Diesel Emissions Reduction Act

Last updated

The Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (Pub.L. 111-364), or DERA (as it will be referred to for the remainder of this article), is a part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub.L. 109-58). The law appropriated funds to federal and state loan programs to either rebuild diesel-powered vehicle engines to more stringent emission standards or install emission reduction systems, notify affected parties, and share the technological information with countries that have poor air quality standards. [1]

Contents

Provisions

National grant and loan programs

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was charged with distributing DERA’s funds. 70% of these available funds are to provide grants and low-cost revolving loans. These loans are issued on a competitive basis to maximize reductions in diesel emissions in terms of number of tons of pollution and emissions exposure. DERA highlights that areas with a dense population of fleet vehicles and designated by the EPA as low air quality areas should receive priority for these funds. [1]

DERA also stipulates that at least 50% of the funds available should be distributed to public vehicle fleets. Of the total appropriated funds, 90% must be used for projects that use existing certified engine technology, or verified configuration, and that 10% should be used for developing and commercializing new technologies. Test plans for new technologies should be submitted to the EPA or California Air Resources Board (CARB). [1]

The funds cover retrofit engine technology for buses, medium-duty trucks, heavy-duty trucks, marine engines, locomotives, off-road engines or construction vehicles, cargo handlers, agricultural equipment, mining equipment, and energy production equipment. The funds are appropriated only for voluntary reduction of emissions and cannot be used to meet the requirements of any federal, state, or local laws for emissions standards. Additionally, states cannot themselves mandate the elective emissions reductions. [1]

State grant and loan programs

In addition to national loan programs, DERA made 30% of federally appropriated funds available to support state grant and loan programs that are designed to curb diesel emissions. These funds are designed to help the states meet diesel emissions reductions through the use of certified engine configurations or verified technologies only. This does not cover research and development of new technologies as in the federal grant program. States can apply for this aid through the EPA, which reviews the application and decides if a state is eligible for a monetary allocation. If all 50 states qualify for funding, each state receives 2% of the appropriated funds for the state grant and loan program. However, if all 50 states do not qualify, each qualifying state receives 2% plus a share that is population-dependent for that state. A state that matches the funds appropriated by DERA receives an incentive payment equal to 50% of the funds allocated by the state. [1]

Evaluation and report

DERA required the EPA to submit to Congress a report regarding the implementation of the federal and state grant and loan programs a year after funds were appropriated. [1] The EPA released this report in August 2009, reporting its success of reducing 46,000 tons of nitrogen oxide emissions and 2,200 tons of fine particulate matter. This was reported as a public health benefit between $580 million and $1.4 billion and saved operators 3.2 million US gallons (12,000 m3) of fuel in 2008 (a cost savings of $8 million). The report stated that upwards of 14,000 diesel-powered engines were made cleaner under DERA, two-thirds of those being trucks and school buses through EPA sector outreach programs. [2]

Outreach and incentives

The effect of DERA required that the EPA inform entities that are eligible or potentially eligible for federal and state programs. The resultant movement was the National Clean Diesel Campaign (NCDC). [3] DERA also requires that the EPA share the technological resources regarding the retrofitting and modification of diesel engines to reduce emissions with foreign countries that have poor air quality standards. [1]

Interaction with other laws

DERA clearly stipulates that any provisions made does not supersede any authority of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401–7626) on or before DERA's effective date. [1]

Legislative history

The Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2010 was first introduced as the 5809 bill seen by the 111th House of Representatives. It was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 21, 2010. It passed the House on September 22, 2010, and then moved on to the Senate. However, the Senate already had a bill in progress that did basically the same thing that H.R. 5809 did. That bill was the Voinovich-Carper Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2010, which was the 3973 bill heard by the 111th Senate. S.3973 was first introduced to the Senate on November 18, 2010, but never made it passed the Senate floor. Possibly because The Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2010 (H.R. 5809) was already making its way in the Senate. Ultimately the DERA that passed and became law was the one that was introduced by the House. [4] [5]

National Clean Diesel Campaign

The National Clean Diesel Campaign focuses on the health of Americans due to the exhaust emissions from diesel engines; specifically nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. It includes regulations for new diesel engines, voluntary programs for the existing diesel fleet, diesel emission reduction technologies and strategies, and current collaboratives and partnerships. [6]

Differences in provisions of original bill and law in 2005

In July 2005, Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator for Region 9 of the EPA, initially proposed the idea of a Diesel Emissions Reduction in the 109th Congress, 1st session. Nastri focuses on the negative health effects that diesel has on the environment. He concludes that diesel fuel, when burned, emits both nitrogen oxides and particulate matters. Nitrogen oxides contribute to smog, while the particle matter contributes to illness in humans. Nastri even states that diesel exhaust is a likely carcinogen. Nastri concludes his address by stating that even through the current efforts of the Clean Diesel Emissions Campaign, it will take a staggering amount of money that the EPA does not have. He acknowledges this however, and states he looks forward to working with the members of the Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate Change & Nuclear Safety of the Committee on Environment & Public Works to reduce the health effects of diesel exhaust. [7]

Differences in provisions of DERA 2005 and DERA 2010

Under this renewal, DERA would be active until 2016, and the legislation would attempt to modify the program by adding a competitive bidding process for groups seeking funding. This bill would eligibility requirements for grants and low-cost loans to include individual owners and other private entities that manage diesel fleets and are contractors with the federal government. It would also require 95% of funds appropriated to be expanded in a given year on grants to eligible program participants. The bill would not authorize $100 million annually from fiscal year 2012 through 2016. [8]

Support

The Emissions Control Technology Association (ECTA), a coalition of a few hundred organizations that range from state and local government entities, to non-profit organizations and even private businesses and corporations, was one of the largest supporters of ECTA. On September 17, 2010, ECTA wrote a letter on behalf of its member organizations thanking Senators George Voinovich (R) and Tom Carper (D – Delaware) for their bipartisan efforts in helping pass the 2010 renewal of DERA. This was a success for ECTA, whose mission is to achieve higher air quality through public policy that curbs harmful emissions. In the letter, ECTA states that more than $20 in healthcare savings is generated for every dollar spent on DERA, yielding a high cost-benefit ratio. [9]

Implementation

On January 5, 2017, the EPA announced that it was awarding more than $7.7 million to replace or retrofit 401 older diesel school buses from 88 school bus fleets in 27 states. Since 2008, the program has funded over 700 clean diesel projects across the country, reducing emissions in more than 70,000 engines. [10]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Environmental Protection Agency</span> U.S. federal government agency

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is an independent agency of the United States government tasked with environmental protection matters. President Richard Nixon proposed the establishment of EPA on July 9, 1970; it began operation on December 2, 1970, after Nixon signed an executive order. The order establishing the EPA was ratified by committee hearings in the House and Senate.

The Clear Skies Act of 2003 was a proposed federal law of the United States. The official title as introduced is "a bill to amend the Clean Air Act to reduce air pollution through expansion of cap-and-trade programs, to provide an alternative regulatory classification for units subject to the cap and trade program, and for other purposes."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vehicle emission standard</span> Legal requirements governing air pollutants released into the atmosphere

Emission standards are the legal requirements governing air pollutants released into the atmosphere. Emission standards set quantitative limits on the permissible amount of specific air pollutants that may be released from specific sources over specific timeframes. They are generally designed to achieve air quality standards and to protect human life. Different regions and countries have different standards for vehicle emissions.

A State Implementation Plan (SIP) is a United States state plan for complying with the federal Clean Air Act, administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The SIP, developed by a state agency and approved by EPA, consists of narrative, rules, technical documentation, and agreements that an individual state will use to control and clean up polluted areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollution prevention in the US</span>

Pollution prevention (P2) is a strategy for reducing the amount of waste created and released into the environment, particularly by industrial facilities, agriculture, or consumers. Many large corporations view P2 as a method of improving the efficiency and profitability of production processes through waste reduction and technology advancements. Legislative bodies have enacted P2 measures, such as the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 in the United States Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States</span> Climate changing gases from the North American country

The United States produced 5.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020, the second largest in the world after greenhouse gas emissions by China and among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person. In 2019 China is estimated to have emitted 27% of world GHG, followed by the United States with 11%, then India with 6.6%. In total the United States has emitted a quarter of world GHG, more than any other country. Annual emissions are over 15 tons per person and, amongst the top eight emitters, is the highest country by greenhouse gas emissions per person. However, the IEA estimates that the richest decile in the US emits over 55 tonnes of CO2 per capita each year. Because coal-fired power stations are gradually shutting down, in the 2010s emissions from electricity generation fell to second place behind transportation which is now the largest single source. In 2020, 27% of the GHG emissions of the United States were from transportation, 25% from electricity, 24% from industry, 13% from commercial and residential buildings and 11% from agriculture. In 2021, the electric power sector was the second largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for 25% of the U.S. total. These greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to climate change in the United States, as well as worldwide.

The Not-To-Exceed (NTE) standard promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ensures that heavy-duty truck engine emissions are controlled over the full range of speed and load combinations commonly experienced in use. NTE establishes an area under the torque curve of an engine where emissions must not exceed a specified value for any of the regulated pollutants. The NTE test procedure does not involve a specific driving cycle of any specific length. Rather it involves driving of any type that could occur within the bounds of the NTE control area, including operation under steady-state or transient conditions and under varying ambient conditions. Emissions are averaged over a minimum time of thirty seconds and then compared to the applicable NTE emission limits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act of 2007</span> Green industrial policy bill in the 110th Congress introduced by Bernie Sanders

The Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act of 2007 (S. 309) was a bill proposed to amend the 1963 Clean Air Act, a bill that aimed to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2). U.S. Senator, Bernie Sanders (I-VT), introduced the resolution in the 110th United States Congress on January 16, 2007. The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works but was not enacted into law.

United States vehicle emission standards are set through a combination of legislative mandates enacted by Congress through Clean Air Act (CAA) amendments from 1970 onwards, and executive regulations managed nationally by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and more recently along with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). These standard cover common motor vehicle air pollution, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate emissions, and newer versions have incorporated fuel economy standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clean Air Act (United States)</span> 1963 United States federal law to control air pollution

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the United States' primary federal air quality law, intended to reduce and control air pollution nationwide. Initially enacted in 1963 and amended many times since, it is one of the United States' first and most influential modern environmental laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Clean Energy and Security Act</span> Proposed United States climate and energy legislation (Waxman-Markey); never passed

The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES) was an energy bill in the 111th United States Congress that would have established a variant of an emissions trading plan similar to the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. The bill was approved by the House of Representatives on June 26, 2009, by a vote of 219–212. With no prospect of overcoming a threatened Republican filibuster, the bill was never brought to the floor of the Senate for discussion or a vote. The House passage of the bill was the "first time either house of Congress had approved a bill meant to curb the heat-trapping gases scientists have linked to climate change."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Idle (engine)</span>

Idling refers to running a vehicle's engine and the vehicle is not in motion, or when the vehicle drops to its resting point of RPMs. This commonly occurs when drivers are stopped at a red light, waiting while parked outside a business or residence, or otherwise stationary with the engine running. When idling, the engine runs without any loads except the engine accessories, and without the additional fuel via the gas pedal. If the vehicle moves while in gear and idling, The "idle speed" mechanically should be adjusted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air quality law</span> Type of law

Air quality laws govern the emission of air pollutants into the atmosphere. A specialized subset of air quality laws regulate the quality of air inside buildings. Air quality laws are often designed specifically to protect human health by limiting or eliminating airborne pollutant concentrations. Other initiatives are designed to address broader ecological problems, such as limitations on chemicals that affect the ozone layer, and emissions trading programs to address acid rain or climate change. Regulatory efforts include identifying and categorising air pollutants, setting limits on acceptable emissions levels, and dictating necessary or appropriate mitigation technologies.

The Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment Program is a State of California engine retrofit and replacement program implemented through the cooperative efforts of local air districts such as the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and the California Air Resources Board (ARB). The BAAQMD's Carl Moyer Program is managed by the Air District's Strategic Incentives Division (SID). The program provides grant funding to encourage the voluntary purchase of cleaner-than-required engines, equipment, and emission reduction technologies in an effort to rapidly reduce air pollution. While regulations continue to be the primary means to reduce air pollution emissions, the Carl Moyer Program plays a complementary role to California’s regulatory program by funding emission reductions that are surplus, that is, early and/or in excess of what is required by regulation.

United States policy in regard to biofuels, such as ethanol fuel and biodiesel, began in the early 1990s as the government began looking more intensely at biofuels as a way to reduce dependence on foreign oil and increase the nation's overall sustainability. Since then, biofuel policies have been refined, focused on getting the most efficient fuels commercially available, creating fuels that can compete with petroleum-based fuels, and ensuring that the agricultural industry can support and sustain the use of biofuels.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began regulating greenhouse gases (GHGs) under the Clean Air Act from mobile and stationary sources of air pollution for the first time on January 2, 2011. Standards for mobile sources have been established pursuant to Section 202 of the CAA, and GHGs from stationary sources are currently controlled under the authority of Part C of Title I of the Act. The basis for regulations was upheld in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in June 2012.

The California Statewide Truck and Bus Rule was initially adopted in December 2008 by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and requires all heavy-duty diesel trucks and buses that operate in California to retrofit or replace engines in order to reduce diesel emissions. All privately and federally owned diesel-fueled trucks and buses, and privately and publicly owned school buses with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 14,000 pounds, are covered by the regulation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mobile source air pollution</span> Air pollution emitted by motor vehicles, airplanes, locomotives, and other engines

Mobile source air pollution includes any air pollution emitted by motor vehicles, airplanes, locomotives, and other engines and equipment that can be moved from one location to another. Many of these pollutants contribute to environmental degradation and have negative effects on human health. To prevent unnecessary damage to human health and the environment, environmental regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have established policies to minimize air pollution from mobile sources. Similar agencies exist at the state level. Due to the large number of mobile sources of air pollution, and their ability to move from one location to another, mobile sources are regulated differently from stationary sources, such as power plants. Instead of monitoring individual emitters, such as an individual vehicle, mobile sources are often regulated more broadly through design and fuel standards. Examples of this include corporate average fuel economy standards and laws that ban leaded gasoline in the United States. The increase in the number of motor vehicles driven in the U.S. has made efforts to limit mobile source pollution challenging. As a result, there have been a number of different regulatory instruments implemented to reach the desired emissions goals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defeat device</span> Illegal methods in motor vehicles to overcome emissions controls

A defeat device is any motor vehicle hardware, software, or design that interferes with or disables emissions controls under real-world driving conditions, even if the vehicle passes formal emissions testing. The term appears in the US Clean Air Act and European Union regulations, to describe anything that prevents an emissions control system from working, and applies as well to power plants or other air pollution sources, as to automobiles.

West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court relating to the Clean Air Act, and the extent to which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can regulate carbon dioxide emissions related to climate change.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Energy Policy Act of 2005 Title VII, Subtitle G, Sections 791-797. August 8, 2005.
  2. ↑ United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 2009. Report to Congress: Highlights of the Diesel Emissions Reduction Program. Retrieved April 21, 2011 from http://epa.gov/cleandiesel/documents/420r09006.pdf Archived 2011-02-04 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ↑ United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Working together for clean air. National Clean Diesel Campaign (NCDC). Retrieved March 2, 2011, from http://www.epa.gov/diesel
  4. ↑ "Actions - H.R.5809 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2010". 4 January 2011.
  5. ↑ "All Info - S.3973 - 111th Congress (2009-2010): Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2010". 20 December 2010.
  6. ↑ United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). National Clean Diesel Campaign Fact Sheet(NCDC). Retrieved April 10, 2011 from http://www.epa.gov/cleandiesel/documents/420f05012.pdf
  7. ↑ Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2005, 109th Congress, 1st session. July 12, 2005.
  8. ↑ Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2010, 111th Congress, 2nd session. December 21, 2010.
  9. ↑ Coalition letter to Senators Carper and Voinovich. (2010, September 17). Reauthorization of Diesel Emissions Reduction Act. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://www.ectausa.com/documents/DERASenateFinalwAdd.pdf.
  10. ↑ "EPA Rebates Will Fund Cleaner School Buses in 88 Communities". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . Retrieved January 24, 2017.

External resources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.