Corporate law in Vietnam

Last updated

Corporate law in Vietnam [1] was originally based on the French commercial law system. However, since Vietnam's independence in 1945, it has largely been influenced by the ruling Communist Party. Currently, the main sources of corporate law are the Law on Enterprises, [2] the Law on Securities [3] and the Law on Investment. [4]

Contents

History of corporate law and sources of law in Vietnam

The post-independence period (1945–1986)

Corporate law in Vietnam is largely influenced by French laws due to its colonial past. After the 1954 Geneva Conference, Vietnam separated into two zones: the North and the South. In 1980, after the North took control of the South, the country adopted a centrally-planned economy, with officials discouraging private commerce. [5]

History of Vietnam Corporate Law History of Vietnam Corporate Law.tiff
History of Vietnam Corporate Law

Doi Moi (post-1986)

In 1986, the government initiated economic reforms (Doi Moi) to the corporate sector to reinvigorate the ailing economy. These policies aimed to reverse most of policies that led to economic crises in the 1970s and 1980s following the Vietnam War. Development of the private sector was encouraged and the economy was liberalized in hopes of increasing the potential for economic development. In 1987, the Law on Foreign Investment was passed, allowing foreign investors into the country. [6]

In 1990, the Law on Private Enterprises and Companies Law were introduced to boost economic development. They were subsequently superseded by the Law on Enterprises (LOE) in 1999, which introduced Partnerships in addition to Limited Liability Companies and Shareholding Companies. Within three years of implementing the LOE, over 70,000 enterprises were registered as compared to just over 40,000 for the previous nine years. [7] Law on Investment (replacing Law on Foreign Investment) and a new LOE were enacted in 2005. [8] These statutes are expected to further strengthen Vietnam's economy and its potential for international economic integration.

Main sources of law in Vietnam

The Constitution - Mainly seen as the ultimate Party policy documents. [9] 4 different versions (1946, 1959, 1980, 1992)

Legislation - Originated from civil law passed down from the French. [10]

Forms of business enterprise

The LOE governs business enterprises in Vietnam. Enterprises in all economic sectors have to satisfy the stipulated conditions accounted for in Article 7(2). There are 4 forms of business enterprises.

Limited liability company (LLC)

Structure of Limited Liability Companies LLC.tiff
Structure of Limited Liability Companies

An LLC is established by members' capital contribution to the company. As a LLC is a legal entity separate from the owners, the owner(s)'s liability for the firm's debts and obligations is limited to his capital contribution. [11]

LLCs exist in two forms - one-member LLC, or multi-member LLC. The former is owned by an organisation/individual, [12] while the latter allows for two to fifty members. [13]

The management structure consists of a Members' Council (MC), Chairperson of the MC and Director. Where there are more than 11 members in LLC, an Inspection Committee (IC) must also be established. [14]

Shareholding Company (SC)

Structure of a Shareholding Company Shareholding Company.tiff
Structure of a Shareholding Company

An SC is an entity with at least three shareholders, [15] where ownership of the firm depends on the number of shares they hold. It is the only form of enterprise that can issue securities to raise capital.

Shareholders' liability is limited to their capital contribution; [16] however, shareholders can be personally liable where the company is substantially undercapitalised on formation.

The management structure consists of a shareholders' meeting (SM), a board of management (BOM), a director and an IC. [17]

Partnership

A partnership comprises at least two co-owners jointly conducting business under one common name, [18] with at least one co-owner being an individual. In a partnership, there can be both limited [19] and unlimited liability [20] partners.

The Partners' Council, consisting of all partners, is the highest body in the partnership with the right to resolve all business affairs, such as the admission of new partners. [21]

Private enterprises

A private enterprise is a firm owned by an individual, who is its legal representative [22] The owner has total discretion in making business decisions, [23] and is liable for its operations to the extent of all his assets. [24] Each individual can only establish one private enterprise. [25]

Rules concerning ownership of businesses

The government has rules to restrict certain lines of businesses, [26] and will periodically review business conditions and proceed with any changes accordingly.

The rights and obligations of business enterprises are provided for in Articles 8–10; but might differ slightly should the enterprise offer public services or products.

Ownership Differences Ownership Differences.tiff
Ownership Differences

Limited liability company (LLC)

Owners in LLCs have to contribute capital in full and on time. In one-member LLCs, the owner will be responsible for debts and other property obligations if he fails to do so. [27] Meanwhile, in multi-member LLCs, members are to contribute capital in the type of asset, and any change is subject to the consent of other members. [28]

Owners in LLCs can assign a share of their capital contribution except where prohibited. [29] In one-member LLCs, this is the only way for the owner to withdraw capital.

Shareholding Company (SC)

The government provides specific provisions on the forms of offering securities to the public. [30] In offering securities, SCs are subject to conditions laid out in the Securities Law, such as the requirement for a paid-up charter capital at the time of offering of at least VND 10 billion in book value. [31]

Founding shareholders can assign their registered ordinary shares to each other if they hold 20% of ordinary shares for 3 years from the date of the Business Registration Certificate. Approval at the SM will allow a non-founding shareholder to purchase registered ordinary shares from a founding shareholder.

Partnerships

If an unlimited-liability partner fails to contribute capital accordingly, other partners may be held liable to compensate the partnership for the damage. However, where the limited liability partner fails to contribute capital accordingly, the unpaid amount will become a debt owed by that partner to the partnership.

An unlimited liability partner can transfer his share of capital in the partnership to another person only with the consent of the other unlimited liability partners.

Private enterprises

The owner must register his investment capital in the firm, and record changes in the investment capital in the accounts.

Rules concerning corporate governance

Regulation of governing bodies

Ownership

The ownership powers of the enterprises are vested in the MC/Chairman for LLCs [32] [33] and in the SM and BOM for SCs. [34] [35] They are the highest decision making bodies for each enterprise and are tasked with the passing of resolutions, amending the Company Charter and setting out the general direction of the Company, etc. [36] [37] [38] A resolution can only be passed with a minimum percentage approval. [39] [40] Such a rule is put in place to ensure the interests of all shareholders are protected.

Executive

The Director, appointed by the ownership institutions of the enterprise, has Executive powers and oversees the day-to-day running of the Company for SCs [41] and LLCs. [42] [43] He is legally responsible for the implementation of delegated rights and obligations. Directors of LLCs cannot be affiliated to any member of the MC, [44] ensuring the separation of powers between the company's ownership and management.

However, for SCs, the LOE permits persons to take up dual roles as Director and chairman of the BOM. [45] One survey found that 75% of chairmen of a BOM were also the Directors of their company. Furthermore, other members of the BOM are often majority shareholders and managers of the company. This highlights an indefinite differentiation between ownership and management.

Inspection

The LOE prescribes the formation of a mandatory IC to monitor and check the ownership and executive powers. [46] [47] Members of the IC must minimally possess professional qualifications or accounting/auditing work experience, [48] and cannot be related to members of the ownership or executive bodies. [48] This ensures impartiality and prevents conflict of interests. However, in SCs, while members of the IC cannot hold any managerial positions in the company, they are allowed to own company shares or be a general employee of the Company. [49]

Individual liability for corporate actions

Ownership Representatives

Where the MC/Chairman of the LLC fails to convene a requested meeting within 15 days of the request, he must bear personal liability for any damage that may result to the company. [50]

Executive

The LOE prescribes that the Director of a LLC may be sued by shareholders should he fail to perform his obligations and duties. [51] In contrast, in a SC, there are no such provisions to grant the shareholders power to bring an action against Directors who do not perform their duties. While the law lays out the fiduciary duties of the Directors, it does not provide a way to enforce these duties. This has led to the criticism that the interests of shareholders of SCs are not adequately protected. [52]

Inspectors

The IC is legally responsible for the implementation of its rights and duties. [46] The LOE however does not specify the circumstances under which the IC will be deemed to have neglected its rights and duties and hence be legally liable.

Restrictions on transactions with owners/shareholders

The LOE prescribes certain regulations to control and approve large related-party transactions. For SCs, if a loan agreement/contract is valued at at least 50% of the company's total assets, it is subject to approval by the BOM. [53]

All related-party transactions must be approved by the shareholders. [53] 'Related-party' include managers of the enterprise or family members of shareholders, [54] and related-party transactions are business arrangements between two parties with prior relationships.

Management personnel have to disclose details of their and their related parties' ownership interests in other enterprises; the latter applies where the related-party holds more than 35% of charter capital. [54] These measures ensure that personal interests do not override the company's interests. In addition, shareholders or directors related to the transaction cannot vote on the deal. [55]

The LOE, however, does not provide for an external checking mechanism for related-party transactions. The BOM has the sole and unfettered right to give approval to related-party transactions, and this lack of an extra checking mechanism has resulted in a lack of investor protection in Vietnam. [Note 1]

Foreign investment

Both foreign and domestic investments are similarly treated under the LOI. Foreign investors and expatriates working for foreign-invested businesses or business co-operation contract can remit investment capital, profits and other assets, and their income abroad respectively. [56] There are four types of foreign investment in Vietnam: [57]

Foreign owned enterprise

Foreign investors may establish economic organizations or LLCs in the form of 100% capital of foreign investors. [58]

Joint venture

Foreign investors may enter a joint venture where there is at least one foreign and one domestic investor. [59] The operational duration of a Foreign Invested Project cannot exceed 50 years; where the Government thinks it necessary to continue, it cannot exceed 70 years. [60] FOEs are recommended over joint ventures and they can be formed quickly through application of investment licenses. Joint ventures face problems such as corruption and the lack of control over the business. [61]

Business cooperation contract

Foreign investors may invest in contractual agreements with Vietnamese partners to cooperate on specific business activities. This form of investment does not constitute a new legal entity and the investors have unlimited liability for BCC's debts. [62]

BOT/ BTO/ BT

A foreign investor can sign such a contract with a State body to implement projects for expansion and modernization of infrastructure projects in the sectors stipulated by the Government. [63] [64]

Analysis and assessment of current rules

Comparison with other jurisdictions

Flexibility in choosing corporate governance structures

Although Vietnam's corporate law adopted Anglo-American legal principles, common law jurisdictions like the US grant businesses greater flexibility in choosing corporate governance structures. The LOE, however, imposes mandatory internal governance structures. [65] This has been criticised for failing to give companies the latitude to adapt their corporate governance structures to suit their needs. [66] Anglo-American law allows directors to delegate their powers to a sub-committee or another person. [67] Meanwhile, in Vietnam, subcommittees can be established to assist the BOM, but the latter cannot delegate its powers to the former. The imposition of mandatory corporate governance structures without delegation of powers leads to less flexibility and efficiency. [68]

Comparisons between jurisdictions Jursidictions.tiff
Comparisons between jurisdictions

Separation of supervisory and management bodies

Internal governance structures are important in supervising the company managers. In US, the supervisory body is often subsumed within the single-tiered board of directors, whereas in Vietnam, the IC is an independent body. Through separation of supervisory and management functions, the Vietnamese corporate law model, at least theoretically, ensures that the BOM is held to a greater degree of accountability by an independent checking mechanism. However, there is no hierarchy for the Vietnamese IC and BOM. This contrasts with the German two-tiered board model for SCs, with an Aufsichtsrat (supervisory board) which is hierarchically superior to the Vorstand (management board). Because the IC is not recognised as a superior institution, it has limited authority over the BOM. In practice, many supervisors are low level employees within the company. Although institutionally independent, the members of the IC are, in reality, dependent on their employers for their livelihoods, and therefore serve as a weak check against mismanagement by the BOM or Director.

Vesting of executive powers

In Vietnam, executive powers are vested solely in the Director while in Germany, executive powers are shared equally amongst members of the Vorstand. This encourages consensus decision-making in German companies as responsibility is shared amongst all members of the Vorstand. [69] This can be further contrasted with Japan, where the corporate law does not designate any positions for corporate officers (the Vietnamese equivalent of Director) and executive powers are largely retained within the Board of Directors (the Vietnamese equivalent of BOM). [70]

Problems

Understanding corporate governance and role of management structures

Corporate governance in Vietnam is seen more as a management framework rather than a system for accountability and protecting minority shareholders. In particular, the LOE does not clearly mandate the separation of ownership and management. Separation of ownership and management promotes accountability by allowing managers to be objectively appraised. On the other hand, owners who serve as managers will be more likely to pursue their own interests, possibly at the expense of the interests of minority shareholders.

State-owned enterprises

Following the introduction of LOE, SOEs were converted to single-organisation-owned LLCs. [71] However, the state retains many powers and is directly involved in management decision-making. Government officials are thus selected to run companies for political reasons. Their lack of business expertise and profit motive has led to inefficiency and mismanagement of large state-owned enterprises. [72] Furthermore, since only up to three supervisors can be appointed, there is limited monitoring on the company managers. In 2010, the state-owned shipbuilding firm Vinashin ended in bankruptcy, following mismanagement and false reporting of financial statements. [73] This reflects the inadequate monitoring and auditing mechanisms for SOEs.

Investor protection

The LOE is increasingly recognizing the interests of minority shareholders by introducing new avenues for them to hold the management accountable. [Note 2] Nonetheless, with stringent prerequisites including higher shareholding requirements and the need to show evidence before minority shareholders can call for a shareholders' meeting, investor protection in Vietnam is still limited compared to other jurisdictions. [Note 3] Other shortcomings of the LOE include limited opportunities for shareholders to request a meeting, no imposition of legal responsibilities on board members who approve unfair transactions, no shareholders' rights to sue those in the corporate governance structure (for SCs), and a shortage of provisions to require disclosure obligations and directors to avoid insolvent trading.

See also

Notes

  1. In a 2006 World Bank research, Vietnam tallied a score of 0 in the extent of director liability index, a stark contrast to the average score of 4.4 attained for East Asia and Pacific economies. [52]
  2. These new measures includes basic rights of shareholders such as attending the General Shareholders' Meeting, voting on the basis of one share one vote, selecting senior managers and supervisors and having priority in making additional capital contributions, among others.
  3. These other jurisdictions include China, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Australia, Germany and New Zealand.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Board of directors</span> Type of governing body for an organisation

A board of directors is an executive committee that jointly supervises the activities of an organization, which can be either a for-profit or a nonprofit organization such as a business, nonprofit organization, or a government agency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporation</span> Legal entity incorporated through a legislative or registration process

A corporation is an organization—usually a group of people or a company—authorized by the state to act as a single entity and recognized as such in law for certain purposes. Early incorporated entities were established by charter. Most jurisdictions now allow the creation of new corporations through registration. Corporations come in many different types but are usually divided by the law of the jurisdiction where they are chartered based on two aspects: by whether they can issue stock, or by whether they are formed to make a profit. Depending on the number of owners, a corporation can be classified as aggregate or sole.

Business is the practice of making one's living or making money by producing or buying and selling products. It is also "any activity or enterprise entered into for profit."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equity (finance)</span> Ownership of property reduced by its liabilities

In finance, equity is an ownership interest in property that may be offset by debts or other liabilities. Equity is measured for accounting purposes by subtracting liabilities from the value of the assets owned. For example, if someone owns a car worth $24,000 and owes $10,000 on the loan used to buy the car, the difference of $14,000 is equity. Equity can apply to a single asset, such as a car or house, or to an entire business. A business that needs to start up or expand its operations can sell its equity in order to raise cash that does not have to be repaid on a set schedule.

Corporate governance is defined, described or delineated in diverse ways, depending on the writer's purpose. Writers focused on a disciplinary interest or context often adopt narrow definitions that appear purpose-specific. Writers concerned with regulatory policy in relation to corporate governance practices often use broader structural descriptions. A broad (meta) definition that encompasses many adopted definitions is "Corporate governance describes the processes, structures, and mechanisms that influence the control and direction of corporations."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Limited liability company</span> US form of a private limited company

A limited liability company is the United States-specific form of a private limited company. It is a business structure that can combine the pass-through taxation of a partnership or sole proprietorship with the limited liability of a corporation. An LLC is not a corporation under state law; it is a legal form of a company that provides limited liability to its owners in many jurisdictions. LLCs are well known for the flexibility that they provide to business owners; depending on the situation, an LLC may elect to use corporate tax rules instead of being treated as a partnership, and, under certain circumstances, LLCs may be organized as not-for-profit. In certain U.S. states, businesses that provide professional services requiring a state professional license, such as legal or medical services, may not be allowed to form an LLC but may be required to form a similar entity called a professional limited liability company (PLLC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joint-stock company</span> Business entity which is owned by shareholders

A joint-stock company is a business entity in which shares of the company's stock can be bought and sold by shareholders. Each shareholder owns company stock in proportion, evidenced by their shares. Shareholders are able to transfer their shares to others without any effects to the continued existence of the company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Limited company</span> Type of business entity

In a limited company, the liability of members or subscribers of the company is limited to what they have invested or guaranteed to the company. Limited companies may be limited by shares or by guarantee. In a company limited by shares, the liability of members is limited to the unpaid value of shares. In a company limited by guarantee, the liability of owners is limited to such amount as the owners may undertake to contribute to the assets of the company, in the event of being wound up. The former may be further divided in public companies and private companies. Who may become a member of a private limited company is restricted by law and by the company's rules. In contrast, anyone may buy shares in a public limited company.

A joint venture (JV) is a business entity created by two or more parties, generally characterized by shared ownership, shared returns and risks, and shared governance. Companies typically pursue joint ventures for one of four reasons: to access a new market, particularly Emerging market; to gain scale efficiencies by combining assets and operations; to share risk for major investments or projects; or to access skills and capabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Private limited company</span> Type of company used in many jurisdictions

A private limited company is any type of business entity in "private" ownership used in many jurisdictions, in contrast to a publicly listed company, with some differences from country to country. Examples include the LLC in the United States, private company limited by shares in the United Kingdom, GmbH in Germany and Austria, société à responsabilité limitée in France, and sociedad de responsabilidad limitada in the Spanish-speaking world. The benefit of having a private limited company is that there is limited liability. However, shares can only be sold to shareholders in the business, which means that it can be difficult to liquidate such a company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporate law</span> Body of law that governs businesses

Corporate law is the body of law governing the rights, relations, and conduct of persons, companies, organizations and businesses. The term refers to the legal practice of law relating to corporations, or to the theory of corporations. Corporate law often describes the law relating to matters which derive directly from the life-cycle of a corporation. It thus encompasses the formation, funding, governance, and death of a corporation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Limited liability</span> Business structure where shareholders cannot owe more than their stake in a venture

Limited liability is a legal status in which a person's financial liability is limited to a fixed sum, most commonly the value of a person's investment in a corporation, company or partnership. If a company that provides limited liability to its investors is sued, then the claimants are generally entitled to collect only against the assets of the company, not the assets of its shareholders or other investors. A shareholder in a corporation or limited liability company is not personally liable for any of the debts of the company, other than for the amount already invested in the company and for any unpaid amount on the shares in the company, if any, except under special and rare circumstances permitting "piercing the corporate veil." The same is true for the members of a limited liability partnership and the limited partners in a limited partnership. By contrast, sole proprietors and partners in general partnerships are each liable for all the debts of the business.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Privately held company</span> Business with a small number of owners

A privately held company is a company whose shares and related rights or obligations are not offered for public subscription or publicly negotiated in the respective listed markets but rather the company's stock is offered, owned, traded, exchanged privately, or over-the-counter. In the case of a closed corporation, there are relatively few shareholders or company members. Related terms are a closely held corporation, unquoted company, and unlisted company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Limited partnership</span> Form of partnership

A limited partnership (LP) is a form of partnership similar to a general partnership except that while a general partnership must have at least two general partners (GPs), a limited partnership must have at least one GP and at least one limited partner. Limited partnerships are distinct from limited liability partnerships, in which all partners have limited liability.

A gōdō gaisha (合同会社), or gōdō kaisha, abbreviated GK, is a type of business organization in the Companies Act of Japan modeled after the American limited liability company (LLC), hence its nickname as the "Japanese LLC". It is a type of mochibun kaisha distinguished by offering limited liability for all investors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Company</span> Association or collection of individuals

A company, abbreviated as co., is a legal entity representing an association of people, whether natural, legal or a mixture of both, with a specific objective. Company members share a common purpose and unite to achieve specific, declared goals. Companies take various forms, such as:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom company law</span> Law that regulates corporations formed under the Companies Act 2006

The United Kingdom company law regulates corporations formed under the Companies Act 2006. Also governed by the Insolvency Act 1986, the UK Corporate Governance Code, European Union Directives and court cases, the company is the primary legal vehicle to organise and run business. Tracing their modern history to the late Industrial Revolution, public companies now employ more people and generate more of wealth in the United Kingdom economy than any other form of organisation. The United Kingdom was the first country to draft modern corporation statutes, where through a simple registration procedure any investors could incorporate, limit liability to their commercial creditors in the event of business insolvency, and where management was delegated to a centralised board of directors. An influential model within Europe, the Commonwealth and as an international standard setter, UK law has always given people broad freedom to design the internal company rules, so long as the mandatory minimum rights of investors under its legislation are complied with.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States corporate law</span> Overview of United States corporate law

United States corporate law regulates the governance, finance and power of corporations in US law. Every state and territory has its own basic corporate code, while federal law creates minimum standards for trade in company shares and governance rights, found mostly in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by laws like the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The US Constitution was interpreted by the US Supreme Court to allow corporations to incorporate in the state of their choice, regardless of where their headquarters are. Over the 20th century, most major corporations incorporated under the Delaware General Corporation Law, which offered lower corporate taxes, fewer shareholder rights against directors, and developed a specialized court and legal profession. Nevada has attempted to do the same. Twenty-four states follow the Model Business Corporation Act, while New York and California are important due to their size.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Arab Emirates corporate law</span>

United Arab Emirates corporate law regulates the governance, finance and power of corporations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) through UAE law. Every emirate has its own basic corporate code.

References

  1. "Commercial Law - Vietnam". Asiapedia. Dezan Shira and Associates.
  2. Law on Enterprises
  3. Law on Securities
  4. Law on Investment
  5. Library of Congress, F. R. (1987). Vietnam Country Study. Retrieved August, 2011, from http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/vntoc.html
  6. Asian Development Bank. (2011). Economy of Vietnam - An Overview. Retrieved August, 2011, from 44th Annual Meeting, Board of Governors, Asian Development Bank: "Economy of Vietnam - an Overview". Archived from the original on 2011-03-26. Retrieved 2011-08-28.
  7. Bai, X. H. (2006). Vietnamese Company Law: The Development and Corporate Governance Issues. Bond Law Review , 25.
  8. Bai, X. H., & Walker, G. (2005). Transitional Adjustment Problems in Contemporary Vietnamese Company Law. Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation , 567-576.
  9. Nicholson, P. (2007). Borrowing Court Systems - The Experience of Socialist Vietnam. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, at 47
  10. Nicholson, P. (2007). Borrowing Court Systems - The Experience of Socialist Vietnam. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Appendix 6
  11. Articles 38 and 63, Law of Enterprises 2005.
  12. Article 63, Law of Enterprises 2005.
  13. Article 38, Law of Enterprises 2005.
  14. Article 46, Law on Enterprises 2005.
  15. Article 77(1)(b), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  16. Article 77(1)(c), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  17. Article 95, Law on Enterprises 2005.
  18. Article 130(1)(a), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  19. Article 130(1)(c), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  20. Article 130(1)(b), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  21. Article 135, Law on Enterprises 2005.
  22. Article 143(4), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  23. Article 143(1), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  24. Article 141(1), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  25. Article 141(3), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  26. Article 7, Law on Enterprises 2005
  27. Article 65, Law on Enterprises 2005
  28. Article 39(1) Law of Enterprises 2005
  29. Such prohibitions are laid down in Article 45(6).
  30. Article 11, Securities Law 2006
  31. Article 12, Securities Law 2006
  32. Article 47(1), Law on Enterprises 2005
  33. Article 68(1), Law on Enterprises 2005
  34. Article 96(1), Law on Enterprises 2005
  35. Article 108(1), Law on Enterprises 2005
  36. Article 47(2), Law on Enterprises 2005
  37. Article 96(2), Law on Enterprises 2005
  38. Article 104(2), Law on Enterprises 2005
  39. Article 52(2), Law on Enterprises 2005
  40. Article 68(6), Law on Enterprises 2005
  41. Article 116 (2), Law on Enterprises 2005
  42. Article 55(1), Law on Enterprises 2005
  43. Article 70(1), Law on Enterprises 2005
  44. Article 70(3), Law on Enterprises 2005
  45. Article 111 (1), Law on Enterprises 2005
  46. 1 2 Article 71, Law on Enterprises 2005
  47. Article 121, Law on Enterprises 2005
  48. 1 2 Article 71(4), Law on Enterprises 2005
  49. Article 122(2), Law on Enterprises 2005
  50. Article 50(5), Law on Enterprises 2005
  51. Article 41(1g), Law on Enterprises 2005
  52. 1 2 Le Minh, Toan and Walker, Gordon (2008) "Corporate Governance of Listed Companies in Vietnam," Bond Law Review: Vol. 20: Iss.2, Article 6.
  53. 1 2 Article 120(2), Law on Enterprises 2005
  54. 1 2 Article 4(17), Law on Enterprises 2005.
  55. Article 120 Section 3, Law on Enterprises 2005
  56. Vietnam - A Guide for Business and Investment, 2008, PriceWaterHouseCoopers
  57. Article 21, Law on Investment 2005
  58. Article 21 (1), Law on Investment 2005
  59. Article 21 (2), Law on Investment 2005
  60. Article 52, Law on Investment 2005
  61. Vietnam –Open for Business?, http://www.business-in-asia.com/vn_industrial.html Archived 2011-08-21 at the Wayback Machine
  62. Article 21 (3), Law on Investment 2005
  63. Article 21 (4), Law on Investment 2005
  64. Article 23 (2), Law on Investment 2005
  65. Katharina Pistor et al, 'The Evolution of Corporate Law: A Cross‐Country Comparison' (2003) 23(4) University of Pennsylvania, Journal of International Economic Law 791, 19,
  66. Xuan Hai, Bui, and Nunoi, Chihiro, Corporate Governance in Vietnam: A System in Transition, Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce and Management 42 (2008), pp.45-65.
  67. See, e.g. ss 198C(1), 198(1) of the Corporation Act 2001 (C th) of Australia.
  68. See, e.g. American Law Institute, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations (Vol. 1, 1994) s.305, Part III‐A (ss 3A.01‐3A.05).
  69. Jonathan P. Charkham (1994). Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries. Oxford University Press. pp. 14–21
  70. Allen, Franklin; Zhao, Mengxin (May 13, 2007). "The Corporate Governance Model of Japan: Shareholders are not Rulers" (PDF). Wharton Finance.
  71. Decree No. 95/2006/ND-CP of Government dated Sept. 8, 2006
  72. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-28. Retrieved 2011-08-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  73. "Poor governance led to Vinashin's financial wrongdoings | VietNam Today". Archived from the original on 2012-03-27. Retrieved 2011-08-28.