This article needs additional citations for verification .(November 2009) |
Stock dilution, also known as equity dilution, is the decrease in existing shareholders' ownership percentage of a company as a result of the company issuing new equity. [1] New equity increases the total shares outstanding which has a dilutive effect on the ownership percentage of existing shareholders. This increase in the number of shares outstanding can result from a primary market offering (including an initial public offering), employees exercising stock options, or by issuance or conversion of convertible bonds, preferred shares or warrants into stock. This dilution can shift fundamental positions of the stock such as ownership percentage, voting control, earnings per share, and the value of individual shares.
Control dilution describes the reduction in ownership percentage or loss of a controlling share of an investment's stock. Many venture capital contracts contain an anti-dilution provision in favor of the original investors, to protect their equity investments. One way to raise new equity without diluting voting control is to give warrants to all the existing shareholders equally. They can choose to put more money in the company, or else lose ownership percentage. When employee options threaten to dilute the ownership of a control group, the company can use cash to buy back the shares issued.
The measurement of percent dilution is calculated at a specific point in time. Because it depends on market prices and assumptions about convertibility, the resulting figure changes as market values change and should not be interpreted as a permanent or comprehensive “measure of the impact” of dilution. [2] The standard approach used in diluted EPS calculations under U.S. GAAP follows the steps outlined below: [3] [4] [5]
Earnings dilution refers to the decline in earnings per share (EPS) that occurs when a company’s total share count increases. The concept is closely tied to control dilution, since both involve estimating how many additional shares would exist if potentially dilutive securities—such as options, warrants, or convertible debt—were assumed to convert.
Under U.S. GAAP, diluted EPS is calculated by estimating the net increase in shares that would result if all dilutive securities were converted at the beginning of the reporting period. [6] This incremental share count, determined using the standard dilution methods, is added to the number of shares already outstanding at the start of the period. The company’s net income is then divided by this higher share figure.
Finance literature emphasizes that these calculations rely on market values at the beginning of the period, not at the end, because the dilution effect reflects the assumptions used in the treasury-stock and if-converted methods. [7] In other words, the impact comes from the change in share count—not from any return the company might earn by reinvesting the cash proceeds associated with the assumed conversions.
Accounting guides make this distinction clear: diluted EPS reflects only the share dilution effect and excludes hypothetical investment gains on the proceeds from option exercises or debt conversions. [8] [9]
Value dilution describes the reduction in the current price of a stock due to the increase in the number of shares. This generally occurs when shares are issued in exchange for the purchase of a business, and incremental income from the new business must be at least the return on equity (ROE) of the old business. When the purchase price includes goodwill, this becomes a higher hurdle to clear.
The theoretical diluted price, i.e. the price after an increase in the number of shares, can be calculated as:
Where:
For example, if there is a 3-for-10 issue, the current price is $0.50, the issue price $0.32, we have
If new shares are issued at a price at least equal to the current market value of the company’s outstanding shares, the existing shareholders do not experience an economic loss. In this case, they simply own a smaller percentage of a now larger company, and although their proportional voting rights decline, their wealth is not diluted. [10]
However, when new shares are issued at a price below the pre-existing market value, existing shareholders may experience economic dilution unless they participate in the offering. Finance literature notes that shareholders can preserve both their voting power and economic position by purchasing a proportional number of the newly issued shares, a mechanism commonly reflected in preemptive rights and rights offerings. [11] [12]
Frequently the market value for shares will be higher than the book value. Investors will not receive full value unless the proceeds equal the market value. When this shortfall is triggered by the exercise of employee stock options, it is a measure of wage expense. When new shares are issued at full value, the excess of the market value over the book value is a kind of internalized capital gain for the investor. They are in the same position as if they sold the same % interest in the secondary market.
Assuming that markets are efficient, the market price of a stock will reflect these evaluations, but with the increase in shareholder equity 'management' and prevalence of barter transactions involving equity, this assumption may be stretched.
Preferred share conversions are usually done on a dollar-for-dollar basis. $1,000 face value of preferreds will be exchanged for $1,000 worth of common shares (at market value). As the common shares increase in value, the preferreds will dilute them less (in terms of percent-ownership), and vice versa. In terms of value dilution, there will be none from the point of view of the shareholder. Since most shareholders are invested in the belief the stock price will increase, this is not a problem.
When the stock price declines because of some bad news, the company's next report will have to measure, not only the financial results of the bad news, but also the increase in the dilution percentage. This exacerbates the problem and increases the downward pressure on the stock, increasing dilution. Some financing vehicles are structured to augment this process by redefining the conversion factor as the stock price declines, thus leading to a "death spiral".
Options and warrants are converted at pre-defined rates. As the stock price increases, their value increases dollar-for-dollar. If the stock is valued at a stable price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) it can be predicted that the options' rate of increase in value will be 20 times (when P/E=20) the rate of increase in earnings. The calculation of "what percentage share of future earnings increases goes to the holders of options instead of shareholders?" is [13] [ unreliable source? ]
For example, if the options outstanding equals 5% of the issued shares and the P/E=20, then 95% (= 5/105*20) of any increase in earnings goes, not to the shareholders, but to the options holders.
A share dilution scam happens when a company, typically traded in unregulated markets such as the OTC Bulletin Board and the Pink Sheets, repeatedly issues a massive number of shares into the market (using follow-on offerings) for no particular reason, considerably devaluing share prices until they become almost worthless, causing huge losses to shareholders.
Then, after share prices are at or near the minimum price a stock can trade and the share float has increased to an unsustainable level, those fraudulent companies tend to reverse split and continue repeating the same scheme.
Stock dilution has special relevance to investor-backed private companies and startups. Significantly dilutive events occur much more frequently for private companies than they do for public companies. These events happen because private companies frequently issue large amounts of new stock every time they raise money from investors.
Private company investors often acquire large ownership stakes (20–35%) and invest large sums of money as part of the venture capital process. To accommodate this, private companies must issue large amounts of stock to these investors. The issuance of stock to new investors creates significant dilution for founders and existing shareholders.
Company founders start with 100% ownership of their company but frequently have less than 35% ownership in the later-stages of their companies' life cycles (i.e., before a sale of the company or an IPO). [1] While founders and investors both understand this dilution, managing it and minimizing it can often be the difference between a successful outcome for founders and a failure. As such, dilutive terms are heavily negotiated in venture capital deals.
"If shares are issued at fair market value, existing shareholders do not lose wealth; their ownership is diluted in percentage terms but not in economic value."
"Issuing shares below market value transfers wealth from existing shareholders to new investors unless existing holders have preemptive rights allowing them to buy new shares to maintain their ownership percentages."
"Rights offerings allow existing shareholders to avoid dilution when new shares are issued at a discount by purchasing shares in proportion to their current holdings."