Community-based economics

Last updated

Community-based economics or community economics is an economic system that encourages local substitution. It is similar to the lifeways of those practicing voluntary simplicity, including traditional Mennonite, Amish, and modern eco-village communities. It is also a subject in urban economics, related to moral purchasing and local purchasing. [1]

Contents

The community-based economy can refer to the various initiatives coordinated through multiple forms of interactions. These interactions may involve some form of work performance; project participation; and/or relationship exchange. The forms of interaction can exclude the need to contract; can do away with the need to include some form of monetisation; as well as be free from the need to establish a structure of hierarchy. Community-based economies have been seen to involve aspects of social bonding; value promotion; and establishing community-orientated social goals. [2]

It has been suggested that communities that meet their own needs need the global economy less. "Local-economy theory" introduces insights into new economic development that honours ecological realities and finds efficiencies in small-scale, shared knowledge at the community level. [3]

Community-based economies have been seen to focus on the idea that the “local community should be the focal point of development”. In addition, resources and skills which are sourced locally are seen to play a pivotal role in the community. [4] A community economies approach is interested in diverse activities that contribute to the well-being of both people and the planet. Such actions seek to help people survive well; produce and distribute surplus; transact goods and services more fairly; and invest in ways to support a better future. A community economies approach involves identifying and acknowledging the economic activities that contribute to the well-being of people and the planet and considers ways that these activities may strengthen and multiply. Community-based economics starts by acknowledging the local context and valuing the diverse economic activities and possibilities already present. [5]

In the Philippines, the Jenga Community Partnering Project involved working with groups of community members to build on existing individual and community assets. Community economies researchers point out that the 'community' in community economies is not about pre-existing communities (such as those based on a shared identity or location). Instead, the community is a process of being with others, including the world around. [5]

Investment and poverty alleviation

Community-based development is a form of decentralisation that "devolves authority to the most local community level". Economic development projects target the poor, often in developing countries. [6] There have been mixed results from a limited number of studies endeavouring to explore the potential for success from community-based decentralised programs. [7] The World Bank is on record to have increased funding for community-based development from a minimum of $325 million in 1996 to a minimum of $3 billion in 2003.

Community approaches to poverty reduction address social problems that governments and the voluntary sector usually address. However, these typically incorporate methods employed by the private sector. [8]

Community-based tourism (CBT) has been advanced as a strategy associated with community development and poverty alleviation through tourism. CBT "has become one of the sector's fastest-growing segments globally...". It is a form of tourism that started in the 1970s and is explicitly aimed at disadvantaged communities. [9] Common challenges are linked to the scarcity of material and non-material (such as skill and education) of poor community members.

China

In 2001, China began a community-driven program for the purpose of reducing poverty levels. “Participatory village planning” was seen to have been used to promote public investments in targeted villages with higher levels of poverty. There had been programs prior to 2001 in China where investments were made to try to reduce poverty, however, these did not include much participation from the communities themselves. In the current program, each village conducts a public investment plan where projects are voted on by the village residents themselves. The government-initiated program being run in China since 2001 is one of few examples of community-based economics at play, with limited to no participation from international donors. [6]

Nepal

Cooperatives play a vital role in community-based poverty reduction programs. The first multipurpose cooperative in Nepal was established in 1956. [10] The purpose of establishing the cooperative was to help support the rehabilitation of flood victims.

United States

The Amish community are an example of economic development being possible without complete modernisation. Profit is given less importance to religion and its values. [11] Farmers in the Amish community refrain from using modern technological equipment and still find ways to sell their products at market prices and make profits. [12] By engaging in the wider economy, the Amish community are better able to deal with population growth, land price increases, as well as rises in costs of goods and services not being produced by the Amish community itself. As such, the Amish still find themselves subject to the economic factors of supply and demand changes, rapid changes in legal and political environments, as well the impacts of globalisation.

Environmental sustainability and natural resource preservation

Due to the hybrid nature of many community-based natural resource management approaches, governance actors from higher than just the local community level are often involved. As such, approaches can differ widely with respect to the composition of participants. Different governance functions can be performed by different actors from different societal spheres and at different levels. [13]

Community-based approaches may overlook or neglect broader social processes. Some communities may be too poor or conflict-ridden to be able to help themselves; 'participation fatigue' can be present, and power differentials can lead to inequitable outcomes. [14]

"Bioregional and ecological economics theory describes the growth of local economic linkages as vital to moving post-industrial economies toward sustainability". Growing economic links involves engaging local communities to the point where they have meaningful levels of ownership over their environmental and financial resources, in order to focus on the production of resources to meet localised needs. This pattern is becoming more familiar in many parts of North America and Europe. [3] As currently practised, Green Community Economic Development (GCED) schemes involve extending ideas to finance local economic initiatives. These initiatives feature energy and other conservation measures and environmental remediation as an essential job creation focus". [3]

Australia

Government agencies and community groups have protocols for engaging with Aboriginal communities. In regional Australia, resource management practitioners apply projects according to engagement protocols transferred from remote Australia. [15] Various state governments in Australia devolve powers to regional organisations to decide how to invest public funds in environmental management. [16] This model is an example of a community based economic approach to ecological management. This approach is one that the Australian state governments have justified based on the potential benefits of developing the capacities of landholders and other stakeholders. Stakeholders then respond self-reliantly (both as individuals and in groups) to the environmental challenges. [16]

Nepal

The state government of Nepal set up the Community Forestry programme in 1978, an initiative that saw community members being given full rights for the protection of forests. Around twenty thousand community forest user groups, including under two and a half million households are involved in the management of around two million hectares of community forest in Nepal. [17]

United States

In many rural communities across the west of the United States, (community-based organisations (CBO)), grassroots non-profit entities focusing on revitalising their respective communities through linked natural resource stewardship and rural economic development activities, have emerged to provide direction and practical solutions to natural resource management dilemmas and social conflict. [18] CBOs seek to help communities cope with policy and economic transitions.

Indigenous communities

Australia

Since the 1970s, Indigenous communities in Australia have played leading roles in building procuring community-based services in areas such as local governing; health; housing; as well as welfare. [19]

In Australia, a five-year research project called 'People on Country (POC), Healthy Landscapes and Indigenous Economic Futures' was undertaken by the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research at the Australian National University. [20] This project was collaborative in nature, where the University worked with a number of community-based Aboriginal land and sea management groups in northern Australia. Work was carried out on a number of cultural and resource management issues.

Malawi

Many community-based economies have been seen in the Kasungu district of Malawi. These economies have concerned themselves with the tasks of sustaining agriculture; managing natural resources; facilitating small and medium enterprises; as well as dealing with health problems in their communities such as HIV and AIDS. [21]

The Ngolowindo Horticultural Cooperative Society (NHCS) is one such example of community-based economies at play. It is located in the “Maganga Traditional Authority in the Salima District of Malawi's Central Regions”. The NHCS includes members from the eleven villages surrounding it and was initially known as the “Ngolowindo Self Help Irrigation Scheme (NSHIS)”. [4] The NSHIS had seen support from the areas’ indigenous leaders. Apart from seeking to implement subsistence farming, the NHCS deals with generational income issues by focusing on achieving stability at the household level. [4]

New Zealand

The importance of relationships was seen in the early Māori economy. Concepts such as reciprocity; flexibility; sustainability and sharing (trade) underpinned these relationships. Not only were these relationships regarded as between people, but between people and the physical world, as well as between people and the spiritual world. [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecotourism</span> Tourism visiting environments

Ecotourism is a form of tourism marketed as "responsible" travel to natural areas, conserving the environment, and improving the well-being of the local people. The stated purpose may be to educate the traveler, to provide funds for ecological conservation, to directly benefit the economic development and political empowerment of local communities, or to foster respect for different cultures and human rights.

In the broadest sense, cultural resource management (CRM) is the vocation and practice of managing heritage assets, and other cultural resources such as contemporary art. It incorporates Cultural Heritage Management which is concerned with traditional and historic culture. It also delves into the material culture of archaeology. Cultural resource management encompasses current culture, including progressive and innovative culture, such as urban culture, rather than simply preserving and presenting traditional forms of culture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural area</span> Geographic area that is located outside towns and cities

In general, a rural area or a countryside is a geographic area that is located outside towns and cities. Typical rural areas have a low population density and small settlements. Agricultural areas and areas with forestry are typically described as rural. Different countries have varying definitions of rural for statistical and administrative purposes.

The United Nations defines community development as "a process where community members come together to take collective action and generate solutions to common problems." It is a broad concept, applied to the practices of civic leaders, activists, involved citizens, and professionals to improve various aspects of communities, typically aiming to build stronger and more resilient local communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental resource management</span> Type of resource management

Environmental resource management is the management of the interaction and impact of human societies on the environment. It is not, as the phrase might suggest, the management of the environment itself. Environmental resources management aims to ensure that ecosystem services are protected and maintained for future human generations, and also maintain ecosystem integrity through considering ethical, economic, and scientific (ecological) variables. Environmental resource management tries to identify factors affected by conflicts that rise between meeting needs and protecting resources. It is thus linked to environmental protection, sustainability, integrated landscape management, natural resource management, fisheries management, forest management, and wildlife management, and others.

A social enterprise is an organization that applies commercial strategies to maximize improvements in financial, social and environmental well-being. This may include maximizing social impact alongside profits for co-owners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable tourism</span> Form of travel and tourism without damage to nature or cultural area

Sustainable tourism is a concept that covers the complete tourism experience, including concern for economic, social and environmental issues as well as attention to improving tourists' experiences and addressing the needs of host communities. Sustainable tourism should embrace concerns for environmental protection, social equity, and the quality of life, cultural diversity, and a dynamic, viable economy delivering jobs and prosperity for all. It has its roots in sustainable development and there can be some confusion as to what "sustainable tourism" means. There is now broad consensus that tourism should be sustainable. In fact, all forms of tourism have the potential to be sustainable if planned, developed and managed properly. Tourist development organizations are promoting sustainable tourism practices in order to mitigate negative effects caused by the growing impact of tourism, for example its environmental impacts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mount Everest Foundation</span>

Mount Everest Foundation is a non-political, non-sectarian, non-governmental, non-profit making humanitarian organization. MEF/Nepal is registered in the District Administration Office of Kathmandu under the Social Organization Act of His Majesty's Government of Nepal. The main focus of the Foundation is to encourage the Nepalese people to become more dynamic, viable, effective and self-reliant towards socio-economic development and the environment. The Mount Everest Foundation is not connected to, or to be confused with the UK-based not-for-profit organisation of the same name that provides funds for exploratory scientific and mountaineering expeditions across the globe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Natural resource management</span> Management of natural resources

Natural resource management (NRM) is the management of natural resources such as land, water, soil, plants and animals, with a particular focus on how management affects the quality of life for both present and future generations (stewardship).

Rural tourism is a tourism that focuses on actively participating in a rural lifestyle. It can be a variant of ecotourism. Many villages can facilitate tourism because many villagers are hospitable and eager to welcome or host visitors. Agriculture has become more mechanized and requires less manual labor. This trend is causing economic pressure on some villages, which in turn causes young people to move to urban areas. There is however, a segment of the urban population that is interested in visiting the rural areas and understanding the lifestyle.

Rural economics is the study of rural economies. Rural economies include both agricultural and non-agricultural industries, so rural economics has broader concerns than agricultural economics which focus more on food systems. Rural development and finance attempt to solve larger challenges within rural economics. These economic issues are often connected to the migration from rural areas due to lack of economic activities and rural poverty. Some interventions have been very successful in some parts of the world, with rural electrification and rural tourism providing anchors for transforming economies in some rural areas. These challenges often create rural-urban income disparities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Community forestry</span>

Community forestry is an evolving branch of forestry whereby the local community plays a significant role in forest management and land use decision making by themselves in the facilitating support of government as well as change agents. It involves the participation and collaboration of various stakeholders including community, government and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). The level of involvement of each of these groups is dependent on the specific community forest project, the management system in use and the region. It gained prominence in the mid-1970s and examples of community forestry can now be seen in many countries including Nepal, Indonesia, Korea, Brazil, India and North America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crawford School of Public Policy</span> School of Australian National University, Canberra

Crawford School of Public Policy is a research-intensive policy school within the ANU College of Asia and the Pacific at The Australian National University which focuses on Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. The school was named after Sir John Crawford, and its current director is Professor Helen Sullivan.

Responsible tourism is a relatively modern concept in the Kingdom of Thailand that took root in the late-1990s. It is underpinned by the belief that tourism should develop in a manner that minimizes negative impacts on local communities, and wherever possible ensure that a positive symbiosis exists between hosts and visitors. Responsible travel promotes a respect for indigenous culture, the minimization of the negative environmental impacts of tourism, active participation in volunteering to assist local communities, and the structuring of businesses to benefit the final service provider rather than an international agent.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to social science:

Traditionally, market orientation (MO) focuses on microenvironment and the functional management of an organisation. However, contemporary organisations have widened their focus to incorporate more roles, functions and emphasis on the macro environment. Firms have been concerned with short run success and often not taken into account the long-run ecological, social and economic effects from their activities. Despite growth in the MO concept, there is still a need to reconceptualise the concept with a greater emphasis on external factors that influence a firm.

Indigenous planning is an ideological approach to the field of regional planning where planning is done by Indigenous peoples for Indigenous communities. Practitioners integrate traditional knowledge or cultural knowledge into the process of planning. Indigenous planning recognizes that "all human communities plan" and that Indigenous communities have been carrying out their own community planning processes for thousands of years. While the broader context of urban planning, and social planning includes the need to work cooperatively with indigenous persons and organizations, the process in doing so is dependent on social, political and cultural forces.

Tourism impacts tourist destinations in both positive and negative ways, encompassing economic, political, socio-cultural, environmental, and psychological dimensions. The economic effects of tourism encompass improved tax revenue, personal income growth, enhanced living standards, and the creation of additional employment opportunities. Sociocultural impacts are associated with interactions between people with differing cultural backgrounds, attitudes and behaviors, and relationships to material goods. Tourism can also have significant political impacts by influencing government policies and promoting diplomatic relations between countries. Environmental impacts can be categorized as direct effects including environmental damage, wildlife destruction, deforestation, water pollution, and indirect effects, such as increased harvesting of natural resources to supply food, indirect air and water pollution. Tourism also has positive and negative health outcomes for local people. The short-term negative impacts of tourism on residents' health are related to the density of tourist's arrivals, the risk of disease transmission, road accidents, higher crime levels, as well as traffic congestion, crowding, and other stressful factors. In addition, residents can experience anxiety and depression related to their risk perceptions about mortality rates, food insecurity, contact with infected tourists, etc., which can result in negative mental health outcomes. At the same time, there are positive long-term impacts of tourism on residents' health and well-being outcomes through improving healthcare access positive emotions, novelty, and social interactions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental conflict</span> Social conflict caused by environmental factors

Environmental conflicts or ecological distribution conflicts (EDCs) are social conflicts caused by environmental degradation or by unequal distribution of environmental resources. The Environmental Justice Atlas documented 3,100 environmental conflicts worldwide as of April 2020 and emphasised that many more conflicts remained undocumented. Parties involved in these conflicts include locally affected communities, states, companies and investors, and social or environmental movements; typically environmental defenders are protecting their homelands from resource extraction or hazardous waste disposal. Resource extraction and hazardous waste activities often create resource scarcities, pollute the environment, and degrade the living space for humans and nature, resulting in conflict. A particular case of environmental conflicts are forestry conflicts, or forest conflicts which "are broadly viewed as struggles of varying intensity between interest groups, over values and issues related to forest policy and the use of forest resources". In the last decades, a growing number of these have been identified globally.

References

  1. ↑ Newman, Lynda Henry (1986). Community economic development : an approach for urban-based economies. [Winnipeg, Man., Canada]: Institute of Urban Studies. ISBN   0-920213-11-1.
  2. ↑ Acquier, Aurélien; Daudigeos, Thibault; Pinkse, Jonatan (2017). "Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 125: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006.
  3. 1 2 3 Perkins, Patricia (2003). "Social Diversity, Globalization and Sustainability in Community-Based Economics". Canadian Woman Studies. 23.
  4. 1 2 3 Hill, T R; Nel, E L; Illgner, P (2007). "Partnership for Success—Community-Based Economic Development: A Case Study of Ngolowindo Cooperative, Malawi". Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 25 (4): 573–590. doi:10.1068/c8p. S2CID   153414635.
  5. 1 2 Cameron, Jenny; Lyne, Isaac (2022). Community economies (1st ed.). Routledge. ISBN   9781003017653.
  6. 1 2 Park, Albert; Wang, Sangui (2010). "Community-based development and poverty alleviation: An evaluation of China's poor village investment program". Journal of Public Economics. 94 (9–10): 790–799. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.005. S2CID   18212353.
  7. ↑ Mansuri, Ghazala; Rao, Vijayendra (2004). "Community-Based and Driven Development: A Critical Review. Policy Research Working Paper; No.3209".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  8. ↑ Torjman, Sherri (1998). Community-Based Poverty Reduction. Canada: The Caledon Institute of Social Policy. p. 5. ISBN   1-895796-98-9.
  9. ↑ Giampiccoli, Andrea; Saayman, Melville (2017). "Giampiccoli, A., & Saayman, M. (2017). Community-based tourism, responsible tourism, and infrastructure development and poverty". African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure. 6 (2): 7.
  10. ↑ Bharadwaj, Bishal (2012). "Roles of Cooperatives in Poverty Reduction: A Case of Nepal". Administration and Management Review. 24 (1): 125.
  11. ↑ Dana, Léo-Paul (2007). "A Humility-Based Enterprising Community: The Amish People in Lancaster County". Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. 1 (2): 142–154. doi:10.1108/17506200710752566.
  12. ↑ Lutz, Martin (2017). "The Amish in the Market: Competing against the Odds". American Studies Journal. 63. doi:10.18422/63-03.
  13. ↑ Sattler, Claudia; Schröter, Barbara; Meyer, Angela; Giersch, Gregor; Meyer, Claas; Matzdorf, Bettina (2016). "Multilevel governance in community-based environmental management: a case study comparison from Latin America". Ecology and Society. 21 (4): 1. doi: 10.5751/ES-08475-210424 . hdl: 10535/10233 .
  14. ↑ Wismer, Susan; Mitchell, Bruce (2005). "Community-based Approaches to Resource and Environmental Management". Environments: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 33 (1): 1.
  15. ↑ Carter, Jennifer (2010). "Protocols, particularities, and problematising Indigenous 'engagement' in community-based environmental management in settled Australia". The Geographical Journal. 176 (3): 1. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00355.x.
  16. 1 2 Marshall, Graham R; McNeill, Judith; Reeve, I J (2011). "Economics for Accountability in Community-Based Environmental Governance".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  17. ↑ "Overall Gaps and Challenges of Community Based Enterprise in Community Forests in Nepal" (PDF). ICUN.org. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
  18. ↑ Abrams, Jesse; Davis, Emily J; Ellison, Autumn; Moseley, Cassandra; Nowell, Branda (2016). "Community-Based Organizations in the U.S. West: Status, Structure, and Activities" (PDF).{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. ↑ Morley, Sam (20 May 2015). "What works in effective Indigenous community-managed programs and organisations". Child Family Community Australia.
  20. ↑ Kerins, Seán; Jordan, Kirrily (2010). "Indigenous Economic Development through Community-Based Enterprise" (PDF). CAEPR Topical Issue No. 06/2010.
  21. ↑ Mgawanyemba, Gamaliel D (2008). "Community-based organizations in socio-economic development : the experience of Kasungu district in Malawi". UNISA Institutional Repository. hdl:10500/2759.
  22. ↑ Schulze, Hillmarè; Hurren, Konrad; Riley, Hannah. "Case Studies on Advancing Inclusive Economic Growth: Understanding and Valuing Indigenous Economies within APEC". APEC Secretariat.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.