Proto-Min

Last updated
Proto-Min
Reconstruction of Min Chinese
RegionFujian
Erac. 4th century AD
Reconstructed
ancestors
Chinese name
Traditional Chinese 原始閩語
Simplified Chinese 原始闽语

Proto-Min is a comparative reconstruction of the common ancestor of the Min group of varieties of Chinese. Min varieties developed in the relative isolation of the Chinese province of Fujian and eastern Guangdong, and have since spread to Taiwan, Southeast Asia, and other parts of the world. They contain reflexes of distinctions not found in Middle Chinese or most other modern varieties, and thus provide additional data for the reconstruction of Old Chinese.

Contents

Jerry Norman reconstructed the sound system of Proto-Min from popular vocabulary in a range of Min varieties, including new data on varieties from inland Fujian. The system has a six-way manner contrast in stops and affricates, compared with the three-way contrast in Middle Chinese and modern Wu varieties and the two-way contrast in most modern Chinese varieties. A two-way contrast in sonorants is also reconstructed, compared with the single series of Middle Chinese and all modern varieties. Evidence from early loans into other languages suggests that the additional contrasts may reflect consonant clusters or minor syllables.

Min dialects

China edcp relief location map.jpg
Fujian
China edcp relief location map.jpg
Location of Fujian in eastern China

The Min homeland consists of most of the province of Fujian, and the adjacent eastern part of Guangdong. The area features rugged mountainous terrain, with short rivers that flow into the South China Sea. After the area was first settled by Chinese during the Han dynasty, most subsequent migration from north to south China passed through the valleys of the Xiang and Gan rivers to the west. Min varieties have thus developed in relative isolation. [1]

Separation from common Chinese

As described in rhyme dictionaries such as the Qieyun (601 AD), Middle Chinese initial stops and affricate consonants showed a three-way contrast between voiceless unaspirated, voiceless aspirated and voiced consonants. There were four tones, with the fourth, the "entering tone", a checked tone comprising syllables ending in stops (-p, -t or -k).

This syllable structure was also found in neighbouring languages of the Mainland Southeast Asia linguistic area – Proto-Hmong–Mien, Proto-Tai and early Vietnamese – and is largely preserved by early loans between the languages. [2] Towards the end of the first millennium AD, all of these languages experienced a tone split conditioned by initial consonants. Each tone split into an upper (yīn阴/陰) register consisting of words with voiceless initials and a lower (yáng阳/陽) register of words with voiced initials. When voicing was lost in most varieties, the register distinction became phonemic, yielding up to eight tonal categories, with a six-way contrast in unchecked syllables and a two-way contrast in checked syllables. [3]

The traditional classification of varieties of Chinese distinguished seven groups according to the reflexes of Middle Chinese voiced initials in various tonal categories. [4] For example, voiced stops are preserved in the Wu and Old Xiang groups, have merged with aspirated or unaspirated stops depending on the tone in Mandarin, and have uniformly become aspirated stops in Gan and Hakka. [5] The distinguishing characteristic of Min varieties is that voiced stops yield both aspirated and unaspirated stops in all tonal categories. Further, the distribution is consistent across Min varieties, suggesting a common ancestor in which two types of voiced stop were distinguished. [6]

Simplified model of the evolution of varieties of Chinese Chinese tree.svg
Simplified model of the evolution of varieties of Chinese

Min must have diverged before two changes in other Chinese varieties (including Middle Chinese) that are not reflected in Min:

However, the palatalization of dental stop initials, which had occurred in some dialects by the Eastern Han period, is common to Middle Chinese and Min. [10] Baxter and Sagart suggest that the later part of the Proto-Min period may have overlapped with Early Middle Chinese. [11]

Pointing to features of Min varieties that are also found in Hakka and Yue varieties, Jerry Norman suggests that the three groups are descended from a variety spoken in the lower Yangtze region during the Han period, which he calls Old Southern Chinese. [12] He argues that this dialect belonged to the group of dialects known as Wu (吳) or Jiangdong (江東) in the Western Jin period, when the writer Guo Pu (early 4th century AD) described them as quite distinct from other Chinese varieties. [13] Some of the distinctive Jiangdong words mentioned by Guo Pu appear to be preserved in modern Min varieties, including Proto-Min *giA 'leech' and *lhɑnC 'young fowl'. [14] This language entered Fujian after the area was opened to Chinese settlement by the defeat of the Minyue state by the armies of Emperor Wu of Han in 110 BC. [15] Norman argues that Hakka and Yue have resulted from overlays of this language by successive waves of influence from northern China. [16]

When Chinese soldiers and settlers moved south from their homeland in the North China Plain, they came into contact with speakers of Tai–Kadai, Hmong–Mien and Austroasiatic languages. Early loans from Chinese into these languages date from around Han times and thus contain evidence of the sounds of Chinese as spoken in the south at that time. [17]

Strata

Norman identifies four main layers in the vocabulary of modern Min varieties:

  1. A non-Chinese substratum from the original languages of Minyue, which Norman believes were Austroasiatic. [18] These etymologies have been disputed by Laurent Sagart, and there is no other evidence for an early Austroasiatic presence in southeast China. [19]
  2. The earliest Chinese layer, brought to Fujian by settlers from Zhejiang to the north during the Han dynasty [13] (compare Eastern Han Chinese).
  3. A layer from the Northern and Southern dynasties period, largely consistent with the phonology of the Qieyun dictionary, which was published in 601 AD but based on earlier dictionaries that are now lost [20] (Early Middle Chinese).
  4. A literary layer based on the koiné of Chang'an, the capital of the Tang dynasty [21] (Late Middle Chinese).

Since the latter two layers can largely be derived from the Qieyun, Norman sought to focus on the earlier layers. [20]

Subgroups

Early classifications, such as those of Li Fang-Kuei in 1937 and Yuan Jiahua in 1960, divided Min into Northern and Southern subgroups. [22] [23] However, in a 1963 report on a survey of Fujian, Pan Maoding and colleagues argued that the primary split was between inland and coastal groups. [24] The inland varieties are distinguished by consistently having two distinct reflexes of Middle Chinese /l/. [23] The two groups also have differences in their vocabulary, including their pronoun systems. [25]

The coastal dialects are divided into three subgroups: [26]

Eastern Min
including Fuzhou, Ningde and Fu'an in northeast Fujian
Pu-Xian Min
including Putian and Xianyou on the central Fujian coast
Southern Min
including Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou in southern Fujian, and Chaozhou, Jieyang and Shantou in eastern Guangdong

They divided the inland dialects into two subgroups:

Northern Min
including Jianyang, Jian'ou, Chong'an, Zhenghe and Shibei
Central Min
including Sanming and Yong'an in western Fujian

Several varieties in the far west of Fujian include features of Min and the neighbouring Gan and Hakka groups, making them difficult to classify. In the Shaojiang dialects, spoken in the northwestern Fujian counties of Shaowu and Jiangle, the reflexes of Middle Chinese voiced stops are uniformly aspirated, as in Gan and Hakka, leading some workers to assign them to one of these groups. Pan et al. described them as intermediate between Min and Hakka. [27] However, Norman showed that their tonal development could only be explained in terms of the same two classes of voiced initial assumed for Min dialects. He suggested that they were inland Min dialects that had been subject to heavy Gan or Hakka influence. [28] Norman's student David Prager Branner argued that the varieties of Longyan and the township of Wan'an, in the southwestern part of the province, were coastal Min varieties, but outside of the three subgroups identified by Pan. [29] [30]

Initials

In a series of papers from 1973, Jerry Norman sought to reconstruct the initial consonants of Proto-Min by applying the comparative method to pronunciations in modern Min varieties. For this purpose, rather than the traditional approach of soliciting readings of character lists, he focussed on everyday vocabulary and excluded words of literary origin. [31]

Initials of Proto-Min [32] [33]
LabialDentalLateralSibilant Palatal VelarGlottal
Voiceless stops
and affricates		aspiratedphthtshtšhkh
unaspiratedpttstškʔ
"softened"-p-t-ts-tš-k
Voiced stops
and affricates		aspiratedbhdhdzhdžhgh
unaspiratedbddzdžg
"softened"-b-d-dz-dž-g
Sonorantsplainmnlńŋ∅
aspiratedmhnhlh(ńh)ŋh
Fricativesvoicelesssšx
voicedzžɣɦ

The inventory of Proto-Min initials differs from that of Middle Chinese (as deduced from the Qieyun rhyme book and its successors) in several ways:

The most controversial have been the "softened" stops and affricates, so named because they have lateral or fricative reflexes in some Northern Min varieties centred on Jianyang. These initials also have distinct tonal reflexes in the Northern Min and Shaojiang groups, but have merged with unaspirated stops and affricates in coastal varieties. Other scholars have suggested that the patterns observed in northwest Fujian can be explained as a mixture of forms from neighbouring Wu, Gan and Hakka varieties, though this does not explain the regularity of the correspondences. [38] In addition, the forms of many of the words in the proposed donor varieties do not match the Min reflexes, and some of the words occur only in Min. [39]

Since the pioneering reconstruction of Bernhard Karlgren, Old Chinese has been reconstructed by projecting the categories of Middle Chinese back onto the rhyming patterns of the Classic of Poetry and the shared phonetic components of Chinese characters. Thus Old Chinese is usually reconstructed with the same three-way manner distinction in obstruent initials found in Middle Chinese. However this does not preclude additional manner distinctions that merged in Middle Chinese, because rhyme gives no information about initials and sharing of phonetic components indicates initials with the same place of articulation but not necessarily the same manner. [40] Several scholars have attempted to incorporate Proto-Min data into their reconstructions of Old Chinese. The most systematic attempt to date is the reconstruction of Baxter and Sagart, who derive the additional initials from a number of initial consonant clusters and minor syllables. [41]

Voiceless stops and affricates

All modern Min varieties have a two-way contrast between unaspirated and aspirated voiceless stops and affricates. [lower-alpha 1] Where these initials occur with upper register tones, they are projected back into Proto-Min, and correspond to unaspirated and aspirated voiceless initials in Middle Chinese. However, some Middle Chinese voiceless unaspirated initials correspond to fricatives or laterals in Northern Min, and also have a special tonal development in Northern Min and Shao–Jiang. Norman called these initials voiceless "softened" stops and affricates. [43]

Voiceless stop and affricate initials [44] [45] [46]
pMinXiamenFuzhouJian'ouJianyangShaowuExamples
*phpʰpʰpʰpʰpʰ 拍 hit, 破 break, broken, 簿 register (n.), 蜂 bee
*pppppp 八 eight, 分 share, 半 half, 板 board
*-pppp/∅v/∅pʰ 反 reverse (v.), 崩 collapse, fall over, 楓 maple, 沸 boil (v.), 發 emit, 補 repair, 飛 fly (v.)
*thtʰtʰtʰhtʰ 天 sky, 炭 charcoal, 腿 leg, 鐵 iron
*tttttt 單 list, 帶 belt, 桌 table, 短 short
*-ttttltʰ 擔 carry on the shoulder, 賭 wager, 轉 turn
*tshtsʰtsʰtsʰtsʰ/tʰtsʰ 秋 autumn, 草 grass, 菜 vegetable, 青 green
*tstststststs 做 make, 姊 elder sister, 竈 stove, 節 holiday, 酒 liquor
*-tstststsltsʰ 䭕 insipid, 早 early, 淡 unsalty, 簪 hairpin, 醉 drunk
*tšhtsʰtsʰtsʰtsʰ/tʰtʃʰ 唱 to lead (in singing), 戍 house, 深 deep, 臭 smelly, 醒 awake
*tštststststʃ 正 correct, 汁 juice, 紙 paper, 針 needle
*-tštststs∅tʃ 指 finger
*khkʰkʰkʰkʰkʰ 勸 advise, 客 guest, 苦 bitter, 開 open, 骹 foot
*kkkkkk 嫁 marry, 救 save, 教 teach, 枝 branch, 桔 tangerine, 瓜 melon, 繭 cocoon, 肝 liver, 角 horn, 記 remember, 雞 chicken, 韮 type of leek
*-kkk∅∅/hk 割 cut (v.), 狗 dog, 缸 jar, 膏 lard, 飢 hungry

In loans from southern Chinese into proto-Hmong–Mien, softened obstruents are often represented by prenasalized consonants. [47] Norman suggests the Proto-Min initials were also prenasalized, [48] whereas Baxter and Sagart derive them from stops preceded by minor syllables, arguing that the intervocalic environment caused the stops to weaken to fricatives in some dialects. [49]

Voiced stops and affricates

In most varieties of Chinese that have lost the voicing of Middle Chinese initials, the aspiration of the resulting initials is conditioned by tone, though the relationship varies between dialect groups. In Min varieties however, both aspirated and unaspirated voiceless initials are found in lower register tones. These initials must therefore be distinguished in Proto-Min as aspirated and unaspirated voiced consonants. In Shao–Jiang these initials are uniformly aspirated, but the same distinction is reflected in the tonal development. As with the voiceless initials, there is a third group of formerly voiced initials with fricative or lateral reflexes in some Northern Min varieties, which Norman called "softened" voiced initials. [50] In Eastern Min varieties, voiced unaspirated affricates typically yielded plain /s/. [51]

Voiced stop and affricate initials [52] [53] [54] [55]
pMinXiamenFuzhouJian'ouJianyangShaowuExamples
*bhpʰpʰpʰpʰpʰ 伴 escort, 曝 shine, 皮 skin, 稗 tare, 薸 duckweed, 被 cover, 雹 hail, 鼻 nose
*bpppppʰ 平 level, 爬 climb, 病 ill, 白 white, 盤 dish, 耙 harrow, 肥 fat (adj.), 飯 rice
*-bpppvpʰ 吠 bark (v.), 婦 daughter-in-law, 拔 pull, 步 stride, 浮 float (v.), 瓶 vase, 盆 bowl, 簰 raft, 薄 thin
*dhtʰtʰtʰhtʰ 啼 weep, 杖 staff, 柱 pillar, 桃 peach, 椎 hammer, 疊 stack up, 蟲 bug, 頭 head, 餳 sugar
*dtttttʰ 住 reside, 弟 younger brother, 斷 break off, 直 straight, 筒 tube, 茶 tea, 豆 bean, 踏 step on, 蹄 hoof, 重 heavy
*-dtttltʰ 値 worth, 動 move, 毒 poison, 脰 neck, 舵 rudder, 袋 bag, 銅 copper, 長 long
*dzhtsʰtsʰtsʰtsʰ/tʰtsʰ 柴 wood, 牀 bed, 田 field, 賊 thief
*dztss/tstststsʰ 坐 sit, 截 to cut off, 晴 clear (weather), 槽 trough, 自 self (adv.), 錢 money
*-dztss/tstsltsʰ 字 character, 罪 crime, 謝 decline, 齊 together
*džhtsʰtsʰss/tsʰʃ 席 mat, 樹 tree, 象 resemble, 鱔 eel
*džtsststsʃ 上 top, 石 stone, 薯 yam, 裳 clothing
*-džtss∅∅ʃ 上 ascend, 嘗 taste (v.), 舌 tongue, 船 boat, 蛇 snake
*ghkʰkʰkʰkʰkʰ 柿 persimmon, 臼 mortar, 踦 stand, 騎 ride
*gkkkkkʰ 妗 aunt, 橋 bridge, 汗 sweat (n.), 舊 old, 茄 eggplant, 跪 kneel
*-gkkkk/∅kʰ/h 厚 thick, 含 hold in the mouth, 咬 bite, 滑 slippery, 猴 monkey, 球 ball, 縣 district

There are several cases where an adjective or intransitive verb beginning with an unaspirated voiced stop is paired with a transitive verb differing only in aspiration of the voiced stop, suggesting that the contrast reflects an early morphological process. [56]

Early loans from southern Chinese into Proto-Hmong–Mien have prenasalized stops corresponding to both aspirated and softened voiced stops in Proto-Min. [57] Baxter and Sagart derive aspirated voiced stops from tightly bound nasal preinitials in Old Chinese, and softened voiced stops from voiced stops preceded by minor syllables. [57]

Sonorants

Inland Min varieties are characterized by having two distinct reflexes of Middle Chinese /n/, which Norman labels as Proto-Min *l and *lh. The two have merged in coastal varieties. In modern Southern Min varieties such as Hokkien, /l/ and /n/ comprise a single phoneme, realized as /n/ before nasalized vowels and as /l/ in other syllables. [37] Two series of nasals can also be distinguished based on their tonal reflexes in Eastern Min and Shao-Jiang. They generally produce a single series of nasal initials in modern varieties except in Southern Min. In those varieties, the Proto-Min initials *nh and *ŋh have become /h/ before high front vowels, *m, *n and *ŋ denasalized to *b, *l and *g respectively before oral vowels, but *mh and other occurrences of *nh and *ŋh often yield nasals in that context. [58] [42]

Sonorant initials [59] [60]
pMinXiamenFuzhouJian'ouJianyangShaowuExamples
*llllll 來 come, 流 flow (v.), 犁 plow, 籠 cage, 綠 green, 落 fall (v.), 蠟 wax, 辣 pungent
*lhl/nlsss 兩 two, 六 six, 利 sharp, 劉 a surname, 卵 egg, 李 plum, 留 remain, 笠 rain-hat, 籃 basket, 籮 hamper, 老 old, 聾 deaf, 蘆 reed, 螺 snail, 貍 wildcat, 郎 young man, 雷 thunder, 露 dew, 鱗 scale (or fish or reptile)
*mm/bmmmm 命 life, 慢 slow, 梅 plum, 煤 coal, 盲 blind, 磨 grind, whet, 蜜 honey, 賣 sell, 門 gate, door, 麥 wheat
*mhm/bmmmm 名 name, 問 ask, 夢 dream, 妹 sister, 目 eye, 罵 scold, 蚊 mosquito, 貓 cat, 面 face, 麻 hemp
*nn/lnnnn 南 south, 念 read
*nhn/h/lnnnn 年 year, 肉 meat, 膿 pus, 讓 allow (want)
*ńl/dznnnn 二 two, 日 day, 認 recognize, 閏 intercalary
*ŋŋ/g/hŋŋŋŋ/n 五 five, 外 outside, 月 moon, 玉 jade, 銀 silver, 魚 fish, 鵝 goose
*ŋhhŋŋŋŋ/n 硯 ink-stone, 艾 moxa, 額 forehead

As the initials *lh, *nh, etc. follow the same tonal development as voiced aspirated initials throughout Min, Norman suggests that they were characterized by breathy voice. [61] In Hakka dialects, nasals appear in both lower and upper register tones, suggesting a protolanguage with both voiced and voiceless nasals. Moreover, the occurrence of these initials corresponds to the plain and aspirated nasals of Proto-Min. [62] Norman suggests that they derive from voiced and voiceless nasals in Old Southern Chinese. Further evidence for a voicing distinction comes from early loans into Vietnamese and the Mienic and Tai languages. [63] Norman later abandoned the *ń initial, treating the dz-/z- initials in some Southern Min varieties as arising from *n followed by a high front vowel *i or *y. [64] [65]

Norman suggests that Old Southern Chinese voiceless sonorants derive from sonorants preceded by voiceless consonants. [66] William Baxter and Laurent Sagart have incorporated this proposal into their reconstruction of Old Chinese. [67]

A different set of voiceless resonant initials is proposed in most recent reconstructions of Old Chinese, with aspirate or fricative reflexes in Middle Chinese. [68] For example, Old Chinese *n̥ and *l̥ yielded *th in both Middle Chinese and Proto-Min in non-palatal environments. However, in palatal environments they yielded sy in Middle Chinese but in Proto-Min gave *tšh, the regular reflex of Old Chinese *tʰ in palatal environments. [69]

Fricatives and others

Fricatives in upper and lower registers are assumed to derive from voiceless and voiced fricatives respectively, broadly corresponding to the voiceless and voiced fricatives of Middle Chinese. [36] Zero initials show three distinct patterns of tonal development, reconstructed as initials *ɦ, *ʔ and a Proto-Min zero initial. The latter occurs only before the high front vowels *i and *y. [70]

Fricative and zero initials [71] [72]
pMinXiamenFuzhouJianyangYonganExamples
*sssss 三 three, 四 four, 山 mountain, 想 think
*zsssʃ 翼 wing, 蠅 fly, 鹽 salt (n.), 鹽 to salt
*šsssʃ/s 使 use, 聲 voice, 蝨 louse, 詩 poetry, 身 body
*žssss/ʃ 成 become, 是 is, are, 時 time, 熟 mature
*xhhxh/ʃ 好 good, 海 sea, 火 fire, 花 flower (n.), 虎 tiger, 許 Xu (surname)
*ɣhhxh/ʃ 園 garden, 巷 lane, 橫 horizontal, 雨 rain
*ʔ∅∅∅∅ 啞 mute, 應 answer, 椅 chair, 飲 rice-water
*ɦ∅∅∅/h∅ 下 down, 學 learn, 會 able, 鞋 shoe
*∅∅∅∅∅ 圓 round, 後 after, 有 have, exist, 羊 goat, 葯 medicine, 閑 idle, 黃 yellow

In Central Min, *s and *x merged as /ʃ/ before high front vowels. [73]

Tones

Proto-Min had four tone classes, corresponding to the four tones of Middle Chinese: syllables with vocalic or nasal endings belonged to class *A, *B or *C, whereas class *D consisted of the syllables ending in a stop (/p/, /t/ or /k/). [74] As with Middle Chinese and other languages of the Mainland Southeast Asia linguistic area, each of these classes split into upper and lower registers, depending on whether the original initial was voiceless or voiced. [75] When voicing was lost, [lower-alpha 2] the register distinction became phonemic, yielding tone classes conventionally numbered 1 to 8, with tones 1 and 2 naming the upper and lower registers of Proto-Min class A*, and so on. [74] All 8 classes are retained by the Chaozhou dialect, but some have merged in other varieties. Some northern varieties, including the Jianyang dialect, have an additional tone class (tone 9), reflecting a partial merger of tone classes that cannot be predicted from Middle Chinese forms. [77]

Reflexes of Proto-Min tone classes for various types of initials [78] [79] [80]
Tone class *ATone class *BTone class *CTone class *D
*th*t*-t*n*nh*dh*d*-d*th*t*-t*n*nh*dh*d*-d*th*t*-t*n*nh*dh*d*-d*th*t*-t*n*nh*dh*d*-d
Chaozhou12345678
Xiamen12365678
Fuzhou1236565678
Yong'an12345 ? [lower-alpha 3] 574
Jianyang192935596738
Jian'ou1353346453673464
Shaowu1327235 ?65673676

Stop and affricate initials at other points of articulation produce the same tonal reflexes as the dental examples in the above table. Voiceless fricatives have the same tonal reflexes as voiceless aspirated and unaspirated stops. Voiced fricatives are more varied: [82]

The zero initial has the same tonal development as plain sonorants. [83]

Finals

Norman reconstructs Proto-Min finals as consisting of:

The possible combinations were:

Finals of Proto-Min [85]
*e*o*a
*i*ie*io*ia(*iɑ) [lower-alpha 4]
(*uə) [lower-alpha 5] *ua
*y*ye
*əi*oi*ɑi
*iɑi
(*ui) [lower-alpha 6] (*uəi) [lower-alpha 7] (*uai) [lower-alpha 8] *uɑi
*yi(*yəi) [lower-alpha 9]
*eu*əu*au*ɑu
*iu*iau
*em/p(*əm/p) [lower-alpha 10] *am/p*ɑm/p
*im/p*iam/p*iɑm/p
*ən/t*on/t [lower-alpha 11] *an/t*ɑn/t
*in/t*iun/t*ion/t*ian/t*iɑn/t [lower-alpha 12]
*un/t(*uon/t) [lower-alpha 13] (*uan/t) [lower-alpha 14] *uɑn/t
(*yn/t) [lower-alpha 15] (*yan) [lower-alpha 16]
*eŋ/k*əŋ/k*oŋ/k*aŋ/k
*ioŋ/k*iaŋ/k
*uoŋ/k(*uaŋ/k) [lower-alpha 17]
*yŋ/k*yok

The close vowels *i, *u, *y, *e and *ə were short, with stronger following consonants, whereas the open vowels *o, *a and *ɑ were longer, with weaker following consonants. [97] [98]

Proto-Min also had a single word with a syllabic nasal, the usual negator *mC (cognate with Middle Chinese mjɨjH 未 'not have'). [99] [100]

Sound changes leading to modern varieties

Most inland varieties have reduced the nasal codas to a single category. [42] Coastal varieties went through a series of changes that each affected part of the area, and interacted with nasal initials:

Sample developments of nasal codas
SouthernEasternNorthernCentralShao–Jiang
wordProto-MinJieyangXiamenFuzhouFu'anJian'ouJianyangYong'anJiangle
南 south [105] [106] *nəmAnam2lam2naŋ2nam2naŋ5naŋ2nɔ̃2naŋ9
慢 slow [107] [108] *mənCmaŋ6ban6maiŋ6mɛn2maiŋ6maiŋ6mĩ5mãi6
崩 collapse [109] [110] *-peŋApaŋ1paŋ1puŋ1poŋ1paiŋ3vaiŋ9pĩ1pʰãi3
三 three [81] [111] [112] *sɑmAsã1sã1saŋ1sam1saŋ1saŋ1sɔ̃1saŋ1
山 mountain [81] [112] [113] *sɑnAsuã1suã1saŋ1san1sueŋ1sueŋ1sũm1ʃuãi1
生 give birth [112] [114] *saŋAsẽ1sĩ1saŋ1saŋ1saŋ1saŋ1sɔ̃1ʃaŋ1

In most inland varieties stop codas have disappeared, but are marked with separate tonal categories. [42] In coastal varieties, stop codas underwent changes corresponding to those affecting nasal codas:

Sample developments of stop codas
SouthernEasternNorthernCentralShao–Jiang
wordProto-MinJieyangXiamenFuzhouFu'anJian'ouJianyangYong'anJiangle
鴿 dove [106] *kəpDkap7kap7kak7kap7kɔ7kɔ7kɯ7ko7
賊 thief [108] *dzhətDtsʰak8tsʰat8tsʰeik8tsʰɛt8tsʰɛ6tʰe8tsʰa4tsʰa5
北 north [109] *pekDpak7pak7poik7pœk7pɛ7pe7pa7pa3
劦 fit, agree [111] *ɣɑpDhaʔ8haʔ8hak8hap8xɔ6xɔ8haɯ4ho8
葛 dolichos [113] *kɑtDkuaʔ7kuaʔ7kak7kat7kuɛ7kue7kuo7kuai7
客 guest [114] *khakDkʰeʔ7kʰeʔ7kʰaʔ7kʰaʔ7kʰa7kʰa7kʰɔ7kʰa3

Vocabulary

Most Min vocabulary corresponds directly to cognates in other Chinese varieties, but a significant number of distinctively Min words can be reconstructed in proto-Min. In some cases a semantic shift has occurred in Min or the rest of Chinese:

Norman and Mei Tsu-lin have suggested an Austroasiatic origin for some Min words:

In other cases, the origin of the Min word is obscure. Such words include *khauA 骹 'foot', [123] *-tsiɑmB 䭕 'insipid' [99] and *dzyŋC 𧚔 'to wear'. [118]

Notes

  1. ↑ Southern Min varieties also have voiced stops and affricates, which are derived from earlier nasal initials. [42]
  2. ↑ The voiced initials in modern Southern Min varieties are derived from Proto-Min nasal initials. [76]
  3. ↑ For Yong'an, Norman found only one example of a class *C word with a softened voiceless initial, having tone 2. [81]
  4. ↑ The only example of this final, *kiɑA 茄 'eggplant' (Xiamen kio2) is probably a relatively late loan from a Tai language. [86]
  5. ↑ This final is found only after coronal initials. [87]
  6. ↑ This final is found only after velar and glottal initials, and is distinguished from *i only in Southern Min. [88]
  7. ↑ Norman describes the reconstruction of this final as ad hoc, based on only two sets. [87]
  8. ↑ This final is found only after dental initials, and completely consistent examples are rare. [86]
  9. ↑ Norman describes the reconstruction of this final as ad hoc, based on only two sets. [89]
  10. ↑ This final is required to account for Southern Min developments, but few examples are attested across Min. [90]
  11. ↑ There are very few examples of *ot. [91]
  12. ↑ The sole example of *iɑt is found only in coastal Min. [92]
  13. ↑ Norman describes the reconstruction of this final as ad hoc, based on only two sets. [93]
  14. ↑ There are few examples of these finals. [94]
  15. ↑ This final is found only after velar initials, and the few examples of *yt are confined to the coastal dialects. [95]
  16. ↑ There are only two examples of this final, and none of *yat. [94]
  17. ↑ The reconstruction of this final is based on only two sets. [96]

Related Research Articles

In phonetics, aspiration is the strong burst of breath that accompanies either the release or, in the case of preaspiration, the closure of some obstruents. In English, aspirated consonants are allophones in complementary distribution with their unaspirated counterparts, but in some other languages, notably most South Asian languages and East Asian languages, the difference is contrastive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yue Chinese</span> Primary branch of Chinese spoken in southern China

Yue is a branch of the Sinitic languages primarily spoken in Southern China, particularly in the provinces of Guangdong and Guangxi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Min Chinese</span> Primary branch of Sinitic spoken in southern China and Taiwan

Min is a broad group of Sinitic languages with about 70 million native speakers. These languages are spoken in Fujian province as well as by the descendants of Min-speaking colonists on the Leizhou Peninsula and Hainan and by the assimilated natives of Chaoshan, parts of Zhongshan, three counties in southern Wenzhou, the Zhoushan archipelago, Taiwan and scattered in pockets or sporadically across Hong Kong, Macau, and several countries in Southeast Asia, particularly Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Myanmar, Cambodia, Vietnam, Brunei. The name is derived from the Min River in Fujian, which is also the abbreviated name of Fujian Province. Min varieties are not mutually intelligible with one another nor with any other variety of Chinese.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middle Chinese</span> Chinese pronunciation system (601 AD)

Middle Chinese or the Qieyun system (QYS) is the historical variety of Chinese recorded in the Qieyun, a rime dictionary first published in 601 and followed by several revised and expanded editions. The Swedish linguist Bernhard Karlgren believed that the dictionary recorded a speech standard of the capital Chang'an of the Sui and Tang dynasties. However, based on the preface of the Qieyun, most scholars now believe that it records a compromise between northern and southern reading and poetic traditions from the late Northern and Southern dynasties period. This composite system contains important information for the reconstruction of the preceding system of Old Chinese phonology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Varieties of Chinese</span> Family of local language varieties

There are hundreds of local Chinese language varieties forming a branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family, many of which are not mutually intelligible. Variation is particularly strong in the more mountainous southeast part of mainland China. The varieties are typically classified into several groups: Mandarin, Wu, Min, Xiang, Gan, Jin, Hakka and Yue, though some varieties remain unclassified. These groups are neither clades nor individual languages defined by mutual intelligibility, but reflect common phonological developments from Middle Chinese.

Fanqie is a method in traditional Chinese lexicography to indicate the pronunciation of a monosyllabic character by using two other characters, one with the same initial consonant as the desired syllable and one with the same rest of the syllable . The method was introduced in the 3rd century AD and is to some extent still used in commentaries on the classics and dictionaries.

Historical Chinese phonology deals with reconstructing the sounds of Chinese from the past. As Chinese is written with logographic characters, not alphabetic or syllabary, the methods employed in Historical Chinese phonology differ considerably from those employed in, for example, Indo-European linguistics; reconstruction is more difficult because, unlike Indo-European languages, no phonetic spellings were used.

General Chinese is a diaphonemic orthography invented by Yuen Ren Chao to represent the pronunciations of all major varieties of Chinese simultaneously. It is "the most complete genuine Chinese diasystem yet published". It can also be used for the Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese pronunciations of Chinese characters, and challenges the claim that Chinese characters are required for interdialectal communication in written Chinese.

The Sikkimese language, also called Sikkimese, Bhutia, or Drenjongké, Dranjoke, Denjongka, Denzongpeke and Denzongke, belongs to the Tibeto-Burman languages. It is spoken by the Bhutia in Sikkim, India and in parts of Koshi, Nepal. It is the Official Language of Sikkim, India. The Sikkimese people refer to their own language as Drendzongké and their homeland as Drendzong. Up until 1975 Sikkimese was not a written language. After gaining Indian Statehood the language was introduced as a school subject in Sikkim and the written language was developed.

A checked tone, commonly known by the Chinese calque entering tone, is one of the four syllable types in the phonology of Middle Chinese. Although usually translated as "tone", a checked tone is not a tone in the phonetic sense but rather a syllable that ends in a stop consonant or a glottal stop. Separating the checked tone allows -p, -t, and -k to be treated as allophones of -m, -n, and -ng, respectively, since they are in complementary distribution. Stops appear only in the checked tone, and nasals appear only in the other tones. Because of the origin of tone in Chinese, the number of tones found in such syllables is smaller than the number of tones in other syllables. Chinese phonetics have traditionally counted them separately.

Sino-Xenic or Sinoxenic pronunciations are regular systems for reading Chinese characters in Japan, Korea and Vietnam, originating in medieval times and the source of large-scale borrowings of Chinese words into the Japanese, Korean and Vietnamese languages, none of which are genetically related to Chinese. The resulting Sino-Japanese, Sino-Korean and Sino-Vietnamese vocabularies now make up a large part of the lexicons of these languages. The pronunciation systems are used alongside modern varieties of Chinese in historical Chinese phonology, particularly the reconstruction of the sounds of Middle Chinese. Some other languages, such as Hmong–Mien and Kra–Dai languages, also contain large numbers of Chinese loanwords but without the systematic correspondences that characterize Sino-Xenic vocabularies.

Bai is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken in China, primarily in Yunnan Province, by the Bai people. The language has over a million speakers and is divided into three or four main dialects. Bai syllables are always open, with a rich set of vowels and eight tones. The tones are divided into two groups with modal and non-modal phonation. There is a small amount of traditional literature written with Chinese characters, Bowen (僰文), as well as a number of recent publications printed with a recently standardized system of romanisation using the Latin alphabet.

The phonology of Burmese is fairly typical of a Southeast Asian language, involving phonemic tone or register, a contrast between major and minor syllables, and strict limitations on consonant clusters.

Proto-Tai is the reconstructed proto-language of all the Tai languages, including modern Lao, Shan, Tai Lü, Tai Dam, Ahom, Northern Thai, Standard Thai, Bouyei, and Zhuang. The Proto-Tai language is not directly attested by any surviving texts, but has been reconstructed using the comparative method.

Old Mandarin or Early Mandarin was the speech of northern China during the Jurchen-ruled Jin dynasty and the Mongol-led Yuan dynasty. New genres of vernacular literature were based on this language, including verse, drama and story forms, such as the qu and sanqu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Min</span> Chinese language

Northern Min is a group of mutually intelligible Min varieties spoken in Nanping prefecture of northwestern Fujian.

Scholars have attempted to reconstruct the phonology of Old Chinese from documentary evidence. Although the writing system does not describe sounds directly, shared phonetic components of the most ancient Chinese characters are believed to link words that were pronounced similarly at that time. The oldest surviving Chinese verse, in the Classic of Poetry (Shijing), shows which words rhymed in that period. Scholars have compared these bodies of contemporary evidence with the much later Middle Chinese reading pronunciations listed in the Qieyun rime dictionary published in 601 AD, though this falls short of a phonemic analysis. Supplementary evidence has been drawn from cognates in other Sino-Tibetan languages and in Min Chinese, which split off before the Middle Chinese period, Chinese transcriptions of foreign names, and early borrowings from and by neighbouring languages such as Hmong–Mien, Tai and Tocharian languages.

Although Old Chinese is known from written records beginning around 1200 BC, the logographic script provides much more indirect and partial information about the pronunciation of the language than alphabetic systems used elsewhere. Several authors have produced reconstructions of Old Chinese phonology, beginning with the Swedish sinologist Bernhard Karlgren in the 1940s and continuing to the present day. The method introduced by Karlgren is unique, comparing categories implied by ancient rhyming practice and the structure of Chinese characters with descriptions in medieval rhyme dictionaries, though more recent approaches have also incorporated other kinds of evidence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eastern Han Chinese</span> Form of Chinese spoken in the Eastern Han period

Eastern Han Chinese, Later Han Chinese or Late Old Chinese is the stage of the Chinese language revealed by poetry and glosses from the Eastern Han period . It is considered an intermediate stage between Old Chinese and the Middle Chinese of the 7th-century Qieyun dictionary.

Proto-Karenic or Proto-Karen is the reconstructed ancestor of the Karenic languages.

References

  1. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 210, 228.
  2. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 54–55.
  3. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 52–54.
  4. ↑ Norman (1988), p. 181.
  5. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 191, 199–200, 204–205.
  6. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 228–229.
  7. ↑ Ting (1983), pp. 9–10.
  8. 1 2 3 Baxter & Sagart (2014), p. 33.
  9. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), p. 79.
  10. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), p. 76.
  11. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), p. 388, n. 49.
  12. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 211–214.
  13. 1 2 Norman (1991b), pp. 334–336.
  14. ↑ Norman (1991b), pp. 335–336.
  15. ↑ Norman (1991b), p. 328.
  16. ↑ Norman (1988), p. 214.
  17. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), pp. 34–37.
  18. ↑ Norman (1991b), pp. 331–332.
  19. ↑ Sagart (2008), pp. 141–143.
  20. 1 2 Norman (1991b), p. 336.
  21. ↑ Norman (1991b), p. 337.
  22. ↑ Kurpaska (2010), p. 49.
  23. 1 2 Norman (1988), p. 233.
  24. ↑ Yan (2006), p. 121.
  25. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 233–234.
  26. ↑ Kurpaska (2010), p. 52.
  27. ↑ Yan (2006), p. 122.
  28. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 235, 241.
  29. ↑ Branner (1999), pp. 37, 78.
  30. ↑ Branner (2000), pp. 115–116.
  31. ↑ Handel (2010b), pp. 28–29.
  32. ↑ Norman (1974), p. 231.
  33. ↑ Norman (1974), pp. 28–30.
  34. 1 2 Norman (1988), p. 231.
  35. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), pp. 102, 104, 108.
  36. 1 2 3 Norman (1974), p. 28.
  37. 1 2 Norman (1973), p. 231.
  38. ↑ Handel (2003), pp. 49–50.
  39. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), p. 89.
  40. ↑ Handel (2010a).
  41. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), pp. 84–93.
  42. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Norman (1988), p. 237.
  43. ↑ Norman (1973), pp. 228–231.
  44. ↑ Norman (1973), pp. 229–231.
  45. ↑ Norman (1974), pp. 32–33.
  46. ↑ Norman (1986), pp. 380–382.
  47. ↑ Norman (1986), pp. 381–383.
  48. ↑ Norman (1986), p. 381.
  49. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), pp. 88–89.
  50. ↑ Norman (1973), pp. 224–227.
  51. ↑ Branner (1999), p. 40.
  52. ↑ Norman (1973), pp. 226–228.
  53. ↑ Norman (1974), pp. 33–35.
  54. ↑ Norman (1986), pp. 382–383.
  55. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 229–230.
  56. ↑ Norman (1991b), pp. 340–341.
  57. 1 2 Baxter & Sagart (2014), p. 88.
  58. ↑ Norman (1991a), pp. 207–208.
  59. ↑ Norman (1973), pp. 233–235.
  60. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 230, 233.
  61. ↑ Norman (1991a), p. 212.
  62. ↑ Norman (1991a), p. 208.
  63. ↑ Norman (1991a), pp. 211–212.
  64. ↑ Bodman (1985), p. 16.
  65. ↑ Zheng (2016), pp. 84–92.
  66. ↑ Norman (1973), p. 233.
  67. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), pp. 171–173.
  68. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), p. 46.
  69. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), pp. 114, 116.
  70. ↑ Norman (1974), pp. 28–29.
  71. ↑ Norman (1974), pp. 32–35.
  72. ↑ Baxter (1992), pp. 210, 834.
  73. ↑ Zheng (2016), p. 119.
  74. 1 2 Norman (1973), p. 223.
  75. ↑ Handel (2003), p. 49.
  76. 1 2 Norman (1988), pp. 235–236.
  77. ↑ Handel (2003), pp. 55, 68–72.
  78. ↑ Norman (1973), pp. 226, 229, 232–233.
  79. ↑ Norman (1974), pp. 31–32.
  80. ↑ Handel (2003), pp. 58–59.
  81. 1 2 3 Norman (1974), p. 32.
  82. ↑ Norman (1974), pp. 29–30.
  83. ↑ Norman (1974), p. 30.
  84. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 35.
  85. ↑ Norman (1981), pp. 35–36.
  86. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 48.
  87. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 50.
  88. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 41.
  89. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 51.
  90. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 54.
  91. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 59.
  92. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 63.
  93. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 64.
  94. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 65.
  95. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 57.
  96. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 71.
  97. 1 2 3 Norman (1981), p. 36.
  98. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bodman (1985), p. 5.
  99. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 56.
  100. ↑ Norman (1988), p. 234.
  101. ↑ Bodman (1985), pp. 5–9.
  102. 1 2 3 Bodman (1985), p. 7.
  103. ↑ Yan (2006), p. 136.
  104. 1 2 Yan (2006), p. 138.
  105. ↑ Norman (1973), p. 235.
  106. 1 2 Norman (1981), pp. 53–54.
  107. ↑ Norman (1973), p. 234.
  108. 1 2 3 Norman (1981), p. 58.
  109. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 66.
  110. ↑ Norman (1986), p. 382.
  111. 1 2 Norman (1981), pp. 54–55.
  112. 1 2 3 Norman (1991b), p. 352.
  113. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 60.
  114. 1 2 Norman (1981), p. 69.
  115. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 231–232.
  116. ↑ Baxter & Sagart (2014), pp. 59–60.
  117. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 47.
  118. 1 2 Norman (1988), p. 232.
  119. ↑ Norman (1988), pp. 18–19.
  120. ↑ Norman & Mei (1976), pp. 296–297.
  121. ↑ Sagart (2008), p. 142.
  122. ↑ Norman & Mei (1976), pp. 297–298.
  123. ↑ Norman (1981), p. 44.

Works cited

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.