Solar power in Illinois has been increasing, as the cost of photovoltaics has decreased. As of the end of 2020, Illinois had 465 megawatts (MW) of installed photovoltaic and concentrated solar power capacity combined employing over 5,200 jobs. [1] Illinois adopted a net metering rule which allows customers generating up to 40 kW to use net metering, with the kilowatt hour surplus rolled over each month, and lost at the end of either April or October, as selected by the customer. In 2011, the limit was raised to 2 MW, but is not net metering, as the term is commonly known, as it uses two meters for systems larger than 40 kW. [2]
As of 2022, Illinois ranks 17th nationally in cumulative installed solar capacity. There is enough solar energy installed in the state to power 217,000 homes. [3]
The first experimental solar power plant was in 1902, in Olney, Illinois, by H.E. Willsie and John Boyle, and was based on a design by Charles Tellier. [4] In 1904 they set up the Willsie Sun company in St. Louis, and built a 6-horsepower motor. [5]
In 2002, Illinois's largest solar array was the 99.4 kW array on the roof of the Field Museum of Natural History, in Chicago. [6]
In 2010 the country's largest urban solar array, 10 MW, was installed in West Pullman, on Chicago's south side. [7] In 2012, IKEA installed solar PV on its two stores in Bolingbrook and Schaumburg totaling almost 2 MW. [8] Also in 2012, the 20 MW Grand Ridge Solar Plant in LaSalle County was completed. [3] The University of Illinois built a 5.87 MW solar farm in 2015 which will provide 2% of the university's electricity. [9] [10]
In November 2016, ComEd attempted to add additional fees to the bills of only residential solar users, commonly called demand charges, in the text of a wider energy bill. [11] They were eventually pulled out of the bill, [12] which passed in December 2016 without them. [13]
|
Illinois Grid-Connected PV Capacity (MW) [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | Capacity | Installed | % Change |
2007 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 10% |
2008 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 27% |
2009 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 61% |
2010 | 15.5 | 11 | 244% |
2011 | 16.2 | 0.7 | 5% |
2012 | 42.9 | 26.7 | 165% |
2013 | 43.4 | 0.5 | 1% |
2014 | 54 | 10.6 | 24% |
2015 | 65 | 11 | 20% |
2016 | 70 | 5 | 8% |
2017 | 81 | 11 | 16% |
2018 | 106.2 | 25.2 | 31% |
2019 | 211.5 | 105.3 | 99% |
2020 | 465.4 | 253.9 | 120% |
2021 | 1,107.1 | 641.7 | % |
2022 | 2,036 | 928.9 | % |
Year | Total | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2011 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
2012 | 31 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
2013 | 53 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
2014 | 50 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
2015 | 48 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
2016 | 49 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
2017 | 54 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
2018 | 65 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
2019 | 63 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
2020 | 93 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
2021 | 528 | 13 | 16 | 24 | 28 | 34 | 36 | 60 | 61 | 79 | 55 | 69 | 53 |
2022 | 1,601 | 73 | 83 | 110 | 121 | 148 | 167 | 175 | 206 | 182 | 162 | 107 | 67 |
2023 | 977 | 70 | 116 | 137 | 194 | 228 | 232 |
Solar power in Kentucky has been growing in recent years due to new technological improvements and a variety of regulatory actions and financial incentives, particularly a 30% federal tax credit, available through 2016, for any size project. Kentucky could generate 10% of all of the electricity used in the United States from land cleared from coal mining in the state. Covering just one-fifth with photovoltaics would supply all of the state's electricity.
Solar power in Ohio has been increasing, as the cost of photovoltaics has decreased. Ohio installed 10 MW of solar in 2015. Ohio adopted a net metering rule which allows any customer generating up to 25 kW to use net metering, with the kilowatt hour surplus rolled over each month, and paid by the utility once a year at the generation rate upon request. For hospitals there is no limit on size, but two meters are required, one for generation, the other for utility supplied power.
Solar power in Wyoming has the potential to generate 72 million MWh/yr. Wyoming used 12 million MWh in 1999. Net metering is available to all consumers generating up to 25 kW. The state has an installed capacity of 146 MW as of 2022.
Solar power in Indiana has been growing in recent years due to new technological improvements and a variety of regulatory actions and financial incentives, particularly a 30% federal tax credit for any size project.
Solar power in Kansas has been growing in recent years due to new technological improvements and a variety of regulatory actions and financial incentives.
Solar power in West Virginia on rooftops can provide 23% of all electricity used in West Virginia from 6,300 MW of solar panels, but West Virginia will be the last state in the United States to reach grid parity - the point where solar panels are cheaper than grid electricity - without incentives, due to the low cost of electricity - about $0.062/kWh. The point where grid parity is reached is a product of the average insolation and the average cost of electricity. At $0.062/kWh and 4.3 sun-hours/day, solar panels would need to come down to ~$1,850/kW installed to achieve grid parity. The first state in the US to achieve grid parity was Hawaii. Solar power's favorable carbon footprint compared to fossil fuels is a major motivation for expanding renewable energy in the state, especially when compared to coal to generate electrical power.
Solar power in North Dakota has been a little-used resource. The state ranks last on installed solar power in the United States, with .47 MW of installed capacity. Solar on rooftops can provide 24.6% of all electricity used in North Dakota from 3,300 MW of solar panels. The most cost effective application for solar panels is for pumping water at remote wells where solar panels can be installed for $800 vs. running power lines for $15,000/mile.
Solar power in South Dakota has high potential but little practical application. The state ranked 50th among U.S. states in installed solar polar in 2015 with no utility-scale or large commercial systems. Photovoltaic panels on rooftops can provide 38.7% of all electricity used in South Dakota using 3,800 MW of solar panels. The state is ranked 14th in the country in solar power potential, and 4th in wind potential.
Mississippi has substantial potential for solar power, though it remains an underutilized generation method. The rate of installations has increased in recent years, reaching 438 MW of installed capacity in early 2023, ranking 36th among the states. Rooftop photovoltaics could provide 31.2% of all electricity used in Mississippi from 11,700 MW if solar panels were installed on every available roof.
Solar power in Oklahoma can provide 44.1% of all electricity used in Oklahoma from 19,300 MW of rooftop solar panels. This scenario is extremely unlikely though because the cost of electricity in Oklahoma is among the lowest in the nation.
Solar power in Arkansas on rooftops can provide 33.3% of all electricity used in Arkansas from 12,200 MW of solar panels.
Solar power in Alabama on rooftops could theoretically provide 29.8% of all electricity used in Alabama, with 20,400 MW of solar panels potentially installed on rooftops.
Solar power in Georgia on rooftops can provide 31% of all electricity used in Georgia.
Solar power in Maryland is supported by the state's legislation regarding the Renewable Portfolio Standard and Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC) program. The target for renewable energy as of 2017 is 20% by 2020, including 2% from solar power.
Solar power in Missouri has been a growing industry since the early 2010s. Solar power is capable of generating 42.7% of the electricity used in Missouri from rooftop solar panels totaling 28,300 MW.
Solar power in Montana on rooftops could provide 28% of all electricity used in Montana from 3,200 MW of solar panels.
Solar power in New Hampshire provides a small percentage of the state's electricity. State renewable requirements and declining prices have led to some installations. Photovoltaics on rooftops can provide 53.4% of all electricity used in New Hampshire, from 5,300 MW of solar panels, and 72% of the electricity used in Concord, New Hampshire. A 2016 estimate suggests that a typical 5 kW system costing $25,000 before credits and utility savings will pay for itself in 9 years, and generate a profit of $34,196 over the rest of its 25-year life. A loan or lease provides a net savings each year, including the first year. New Hampshire has a rebate program which pays $0.75/W for residential systems up to 5 kW, for up to 50% of the system cost, up to $3,750. However, New Hampshire's solar installation lagged behind nearby states such as Vermont and New York, which in 2013 had 10 times and 25 times more solar, respectively.
Solar power in Vermont provides almost 11% of the state's in-state electricity production as of 2018. A 2009 study indicated that distributed solar on rooftops can provide 18% of all electricity used in Vermont. A 2012 estimate suggests that a typical 5 kW system costing $25,000 before credits and utility savings will pay for itself in 10 years, and generate a profit of $34,956 over the rest of its 25-year life.
Solar power in Wisconsin In 2026, Wisconsin rooftops can accommodate approximately 37 GWs of solar capacity and produce 44,183 GWh of electricity, nearly 70% of the statewide generation in 2019. Net metering is available for systems up to at least 20 kW, and excess generation is credited at retail rate to customers next bill. Some utilities allow net metering up to 100 kW. For Xcel customers, kilowatt credits are rolled over monthly and are reconciled annually at avoided cost. Best practices recommend no limits, either individually or aggregate, and perpetual roll over of kilowatt credits.
Solar power in Tennessee is capable of producing much of the state's electricity; however, the industry remains in early stages in the state. With 129 MW of solar power in 2015, Tennessee ranked 20th among states for installed solar capacity.