Bernard H.V.120

Last updated
H.V.120
Bernard H.V.120 02 a.jpg
Role Racing seaplane
National origin France
Manufacturer Société des Avions Bernard
First flight25 March 1930
Number built2

The Bernard H.V.120 was a racing seaplane designed and built by the French aircraft manufacturer Bernard. It was developed specifically to compete in the Schneider Trophy race.

Contents

The company developed it as a wooden single-seat mid-wing cantilever monoplane, equipped with twin floats and powered by a 1,680 hp (1,253 kW) Hispano Suiza 18R W-18 piston engine. Development was protracted, primarily as a result of engine-related difficulties, that delayed availability and thus did not permit the aircraft to race in the 1929 competition as intended. The first aircraft performed its maiden flight on 25 March 1930, four months after the race.

The test flight programme, while successfully demonstrating the ability to fly at 500 kmph (310 mph), was not trouble-free. The second aircraft was lost in a fatal crash during 1931; work continued with the first aircraft. During the early 1930s, the prototype was converted, and thus re-designated Bernard V.4, into a racing landplane; however, this aircraft would never actually fly as a result of funding having been pulled for the project.

Development

The Schneider Trophy competition, held annually throughout much of the interwar period, proved to be attractive to various aircraft manufacturers across Europe. For the 1929 race, it was intended for France to have been represented by two seaplanes, one that was produced by Nieuport while the other by Bernard. [1] Both projects were worked on with a high degree of secrecy and information was often intentionally vague to most external parties. [1] Despite both company's strenuous efforts, neither aircraft were ultimately able to participate at the 1929 event due to the failure of the engine manufacturer to deliver their intended powerplants on time. [1]

On 25 March 1930, the first H.V.120 conducted its maiden flight from Hourtin, roughly four months after the race. [1] Within the next 12 months, it demonstrated its ability to attain speeds as high as 500 kmph (310 mph). [2] Aside from the engine-related problems, development of the aircraft had encountered several technical issues; the weight of the finalised engine was so much that it necessitated the redesigning of both the engine mount and the forward fuselage.[ citation needed ] Several other changes were made, while the first aircraft had a three-bladed propeller, the second was fitted with a four-bladed Chauvière propeller instead. During July 1931, the second aircraft crashed into the water on its first flight, killing the pilot.[ citation needed ]

In 1933, the prototype was converted into a racing landplane, referred to as the Bernard V.4. The V.4 had widely spaced main landing gear with streamlined wheel spats.[ citation needed ] During December 1933, the V.4 was transported to Istres to try to achieve a French Air Ministry prize for a French aircraft to beat the world speed record before January 1934. It was due to make an attempt to fly on 27 December 1933, but strong winds kept the aircraft grounded. Further attempts in February 1934 to fly were thwarted by engine problems and lack of government finance. The project was abandoned without the aircraft having ever flown.[ citation needed ]

Design

The single-piece wing of the aircraft was entirely composed of wood and features laminar-type construction, akin to that that of the Bernard 20 fighter aircraft. [1] Structurally, it used narrow box-girders that roughly corresponded to traditional spar. These girders, which varied in both height and length dependent upon their specific location within the wing, were fitted with plywood flanges and spruce webs that were glued together to produce a longitudinal multicellular structure. [3] This framework of the wing was attached to the formers of both the leading edge and trailing edge as well as the inter-spar ribs. The flanges were planed down to the sought profile, which was relatively thick and biconvex, before being covered with plywood. [4]

The centre section of each girder was enlarged and hollowed out to form the forward portion of the cockpit as well as a portion of the fuselage. The centre of the wing possessed considerable torsional resistance while the wingtips were noticeably more flexible. [4] The entire width of the wing's central section was traversed by four tubes, composed of steel, that terminated in sockets at each end. The wing was attached to the fuselage via the four rear sockets while the four forward sockets connected to the engine bearer. [4] Furthermore, the float gear was attached, via a duralumin frame, to the underside of the wing's central section. The ailerons, which were metal, were operated by torsion. [4]

The aircraft had an oval-section fuselage, the midsection of which was intentionally minimised in terms of its size. [4] Structural elements included a pair of box girders that formed two vertical walls; these were united via several frames of spruce and plywood. These girders comprised of a pair of longerons, complete with spruce uprights and crosspieces, that were assembled by gussets and entirely covered by plywood. Both the top and bottom of the fuselage were also covered with plywood, which was stiffened via a series of longitudinal stringers. [5] A single-piece horizontal empennage was encased into the tip of the fuselage and secured via four bolts; it had a framework of two box spars and ribs and was covered with plywood. The fin, which shared a similar design, was integral with the fuselage. [6]

The floats were mounted in a similar fashion to that of a catamaran; they were connected to the central section of the wing by wooden panels and highly resistant steel tubing. [6] Furthermore, each float was connected with the wing via a pair of wires with elastic attachments that prevented abnormal stresses from being transferred through the wires; such forces could occur during a hard landing or in the event of the wing having suffered deformation. [6] Fuel was housed inside of both floats; in operation, the fuel from the left float would automatically transfer across to the right float, from which the fuel was pumped to the engine. [7]

It was powered by a single Hispano Suiza 18R inline piston engine, capable of producing up to 1,400 hp. [6] Installed within the nose of the aircraft, it was covered by a cowling that fused with the leading edge of the wing. The atypical engine arrangement required a purpose-designed mount, comprising a cradle that was directly attached to the two lower forward sockets of the wing's centre section and supported by a pair of tubes that were attached to the two upper forward sockets of the wing. [8] A compact header tank was present that used air pressure to prevent fuel delivery issues while the aircraft was performing tight turns or high-G manoeuvres, although a prolonged bank could exceed its capabilities. Cooling was primarily achieved via sizable wing-mounted radiators; these covered three quarters of the wing's surface area. [9] A separate radiator on the side of the fuselage was present to cool the oil; just aft of the pilot's position was the oil tank. [2]

Variants

Bernard V-4 photo from L'Aerophile January 1934 Bernard V-4 photo L'Aerophile January 1934.jpg
Bernard V-4 photo from L'Aerophile January 1934
H.V.120-01
Prototype, first flew 25 March 1930 had a direct drive three-bladed propeller.
H.V.120-02
Fatal crash on first flight in July 1931, had a reduction gear to drive a four-bladed propeller
V.4
Prototype H.V.120 re-built as a landplane in 1933 with a 1,125 hp (839 kW) Hispano-Suiza 18Sb engine and shorter span wings, not flown.

Specifications (H.V.120-01)

Bernard H.V.120 02 plan Bernard H.V.120 02 plan.jpg
Bernard H.V.120 02 plan

Data from Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft , [10] National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics [11]

General characteristics

Performance

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latécoère 28</span> Type of aircraft

The Latécoère 28 was a long distance monoplane aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Latécoère.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Farman F.220</span> Type of aircraft

The Farman F.220 and its derivatives were thick-sectioned, high-winged, four engined French monoplanes from Farman Aviation Works. Based on the push-pull configuration proven by the F.211, design started in August 1925 and the first flight of the prototype was on 26 May 1932. The largest bomber to serve in France between the two world wars was the final F.222 variant. One variation was intended to be an airliner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avia BH-21</span> Type of aircraft

The Avia BH-21 was a fighter biplane designed and produced by the Czechoslovakian aircraft manufacturer Avia. First flown in January 1925, it served an important role in securing Czechoslovak national security during the Interwar period.

The Arsenal VB 10 was a French fighter-interceptor aircraft developed during and shortly after World War II. It was a low-wing monoplane with retractable tailwheel undercarriage and of largely orthodox configuration. The ultimate product of a design that began with the Arsenal VG 10 prior to the war, the VB 10 added a second engine behind the cockpit which drove a second propeller, coaxial with and contra-rotating to the propeller driven by the engine in the nose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latécoère 521</span> 1930s French flying boat

The Latécoère 521 was a French six-engined double deck flying boat designed and manufactured by Pierre-Georges Latécoère. At the time of its completion, it held the distinction of being the largest aircraft to be built in France as well as one of the first large passenger aircraft capable of flying trans-Atlantic routes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernard 190</span> 1928 French airliner

The Bernard 190 or Bernard-Hubert 190 was a French airliner of 1928. It was a high-wing cantilever monoplane of conventional configuration, based on the Bernard 18. Compared with its predecessor, it kept the same basic design but featured redesigned tail surfaces, an enlarged cabin, and offered its flight crew a completely enclosed cockpit. Also like its predecessor, the basic airliner model provided the basis for a long-range aircraft to be used in record attempts, the 191GR.

The Dewoitine D.33 was a single-engine low-wing all-metal monoplane aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Dewoitine. It is best remembered for setting a long-distance world record on its maiden flight in 1930.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Farman F.300</span> Type of aircraft

The Farman F.300 and F.310 were trimotor monoplane airliners designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Farman Aviation Works.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wibault 280</span> Type of aircraft

The Wibault 280-T was a monoplane trimotor airliner designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Wibault. Designed to accommodate up to 12 passengers in its largest variant, development of the aircraft was financially backed by the Penhoët shipyards, which led to the aircraft alternatively being referred to as 'Penhoët Wibault'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lioré et Olivier LeO H-190</span> Type of aircraft

The Lioré et Olivier H-190 was a biplane flying boat aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Lioré et Olivier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dewoitine D.513</span> Type of aircraft

The Dewoitine D.513 was a 1930s prototype French monoplane fighter designed and built by Dewoitine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romano R.90</span> Type of aircraft

The Romano R.90 was a prototype single-seat French floatplane fighter of the 1930s. A single example of the R.90 was built, but the type did form the basis of the Romano R.83 and Romano R.92 fighters which were built in secret for the Spanish Republicans during the Spanish Civil War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernard H.V.40</span> Type of aircraft

The Bernard H.V.40 was a racing seaplane designed by Société des Avions Bernard for the French government to compete in the 1929 Schneider Trophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernard H.V.41</span> Type of aircraft

The Bernard H.V.41 was a racing seaplane designed by Société des Avions Bernard for the French government to compete in the 1929 Schneider Trophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernard H.V.42</span> Type of aircraft

The Bernard H.V.42 was a racing seaplane designed by Société des Avions Bernard for the French government for use of the French Schneider Trophy team.

The Stampe et Vertongen RSV.22 was a training biplane produced in Belgium in the 1920s.

The Bernard 80 GR was one of three types built by different French constructors in response to a government call for an aircraft capable of setting new long-distance records. A single engine monoplane with a crew of two, the 80 GR set an absolute record for flight over a closed circuit in April 1931, covering 8,960 km (5,569 mi). Modifications led to a new designation as the Bernard 81 GR but no more records were set despite several attempts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernard H.V.220</span> 1930s French racing seaplane

The Bernard H.V.220 was a 1930s French racing seaplane and the last attempt by Bernard compete in the Schneider Trophy race. Delays caused by engine problems meant the aircraft was abandoned and never flown.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Potez-CAMS 161</span> 1940s French flying boat airliner

The Potez-CAMS 161 was a large, French six-engined flying boat airliner, designed to operate on the North Atlantic routes that were opening up in the late 1930s. Its development was almost halted by World War II. Just one was built and partially tested before its destruction by Allied forces near the war's end.

The Nieuport-Delage NiD 450 was a French racing floatplane, originally intended to compete for the 1929 Schneider Trophy. After the French decided not to participate that year, the type was used as the NiD 650 to speed the development of the proposed entrants to the 1931 event, the NiD 651 and NiD 652. Delays in producing the latters' engines left these unflown.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 NACA 1928, p. 1.
  2. 1 2 NACA 1928, p. 5.
  3. NACA 1928, pp. 1-2.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 NACA 1928, p. 2.
  5. NACA 1928, pp. 2-3.
  6. 1 2 3 4 NACA 1928, p. 3.
  7. NACA 1928, p. 4.
  8. NACA 1928, pp. 3-4.
  9. NACA 1928, pp. 4-5.
  10. Orbis 1985, pp. 653-654.
  11. NACA 1928, p. 6-8.

Bibliography

93R19940.

Further reading