| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
The Willesden East by-election, 1923 was a parliamentary by-election for the British House of Commons constituency of Willesden East held on 3 March 1923. The constituency was a large one extending from Kilburn in the south to the Welsh Harp and on to Neasden.
The by-election was caused by the resignation of the sitting Unionist MP, Sir Harry Mallaby-Deeley. [1] Mallaby-Deeley had been MP for Willesden East since the 1918 general election. [2] Despite the protestations of ill-health which Mallaby-Deeley cited to justify his standing down from Parliament, [3] he lived for another 14 years during which he carried on a substantial business career. [4] The strong likelihood is that Mallaby-Deeley was asked to stand aside and cause a by-election as a route back into Parliament for the Hon. G.F.Stanley, [5]
At the previous General Election, the constituency had become a Unionist/Liberal marginal;
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Harry Mallaby-Deeley | 12,525 | 52.8 | ||
Liberal | Harcourt Johnstone | 11,211 | 47.2 | ||
Majority | 1,314 | 5.6 | |||
Turnout | 23,736 | 58.4 | |||
Unionist hold | Swing |
Controversially in a constituency where over six thousand electors were thought to be Jewish, polling day was fixed for a Saturday. [13] [14] Housing was featuring strongly as an issue of importance at this time. In the by-election at Mitcham being held on the same day as Willesden East, the Unionist candidate was Sir Arthur Griffith-Boscawen. Griffth-Boscawen had lost his seat at Taunton at the general election of November 1922 but accepted Bonar Law’s offer to remain in the government as Minister of Health while he tried to find a seat to get back into Parliament. His main task as minister was to produce a Bill on local government rating but this proved highly controversial and the issue was a magnet for a whole range of problems associated with housing, including the failure of the government to increase the number of houses being built, to be raised at Mitcham and elsewhere, including to Johnstone’s advantage at Willesden. [15] [16] [17] It was reported that the loss of the by-election would represent a blow for the Unionist government, although it was too early after the general election to see the results as a definitive verdict on Bonar Law’s administration. [18]
The result was a gain for the Liberal Party from the Unionists with Johnstone gaining 60% of the poll and a majority of 5,176 over Stanley.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Harcourt Johnstone | 14,824 | 60.6 | +13.4 | |
Unionist | George Frederick Stanley | 9,648 | 39.4 | -13.4 | |
Majority | 5,176 | 21.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 24,472 | 60.2 | +1.8 | ||
Liberal gain from Unionist | Swing | +13.4 | |||
The Liberal victory was described by Austen Chamberlain as a “smash” and a bad omen for the by-election at Mitcham being held on the same day, [20] which the Unionists also lost, this time to Labour. Clearly the absence of a Labour candidate at Willesden meant the Liberals were able to present Johnstone as the only progressive and anti-Tory candidate. [21] This tactical advantage was underscored by an unproved allegation against Stanley that he or his supporters had tried to bribe a Labour man into standing as a candidate for the purpose of splitting the Liberal vote. [22]
The loss of Willesden by such a large majority was unexpected [23]
It was hard to discern Willesden as part of any pattern of political success for the Liberal Party. Cook and Ramsden in their survey of British by-elections comment that none of the by-elections in the 1922-1923 Parliament pointed to the outcome of Stanley Baldwin’s Tariff reform general election of 6 December 1923. [24] At that election, Johnstone narrowly held the seat despite the intervention of a Labour party candidate.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Harcourt Johnstone | 11,260 | 40.5 | ||
Unionist | George Frederick Stanley | 11,146 | 40.1 | ||
Labour | Joseph George Butler | 5,392 | 19.4 | ||
Majority | 114 | 0.4 | |||
Turnout | 27,798 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing |
West Renfrewshire was a county constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1885 to 1983 and again from 1997 until 2005. In 2005 the constituency was abolished and the area is now represented by Inverclyde, Paisley and Renfrewshire North and Paisley and Renfrewshire South.
Wednesbury was a borough constituency in England's Black Country which returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1868 until it was abolished for the February 1974 general election.
Harrow was a constituency of the House of Commons of the UK Parliament 1885—1945 in Middlesex, a traditional county; it covered an area forming part of the north-west of today's Greater London. It returned one Member of Parliament (MP).
The Eastbourne by-election, 1925 was a parliamentary by-election for the British House of Commons constituency of Eastbourne, Sussex on 17 June 1925.
The Combined Scottish Universities by-election, 1936 was a by-election held from 27 to 31 January 1936 for the Combined Scottish Universities, a university constituency of the British House of Commons.
The Middlesbrough West by-election, 1945 was a parliamentary by-election held on 14 May 1945 for the House of Commons constituency of Middlesbrough West.
The Middlesbrough West by-election, 1940 was a parliamentary by-election held on 7 August 1940 for the British House of Commons constituency of Middlesbrough West.
Harcourt Johnstone, nicknamed Crinks, was a British Liberal Party politician.
The Westminster Abbey by-election, 1924 was a parliamentary by-election held on 19 March 1924 for the British House of Commons constituency of Westminster Abbey in London. It was notable for the challenge of Winston Churchill to the party system.
Sir Harry Deeley Mallaby-Deeley, 1st Baronet was a British Conservative Party politician.
The Bodmin by-election, 1922 was a parliamentary by-election for the British House of Commons. The constituency of Bodmin in Cornwall polled on 24 February 1922. The by-election was notable for the opposition Liberal Party gaining a seat from the Coalition supporting Conservative Party.
The Middlesbrough West by-election, 1928 was a parliamentary by-election held for the British House of Commons constituency of Middlesbrough West on 7 March 1928.
Edwin Stanley Gange was an English merchant and Liberal politician.
The St Albans by-election of 1919 was a parliamentary by-election held in England in December 1919 for the House of Commons constituency of St Albans in Hertfordshire.
This was a parliamentary by-election for the British House of Commons constituency of Stourbridge. Stourbridge was one of the Worcestershire constituencies, bordering Bewdley, where the Conservative Prime Minister, Stanley Baldwin sat.
The Ludlow by-election, 1923 was a parliamentary by-election for the British House of Commons constituency of Ludlow, Shropshire, on 19 April 1923.
The Tavistock by-election, 1928 was a parliamentary by-election for the British House of Commons constituency of Tavistock on 11 October 1928.
The Westbury by-election, 1927 was a by-election held on 16 June 1927 for the British House of Commons constituency of Westbury.
The Ilford by-election, 1928 was a parliamentary by-election for the British House of Commons constituency of Ilford, London on 23 February 1928.
Constitutionalist was a label used by some British politicians standing for Parliament in the 1920s, instead of the more traditional party labels. The label was used primarily by former supporters of the David-Lloyd-George-led coalition government, and most notably by Winston Churchill. However, there was no party organisation called the Constitutionalist Party.