Bat flight

Last updated
A bat wing, which is a highly modified forelimb Bat-wing underside.jpg
A bat wing, which is a highly modified forelimb

Bats are the only mammal capable of true flight. Bats use flight for capturing prey, breeding, avoiding predators, and long-distance migration. Bat wing morphology is often highly specialized to the needs of the species.

Contents

This image is displaying the anatomical makeup of a specific bat wing. Specifically demonstrating the tibia, uropatagium, keel, calcar, tail, and hind foot (being held in between the fingers). Bat calcar.jpg
This image is displaying the anatomical makeup of a specific bat wing. Specifically demonstrating the tibia, uropatagium, keel, calcar, tail, and hind foot (being held in between the fingers).

Evolution

Charles Darwin foresaw an issue with his theory of evolution by natural selection in the evolution of complex traits such as eyes or "the structure and habits of a bat." [1] Indeed, the oldest bat fossils are very similar in wing morphology to the bats of today, despite living and dying 52.5 million years ago. [2] Onychonycteris finneyi, the earliest known bat, already possessed powered flight. [3] O. finneyi likely had an undulating flight style that alternated periods of fluttering with gliding. Evidence for this lies in the broad and short nature of O. finneyi wing morphology, which would have made it difficult to efficiently maneuver in the air or sustain flight. [4] Additionally claws were seen on the ends of their forelimb digits (which have since disappeared in modern-day bats) giving evidence that O. finneyi was a skilled climber. [5] The common ancestor of all bats is hypothesized to have been an arboreal quadruped of the northern hemisphere. [6] This ancestor is predicted to have lived 64 million years ago at the border of the Cretaceous and Paleogene, based on molecular and paleontological data. [7] There is a gap in the fossil record, and no transitional fossils exist from this quadrupedal ancestor to the appearance of the modern bat. It is unclear how long the transition from quadrupedalism to powered flight took. Based on a phylogenetic analysis of wing aerodynamics, the ancestral Chiropteran had wings with a low aspect ratio and rounded wingtips; this indicates it had slow but maneuverable and agile flight. [8] After evolving powered flight, bats underwent massive adaptive radiation, becoming the second-most speciose mammal order, after rodents. [9]

A 2011 study hypothesized that, rather than having evolved from gliders, the ancestors of bats were flutterers, although the researchers did not find any actual evidence for this theory. [10] A 2020 study proposed that flight in bats might have originated independently at least three times, in the groups Yangochiroptera, Pteropodidae and Rhinolophoidea. [11] A response paper rejected this hypothesis based on paleontological and developmental data. Stem-bats such as Onychonycteris and Icaronycteris were already capable of flying and the latter was a laryngeal echolocator. Contrary to the hypothesis of multiple flight origins, which assumes a bat ancestor with only handwings and no plagiopatagia, embryonic development shows the plagiopatagium appearing before the dactyloptagium. A model was used to test the viability of a handwings-only glider and found it ineffective as an actual gliding animal. [12]

A) Bat wing B) Bat hind foot C) Fore foot or wings of Archaeopteryx D) Fore foot or wing bones of domestic fowl. 1= Humerus, 2= Radius, 3= Ulna, 4= Carpals, 4/5= Carpometacarpus, 5= Metacarpals, 6= Phalanges, 7= Femur, 8= Tibia, 9= Fibula, 10= Tarsals, 11= Metatarsals, 12= Phalanges PSM V52 D542 Evolution of limbs into wings.png
A) Bat wing B) Bat hind foot C) Fore foot or wings of Archaeopteryx D) Fore foot or wing bones of domestic fowl. 1= Humerus, 2= Radius, 3= Ulna, 4= Carpals, 4/5= Carpometacarpus, 5= Metacarpals, 6= Phalanges, 7= Femur, 8= Tibia, 9= Fibula, 10= Tarsals, 11= Metatarsals, 12= Phalanges

The expansion of the long bones in bat wings is at least partly attributed to paired-box (Pax) homeodomain transcription factor, PRX1. It is believed that changes in the PRX1 enhancer along with other molecular factors lead to the morphological separation of bats from their ancestors. [13] Up-regulation of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway is also crucial in developmental and evolutionary elongation of bat forelimb digits. [14] FGF10 signaling is also likely required for the development of bat wing membrane and muscles. [15]

To make powered flight possible, bats had to evolve several features. Bat flight necessitated the increase of membrane surface area between the digits of the forelimbs, between the forelimbs and hindlimbs, and between the hindlimbs. [7] Bats also had to evolve a thinner cortical bone to reduce torsional stresses produced by propulsive downstroke movements. [16] Bats had to reroute innervation to their wing muscles to allow for control of powered flight. [17] The strength and mass of forelimb musculature also had to be increased to allow powerful upstrokes and downstrokes. [18] To provide sufficient oxygen supply to its body, bats also had to make several metabolic adaptations to provide for the increased energy cost of flight including high metabolic rate, increased lung capacity, and aerobic respiration. [19]

Bats are the only mammals specialized for flight for a few reasons. They have specialized forelimbs, membranes, large pectoral muscles and large back muscles used for powering their wingbeats in flight. [20] Both of these muscle groups are similar in appearance among vertebrates. However bats have a unique muscle group known as the occipito-pollicalis. A necessary muscle group for mammalian flight. [15] These muscle groups act to power flight and utilize the plagiopatagium which is the skin overlapping the forelimb, similar to the skin on species of flying squirrels. [21] The skin located on the bat wing is called the patagium. Which is composed of elastin fibers along with connective tissue. [22] Furthermore, providing durability and flexibility for the bat to lift itself easily. [23]

The labeled muscle groups of a bat. Abbreviations are as follows; ATR: acromiotrapezius, AD: acromiodeltoideus, TB: Triceps brachii, OP: occipito-pollicalis, LD: latissimus dorsi. Follow Bat Image Final.png
The labeled muscle groups of a bat. Abbreviations are as follows; ATR: acromiotrapezius, AD: acromiodeltoideus, TB: Triceps brachii, OP: occipito-pollicalis, LD: latissimus dorsi. Follow

Wing shape

Wing chord

The chord length of a bat wing is the distance from the leading edge to the trailing edge measured parallel to the direction of flight. The mean chord length is a standardized measure which captures a representative chord length over a whole flap cycle. Given wing area S, and wingspan b, the mean chord can be calculated by, [24] [25]

Aspect ratio

Aspect ratio has been calculated with different definitions. The two methods outlined here give different, non-comparable values. The first method of calculation uses the wingspan b, and the wing area S, and is given by, [26] [27] [28] [29]

Using this definition, typical values of aspect ratio fall between 5 and 11 depending on the wing morphology of a given species. [27] Faster flight speed is significantly correlated with higher aspect ratios. [30] Higher aspect ratios decrease the energetic costs of flight, which is beneficial to migratory species. [27]

Another way to calculate the wing aspect ratio is by taking the length of the wrist to the tip of the third finger, adding the length of the forearm, and then dividing that total by the distance from the wrist to the fifth finger. [31]

Wing loading

Wing loading is the weight of the bat divided by the wing area and is expressed using the unit N/m2 (newtons per square metre). [27] Given a bat of mass m, the wing loading Q is,

For bats, wing loading values typically range from 4 to 35 N/m2 depending on the bat species. [27] Mass loading differs only by a constant g , and is expressed in kg/m2.

In a meta analysis covering 257 species of bats, higher relative wing loading values were observed in bats which fly at higher velocities, while lower wing loading values were correlated with improved flight maneuverability. [27] Additionally, bats with lower wing loading were seen to have better mass-carrying ability, and were able carry larger prey while flying. [27]

Wingtips

Bats with larger wingtips have slower flight speeds. [27] Wings with rounded tips have lower aspect ratios, and are associated with slower, more maneuverable flight. [27]

Wing morphology as it relates to ecology

Fast hawking

Bats that consume insects by hawking (aerial pursuit and capture) must be able to travel at fast speeds, and must employ a high level of maneuverability. [27] Morphological adaptations that favor this style of flight include high wing loading, long and pointed wingtips, and wings with high aspect ratios. [27] The bat family Molossidae is considered highly specialized at hawking, with unusually high aspect ratios and wing loading. [27] These traits make them capable of incredibly fast speeds. Mexican free-tailed bats are thought to be the fastest mammal on earth, capable of horizontal flight speeds over a level surface up to 160 km/h (100 mph). [32]

Gleaning

Bats that glean insects capture stationary prey on a solid substrate. This foraging method requires bats to hover above the substrate and listen for insect noises. [33] Short, rounded wingtips in gleaning bats may be advantageous to allow maneuverability of flight in cluttered airspace. [27] Pointed wingtips may be detrimental to a bat's ability to glean insects. [34]

Trawling

Bats with this foraging style pluck insects off the surface of a body of water. Piscivores employ the same flight style to catch fish just below the water's surface. [27] Trawling bats travel at slower speeds, which means that they require low wing loading. [27]

Frugivory

Frugivores have below-average aspect ratios. [27] Fruit-eating bats have variable wing-loading, which corresponds to vertical stratification of rain forests. [35] Fruit-eating bats that travel below the canopy have higher wing-loading; bats that travel above the canopy have intermediate wing-loading; bats that travel in the understory have low wing-loading. [35] This pattern of decreasing wing-loading as airspace becomes more cluttered is consistent with data that suggest that lower wing-loading is associated with greater maneuverability. [27]

Nectarivory

Nectarivores, like gleaners, will frequently employ hovering during foraging. Hovering nectarivores are more likely to have rounded wingtips, which aids in maneuverability. [27] Nectarivores that land on the flower before feeding have worse maneuverability. [27] Nectarivores in general have lower aspect ratios, which makes them more suited to flight in a cluttered environment. [27] Nectarivores that migrate to seasonal food resources, such as the genus Leptonycteris , have lower wing-loading than nectarivorous species with small home ranges. [27]

Carnivory

Bats that consume non-insect animal prey are benefited by low wing-loading, which allows them to lift and carry larger prey items. [27] This increased capacity for lift even allows them to take flight from the ground while carrying a prey item that is half of their body weight. [27]

Sanguinivory

The three species of sanguinivorous bats belong to the subfamily Desmodontinae. These bats are characterized by relatively high wing-loading and short or average wingspans. [27] The high wing-loading allows them faster flight speeds, which is advantageous when they have to commute long distances from their roosts to find prey. [27] The common vampire bat has an average aspect ratio and very short, slightly rounded wingtips. [27] The hairy-legged vampire bat has the lowest aspect ratio of the three species; it also has relatively long and rounded wingtips. [27] Hairy-legged vampire bats are more adapted to maneuverable flights than the other two species. [27] The white-winged vampire bat has the highest aspect ratio of the three species, which means it is most adapted to long flights. [27]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal echolocation</span> Method used by several animal species to determine location using sound

Echolocation, also called bio sonar, is a biological sonar used by several animal groups, both in the air and underwater. Echolocating animals emit calls and listen to the echoes of those calls that return from various objects near them. They use these echoes to locate and identify the objects. Echolocation is used for navigation, foraging, and hunting prey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microbat</span> Suborder of mammals

Microbats constitute the suborder Microchiroptera within the order Chiroptera (bats). Bats have long been differentiated into Megachiroptera (megabats) and Microchiroptera, based on their size, the use of echolocation by the Microchiroptera and other features; molecular evidence suggests a somewhat different subdivision, as the microbats have been shown to be a paraphyletic group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Megabat</span> Family of fruit bats

Megabats constitute the family Pteropodidae of the order Chiroptera (bats). They are also called fruit bats, Old World fruit bats, or—especially the genera Acerodon and Pteropus—flying foxes. They are the only member of the superfamily Pteropodoidea, which is one of two superfamilies in the suborder Yinpterochiroptera. Internal divisions of Pteropodidae have varied since subfamilies were first proposed in 1917. From three subfamilies in the 1917 classification, six are now recognized, along with various tribes. As of 2018, 197 species of megabat had been described.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vespertilionidae</span> Family of microbats

Vespertilionidae is a family of microbats, of the order Chiroptera, flying, insect-eating mammals variously described as the common, vesper, or simple nosed bats. The vespertilionid family is the most diverse and widely distributed of bat families, specialised in many forms to occupy a range of habitats and ecological circumstances, and it is frequently observed or the subject of research. The facial features of the species are often simple, as they mainly rely on vocally emitted echolocation. The tails of the species are enclosed by the lower flight membranes between the legs. Over 300 species are distributed all over the world, on every continent except Antarctica. It owes its name to the genus Vespertilio, which takes its name from a word for bat, vespertilio, derived from the Latin term vesper meaning 'evening'; they are termed "evening bats" and were once referred to as "evening birds".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horseshoe bat</span> Family of mammals

Horseshoe bats are bats in the family Rhinolophidae. In addition to the single living genus, Rhinolophus, which has about 106 species, the extinct genus Palaeonycteris has been recognized. Horseshoe bats are closely related to the Old World leaf-nosed bats, family Hipposideridae, which have sometimes been included in Rhinolophidae. The horseshoe bats are divided into six subgenera and many species groups. The most recent common ancestor of all horseshoe bats lived 34–40 million years ago, though it is unclear where the geographic roots of the family are, and attempts to determine its biogeography have been indecisive. Their taxonomy is complex, as genetic evidence shows the likely existence of many cryptic species, as well as species recognized as distinct that may have little genetic divergence from previously recognized taxa. They are found in the Old World, mostly in tropical or subtropical areas, including Africa, Asia, Europe, and Oceania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leaf-nosed bat</span> Family of bats

The New World leaf-nosed bats (Phyllostomidae) are bats found from southern North America to South America, specifically from the Southwest United States to northern Argentina. They are ecologically the most varied and diverse family within the order Chiroptera. Most species are insectivorous, but the phyllostomid bats include within their number true predatory species and frugivores. For example, the spectral bat, the largest bat in the Americas, eats vertebrate prey, including small, dove-sized birds. Members of this family have evolved to use food groups such as fruit, nectar, pollen, insects, frogs, other bats, and small vertebrates, and in the case of the vampire bats, even blood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spectral bat</span> Species of bat

The spectral bat, also called the great false vampire bat, great spectral bat, American false vampire bat or Linnaeus's false vampire bat, is a large, carnivorous leaf-nosed bat found in Mexico, Central America, and South America. It is the only member of the genus Vampyrum; its closest living relative is the big-eared woolly bat. It is the largest bat species in the New World, as well as the largest carnivorous bat: its wingspan is 0.7–1.0 m (2.3–3.3 ft). It has a robust skull and teeth, with which it delivers a powerful bite to kill its prey. Birds are frequent prey items, though it may also consume rodents, insects, and other bats.

<i>Palaeochiropteryx</i> Extinct genus of bats

Palaeochiropteryx is an extinct genus of bat from the Middle Eocene of Europe and North America. It contains three very similar species – Palaeochiropteryx tupaiodon and Palaeochiropteryx spiegeli, both from the famous Messel Pit of Germany, as well as Palaeochiropteryx sambuceus from the Sheep Pass Formation. They are usually found complete and exceptionally preserved, even retaining the outlines of their fur, ears, and wing membranes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dwarf dog-faced bat</span> Species of bat

The dwarf dog-faced bat is a species of free-tailed bat from South America. It is found in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Paraguay and Uruguay, typically at lower elevations. It is one of two species in the genus Molossops, the other being the rufous dog-faced bat. Three subspecies are often recognized, though mammalogist Judith Eger considers it monotypic with no subspecies. It is a small free-tailed bat, with a forearm length of 28.9–32.5 mm (1.14–1.28 in) and a weight of 5–8 g (0.18–0.28 oz); males are larger than females. It is brown, with paler belly fur and darker back fur. Its wings are unusual for a free-tailed bat, with exceptionally broad wingtips. Additionally, it has low wing loading, meaning that it has a large wing surface area relative to its body weight. Therefore, it flies more similarly to a vesper bat than to other species in its own family. As it forages at night for its insect prey, including moths, beetles, and others, it uses two kinds of frequency-modulated echolocation calls: one type is to navigate in open areas and to search for prey, while the other type is used for navigating in cluttered areas or while approaching a prey item.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Large slit-faced bat</span> Species of bat

The large slit-faced bat is a species of slit-faced bat with a broad distribution in forest and savanna habitats in West, Central, and East Africa. N. marica, is the available name for the southern savanna species if it is recognized as distinct from this species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Desert long-eared bat</span> Species of bat

The desert long-eared bat is a species of vesper bat found in North Africa and the Middle East.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Western small-footed bat</span> Species of bat

The western small-footed bat, also known as the western small-footed myotis, is a species of vesper bat native to North America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Golden-tipped bat</span> Species of bat

The golden-tipped bat is a species of Microchiropteran in the family Vespertilionidae. It is found in Papua New Guinea and in Australia, especially scattered along the eastern part of Australia. The species is considered uncommon, and is listed as endangered in Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Little free-tailed bat</span> Species of bat

The little free-tailed bat is a species of the genus Chaerephon in the family Molossidae. It is widely distributed across Africa and islands around the continent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cape horseshoe bat</span> Species of bat

The Cape horseshoe bat is a species of bat in the family Rhinolophidae. It is endemic to South Africa, and is potentially threatened by habitat loss and disturbance of its roosting sites, although it is present in large enough numbers to be considered of least concern by the IUCN.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swinny's horseshoe bat</span> Species of bat

Swinny's horseshoe bat is a species of bat in the family Rhinolophidae. In English, R. swinnyi is commonly referred to as Swinny's horseshoe bat. In Afrikaans, it is commonly referred to as Swinny se saalneusvlermuis. This species belongs to the African clade. R. swinnyi was discovered by an African collector H. H. Swinny. They have been recorded in Angola, Republic of the Congo, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Malawi.

<i>Histiotus</i> Genus of bats

Histiotus is a genus of South American vesper bats with species that include:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yangochiroptera</span> Suborder of bats

Yangochiroptera, or Vespertilioniformes, is a suborder of Chiroptera that includes most of the microbat families, except the Rhinopomatidae, Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae, and Megadermatidae. These other families, plus the megabats, are seen as part of another suborder, the Yinpterochiroptera. All bats in Yangochiroptera use laryngeal echolocation(LE), which involves the use of high-frequency sounds to detect prey and avoid obstacles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bat</span> Order of flying mammals

Bats are flying mammals of the order Chiroptera. With their forelimbs adapted as wings, they are the only mammals capable of true and sustained flight. Bats are more agile in flight than most birds, flying with their very long spread-out digits covered with a thin membrane or patagium. The smallest bat, and arguably the smallest extant mammal, is Kitti's hog-nosed bat, which is 29–34 millimetres in length, 150 mm (6 in) across the wings and 2–2.6 g in mass. The largest bats are the flying foxes, with the giant golden-crowned flying fox reaching a weight of 1.6 kg and having a wingspan of 1.7 m.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palaeochiropterygidae</span> Extinct family of bats

Palaeochiropterygidae is a family of extinct bats. It was originally erected by the Swiss naturalist Pierre Revilliod in 1917 after discoveries of Palaeochiropteryx fossils from the Messel Pit of Germany. Palaeochiropterygidae was merged into Archaeonycteridae by Kurten and Anderson in 1980, but modern authorities specializing in bat fossils maintain the distinction between the two. It was classified to the unranked clade Microchiropteramorpha by Smith et al. in 2007.

References

  1. Darwin, C. (1968). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. 1859. London: Murray Google Scholar.
  2. Sears, K. E., Behringer, R. R., Rasweiler, J. J., & Niswander, L. A. (2006). Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(17), 6581-6586.
  3. Simmons, Nancy B.; Seymour, Kevin L.; Habersetzer, Jörg; Gunnell, Gregg F. (February 2008). "Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation". Nature. 451 (7180): 818–821. Bibcode:2008Natur.451..818S. doi:10.1038/nature06549. hdl: 2027.42/62816 . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   18270539. S2CID   4356708.
  4. Simmons, N. B., K. L. Seymour, J. Habersetzer, and G. F. Gunnell. 2008. Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation. Nature 451:818–821.
  5. Anderson, S. C., and G. D. Ruxton. 2020. The evolution of flight in bats: a novel hypothesis. Mammal Review 50:426–439.
  6. Teeling, E. C., Springer, M. S., Madsen, O., Bates, P., O'brien, S. J., & Murphy, W. J. (2005). A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science, 307(5709), 580-584.
  7. 1 2 Cooper, K. L., & Tabin, C. J. (2008). Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight. Genes & development, 22(2), 121-124.
  8. Amador, Lucila I.; Almeida, Francisca C.; Giannini, Norberto P. (September 2020). "Evolution of Traditional Aerodynamic Variables in Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) within a Comprehensive Phylogenetic Framework". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 27 (3): 549–561. doi:10.1007/s10914-019-09475-8. ISSN   1064-7554. S2CID   195873422.
  9. Nowak, R. M. (1994). Walker's bats of the world. JHU Press.
  10. Kaplan, Matt (2011). "Ancient bats got in a flap over food". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2011.9304. S2CID   84015350.
  11. Anderson, Sophia C.; Ruxton, Graeme D. (2020). "The evolution of flight in bats: a novel hypothesis". Mammal Review. 50 (4): 426–439. doi: 10.1111/mam.12211 .
  12. Gardner, Nicholas M.; Dececchi, T. Alexander (2022). "Flight and echolocation evolved once in Chiroptera: comments on 'The evolution of flight in bats: a novel hypothesis'". Mammal Review. 52 (2): 284–290. doi:10.1111/mam.12286. ISSN   0305-1838.
  13. Cooper, Kimberly L.; Tabin, Clifford J. (2008-01-15). "Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight". Genes & Development. 22 (2): 121–124. doi:10.1101/gad.1639108. ISSN   0890-9369. PMC   2731632 . PMID   18198331.
  14. Sears, Karen E.; Behringer, Richard R.; Rasweiler, John J.; Niswander, Lee A. (2006-04-25). "Development of bat flight: Morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (17): 6581–6586. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.6581S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   1458926 . PMID   16618938.
  15. 1 2 3 Tokita, Masayoshi; Abe, Takaaki; Suzuki, Kazuo (2012-12-18). "The developmental basis of bat wing muscle". Nature Communications. 3 (1): 1302. Bibcode:2012NatCo...3.1302T. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2298 . ISSN   2041-1723. PMID   23250432.
  16. Swartz, S. M., Bennett, M. B., & Carrier, D. R. (1992). Wing bone stresses in free flying bats and the evolution of skeletal design for flight. Nature, 359(6397), 726.
  17. Thewissen, J. G. M., & Babcock, S. K. (1991). Distinctive cranial and cervical innervation of wing muscles: new evidence for bat monophyly. Science, 251(4996), 934-937.
  18. Thewissen, J. G. M., & Babcock, S. K. (1992). The origin of flight in bats. BioScience, 42(5), 340-345.
  19. Shen, Y.-Y., L. Liang, Z.-H. Zhu, W.-P. Zhou, D. M. Irwin, and Y.-P. Zhang. 2010. Adaptive evolution of energy metabolism genes and the origin of flight in bats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:8666–8671.
  20. Thewissen, J. G. M.; Babcock, S. K. (1992). "The Origin of Flight in Bats". BioScience. 42 (5): 340–345. doi:10.2307/1311780. ISSN   0006-3568. JSTOR   1311780.
  21. Cao, Tianxin; Jin, J.-P. (2020). "Evolution of Flight Muscle Contractility and Energetic Efficiency". Frontiers in Physiology. 11: 1038. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.01038 . ISSN   1664-042X. PMC   7581897 . PMID   33162892.
  22. Cheney, Jorn A.; Konow, Nicolai; Bearnot, Andrew; Swartz, Sharon M. (2015-05-06). "A wrinkle in flight: the role of elastin fibres in the mechanical behaviour of bat wing membranes". Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 12 (106): 20141286. doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.1286. PMC   4424667 . PMID   25833238.
  23. E., Hill, John (1983). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Indo-Australia. British Museum. OCLC   604034924.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. J., Pennycuick, Colin (1989). Bird flight performance : a practical calculation manual. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0198577218. OCLC   468014494.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. Von Busse, R.; Hedenstrom, A.; Winter, Y.; Johansson, L. C. (2012-10-11). "Kinematics and wing shape across flight speed in the bat, Leptonycteris yerbabuenae". Biology Open. 1 (12): 1226–1238. doi:10.1242/bio.20122964. ISSN   2046-6390. PMC   3522884 . PMID   23259057.
  26. Farney, J., & Fleharty, E. D. (1969). Aspect ratio, loading, wing span, and membrane areas of bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 50(2), 362-367.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Norberg and Rayner (1987). Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 316.1179 (1987): 335–42.
  28. Hedenström, A.; Johansson, L. C.; Wolf, M.; Busse, R. von; Winter, Y.; Spedding, G. R. (2007-05-11). "Bat Flight Generates Complex Aerodynamic Tracks". Science. 316 (5826): 894–897. Bibcode:2007Sci...316..894H. doi:10.1126/science.1142281. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   17495171. S2CID   39517931.
  29. Shyy, W.; Aono, H.; Chimakurthi, S.K.; Trizila, P.; Kang, C.-K.; Cesnik, C.E.S.; Liu, H. (2010-10-01). "Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity". Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 46 (7): 284–327. Bibcode:2010PrAeS..46..284S. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.01.001. ISSN   0376-0421.
  30. Findley, J. S., Studier, E. H., & Wilson, D. E. (1972). Morphologic properties of bat wings. Journal of Mammalogy, 53(3), 429-444.
  31. Freeman, P. W. (1981). A multivariate study of the family Molossidae (Mammalia, Chiroptera): morphology, ecology, evolution. Mammalogy papers: University of Nebraska State Museum, 26.
  32. McCracken, G. F., Safi, K., Kunz, T. H., Dechmann, D. K., Swartz, S. M., & Wikelski, M. (2016). Airplane tracking documents the fastest flight speeds recorded for bats. Royal Society Open Science, 3(11), 160398.
  33. Schmidt, S., Hanke, S., & Pillat, J. (2000). The role of echolocation in the hunting of terrestrial prey–new evidence for an underestimated strategy in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 186(10), 975-988.
  34. Stoffberg, S., & Jacobs, D. S. (2004). The influence of wing morphology and echolocation on the gleaning ability of the insectivorous bat Myotis tricolor. Canadian journal of zoology, 82(12), 1854-1863.
  35. 1 2 Hodgkison, R., Balding, S. T., Zubaid, A., & Kunz, T. H. (2004). Habitat structure, wing morphology, and the vertical stratification of Malaysian fruit bats (Megachiroptera: Pteropodidae). Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20(06), 667-673.