Building Back Better

This article is about the United Nations program. For the slogan used by the 46th president of the United States, see Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign. For the proposed $7 trillion COVID-19 relief, future economic, and infrastructure package, see Build Back Better Plan. For the initiative by G7 countries, see Build Back Better World.

Building Back Better, or more frequently termed Build Back Better (BBB), is a strategy aimed at reducing the risk to the people of nations and communities in the wake of future disasters and shocks. It is a conceptual strategy that has continued to evolve since its origination in May 2005. However, what continues is the overall goal of enabling countries and communities to be stronger and more resilient following a disaster by reducing vulnerability to future disasters. Building resilience entails addressing physical, social, environmental, and economic vulnerabilities and shocks. ^[1]

BBB has its roots in the improvement of land use, spatial planning and construction standards through the reconstruction and recovery process. The concept has expanded to represent a broader opportunity by building greater resilience in recovery by systematically addressing the root causes of vulnerability. ^[2]

BBB has been described in the United Nations' (UN) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction document, which was agreed on at the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction held on March 14–18, 2015, in Sendai, Japan. It was adopted by the UN member states at the UN General Assembly on June 3, 2015, as one of four priorities in the Sendai Framework for disaster recovery, risk reduction and sustainable development.

Notably, the Sendai Framework was only agreed more than ten years after the BBB concept had originated in Indonesia. Further, the concept continued to evolve with a history of being tested in recovery and reconstruction following major disasters including the Indonesian Ocean Tsunami of December 2004, Hurricane Katrina on the Gulf Coast of the United States in August 2005, the Kashmir earthquake in Pakistan in October 2005, the Haiti earthquake in January 2010 and Super Typhoon Yolanda in the Philippines in November 2013. Thus, BBB was not first coined by Sendai as claimed by some international agencies and researchers. Rather, it was the Sendai Framework that enabled its endorsement by the United Nations in June 2015. ^[3]

Concept Origins - Reconstruction after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami in Indonesia

The term BBB was actually first coined in Indonesia by the World Bank and the Badan Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi (BRR) NAD-Nias, i.e. the Agency for the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction of Aceh and Nias, following the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami and planning for recovery and reconstruction. The term BBB was used throughout both the preliminary stocktake of May 2005 ^[4] and the October 2005 Brief for the Coordination Forum Aceh and Nias (CFAN). ^[5]

Knowledge of the characteristics of the disaster and its impacts including deaths and injuries, destruction and damage to assets, infrastructure and land, as well as the impacts on the economy and livelihoods were essential to approach BBB. Social and cultural impacts were also important to assess. Furthermore, the geographical locations and extents of impacts are essential and are aided by reliable and accessible pre- and post-disaster mapping and geospatial information.

Earlier estimates, drawing upon the initial World Bank Preliminary Stocktake of May 2005 actually put the death toll at around 150,000 dead, with 127,000 houses destroyed and 500,000 left homeless. Over time, as more detailed assessments were undertaken, the tolls rose. Contributory factors to needing to revise statistics on loss and damage were due to unreliable government records including periodic censuses, pursuit of haste driven by development agencies and civil society wanting to contribute aid, lack of expertise in damage assessment much of which was initially crowd-sourced, poor or inadequate mapping (geospatial information). It was subsequently estimated that of the estimated 230,000 tsunami deaths across fourteen countries, up to 220,000 deaths were in Aceh and North Sumatra alone. The death toll in Aceh and North Sumatra actually exceeded both atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined in World War 2. Other losses and damages in Aceh and North Sumatra included more than 230km of roads damaged or destroyed and 9 seaports damaged. Also, two hospitals were destroyed and five hospitals were severely damaged along with 26 primary health care centers identified as being destroyed. There were 1,488 schools destroyed leaving around 150,000 children without education to education. The total value of damage assessment in Aceh and North Sumatra was estimated at around US4.45 billion.

Geophysical experts have determined that the tsunami was caused by what has been named as the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake which occurred on December 26, 2004, at 07:58:53 local time. This was a major earthquake with a magnitude of 9.1–9.3Mw and its epicenter was around 240 kilometers (150 miles) from the coast of North Sumatra, Indonesia. The sheer magnitude of this earthquake was estimated to have generated an energy release equivalent to 23,000 Hiroshima-type atomic bombs, i.e. each being 15 kiloton of TNT. Banda Aceh was the urban location closest to the earthquake’s epicenter where tsunami waves soared to more than 30 meters (100 feet) and travelled across the Indian Ocean at more than 800 kilometers per hour (500 miles per hour). ^{[6] [7] [8]}

Global attention to the term BBB arose following the address by UN Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery Bill Clinton to the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) in July 2005. Clinton first visited Aceh in May 2005 in his role as Special Envoy. However, he had earlier visited Aceh in February 2005 with former US President George W. Bush. Clinton's May 2005 visit included meetings with the World Bank, BRR, as well as multilaterals and civil society. Clinton's reporting drew heavily from his briefings from the World Bank and BRR and the aforementioned Preliminary Stocktaking Report published in May 2005 by the World Bank. ^{[9] [10] [11]}

Specifically, the BBB Strategy was conceived during the preparation of the Reconstruction of Aceh Land Administration System (RALAS) project in Indonesia by the World Bank during May-June 2005. RALAS was the first reconstruction project initiated and approved under the Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Aceh and North Sumatra (MDTF), supervised by the World Bank, with funding of US$28 million. The MDTF ultimately funded eleven projects for a total of around US$500 million. The concept and context of BBB arose in discussions between the World Bank RALAS project task team and the BRR.

Thus, RALAS was the first project to embrace BBB, and it intentionally focused on the sustainability and resilience of communities to future disasters and conflict. At the time of RALAS approval, the Aceh Civil War, known as the Insurgency in Aceh had been underway since 1976. The conflict ended with the truce agreement signed in Helsinki August 15, 2005. RALAS was implemented by the Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN), the National Land Authority of Indonesia. Key achievements under RALAS included: community land mapping of more than 330,000 land parcels over Aceh and North Sumatra enabling housing reconstruction to proceed more quickly with confidence and 230,000 new titles issued to legitimate owners by project closure on June 30 2009 and more than 300,000 titles following project closure with 30 percent of all titles issued to women; new spatial planning undertaken for the reallocation of land; Acehnese women afforded equal land rights for the first time in Aceh’s history; government and civil society worked closely with mosques to ensure that inheritance rights, especially for widows and orphans. Further outcomes included construction of earthquake resistent land offices, computerization of all land records and secure storage. The World Bank maintained a strong presence in Aceh to work closely with BPN, civil society and UN agencies throughout the RALAS implementation.

Clinton specifically commented on RALAS after his first visit as the Special Envoy in May 2005. "I can think of nothing that will generate more income over the long run for average families in this region than actually having title to the land they own," he said. "Then, they will be able to borrow money and build a much more diversified, much more modern economy." At the time of Clinton’s first visit, it was reported in the media, including The Sydney Morning Herald (Australia), that only 25 people who lost their homes in Aceh could prove their title to land. However, Clinton himself was to raise concerns over delays with RALAS, as early as December 2006, just eighteen months after the approval of RALAS in June 2005 and project commencement in August 2005. However, prior to the tsunami, less than twenty percent of land owners in Aceh had legal title, and most existing land records held by BPN in Aceh had been severely damaged or destroyed.

RALAS implementation faced many challenges including BPN capacity, where some forty staff in Banda Aceh had been killed in the tsunami. The project experienced delays due to capacity, procurement and governance and there was only a small quantity of land titles issued during the first two years. Whilst the project targets were challenging and ambitious, they were not unrealistic. RALAS experienced delays along with most other reconstruction projects. Although the final project results were not fully satisfactory, overall most were achieved and only around US$15 million of the allocated US$28 million was expended. ^{[12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22]}

RALAS was the first of eleven World Bank - MDTF projects. Twelve months after the tsunami struck, a Joint Report was published by BRR and development partners and released through the World Bank. The report has forewords by then Indonesian President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, and Special Envoy Clinton. Notably, the second reconstruction project under World Bank – MDTF only commenced after late 2006. However, the World Bank did use the pre-tsunami Kecamatan Development Program (KDP) to help in reconstruction efforts and it also subscribed to BBB. However, the report reveals many of the challenges facing reconstruction and recovery across all sectors including land. Indirectly, it illustates why recovery and reconstruction is so difficult unless a prior plan and system is in place. Recovery and reconstruction is more than just access to funds as it requires strong coordination as well as an effective monitoring and evaluation system which is location-based. ^[23]

Introduction of the concept to the UN - 2005

The term BBB was first introduced to UN at ECOSOC in July 2005 by Clinton, the Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery. Clinton drew heavily from his briefings especially from the World Bank, BRR and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and notably from the special preliminary stocktaking report (May 2005) prepared by the World Bank. Clinton's address and (written report) included ten key propositions for BBB. Preparedness to deal with future disasters and building resilience were key propositions. Also, the importance of effective coordination by government of the efforts of international development agencies including UN agencies, multilaterals such as the World Bank and ADB, civil society and NGOs. Clinton also stressed the important roles of communities to drive recovery and reconstruction efforts and ensuring that communities were left safer by reducing risks and building resilience. The impact on livelihoods was not forgotten by Clinton and also the need to strengthen government institutions at local levels to foster recovery. Clearly, there is a fair degree of correlation between a number of Clinton's propositions for BBB and what was ultimately defined as the BBB core principles (discussed later). ^[24]

The Sendai Framework - 2015

During the negotiation period for the Sendai Framework, the concept of "Build Back Better" was proposed by the Japanese delegation as a holistic concept which states: "The principle of 'Build Back Better' is generally understood to use the disaster as a trigger to create more resilient nations and societies than before. This was through the implementation of well-balanced disaster risk reduction measures, including physical restoration of infrastructure, revitalization of livelihood and economy/industry, and the restoration of local culture and environment". The concept was fully agreed as one of the most important concepts among each state's delegates and embedded into what is known as the Sendai Framework.

At the opening speech of the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, held March 14–18, 2015, in Sendai, Japan Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister of Japan, stated: "The word of "Build Back Better" sounds like a new concept, but this is common sense to the Japanese people, coming from our historical experiences in recovering from disaster and preparing for the future, and it has become an important part of the culture of Japan." ^[25]

The Sendai Framework explicitly identified Building Back Better in recovery, reconstruction, and rehabilitation. ^[3] The framework was adopted by UN member states as one of four priorities in the Sendai Framework for disaster recovery, risk reduction and sustainable development. ^[3] The UN General Assembly adopted this document on June 3, 2015.

One is given cause to wonder why it took over a decade from the time of BBB's conception in Aceh in May 2005 until the Sendai Conference and negotiations of March 2015. During that decade the world experienced some of the worst losses of human life from natural disasters in history since at least the 1970s, according to the list of natural disasters by death toll.

The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction has issued a volume of its Words into Action guidelines for BBB. While there can be no standardized blueprint for building back better, the guidelines offer step-by-step guidance on developing disaster recovery frameworks, pre-disaster recovery planning and post-disaster needs assessment. ^[26]

After the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction was finalized, the performance indicators were defined as: "The use of the recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction phases after a disaster to increase the resilience of nations and communities through integrating disaster risk reduction measures into the restoration of physical infrastructure and societal systems, and into the revitalization of livelihoods, economies and the environment. Annotation: The term “societal” will not be interpreted as a political system of any country." ^[27]

Following the UN Conference in Sendai, BBB was also included in the book Disaster Risk Reduction for Economic Growth and Livelihood, Investing in Resilience and Development, Chapter 7 "Recovery and reconstruction: An opportunity for sustainable growth through 'build back better'". BBB had been used by people involved in the recovery process from natural disasters, but had not been as clearly described as a holistic concept before this book. ^[28]

BBB Core Principles

Since the initial conception of BBB, and various applications of it following disasters around the global and also following Sendai, it would seem there is a wide acceptance of the seven core principles which were well articulated at the World Reconstruction Conference 4, held May 13, 2019 - May 14, 2019 Geneva, Switzerland, convened by the World Bank and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). GFDRR is global partnership program, under the administration of the World Bank, and was established in September 2006. Notably, there is a degree of correlation between a number of the aforementioned Clinton's propositions for BBB core principles. ^[29]

In consideration of the seven core principles, it would be appropriate to consider these under four core themes:

People and communities

• "People affected by disaster should be the decision-makers." Government and development agencies should work with people and communities to ensure that needs are met and communities and people own outcomes.
• "Reconstruction and recovery efforts must recognize diversity." Aceh demonstrated the important roles especially of women in reconstruction of housing and communities.
• "Communities should be allowed to use their own resources wherever possible." The use of local resources promotes the local economy and rebuilds livelihoods. It can also assist with inflationary pressures.

Governance and accountability

• "Agencies must be accountable to the people they seek to assist." Governance is paramount and corruption is high risk.

Economic and Financial

• "Recovery of local economy and livelihoods must be a priority." The financial and economic shocks of major disasters present major challenges to recovery and reconstruction enabling return to what is considered normal. Reconstruction efforts can enable these through utilizing local people to support reconstruction and drawing on local materials and resources as may be available.

Future Risk Management

• "Do no harm: learn from the past and avoid unnecessary damage to future recovery." This extends especially to social and cultural issues.
• "Reconstruction must take account of future hazards and risks." This is fundamental to BBB.

Benefits

Investment in Resilience

Building disaster-resilient infrastructure and early warning systems, is costly, but typically yields benefits 4-36 times higher than initial outlay. However, there is a need to ensure there is maintenance of systems and assets, or else investments may be wasted and with catastrophic consequences. As reported later, there are clear lessons arising from the 2018 Sulawesi tsunami disaster where government failed to maintain the early warning system installed as part of the post 2004 tsunami BBB reconstruction.

Furthermore, it has been identified that resilience to natural shocks may be strengthened through better reconstruction processes. For example, adopting standards for earthquake-resistant housing and buildings will reduce damage from subsequent earthquakes. Through planning approvals, build housing only in areas which are deemed less vulnerable to flooding and in areas which have been subject to flooding, rebuild with a free-board consideration so that the habitable areas of houses and buildings are above designated flood levels. In coastal areas prone to surge, resilience can be enhanced by not occupying land below the Mean High-Water Mark (MHWM) and, in some circumstances, pulling well back from MHWM. This means only occupying lands that are above MHWM and possibly a significant height above MHWM to minimize risk due to tidal surge. Significantly, this may mean a change to land rights. Those foreshore areas left vacant after pulling back would become public open space. An example of this was in Leyte after the Yolanda disaster, where Bell of the World Bank advised on a "no occupancy" and "no build" zone for impacted foreshore properties, which was subsequently fixed at 40 meters setback from MHWB for residential purposes but without change for business purposes (viz. mainly fishing). This required changes to land titles leading to complaints and disputes with local landowners. However, it was a government decision to enable building back better with risk reduction. Thus, with such setbacks from established MHWM, this would usually mean that such foreshore areas are reserved as public open space.

The World Bank has estimated that the annual global benefits of building back better could be up to US$173 billion per year. ^{[30] [31] [32] [33]}

In India, super-cyclone BOB06 killed more than 10,000 people in 1999. During recovery, the state government established the Odisha State Disaster Mitigation Authority (OSDMA) to help facilitate loss prevention through programs such as adding over 1,500 km (930 mi) of new evacuation roads, 30 bridges to better connect vulnerable communities and improvements to 200 km (120 mi) of existing coastal embankments. Additionally, the OSDMA invested in advanced early warning systems. Such investments in future disaster loss prevention, have been, in retrospect, important inputs to what was later termed BBB. When Odisha was hit by Cyclone Phailin in 2013, 50 people were killed, which was less than 1 percent of BOB06's casualties.

Stimulation of local economies

In Madagascar, farmers benefited as much as 4.5 times their income after the risk of flooding was reduced through watershed protection in Mantadia National Park. ^[34] In India, following the 2001 Gujarat earthquake, the Self-Employed Women's Association (SEWA) set up learning centers for local women to facilitate recovery which included tools, techniques and information about government schemes. These centers sustained the economic activities of women and have served as focal points during flood recovery since the earthquake. ^[35]

Other benefits

The benefits of BBB extend beyond risk reduction. In Malaysia, the government did not only save an estimated cost of US$300,000/km by maintaining the mangrove swamps intact for storm protection and flood control, but also lowered the temperature in the area. ^[36]

Variants of BBB and benefits

There would seem to be at least three variants of BBB, viz. Building Back Stronger, Building Back Faster, and Building Back More Inclusively, which have been raised by World Bank, GFDRR and others. It does not ignore other households which may have higher incomes. RALAS was a good example of this BBB variant.

Prior to 2018, annual global losses due to disasters were estimated to be around US300 billion per year. ^{[37] [38]}

2018 Sulawesi Tsunami Disaster - A Lesson in Government Failure

Given that the declared motto of the reconstruction of Aceh and North Sumatra was “build back better” following the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami, it was something that should have resonated strongly with the Indonesia government and people. BBB aimed to support achieving a higher level of governance, better infrastructure, social services and a stronger level of economic activity than existed before the tsunami. Also, BBB’s post-tsunami response provided early warning to enable communities and individuals to be provided with sufficient advance warning to enable them to urgently move to safe locations. The early warning system was for all of Indonesia and not just Aceh and North Sumatra. Indonesia comprises thousands of islands and is part of the largest archipelago in the world, the Malay Archipelago, between the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Following the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, Indonesia installed an advanced tsunami warning system, comprising a network of 21 buoys to provide advance warnings based on data gathered by deep sea sensors. With this investment, Indonesia should have been well-prepared for future shocks and the traumatic Aceh and North Sumatra experience forever entrenched in the country’s government. The system was designed to provide early warning to communities and citizens and sound alarms. Such a system can help prevent loss of life and injuries. No early warning system can prevent destruction of housing, infrastructure and assets.

However, on September 28, 2018, a powerful earthquake off the Indonesian island of Sulawesi on Friday caused a tsunami resulted in thousands of deaths and massive losses. The 2018 Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami resulted in a reported 4,340 killed and 10,679 injured with almost 700 missing. At least 70,000 houses were destroyed and more than 200,000 left homeless.

The Indonesian system failed to prevent the huge loss of life. Many of the buoys did not work, with some having been damaged by vandals and others stolen. The government had failed to maintain the system by providing sufficient funding. The lack of funding impacted the ability of all buoys to function. Had apathy crept in almost after almost fourteen years since Boxing Day 2004? It was reported the system for Sulawesi had not been fully operational since 2012. So, although some warnings were issued to residents mainly via SMS TXT, the majority of people did not receive or heed such warnings. This was further exacerbated by the failure of any warning alarms to alert people to the tsunami.

The key lesson in all of this is that outcomes of BBB should never be taken for granted and presumed that all is well because investments were made. Systems must be maintained, and people must be regularly reminded to be aware of alerts and alarms. The government must remain vigilant and ensure that it provides sufficient funding for system operation, maintenance, and capital improvement. It must also monitor the security of systems to reduce theft and vandalism. The Indonesian government failed with the Sulawesi tsunami, and the impacts were truly catastrophic. ^{[39] [40] [41]}

Pakistan - Kashmir 2005 Earthquake Reconstruction

The October 8,2005 Kashmir earthquake is an example that drew upon the learnings of the response to the 2004 tsunami disaster in Aceh and North Sumatra. The destruction saw greater than 73,000 deaths and around 2.8 million people left homeless. The Pakistan Government embraced the BBB concept where it identified the large-scale devastation as a “window of opportunity to improve the prevalent methods and quality of construction”. In particular, the government saw the development of seismic-resistant structural designs as core to its BBB mantra. It also saw the opportunity to support the economy and livelihoods by utilizing local and regional construction materials which were available in quantities to support rebuilding. The government requested the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank to undertake a preliminary damage and needs assessment. This assessment was prepared on the basis of globally accepted standards for the quantification of post-disaster damage and needs. The assessment established that it would require around US$5.2 billion for reconstruction, which allowed for around US$1.4 billion for rebuilding damaged and destroyed houses. Thus, the Rural Housing Reconstruction Program (RHRP) was conceived at a cost estimate of over US$1.5 billion. RHRP was prepared in collaboration with international development agencies including the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. The World Bank’s financial assistance for housing reconstruction was US$210 million. Interestingly the World Bank-GFDRR Rural Housing Reconstruction Program manual was not published until May 2013, and drew heavily from over seven years reconstruction experience in Kashmir.

Some of the main features of BBB included seismic-resistant housing reconstruction, maximization of community engagement, with training, to support an owner-driven, assisted, and inspected reconstruction regime. Under RHRP, the seismic-resistant reconstruction was enabled through the development of appropriate construction standards and structural design options using local materials and knowledge. Also, large-scale training of a critical mass of building tradespeople was undertaken. Homeowners were also trained in the use of these standards and other requirements for housing reconstruction in a work-safe manner. ^[42]

Haiti 2010 Earthquake

The term BBB was actually used in 2009 by Clinton while referring to Haiti after the political upheaval and storms of 2008. ^[43] However, BBB was first used in the context of the mssive Haiti earthquake disaster by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon in February 2010. ^[44]

The earthquake which struck Haiti on January 12, 2010, killed an estimated 200,000 people in the Port-au-Prince metropolitan area and neighboring zones. As a result of extensive devastation, hundreds of thousands of survivors were left homeless. One of the early actions of the government was to relocate 400,000 people to camps outside Port-au-Prince. The World Bank drew on its experiences from Aceh and a number of the key World Bank experts were engaged to support the response to Haiti. Like Haiti, after the 2004 Tsunami, Aceh experienced generous inflows of financial assistance from the international development community from around the world. Significantly, the pledged financial assistance was considered to be sufficient to “build back better".

In order to support the Haitian government planning and design for recovery and reconstruction operations, the World Bank and GFDRR mobilized the World Bank Global Expert Team (GET) drawing on inhouse experts (several who had worked in Aceh on initial BBB, including Wolfgang Fengler, Scott Guggenheim, Josef Leitmann and Keith Clifford Bell) and supplemented by external consultant experts. An early task was to prepare Knowledge/Good Practice Notes on what were identified as the ten priority recovery and reconstruction issues, viz. Building Seismic Safety Assessment; Debris Management; Environmental and Social Assessment; Experience with Post Disaster Income Support Programs; Land Tenure; Management of Recovery Managing Post-Disaster Aid; Rebuild or Relocate; Transitional Shelter, and; Helping Women and Children to Recover and Build Resilient Communities. A key message from GET was that it was possible for Haiti to build back better after the devastating earthquake as had been proven in Aceh and North Sumatra after the tsunami. Government leadership was identified as the key factor for successful recovery in Haiti and it was essential for the international development community to strengthen the government’s role to lead Haiti’s recovery and avoid fragment of assistance. ^[45]

Nepal 2015 Gorkha Earthquake and Disaster Management

The April 2015 Nepal earthquake (also known as the Gorkha earthquake) resulted in almost 9,000 deaths and 22,000 injured. Damages were assessed at greater than US$7 billion, and it was estimated that almost 1 million citizens were pushed into poverty. The disaster impacted at least 8 million people, equivalent to around 30 percent of the population. Fundamental to Nepal’s reconstruction was BBB, with the additional qualification of “leave no one behind”. Nepal has a long recurrent history of earthquakes, so reconstruction focused on ensuring seismic resistance to enable resilience to future shocks and stresses based on international standards. Training of engineers, tradespeople and homeowners was provided and there was a significant emphasis on instilling a safer construction culture where everyone was familiar with the compliance measures necessary for resilient construction.

Nepal’s Ministry of Home Affairs publishes a biennial Nepal Disaster Report (NDR) which especially embraces the agreements of the Sendai Framework. This biennial report has been published since 2007-09. Given the disaster-prone nature of Nepal which include earthquakes, landslides and fires, the NDR is very much focussed on disaster management and resilience. Thus, Nepal through its biennially revised NDR, fosters principles of risk-informed development, and socially inclusive approaches for disaster management and risk reduction. ^{[46] [47]}

Other Post-disaster Applications of BBB

During the reconstruction from the earthquake of Central Java in March 2006, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Reconstruction team adopted the BBB concept to support housing reconstruction. They used earthquake-resistant technology and constructed more than 100,000 strengthened houses within two years under the leadership of Java Special Province. ^[48]

After the major disaster in Java, international donors collaborated on a report: the Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA). In the PDNA for Tropical Storm Ondoy and Typhoon Pepeng in the Philippines, PDNA team member Takeya Kimio from the Asian Development Bank strongly recommended BBB in disaster recovery. They^{[ clarification needed ]} wanted to make sure that BBB was first used in the Philippines government reconstruction policy document. BBB was also clearly written as a catchphrase on the first page of the document titled "Reconstruction Assistance on Yolanda". ^[49]

Further Researcher Considerations

The topics of recovery, reconstruction and building resilience, which draw upon the BBB concepts and experienced around the globe have been reported by many academics and researchers. Examples included here are:

• The researched book by Mannakkara, Wilkinson and Potangaroa called Resilient Post Disaster Recovery through Building Back Better developed a framework for BBB, including indicators that have been tested in a number of countries. ^[50] In the book, the authors argue for a holistic approach incorporating disaster risk reduction activities with community engagement, effective monitoring and implementation. Those arguments could generally be consistent with the key tenets of the BBB core principles.

• For a critical account of the concept and its usage in the context of attempts by states, multilateral agencies and NGOs to use disasters for projects of neoliberal enclosure and disaster capitalism, see Raja Swamy's "Building Back Better in India: Development, NGOs, and Artisanal Fishers after the 2004 Tsunami" ^[51] Swamy calls attention to how narratives of betterment dominate official discourses of disaster recovery, linking recovery with the needs and goals of capital while aiding in the further dispossession and marginalization of affected populations.

Bell (former World Bank) and Evtimov (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO) have delivered an authoritative chapter “Land Administration and Authoritative Geospatial Information: Lessons from Disasters to Support Building Resilience to Pandemics” in the University of Melbourne publication “COVID-19 Pandemic, Geospatial Information, and Community Resilience: Global Applications and Lessons” (2021). They have drawn upon their respective many decades of experience in disaster reconstruction and building disaster resilience to apply the lessons of BBB to the context of the covid pandemic. They reported on how BBB had taken on broader roles including low carbon, climate change, green growth, the digital economy, addressing inequality, amongst other topics. Consistent with good practices they reported on the importance of investing in geospatial information and mapping through national and regional spatial data infrastructure as well as comprehensive land administration systems that addressed land rights, planning development and other land-related themes. ^[52]

See also

• Disaster capitalism

References

1. "Building Back Better in Post-Disaster Recovery" (PDF). World Bank/GFDRR. Retrieved 19 January 2020.
2. Hallegatte, Stephane; Rentschler, Jun; Walsh, Brian. "Building Back Better: Achieving resilience through stronger, faster, and more inclusive post-disaster reconstruction" (PDF). World Bank/GFDRR. Retrieved 19 January 2020.
3. UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2015). endai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. UNISDR. Retrieved 19 January 2020.
4. World Bank (2005), Rebuilding a Better Aceh and Nias: Rebuilding a better Aceh and Nias : Preliminary Stocktaking of the Reconstruction Effort Six Months After the Earthquake and Tsunami, J. Clarke (Ed), Publication Number 32895, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/295181468285599568/pdf/328930Replacement0aceh16months.pdf
5. Rebuilding a Better Aceh and Nias Stocktaking of the Reconstruction Effort: Brief for CFAN, October 2005, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/295181468285599568/pdf/328930Replacement0aceh16months.pdf
6. World Bank, 10 Years After the Tsunami: What We Lost and What We Learned, https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/voices/10-years-after-tsunami-what-we-lost-and-what-we-learned
7. World Vision 2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami: Facts and FAQs, https://www.worldvision.org/disaster-relief-news-stories/2004-indian-ocean-earthquake-tsunami-facts#:~:text=Approximately%20230%2C000%20people%20died%20in,23%2C000%20Hiroshima%2Dtype%20atomic%20bombs
8. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition, The Boxing Day Tsunami in Numbers, https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/media/3767/tsunami-stats-facts.pdf
9. "Clinton visits tsunami-ravaged Banda Aceh". NBC News . 28 May 2005.
10. "Bush and Clinton see Aceh damage". ABC News. 20 February 2005.
11. Clinton, William J. "Lesson Learned from Tsunami Recovery:Ten Key Propositions for Building Back Better" (PDF). Retrieved 19 January 2020.
12. UN Habitat, Report 3/2021, Urban and Rural Land Linkages: a Concept and Framework for Action, https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2021/09/urban-rural-land-linkages-a-concept-and-framework-for-action.pdf
13. The Guardian, Indonesia signs Aceh peace deal, August 15, 2005, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/aug/15/indonesia.tsunami20041
14. World Bank (2005). Rebuilding a Better Aceh and Nias: Stocktaking of the Reconstruction Effort – Brief for the Coordination Forum Aceh and Nias (CFAN). Washington, D.C., https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/295181468285599568/pdf/328930Replacement0aceh16months.pdf
15. World Bank (2010). RALAS ICR Report. Washington, D.C., https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/996811468044637748/pdf/ICR13060P095881Official0use0only191.pdf
16. Bell, KC, (2009), RECONSTRUCTION OF ACEH LAND ADMINISTRATION: THE MULTI-DONOR RESPONSE AND PROGRESS SO FAR, World Bank Land and Poverty Conference, March 11 2009, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327270347_RECONSTRUCTION_OF_ACEH_LAND_ADMINISTRATION_THE_MULTI-DONOR_RESPONSE_AND_PROGRESS_SO_FAR
17. Bell, K.C. (2011), Lessons from the Reconstruction of Post-Tsunami Aceh: Build Back Better Through Ensuring Women are at the Center of Reconstruction of Land and Property, World Bank Publication 64871, August 2011, Smart Lessons, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/772771468326134196/pdf/648710BRI0IFC00Bell0PostTsunamiAceh.pdf
18. World Bank, (2010), prepared by KC Bell et al, Study on Gender Impacts of Land Titling in Post-Tsunami Aceh, Indonesia, Publication 63527, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/126381468285613599/pdf/635270WP0P075001B00PUBLIC00Aceh0web.pdf
19. MDF-JRF Working Paper Series: Lessons Learned from Post-Disaster Reconstruction in Indonesia, Publication 83902, Working Paper 4, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/455331468269434402/pdf/839020NWP0Box382108B00PULBIC00no4.pdf
20. Deutsch, R. (2009) Indonesia, Reconstruction of Aceh Land Administration System (RALAS) Project, Project Implementation and Beneficiary Assessment, 2008. prepared for Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN)
21. World Bank Media Release, June 4 2005, Indonesia Starting $28.5 Million Aceh Land Rights Project
22. Indonesia: Land titles in Aceh - So much hope, but more action needed, December 2, 2006, Relief Web https://reliefweb.int/report/indonesia/indonesia-land-titles-aceh-so-much-hope-more-action-needed
23. A Joint Report of The BRR and International Partners, December 2005, ACEH AND NIAS ONE YEAR AFTER THE TSUNAMI The Recovery Effort and Way Forward
24. "TSUNAMI SPECIAL ENVOY BILL CLINTON TELLS ECOSOC MOST CHALLENGING DAYS LAY AHEAD IN RECOVERY, DISASTER PREVENTION, APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases".
25. "Third UN Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction opens with welcome news for the Pacific islands | Pacific Environment". www.sprep.org. Retrieved 2020-07-28.
26. UNISDR (18 May 2017). "Words into Action guidelines: Build back better in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction". UNISDR. Retrieved 19 January 2020.
27. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2017). Build Back Better in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. Consultative version (PDF) (Report). Retrieved 2020-08-29.
28. JICA, May 2015, https://www.jica.go.jp/english/jica_ri/publication/booksandreports/post_15.html
29. World Reconstruction Conference 4, Session 1b, BBB in Infrastructure: Making it Stronger and Accessible to Everyone, May 14, 2019 Geneva, Switzerland, https://www.gfdrr.org/en/events/WRC4/session1b
30. Bell, KC, Keynote 2016 FIG Working Week, May 2016, Christchurch, https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2016/ppt/PS02/Bell_ppt.pdf
31. Stephane Hallegatte, Jun Rentschler, Brian Walsh, World Bank GFDRR, 2018, Building Back Better: Achieving resilience through stronger, faster, and more inclusive post-disaster reconstruction, https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/Building%20Back%20Better.pdf
32. World Reconstruction Conference 4, Session 1b, BBB in Infrastructure: Making it Stronger and Accessible to Everyone, May 14, 2019 Geneva, Switzerland, https://www.gfdrr.org/en/events/WRC4/session1b
33. Beck, A., V. Evtimov and K.C. Bell, Land Administration and Geospatial Information Hard Talk: A Critical Evaluation, Coordinates, December 2023, https://mycoordinates.org/land-administration-and-geospatial-information-hard-talk-a-critical-evaluation/
34. Kramer, Randall; Richter, Daniel D.; Pattanayak, Subhrendu; Sharna, Narendra P. (March 1997). "Ecological and Economic Analysis of Watershed Protection in Eastern Madagascar". Journal of Environmental Management. 49 (3): 277–295. doi:10.1006/jema.1995.0085.
35. Price, Gareth; Bhatt, Mihir. "The role of the affected state in humanitarian action: A case study on India" (PDF). Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved 19 January 2020.
36. "Guidance Notes on Recovery: Environment" (PDF). International Recovery Platform. Retrieved 19 January 2020.
37. Stephane Hallegatte, Jun Rentschler, Brian Walsh, World Bank GFDRR, 2018, Building Back Better: Achieving resilience through stronger, faster, and more inclusive post-disaster reconstruction, https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/Building%20Back%20Better.pdf
38. World Reconstruction Conference 4, Session 1b, BBB in Infrastructure: Making it Stronger and Accessible to Everyone, May 14, 2019 Geneva, Switzerland, https://www.gfdrr.org/en/events/WRC4/session1b
39. https://www.electronic-sirens.com/why-the-warning-system-in-indonesia-failed-during-earthquake-and-tsunami/#:~:text=Indonesia%20have%20an%20advanced%20tsunami,while%20others%20have%20been%20stolen
40. Indonesia's Tsunami Warning System Hasn't Been Operational Since 2012, Oct 1 2018, Popular Mechanics, https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/a23553239/indonesias-tsunami-warning-system-non-operational/
41. World Bank GFDRR, RESULTS IN RESILIENCE: INDONESIA - CENTRAL SULAWESI EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI, October 2020, https://www.gfdrr.org/en/feature-story/results-resilience-indonesia-central-sulawesi-earthquake-and-tsunami
42. Shahnaz Arshad and Sohaib Athar, (2013), Rural Housing Reconstruction Program Post-2005 Earthquake Learning from the Pakistan Experience A Manual for Post-Disaster Housing Program Managers, World Bank GFDRR, Publication 77907, May 2013, https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/RHRP_PAKISTAN_WEB.pdf
43. "Former US President Clinton appointed UN special envoy for Haiti". UN News. 2009-05-19. Retrieved 2020-10-14.
44. "Haiti: UN launches largest-ever appeal for natural disaster". UN News. 2010-02-18. Retrieved 2020-10-14.
45. Haiti Earthquake Reconstruction Knowledge Notes from DRM Global Expert Team for the Government of Haiti, 2011, World Bank GFDRR, https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/GFDRR_Haiti_Reconstruction_KnowledgeNotes_0.pdf
46. Hadad-Zervos, F and John Roome, Nepal’s Journey to Green, Resilient, and Inclusive Development, Dec 16, 2021, World Bank, https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/endpovertyinsouthasia/nepals-journey-green-resilient-and-inclusive-development
47. Nepal Disaster Report, 2019, Ministry of Home Affairs, http://drrportal.gov.np/uploads/document/1594.pdf
48. JICA (2012). The Great East Japan Earth quake [sic] - Assistance from around the world (PDF) (Report). Retrieved 2020-08-29.
49. Government of the Philippines (2013). "Reconstruction Assistance on Yolanda (RAY)" . Retrieved 2020-08-29.
50. Mannakkara S, Wilkinson, S, Potangaroa, R, Resilient Post-Disaster Recovery Through Building Back Better, Routledge, 2019
51. Swamy, Raja. 2021. Building Back Better in India: Development, NGOs, and Artisanal Fishers after the 2004 Tsunami. NGOgraphies. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.
52. Bell, KC and V. Evtimov, University of Melbourne, Taylor and Francis, 2021, Chapter 4, Land Administration and Authoritative Geospatial Information: Lessons from Disasters to Support Building Resilience to Pandemics, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781003181590/covid-19-pandemic-geospatial-information-community-resilience?refId=316a95ff-aa78-410a-bab3-9b0232dc5f7e&context=ubx