22,80131.17%
  Walker 13,60255.57%10,87744.43%
  Washington 4,06664.42%2,24635.58%
  Wilcox 3,36373.14%1,23526.86%
  Winston 4,29850.23%4,25849.77%

Results

The measure was broadly accepted, winning more than three fourths of the votes. It succeeded in every county of the state, performing the best in Macon and Madison counties. Conversely, it got its worst result in Choctaw county.

Ratify the Recompiled State Constitution
ChoiceVotes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes888,45676.49
No273,04023.51
Total votes1,161,496100.00

Results by county

County
YesNo
VotesPer.VotesPer.
  Autauga 10,46870.62%4,35629.38%
  Baldwin 45,26471.61%17,94328.39%
  Barbour 3,71075.1%1,23024.9%
  Bibb 3,09064.63%1,69135.37%
  Blount 8,80865.68%4,60334.32%
  Bullock 1,48679.13%39220.87%
  Butler 3,23370.74%1,33729.26%
  Calhoun 18,06075.24%5,94224.76%
  Chambers 5,57275.48%1,81024.52%
  Cherokee 4,21970.47%1,76829.53%
  Chilton 6,52264.43%3,60035.57%
  Choctaw 2,28558.95%1,59141.05%
  Clarke 4,80772.62%1,81227.38%
  Clay 2,06162.72%1,22537.28%
  Cleburne 2,21964.66%1,21335.34%
  Coffee 8,65775.85%2,75724.15%
  Colbert 10,23473.37%3,71526.63%
  Conecuh 2,36474.08%82725.92%
  Coosa 2,15269.92%92630.08%
  Covington 5,79869.08%2,59530.92%
  Crenshaw 2,32166.14%1,18833.86%
  Cullman 13,82466.24%7,04733.76%
  Dale 7,46375.43%2,43124.57%
  Dallas 6,80879.49%1,75720.51%
  DeKalb 8,91769.64%3,88830.36%
  Elmore 15,36871.24%6,20528.76%
  Escambia 5,26972.42%2,00727.58%
  Etowah 15,30073.43%5,53726.57%
  Fayette 2,82166.9%1,39633.1%
  Franklin 3,61165.12%1,93434.88%
  Geneva 4,24165.42%2,24234.58%
  Greene 1,46579.4%38020.6%
  Hale 2,79678.06%78621.94%
  Henry 3,91172.61%1,47527.39%
  Houston 17,03174.31%5,88825.69%
  Jackson 6,67869.18%2,97530.82%
  Jefferson 139,18481.45%31,68918.55%
  Lamar 2,22170.4%93429.6%
  Lauderdale 15,11974.48%5,18025.52%
  Lawrence 5,73366.53%2,88433.47%
  Lee 28,25982.43%6,02517.57%
  Limestone 20,18977.13%5,98522.87%
  Lowndes 2,24279.31%58520.69%
  Macon 3,74184.56%68315.44%
  Madison 88,35184.52%16,18615.48%
  Marengo 3,71071.25%1,49728.75%
  Marion 4,18666.28%2,13033.72%
  Marshall 14,27273.51%5,14226.49%
  Mobile 68,83478.06%19,34221.94%
  Monroe 4,00675.63%1,29124.37%
  Montgomery 40,39783.99%7,70316.01%
  Morgan 20,04577.45%5,83522.55%
  Perry 1,78781.45%40718.55%
  Pickens 3,87573.31%1,41126.69%
  Pike 4,79075.94%1,51824.06%
  Randolph 3,38767.6%1,62332.4%
  Russell 7,59480.86%1,79819.14%
  Shelby 48,63180.8%11,55619.2%
  St. Clair 16,29670.44%6,84029.56%
  Sumter 2,04380.21%50419.79%
  Talladega 13,17975.59%4,25524.41%
  Tallapoosa 7,69473.33%2,79826.67%
  Tuscaloosa 32,27577.6%9,31722.4%
  Walker 9,45764.87%5,12135.13%
  Washington 2,86860.79%1,85039.21%
  Wilcox 1,87374.12%65425.88%
  Winston 3,38564.93%1,82835.07%

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1964 amendment prohibiting poll taxes

The Twenty-fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits both Congress and the states from conditioning the right to vote in federal elections on payment of a poll tax or other types of tax. The amendment was proposed by Congress to the states on August 27, 1962, and was ratified by the states on January 23, 1964.

Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Beginning in 2013, the decision was cited as precedent in U.S. federal court decisions ruling that restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States were unconstitutional, including in the Supreme Court decision Obergefell v. Hodges (2015).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alabama Constitution of 1901</span> Principles, institutions and law of political governance in the U.S. state of Alabama

The Constitution of the State of Alabama of 1901 was the basic governing document of the U.S. state of Alabama. Adopted in 1901 and renamed in 2022, it is Alabama's sixth constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Tennessee</span> Basic governing document of the U.S. state of Tennessee

The Constitution of the State of Tennessee defines the form, structure, activities, character, and fundamental rules of the U.S. State of Tennessee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions</span>

Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions of several different types passed, banning legal recognition of same-sex unions in U.S. state constitutions, referred to by proponents as "defense of marriage amendments" or "marriage protection amendments." These state amendments are different from the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment, which would ban same-sex marriage in every U.S. state, and Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act, more commonly known as DOMA, which allowed the states not to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. The amendments define marriage as a union between one man and one woman and prevent civil unions or same-sex marriages from being legalized, though some of the amendments bar only the latter. The Obergefell decision in June 2015 invalidated these state constitutional amendments insofar as they prevented same-sex couples from marrying, even though the actual text of these amendments remain written into the state constitutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Texas</span> Principles, institutions and law of political governance in the U.S. state of Texas

The Constitution of the State of Texas is the document that establishes the structure and function of the government of the U.S. state of Texas, and enumerates the basic rights of the citizens of Texas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Virginia</span> Principles, institutions, and law of political governance in the U.S. state of Virginia

The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia is the document that defines and limits the powers of the state government and the basic rights of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Like all other state constitutions, it is supreme over Virginia's laws and acts of government, though it may be superseded by the United States Constitution and U.S. federal law as per the Supremacy Clause.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Florida</span> Principles, institutions and law of political governance in the U.S. state of Florida

The Constitution of the State of Florida is the document that establishes and describes the powers, duties, structure, and function of the government of the U.S. state of Florida, and establishes the basic law of the state. The current Constitution of Florida was ratified on November 5, 1968.

The Constitution of the State of South Carolina is the governing document of the U.S. state of South Carolina. It describes the structure and function of the state's government. The current constitution took effect on December 4, 1895. South Carolina has had six other constitutions, which were adopted in 1669, 1776, 1778, 1790, 1865 and 1868.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Mississippi</span> Supreme law of Mississippi, US

The Constitution of Mississippi is the primary organizing law for the U.S. state of Mississippi delineating the duties, powers, structures, and functions of the state government. Mississippi's original constitution was adopted at a constitutional convention held at Washington, Mississippi in advance of the western portion of the territory's admission to the Union in 1817. The current state constitution was adopted in 1890 following the reconstruction period. It has been amended and updated 100 times in since its adoption in 1890, with some sections being changed or repealed altogether. The most recent modification to the constitution occurred in November 2020, when Section 140 was amended, and Sections 141-143 were repealed.

The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Kentucky is the document that governs the Commonwealth of Kentucky. It was first adopted in 1792 and has since been rewritten three times and amended many more. The later versions were adopted in 1799, 1850, and 1891.

The Tennessee Plan is a system used to appoint and elect appellate court judges in Tennessee. It is largely patterned after the Missouri Plan, and an earlier version in Tennessee was called the Modified Missouri Plan. At the end of every judge's eight-year term following a judicial appointment to the highest courts, retention elections are held, which have the option of whether each judge shall be retained through a yes-no option. This system applies to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Tennessee Court of Appeals, and the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reconstruction Amendments</span> Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth amendments to the United States Constitution

The Reconstruction Amendments, or the Civil War Amendments, are the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth amendments to the United States Constitution, adopted between 1865 and 1870. The amendments were a part of the implementation of the Reconstruction of the American South which occurred after the Civil War.

The Tennessee Marriage Protection Amendment, also known as Tennessee Amendment 1 of 2006, is a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex unions. The referendum was approved by 81% of voters. It specified that only a marriage between a man and a woman could be legally recognized in the state of Tennessee. This prohibited same-sex marriages within the state, reinforcing previously existing statutes to the same effect until it was overturned by the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling in June 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Alabama Amendment 774</span>

The Amendment 774 of 2006, also known as Alabama Sanctity of Marriage Amendment, is an amendment to the Alabama Constitution that makes it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. The legislature passed Alabama Act 2005-35, which placed this amendment on the election ballot. The referendum was approved by 81% of the voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era</span> Post-civil war voter suppression efforts in the United States

Disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era in the United States, especially in the Southern United States, was based on a series of laws, new constitutions, and practices in the South that were deliberately used to prevent black citizens from registering to vote and voting. These measures were enacted by the former Confederate states at the turn of the 20th century. Efforts were also made in Maryland, Kentucky, and Oklahoma. Their actions were designed to thwart the objective of the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1870, which prohibited states from depriving voters of their voting rights on the basis of race. The laws were frequently written in ways to be ostensibly non-racial on paper, but were implemented in ways that selectively suppressed black voters apart from other voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States</span> Laws against interracial marriage

In the United States, many U.S. states historically had anti-miscegenation laws which prohibited interracial marriage and, in some states, interracial sexual relations. Some of these laws predated the establishment of the United States, and some dated to the later 17th or early 18th century, a century or more after the complete racialization of slavery. Nine states never enacted anti-miscegenation laws, and 25 states had repealed their laws by 1967. In that year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Loving v. Virginia that such laws are unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Repeal of exceptions to slavery and involuntary servitude</span>

In the United States, the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime of which one has been convicted. In the latter 2010s, a movement has emerged to repeal the exception clause from both the federal and state constitutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2000 Alabama Amendment 2</span> Allowed interracial marriage

2000 Alabama Amendment 2, also known as the Alabama Interracial Marriage Amendment, was a proposed amendment to the Constitution of Alabama to remove Alabama's ban on interracial marriage. Interracial marriage had already been legalized nationwide 33 years prior in 1967, following Loving v. Virginia, making the vote symbolic. The amendment was approved with 59.5% voting yes, a 19 percentage point margin, though 25 of Alabama's 67 counties voted against it. Alabama was the last state to officially repeal its anti-miscegenation laws, following South Carolina in 1998.

The Constitution of the State of Alabama is the basic governing document of the U.S. state of Alabama. It was adopted in 2022 and is Alabama's seventh state constitution.

References

  1. "Alabama Recompiled Constitution Ratification Question". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
  2. Glenn, John (9 November 2022). "Elections Alabama voters approve new constitution, 10 amendments on ballot". Alabama Political Reporter. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  3. Spencer, Thomas (26 October 2022). "A New Constitution Plus Additional Amendments on the Nov. 8 Ballot". Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  4. Andrew, Scottie (27 October 2020). "Alabama voters will decide whether to remove racist language about segregated schools and interracial marriage from the state constitution" . Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  5. Weiss, Debra (20 September 2021). "Alabama committee grapples with racism enshrined in state constitution as rewrite process begins" . Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  6. "Alabama's Six Constitutions". Alabama Legislature. 19 September 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2023.
  7. Thompson, Megan (19 March 2022). "Racist language may soon be gone from Alabama's constitution" . Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  8. Mzezewa, Tairo. "Alabama Begins Removing Racist Language From Its Constitution". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  9. "Alabama faces recount over segregationist laws". CNN. 5 November 2004. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  10. Roig-Franzia, Manuel (28 November 2004). "Alabama vote opens old racial wounds". NBC News. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  11. "Alabama Segregation Reference Ban Amendment, Amendment 4 (2012)" . Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  12. "Alabama Constitution of 2022 appears to be on its way to voters in November". AL.com. Retrieved 18 November 2023.