April 26 Editorial | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional Chinese | 四二六社論 | ||||||
Simplified Chinese | 四·二六社论 | ||||||
Hanyu Pinyin | Sì'èrliù Shèlùn | ||||||
| |||||||
Official name | |||||||
Traditional Chinese | 必須旗幟鮮明地反對動亂 | ||||||
Simplified Chinese | 必须旗帜鲜明地反对动乱 | ||||||
Hanyu Pinyin | BìxǖQízhìXiānmíngde Fǎndùi Dòngluàn | ||||||
Literal meaning | We Must Take a Clear-cut Stand against Disturbances | ||||||
|
The April 26 Editorial was a front-page article published in People's Daily on April 26,1989,during the Tiananmen Square protests. The editorial effectively defined the student movement as a destabilizing anti-party revolt that should be resolutely opposed at all levels of society. As the first authoritative document from the top leadership on the growing movement,it was widely interpreted as having communicated the party's zero-tolerance position to student protesters and their sympathizers.
The contents of the editorial were derived from a meeting of the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC) during the 13th Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) at the residence of Deng Xiaoping on the morning of April 25. During the meeting,the PSC came to the general agreement that the students aimed to overthrow Communist rule and were being heavily influenced by similar anti-Communist movements in Eastern Europe. [1] [2] [3] As such,it threatened the survival of the existing senior leadership,the CCP,and the political system itself. Deputy chief of propaganda Zeng Jianhui wrote the draft,while Hu Qili and Li Peng served as editors. On the evening of April 25,the finished editorial could be heard on national radio and television news stations. [4]
The editorial enraged the student protesters,widened the chasm between the students and the CCP leadership,and emerged as a sore point of contention for the rest of the movement. Students protested in large numbers on April 27,and thereafter continuously asked for the editorial to be retracted. Within the party leadership,Zhao Ziyang advocated for the editorial to be "toned down" or rescinded,but faced significant opposition and was unsuccessful.
Titled "We Must Take a Clear-cut Stand against Disturbances",the editorial begins by addressing the entire population of China,acknowledging their diverse expressions of grief. [5] Specifically referencing the need to "turn grief into strength",the editorial suggests that the poignancy of Hu Yaobang's death reaffirms the significance of upholding the four modernizations. [5] Carried out by "an extremely small number of people",subversive responses,which the editorial describes as mostly verbal denunciations of the CCP,are an example of "abnormal phenomena" to be dealt with swiftly. [5]
Focusing in on the students,the editorial references their assembly at Tiananmen Square on April 22 in an effort to participate in Hu's official memorial. The CCP,acknowledging that the state of mourning creates "emotionally agitated" students,demonstrated "tolerance and restraint" [5] towards this gathering,and the memorial was allowed to proceed without difficulty. The fundamental problem,according to the editorial,is that "an extremely small number of people with ulterior purposes" have taken advantage of students,teachers,and even workers,to promote a "reactionary" message against Party leadership. [5] The editorial describes this small group of people as not grieving,but executing a "planned conspiracy" to "plunge the whole country into chaos and sabotage",in order to "negate the leadership of the CPC and the socialist system". [5] This accusation declares actions like the spreading of rumours,the use of posters,and the forming of unions,as completely detrimental to the future of the nation. [5] To put this in perspective,the editorial suggests that "reactionary" behaviour could potentially reverse the economic progress made by Deng Xiaoping’s program of reform and opening up. According to the editorial,this jeopardizes existing initiatives to control prices,eliminate corruption,and take on political reform. [5]
The editorial therefore calls on the population to help stabilize the political status quo by refusing to take part in any disturbances. Illegal unions,rumour mongering,and "unlawful parades and demonstrations" are presented as not only violations against the state,but also against a student's right to study. [5] The editorial ends by alluding to a general agreement among students and the Party to eliminate corruption and promote democracy,emphasizing the need to end disturbances for China to move forward.
In mid-May 1989,author Wang Ruowang published a rebuttal,arguing vehemently against the editorial. Wang calls the accusation toward “people with ulterior motives”conveniently ambiguous since it allows the Party to target virtually anyone for persecution. [6] He also claims that the editorial lacks evidence when referring to incidents like the shouting of “reactionary”slogans. Still,Wang argues,it deliberately mentions these incidents to provide a pretext for the Party to suppress demonstrators. [7] While he sees the editorial as an attempt to reaffirm the authority of the Party,he argues that it has actually been counterproductive on this point. Wang suggests that by threatening the students,the editorial itself provokes tension,effectively heightening the disturbances it had hoped to curb. [8]
Throughout the Tiananmen Square protests,the editorial remained a major point of contention,as Party members argued about its message and students called for its retraction. General Secretary Zhao Ziyang,recognizing the editorial’s negative consequences,repeatedly made the suggestion among his colleagues to revise it. First,in a private conversation with Premier Li Peng,Zhao explained that though he himself supported the editorial,it had become “a real sore point”with students,creating an “us-versus-them mentality”that could be eased with a simple tweaking of the editorial’s tone. [9] Li,on the other hand,argued that the editorial could not be altered,first because it was completely accurate,but also because it was a manifestation of Deng Xiaoping’s views,which could not be questioned. [10] As the movement progressed into a hunger strike,Zhao again pushed to revise the editorial,with the belief that settling the sensitive topic would effectively ease tension. [11] Following his resignation,Zhao made one last gesture urging Deng to “change the official view of the student movement”from the editorial’s perspective, [12] but by this point,he had been discredited within the Party and his proposal was rejected. [13]
Around this same time in mid-May,an attempt to end the hunger strike with dialogue further displayed the editorial’s resonance. Speaking to Li Peng,student leader Wu'erkaixi identified the description of the movement as “turmoil”as a major issue concerning the hunger strikers. [14] He presented as a solution the publishing of a new,apologetic People’s Daily editorial,“repudiating the one published on April 26”. [14] In response,Li denied ever labeling the movement as turmoil,and no apologetic editorial was published. [15]
Li Peng was a Chinese politician who served as the fourth Premier of the People's Republic of China from 1987 to 1998,and as the Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress,China's top legislative body,from 1998 to 2003. For much of the 1990s Li was ranked second in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hierarchy behind then Party General Secretary Jiang Zemin. He retained his seat on the CCP Politburo Standing Committee until his retirement in 2002.
The Tiananmen Square protests,known in Chinese as the June Fourth Incident were student-led demonstrations held in Tiananmen Square,Beijing,during 1989. In what is known as the Tiananmen Square Massacre,or in Chinese the June Fourth Clearing or June Fourth Massacre,Chinese government troops violently suppressed the demonstrators and those trying to block the military's advance into Tiananmen Square. The protests started on 15 April and were forcibly suppressed on 4 June when the government sent the People's Liberation Army to occupy parts of central Beijing. Estimates of the death toll vary from several hundred to several thousand,with thousands more wounded. The popular national movement inspired by the Beijing protests is sometimes called the '89 Democracy Movement or the Tiananmen Square Incident.
Hu Yaobang was a high-ranking official of the People's Republic of China. He held the top office of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from 1981 to 1987,first as Chairman from 1981 to 1982,then as General Secretary from 1982 to 1987. Hu joined the CCP in the 1930s,and rose to prominence as a comrade of Deng Xiaoping. During the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976),Hu was purged,recalled,and purged again by Mao Zedong. His tomb is in Gongqingcheng,a county-level city under the jurisdiction of Jiujiang.
The Politburo Standing Committee (PSC),officially the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China,is a committee consisting of the top leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Historically it has been composed of five to eleven members,and currently has seven members. Its officially mandated purpose is to conduct policy discussions and make decisions on major issues when the Politburo,a larger decision-making body,is not in session. According to the party's constitution,the General Secretary of the Central Committee must also be a member of the Politburo Standing Committee.
Zhao Ziyang was a Chinese politician. He was the third premier of the People's Republic of China from 1980 to 1987,vice chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from 1981 to 1982,and CCP general secretary from 1987 to 1989. He was in charge of the political reforms in China from 1986,but lost power in connection with the reformative neoauthoritarianism current and his support of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.
Yang Shangkun was a Chinese Communist military and political leader,president of the People's Republic of China from 1988 to 1993,and one of the Eight Elders that dominated the party after the death of Mao Zedong.
Generations of Chinese leadership is a term historians use to characterize distinct periods of the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and,by extension,successive changes in the ideology of the CCP. Historians have studied various periods in the development of the government of the People's Republic of China by reference to these "generations".
Wan Li was a Chinese Communist revolutionary and politician. During a long administrative career in the People's Republic of China,he served successively as Vice Premier,Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC),and a member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Secretariat and its Politburo.Wan joined the Chinese Communist Party in 1936 and led revolutionary and wartime resistance activities in his native Shandong province. After the founding of the communist state in 1949,Wan served in a series of government ministries,then worked as a member of the municipal leadership in Beijing. He was purged during the Cultural Revolution,but was eventually rehabilitated and returned to work as party chief of Anhui province,where he led the implementation of successful agrarian reforms centered on the household-responsibility system. In the 1980s,Wan became one of the leading moderate reformers in China's top leadership,advocating for constitutional reforms,the strengthening of legislative institutions,and the abolition of 'lifelong-terms' of top political leaders. He was named head of the national legislature in 1988. He retired in 1993.
Hu Qili is a former high-ranking politician of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). He was the First Secretary of the CCP Secretariat from 1985 to 1989 and a member of the CCP Politburo Standing Committee from 1987 to 1989. In 1989,he was purged because of his sympathy toward the students of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and his support for General Secretary Zhao Ziyang. However,he was able to get back into politics in 1991. In 2001,he was named chairman of the Soong Ching-ling Foundation.
Wang Ruowang was a Chinese author and dissident who was imprisoned various times for political reasons by both the Kuomintang and the Communist government of China for advocating reform and liberalization. His name at birth was "Shouhua",but he was most commonly known by his pen name,"Ruowang". He was a prolific essayist and literary critic.
Chen Xitong was a member of the Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party and the Mayor of Beijing until he was removed from office on charges of corruption in 1995.
The 12th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party was in session from September 1982 to November 1987. It held seven plenary sessions. It was securely succeeded by the 13th Central Committee.
Yao Yilin was a Vice Premier of the People's Republic of China from 1979 to 1988,and the country's First Vice Premier from 1988 to 1993.
The Beijing Students' Autonomous Federation was a self-governing student organization,representing multiple Beijing universities,and acting as the student protesters' principal decision-making body during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests. Student protesters founded the Federation in opposition to the official,government-supported student organizations,which they believed were undemocratic. Although the Federation made several demands of the government during the protests and organized multiple demonstrations in the Square,its primary focus was to obtain government recognition as a legitimate organization. By seeking this recognition,the Federation directly challenged the Chinese Communist Party's authority. After failing to achieve direct dialogue with the government,the Federation lost support from student protesters,and its central leadership role within the Tiananmen Square protests.
Deng Liqun was a Chinese politician and theorist who was one of the leading figures of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) during the 1980s,most well known for his involvement with the party's propaganda work. Deng was born in Guidong County,Hunan province,and joined the CCP in 1936. He came from an intellectual family and joined the party out of intellectual commitment. He was often referred to as "Little Deng",to be distinguished from Deng Xiaoping,the "Old Deng".
The People's Daily is the official newspaper of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party,providing direct information on the policies and positions of the government to its readers. During the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre,People's Daily played an important role in changing the course of events,especially its April 26 Editorial that provoked great tension between the government and the students when the movement was slowly abating after Hu Yaobang's memorial on April 25. As an official newspaper,its attitude toward the government and the student protestors changed multiple times as the newspaper leadership team had to balance between reporting the truth and staying in line with its higher authority,the Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party,according to the then deputy chief editor,Lu Chaoqi.
Student demonstrations took place in a number of Chinese cities from December 1986 until mid-January 1987. The demonstrations started in the city of Hefei before spreading to other cities such as Shanghai and Nanjing. The movement was heavily influenced by the Chinese intellectuals Fang Lizhi and Wang Ruowang,who were critical of the Chinese government's lack of political reforms. The demonstrations quickly dissipated by mid-January before achieving any of its stated goals. The lack of response from Hu Yaobang,who was the General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) at the time,would result in his removal from power on January 15,1987,and his replacement by Zhao Ziyang.
The protests that occurred throughout the People's Republic of China in the early to middle months of 1989 mainly started out as memorials for former General Secretary Hu Yaobang. The political fall of Hu came immediately following the 1986 Chinese Student Demonstrations when he was removed by paramount leader Deng Xiaoping for being too liberal in his policies. Upon Hu's death on April 15,1989,large gatherings of people began forming across the country. Most media attention was put onto the Beijing citizens who participated in the Tiananmen Square Protests,however,every other region in China had cities with similar demonstrations. The origins of these movements gradually became forgotten in some places and some regions began to demonstrate based on their own problems with their Provincial and Central Governments.
The 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre were a turning point for many Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials,who were subjected to a purge that started after June 4,1989. The purge covered top-level government figures down to local officials,and included CCP General Secretary Zhao Ziyang and his associates. The purge took the form of a massive ideological campaign that lasted 18 months. At least 4 million Communist Party members were under some sort of investigation. The government stated that the purge was undertaken for the purpose of “resolutely getting rid of hostile elements,antiparty elements,and corrupt elements" as well as "dealing strictly with those inside the party serious tendencies toward bourgeois liberalization”and purify the party.
The four-day Sino-Soviet Summit was held in Beijing from 15-18 May 1989. This would be the first formal meeting between a Soviet Communist leader and a Chinese Communist leader since the Sino-Soviet split in the 1950s. The last Soviet leader to visit China was Nikita Khrushchev in September 1959. Both Deng Xiaoping,the paramount leader of China,and Mikhail Gorbachev,General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union,proclaimed that the summit was the beginning of normalized state-to-state relations. The meeting between Mikhail Gorbachev and then General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP),Zhao Ziyang,was hailed as the "natural restoration" of party-to-party relations.