Momentum investing

Last updated • 4 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

Momentum investing is a system of buying stocks or other securities that have had high returns over the past three-to-twelve months, and selling those that have had poor returns over the same period. [1] [2]

Contents

While momentum investing is well-established as a phenomenon no consensus exists about the explanation for this strategy, and economists have trouble reconciling momentum with the efficient market hypothesis and random walk hypothesis. Two main hypotheses have been submitted to explain the momentum effect in terms of an efficient market. In the first, it is assumed that momentum investors bear significant risk for assuming this strategy, and, therefore, the high returns are a compensation for the risk. [3] Momentum strategies often involve disproportionately trading in stocks with high bid–ask spreads; thus, it is important to take transactions costs into account when evaluating momentum profitability. [4] The second theory assumes that momentum investors are exploiting behavioral shortcomings in other investors, such as investor herding, investor over- and underreaction, disposition effects and confirmation bias.

Seasonal or calendar effects may help to explain some of the reason for success in the momentum investing strategy. If a stock has performed poorly for months leading up to the end of the year, investors may decide to sell their holdings for tax purposes causing for example the January effect. Increased supply of shares in the market drive its price down, causing others to sell. Once the reason for tax selling is eliminated, the stock's price tends to recover.

History

Researchers have identified persistent momentum trends in stock markets as far back as the Victorian era (c. 1830s to 1900). [5] Richard Driehaus (1942—2021) is sometimes considered the father of momentum investing, but the strategy can be traced back before Donchian. [6] The strategy takes exception with the old stock market adage of buying low and selling high. According to Driehaus, "far more money is made buying high and selling at even higher prices." [7]

In the late 2000s, as computer and networking speeds increase each year, there were many sub-variants of momentum investing being deployed in the markets by computer driven models. Some of these operate on a very small time scale, such as high-frequency trading, which often execute dozens or even hundreds of trades per second.

Although this is a reemergence of an investing style that was prevalent in the 1990s, [8] ETFs for this style began trading in 2015. [9]

Performance of momentum strategies

In a study in 1993, Narasimhan Jegadeesh and Sheridan Titman reported that this strategy gives average returns of 1% per month for the following 3–12 months. [10] This finding has been confirmed by many other academic studies, some from the 19th century, [11] [12] [13] though momentum strategies are associated with an increased risk of crashes and major losses. [5]

Turnover tend to be high for momentum strategies, which could reduce the net returns of a momentum strategy. Some even claim that transaction costs wipe out momentum profits. [14] In their 2014 study 'fact, fiction, and momentum investing' Cliff Asness and his co-authors address 10 issues with regards to momentum investing, including transaction costs. [15]

The performance of momentum comes with occasional large crashes. For example, in 2009, momentum experienced a crash of -73.42% in three months. [16] This downside risk of momentum can be reduced with a so called 'residual momentum' strategy in which only the stock specific part of momentum is used. [17]

A momentum strategy can also be applied across industries and across markets. [18] [19]

Explanation

In capital market theory, the momentum factor is one of the most well-known market anomalies. In studies, it has been observed that securities that have risen in recent months tend to continue to do so for a few more months. Depending on which past period was taken as a reference and how long the securities were held thereafter, a different magnitude of effect was observed. The same applies in reverse for securities that have recently fallen in value. One explanation is the so-called post-earnings announcement drift, which assumes that investors initially do not fully price in the higher enterprise value after the announcement of better-than-expected earnings figures. The share price only rises gradually with a delay until the true higher value is only reached after a few months. [20]

Since past price information hereby provides information about future developments and a profitable strategy can be generated from it, the momentum factor is in contradiction to the weak market efficiency. So-called momentum crashes, which usually occur in recovery phases after financial market crashes, are considered to be a risk-based explanation. [21] Most alternative explanations come from behavioral finance.

See also

Related Research Articles

Passive management is an investing strategy that tracks a market-weighted index or portfolio. Passive management is most common on the equity market, where index funds track a stock market index, but it is becoming more common in other investment types, including bonds, commodities and hedge funds.

Investment is traditionally defined as the "commitment of resources to achieve later benefits". If an investment involves money, then it can be defined as a "commitment of money to receive more money later". From a broader viewpoint, an investment can be defined as "to tailor the pattern of expenditure and receipt of resources to optimise the desirable patterns of these flows". When expenditures and receipts are defined in terms of money, then the net monetary receipt in a time period is termed cash flow, while money received in a series of several time periods is termed cash flow stream.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Efficient-market hypothesis</span> Economic theory that asset prices fully reflect all available information

The efficient-market hypothesis (EMH) is a hypothesis in financial economics that states that asset prices reflect all available information. A direct implication is that it is impossible to "beat the market" consistently on a risk-adjusted basis since market prices should only react to new information.

An exchange-traded fund (ETF) is a type of investment fund that is also an exchange-traded product, i.e., it is traded on stock exchanges. ETFs own financial assets such as stocks, bonds, currencies, debts, futures contracts, and/or commodities such as gold bars. Many ETFs provide some level of diversification compared to owning an individual stock.

Market timing is the strategy of making buying or selling decisions of financial assets by attempting to predict future market price movements. The prediction may be based on an outlook of market or economic conditions resulting from technical or fundamental analysis. This is an investment strategy based on the outlook for an aggregate market rather than for a particular financial asset.

A market anomaly in a financial market is predictability that seems to be inconsistent with theories of asset prices. Standard theories include the capital asset pricing model and the Fama-French Three Factor Model, but a lack of agreement among academics about the proper theory leads many to refer to anomalies without a reference to a benchmark theory. Indeed, many academics simply refer to anomalies as "return predictors", avoiding the problem of defining a benchmark theory.

In finance, an investment strategy is a set of rules, behaviors or procedures, designed to guide an investor's selection of an investment portfolio. Individuals have different profit objectives, and their individual skills make different tactics and strategies appropriate. Some choices involve a tradeoff between risk and return. Most investors fall somewhere in between, accepting some risk for the expectation of higher returns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Market sentiment</span> General attitude of investors to market price development

Market sentiment, also known as investor attention, is the general prevailing attitude of investors as to anticipated price development in a market. This attitude is the accumulation of a variety of fundamental and technical factors, including price history, economic reports, seasonal factors, and national and world events. If investors expect upward price movement in the stock market, the sentiment is said to be bullish. On the contrary, if the market sentiment is bearish, most investors expect downward price movement. Market participants who maintain a static sentiment, regardless of market conditions, are described as permabulls and permabears respectively. Market sentiment is usually considered as a contrarian indicator: what most people expect is a good thing to bet against. Market sentiment is used because it is believed to be a good predictor of market moves, especially when it is more extreme. Very bearish sentiment is usually followed by the market going up more than normal, and vice versa. A bull market refers to a sustained period of either realized or expected price rises, whereas a bear market is used to describe when an index or stock has fallen 20% or more from a recent high for a sustained length of time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fed model</span> Disputed equity valuation model

The "Fed model", or "Fed Stock Valuation Model" (FSVM), is a disputed theory of equity valuation that compares the stock market's forward earnings yield to the nominal yield on long-term government bonds, and that the stock market – as a whole – is fairly valued, when the one-year forward-looking I/B/E/S earnings yield equals the 10-year nominal Treasury yield; deviations suggest over-or-under valuation.

Fundamentally based indexes or fundamental indexes, also called fundamentally weighted indexes, are indexes in which stocks are weighted according to factors related to their fundamentals such as earnings, dividends and assets, commonly used when performing corporate valuations. This fundamental weight may be calculated statically, or it may be adjusted by the security's fundamental to market capitalization ratio to further neutralize the price factor between different securities. Indexes that use a composite of several fundamental factors attempt to average out sector biases that may arise from relying on a single fundamental factor. A key belief behind the fundamental index methodology is that underlying corporate accounting/valuation figures are more accurate estimators of a company's intrinsic value, rather than the listed market value of the company, i.e. that one should buy and sell companies in line with their accounting figures rather than according to their current market prices. In this sense fundamental indexing is linked to so-called fundamental analysis.

There are several concepts of efficiency for a financial market. The most widely discussed is informational or price efficiency, which is a measure of how quickly and completely the price of a single asset reflects available information about the asset's value. Other concepts include functional/operational efficiency, which is inversely related to the costs that investors bear for making transactions, and allocative efficiency, which is a measure of how far a market channels funds from ultimate lenders to ultimate borrowers in such a way that the funds are used in the most productive manner.

Sheridan Dean Titman is a professor of finance at the University of Texas at Austin, where he holds the McAllister Centennial Chair in Financial Services at the McCombs School of Business. He received a B.S. degree (1975) from the University of Colorado and an M.S. (1978) and Ph.D. (1981) from Carnegie Mellon University.

An exchange-traded note (ETN) is a senior, unsecured, unsubordinated debt security issued by an underwriting bank or by a special-purpose entity. Similar to other debt securities, ETNs may have a maturity date and are backed by the credit of the issuer, though some ETNs may have a portfolio of assets given as a collateral.

In finance, momentum is the empirically observed tendency for rising asset prices or securities return to rise further, and falling prices to keep falling. For instance, it was shown that stocks with strong past performance continue to outperform stocks with poor past performance in the next period with an average excess return of about 1% per month. Momentum signals have been used by financial analysts in their buy and sell recommendations.

In asset pricing and portfolio management the Fama–French three-factor model is a statistical model designed in 1992 by Eugene Fama and Kenneth French to describe stock returns. Fama and French were colleagues at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, where Fama still works. In 2013, Fama shared the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his empirical analysis of asset prices. The three factors are (1) market excess return, (2) the outperformance of small versus big companies, and (3) the outperformance of high book/market versus low book/market companies. There is academic debate about the last two factors.

Clifford Scott Asness is an American hedge fund manager and the co-founder of AQR Capital Management. As of July 2024, Forbes estimated his net worth at US$2.0 billion.

Smart beta investment portfolios are long-only rules-based investment strategies that aim to outperform a capitalization-weighted benchmark. A comprehensive analysis of smart beta strategies has found that smart beta strategies have underperformed by 1% on average since launch.

Factor investing is an investment approach that involves targeting quantifiable firm characteristics or “factors” that can explain differences in stock returns. Security characteristics that may be included in a factor-based approach include size, low-volatility, value, momentum, asset growth, profitability, leverage, term and carry.

Style drift occurs when a mutual fund's actual and declared investment style differs. A mutual fund’s declared investment style can be found in the fund prospectus which investors commonly rely upon to aid their investment decisions. For most investors, they assumed that mutual fund managers will invest according to the advertised guidelines, this is however, not the case for a fund with style drift. Style drift is commonplace in today’s mutual fund industry, making no distinction between developed and developing markets according to studies in the United States by Brown and Goetzmann (1997) and in China as reported in Sina Finance.

Pim van Vliet is a Dutch fund manager specializing in quantitative investment strategies, with a focus on low-volatility equities. As the head of conservative equities at Robeco Quantitative Investments, van Vliet has contributed to the field through both academic research and practical investment management.

References

  1. "Momentum Investing Definition | Investopedia". Investopedia.
  2. Low, R.K.Y.; Tan, E. (2016). "The Role of Analysts' Forecasts in the Momentum Effect" (PDF). International Review of Financial Analysis. 48: 67–84. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2016.09.007.
  3. Li, Xiaofei; Miffre, Joelle; Brooks, Chris; O'Sullivan, Niall (2008). "Momentum profits and time-varying unsystematic risk". Journal of Banking & Finance. 32 (4): 541–558. arXiv: quant-ph/0403227 . doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.03.014. ISSN   0378-4266.
  4. Li, Xiaofei; Brooks, Chris; Miffre, Joelle (2009). "Low-cost momentum strategies" (PDF). Journal of Asset Management. 9 (6): 366–379. doi:10.1057/jam.2008.28. ISSN   1470-8272.
  5. 1 2 Chabot, Benjamin Remy and Ghysels, Eric and Jagannathan, Ravi, Momentum Trading, Return Chasing, and Predictable Crashes (November 2014). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP10234, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2521455
  6. Antonacci, Gary (2014). Dual Momentum Investing: An Innovative Approach for Higher Returns with Lower Risk. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. pp. 13–18. ISBN   978-0071849449.
  7. Schwager, Jack D. The New Market Wizards: Conversations With America's Top Traders. John Wiley and Sons, 1992, p. 224, ISBN   0-471-13236-5
  8. Waggoner, John (September 9, 2016). "Momentum investing gaining speed among financial advisers". Investment News. Retrieved November 2, 2016.
  9. "Comparing Investor Options in the Momentum ETF Space". ETF Daily News. September 21, 2016. Retrieved November 2, 2016.
  10. Jegadeesh, N.; Titman, S. (1993). "Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency" (PDF). The Journal of Finance . 48 (1): 65–91. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x. JSTOR   2328882. S2CID   13713547.
  11. Goetzmann, William N; Huang, Simon (2018). "Momentum in Imperial Russia" (PDF). Journal of Financial Economics. 130 (3): 579–591. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.07.008.
  12. Swinkels, Laurens (2005). "Momentum investing: A survey". Journal of Asset Management. 5 (2): 120–143. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240133. S2CID   154743614.
  13. Geczy, Christopher; Samonov, Mikhail (2018-12-27). "Two Centuries of Price Return Momentum". Financial Analyst Journal. 72 (5): 32–56. doi:10.2469/faj.v72.n5.1.
  14. Korajczyk, Robert A.; Sadka, Ronnie (2004). "Are Momentum Profits Robust to Trading Costs?". The Journal of Finance. 59 (3): 1039–1082. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00656.x.
  15. Asness, Clifford; Frazzini, Andrea (2014). "Fact, Fiction, and Momentum Investing". Journal of Portfolio Management. 40 (5): 75–92. doi:10.3905/jpm.2014.40.5.075. S2CID   201398399.
  16. Barroso, Pedro; Santa-Clara, Pedro (April 2015). "Momentum has its moments". Journal of Financial Economics. 116 (1): 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.11.010.
  17. Blitz, David; Martens, Martin (2011). "Residual momentum". Journal of Empirical Finance. 18 (3): 506–521. doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.01.003. hdl: 1765/22252 . SSRN   2319861.
  18. Asness, Clifford; Moskowitz, Tobias J (2013). "Value and momentum everywhere". The Journal of Finance. 68 (3): 929–985. doi:10.1111/jofi.12021. hdl: 10398/9cef71a9-adf5-4d83-925d-53c571dd0691 .
  19. Blitz, David; van Vliet, Pim (2008). "Global Tactical Cross-Asset Allocation: Applying Value and Momentum Across Asset Classes" (PDF). Journal of Portfolio Management. 35 (1): 23–38. doi:10.3905/JPM.2008.35.1.23. hdl: 1765/12598 . S2CID   53467731. SSRN   1079975.
  20. Bernard, Victor L.; Thomas, Jacob K. (1989). "Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium?". Journal of Accounting Research. 27: 1–36. doi:10.2307/2491062. ISSN   0021-8456. JSTOR   2491062.
  21. Daniel, Kent; Moskowitz, Tobias (August 2014). "Momentum Crashes". Cambridge, MA. doi: 10.3386/w20439 .{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

Further reading