Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret

Last updated

Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret, 1833, 90.8 by 66 cm (35.7 by 26.0 in) Etty Britomart 1833.jpg
Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret, 1833, 90.8 by 66 cm (35.7 by 26.0 in)

Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret is an oil painting on canvas by English artist William Etty, first exhibited in 1833 and now in Tate Britain. Intended to illustrate the virtues of honour and chastity, it depicts a scene from Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene in which the female warrior Britomart slays the evil magician Busirane and frees his captive, the beautiful Amoret. In Spenser's original poem Amoret has been tortured and mutilated by the time of her rescue, but Etty disliked the depiction of violence and portrayed her as unharmed.

Contents

Despite being a depiction of an occult ritual, a violent death, a partly nude woman and strongly implied sexual torture, Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret was uncontroversial on its first exhibition in 1833 and was critically well received. Sold by Etty to a private collector in 1833, it passed through the hands of several more before entering the collection of the Lady Lever Art Gallery. In 1958, it was acquired by the Tate Gallery, and it remains in the collection of Tate Britain.

Background

William Etty was born in 1787 in York, the son of a miller and baker. [1] He showed artistic promise from an early age, [2] but his family were financially insecure, [1] and at the age of 12 he left school to become an apprentice printer in Hull. [3] On completing his seven-year indenture he moved to London "with a few pieces of chalk-crayons in colours", [4] with the aim of emulating the Old Masters and becoming a history painter. [5] Etty gained acceptance to the Royal Academy Schools in early 1807. [6] After a year spent studying under renowned portrait painter Thomas Lawrence, [7] Etty returned to the Royal Academy, drawing at the life class and copying other paintings. [7] [8] In 1821 the Royal Academy exhibited one of Etty's works, The Arrival of Cleopatra in Cilicia (also known as The Triumph of Cleopatra). [9] The painting was extremely well received, and many of Etty's fellow artists greatly admired him. He was elected a full Royal Academician in 1828, ahead of John Constable. [10] He became well respected for his ability to capture flesh tones accurately in painting and for his fascination with contrasts in skin tones. [11]

Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed (1830). By the 1830s Etty had developed a reputation for using scenes from history, mythology and literature as pretexts for painting nude figures. William Etty (1787-1849) - Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed - N00358 - Tate.jpg
Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed (1830). By the 1830s Etty had developed a reputation for using scenes from history, mythology and literature as pretexts for painting nude figures.

Following the exhibition of Cleopatra, Etty attempted to reproduce its success, concentrating on painting further history paintings containing nude figures. [12] He exhibited 15 paintings at the Summer Exhibition in the 1820s (including Cleopatra), and all but one contained at least one nude figure. [13] [upper-alpha 1] In so doing Etty became the first English artist to treat nude studies as a serious art form in their own right, capable of being aesthetically attractive and of delivering moral messages. [15] Although some nudes by foreign artists were held in private English collections, Britain had no tradition of nude painting, and the display and distribution of nude material to the public had been suppressed since the 1787 Proclamation for the Discouragement of Vice. [16] The supposed prurient reaction of the lower classes to his nude paintings caused concern throughout the 19th century. [17] Many critics condemned his repeated depictions of female nudity as indecent, although his portraits of male nudes were generally well received. [18] (Etty's male nude portraits were primarily of mythological heroes and classical combat, genres in which the depiction of male nudity was considered acceptable in England.) [19] From 1832 onwards, needled by repeated attacks from the press, Etty remained a prominent painter of nudes but made conscious efforts to try to reflect moral lessons in his work. [20]

Composition

Britomart Delivering Amoretta from the Enchantment of Busirane, Henry Fuseli (1824). The Faerie Queene was an extremely popular topic with artists. Fuseli - Britomart.jpg
Britomart Delivering Amoretta from the Enchantment of Busirane, Henry Fuseli (1824). The Faerie Queene was an extremely popular topic with artists.

Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret illustrates a scene from book III of The Faerie Queene , a 16th-century allegorical epic poem by Edmund Spenser, [15] in which Busirane, [upper-alpha 2] an evil sorcerer, abducts the beautiful Amoret (representing married virtue), and tortures her to the point of death. The heroic female warrior Britomart (representing both chastity and Elizabeth I) [21] battles through obstacles to reach the chamber in which Amoret is being held, and slays Busirane moments before he is able to kill Amoret. [22]

Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret was intended by Etty to illustrate the virtues of chastity and honour. [21] It shows the moment in which Busirane is interrupted by Britomart as he prepares to kill Amoret. Amoret is chained to a gilded Solomonic column, carved with depictions of Venus, and her clothes fall from her shoulders as she struggles. [22] Britomart, clad in armour, enters Busirane's Moorish chamber, [15] and tramples a blood-stained grimoire as she swings her sword. [22] Busirane, naked from the waist up and with Chinese-style trousers and queue, [upper-alpha 3] falls to the floor, his blade still pointing at Amoret's heart. [22] Unusually for Etty, Britomart is painted very thinly, with the canvas weave still visible through the paint. Art historian Alison Smith considers that this was likely inspired by Henry Fuseli, who painted a depiction of Britomart using the same style of painting. [15]

In the original poem, Busirane had tortured and cut out the heart of the still-living Amoret by the time of her rescue. [15] [22] When he came to paint Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret Etty had created numerous scenes of combat and death, and would later achieve a degree of critical approbation when it became known that he visited mortuaries to sketch cadavers to ensure the accuracy of his depictions of bodies in varying stages of decomposition. [23] However, he had an aversion to "the offensive and revolting butchery, some have delighted and even revelled in", and disliked the depiction of gratuitous violence. [24] Consequently, in Etty's work Amoret is depicted as physically unharmed by her ordeal, although his composition implies "sadistic torture and occult sexual sorcery". [22]

The Warrior Arming (Godfrey de Bouillon), 1835. Although best known for his treatment of flesh tones, Etty collected armour and was an admirer of Titian's studies of armoured figures, and had a great interest in the effects of light from multiple sources on polished armour. Etty - The Warrior Arming.jpg
The Warrior Arming (Godfrey de Bouillon), 1835. Although best known for his treatment of flesh tones, Etty collected armour and was an admirer of Titian's studies of armoured figures, and had a great interest in the effects of light from multiple sources on polished armour.

Although there is a strong suggestion in his letters that in his early years he had a sexual encounter with one of his models and possibly also a sexual encounter of some kind while in Venice in 1823–24, [27] Etty was devoutly Christian and famously abstemious. [15] [upper-alpha 4] Alison Smith considers the composition of Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret a conscious effort on his part to praise the virtue of chastity by creating a "challenge for the presumably male viewer ... to vanquish lust and cast a pure gaze on vulnerable womanhood". [15] Throughout his career Etty had championed the use of female models in life classes, creating some controversy, and this painting may have been intended to emphasise his belief that "To the pure in heart all things are pure". [15] [29]

Reception

In 1832, the exhibition of Etty's Youth on the Prow, and Pleasure at the Helm had led to significant criticism in some parts of the press for its use of nude figures, with The Morning Chronicle condemning it as an "indulgence of what we once hoped a classical, but which are now convinced, is a lascivious mind". [30] When it was exhibited at the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition in 1833, [31] Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret received much more favourable treatment. [22]

Although it depicted a near-nude woman, a violent death, an occult ritual and the strong implication of sexual torture, critical coverage was overwhelmingly positive. [22] The New Monthly Magazine considered it "a wondrous and rare piece of colour", [32] while The Gentleman's Magazine considered it "a beautiful cabinet picture" of a "truly poetical character". [33] The most effusive praise came from The Literary Gazette :

Grace and beauty in the female form, spirited action in the knight, and fiend-like expression in the magician, unite with the splendid depth of effect produced by the architecture to render this, notwithstanding a slight tendency to blackness in some of the half-tints, one of Mr. Etty's "gems of art".

The Literary Gazette on Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret. [34]

Legacy

William Etty, 1844 Hill & Adamson - William Etty holding brush.jpg
William Etty, 1844

Etty considered Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret one of his major works. [15] Following its exhibition at the 1833 Summer Exhibition, it was exhibited in August of the same year at the Royal Manchester Institution. [15] It was sold at this second exhibition for £157 (about £19,000 in today's terms [35] ) to an anonymous collector listed in Etty's records only as "Mr. L., Manchester". [36] It was one of 133 Etty paintings exhibited in a major retrospective exhibition of his work at the Royal Society of Arts in June–August 1849; [37] during this exhibition it was sold on to Lord Charles Townshend for a sum of 520  guineas (about £72,000 in today's terms [35] ). [38]

Etty died in 1849, [39] having continued working and exhibiting up to his death, [40] and continued to be regarded by many as a pornographer. Charles Robert Leslie observed shortly after Etty's death that "[Etty] himself, thinking and meaning no evil, was not aware of the manner in which his works were regarded by grosser minds". [41] Interest in him declined as new movements came to characterise painting in Britain, and by the end of the 19th century the sales prices achieved by his paintings were falling below the original values. [39]

The Knight Errant, John Everett Millais, 1870 The Knight Errant b John Everett Millais 1870.jpg
The Knight Errant, John Everett Millais, 1870

Townshend sold Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret two years after Etty's death for 510 guineas. It then passed through the hands of several owners over subsequent years, selling for a slightly lower sum each time. [38] It was likely an influence on John Everett Millais's 1870 The Knight Errant, which also showed a distressed nude woman being rescued; [42] although Millais disliked Etty's later works, [43] several of his paintings were strongly influenced by the artist. [44]

In 1919 Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret was bought for 410 guineas (about £25,000 in today's terms [35] ) by William Lever, 1st Viscount Leverhulme, and was one of the 13 Etty works transferred to the Lady Lever Art Gallery, [45] where it remained until 1958. [38] In 1958 it was bought by the Tate Gallery, and as of 2015 it remains in Tate Britain. [46] It was one of five Etty paintings shown as part of Tate Britain's Exposed: The Victorian Nude exhibition, [15] and in 2011–12 it was exhibited as part of a major retrospective of Etty's work at the York Art Gallery. [47] In 2013 Franco Moretti argued that Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret was the "prototypical" example of the Victorian nudes of the later 19th century in which nudity ceased to be a symbol of innocence and instead became a symbol of the coercion of women at the hands of savages, criminals and tyrants. [48]

Footnotes

  1. The sole exception was Guardian Cherubs, a commissioned portrait of the children of Welbore Ellis Agar, 2nd Earl of Normanton. [14]
  2. "Busyrane" in some versions. [15]
  3. Art historian Sarah Burnage suggests that the foreign appearance of Busirane and his chamber, and the implication of sexual contact between himself and Amoret, was an intentional effort to emphasise the importance of her rescue and the virtue of Britomart in killing Busirane. [22]
  4. Professor Jason Edwards of the University of York, writing in 2011, thinks it likely Etty was secretly homosexual. It is certain that he would often meet men in public bath-houses and invite them to pose nude for him. [28]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Etty</span> English painter (1787–1849)

William Etty was an English artist best known for his history paintings containing nude figures. He was the first significant British painter of nudes and still lifes. Born in York, he left school at the age of 12 to become an apprentice printer in Hull. He completed his apprenticeship seven years later and moved to London, where in 1807 he joined the Royal Academy Schools. There he studied under Thomas Lawrence and trained by copying works by other artists. Etty earned respect at the Royal Academy of Arts for his ability to paint realistic flesh tones, but had little commercial or critical success in his first few years in London.

Events from the year 1833 in art.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charlotte Williams-Wynn (diarist)</span>

Charlotte Williams-Wynn was an English letter-writer and diarist.

Mark Louis Hallett is an English art historian specialising in the history of British art. He is the Märit Rausing Director of the Courtauld Institute of Art.

<i>The Sirens and Ulysses</i> 1837 painting by William Etty

The Sirens and Ulysses is a large oil painting on canvas by the English artist William Etty, first exhibited in 1837. It depicts the scene from Homer's Odyssey in which Ulysses (Odysseus) resists the bewitching song of the sirens by having his ship's crew tie him up, while they are ordered to block their own ears to prevent themselves from hearing the song.

<i>The Destroying Angel and Daemons of Evil Interrupting the Orgies of the Vicious and Intemperate</i> 1832 painting by William Etty

The Destroying Angel and Daemons of Evil Interrupting the Orgies of the Vicious and Intemperate, also known as The Destroying Angel and Daemons Inflicting Divine Vengeance on the Wicked and Intemperate and as The Destruction of the Temple of Vice, is an 1832 English oil painting on canvas by English artist William Etty, first exhibited in 1832. Etty had become famous for nude paintings, and acquired a reputation for tastelessness, indecency and a lack of creativity. With The Destroying Angel he hoped to disprove his critics with an openly moral piece. The painting is 127.8 cm by 101.9 cm and depicts a classical temple under attack from a destroying angel and a group of daemons. Some of the humans appear dead or unconscious, others flee or struggle against the daemons.

<i>Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed</i> 1830 painting by William Etty

Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed, rarely known as The Imprudence of Candaules, is a 45.1 by 55.9 cm oil painting on canvas by English artist William Etty, first exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1830. It shows a scene from the Histories by Herodotus, in which Candaules, king of Lydia, invites his bodyguard Gyges to hide in the couple's bedroom and watch his wife Nyssia undress, to prove to him her beauty. Nyssia notices Gyges spying and challenges him to either accept his own execution or to kill Candaules as a punishment. Gyges chooses to kill Candaules and take his place as king. The painting shows the moment at which Nyssia, still unaware that she is being watched by anyone other than her husband, removes the last of her clothes.

<i>Youth on the Prow, and Pleasure at the Helm</i> 1832 painting by William Etty, inspired by a metaphor in Thomas Grays poem The Bard

Youth on the Prow, and Pleasure at the Helm is an oil painting on canvas by English artist William Etty, first exhibited in 1832. Etty had been planning the painting since 1818–19, and an early version was exhibited in 1822. The piece was inspired by a metaphor in Thomas Gray's poem The Bard in which the apparently bright start to the notorious misrule of Richard II of England was compared to a gilded ship whose occupants are unaware of an approaching storm. Etty chose to illustrate Gray's lines literally, depicting a golden boat filled with and surrounded by nude and near-nude figures.

<i>The Wrestlers</i> (Etty) c. 1840 painting of two wrestlers by William Etty

The Wrestlers is an oil painting on millboard by English artist William Etty, painted around 1840 and currently in the York Art Gallery, in York, England. It depicts a wrestling match between a black man and a white man, both glistening with sweat and under an intense light emphasising their curves and musculature. While little documentation of the painting exists prior to 1947, it is likely that it was painted over a period of three evenings at the life class of the Royal Academy.

<i>Preparing for a Fancy Dress Ball</i> Painting by William Etty

Preparing for a Fancy Dress Ball, also known as The Misses Williams-Wynn, is a 173 by 150 cm oil on canvas by English artist William Etty, first exhibited in 1835 and currently in the York Art Gallery. Although Etty was then known almost exclusively for history paintings featuring nude figures, he was commissioned in 1833 by Welsh Conservative politician Charles Watkin Williams-Wynn to paint a portrait of two of his daughters. Preparing for a Fancy Dress Ball shows Williams-Wynn's daughters, Charlotte and Mary, in lavish Italian-style costume: Charlotte, the eldest, is shown standing, helping the seated Mary decorate her hair with a ribbon and a rose. Etty put a good deal of effort into the piece and took much longer than usual to finish it.

<i>Musidora: The Bather At the Doubtful Breeze Alarmed</i> Four nearly identical oil paintings on canvas by English artist William Etty

Musidora: The Bather 'At the Doubtful Breeze Alarmed', also known as The Bather, is a name given to four nearly identical oil paintings on canvas by English artist William Etty. The paintings illustrate a scene from James Thomson's 1727 poem Summer in which a young man accidentally sees a young woman bathing naked and is torn between his desire to look and his knowledge that he ought to look away. The scene was popular with English artists as it was one of the few legitimate pretexts to paint nudes at a time when the display and distribution of nude imagery was suppressed.

<i>The World Before the Flood</i> 1828 painting by William Etty

The World Before the Flood is an oil-on-canvas painting by the English artist William Etty, first exhibited in 1828 and currently in the Southampton City Art Gallery. It depicts a scene from John Milton's Paradise Lost in which, among a series of visions of the future shown to Adam, he sees the world immediately before the Great Flood. The painting illustrates the stages of courtship as described by Milton: a group of men select wives from a group of dancing women, drag their chosen woman from the group, and settle down to married life. Behind the courting group, an oncoming storm looms, foreshadowing the destruction which the dancers and lovers are about to bring upon themselves.

<i>The Combat: Woman Pleading for the Vanquished</i> Oil painting on canvas by English artist William Etty

The Combat: Woman Pleading for the Vanquished is a large oil painting on canvas by English artist William Etty, first exhibited in 1825 and now in the National Gallery of Scotland. Inspired by the Elgin Marbles and intended by the artist to provide a moral lesson on "the beauty of mercy", it shows a near-nude warrior whose sword has broken, forced to his knees in front of another near-nude soldier who prepares to inflict a killing blow. A woman, also near-nude, clutches the victorious warrior to beg him for mercy. Unusually for a history painting of the period, The Combat does not depict a scene from history, literature or religion and is not based on an existing artwork, but is instead a scene from the artist's own imagination.

<i>Portrait of Mlle Rachel</i> Painting by William Etty

Portrait of Mlle Rachel is an oil painting on millboard by English artist William Etty, painted during the 1840s and currently in the York Art Gallery. It shows the tragic actress Élisa Rachel Félix, better known as Mademoiselle Rachel, at the time one of the most acclaimed actresses in France. The subject is not shown looking at the artist, but glancing anxiously out of the picture with tears in her eyes. The work was probably painted during one of Rachel's tours of London in the 1840s. It appears unfinished, suggesting that it was painted in a single sitting and Rachel did not return to give Etty the opportunity to complete it.

<i>The Triumph of Cleopatra</i> 1821 painting by William Etty

The Triumph of Cleopatra, also known as Cleopatra's Arrival in Cilicia and The Arrival of Cleopatra in Cilicia, is an oil painting by English artist William Etty. It was first exhibited in 1821, and is now in the Lady Lever Art Gallery in Port Sunlight, Merseyside. During the 1810s Etty had become widely respected among staff and students at the Royal Academy of Arts, in particular for his use of colour and ability to paint realistic flesh tones. Despite having exhibited at every Summer Exhibition since 1811, he attracted little commercial or critical interest. In 1820, he exhibited The Coral Finder, which showed nude figures on a gilded boat. This painting attracted the attention of Sir Francis Freeling, who commissioned a similar painting on a more ambitious scale.

<i>The Dawn of Love</i> (painting) Oil painting on canvas by English artist William Etty

The Dawn of Love, also known as Venus Now Wakes, and Wakens Love, is an oil painting on canvas by English artist William Etty, first exhibited in 1828 and currently in the Russell-Cotes Art Gallery & Museum in Bournemouth. Loosely based on a passage from John Milton's 1634 masque Comus, it shows a nude Venus leaning across to wake the sleeping Love by stroking his wings. While Etty often included nude figures in his work, he rarely depicted physical intimacy, and owing to this, The Dawn of Love is one of his more unusual paintings. The open sensuality of the work was intended to present a challenge to the viewer mirroring the plot of Comus, in which the heroine is tempted by desire but remains rational and detached.

Martin Myrone is lead curator, British art to 1800 at the Tate Gallery.

Richard Green is an art curator and art critic.

Dennis Larry Ashwell Farr was a British art historian and curator. Through his writings and the exhibitions he organised in his positions as director of City Museums and Art Gallery in Birmingham (1969–1980) and subsequently as director of the Courtauld Institute Galleries (1980–93), Farr established a reputation as a champion of 20th century British art.

<i>Britomart Delivering Amoretta from the Enchantment of Busirane</i> 1824 painting by Henry Fuseli

Britomart Delivering Amoretta from the Enchantment of Busirane is a 1824 oil painting on canvas by Swiss painter Henry Fuseli. It depicts a scene from Edmund Spenser's poem The Faerie Queene in which the female knight Britomart frees Amoretta, a beautiful woman, from her captivity at the hands of Busirane, an evil sorcerer.

References

Notes

  1. 1 2 Farr 1958, p. 2.
  2. Farr 1958, p. 4.
  3. Farr 1958, p. 5.
  4. Gilchrist 1855, p. 31.
  5. Smith 1996, p. 86.
  6. Myrone 2011, p. 47.
  7. 1 2 Farr 1958, p. 15.
  8. Green 2011, p. 61.
  9. Burnage 2011d, p. 31.
  10. Burnage 2011b, p. 118.
  11. Burnage 2011c, p. 198.
  12. Burnage 2011b, p. 106.
  13. Burnage 2011d, p. 32.
  14. Farr 1958, p. 52.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Smith 2001a, p. 57.
  16. Smith 2001b, p. 53.
  17. Smith 2001b, p. 55.
  18. Smith 2001a, p. 54.
  19. Burnage 2011d, pp. 32–33.
  20. Burnage 2011d, p. 42.
  21. 1 2 Robinson 2007, p. 190.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Burnage 2011b, p. 132.
  23. Robinson 2007, p. 227.
  24. Farr 1958, p. 50.
  25. Burnage 2011a, p. 174.
  26. Farr 1958, p. 71.
  27. Robinson 2007, p. 466.
  28. Edwards 2011, p. 93.
  29. Etty, William (1 February 1849). "Autobiography in Letters Addressed to a Relative". The Art Journal. 1. London: George Virtue: 37–40.
  30. Burnage 2011d, p. 33.
  31. Burnage & Bertram 2011, p. 24.
  32. "Fine Arts". The New Monthly Magazine. 1. London: Henry Colburn: 456. June 1833.
  33. "Fine Arts". The Gentleman's Magazine. 103. Westminster: J. B. Nichols and Son: 445. May 1833.
  34. "Fine Arts: Royal Academy". The Literary Gazette and Journal of Belles Lettres, Arts, Sciences, &c. (851). London: W. A. Scripps: 299. 11 May 1833.
  35. 1 2 3 UK Retail Price Index inflation figures are based on data from Clark, Gregory (2017). "The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)". MeasuringWorth . Retrieved 7 May 2024.
  36. Robinson 2007, p. 283.
  37. Farr 1958, p. 107.
  38. 1 2 3 Farr 1958, p. 140.
  39. 1 2 Robinson 2007, p. 440.
  40. Burnage 2011e, p. 243.
  41. Leslie, Charles Robert (30 March 1850). "Lecture on the Works of the late W. Etty, Esq, R.A., by Professor Leslie". The Athenæum (1170). London: 352.
  42. Robinson 2007, p. 437.
  43. Farr 1958, p. 109.
  44. Smith 1996, p. 149.
  45. Robinson 2007, p. 447.
  46. "Britomart Redeems Faire Amoret". London: Tate. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
  47. Burnage 2011b, p. 133.
  48. Moretti 2013, p. 108.

Bibliography