Energy Policy Act of 2005

Last updated
Energy Policy Act of 2005
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Other short titles
  • Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 2005
  • Electricity Modernization Act of 2005
  • Energy Policy Tax Incentives Act of 2005
  • Energy Research, Development, Demonstration, and Commercial Application Act of 2005
  • Energy Tax Incentives Act of 2005
  • Federal Reformulated Fuels Act of 2005
  • Indian Tribal Energy Development and Self-Determination Act of 2005
  • EPAct 2005
  • John Rishel Geothermal Steam Act Amendments of 2005
  • National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program Act of 2005
  • No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act of 2005
  • NOPEC
  • Oil Shale, Tar Sands, and Other Strategic Unconventional Fuels Act of 2005
  • Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 2005
  • Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005
  • SAFE Act
  • Set America Free Act of 2005
  • Spark M. Matsunaga Hydrogen Act of 2005
  • Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act
Long titleAn Act to ensure jobs for our future with secure, affordable, and reliable energy.
Enacted bythe 109th United States Congress
EffectiveAugust 8, 2005
Citations
Public law 109-58
Statutes at Large 119  Stat.   594
Codification
Acts amended Energy Policy Act of 1992
Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) of 1978
Acts repealed Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935
Titles amended 16 U.S.C.: Conservation
42 U.S.C.: Public Health and Social Welfare
U.S.C. sections created 42 U.S.C. ch. 149 § 15801 et seq.
U.S.C. sections amended 16 U.S.C. ch. 46 § 2601 et seq.
42 U.S.C. ch. 134 § 13201 et seq.
Legislative history
Major amendments
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010

George W. Bush signing the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which was designed to promote US nuclear reactor construction, through incentives and subsidies, including cost-overrun support up to a total of $2 billion for six new nuclear plants. 2005 Energy Policy Act.jpg
George W. Bush signing the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which was designed to promote US nuclear reactor construction, through incentives and subsidies, including cost-overrun support up to a total of $2 billion for six new nuclear plants.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  109–58 (text) (PDF)) is a federal law signed by President George W. Bush on August 8, 2005, at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The act, described by proponents as an attempt to combat growing energy problems, changed US energy policy by providing tax incentives and loan guarantees for energy production of various types. The most consequential aspect of the law was to greatly increase ethanol production [2] to be blended with gasoline. The law also repealed the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, effective February 2006. [3]

Contents

Provisions

General provisions

Tax reductions by subject area

Change to daylight saving time

The law amended the Uniform Time Act of 1966 by changing the start and end dates of daylight saving time, beginning in 2007. Clocks were set ahead one hour on the second Sunday of March (March 11, 2007) instead of on the first Sunday of April (April 1, 2007). Clocks were set back one hour on the first Sunday of November (November 4, 2007), rather than on the last Sunday of October (October 28, 2007). This had the net effect of slightly lengthening the duration of daylight saving time.

Lobbyists for this provision included the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association, the National Association of Convenience Stores, and the National Retinitis Pigmentosa Foundation Fighting Blindness.

Lobbyists against this provision included the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, the National Parent-Teacher Association, the Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium, the Edison Electric Institute, and the Air Transport Association. [18] This section of the act is controversial; some have questioned whether daylight saving results in net energy savings. [19]

Commercial building deduction

The Act created the Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings Tax Deduction, a special financial incentive designed to reduce the initial cost of investing in energy-efficient building systems via an accelerated tax deduction under section §179D of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Many building owners are unaware that the [Policy Act of 2005] includes a tax deduction (§179D) for investments in "energy efficient commercial building property" designed to significantly reduce the heating, cooling, water heating and interior lighting cost of new or existing commercial buildings placed into service between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2013. §179D includes full and partial tax deductions for investments in energy efficient commercial building that are designed to increase the efficiency of energy-consuming functions. Up to $.60 for lighting, $.60 for HVAC and $.60 for building envelope, creating a potential deduction of $1.80 per sq/ft. Interior lighting may also be improved using the Interim Lighting Rule, which provides a simplified process to earn the Deduction, capped at $0.30-$0.60/square foot. Improvements are compared to a baseline of ASHRAE 2001 standards. [20]

To obtain these benefits the facilities/energy division of a business, its tax department, and a firm specializing in EPAct 179D deductions needed to cooperate. IRS mandated software had to be used and an independent 3rd party had to certify the qualification. For municipal buildings, benefits were passed through to the primary designers/architects in an attempt to encourage innovative municipal design.

The Commercial Buildings Tax Deduction expiration date had been extended twice, last by the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008. With this extension, the CBTD could be claimed for qualifying projects completed before January 1, 2014. [20] [21]

Energy management

The commercial building tax deductions [22] could be used to improve the payback period of a prospective energy improvement investment. The deductions could be combined by participating in demand response programs where building owners agree to curtail usage at peak times for a premium. The most common qualifying projects were in the area of lighting.

Energy savings

Summary of Energy Savings Percentages Provided by IRS Guidance [23]

Percentages permitted under Notice 2006-52 (Effective for property placed in service January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2008)

Percentages permitted under Notice 2008-40 (Effective for property placed in service January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2013)

Percentages permitted under Notice 2012-22

Effective date of Notice 2012-22 – December 31, 2013; if §179D is extended beyond December 31, 2013, is also effective (except as otherwise provided in an amendment of §179D or the guidance thereunder) during the period of the extension.

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) review of the conference version of the bill estimated the Act would increase direct spending by $2.2 billion over the 2006–2010 period, and by $1.6 billion over the 2006–2015 period. The CBO did not attempt to estimate additional effects on discretionary spending. The CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the legislation would reduce revenues by $7.9 billion over the 2005–2010 period and by $12.3 billion over the 2005–2015 period.[ citation needed ]

Support

The collective reduction in national consumption of energy (gas and electricity) is significant for home heating. The Act provided gible financial incentives (tax credits) for average homeowners to make environmentally positive changes to their homes. It made improvements to home energy use more affordable for walls, doors, windows, roofs, water heaters, etc. Consumer spending, and hence the national economy, was abetted. Industry grew for manufacture of these environmentally positive improvements. These positive improvements have been near and long-term in effect.

The collective reduction in national consumption of oil is significant for automotive vehicles. The Act provided tangible financial incentives (tax credits) for operators of hybrid vehicles. It helped fuel competition among auto makers to meet rising demands for fuel-efficient vehicles. Consumer spending, and hence the national economy, was abetted. Dependence on imported oil was reduced. The national trade deficit was improved. Industry grew for manufacture of these environmentally positive improvements. These positive improvements have been near and long-term in effect.

Criticism

Legislative history

The Act was voted on and passed twice by the United States Senate, once prior to conference committee, and once after. In both cases, there were numerous senators who voted against the bill. John McCain, the Republican Party nominee for President of the United States in the 2008 election voted against the bill. Democrat Barack Obama, President of the United States from January 2009 to January 2017, voted in favor of the bill.

Provisions in the original bill that were not in the act

To remove from 18 CFR Part 366.1 the definitions of "electric utility company" and exempt wholesale generator (EWG), that an EWG is not an electric utility company. [3]

Preliminary Senate vote

June 28, 2005, 10:00 a.m. Yeas - 85, Nays - 12

Conference committee

The bill's conference committee included 14 Senators and 51 House members. The senators on the committee were: Republicans Domenici, Craig, Thomas, Alexander, Murkowski, Burr, Grassley and Democrats Bingaman, Akaka, Dorgan, Wyden, Johnson, and Baucus.

Final Senate vote

July 29, 2005, 12:50 p.m. [28] Yeas - 74, Nays - 26

Legislative history

StageHouse of RepresentativesSenate
Initial Debate
IntroductionApril 18, 2005June 11
CommittedApril 18June 14
Committee Name(s)Energy and Commerce
Education and the Workforce
Financial Services
Agriculture
Resources
Science
Ways and Means
Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee StageApril 18 to 19
Committee ReportApril 19
Floor DebateApril 19 to 21June 14 to 23

Cloture invoked June 23, [29]

PassageApril 21, [30] June 28, [31]
Conference Stage
Conference Demanded/AcceptedJuly 13July 1
Conference MeetingsJuly 14 to 24
Report FiledJuly 27
Final Passage
Final DebateJuly 28July 28 to 29
Budget Act waived, July 29, [32]
Concurrence and PassageJuly 28, [33] July 29, [34]
Presented to PresidentAugust 4
SignedAugust 8

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy Policy Act of 1992</span>

The Energy Policy Act of 1992, effective October 24, 1992, is a United States government act. It was passed by Congress and set goals, created mandates, and amended utility laws to increase clean energy use and improve overall energy efficiency in the United States. The Act consists of twenty-seven titles detailing various measures designed to lessen the nation's dependence on imported energy, provide incentives for clean and renewable energy, and promote energy conservation in buildings.

The Energy Tax Act is a law passed by the U.S. Congress as part of the National Energy Act. The objective of this law was to shift from oil and gas supply toward energy conservation; thus, to promote fuel efficiency and renewable energy through taxes and tax credits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy policy of the United States</span>

The energy policy of the United States is determined by federal, state, and local entities. It addresses issues of energy production, distribution, consumption, and modes of use, such as building codes, mileage standards, and commuting policies. Energy policy may be addressed via legislation, regulation, court decisions, public participation, and other techniques.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy in Taiwan</span>

In 2022, 79.6% of Taiwan's electricity generation came from fossil fuels, 9.1% from nuclear, 8.6% from renewables, and 1.2% from hydro. Taiwan relies on imports for almost 98% of its energy, which leaves the island's energy supply vulnerable to external disruption. In order to reduce this dependence, the Ministry of Economic Affairs' Bureau of Energy has been actively promoting energy research at several universities since the 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy policy of the United Kingdom</span> United Kingdom legislation

The energy policy of the United Kingdom refers to the United Kingdom's efforts towards reducing energy intensity, reducing energy poverty, and maintaining energy supply reliability. The United Kingdom has had success in this, though energy intensity remains high. There is an ambitious goal to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in future years, but it is unclear whether the programmes in place are sufficient to achieve this objective. Regarding energy self-sufficiency, UK policy does not address this issue, other than to concede historic energy security is currently ceasing to exist.

The United States produces mainly biodiesel and ethanol fuel, which uses corn as the main feedstock. The US is the world's largest producer of ethanol, having produced nearly 16 billion gallons in 2017 alone. The United States, together with Brazil accounted for 85 percent of all ethanol production, with total world production of 27.05 billion gallons. Biodiesel is commercially available in most oilseed-producing states. As of 2005, it was somewhat more expensive than fossil diesel, though it is still commonly produced in relatively small quantities, in comparison to petroleum products and ethanol fuel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007</span> United States law

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, originally named the Clean Energy Act of 2007, is an Act of Congress concerning the energy policy of the United States. As part of the Democratic Party's 100-Hour Plan during the 110th Congress, it was introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Representative Nick Rahall of West Virginia, along with 198 cosponsors. Even though Rahall was 1 of only 4 Democrats to oppose the final bill, it passed in the House without amendment in January 2007. When the Act was introduced in the Senate in June 2007, it was combined with Senate Bill S. 1419: Renewable Fuels, Consumer Protection, and Energy Efficiency Act of 2007. This amended version passed the Senate on June 21, 2007. After further amendments and negotiation between the House and Senate, a revised bill passed both houses on December 18, 2007 and President Bush, a Republican, signed it into law on December 19, 2007, in response to his "Twenty in Ten" challenge to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% in 10 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy policy of Canada</span>

Canada has access to all main sources of energy including oil and gas, coal, hydropower, biomass, solar, geothermal, wind, marine and nuclear. It is the world's second largest producer of uranium, third largest producer of hydro-electricity, fourth largest natural gas producer, and the fifth largest producer of crude oil. In 2006, only Russia, the People's Republic of China, the United States and Saudi Arabia produce more total energy than Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States</span> Climate changing gases from the North American country

The United States produced 5.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020, the second largest in the world after greenhouse gas emissions by China and among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person. In 2019 China is estimated to have emitted 27% of world GHG, followed by the United States with 11%, then India with 6.6%. In total the United States has emitted a quarter of world GHG, more than any other country. Annual emissions are over 15 tons per person and, amongst the top eight emitters, is the highest country by greenhouse gas emissions per person.

Energy subsidies are measures that keep prices for customers below market levels, or for suppliers above market levels, or reduce costs for customers and suppliers. Energy subsidies may be direct cash transfers to suppliers, customers, or related bodies, as well as indirect support mechanisms, such as tax exemptions and rebates, price controls, trade restrictions, and limits on market access.

New Energy for America was a plan led by Barack Obama and Joe Biden beginning in 2008 to invest in renewable energy sources, reduce reliance on foreign oil, address global warming issues, and create jobs for Americans. The main objective of the New Energy for America plan was to implement clean energy sources in the United States to switch from nonrenewable resources to renewable resources. The plan led by the Obama Administration aimed to implement short-term solutions to provide immediate relief from pain at the pump, and mid- to- long-term solutions to provide a New Energy for America plan. The goals of the clean energy plan hoped to: invest in renewable technologies that will boost domestic manufacturing and increase homegrown energy, invest in training for workers of clean technologies, strengthen the middle class, and help the economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biofuels by region</span> Use of biofuel as energy source across the world

The use of biofuels varies by region. The world leaders in biofuel development and use are Brazil, United States, France, Sweden and Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy conservation in the United States</span> How power is used and saved by Americans

The United States is the second-largest single consumer of energy in the world. The U.S. Department of Energy categorizes national energy use in four broad sectors: transportation, residential, commercial, and industrial. Energy usage in transportation and residential sectors is largely controlled by individual domestic consumers. Commercial and industrial energy expenditures are determined by businesses entities and other facility managers. National energy policy has a significant effect on energy usage across all four sectors.

The United States has the second largest electricity sector in the world, with 4,178 Terawatt-hours of generation in 2023. In 2023 the industry earned $491b in revenue at an average price of $0.127/kWh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy policy of the Barack Obama administration</span> American presidential policy

The energy policy of the Obama administration was defined by an "all-of-the-above" approach which offered federal support for renewable energy deployment, increased domestic oil and gas extraction, and export of crude oil and natural gas. His presidency's first term was shaped by the failure of his signature climate legislation, the American Clean Energy and Security Act, to pass, and then climate and energy disasters including the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 and then Hurricane Sandy, which took place during the 2012 election. In his second term, Obama lifted the ban on crude oil exports and approved liquified natural gas exports; his planned regulatory approach to reducing greenhouse pollution in the electricity sector, the Clean Power Plan, was blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court.

United States policy in regard to biofuels, such as ethanol fuel and biodiesel, began in the early 1990s as the government began looking more intensely at biofuels as a way to reduce dependence on foreign oil and increase the nation's overall sustainability. Since then, biofuel policies have been refined, focused on getting the most efficient fuels commercially available, creating fuels that can compete with petroleum-based fuels, and ensuring that the agricultural industry can support and sustain the use of biofuels.

The Business Energy Investment Tax Credit (ITC) is a U.S. federal corporate tax credit that is applicable to commercial, industrial, utility, and agricultural sectors. Eligible technologies for the ITC are solar water heat, solar space heat, solar thermal electric, solar thermal process heat, photovoltaics, wind, biomass, geothermal electric, fuel cells, geothermal heat pumps, CHP/cogeneration, solar hybrid lighting, microturbines, and geothermal direct-use.

United States energy law is a function of the federal government, states, and local governments. At the federal level, it is regulated extensively through the United States Department of Energy. Every state, the federal government, and the District of Columbia collect some motor vehicle excise taxes. Specifically, these are excise taxes on gasoline, diesel fuel, and gasohol. While many western states rely a great deal on severance taxes on oil, gas, and mineral production for revenue, most states get a relatively small amount of their revenue from such sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy subsidies in the United States</span> Government aid to reduce fuel costs

Energy subsidies are government payments that keep the price of energy lower than market rate for consumers or higher than market rate for producers. These subsidies are part of the energy policy of the United States.

References

  1. Quiggin, John (November 8, 2013). "Reviving nuclear power debates is a distraction. We need to use less energy". The Guardian.
  2. "History of Ethanol Production and Policy — Energy".
  3. 1 2 "Repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 and Enactment of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005" (PDF). ferc.gov. April 24, 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 20, 2016. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  4. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2011. Retrieved July 2, 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  5. Thurman, Will (November 17, 2008). "Biofuels' Bright Future" (PDF). Forbes. emerging-markets.com. In December 2007, with the imminent arrival of $100-per-barrel oil, the U.S. Congress swiftly acted to upgrade the 2005 biofuels initiative and RFS from its original target of 7 billion US gallons (26,000,000 m3) by 2012 to a revised RFS target (passed in December 2007) of 36 billion US gallons (140,000,000 m3) of biofuels production by 2022.
  6. "Sec. 388" (PDF). U.S.LibraryofCongress. August 8, 2005. p. 152. Retrieved July 11, 2008.
  7. Ken Belsen and Matthew L. Wald, " ’03 Blackout Is Recalled, Amid Lessons Learned", The New York Times , August 13, 2008, found at The New York Times website. Retrieved August 27, 2008.
  8. David Freedlander, "It could happen again: On fifth anniversary of blackout, nation still vulnerable", A.M. N.Y., August 12, 2008. See response at Letter to the Editor [ permanent dead link ]. Retrieved August 27, 2008.
  9. Report, Energy and Commerce Committee, "Blackout 2003: How Did It Happen and Why? Full Committee on Energy and Commerce, September 4, 2003, found at Energy and Commerce Committee website Archived 2008-11-25 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved August 27, 2008.
  10. Congress Passes First Comprehensive Energy Bill in 13 Years, Nuclear Energy Institute, 2005
  11. Bellemare, Bob (January 17, 2007). "New Nuclear Plants Coming to the United States?". Utilipoint. Archived from the original on September 26, 2007.
  12. "Highlights of Nuclear Energy Provisions in Energy Policy Act of 2005". nei.gov. p. 3. Archived from the original on October 24, 2008.
  13. "Highlights of Nuclear Energy Provisions in Energy Policy Act of 2005". nei.gov. p. 6. Archived from the original on October 24, 2008.
  14. "Highlights of Nuclear Energy Provisions in Energy Policy Act of 2005". nei.gov. p. 5. Archived from the original on October 24, 2008.
  15. Kosnik, Renee Lewis (October 2007). "The Oil and Gas Industry's Exclusions and Exemptions to Major Environmental Statutes" (PDF). Earthworks' Oil and Gas Accountability Project. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 18, 2011. Retrieved April 17, 2012.
  16. "What's in the Oil Shale and Tar Sands Leasing Programmatic EIS". Oil Shale and Tar Sands Leasing Programmatic EIS Information Center. Archived from the original on July 3, 2007. Retrieved July 10, 2007.
  17. Detailed 2005 breakdown nei.org Archived July 10, 2007, at the Wayback Machine - PDF, 29kB
  18. Beam, Alex (July 26, 2005). "Dim-witted proposal for daylight time" . Boston Globe.
  19. Kellogg, Ryan; Wolff, Hendrik (January 2007). "Does extending daylight saving time save energy? Evidence from an Australian experiment" (PDF). CSEM WP 163. University of California Energy Institute. Retrieved June 24, 2009.
  20. 1 2 DiLouie, Craig. "NEMA website dedicated to lighting aspects of the Commercial Buildings Tax Deduction". National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Retrieved April 5, 2010.
  21. Goulding, Charles. "EPAct Section 179D".
  22. "§179D Commercial Buildings Energy Efficiency Tax Deduction".
  23. "Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2012-17". See table in §3 of Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
  24. Grunwald, Michael and Juliet Eilperin. "Energy Bill Raises Fears About Pollution, Fraud Critics Point to Perks for Industry." The Washington Post. July 30, 2005.
  25. "Bush signs $12.3 billion energy bill into law." MSNBC. August 8, 2005.
  26. Knight, Peyton. "Small Group of House Republicans Derails ANWR Drilling Archived 2014-08-03 at the Wayback Machine ." Washington, DC: The National Center for Public Policy Research. November 10, 2005.
  27. Zito, Salena (March 15, 2008). "Clinton preaches to her choir". Pittsburgh Tribune-Review .[ permanent dead link ]
  28. "U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 109th Congress - 1st Session". senate.gov.
  29. 92-4 senate.gov
  30. 249-183 clerk.house.gov
  31. 85-12 senate.gov
  32. 71-29 senate.gov
  33. 275-156 clerk.house.gov
  34. 74-26 senate.gov

Government

Events

News

Non-profit