Conservative Formula Investing

Last updated

Conservative formula investing is an investment technique that uses the principles of low-volatility investing and is enhanced with momentum and net payout yield signals.

Contents

Methodology

The Conservative formula based on 3 investment criteria: volatility, momentum and net payout yield.

  1. From the 1,000 largest stocks the 500 with the lowest historical 36-month stock return volatility are selected
  2. Using this subset, each stock is then ranked on its 12-1 month price momentum and net payout yield
  3. Thereafter, the momentum and net payout yield rankings (1 to 500) are averaged and the best 100 stocks are equally weighted in a final portfolio that is rebalanced on a quarterly basis

For more background, the Conservative Formula is discussed and replicated in an August 2022 Bloomberg webinar. [1] It is also included as a stock screener on Validea and ValueSignals. [2] [3] In addition, it can be replicated through the use of the code that is shared on Reddit and Medium. [4] [5]

Background

Similar to Joel Greenblatt's Magic Formula of Joel Greenblatt, the Conservative Formula is used as a stock screener that aims to beat the market. It is designed to achieve higher risk-adjusted returns in a systematic manner, by giving investors exposure to multiple investment factors using easily obtainable data. The formula is outlined in a book 'High Returns from Low Risk' which is written by Pim van Vliet and Jan de Koning. [6] It was published in 2016 and translated into Chinese, German, French, Spanish and Dutch. [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] It has also been empirically tested in an academic paper by David Blitz and Pim van Vliet which is publicly available on SSRN. [12] [13]

In 2019 and 2022 the Conservative Formula was applied to the Chinese A-share and Indian stock markets by independent researchers. [14] [15] It has also been discussed on multiple platforms including Alpha Architect, GuruFocus, La Vanguardia and ETF.com as well as reviewed on JD.com. [16] [17] [18] [19] [7]

US results

Based on a universe of US stocks, the Conservative Formula has produced an annualized return of 15.1% over the period January 1929 to December 2016, significantly outperforming the US market index by 5.8% per year. Moreover, this return has been achieved with lower volatility, resulting in a Sharpe ratio of 0.94 for the full sample period. The formula also delivered positive returns in each decade in this market.

The historical return series dating back to 1929 are publicly available and updated every year. [20] The figure shows the cumulative US dollar performance of Conservative versus Speculative (i.e., high volatility stocks with weak momentum and low net payout yields) stocks, including recent out-of-sample results.

Conservative Formula 1929-2020.png

International results

The Conservative Formula has also been applied to international markets, where it generated annualized returns of 15.4% in Europe versus 7.4% for the market, and annualized gains of 9.6% in Japan compared to 0.3% for the market, both for the period January 1986 to December 2016. In emerging markets, the formula has resulted in annualized performance of 19.3% against 6.3% for the market, over the period January 1993 to December 2016. In each case, the higher returns were achieved with lower volatility. [12]

For the Chinese A-share market, the formula delivered annualized returns of 10.9% versus 1.4% for the CSI-300 Index for the period August 2008 to August 2018, with lower volatility. [14] In India, it significantly outperformed the S&P BSE 100 Index by 12.6% per annum over the period September 2006 to June 2022, also with lower volatility. [15]

Criticism of Conservative Formula

  1. During the first quarter of 2020, low volatility stocks offered little risk reduction during the Covid-induced sell-off, while they also lagged during the subsequent sharp market rebound. As a result, some investors lost faith in the low-volatility approach. [21] [22]
  2. The quoted returns are gross of transaction costs. Net returns would typically be between 0.3% and 0.8% lower, based on the estimated range for annual transaction costs in international developed markets. [13]
  3. Due to hindsight bias and p-hacking the power of the formula may be overestimated.

While these critical points are relevant, out-of-sample tests can help falsify or verify the results of the original study. To this end, the Conservative Formula has been applied to other markets – such as the Chinese-A share and Indian equity markets – and exhibited strong results. For the US, the pre-sample evidence also reflects robust results for the period from January 1866 to December 1928. [23] Moreover, the post-publication results are positive despite the underperformance experienced in 2020. But since this accounts for a relatively short period, no strong and final conclusions can be drawn.

Comparison to other Investing Formulas

A 2024 study evaluates the formula for the U.S. market from 1963 to 2022 and compares it with the performance of the Magic Formula, F-Score, and Acquirer’s Multiple. The study finds that all four formulas generate significant raw and risk-adjusted returns, primarily by providing efficient exposure to well-established style factors. However, no single formula consistently outperforms across all performance metrics. The Acquirer’s Multiple achieves the highest returns for top decile portfolios, the Conservative Formula leads in CAPM alpha and return spread, and the Magic Formula exhibits the highest remaining alpha after adjusting for common factors. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

Investment is traditionally defined as the "commitment of resources to achieve later benefits". If an investment involves money, then it can be defined as a "commitment of money to receive more money later". From a broader viewpoint, an investment can be defined as "to tailor the pattern of expenditure and receipt of resources to optimise the desirable patterns of these flows". When expenditures and receipts are defined in terms of money, then the net monetary receipt in a time period is termed cash flow, while money received in a series of several time periods is termed cash flow stream.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital asset pricing model</span> Model used in finance

In finance, the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a model used to determine a theoretically appropriate required rate of return of an asset, to make decisions about adding assets to a well-diversified portfolio.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Value investing</span> Investment paradigm

Value investing is an investment paradigm that involves buying securities that appear underpriced by some form of fundamental analysis. Modern value investing derives from the investment philosophy taught by Benjamin Graham and David Dodd at Columbia Business School starting in 1928 and subsequently developed in their 1934 text Security Analysis.

The equity premium puzzle refers to the inability of an important class of economic models to explain the average equity risk premium (ERP) provided by a diversified portfolio of equities over that of government bonds, which has been observed for more than 100 years. There is a significant disparity between returns produced by stocks compared to returns produced by government treasury bills. The equity premium puzzle addresses the difficulty in understanding and explaining this disparity. This disparity is calculated using the equity risk premium:

In finance, statistical arbitrage is a class of short-term financial trading strategies that employ mean reversion models involving broadly diversified portfolios of securities held for short periods of time. These strategies are supported by substantial mathematical, computational, and trading platforms.

In finance, an investment strategy is a set of rules, behaviors or procedures, designed to guide an investor's selection of an investment portfolio. Individuals have different profit objectives, and their individual skills make different tactics and strategies appropriate. Some choices involve a tradeoff between risk and return. Most investors fall somewhere in between, accepting some risk for the expectation of higher returns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asset allocation</span> Investment strategy

Asset allocation is the implementation of an investment strategy that attempts to balance risk versus reward by adjusting the percentage of each asset in an investment portfolio according to the investor's risk tolerance, goals and investment time frame. The focus is on the characteristics of the overall portfolio. Such a strategy contrasts with an approach that focuses on individual assets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Market sentiment</span> General attitude of investors to market price development

Market sentiment, also known as investor attention, is the general prevailing attitude of investors as to anticipated price development in a market. This attitude is the accumulation of a variety of fundamental and technical factors, including price history, economic reports, seasonal factors, and national and world events. If investors expect upward price movement in the stock market, the sentiment is said to be bullish. On the contrary, if the market sentiment is bearish, most investors expect downward price movement. Market participants who maintain a static sentiment, regardless of market conditions, are described as permabulls and permabears respectively. Market sentiment is usually considered as a contrarian indicator: what most people expect is a good thing to bet against. Market sentiment is used because it is believed to be a good predictor of market moves, especially when it is more extreme. Very bearish sentiment is usually followed by the market going up more than normal, and vice versa. A bull market refers to a sustained period of either realized or expected price rises, whereas a bear market is used to describe when an index or stock has fallen 20% or more from a recent high for a sustained length of time.

Momentum investing is a system of buying stocks or other securities that have had high returns over the past three-to-twelve months, and selling those that have had poor returns over the same period.

Style investing is an investment approach in which securities are grouped into categories, and portfolio allocation is based on selection among "styles" rather than among individual securities.

Magic formula investing is an investment technique outlined by Joel Greenblatt that uses the principles of value investing.

In finance, a trading strategy is a fixed plan that is designed to achieve a profitable return by going long or short in markets.

Alternative beta is the concept of managing volatile "alternative investments", often through the use of hedge funds. Alternative beta is often also referred to as "alternative risk premia".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Volatility (finance)</span> Degree of variation of a trading price series over time

In finance, volatility is the degree of variation of a trading price series over time, usually measured by the standard deviation of logarithmic returns.

In asset pricing and portfolio management the Fama–French three-factor model is a statistical model designed in 1992 by Eugene Fama and Kenneth French to describe stock returns. Fama and French were colleagues at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, where Fama still works. In 2013, Fama shared the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his empirical analysis of asset prices. The three factors are (1) market excess return, (2) the outperformance of small versus big companies, and (3) the outperformance of high book/market versus low book/market companies. There is academic debate about the last two factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Low-volatility anomaly</span>

In investing and finance, the low-volatility anomaly is the observation that low-volatility securities have higher returns than high-volatility securities in most markets studied. This is an example of a stock market anomaly since it contradicts the central prediction of many financial theories that higher returns can only be achieved by taking more risk.

Factor investing is an investment approach that involves targeting quantifiable firm characteristics or “factors” that can explain differences in stock returns. Security characteristics that may be included in a factor-based approach include size, low-volatility, value, momentum, asset growth, profitability, leverage, term and carry.

Low-volatility investing is an investment style that buys stocks or securities with low volatility and avoids those with high volatility. This investment style exploits the low-volatility anomaly. According to financial theory risk and return should be positively related, however in practice this is not true. Low-volatility investors aim to achieve market-like returns, but with lower risk. This investment style is also referred to as minimum volatility, minimum variance, managed volatility, smart beta, defensive and conservative investing.

David C. Blitz is a Dutch econometrician and quantitative researcher on financial markets. He is a founding researcher of Robeco Quantitative Investments.

Pim van Vliet is a Dutch fund manager specializing in quantitative investment strategies, with a focus on low-volatility equities. As the head of conservative equities at Robeco Quantitative Investments, van Vliet has contributed to the field through both academic research and practical investment management.

References

  1. ↑ Vadim, Nagaev (2022-08-08). "Bloomberg webinar: Replicating the Research Paper 'the Conservative Formula'". Bloomberg Professional Services.
  2. ↑ "Multi Factor Investing Strategy and Portfolio - Validea.com". www.validea.com. Archived from the original on 2019-06-26. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  3. ↑ "Stock Screener". www.valuesignals.com. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  4. ↑ mementix (2018-04-26). "The Conservative Formula in Python: Quantitative Investing made Easy". r/algotrading. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  5. ↑ Rodriguez, Daniel (2019-08-29). "Rebalancing with the Conservative Formula". Medium. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  6. ↑ "High Returns from Low Risk: A Remarkable Stock Market Paradox | Wiley". Wiley.com. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  7. 1 2 "《低风险，高回报 一个引人注目的投资悖论 中信出版社》([荷]平·范·弗利特（Pim van Vliet） [荷]杨·德·科宁（Jan de Konin）)【摘要 书评 试读】- 京东图书". item.jd.com. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  8. ↑ Vliet, Pim van; Koning, Jan de (2017-01-23). Finanz Buch Verlag - Der Weg zum eigenen stabilen Aktien-Portfolio (in German). ISBN   978-3-95972-020-5.
  9. ↑ "Livre Un paradoxe financier étonnant - Economica - Finance". www.economica.fr. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  10. ↑ El pequeño libro de los altos rendimientos con bajo riesgo - Pim Van Vliet, Jan de Koning | PlanetadeLibros (in European Spanish).
  11. ↑ "Atlas Contact De conservatieve belegger - Pim van Vliet, Jan de Koning : Atlas Contact". www.atlascontact.nl. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  12. 1 2 Blitz, David; Vliet, Pim van (2018-07-31). "The Conservative Formula: Quantitative Investing Made Easy". The Journal of Portfolio Management. 44 (7): 24–38. doi:10.3905/jpm.2018.44.7.024. ISSN   0095-4918.
  13. 1 2 Van Vliet, Pim; Blitz, David (21 March 2018). "Social Science Research Network - SSRN". doi:10.2139/ssrn.3145152. S2CID   158864563. SSRN   3145152.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  14. 1 2 Pong, Eddie (2019-02-18). "Conservative Equity Investing". Rivermap. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  15. 1 2 Raju, Rajan; Teli, Anish (2022-07-15). "The Conservative Formula: Evidence from India". Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4163613. S2CID   250716909. SSRN   4163613.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  16. ↑ "Alpha Architect Review: The Conservative Formula: Quantitative Investing made Easy". Alpha Architect. 2018-09-11. Archived from the original on 2020-08-12. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  17. ↑ "High Returns From Low Risk: Th - GuruFocus.com". www.gurufocus.com. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  18. ↑ "Aprender a invertir: máxima rentabiliad y mínimo riesgo". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). 2019-09-19. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  19. ↑ "ETF guru | Swedroe explaining low-volatility". Archived from the original on 2015-02-14.
  20. ↑ "Low-volatility data free available for download". Low-volatility and Conservative Formula return series. Archived from the original on 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2022-01-08.
  21. ↑ Zweig, Jason (2020-09-18). "Some Investors Tried to Win by Losing Less. They Lost Anyway". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved 2022-08-08.
  22. ↑ "A fallen star of the investment world". Financial Times. 2021-03-22. Retrieved 2022-08-08.
  23. ↑ "Conservative investing stands the test of time". 23 May 2022. Retrieved 2022-08-16.
  24. ↑ Schwartz, M. & Hanauer, M.X., 2024. Formula Investing. SSRN Working Paper No. 5043197.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.