Classical realism (international relations)

Last updated
Statue of Niccolo Machiavelli Machivelli.jpg
Statue of Niccolò Machiavelli

Classical realism is an international relations theory from the realist school of thought. [1] Realism makes the following assumptions: states are the main actors in the international relations system, there is no supranational international authority, states act in their own self-interest, and states want power for self-preservation. [2] Classical realism differs from other forms of realism in that it places specific emphasis on human nature and domestic politics as the key factor in explaining state behavior and the causes of inter-state conflict. [3] [4] Classical realist theory adopts a pessimistic view of human nature and argues that humans are not inherently benevolent but instead they are self-interested and act out of fear or aggression. [5] Furthermore, it emphasizes that this human nature is reflected by states in international politics due to international anarchy.[ citation needed ]

Contents

Classical realism first arose in its modern form during the interwar period of (1918-1939) as the academic field of international relations began to grow during this era. [2] Classical realism during the inter-war period developed as a response to the prominence of idealist and utopian theories in international relations during the time. [6] Liberal scholars at the time attributed conflict to poor social conditions and political systems whilst, prominent policy makers focused on establishing a respected body of international law and institutions to manage the international system. These ideas were critiqued by realists during the 1930s. After World War II, classical realism became more popular in academic and foreign policy settings. [2] E. H. Carr, George F. Kennan, Hans Morgenthau, Raymond Aron, and Robert Gilpin are central contributors to classical realism. [7]

During the 1960s and 70s classical realist theories declined in popularity and became less prominent as structural realist (neorealist) theorists argued against using human nature as a basis of analysis and instead proposed that explaining inter-state conflict through the anarchic structure of the international system was more empirical. [8] In contrast to neorealism, classical realism argues that the structure of the international system (e.g. anarchy) shapes the kinds of behaviors that states can engage in but does not determine state behavior. [3] In contrast to neorealism, classical realists do not hold that states' main goal is survival. [3] State behavior is ultimately uncertain and contingent. [3]

Theoretical origins

Classical realist writers have drawn from the ideas of earlier political thinkers, most notably, Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes and Thucydides. [9] [10] These political theorists are not considered to be a part of the modern classical realism school of thought, but their writings are considered important to the development of the theory. These thinkers are sometimes evoked to demonstrate the "timelessness" of realist thought; scholars have disputed to what extent these thinkers adhered to realist views. [11]

Thucydides

Thucydides was an ancient Athenian historian (460BC to 400BC). [12] Thucydides works contains significant parallels with the writings of classical realists. [7] In the Melian Dialogue, Thucydides critiques moralistic arguments made by states by arguing that it is instead self-interest and state power which motivate states and that idealistic arguments disguise this. [6] His writings have been a significant topic for debate in the international relations field. [13] Scholarly interest in Thucydides peaked during the Cold War as International Relations scholars made comparisons between the bi-polarity of the US and Russia and his account of the conflict between Athens and Sparta. Rusten describes Thucydides influence on international relations as "after the Second World War, Thucydides was read by many American opinion-makers (and by those academics who taught them) as a prototypical cold war policy analyst." [14]

Niccolo Machiavelli

Niccolò Machiavelli was a political theorist and diplomat in the Republic of Florence (1469-1527). [15] His work diverged from the traditions of political theory during his time. [16] In his text the Prince he advocated for a separation of morals and politics whilst, at the time political theory was heavily influenced by religious ideals. Machiavelli also argues that people should view things as they are, not how they should be, and justified the use of power as a means of achieving an end. Machiavelli's writings have been prominent in western political science and this has extended to the international relations field where his writings have been the source of liberal and realist debate. [17]

Thomas Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes was an English political philosopher (1588-1679). [18] Hobbes' major focus was not on international relations but he influenced classical realist theory through his descriptions of human nature, theories of the state and anarchy and his focus on politics as a contest for power. [6] Hobbes' theory of the "international state of nature" stems from his concept that a world without a government leads to anarchy. [19] This expands upon Hobbes' concept of the "state of nature," which is a hypothetical scenario about how people lived before societies were formed and the role of societies in placing restrictions upon natural rights or freedoms to create order and potential peace. Due to the lack of an international society the international system is therefore understood to be permanently anarchic. Michael Smith describes the significance of this theory to realism as "[Hobbes'] state of nature remains the defining feature of realist thought. His notion of the international state of nature as a state of war is shared by virtually everyone calling himself a realist." [20]

Assumptions and theories

As many of the 20th century figures associated with classical realism were strongly influenced by historians and/or sought to influence policymakers, works in classical realism tended to point to a multiplicity of causes for a wide range of outcomes, as well as cross analytical levels of analysis. [21] [22] [11]

Human nature

Classical realist theory explains international relations through assumptions about human nature. [4] The theory is pessimistic about human behaviour and emphasizes that individuals are primarily motivated by self-interest and not higher moral or ethical aspirations. The behavior of states is theorized to be dictated by basic primal emotions, [23] for example Thomas Hobbes described fear or aggression as fundamental motivations. [5] Human nature is not seen to be changeable but only controllable when placed within societal boundaries. [4] Classical realism takes a pessimistic view of human nature but the exact form this takes is debated as some classical realists focus on self-interest and a desire for survival as the primary aspects of human nature whilst, others believe in humans being inherently cruel, egoistic and savage. [9]

Classical realists believe that their pessimistic vision of human nature is reflected in politics and international relations. [4] Hans Morgenthau in his book Politics Among Nations states that "politics is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature." [24] The theory emphasizes that international relations are shaped by the tendencies of human nature since is not changeable but only controllable by a higher power such as the state implementing order. [4] Due to the anarchic international system, which means that there is no central power in the international system, states are unrestrained due to a lack of order and are free to express their human nature as a result. [5]

Understanding of the state

Classical realist theory views the state as the most significant unit of analysis and understands it to be more ontologically significant than the structure of the international system. [25] Classical realist theory attributes significant agency to state actors and believes that as states change so does the international system. This contrasts neo-realist theory which argues that the structure of the international system is ontologically superior and views states as unitary meaning they are seen as rational actors objectively pursuing their national interest. Classical realists do not view states as unitary and recognise that they are shaped by state to society relationships as well as international norms; due to this conception of the state they do not regard state actions as inherently rational pursuits of the national interest.

When analyzing the international system, classical realists differentiate between revisionist states and status quo states. [26] This means that they attempt to understand which states are striving to create a new international order how this affects the international security and translates into acts of aggression or causes of war. This contrasts neo-realist theory which has a unitary view of states and therefore does not account for the role of revisionism in accounting for state aggression in the international system.[ citation needed ]

State pursuit of power

Classical realists explain state conflict and the pursuit of power by suggesting they are result of human nature. [27] It is theorized that within human nature there is a lust for power which drives states to accumulate it where possible. [5] States are not just motivated to pursue power for the sake of security and survival, but may also be motivated by fear, honor, and glory or just pursue power for its own sake. [3] [28] [7]

States are understood to be a reflection of human nature and the anarchic international system is not considered to be the root cause of the pursuit of power but instead a facilitating factor. In regards to explaining states pursuit of power, classical realism is distinct as later theories places less emphasis on assumptions about human nature but instead focuses on the structure of the international system. [29] Neorealist scholars argue that states seek security and explain the pursuit of power as a means of creating security which contrasts classical realist theory. [30]

Modern International relations scholars have noted that classical realists debated about the extent to which the pursuit of power is an inherent biological drive as opposed to power being a method of self-preservation. [4]

Balance of power

The balance of power is a key analytical tool used by realist theory. [31] There are two key aspects to the balance of power in classical realism: [32] Firstly, a balance of power is understood to be an unintentional result of great power competition which occurs due to a constant pursuit of power by multiple states to dominate others leading to balance. Secondly, the balance of power is also understood as the efforts of states to create an equilibrium through the use of ideational or material forces such as alliances. Realists view a balance of power as desirable as it creates an inability to be dominated by another state and therefore provides security as it is less likely that states will engage in conflict or war that they cannot win.

Realists also theorise that the balance of power leads to the "security dilemma." [33] The security dilemma is the scenario in which one state increases its power in order to defend themselves and create security, but this prompts other states to increase their power leading to a spiralling effect where both sides are drawn into continually increasing their defence capabilities despite not desiring conflict. Classical realists often place a focus on the inevitability of this process due to the focus on a pessimistic understanding of human nature as egotistic leading states to constantly desire power. [34] This contrasts neo-realists who emphasise that the security dilemma is not inevitable but instead often a self-fulfilling prophecy. [35]

Hans Morgenthau's "Six Principles of Political Realism"

The second edition of Hans Morgenthau's book Politics Among Nations features the section "The Six Principles of Political Realism." [24] [36] The significance of Hans Morgenthau to international relations and classical realism was described by Thompson in 1959 as "much of the literature in international politics is a dialogue, explicit or not, between Morgenthau and his critics." [37] Morgenthau's six principles of political realism (paraphrased) are that: [24] International politics is governed by the laws derived from human nature. [4] Realism analyses power and power allows the pursuit of national interest meaning that the national interest is defined as power. [38] Realism acknowledges the moral significance of political action but recognises the necessity for immorality in successful politics. [39] Political realism does not identify the morals of a particular nation with universal morals.

Key debates

Idealism and realism

During the 1920s and 1930s the "first great debate" in international relations between realists and idealists occurred. [40] Some modern historians however dispute the claim and instead suggest that this oversimplifies a wider ranging series of discussions. [41] In the interwar period liberalism was the dominant paradigm in international relations theory but this was contested by classical realist theorists. [4] The publication of E. H. Carr's The Twenty Years' Crisis is seen to be central to the arguments of classical realism during this time period. [6] Carr argued against Utopian and Idealist views on international relations as well as the merit and success of the League of Nations. Following World War 2 and the inability for the international relations system to prevent war, many[ who? ] saw this as a victory for realist theory.

Neorealism and classical realism

During the 1960s and 1970s the "second great debate" of international relations occurred. [42] Following the behavioral revolution scholars began to place a new emphasis on creating a more empirical methodology for analyzing international relations. Neorealist scholars criticized how classical realist scholars had created methodologies which lacked the standards of proof to be considered scientific theories. [43] Classical realists had emphasized human nature as the primary form of explaining the international system; neo-realists emphasized the international structure instead. Kenneth Waltz's Theory of International Politics was a critical text in this debate as it argued that international anarchy was a core element of international politics. [9] After this era classical realist doctrines became less prominent in favor of neo-realism. [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thucydides</span> 5th-century BC Athenian historian and general

Thucydides was an Athenian historian and general. His History of the Peloponnesian War recounts the fifth-century BC war between Sparta and Athens until the year 411 BC. Thucydides has been dubbed the father of "scientific history" by those who accept his claims to have applied strict standards of impartiality and evidence-gathering and analysis of cause and effect, without reference to intervention by the gods, as outlined in his introduction to his work.

Neorealism or structural realism is a theory of international relations that emphasizes the role of power politics in international relations, sees competition and conflict as enduring features and sees limited potential for cooperation. The anarchic state of the international system means that states cannot be certain of other states' intentions and their security, thus prompting them to engage in power politics.

Realpolitik is the approach of conducting diplomatic or political policies based primarily on considerations of given circumstances and factors, rather than strictly following ideological, moral, or ethical premises. In this respect, it shares aspects of its philosophical approach with those of realism and pragmatism. It is often simply referred to as pragmatism in politics, e.g. "pursuing pragmatic policies" or "realistic policies".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International relations</span> Study of relationships between two or more states

International relations (IR) are the interactions among sovereign states. The scientific study of those interactions is also referred to as international studies, international politics, or international affairs. In a broader sense, the study of IR, in addition to multilateral relations, concerns all activities among states—such as war, diplomacy, trade, and foreign policy—as well as relations with and among other international actors, such as intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs), international legal bodies, and multinational corporations (MNCs). There are several schools of thought within IR, of which the most prominent are realism, liberalism, and constructivism.

International relations theory is the study of international relations (IR) from a theoretical perspective. It seeks to explain behaviors and outcomes in international politics. The four most prominent schools of thought are realism, liberalism, constructivism, and rational choice. Whereas realism and liberalism make broad and specific predictions about international relations, constructivism and rational choice are methodological approaches that focus on certain types of social explanation for phenomena.

In international relations, power is defined in several different ways. Material definitions of state power emphasize economic and military power. Other definitions of power emphasize the ability to structure and constitute the nature of social relations between actors. Power is an attribute of particular actors in their interactions, as well as a social process that constitutes the social identities and capacities of actors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans Morgenthau</span> American political scientist (1904–1980)

Hans Joachim Morgenthau was a German-American jurist and political scientist who was one of the major 20th-century figures in the study of international relations. Morgenthau's works belong to the tradition of realism in international relations theory; he is usually considered among the most influential realists of the post-World War II period. Morgenthau made landmark contributions to international relations theory and the study of international law. His Politics Among Nations, first published in 1948, went through five editions during his lifetime and was widely adopted as a textbook in U.S. universities. While Morgenthau emphasized the centrality of power and "the national interest," the subtitle of Politics Among Nations—"the struggle for power and peace"—indicates his concern not only with the struggle for power but also with the ways in which it is limited by ethical and legal norms.

The national interest is a sovereign state's goals and ambitions, taken to be the aim of government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kenneth Waltz</span> American political scientist (1924–2013)

Kenneth Neal Waltz was an American political scientist who was a member of the faculty at both the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University and one of the most prominent scholars in the field of international relations. He was a veteran of both World War II and the Korean War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International security</span> Measures taken by states and international organizations to ensure mutual safety and survival

International security is a term which refers to the measures taken by states and international organizations, such as the United Nations, European Union, and others, to ensure mutual survival and safety. These measures include military action and diplomatic agreements such as treaties and conventions. International and national security are invariably linked. International security is national security or state security in the global arena.

Idealism in the foreign policy context holds that a nation-state should make its internal political philosophy the goal of its conduct and rhetoric in international affairs. For example, an idealist might believe that ending poverty at home should be coupled with tackling poverty abroad. Both within and outside of the United States, American president Woodrow Wilson is widely considered an early advocate of idealism and codifier of its practical meaning; specific actions cited include the issuing of the famous "Fourteen Points".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Realism (international relations)</span> Belief that world politics is always and necessarily a field of conflict among actors pursuing power

Realism, a dominant school of thought in international relations theory, is a theoretical framework that sees the global system as lacking a centralized authority, leading to a state of anarchy. It centers on states as primary actors, driven by rational self-interest and navigating a system shaped by power politics, national interest, and a pursuit of security and self-preservation.

In international relations (IR), constructivism is a social theory that asserts that significant aspects of international relations are shaped by ideational factors. The most important ideational factors are those that are collectively held; these collectively held beliefs construct the interests and identities of actors.

Offensive realism is a structural theory in international relations that belongs to the neorealist school of thought and was put forward by the political scholar John Mearsheimer in response to defensive realism. Offensive realism holds that the anarchic nature of the international system is responsible for the promotion of aggressive state behavior in international politics. The theory fundamentally differs from defensive realism by depicting great powers as power-maximizing revisionists privileging buck-passing and self-promotion over balancing strategies in their consistent aim to dominate the international system. The theory brings important alternative contributions for the study and understanding of international relations but remains the subject of criticism.

Robert Gilpin was an American political scientist. He was Professor of Politics and International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University where he held the Eisenhower professorship.

In international relations theory, the concept of anarchy is the idea that the world lacks any supreme authority or sovereignty. In an anarchic state, there is no hierarchically superior, coercive power that can resolve disputes, enforce law, or order the system of international politics. In international relations, anarchy is widely accepted as the starting point for international relations theory.

The English School of international relations theory maintains that there is a 'society of states' at the international level, despite the condition of anarchy. The English school stands for the conviction that ideas, rather than simply material capabilities, shape the conduct of international politics, and therefore deserve analysis and critique. In this sense it is similar to constructivism, though the English School has its roots more in world history, international law and political theory, and is more open to normative approaches than is generally the case with constructivism.

Defensive neorealism is a structural theory in international relations that is derived from the school of neorealism. The theory finds its foundation in the political scientist Kenneth Waltz's Theory of International Politics in which Waltz argues that the anarchical structure of the international system encourages states to maintain moderate and reserved policies to attain national security. In contrast, offensive realism assumes that states seek to maximize their power and influence to achieve security through domination and hegemony. Defensive neorealism asserts that aggressive expansion as promoted by offensive neorealists upsets the tendency of states to conform to the balance of power theory, thereby decreasing the primary objective of the state, which they argue to be the ensuring of its security. Defensive realism denies neither the reality of interstate conflict or that incentives for state expansion exist, but it contends that those incentives are sporadic, rather than endemic. Defensive neorealism points towards "structural modifiers," such as the security dilemma and geography, and elite beliefs and perceptions to explain the outbreak of conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Complex interdependence</span>

Complex interdependence in international relations and international political economy is a concept put forth by Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye in the 1970s to describe the emerging nature of the global political economy. The concept entails that relations between states are becoming increasingly deep and complex. These increasingly complex webs of economic interdependence undermine state power and elevate the influence of transnational non-state actors. These complex relationships can be explored through both the liberal and realism lenses and can later explain the debate of power from complex interdependence.

<i>Scientific Man versus Power Politics</i> 1946 book by Hans Morgenthau

Scientific Man versus Power Politics is a 1946 work by realist academic Hans Morgenthau. The book contains Morgenthau's most systematic exposition of a realist philosophy and a critique of a position he terms 'liberal rationalism'. Morgenthau argues that liberalism's belief in human reason had been shown to be deficient because of the rise of Nazi Germany and that emphasis on science and reason as routes to peace meant that states were losing touch with historic traditions of statecraft. The work marked out Morgenthau as the pre-eminent modern exponent of a Hobbesian view of human nature in international relations scholarship. Despite the contemporary association between (neo)realism and positivism Scientific Man has been considered a critique of attempts to place politics on a 'scientific' footing in works such as Charles Merriam's New Aspects of Politics.

References

  1. ↑ Kirshner, Jonathan (2022). An Unwritten Future: Realism and Uncertainty in World Politics. Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-16677-3.[ page needed ]
  2. 1 2 3 Reus-Smit, Christian; Snidal, Duncan, eds. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.001.0001. ISBN   978-0-19-921932-2.[ page needed ]
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Kirshner, Jonathan (January 2015). "The Economic Sins of Modern IR Theory and the Classical Realist Alternative". World Politics. 67 (1): 155–183. doi:10.1017/S0043887114000318. JSTOR   24578341. S2CID   146756741.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Donnelly, Jack (2000). Realism and International Relations. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511612510. ISBN   978-0-521-59229-1.[ page needed ]
  5. 1 2 3 4 Williams, Michael (2007). Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations. OUP Oxford. ISBN   978-0-19-153716-5.[ page needed ]
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Korab-Karpowicz, W. Julian (2018). "Political Realism in International Relations". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  7. 1 2 3 Kirshner, Jonathan (2022). "What Is Classical Realism? Thucydides and His Descendants". An Unwritten Future: Realism and Uncertainty in World Politics. Princeton University Press. pp. 13–42. doi:10.1515/9780691233123-004. ISBN   978-0-691-16677-3. JSTOR   j.ctv2hvfj4k.6. Project MUSE   chapter 3230109.
  8. ↑ Schuett, Robert (April 2010). "Classical realism, Freud and human nature in international relations". History of the Human Sciences. 23 (2): 21–46. doi:10.1177/0952695110361421. S2CID   145112792.
  9. 1 2 3 Boucher, David (1998). Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-878054-0.[ page needed ]
  10. ↑ Lebow, Richard Ned (2016). "Classical Realism". International Relations Theories. doi:10.1093/hepl/9780198707561.003.0003. ISBN   978-0-19-870756-1.
  11. 1 2 Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–17. ISBN   978-0-521-53475-8.
  12. ↑ Rhodes, P. J. (2015). Thucydides. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN   978-1-4725-2207-8.[ page needed ]
  13. ↑ Lebow, Richard Ned (2003). The Tragic Vision of Politics. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491504. ISBN   978-0-521-82753-9.[ page needed ]
  14. ↑ Rusten, Jeffrey S. (2009). Thucydides. OUP Oxford. pp. 434–435. ISBN   978-0-19-157039-1.
  15. ↑ Mansfield, H. 2020. Niccolò Machiavelli. Encyclopedia of Britannica, April 29, 2020. Accessed May 25, 2020
  16. ↑ Vatter, ME 2013, Machiavelli's The Prince : a reader's guide , Bloomsbury Academic, London
  17. ↑ Whelan, Frederick G. (2004). Hume and Machiavelli: Political Realism and Liberal Thought. Lexington Books. ISBN   978-0-7391-0631-0.[ page needed ]
  18. ↑ Duncan, Stewart, "Thomas Hobbes", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta. Accessed 29 May 2019.
  19. ↑ Williams, Michael C. (1996). "Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration". International Organization. 50 (2): 213–236. doi:10.1017/S002081830002854X. JSTOR   2704077. S2CID   145441313.
  20. ↑ Smith, M. 1986. Realist thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press p.13
  21. ↑ Parent, Joseph M.; Baron, Joshua M. (June 2011). "Elder Abuse: How the Moderns Mistreat Classical Realism1: Elder Abuse". International Studies Review. 13 (2): 193–213. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01021.x.
  22. ↑ Brown, Chris (July 2012). "Realism: rational or reasonable?". International Affairs. 88 (4): 857–866. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01105.x. JSTOR   23255622.
  23. ↑ Edinger, Harald (15 December 2021). "Theory of Irrational Politics: Classical Realist Lessons on Foreign Policy Analysis". International Studies Review. 23 (4): 1181–1207. doi: 10.1093/isr/viaa095 .
  24. 1 2 3 Morgenthau, Hans J, 1948. "Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace." New York: A.A. Knopf,. Print.[ page needed ]
  25. ↑ Hobson, John M. (2000). The State and International Relations. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-64391-7.[ page needed ]
  26. ↑ Schweller, Randall L. (March 1996). "Neorealism's status‐quo bias: What security dilemma?". Security Studies. 5 (3): 90–121. doi:10.1080/09636419608429277.
  27. ↑ Brown, Chris (1997). Understanding International Relations. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25487-3. ISBN   978-0-333-66830-6.[ page needed ]
  28. ↑ Lebow, Richard Ned (2003). "The wisdom of classical realism". The Tragic Vision of Politics. pp. 257–309. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491504.008. ISBN   978-0-521-82753-9.
  29. ↑ Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-53475-8.[ page needed ]
  30. ↑ Waltz, Kenneth Neal (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. ISBN   978-0-201-08349-1.
  31. ↑ Buzan, B, 1997. "The Timeless Wisdom of Realism?". In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski, pp. 47-65. London: Cambridge University Press.
  32. ↑ Little, R. 2007. Hans J. Morgenthau's Politics Among Nations. In The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models (pp. 91-127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. ↑ Diez, Thomas; Bode, Ingvild; Da Costa, Aleksandra (2011). "Security Dilemma". Key Concepts in International Relations. doi:10.4135/9781446288344. ISBN   978-1-4129-2848-9.
  34. ↑ H. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 6th ed. (New York: McGraw Hill [1948] 1985).
  35. ↑ Tang, Shiping (18 September 2009). "The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis". Security Studies. 18 (3): 587–623. doi: 10.1080/09636410903133050 . S2CID   54581711.
  36. ↑ Cristol, Jonathan (11 August 2009). "Morgenthau vs. Morgenthau? 'The Six Principles of Political Realism' in Context". American Foreign Policy Interests. 31 (4): 238–244. doi:10.1080/10803920903136247. S2CID   143472250.
  37. ↑ Thompson, Kenneth W. (1959). "American Approaches to International Politics". In Keeton, George W. (ed.). The Year Book of World Affairs. Stevens. pp. 205–235.
  38. ↑ Rösch, Felix (April 2014). "Pouvoir, puissance, and politics: Hans Morgenthau's dualistic concept of power?" (PDF). Review of International Studies. 40 (2): 349–365. doi:10.1017/S0260210513000065. S2CID   143514064.
  39. ↑ Murray, A. J. H. (1996). "The Moral Politics of Hans Morgenthau". The Review of Politics. 58 (1): 81–108. doi:10.1017/S0034670500051676. S2CID   182840843.
  40. ↑ Schmidt, Brian, ed. (2013). International Relations and the First Great Debate. doi:10.4324/9780203120118. ISBN   978-1-136-31912-9.[ page needed ]
  41. ↑ Ashworth, Lucian M. (April 2002). "Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? a Revisionist History of International Relations". International Relations. 16 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1177/0047117802016001004. S2CID   143497248.
  42. ↑ Vasquez, John A, 1998. The Power of Power Politics: from Classical Realism to Neo-traditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Print.
  43. ↑ Brown, Chris (June 2009). "Structural Realism, Classical Realism and Human Nature" (PDF). International Relations. 23 (2): 257–270. doi:10.1177/0047117809104638. S2CID   145436757.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.