Admission to the bar in the United States

Last updated

Admission to the bar in the United States is the granting of permission by a particular court system to a lawyer to practice law in the jurisdiction and before those courts. Each U.S. state and similar jurisdiction (e.g. territories under federal control) has its own court system and sets its own rules for bar admission, which can lead to different admission standards among states. In most cases, a person is "admitted" or "called" to the bar of the highest court in the jurisdiction and is thereby authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction. Federal courts, although often overlapping in admission standards with states, set their own requirements for practice in each of those courts.


In the typical process, lawyers seeking admission are required to earn a Juris Doctor degree from a law school approved by the jurisdiction, pass an exam administered by the regulating authority of that jurisdiction, pass a professional responsibility examination, and undergo a character and fitness evaluation. However, there are exceptions to each of these requirements.

A lawyer who is admitted in one state is not automatically allowed to practice in any other. Some states have reciprocal agreements that allow attorneys from other states to practice without sitting for another full bar exam; such arrangements differ significantly among states and among federal courts.


The bar (railing) at the Rhode Island Supreme Court Bar at the Rhode Island Supreme Court.jpg
The bar (railing) at the Rhode Island Supreme Court

The use of the term "bar" to mean "the whole body of lawyers, the legal profession" comes ultimately from English custom. In the early 16th century, a railing divided the hall in the Inns of Court, with students occupying the body of the hall and readers or Benchers on the other side. Students who officially became lawyers were "called to the bar", crossing the symbolic physical barrier and thus "admitted to the bar". [1] Later, this was popularly assumed to mean the wooden railing marking off the area around the judge's seat in a courtroom, where prisoners stood for arraignment and where a barrister stood to plead. In modern courtrooms, a railing may still be in place to enclose the space which is occupied by legal counsel as well as the criminal defendants and civil litigants who have business pending before the court.


The first bar exam in what is now the United States was instituted by Delaware Colony in 1763, as an oral examination before a judge. Many other American colonies soon followed suit. [2] In the early United States, most states' requirements for admission to the bar included a period of study under a lawyer or judge (a practice called "reading the law") and a brief examination. [3] Examinations were generally oral, and applicants were sometimes exempted from the examination if they had clerked in a law office for a certain number of years. [4] During the 19th century, admission requirements became lower in many states. Most states continued to require both a period of apprenticeship and some form of examination, but these periods became shorter and examinations were generally brief and casual. [4]

After 1870, law schools began to emerge across the United States as an alternative to apprenticeship. This rise was accompanied by the practice of diploma privilege, wherein graduates of law schools would receive automatic admission to the bar. Diploma privilege reached its peak between 1879 and 1921. [4] In most states, diploma privilege only applied to those who had graduated law school in the state where they practiced. [5] Examinations continued to exist during this period as requirements for those ineligible for diploma privilege, and were often administered by committees of attorneys. [2] Between 1890 and 1920, most states replaced oral examinations with written bar examinations. [4] Written examinations became commonplace as lawyers began to practice in states other than those where they were trained. [3] [4]

In 1921, the American Bar Association formally expressed a preference for required written bar examinations in place of diploma privilege for law school graduates. In subsequent decades, the prevalence of diploma privilege declined deeply. [4] [5] By 1948, only 13 law schools in 9 states retained diploma privilege. By 1980, only Mississippi, Montana, South Dakota, West Virginia, and Wisconsin honored diploma privilege. [5] [6] As of 2020, only Wisconsin allows J.D. graduates of accredited law schools to seek admission to the state bar without passing a bar examination. [7] [8] [9]

Admission requirements

Today, each state or U.S. jurisdiction has its own rules which are the ultimate authority concerning admission to its bar. Generally, admission to a bar requires that the candidate do the following:

Educational requirement

Most jurisdictions require that candidates earn a Juris Doctor degree from an approved law school, usually meaning a school accredited by the American Bar Association (ABA). [10] [lower-alpha 1] Exceptions include Alabama, California, [11] Connecticut, Massachusetts, West Virginia, and Tennessee, which allow individuals to take the bar exam upon graduation from law schools approved by state bodies but not accredited by the ABA. The state of New York makes special provision for persons educated to degree-level in common law from overseas, with most LLB degree holders being qualified to take the bar exam and, upon passing, be admitted to the bar. [12] In California, certain law schools "registered" with the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar of California (CBE) [13] are authorized to grant Juris Doctor degrees although they are not accredited by the ABA or CBE. Students at these schools must take and pass the First-Year Law Students' Examination (commonly referred to as the "Baby Bar") administered by the CBE, and may continue their studies to obtain their J.D. degree upon passage of this exam. [11]

A few jurisdictions (California, Maine, New York, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia) allow applicants to study under a judge or practicing attorney for an extended period of time rather than attending law school. [14] [15] [16] This method is known as "reading law" or "reading the law". New York allows applicants who are reading the law, but only if they have at least one year of law school study. [17] Maine allows students with two years of law school to serve an apprenticeship in lieu of completing their third year. New Hampshire's only law school has an alternative licensing program that allows students who have completed certain curricula and a separate exam to bypass the regular bar examination. [18] Until the late 19th century, reading the law was common and law schools were rare. For example, Abraham Lincoln did not attend law school, and did not even read with anyone else, stating in his autobiography that he "studied with nobody". [19]

The American legal system is unusual in that it has no formal apprenticeship or clinical training requirements prior to admission to the bar, with a few exceptions. Delaware requires that candidates for admission to the bar serve five months in a clerkship with a lawyer in the state. [20] Vermont had a similar requirement but eliminated it in 2016. [21] Washington requires, since 2005, that applicants must complete a minimum of four hours of approved pre-admission education. [22] [23] Some law schools have tried to rectify this lack of experience by requiring supervised "Public Service Requirements" of all graduates. [24] States that encourage law students to undergo clinical training or perform public service in the form of pro bono representation may allow students to appear and practice in limited court settings under the supervision of an admitted attorney. [lower-alpha 2]

Professional responsibility requirement

In all jurisdictions except Puerto Rico and Wisconsin, candidates must pass the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE), which covers the professional responsibility rules governing lawyers. [27] This test is not administered separately from bar examinations, and most candidates usually sit for the MPRE while still in law school, right after studying professional responsibility (a required course in all ABA-accredited law schools). Some states require that a candidate pass the MPRE before being allowed to sit for the bar exam. Connecticut and New Jersey waive the MPRE for candidates who have received a grade of C or better in a law school professional ethics class.[ citation needed ]

Bar examination requirement

In all jurisdictions except Wisconsin, candidates are required to pass a bar examination, usually administered by the state bar association or under the authority of the supreme court of the particular state. Wisconsin is the only state that does not require the bar examination; graduates of ABA-accredited law schools in the state may be admitted to the state bar through diploma privilege.

State bar examinations are usually administered by the state bar association or under the authority of the supreme court of the particular state. In 2011, the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) created the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE), which has since been adopted by 37 jurisdictions (out of a possible 56). [28] The UBE consists of three parts: the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE), a standardized test consisting of 200 multiple-choice questions; the Multistate Essay Examination (MEE), a uniform though not standardized test that examines a candidate's ability to analyze legal issues and communicate them effectively in writing; and the Multistate Performance Test (MPT), a "closed-universe" test in which each candidate is required to perform a standard lawyering task, such as a memo or brief.

Non-UBE jurisdictions usually also include a combination of multiple-choice questions, essay questions, and performance tests. Many jurisdictions use some NCBE-created components. For example, all jurisdictions except Louisiana and Puerto Rico use the MBE. Many states also use state-specific content is usually included in the examination, such as essays in Washington, Minnesota and Massachusetts. Some states, such as Florida, include both essays and multiple-choice questions in their state-specific sections; Virginia uses full essays and short-answer questions in its state-specific section.[ citation needed ]

Character and fitness requirement

Most states also require an applicant to demonstrate good moral character. Character Committees look to an applicant's history to determine whether the person will be fit to practice law in the future. This history may include prior criminal arrests or convictions, academic honor code violations, prior bankruptcies or evidence of financial irresponsibility, addictions or psychiatric disorders, sexual misconduct, prior civil lawsuits or driving history. [29] In recent years, such investigations have increasingly focused on the extent of an applicant's financial debt, as increased student loans have prompted concern for whether a new lawyer will honor legal or financial obligations. For example, in early 2009, a person who had passed the New York bar and had over $400,000 in unpaid student loans was denied admission by the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division due to excessive indebtedness, despite being recommended for admission by the state's character and fitness committee. [30] He moved to void the denial, but the court upheld its original decision in November 2009, by which time his debt had accumulated to nearly $500,000. [31] More recently, the Court of Appeals of Maryland rejected the application of a candidate who displayed a pattern of financial irresponsibility, applied for a car loan with false information, and failed to disclose a recent bankruptcy. [32]

When applying to take a state's bar examination, applicants are required to complete extensive questionnaires seeking the disclosure of significant personal, financial and professional information. For example, in Virginia, each applicant must complete a 24-page questionnaire [33] and may appear before a committee for an interview if the committee initially rejects their application. [34] The same is true in the State of Maryland, and in many other jurisdictions, where the state's supreme court has the ultimate authority to determine whether an applicant will be admitted to the bar. [35] In completing the bar application, and at all stages of this process, honesty is paramount. An applicant who fails to disclose material facts, no matter how embarrassing or problematic, will greatly jeopardize the applicant's chance of practicing law. [29]

Formal admission

Once all prerequisites have been satisfied, an attorney must formally apply for admission. The mechanics of this final stage vary widely. For example, in California, the admittee simply takes an oath before any state judge or notary public, who then co-signs the admission form. Upon receiving the signed form, the State Bar of California adds the new admittee to a list of applicants recommended for admission to the bar which is automatically ratified by the Supreme Court of California at its next regular weekly conference; then everyone on the list is added to the official roll of attorneys. The State Bar also holds large-scale formal admission ceremonies in conjunction with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the federal district courts, usually in the same convention centers where new admittees took the bar examination, but these are optional. In other jurisdictions, such as the District of Columbia, new admittees must attend a special session of court in person to take the oath of admission in open court; they cannot take the oath before any available judge or notary public.[ citation needed ]

A successful applicant is permitted to practice law after being sworn in as an officer of the Court; in most states, that means they may begin filing pleadings and appearing as counsel of record in any trial or appellate court in the state. Upon admission, a new lawyer is issued a certificate of admission, usually from the state's highest court, and a membership card attesting to admission.[ citation needed ]

Two states are exceptions to the general rule of admission by the state's highest court. In New York, admission is granted by one of the state's four intermediate appellate courts corresponding generally to the Department of residence of the applicant; once admitted, however, the applicant can practice in any (non-federal) court in the state. [36] In Georgia, each new attorney is admitted to practice by the Superior Court of any county, typically the county in which he or she resides or desires to practice. The new attorney, although licensed to practice in any local trial court in the state, must separately seek admission to the Georgia Court of Appeals as well as the Georgia Supreme Court. [37]

In most states, lawyers are also issued a unique bar identification number. In states like California where unauthorized practice of law is a major problem,[ clarification needed ] the state bar number must appear on all documents submitted by a lawyer. [38]

Tactical considerations regarding admission in multiple states

Most attorneys seek and obtain admission only to the bar of one state, and then rely upon pro hac vice admissions for the occasional out-of-state matter. However, many new attorneys do seek admission in multiple states, either by taking multiple bar exams or applying for reciprocity. This is common for those living and working in metro areas which sprawl into multiple states, such as Washington, D.C. and New York City. Attorneys based in predominantly rural states or rural areas near state borders frequently seek admission in multiple states in order to enlarge their client base.

Note that in states that allow reciprocity, admission on motion may have conditions that do not apply to those admitted by examination. For example, attorneys admitted on motion in Virginia are required to show evidence of the intent to practice full-time in Virginia and are prohibited from maintaining an office in any other jurisdiction. Also, their licenses automatically expire when they no longer maintain an office in Virginia. [39] [40]

Types of state bar associations

Admission to a state's bar is not necessarily the same as membership in that state's bar association. There are two kinds of state bar associations:

Mandatory (integrated) bar

Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia require membership in the state's bar association to practice law there. [41] This arrangement is called having a mandatory, unified, or integrated bar.

For example, the State Bar of Texas is an agency of the judiciary and is under the administrative control of the Texas Supreme Court, [42] and is composed of those persons licensed to practice law in Texas; each such person is required by law to join the State Bar by registering with the clerk of the Texas Supreme Court. [43]

Voluntary and private bar associations

A voluntary bar association is a private organization of lawyers. Each may have social, educational, and lobbying functions, but does not regulate the practice of law or admit lawyers to practice or discipline lawyers. An example of this is the New York State Bar Association.

There is a statewide voluntary bar association in each of the eighteen states that have no mandatory or integrated bar association. There are also many voluntary bar associations organized by geographic area (e.g., Chicago Bar Association), interest group or practice area (e.g., Federal Communications Bar Association), or ethnic or identity community (e.g., Hispanic National Bar Association).

The American Bar Association (ABA) is a nationwide voluntary bar association with the largest membership in the United States. The National Bar Association was formed in 1925 to focus on the interests of African-American lawyers after they were denied membership by the ABA. [44]

Federal courts

Admission to a state bar does not automatically entitle an individual to practice in federal courts, such as the United States district courts or United States court of appeals. In general, an attorney is admitted to the bar of these federal courts upon payment of a fee and taking an oath of admission. An attorney must apply to each district separately. For instance, a Texas attorney who practices in federal courts throughout the state would have to be admitted separately to the Northern District of Texas, the Eastern District, the Southern District, and the Western District. To handle a federal appeal, the attorney would also be required to be admitted separately to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for general appeals and to the Federal Circuit for appeals that fall within that court's jurisdiction. As the bankruptcy courts are divisions of the district courts, admission to a particular district court usually includes automatic admission to the corresponding bankruptcy court. The bankruptcy courts require that attorneys attend training sessions on electronic filing before they may file motions.

Some federal district courts have extra admission requirements. For instance, the Southern District of Texas requires attorneys seeking admission to attend a class on that District's practice and procedures. For some time, the Southern District of Florida administered an entrance exam, but that requirement was eliminated by Court order in February 2012. [45] The District of Rhode Island requires candidates to attend classes and to pass an examination.

An attorney wishing to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States must apply to do so, must be admitted to the bar of the highest court of a state for three years, must be sponsored by two attorneys already admitted to the Supreme Court bar, must pay a fee and must take either a spoken or written oath. [46]

Various specialized courts with subject-matter jurisdiction, including the United States Tax Court, have separate admission requirements. The Tax Court is unusual in that a non-attorney may be admitted to practice. However, the non-attorney must take and pass an examination administered by the Court to be admitted, while attorneys are not required to take the exam. Most members of the Tax Court bar are attorneys.

Admission to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is open to any attorney admitted to practice and in good standing with the U.S. Supreme Court, any of the other federal courts of appeal, any federal district court, the highest court of any state, the Court of International Trade, the Court of Federal Claims, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, or the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. An oath and fee are required. [47]

Some federal courts also have voluntary bar associations associated with them. For example, the Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit, the Bar Association of the Third Federal Circuit, or the Association of the Bar of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit all serve attorneys admitted to practice before specific federal courts of appeals.

District Court Reciprocity

United States District Court reciprocity map United States District Court Reciprocity Map.png
United States District Court reciprocity map

56 districts (around 60% of all district courts) require an attorney to be admitted to practice in the state where the district court sits. The other 39 districts (around 40% of all district courts) extend admission to certain lawyers admitted in other states, although conditions vary from court to court. Only 13 districts extend admission to attorneys admitted to any U.S. state bar. [48] This requirement is not necessarily consistent within a state. For example, in Ohio, the Southern District generally requires membership in the Ohio state bar for full admission, [49] while full admission to the Northern District is open to all attorneys in good standing with any U.S. jurisdiction. [50] [51] In the Northern District of Ohio, admitted attorneys need not maintain an office in the district, or associate with a local attorney, unless ordered to do so by the court. [50] [51] The District of Vermont requires membership in the Vermont State Bar or membership in the Bar of a federal district court in the First and Second Circuits. [52] The District of Connecticut, within the Second Circuit, will admit any member of the Connecticut bar or of the bar of any United States District Court. [53]

Patent practice

Persons wishing to "prosecute" patent applications (i.e., represent clients in the process of obtaining a patent) must first pass the USPTO registration examination, frequently referred to as the "patent bar." Detailed information about applying for the registration examination is available in the USPTO's General Requirements Bulletin. [54] Although only registered patent attorneys or patent agents can prosecute patent applications in the USPTO, passing the patent bar is not necessary to advise clients on patent infringement, to litigate patent issues in court, or to prosecute trademark applications.

A J.D. degree is not required to sit for the patent bar. Lawyers who pass the patent bar exam may refer to themselves as a patent attorney (rules of legal ethics prohibit lawyers from using the title "patent attorney" unless they are admitted to practice before the USPTO). While patent lawyers have a relevant four-year degree and many have graduate technical degrees, patent litigation attorneys do not have to be patent attorneys, although some are. On the other hand, non-lawyers who pass the patent bar are referred to as "patent agents." Patent agents may not hold themselves out as licensed attorneys.

Applicants must have U.S. citizenship, permanent residency (a Green Card), or a valid work visa for a patent-related job. An applicant on a work visa, upon passing the exam, is only given "limited recognition" to perform work for the employer listed on the work visa. Only U.S. citizens can maintain their registration in the patent bar while they are working outside the United States. Additionally, the USPTO requires that applicants to the patent bar have earned a bachelor's degree. Applicants are categorized as having earned an accredited "bachelor's degree in a recognized technical subject" (category A), having earned a "bachelor's degree in another subject" with sufficient credits to qualify for the exam (category B), or having "practical engineering or scientific experience" (category C).

Applicants in "category A" must have an engineering or "hard science" degree in a field listed in the General Requirements Bulletin. Note that the degree field as shown on the diploma must be exactly as it appears on the list; for example, "aerospace engineering" does not qualify under category A, while "aeronautical engineering" does. A computer science degree is accepted under "category A" as long as it is received from an Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)-accredited or CSAB-accredited program.

Applicants in "category B" must have earned a bachelor's degree, and must have sufficient credits in science and engineering courses to meet the USPTO's requirements; the number of credits depends on the specific discipline. The coursework must include a minimum of eight credit-hours of acceptable classes in either chemistry or physics. Each course being relied upon by the applicant for credit is evaluated by the USPTO's Office of Enrollment and Discipline for suitability; see the General Requirements Bulletin for the details. Engineering and Computer Science majors whose degree programs do not meet "category A" requirements (typically due to the named field of the degree or, especially in computer science, lack of program accreditation) can apply under "category B."

Applicants in "category C" may present evidence of passing the Fundamentals of Engineering exam as proof of technical education. They must also have a bachelor's degree. Although the admission requirements allow applicants to substitute proof of technical experience for technical education, this is rarely done in practice.

Military law

Service as a member of a military service's Judge Advocate General's Corps requires graduation from an ABA-accredited law school, a license to practice law in any state or territory of the United States, and training at the specialized law school of one of the three military services (The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School for the Army, the Naval Justice School for the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, and the Air Force Judge Advocate General School for the Air Force).

In a court-martial, the accused is always provided JAG Corps defense counsel at no expense to the accused, but is also entitled to retain private civilian counsel at his or her own expense. Civilian counsel must either be a member of both a federal bar and a state bar, or must be otherwise authorized to practice law by a recognized licensing authority and certified by the military judge as having sufficient familiarity with criminal law as applicable in courts-martial. [55]


  1. Indeed, in certain states, e.g., Arizona, one may not actually take the bar exam unless one's law school is ABA accredited, and this requirement has withstood constitutional attack[ citation needed ]
  2. For example, in New York's Third Appellate Department, "Any officer or agency of the state ... or any legal aid organization ... may make application to the presiding justice of this court for an order authorizing the employment or utilization of law students who have completed at least two semesters of law school and eligible law school graduates as law interns to render and perform legal services ... which the officer, agency or organization making the application is authorized to perform." [25] Similarly, New York's state Department of Labor allows law students to practice in unemployment benefits hearings before the agency. [26]

Related Research Articles

Barrister Lawyer specialised in court representation in England and Wales, and some other jurisdictions

A barrister is a type of lawyer in common law jurisdictions. Barristers mostly specialise in courtroom advocacy and litigation. Their tasks include taking cases in superior courts and tribunals, drafting legal pleadings, researching the philosophy, hypothesis and history of law, and giving expert legal opinions.

Advocate Profession in the field of law

An advocate is a professional in the field of law. Different countries' legal systems use the term with somewhat differing meanings. The broad equivalent in many English law–based jurisdictions could be a barrister or a solicitor. However, in Scottish, Manx Law, South African, Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Scandinavian, Polish, Israeli, South Asian and South American jurisdictions, "Advocate" indicates a lawyer of superior classification.

United States district court trial court of the United States federal court system

The United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal judiciary. Both civil and criminal cases are filed in district courts, each of which is a court of law, equity, and admiralty. There is a United States bankruptcy court associated with each United States district court. Each federal judicial district has at least one courthouse, and many districts have more than one. Most decisions of district courts may be appealed to the respective court of appeals of their circuit, with a small number instead being appealable to the Federal Circuit, or directly to the Supreme Court.

An attorney at law in the United States is a practitioner in a court of law who is legally qualified to prosecute and defend actions in court on the retainer of clients. Alternative terms include counselor and lawyer. As of April 2011, there were 1,225,452 licensed attorneys in the United States. A 2012 survey conducted by LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell determined 58 million consumers in the U.S. sought an attorney in the last year and that 76 percent of consumers used the Internet to search for an attorney.

A bar association is a professional association of lawyers as generally organized in countries following the Anglo-American types of jurisprudence. The word bar is derived from the old English/European custom of using a physical railing to separate the area in which court business is done from the viewing area for the general public.

Legal education Education in topics related to law

Legal education is the education of individuals in the principles, practices, and theory of law. It may be undertaken for several reasons, including to provide the knowledge and skills necessary for admission to legal practice in a particular jurisdiction, to provide a greater breadth of knowledge to those working in other professions such as politics or business, to provide current lawyers with advanced training or greater specialisation, or to update lawyers on recent developments in the law.

The call to the bar is a legal term of art in most common law jurisdictions where persons must be qualified to be allowed to argue in court on behalf of another party and are then said to have been "called to the bar" or to have received "call to the bar." "The bar" is now used as a collective noun for barristers, but literally referred to the wooden barrier in old courtrooms, which separated the often crowded public area at the rear from the space near the judges reserved for those having business with the Court. Barristers would sit or stand immediately behind it, facing the judge, and could use it as a table for their briefs.

Bar (law) Legal profession as an institution

In law, the bar is the legal profession as an institution, which originates from the'passing the Bar' which the synonym of is British Accredited Registry, a throwback to Americas legal origins which are based in British law. The term is a metonym for the line that separates the parts of a courtroom reserved for spectators and those reserved for participants in a trial such as lawyers.

A bar examination is an examination administered by the bar association of a jurisdiction that a lawyer must pass in order to be admitted to the bar of that jurisdiction.

A patent attorney is an attorney who has the specialized qualifications necessary for representing clients in obtaining patents and acting in all matters and procedures relating to patent law and practice, such as filing patent applications and oppositions to granted patents. The term is used differently in different countries, and thus may or may not require the same legal qualifications as a general legal practitioner.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court enunciated a rule of civil procedure known as the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The doctrine holds that lower United States federal courts may not sit in direct review of state court decisions.

State Bar of California

The State Bar of California is California's official attorney licensing agency. It is responsible for managing the admission of lawyers to the practice of law, investigating complaints of professional misconduct, prescribing appropriate discipline, accepting attorney-member fees, and financially distributing sums paid through attorney trust accounts to fund nonprofit legal entities. It is directly responsible to the Supreme Court of California, however, its Trustees are now appointed by the Supreme Court, the California Legislature, and Governor of California. All attorney admissions are issued as recommendations of the State Bar, which are then routinely ratified by the Supreme Court. Attorney discipline is handled by the State Bar Office of Chief Trial Counsel, which acts as prosecutor before the State Bar Court of California.

Law school Institution specializing in legal education

A law school is an institution specializing in legal education, usually involved as part of a process for becoming a lawyer within a given jurisdiction.

In the United States, the diploma privilege is a method for lawyers to be admitted to the bar without taking a bar examination. Wisconsin is the only jurisdiction that currently allows diploma privilege as an alternative to the bar examination.

An admission to practice law is acquired when a lawyer receives a license to practice law. In jurisdictions with two types of lawyer, as with barristers and solicitors, barristers must gain admission to the bar whereas for solicitors there are distinct practising certificates.

The Louisiana Bar Exam is a three-day-long examination used to determine whether a candidate is qualified to practice law in the state of Louisiana. It is the longest bar exam in the United States, consisting of 21 hours of examination on nine topic areas. To sit for the exam, an applicant must graduate from an ABA accredited law school and be deemed of good moral character.

In the law of the United States, admission on motion refers to a procedure by which an attorney admitted to practice in one state or territory may obtain admission to practice in another state or territory without having to sit for the other jurisdiction's bar examination. Instead, they simply file a motion or application with the state supreme court, board of bar examiners, or state bar association of the other jurisdiction, which typically must be accompanied by certificates of good standing from all other jurisdictions in which they are admitted and sufficient personal information to facilitate a background check of good moral character.

Reading law is the method by which persons in common law countries, particularly the United States, entered the legal profession before the advent of law schools. This usage specifically refers to a means of entering the profession. Reading the law consists of an extended internship or apprenticeship under the tutelage or mentoring of an experienced lawyer. A small number of U.S. jurisdictions still permit this practice today.

In the United States, a federal attorney or federal court attorney is an attorney who has been admitted to practice before a Federal court for a particular jurisdiction.

Bar examination in the United States

Bar examinations in the United States are examinations administered to candidates for admission to the bar in U.S. states and territories. Bar exams are administered by states or territories, generally by agencies under the authority of state supreme courts. Bar examinations are currently required for admission to the bar in all U.S. jurisdictions except Wisconsin. Almost all states use some examination components created by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE). 41 jurisdictions have adopted the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE), which is composed entirely of NCBE-created components.


  1. "Etymology: Bar". Retrieved December 11, 2006.
  2. 1 2 "California Bar Examination: Information and History" (PDF). The State Bar of California. p. 3. Retrieved June 27, 2011.
  3. 1 2 Goforth, Carol (February 18, 2015). "Why the Bar Examination Fails to Raise the Bar". Ohio Northern University Law Review. 42 (1): 47–88.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hansen, Daniel (January 1, 1995). "Do We Need the Bar Examination--A Critical Evaluation of the Justifications for the Bar Examination and Proposed Alternatives ?". Case Western Reserve Law Review. 45 (4): 1191–1235. ISSN   0008-7262.
  5. 1 2 3 Goldman, Thomas (January 1, 1974). "Use of the Diploma Privilege in the United States". Tulsa Law Review. 10 (1): 36.
  6. Hylton, J. Gordon (January 21, 2014). "Iowa Supreme Court Contemplating Diploma Privilege – Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog" . Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  7. Ward, Stephanie Francis (April 21, 2020). "Bar exam does little to ensure attorney competence, say lawyers in diploma privilege state". ABA Journal. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  8. Olson, Elizabeth (March 19, 2015). "Bar Exam, the Standard to Become a Lawyer, Comes Under Fire". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  9. Strauss, Valerie (July 13, 2020). "Why this pandemic is a good time to stop forcing prospective lawyers to take bar exams". Washington Post. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  10. "Law School Admission Council "Thinking About Law School?", page 4" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 3, 2010. Retrieved October 29, 2010.
  11. 1 2 "Admissions". The State Bar of California.
  12. "The Idiot's Guide to Sitting the New York Bar Exam with a Foreign Law Degree".
  13. "The State Bar of California".
  14. National Conference of Bar Examiners and American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar (2020). "Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2020" (PDF). Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  15. "Rule 6 Law Clerk Program". Washington State Bar Association. 2002. Archived from the original on April 9, 2003. Retrieved March 4, 2007.
  16. "State Special Reciprocity Rules". Online Bar Reciprocity Database. BarReciprocity LLC. Retrieved November 21, 2011.
  17. "Study of Law In a Law Office". Rules of the Court.
  18. "Daniel Webster Scholar Honors Program". University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law. September 10, 2018. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  19. with nobody"#v=onepage&q="studied with nobody"&f=false Lincoln, by David Herbert Donald (1996), p55
  20. "Frequently Asked Questions - Board of Bar Examiners - Supreme Court - Delaware Courts - State of Delaware". Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  21. "Transitional Policy for Clerkships Completed Under Prior Rule § 6(i)" (PDF). Delaware Board of Bar Examiners. 2016. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  22. "Admission to Practice Rule 5". Washington State Supreme Court. Archived from the original on March 4, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2008.
  23. "Admission to Practice Rule 18". Washington State Supreme Court. Retrieved March 7, 2008.
  24. "University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law Public Service Requirement". State of New York Courts. Archived from the original on October 25, 2006. Retrieved March 7, 2008.
  25. "Part 805: Admission of Attorneys". State of New York Courts. Retrieved March 7, 2008.
  26. "Need Help With Unemployment Benefits?". State of New York Department of Labor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2008.
  27. "Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  28. "Uniform Bar Examination". NCBE. Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  29. 1 2 "Common Character Concerns: Are You Fit to Admit?". Irwin R. Kramer, Esquire. Retrieved June 12, 2016.
  30. Glater, Jonathan D. (July 1, 2009). "Finding Debt a Bigger Hurdle Than Bar Exam". The New York Times. Retrieved September 4, 2010.
  31. Glater, Jonathan D. (November 26, 2009). "Again, Debt Disqualifies Applicant From the Bar". The New York Times. Retrieved October 6, 2010.
  32. "Application of T. Z.-A. O. to the Bar of Maryland". December 22, 2014. Retrieved June 12, 2016.
  33. "Character & Fitness Questionnaire" (PDF). Virginia Board of Bar Examiners. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2010. Retrieved September 4, 2010.
  34. "Admission Rules Section III". Rules of the Virginia Board of Bar Examiners. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners. Archived from the original on October 12, 2010. Retrieved September 4, 2010.
  35. "Maryland's Bar Admission Process". Irwin R. Kramer, Esquire.
  36. "Admission Information". The New York State Board of Law Examiners. Archived from the original on November 14, 2010. Retrieved November 9, 2010.
  37. "Part B, Section 15. Duty of Judges After Receiving Certificate of the Board". Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 1, 2018.
  38. See, e.g., California Rules of Court, Rule 2.111.
  39. Supreme Court of Virginia. "Rules & Regulations for Admission on Motion". Virginia Board of Bar Examiners. Retrieved April 29, 2010.
  40. "Rules for Admission on Motion". Database of Reciprocity and Admission Rules. Retrieved November 21, 2011.
  41. "State and Local Bar Associations". American Bar Association . Retrieved January 8, 2010.
  42. See Texas Government Code section 81.011.
  43. See Texas Government Code section 81.051.
  44. "The NBA Perspective". National Bar Association. Archived from the original on April 26, 2012.
  45. "Southern District of Florida - United States District Court".
  46. "Instructions for Admission to the Bar" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States.
  47. "Rule 46. Attorneys" (PDF). Rules of Practice. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. June 1, 2011. pp. 86–87. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 15, 2013. Retrieved September 19, 2011.
  48. "Survey of Admission Rules in Federal District Courts" (PDF). U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. 2015. Retrieved October 16, 2017.
  49. "Local Rule 83.3 Admission to the Bar" (PDF). Local Civil and Criminal Rules. United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. December 1, 2009. pp. 35–36. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 28, 2011. Retrieved December 23, 2009. See specifically Rules 83.3(b) and (c).
  50. 1 2 "Rule 83.5 Admission of Attorneys to Practice in the Northern District of Ohio". Local Civil Rules. United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. August 31, 2009. Archived from the original on September 16, 2011. Retrieved October 4, 2011. See specifically Rule 83.5(b).
  51. 1 2 "Rule 57.5 Admission of Attorneys to Practice in the Northern District of Ohio". Local Criminal Rules. United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. August 31, 2009. Archived from the original on September 18, 2011. Retrieved October 4, 2011. See specifically Rule 57.5(b).
  53. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on February 2, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2017.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  54. USPTO General Requirements Bulletin for Admission Archived December 4, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  55. Rule of Court Martial 502(d)(3); United States Joint Service Commission on Military Justice (January 16, 2008). Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM), United States (PDF) (2008 ed.). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 5, 2011. Retrieved December 1, 2011.