Democrat Party (epithet)

Last updated

Democrat Party is an epithet and pejorative for the Democratic Party of the United States, [1] [2] [3] often used in a disparaging fashion by the party's opponents. [4] While use of the term started out as non-hostile, it has grown in its negative use since the 1940s, in particular by members of the Republican Party—in party platforms, partisan speeches, and press releases—as well as by conservative commentators and third party politicians. [5] [6] [7]

Contents

Modern usage

United Press International reported in August 1984 that the term Democrat Party had been employed "in recent years by some right-wing Republicans" because the party's Democratic name implied that the Democrats were "the only true adherents of democracy". [8]

Language expert Roy Copperud said it was used by Republicans who disliked the implication that Democratic Party implied to listeners that Democrats "are somehow the anointed custodians of the concept of democracy". [9] According to Oxford Dictionaries, the use of Democrat rather than the adjective Democratic "is in keeping with a longstanding tradition among Republicans of dropping the –ic in order to maintain a distinction from the broader, positive associations of the adjective democratic with democracy and egalitarianism". [10]

Political commentator William Safire wrote in 1993 that the Democrat of Democrat Party "does conveniently rhyme with autocrat, plutocrat, and worst of all, bureaucrat". [11] In 2006, Hendrik Hertzberg wrote in The New Yorker : [12]

There's no great mystery about the motives behind this deliberate misnaming. "Democrat Party" is a slur, or intended to be—a handy way to express contempt. Aesthetic judgments are subjective, of course, but "Democrat Party" is jarring verging on ugly. It fairly screams "rat".

Republican pollster Frank Luntz tested the phrase with a focus group in 2001, and concluded that the only people who really disliked the epithet were highly partisan Democrats. [12] Political analyst Charlie Cook attributed modern use of the term to force of habit rather than a deliberate epithet by Republicans. [13] Journalist Ruth Marcus stated that Republicans likely only continue to employ the term because Democrats dislike it, [1] and Hertzberg calls use of the term "a minor irritation" and also "the partisan equivalent of flashing a gang sign". [12]

Nicole Holliday has described it as demonstrating affiliation, and said "“Language is contagious, especially emotionally charged political language," ... “Most of the time, we don’t have the cognitive bandwidth to think very hard about every single word that we’re using. We just use it because it’s what other people do." Larry Glickma commented that lack of awareness "shows how normalized it’s become" comparing it to a "schoolyard taunt". [14]

Grammar

Among authors of dictionaries and usage guides who state that the use of Democrat as an adjective is ungrammatical are Roy H. Copperud, [9] Bergen Evans, [15] and William and Mary Morris. In particular, the latter have written: "It is the idiotic creation of some of the least responsible members of the Republican Party." [16]

In 2005, Ruth Walker, who has been the long-time language columnist for The Christian Science Monitor, [17] while stating that Democratic is the correct term in most instances, placed the adjectival use of Democrat within a broader trend:

We're losing our inflections—the special endings we use to distinguish between adjectives and nouns, for instance. There's a tendency to modify a noun with another noun rather than an adjective. Some may speak of 'the Ukraine election' rather than 'the Ukrainian election' or 'the election in Ukraine', for instance. It's 'the Iraq war' rather than 'the Iraqi war', to give another example. [18]

In 2012, the British magazine The Economist stated:

The real reason 'Democrat Party' is wrong is not because it's ungrammatical, but because it's incorrect in another way—the party is simply not named the Democrat Party, but the Democratic Party. Calling it anything else is discourteous. [19]

History

19th century

In American history, many parties were named by their opponents (Federalists, Loco-Focos, Know Nothings, Populists, Dixiecrats), including the Democrats themselves, as the Federalists in the 1790s used Democratic Party as a term of ridicule. [20]

Addressing a gathering of Michigan Republicans in 1889, New Hampshire Republican Congressman Jacob H. Gallinger said:

The great Democrat party, laying down the sceptre of power in 1860, after ruling this country under free trade for a quarter of a century, left our treasury bankrupt, and gave as a legacy to the Republican party, a gigantic rebellion and a treasury without a single dollar of money in it. [21]

According to the Oxford English Dictionary , the term was used by the press in London, England, as a synonym for the more common Democratic Party in 1890:

Whether a little farmer from South Carolina named Tillman is going to rule the Democrat Party in America—yet it is this, and not output, on which the proximate value of silver depends. [22]

Early 20th century

The 1919 New Teachers' and Pupils' Cyclopaedia entry for Woodrow Wilson states that "In 1912, Wilson was the Democrat Party nominee for President ..." [23] On July 14, 1922, a newspaper in Keytesville, Missouri, posted an advertisement for its primary elections with the Democratic candidates identified as "Representing: Democrat Party". [24]

Late 20th century

The noun-as-adjective has been used by Republican leaders since the 1940s, and in most GOP national platforms since 1948 and began being popularized by Brazilla Carroll Reece in 1946. [25] By the early 1950s, the term was in widespread use among Republicans of all factions. [26] When Senator Thruston Ballard Morton became chairman of the Republican National Committee in 1959, he indicated that he had always said Democratic Party and would continue to do so, which contrasted with his predecessor, Meade Alcorn, and with National Republican Senatorial Committee chairman Barry Goldwater, both of whom used Democrat Party. [27] According to Congressional Quarterly , at the 1968 Republican National Convention "the GOP did revert to the epithet of 'Democrat' party. The phrase had been used in 1952 and 1956 but not in 1960 and 1964". [3]

According to William Safire, Minnesota Governor Harold Stassen, campaign manager to Republican Wendell Willkie during the 1940 presidential campaign, explained that because the Democratic Party was at that time partly controlled by undemocratic city bosses, "by Hague in New Jersey, Pendergast in Missouri and Kelly-Nash in Chicago, [it] should not be called a 'Democratic Party.' It should be called the 'Democrat Party.'" [28]

Columnist Russell Baker wrote in 1976:

The origin of this illiterate phrase, goes back, I believe to the era of Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy ... The chief trouble with "the Democrat party" is that it makes the Republicans saying it sound both illiterate and coy, and, so, is like a shotgun that is all kick and no fire ... A party whose membership is down to 22 percent of the electorate, as the Republican party is, hardly needs ways to irritate voters from the opposing party whom it must seduce if it is to succeed. [29]

During the 1984 Republican National Convention, use of the term was a point of contention among the delegates. [30] When a member of the Republican platform committee asked unanimous consent to change the phrasing of a platform amendment to read Democrat Party instead of Democratic Party, New York Representative Jack Kemp objected, saying that would be "an insult to our Democratic friends;" the committee dropped the proposal. [8]

Newt Gingrich, in his efforts in the 1980s and 1990s to produce a Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives, relied heavily on words and phrases that cast Democrats in a negative light. [31] The phrase Democrat Party gained new currency when the Republican Party, led by Gingrich, gained control of the House of Representatives in 1994. [2]

In 1996, the wording throughout the Republican Party platform was changed from Democratic Party to Democrat Party: Republican leaders "explained they wanted to make the subtle point that the Democratic Party had become elitist". [32] A proposal to use the term in the August 2008 Republican platform for similar reasons was voted down, with leaders choosing to use Democratic Party. "We probably should use what the actual name is," said Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, the panel's chairman. "At least in writing." [32]

21st century

Following his inauguration in 2001, President George W. Bush often used the noun-as-adjective when referring to the Democratic Party. [33] Ruth Marcus, an opinion writer and columnist for The Washington Post , wrote in 2006, "The derisive use of 'Democrat' in this way was a Bush staple during the recent campaign". [1]

Bush spoke of the "Democrat majority" in his 2007 State of the Union Address, although the advance copy that was given to members of Congress read "Democratic majority". [13] [34] Democrats complained about the use of Democrat as an adjective in the address; John Podesta, White House Chief of Staff under Bush's predecessor Bill Clinton, said it was "like nails on a chalkboard", although congressional historian Julian E. Zelizer has opined that "It's hard to disentangle whether that's an intentional slight". [13] Political analyst Charlie Cook doubted it was a deliberate attempt to offend Democrats, saying Republicans "have been [using the term] so long that they probably don't even realize they're doing it". [13]

Bush joked about the issue in a February 4, 2007 speech to House Democrats, stating "Now look, my diction isn't all that good. I have been accused of occasionally mangling the English language. And so I appreciate you inviting the head of the Republic Party." [35] [36]

Donald Trump has used the phrase repeatedly, both during his presidential campaign and as president. [37] In a July 2018 campaign rally, he said that "The Democratic Party sounds too good so I don't want to use that, OK?" He added, "I call it the Democrat Party. It sounds better rhetorically." [38] At a September 2018 rally he suggested that "When you see 'Democratic Party,' it's wrong. There's no name, 'Democratic Party.'" [39] At the Conservative Political Action Conference in 2019, he stated he liked to say, "the 'Democrat Party,' because it doesn't sound good. But that's all the more reason I use it, because it doesn't." [40] During the first White House Coronavirus Task Force press conference, he advanced this usage with, "... governors including Democratic—or Democrat, as I call them—governors—which is actually the correct term." [41]

During the 2020 United States presidential election, a conservative advocacy group created the website "Democrat Voters Against Joe Biden", in an apparent attempt to respond to Republican Voters Against Trump. According to The Daily Beast , the former found only one registered Democrat for its testimonies by September 2020; The Daily Beast opined that the name of the organization is a clue that its founders were unfamiliar with how registered Democrats refer to themselves. [42] Deliberate usage of the term as an epithet accelerated in the late 2010s and 2020s. [43]

Media organizations

According to the left-leaning media watchdog Media Matters for America, the "ungrammatical" and "partisan" use of the phrase Democrat Party has "echoed Republicans" with its use in the Associated Press, CNN , The New York Times , The Wall Street Journal , and the Chicago Tribune . [44]

NPR directed its staff in 2010 to use the adjective Democratic rather than Democrat. [45] According to Ron Elving, NPR's senior Washington editor, it was the organization's policy to call parties by the name that they use to refer to themselves, saying: "We should not refer to Democrat ideas or Democrat votes. Any deviation from that by NPR reporters on air or online should be corrected". [46]

Responses

In the mid-1950s, members of the Democratic National Committee proposed using "Publican Party" instead of "Republican Party". The committee failed to accept the proposal, "explaining that Republican is the name by which our opponents' product is known and mistrusted". [47] Sherman Yellen suggested "The Republicants" as suitably comparable in terms of negative connotation in an April 29, 2007, Huffington Post column. [48]

On the February 26, 2009 edition of Hardball with Chris Matthews , California Republican Representative Darrell Issa referred to "a Democrat Congress". The host, Chris Matthews, responded by saying:

Well, I think the Democratic Party calls itself the Democratic Party, not the Democrat Party. Do we have to do this every night? Why do people talk like this? Is this just fighting words to get the name on? [49]

Issa denied that he intended to use "fighting words", to which Matthews replied, "They call themselves the Democratic Party. Let's just call people what they call themselves and stop the Mickey Mouse here—save that for the stump." [49]

In March 2009, after Representative Jeb Hensarling (R–Texas) repeatedly used the phrase Democrat Party when questioning U.S. Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag, Representative Marcy Kaptur (D–Ohio) said:

I'd like to begin by saying to my colleague from Texas that there isn't a single member on this side of the aisle that belongs to the "Democrat Party". We belong to the Democratic Party. So the party you were referring to doesn't even exist. And I would just appreciate the courtesy when you're referring to our party ... to refer to it as such. [50]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Marcus, Ruth (November 22, 2006). "One Syllable of Civility". The Washington Post. p. A21.
  2. 1 2 Schlesinger, Robert (2008). White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters . New York: Simon and Schuster. p.  96. ISBN   978-0-7432-9169-9. democrat epithet.
  3. 1 2 "Republicans Adopt Moderate Stance in 1968 Platform" . CQ Almanac 1968 (24th ed.). 1969. ISSN   0095-6007. 19-984-19-986. Platform analysts noted that, while the 1968 version was not as highly critical of the Administration as the 1964 model, the GOP did revert to the epithet of 'Democrat' party. The phrase had been used in 1952 and 1956 but not in 1960 and 1964.
  4. ↑ Siegal, Allan M.; Connolly, William (2015). The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage (5th ed.). Crown/Archetype. ISBN   978-1-10-190322-3.
  5. ↑ Taranto, James (September 23, 2011). "Could Nader Hurt Obama?". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved February 1, 2021.
  6. ↑ Safire (1993), pp. 163f.
  7. ↑ "What's in an adjective? 'Democrat Party' label on the rise". AP NEWS. February 27, 2021. Retrieved February 28, 2021.
  8. 1 2 "Democrats Find Ally In Republican Camp". The New York Times. United Press International. August 17, 1984.
  9. 1 2 Copperud (1980), pp. 101–2.
  10. ↑ Martin, K. C. (November 4, 2014). "What are the most common American political insults?". OxfordWords Blog. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on March 3, 2017. Retrieved March 3, 2017.
  11. ↑ Safire, William (1996). "Oh Hell, What's in an Adverb?". National Journal. Vol. 28, no. 27–52. Washington, DC. p. 1615.
  12. 1 2 3 Hertzberg, Hendrik (August 7, 2006). "The 'Ic' Factor". The New Yorker . Retrieved April 12, 2017.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Copleand, Libby (January 25, 2007). "President's Sin of Omission? (Dropped Syllable in Speech Riles Democrats)". The Washington Post . Retrieved March 31, 2007.
  14. ↑ Cantor, Matthew (September 5, 2024). "The strangest insult in US politics: why do Republicans call it 'the Democrat party'?". The Guardian. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
  15. ↑ Copperud (1980), p. 101.
  16. ↑ Morris, William; Morris, Mary (1975). Harper Dictionary of Contemporary Usage, p. 176.
  17. ↑ Fuller, Linda K. (2011). The Christian Science Monitor: An Evolving Experiment in Journalism. ABC-CLIO. p. 81. ISBN   978-0-313-37994-9.
  18. ↑ Walker, Ruth (January 27, 2005). "Republicans, Democrats, and the Afghan on the Couch". Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on March 12, 2007.
  19. ↑ R.L.G. (February 15, 2012). "Names: What's wrong with the "Democrat Party". The Economist.
  20. ↑ Safire (1993), p. 176.
  21. ↑ Michigan Club, Detroit (1890). Proceedings... Annual Meeting of the Michigan Club: 1889. p. 43.
  22. ↑ Oxford English Dictionary under "Democrat" 4 citing the London Spectator November 15, 1890 p. 676.
  23. ↑ Holst, Bernhart Paul (1919). The New Teachers' and Pupils' Cyclopaedia. Vol. VI. Chicago: Holst Publishing Company. p. 3158.
  24. ↑ Chariton County Clerk (July 14, 1922). "Notice of Primary Election". Chariton Courier. Keytesville, Mo. p. 6.
  25. ↑ Glickman, Lawrence B. (January 21, 2023). "The Real Origins of the "Democrat Party" Troll". Slate . Retrieved January 21, 2023.
  26. ↑ Feuerlicht, Ignace (October 1957). "Democrat Party". American Speech. 32 (3): 228–31. doi:10.2307/453829. JSTOR   453829. OCLC   67159091.
  27. ↑ Donovan, Robert J. (April 18, 1959). "Big Change: Morton To Say Democratic, Not Democrat Party" . Cincinnati Enquirer. Cincinnati, Ohio. Herald Tribune News Service. p. 1.
  28. ↑ Safire (1988), p. 35.
  29. ↑ Baker, Russell (September 5, 1976). "Democrat Party? — Suggestion for GOP: Drop the Illiterate Phrase" . Fort Lauderdale News and Sun-Sentinel. Fort Lauderdale, Fla. New York Times News Service. p. 3E.
  30. ↑ Raum, Tom (August 28, 1984). "What's in a Name?" . Del Rio News Herald. Del Rio, Tex. Associated Press. p. 4.
  31. ↑ Braswell, Sean (July 15, 2016). "Newt is Back: Can He Raise Trump's Rhetorical Game?". Ozy.com. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
  32. 1 2 Woodward, Calvin (August 26, 2008). "No More 'Democrat Wars' for GOP Spinmeisters?". USA Today. Associated Press.
  33. ↑ AP Staff (July 23, 2004). "Bush Courts Black Voters at Urban League". Associated Press (AP). Retrieved April 12, 2017– via FoxNews.com.
  34. ↑ Office of the Press Secretary (January 23, 2007). "President Bush Delivers State of the Union Address". WhiteHouse.Archives.gov. Archived from the original on May 2, 2013. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
  35. ↑ Abramowitz, Michael; Kane, Paul (February 4, 2007). "At Democrats' Meeting, Bush Appeals for Cooperation". The Washington Post . Retrieved March 31, 2007.
  36. ↑ Levey, Noam H. (February 4, 2007). "Bush reaches across partisan divide". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
  37. ↑ Lutz, Eric (October 21, 2017). "There may be a reason Trump keeps saying "Democrat" instead of "Democratic" in his attacks on party". Mic.
  38. ↑ "This is a rush transcript from 'The Story'". Fox News. July 5, 2018. Archived from the original on July 6, 2018. Retrieved July 6, 2018.
  39. ↑ Blahut, Mitchell (September 29, 2018). "Fact-checking Donald Trump's rally in Wheeling, W.Va". PolitiFact. Retrieved September 30, 2018.
  40. ↑ By Paul Farhi "'The Democrat Party': Trump needles the opposition by truncating its name" The Washington Post March 7, 2019
  41. ↑ "False claim: Trump said "hundreds of governors" are calling him". Reuters . April 24, 2020. Retrieved August 24, 2022.
  42. ↑ Markay, Lachlan (September 16, 2020). "'Democrat Voters Against Joe Biden' Group Has Trump Fanatics, a Psychic, but No Actual Dems". The Daily Beast.
  43. ↑ Smyth, Julie Carr (February 27, 2021). "What's in an adjective? 'Democrat Party' label on the rise". Associated Press . Retrieved January 21, 2023.
  44. ↑ Brown, Joe (August 16, 2006). "GOP Strategists Christen 'Democrat [sic] Party' — and the Media Comply". MediaMatters.org. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
  45. ↑ Nelson (2016), pp. 99–100.
  46. ↑ Shepard, Alicia C. (March 26, 2010). "Ombudsman, "Since When Did It Become the Democrat Party?"". NPR. Archived from the original on March 24, 2012. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
  47. ↑ Safire (1993), pp. 163–164.
  48. ↑ Yellen, Sherman (April 29, 2007). "The Republicants". Huffington Post. Retrieved October 25, 2010.
  49. 1 2 Mullins, Anne Schroeder (February 26, 2009). "Don't Call Democrats, Democrats!". Politico.com . Retrieved April 12, 2017.
  50. ↑ Frick, Ali (March 3, 2009). "Rep. Kaptur Scolds GOP: 'Democrat Party' Doesn't Exist". ThinkProgress.org. Retrieved March 4, 2009.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republican Party (United States)</span> American political party

The Republican Party, also known as the GOP, is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. It emerged as the main political rival of the then-dominant Democratic Party in the 1850s, and the two parties have dominated American politics since then.

An adjective is a word that describes or defines a noun or noun phrase. Its semantic role is to change information given by the noun.

The Free World is a propaganda term, primarily used during the Cold War from 1945 to 1991, to refer to the Western Bloc and aligned countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rockefeller Republican</span> Political ideology within the US Republican Party

The Rockefeller Republicans were members of the United States Republican Party (GOP) in the 1930s–1970s who held moderate-to-liberal views on domestic issues, similar to those of Nelson Rockefeller, Governor of New York (1959–1973) and Vice President of the U.S. (1974–1977). Rockefeller Republicans were most common in the Northeast and the industrial Midwestern states, while they were rare in the South and the West.

Republicrat or Demopublican are portmanteau names for both of the two major political parties in the United States, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, collectively. These derogatory names first appeared in the 1872 United States presidential election.

Compassionate conservatism is an American political philosophy that stresses using conservative techniques and concepts in order to improve the general welfare of society. The philosophy supports the implementation of policies designed to help the disadvantaged and alleviate poverty through the free market, envisaging a triangular relationship between government, charities and faith-based organizations. The term entered mainstream parlance between 2001 and 2009, during the administration of US President George W. Bush. He used the term often to describe his personal views and embody some parts of his administration's agenda and policy approach.

An epithet, also a byname, is a descriptive term commonly accompanying or occurring in place of the name of a real or fictitious person, place, or thing. It is usually literally descriptive, as in Alfred the Great, Suleiman the Magnificent, Richard the Lionheart, and Ladislaus the Short, or allusive, as in Edward the Confessor, William the Conqueror, Æthelred the Unready, John Lackland, Mehmed the Conqueror and Bloody Mary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republican in name only</span> Pejorative term to describe some Republican politicians

In US politics, "Republican in name only" is a pejorative used to describe politicians of the Republican Party deemed insufficiently loyal to the party, or misaligned with the party's ideology. Similar terms have been used since the early 1900s. The acronym RINO became popular in the 1990s, and both the acronym and the full spelling have become commonly used by President-elect Donald Trump and his supporters to refer to his critics within the Republican Party.

In politics, a front-runner is a leader in an electoral race. While the front-runner in athletic events is generally clear, a political front-runner, particularly in the presidential primary process, is less so as a potential nominee may lead in the polls, have the most name recognition, the most funds raised, or a combination of these. The front-runner is most often declared by the media who are following the race and is written about in a different style than his or her challengers.

A useful idiot or useful fool is a pejorative description of a person, suggesting that the person thinks they are fighting for a cause without fully comprehending the consequences of their actions, and who does not realize they are being manipulated by the cause's leaders or by other political players. The term was often used during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and psychological manipulation. A number of authors attribute this phrase to Vladimir Lenin, but this attribution is not supported by any evidence. Similar terms exist in other languages.

In politics, a dog whistle is the use of coded or suggestive language in political messaging to garner support from a particular group without provoking opposition. The concept is named after ultrasonic dog whistles, which are audible to dogs but not humans. Dog whistles use language that appears normal to the majority but communicates specific things to intended audiences. They are generally used to convey messages on issues likely to provoke controversy without attracting negative attention.

A compound modifier is a compound of two or more attributive words: that is, two or more words that collectively modify a noun. Compound modifiers are grammatically equivalent to single-word modifiers and can be used in combination with other modifiers.

Cut and run or cut-and-run is an idiomatic verb phrase meaning to "make off promptly" or to "hurry off". The phrase was in use by the 1700s to describe an act allowing a ship to make sail quickly in an urgent situation, by cutting free an anchor. Though initially referring to a literal act, the phrase was used figuratively by the mid-1800s in both the United States and England. The phrase is used pejoratively in political language, implying a panicked and cowardly retreat, and it has been used by politicians as a criticism of calls to withdraw troops from various armed conflicts, becoming particularly associated with the Iraq War and with the diction of the United States Republican Party. It has also been used in other contexts, such as in World War II military slang and to refer to a container shipping practice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Republican Party (United States)</span>

The Republican Party, also known as the GOP, is one of the two major political parties in the United States. It is the second-oldest extant political party in the United States after its main political rival, the Democratic Party. In 1854, the Republican Party emerged to combat the expansion of slavery into western territories after the passing of the Kansas–Nebraska Act. The early Republican Party consisted of northern Protestants, factory workers, professionals, businessmen, prosperous farmers, and after the Civil War also of former black slaves. The party had very little support from white Southerners at the time, who predominantly backed the Democratic Party in the Solid South, and from Irish and German Catholics, who made up a major Democratic voting block. While both parties adopted pro-business policies in the 19th century, the early GOP was distinguished by its support for the national banking system, the gold standard, railroads, and high tariffs. The party opposed the expansion of slavery before 1861 and led the fight to destroy the Confederate States of America (1861–1865). While the Republican Party had almost no presence in the Southern United States at its inception, it was very successful in the Northern United States, where by 1858 it had enlisted former Whigs and former Free Soil Democrats to form majorities in nearly every Northern state.

"Wingnut", wing nut or wing-nut, is a pejorative American political term referring to a person who holds extreme, and often irrational, political views. It is a reference to the extreme "wings" of a party, and shares a name with the hardware fastener also known as a wingnut.

A false, coined, fake, bogus or pseudo-title, also called a Time-style adjective and an anarthrous nominal premodifier, is a kind of preposed appositive phrase before a noun predominantly found in journalistic writing. It formally resembles a title, in that it does not start with an article, but is a common noun phrase, not a title. An example is the phrase convicted bomber in "convicted bomber Timothy McVeigh", rather than "the convicted bomber Timothy McVeigh".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of modern American conservatism</span>

This timeline of modern American conservatism lists important events, developments and occurrences that have affected conservatism in the United States. With the decline of the conservative wing of the Democratic Party after 1960, the movement is most closely associated with the Republican Party (GOP). Economic conservatives favor less government regulation, lower taxes and weaker labor unions while social conservatives focus on moral issues and neoconservatives focus on democracy worldwide. Conservatives generally distrust the United Nations and Europe and apart from the libertarian wing favor a strong military and give enthusiastic support to Israel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English determiners</span> Determiners in the English language

English determiners are words – such as the, a, each, some, which, this, and numerals such as six – that are most commonly used with nouns to specify their referents. The determiners form a closed lexical category in English.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English adjectives</span> Adjectives in the English language

English adjectives form a large open category of words in English which, semantically, tend to denote properties such as size, colour, mood, quality, age, etc. with such members as other, big, new, good, different, Cuban, sure, important, and right. Adjectives head adjective phrases, and the most typical members function as modifiers in noun phrases. Most adjectives either inflect for grade or combine with more and most to form comparatives and superlatives. They are characteristically modifiable by very. A large number of the most typical members combine with the suffix -ly to form adverbs. Most adjectives function as complements in verb phrases, and some license complements of their own.

The platform of the Republican Party of the United States has historically been based on American conservatism, contrasting with the modern liberalism of the Democratic Party. The positions of the Republican Party have evolved over time. Currently, the party's fiscal conservatism includes support for lower taxes, gun rights, government conservatism, free market capitalism, free trade, deregulation of corporations, and restrictions on labor unions. The party's social conservatism includes support for gun rights outlined in the Second Amendment, the death penalty, and other traditional values, often with a Christian foundation, including restrictions on abortion. In foreign policy, Republicans usually favor increased military spending, strong national defense, and unilateral action. Other Republican positions include opposition to illegal immigration, drug legalization, pornography and affirmative action, as well as support for school choice, and school prayer.

References

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.