Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution

Last updated

The Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution (abbreviated KTR), also known as the Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution (ATR) by authors who consider it to have lasted into the Paleogene, [1] describes the intense floral diversification of flowering plants (angiosperms) and the coevolution of pollinating insects (especially anthophilans and lepidopterans), as well as the subsequent faunal radiation of various frugivorous, nectarivorous and insectivorous terrestrial animals then at the lower food web levels such as mammals, avialans (early birds and close relatives), squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes), lissamphibians (especially frogs) and web-spinning spiders, during the Cretaceous period. [2]

Contents

After the K-Pg extinction event devastated the Mesozoic terrestrial ecosystems and wiped out nearly all animals weighing more than 25 kg (55 lb), [3] the survivors among these smaller animals that thrived during the KTR recovered first to reoccupy the ecological niches vacated by the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs, and therefore became the dominant clades of the Cenozoic terrestrial faunas. Flowering plants also quickly became the mainstream florae during the Cenozoic, replacing the previously more prevalent gymnosperms and ferns.

Duration

The KTR is traditionally considered to have started in the Early Cretaceous and continued to the Late Cretaceous, [4] from around 125 Mya to 80 Mya. [2] Alternatively, according to Michael Benton, the ATR is proposed to have lasted from 100 Ma, when the first highly diverse angiosperm leaf floras are known, to 50 Ma, during the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum, by which point most crown lineages of angiosperms had evolved. [1]

Appearance of angiosperms

Molecular clock analyses of angiosperm evolution suggest that crown group angiosperms may have diverged up to 100 million years before the start of the KTR, although this is possibly due to artefacts of the inabilities of molecular clock estimates to account for explosive accelerations in evolution that may have caused the extremely fast diversification of angiosperms shortly after their first appearance in the fossil record. [5]

Causes

The KTR was enabled by the dispersed positions of the continents and the formation of new oceans during the Cretaceous in the aftermath of Pangaea's breakup in the preceding Jurassic period, which enhanced the hydrological cycle and promoted the expansion of temperate climatic zones, fuelling radiations of angiosperms. [6] Among mammals, enhanced tectonic activity generated diversity increases by increasing montane habitats, which promote increased diversity in hot climates. [7]

Another cause of the explosive angiosperm diversification was the evolution of leaf vein densities greater than 2.5–5 mm/mm2, when the leaf interior transport path length of water became shorter than the leaf interior transport path length of CO2. This enabled greater utilisation of CO2 and gave an evolutionary advantage to flowering plants over conifers because they could sequester more CO2 for the same amount of water. [8] The much greater capacity of angiosperms for assimilating CO2 sharply increased global bioproductivity. [9]

The drying of many terrestrial ecosystems during the Middle Cretaceous Hothouse (MKH) benefitted angiosperms, which were able to survive hot and dry environments, and the increased fire activity helped to enhance diversification of angiosperms. [10] Angiosperms enabled more frequent fires than gymnosperms, and they also recovered more quickly from fires than gymnosperms did. This created a feedback loop that advantaged angiosperms over gymnosperms during the Cretaceous. [11]

Biotic effects

Although angiosperm diversity drastically grew over the Cretaceous, this did not necessarily translate to ecological dominance, which they only achieved in the Early Cenozoic. [12] Angiosperms responded to increasing coevolution with frugivores by enlarging the sizes of their fruits, which peaked during the Early Eocene. [13]

Before Lloyd et al.'s 2008 paper described the KTR, it had been widely accepted in paleontology that new families of dinosaurs evolved during the Middle to Late Cretaceous, including the euhadrosaurs, neoceratopsians, ankylosaurids, pachycephalosaurs, carcharodontosaurines, troodontids, dromaeosaurs and ornithomimosaurs. However, the authors of the paper have suggested that the apparent "new diversification" of dinosaurs during this time is due to sampling biases in the fossil record, and better preserved fossils in Cretaceous age sediments than in earlier Triassic or Jurassic sediments. [2] Furthermore, the diversification of different dinosaur clades during the Cretaceous does not correlate with angiosperm diversity increases. [14] However, later studies still suggest the possibility that the KTR caused a rise in dinosaur diversity. [15] Dinosaurs contributed little to angiosperm diversification, which was instead mainly driven by coevolution with other animals, such as insects and herbivorous mammals. [16] It has been suggested that some pterosaurs may have been seed dispersers symbiotically linked to angiosperms. [17] A comprehensive molecular study of evolution of mammals at the taxonomic level of family also showed important diversification during the KTR. [18] Mammals diversified extensively during the KTR, [19] but also decreased in disparity. [20]

Insect diversity overall appears to have been minimally affected by the KTR, as molecular evidence shows that the increase in diversity of pollinating insects was asynchronous with the KTR. [21] Spikes in both insect origination and extinction rates during the KTR were correlated with high global temperatures. [22] However, Early Cretaceous angiosperms were short in stature and would have been heavily reliant on insect pollination, [12] and fossil remains of early angiosperms suggest such a dependence on zoophilous pollination. [23] There is also evidence suggesting that terrestrial arthropods may have preferentially preyed on angiosperms. [24] Genetic evidence indicates a major radiation of phasmatodeans occurred during the KTR, likely in response to a coeval radiation of enantiornitheans and other visual predators. [25] Ants likewise underwent massive increase in diversity as part of the KTR. [26] Similarly, bee pollinator diversification strongly correlates with angiosperm flower appearance and specialization during the same era. [27] Flies, already successful pollinators before the rise of angiosperms, [28] quickly adapted to the new hosts. [29] Beetles became pollinators of angiosperms by the earliest part of the Late Cretaceous. [30] [31] Lepidopterans radiated during the KTR, though the angiosperm radiation is insufficient in and of itself to completely account for their diversification. [32] Among one lineage of sawflies, there was a change in preferred host plants amidst the biotic reorganisation of the KTR. [33] Not all insects were advantaged by this diversification and rearrangement of ecosystems; long-proboscid insects that were mainstays of gymnosperm-dominated ecosystems earlier in the Mesozoic underwent a major decline. [34] Late-surviving eoblattodeans evolved long, slim bodies with long external ovipositors in response to the angiosperm radiation, but this proved to be an evolutionary dead end in the long run and the group went extinct. [35] The so-called "golden age" of neuropterans during the Middle Mesozoic, when gymnosperms dominated the flora, ended with the KTR and its reshaping of the terrestrial environment. [34] Mesoraphidiids went extinct during the KTR, likely due to the habitat preference of their larvae of gymnosperms, although alloraphidiine mesoraphidiids increased in disparity in the Late Cretaceous in response to the KTR. [36]

The KTR may have supercharged the contemporary Mesozoic Marine Revolution (MMR) by enhancing weathering and erosion, accelerating the flow of limiting nutrients into the world’s oceans. [37]

For nearly the entirety of Earth's history, including most of the Phanerozoic eon, marine species diversity exceeded terrestrial species diversity, a pattern which was reversed during the Middle Cretaceous as a result of the KTR in what has been termed a biological "great divergence", named after the historical Great Divergence. [38]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 Benton, Michael James; Wilf, Peter; Sauquet, Hervé (26 October 2021). "The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution and the origins of modern biodiversity". New Phytologist . 233 (5): 2017–2035. doi:10.1111/nph.17822. hdl: 1983/82a09075-31f4-423e-98b9-3bb2c215e04b . PMID   34699613. S2CID   240000207 . Retrieved 24 November 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 Lloyd, G. T.; et al. (2008). "Dinosaurs and the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution. 2008". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences . 275 (1650): 2483–2490. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0715. PMC   2603200 . PMID   18647715.
  3. Muench, David; Muench, Marc; Gilders, Michelle A. (2000). Primal Forces. Portland, Oregon: Graphic Arts Center Publishing. p. 20. ISBN   978-1-55868-522-2.
  4. Friis, Else Marie; Crane, Peter R.; Pedersen, Kaj Raunsgaard (3 April 2024). "The Cretaceous diversification of angiosperms: perspectives from mesofossils" . Geological Society, London, Special Publications . 544 (1). doi:10.1144/SP544-2023-170. ISSN   0305-8719 . Retrieved 13 February 2025 via Lyell Collection, Geological Society Publications.
  5. Barba-Montoya, Jose; Dos Reis, Mario; Schneider, Harald; Donoghue, Philip C. J.; Yang, Ziheng (5 February 2018). "Constraining uncertainty in the timescale of angiosperm evolution and the veracity of a Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution". New Phytologist . 218 (2): 819–834. Bibcode:2018NewPh.218..819B. doi:10.1111/nph.15011. PMC   6055841 . PMID   29399804.
  6. Gurung, Khushboo; Field, Katie J.; Batterman, Sarah J.; Goddéris, Yves; Donnadieu, Yannick; Porada, Philipp; Taylor, Lyla L.; Mills, Benjamin J. W. (4 August 2022). "Climate windows of opportunity for plant expansion during the Phanerozoic". Nature Communications . 13 (1): 4530. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.4530G. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32077-7. PMC   9352767 . PMID   35927259.
  7. Weaver, Lucas N.; Kelson, Julia R.; Holder, Robert M.; Niemi, Nathan A.; Badgley, Catherine (January 2024). "On the role of tectonics in stimulating the Cretaceous diversification of mammals" . Earth-Science Reviews . 248: 104630. Bibcode:2024ESRv..24804630W. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104630 . Retrieved 11 October 2024 via Elsevier Science Direct.
  8. de Boer, Hugo Jan; Eppinga, Maarten B.; Wassen, Martin J.; Dekker, Stefan C. (27 November 2012). "A critical transition in leaf evolution facilitated the Cretaceous angiosperm revolution". Nature Communications . 3 (1): 1221. Bibcode:2012NatCo...3.1221D. doi:10.1038/ncomms2217. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   3514505 . PMID   23187621.
  9. Boyce, C. Kevin; Zwieniecki, Maciej A. (26 June 2012). "Leaf fossil record suggests limited influence of atmospheric CO 2 on terrestrial productivity prior to angiosperm evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 109 (26): 10403–10408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203769109 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   3387114 . PMID   22689947.
  10. Zhang, Mingzhen; Dai, Shuang; Du, Baoxia; Ji, Liming; Hu, Shusheng (25 October 2018). "Mid-Cretaceous Hothouse Climate and the Expansion of Early Angiosperms" . Acta Geologica Sinica. 92 (5): 2004–2025. Bibcode:2018AcGlS..92.2004Z. doi:10.1111/1755-6724.13692. ISSN   1000-9515 . Retrieved 11 October 2024 via Wiley Online Library.
  11. Bond, William J.; Midgley, Jeremy J. (July 2012). "Fire and the Angiosperm Revolutions" . International Journal of Plant Sciences . 173 (6): 569–583. doi:10.1086/665819. ISSN   1058-5893 . Retrieved 25 June 2024 via The University of Chicago Press Journals.
  12. 1 2 Friis, E.M.; Pedersen, K. Raunsgaard; Crane, P.R. (22 March 2006). "Cretaceous angiosperm flowers: Innovation and evolution in plant reproduction" . Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology . 232 (2–4): 251–293. Bibcode:2006PPP...232..251F. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.006 . Retrieved 20 May 2024 via Elsevier Science Direct.
  13. Eriksson, Ove (20 December 2014). "Evolution of angiosperm seed disperser mutualisms: the timing of origins and their consequences for coevolutionary interactions between angiosperms and frugivores" . Biological Reviews . 91 (1): 168–186. doi:10.1111/brv.12164. ISSN   1464-7931. PMID   25530412 . Retrieved 25 June 2024 via Wiley Online Library.
  14. Benton, Michael James (15 November 2023). "The dinosaur boom in the Cretaceous". Geological Society, London, Special Publications . 544 (1). Bibcode:2023GSLSP.544...70B. doi: 10.1144/SP544-2023-70 . ISSN   0305-8719 . Retrieved 13 February 2025 via Lyell Collection Geological Society Publications.
  15. Benton, Michael J. (15 November 2023). "The dinosaur boom in the Cretaceous". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 544 (1): 70. Bibcode:2023GSLSP.544...70B. doi: 10.1144/SP544-2023-70 . ISSN   0305-8719.
  16. Barrett, Paul M.; Willis, Katherine J. (24 August 2001). "Did dinosaurs invent flowers? Dinosaur—angiosperm coevolution revisited" . Biological Reviews . 76 (3): 411–447. doi:10.1017/S1464793101005735. ISSN   1464-7931. PMID   11569792 . Retrieved 25 June 2024 via Cambridge Core.
  17. Fleming, Theodore H.; Lips, Karen R. (October 1991). "Angiosperm Endozoochory: Were Pterosaurs Cretaceous Seed Dispersers?" . The American Naturalist . 138 (4): 1058–1065. Bibcode:1991ANat..138.1058F. doi:10.1086/285269. ISSN   0003-0147 . Retrieved 30 June 2024 via The University of Chicago Press Journals.
  18. Meredith, Robert W. (2011). "Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg Extinction on Mammal Diversification". Science . 334 (6055): 521–524. Bibcode:2011Sci...334..521M. doi:10.1126/science.1211028. PMID   21940861. S2CID   38120449.
  19. Meredith, Robert W.; Janečka, Jan E.; Gatesy, John; Ryder, Oliver A.; Fisher, Colleen A.; Teeling, Emma C.; Goodbla, Alisha; Eizirik, Eduardo; Simão, Taiz L. L.; Stadler, Tanja; Rabosky, Daniel L.; Honeycutt, Rodney L.; Flynn, John J.; Ingram, Colleen M.; Steiner, Cynthia; Williams, Tiffani L.; Robinson, Terence J.; Burk-Herrick, Angela; Westerman, Michael; Ayoub, Nadia A.; Springer, Mark S.; Murphy, William J. (28 October 2011). "Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg Extinction on Mammal Diversification" . Science . 334 (6055): 521–524. Bibcode:2011Sci...334..521M. doi:10.1126/science.1211028. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   21940861 . Retrieved 13 February 2025.
  20. Grossnickle, David M.; Polly, P. David (22 November 2013). "Mammal disparity decreases during the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences . 280 (1771): 20132110. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2110. ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   3790494 . PMID   24089340.
  21. Asar, Yasmin; Ho, Simon Y.W.; Sauquet, Hervé (11 May 2022). "Early diversifications of angiosperms and their insect pollinators: were they unlinked?" . Trends in Plant Science. 27 (9): 858–869. Bibcode:2022TPS....27..858A. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.04.004. PMID   35568622 . Retrieved 30 June 2024.
  22. Peris, David; Condamine, Fabien L. (22 January 2024). "The angiosperm radiation played a dual role in the diversification of insects and insect pollinators". Nature Communications . 15 (1): 552. Bibcode:2024NatCo..15..552P. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44784-4. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   10803743 . PMID   38253644.
  23. Hu, Shusheng; Dilcher, David L.; Jarzen, David M.; Winship Taylor, David (8 January 2008). "Early steps of angiosperm–pollinator coevolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 105 (1): 240–245. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105..240H. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707989105 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   2224194 . PMID   18172206.
  24. Santos, Artai A.; McLoughlin, Stephen; Rubalcava-Knoth, Marco A.; Hernández-Damián, Ana L.; Villanueva-Amadoz, Uxue; Cevallos-Ferriz, Sergio R. S. (10 July 2024). "Plant-insect interactions in the mid-Cretaceous paleotropical El Chango Lagerstätte (Cintalapa Fm., Mexico)—patterns of herbivory during the Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution . 12. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1381539 . ISSN   2296-701X.
  25. Tihelka, Erik; Cai, Chenyang; Giacomelli, Mattia; Pisani, Davide; Donoghue, Philip C. J. (11 November 2020). "Integrated phylogenomic and fossil evidence of stick and leaf insects (Phasmatodea) reveal a Permian–Triassic co-origination with insectivores". Royal Society Open Science . 7 (11): 201689. Bibcode:2020RSOS....701689T. doi:10.1098/rsos.201689. PMC   7735357 . PMID   33391817.
  26. Jouault, Corentin; Condamine, Fabien L.; Legendre, Frédéric; Perrichot, Vincent (11 March 2024). "The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution buffered ants against extinction". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 121 (13): e2317795121. Bibcode:2024PNAS..12117795J. doi:10.1073/pnas.2317795121. ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   10990090 . PMID   38466878.
  27. Cardinal, S.; Straka, J.; Danforth, B. N. (2010). "Comprehensive phylogeny of apid bees reveals the evolutionary origins and antiquity of cleptoparasitism". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 107 (37): 16207–11. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10716207C. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006299107 . PMC   2941306 . PMID   20805492.
  28. Peñalver, Enrique; Arillo, Antonio; Pérez-de la Fuente, Ricardo; Riccio, Mark L.; Delclòs, Xavier; Barrón, Eduardo; Grimaldi, David A. (9 July 2015). "Long-Proboscid Flies as Pollinators of Cretaceous Gymnosperms". Current Biology . 25 (14): 1917–1923. Bibcode:2015CBio...25.1917P. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.062 . PMID   26166781 . Retrieved 20 May 2024.
  29. Zhang, Qingqing; Wang, Bo (24 April 2017). "Evolution of Lower Brachyceran Flies (Diptera) and Their Adaptive Radiation with Angiosperms". Frontiers in Plant Science . 8: 631. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00631 . ISSN   1664-462X. PMC   5401883 . PMID   28484485.
  30. Bao, Tong; Wang, Bo; Li, Jianguo; Dilcher, David (3 December 2019). "Pollination of Cretaceous flowers". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 116 (49): 24707–24711. Bibcode:2019PNAS..11624707B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916186116 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   6900596 . PMID   31712419.
  31. Tihelka, Erik; Li, Liqin; Fu, Yanzhe; Su, Yitong; Huang, Diying; Cai, Chenyang (12 April 2021). "Angiosperm pollinivory in a Cretaceous beetle" . Nature Plants . 7 (4): 445–451. Bibcode:2021NatPl...7..445T. doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00893-2. ISSN   2055-0278. PMID   33846595 . Retrieved 20 May 2024.
  32. Pellmyr, Olle (February 1992). "Evolution of insect pollination and angiosperm diversification" . Trends in Ecology & Evolution . 7 (2): 46–49. Bibcode:1992TEcoE...7...46P. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90105-K. PMID   21235949 . Retrieved 20 May 2024.
  33. Schneider, Harald (28 January 2016). "The ghost of the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution in the evolution of fern–sawfly associations" . Journal of Systematics and Evolution . 54 (2): 93–103. doi:10.1111/jse.12194. ISSN   1674-4918 . Retrieved 11 May 2024 via Wiley Online Library.
  34. 1 2 Lu, Xiu-Mei; Zhang, Wei-Wei; Liu, Xing-Yue (5 May 2016). "New long-proboscid lacewings of the mid-Cretaceous provide insights into ancient plant-pollinator interactions". Scientific Reports . 6 (1): 25382. Bibcode:2016NatSR...625382L. doi:10.1038/srep25382. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   4857652 . PMID   27149436.
  35. Li, Xin-Ran; Huang, Di-Ying (29 March 2023). "Atypical 'long-tailed' cockroaches arose during Cretaceous in response to angiosperm terrestrial revolution". PeerJ . 11: e15067. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15067 . ISSN   2167-8359. PMC   10066690 . PMID   37013144.
  36. Lu, Xiumei; Stubbs, Thomas L; Zhuo, De; Xu, Chunpeng; Donoghue, Philip C J; Liu, Xingyue (1 July 2024). Beutel, Rolf (ed.). "New Cretaceous snakeflies highlight the morphological disparity of Mesoraphidiidae and its response to the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution" . Insect Systematics and Diversity . 8 (4). doi:10.1093/isd/ixae016. ISSN   2399-3421 . Retrieved 13 February 2025 via Oxford Academic.
  37. Boyce, C. Kevin; Lee, Jung-Eun (1 June 2011). "Could Land Plant Evolution Have Fed the Marine Revolution?" . Paleontological Research. 15 (2): 100–105. doi: 10.2517/1342-8144-15.2.100 . ISSN   1342-8144 . Retrieved 29 September 2023.
  38. Vermeij, Geerat J.; Grosberg, Richard K. (2 July 2010). "The Great Divergence: When Did Diversity on Land Exceed That in the Sea?" . Integrative and Comparative Biology . 50 (4): 675–682. doi: 10.1093/icb/icq078 . PMID   21558232 . Retrieved 1 October 2022.